Principal Amount			Due Date*
$	250,000		July 23, 2007
$	250,000		January 21, 2008

* If the due date falls on a non-business day, the payment date will be the next business day.

 

 On July, 23 2007, Stillwater elected to convert $252,166.50 of the Note representing $250,000 of the principal amount of the Note due on July 23, 2007 and $2,166.50 of accrued and unpaid interest into shares of common stock. Stillwater received 720,476 shares of the common stock at the conversion price of $0.35.

Amendment Agreements - July 2007

 

As previously reported in the Form 8-K of the Company dated as of July 25, 2007, by way of Amendment Agreements dated July 23, 2007 (the “Amendment Agreements”) between the Company and each of the holders of the Notes, including Stillwater (each a “Holder” and collectively, the “Holders”), the Company agreed to issue each Holder an amended and restated Note for the outstanding Notes (the “Amended Notes”) in the principal amount equal to the principal amount outstanding as of July 23, 2007 and an amended restated Warrant (the “Amended Warrants”).   The changes to the Amended Notes and Amended Warrants include the following:

··	The maturity date for the Amended Notes (totaling after conversions an aggregate of $6,020,000)  was extended to December 21, 2008;
··	Liquidated damages of 1% per month related to the Company’s delisting from the American Stock Exchange will no longer accrue and the deferred interest balance of approximately $230,000 has been forgiven;
··	The Company no longer has to maintain a minimum cash or cash equivalents balances of $600,000;
··	The Amended Notes may not be prepaid without the consent of the Holders;
··	As of July 23, 2007 the interest rate was raised from 6% per annum to 8% per annum;
··	The Amended Notes are convertible into (i) 8,407,612 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The conversion price for the Amended Notes was revised from $2.60 to $0.75 per share, except for the Stillwater Note which remained $0.35 per share for $250,000 of principal (which represents the remaining portion of the original principal balance of $500,000 after Stillwater’s partial conversion);
··	In addition to the right to convert the Amended Notes in the Company’s common stock, up to $3,010,000 of the Amended Notes can be converted into (ii) 3,010 shares of the Company’s newly formed Series A Senior Secured Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred”) at a stated value of $1,000 per share.  The Preferred is convertible into common stock at $0.75 per share, subject to adjustment as provided for in the Certificate of Designations (discussed below);
··	Except for the Stillwater Warrant whose exercise price was unchanged, the Amendment Agreements adjusted the exercise price of the Amended Warrants from $3.60 to $1.03 per share for 1,553,468 shares of common stock and requires the issuance of Warrants exercisable for an additional 3,831,859 shares of common stock  at  $1.03 per share with an expiration date of July 21, 2011;
··	The Amended Notes eliminate the requirement that the Company comply with certain covenants of management contained in the Notes. Specifically, among other things, the requirements to defer management compensation and to maintain a management committee were removed; and
·	The Amended Notes and/or the Preferred are subject to certain anti-dilution adjustment rights in the event the Company issues shares of its common stock or securities convertible into its common stock at a price per share that is less than the Conversion Price, in which case the Conversion Price shall be adjusted to such lower price.  The Amended Warrants are subject to certain anti-dilution adjustment rights in the event the Company issues shares of its common stock or securities convertible into its common stock at a price per share that is less than the Strike Price, in which case the Strike Price shall be adjusted to the lower of (1) 138% of the price at which such common stock is issued or issuable and (2) the exercise price of warrants, issued in such transaction.

 

7

---

 

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") defines "critical accounting policies" as those that require application of management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Not all of the accounting policies require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments or estimates. However, the following policies could be deemed to be critical within the SEC definition.

 

18

---

 

Revenue and Cost Recognition

Revenue on product sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, such as when a purchase order or contract is received from the customer, the price is fixed, title and risk of loss to the goods has changed and there is a reasonable assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. We obtain written purchase authorizations from our customers for a specified amount of product at a specified price and consider delivery to have occurred at the time of shipment. We record a reserve for estimated sales returns, which is reflected as a reduction of revenue at the time of revenue recognition.   Products sold directly to consumers have a fifteen day right of return.  Revenue on consumer products is deferred until the right of return has expired.

Revenues from research and development activities relating to firm fixed-price contracts are generally recognized on the percentage-of-completion method of accounting as costs are incurred (cost-to-cost basis). Revenues from research and development activities relating to cost-plus-fee contracts include costs incurred plus a portion of estimated fees or profits based on the relationship of costs incurred to total estimated costs. Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and an allocation of allowable indirect costs as defined by each contract, as periodically adjusted to reflect revised agreed upon rates. These rates are subject to audit by the other party.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. These estimates and assumptions relate to recording net revenue, collectibility of accounts receivable, useful lives and impairment of tangible and intangible assets, accruals, income taxes, inventory realization and other factors. Management has exercised reasonable judgment in deriving these estimates. Consequently, a change in conditions could affect these estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

eMagin’s cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, short-term investments, accounts payable and debt are stated at cost which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Stock-based Compensation

eMagin maintains several stock equity incentive plans.  The 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) provides our employees with the opportunity to purchase common stock through payroll deductions.  Employees purchase stock semi-annually at a price that is 85% of the fair market value at certain plan-defined dates.  As of December 31, 2007, the number of shares of common stock available for issuance was 225,000.  As of December 31, 2007, the plan had not been implemented.

The 2003 Stock Option Plan (the”2003 Plan”) provides for grants of shares of common stock and options to purchase shares of common stock to employees, officers, directors and consultants.   Under the 2003 plan, an ISO grant is granted at the market value of our common stock at the date of the grant and a non-ISO is granted at a price not to be less than 85% of the market value of the common stock.  These options have a term of up to 10 years and vest over a schedule determined by the Board of Directors, generally over a five year period.  The amended 2003 Plan provides for an annual increase of 3% of the diluted shares outstanding on January 1 of each year for a period of 9 years which commenced January 1, 2005.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which requires the Company to recognize expense related to the fair value of the Company’s share-based compensation issued to employees and directors. SFAS 123R requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations. The Company uses the straight-line method for recognizing compensation expense. An estimate for forfeitures is included in compensation expense for awards under SFAS 123R.  See Note 11 to the December 31, 2007 consolidated  financial statements for a further discussion on stock-based compensation.

 

Our Technology Platforms

OLED-on-Silicon Technology

Scientists working at Eastman Kodak invented OLEDs in the early 1980s. OLEDs are thin films of stable organic materials that emit light of various colors when a voltage is impressed across them. OLEDs are emissive devices, which mean they create their own light, as opposed to liquid crystal displays, which require a separate light source. As a result, OLED devices use less power and can be capable of higher brightness and fuller color than liquid crystal microdisplays. Because the light they emit is Lambertian, which means that it appears equally bright from most forward directions, a moderate movement in the eye does not change the image brightness or color as it does in existing technologies. OLED films may be coated on computer chips, permitting millions of individual low-voltage light sources to be built on silicon integrated circuits to produce single color, white or full-color display arrays. Many computer and video electronic system functions can be built directly into a silicon integrated circuit as part of the OLED display, resulting in an ultra-compact system. We believe these features, together with the well-established silicon integrated circuit fabrication technology of the semiconductor industry, make our OLED-on-silicon microdisplays attractive for numerous applications.

We believe our technology licensing agreement with Eastman Kodak, coupled with our own intellectual property portfolio, gives us a leadership position in OLED and OLED-on-silicon microdisplay technology. Eastman Kodak provides OLED technology and we provide additional technology advancements that have enabled us to coat the silicon integrated circuits with OLEDs.

We have developed numerous and significant enhancements to OLED technology as well as key silicon circuit designs to effectively incorporate the OLED film on a silicon integrated circuit. For example, we have developed a unique, top-emitting structure for our OLED-on-silicon devices that enables OLED displays to be built on opaque silicon integrated circuits rather than only on glass. Our OLED devices can emit full visible spectrum light that can be isolated with color filters to create full color images. Our microdisplay prototypes have a brightness that can be greater than that of a typical notebook computer and can have a potential useful life of over 50,000 operating hours, in certain applications. New materials and device improvements in development offer future potential for even better performance for brightness, efficiency, and lifespan. Additionally, we have invested considerable work over several years to develop unique electronics control and drive designs for OLED-on-silicon microdisplays.

In addition to our OLED-on-silicon technology, we have developed compact optic and lens enhancements which, when coupled with the microdisplay, provide the high quality large screen appearance that we believe a large proportion of the marketplace demands.

 

33

---

 

Advantages of OLED Technology

We believe that our OLED-on-silicon technology provides significant advantages over existing solutions in our targeted microdisplay markets. We believe these key advantages will include:

·	Low manufacturing cost;

·	Low cost system solutions;

·	Wide angle light emission resulting in large apparent screen size;

·	Low power consumption for improved battery life and longer system life;

·	High brightness for improved viewing;

·	High-speed performance resulting in clear video images;

·	Wide operating temperature range; and

·	Good environmental stability (vibration and humidity).

Low manufacturing cost.  Many OLED-on-silicon microdisplays can be built on an 8-inch silicon wafer using existing automated OLED and color filter processing tools. The level of automation used lowers labor costs. Only a minute amount of OLED material is used in each OLED-on-silicon microdisplay so that material costs, other than the integrated circuit itself, are small. The number of displays per silicon wafer may be higher on OLEDs than on liquid crystal displays, or LCDs, because OLEDs do not require a space-wasting perimeter seal band. Expensive transparent wafers with CMOS silicon laminated onto quartz are not required for OLED microdisplays, as standard CMOS chips may be used as backplanes.

Low cost systems solutions.   In general, an OEM using OLED-on-silicon microdisplays will not need to purchase and incorporate lighting assemblies, color converter related Applications Specific Integrated Circuits, or ASICs, or beam splitter lenses as is the case in liquid crystal microdisplays, which also require illumination. Many important display-related system functions can be incorporated into an OLED-on-silicon microdisplay, reducing the size and cost of the system. Non-polarized light from OLEDs permit lenses for many OLED-on-silicon applications that are made of a single piece of molded plastic, which reduces size, weight and assembly cost when compared to the multipiece lens systems used for liquid crystal microdisplays. System cost relative to liquid crystal and liquid crystal on silicon, or LCOS, competitive products is thus reduced. Because our displays are power efficient, they typically require less power at the system level than other display technologies at a given display size and brightness.

Wide-angle light emission simplifies optics for large apparent screen size.  OLEDs emit light at most forward directions from each pixel. This permits the display to be placed close to the lens in compact optical systems. It also provides the added benefit of less angular dependence on the image quality relative to pupil and eye position when showing a large field of view, unlike reflective LCOS microdisplays. This results in less eye fatigue and makes it relatively easy to low power consumption for improved battery life and longer system life. OLEDs emit light rather than transmitting it, so no power-consuming backlight or front light, as required for liquid crystal displays, is required. OLEDs can be energy efficient because of their high efficiency light generation. Furthermore, OLEDs conserve power by powering only those pixels that are on while liquid crystal on silicon requires light at all pixels all the time. Most optical systems used for our OLEDs are highly efficient, permitting over 80% of the light to reach the eye, whereas reflective technologies such as liquid crystal on silicon require multiple beam splitters to get light to the display, and then into the optical system. This results in typically less than 25% light throughput efficiency in reflective microdisplay systems. Most important, we do not need a power-hungry video frame buffer, as required in liquid crystal frame-sequential color systems. Battery life can therefore be extended.

High brightness for improved viewing.  This feature can be of great value to military applications, where there is a need to see the computer image overlaid onto brightly lit real-life backgrounds such as desert sand, water reflections or sunlit clouds. The OLED can be operated over a large luminance range without loss of gray level control, permitting the displays to be used in a range of dark environments to very bright ambient applications. Since military simulation and situation awareness applications, including night vision, typically require large fields of view, the OLED's Lambertian optical characteristics make it an excellent choice.

High-speed performance resulting in clear video image.  OLEDs switch much more rapidly than liquid crystals or most cathode ray tubes, or CRTs. This results in smear-free video rate imagery and provides improved image quality for DVD playback applications. This eliminates visible image smear and makes practicable three-dimensional stereo imaging using a split frame rate. This advantage of our OLED-on-silicon is very important for 3-D stereovision gaming applications.

Flicker-free and no color breakup.  Because the OLED-on-silicon stores brightness and color information at each pixel, the display can be run with no noticeable flicker and no color sequential breakup, even at low refresh rates. A lower refresh rate not only helps reduce power, but it also facilitates system integration. Color sequential breakup occurs in systems such as liquid crystal on silicon and some liquid crystal display microdisplays when red, green and blue frames are sequentially imaged in time for the eye to combine. Since the different color screens occur at different times, movement of the eye due to vibration or just fast pupil movement can create color bands at each dark-light edge, making the image unpleasant to view and making text difficult to read. For example, the liquid crystal on silicon display needs to run at least three times the "normal" frame rate or speed to produce color sequential images, which wastes power and makes for a difficult technological challenge as display resolutions increase.

 

34

---

 

Wide operating temperature range.   Our OLEDs offer much less temperature sensitivity at both high and low temperatures than LCDs. LCDs are sluggish or non-operative much below freezing unless heaters are added and lose contrast above 50 degrees Celsius, while our OLEDs turn on instantly and can operate between -55 degrees Celsius and 130 degrees Celsius. We specify a smaller temperature range on most consumer products to accommodate lower cost packaging. This is an important characteristic for many portable products that may be used outdoors in many varying environmental conditions. It is especially important for military customers. Insensitivity to vibration, shock, and pressure are also important environmental control attributes.

Complementary lens and system technologies.  We have developed a wide range of technologies which complement our core OLED and lens technologies and which will enhance our competitive position in the microdisplay and head-wearable display markets. These include:

Lens technology. High quality, large view lenses with a wide range for eye positioning are essential for using our displays in near-eye systems. We have developed advanced lens technology for microdisplays and personal head-wearable display systems and hold key patents in these areas. Our lens technology permits our OLED-on-silicon microdisplays to provide large field of view images that can be viewed for extended periods with reduced eye-fatigue. We have engaged a firm to manufacture our lenses in order to provide them in larger quantities to our customers and are using them in our own personal display systems.

We believe that the key advantages of our lens technology include:

·	Can be very low cost, with minimal assembly. A one piece, molded plastic optic attached to the microdisplay has been introduced and may potentially serve consumer end-product markets. Since our process is plastic molding, our per unit production costs are low;

·	Allows a compact and lightweight lens system that can greatly magnify a microdisplay to produce a large field of view. For example, our WF05 prism lens, in combination with our SVGA OLED microdisplay, provides a virtual view equivalent to that of a 105-inch diagonal display viewed at 12 feet;

·	Can use single-piece molded microdisplay lenses to permit high light throughput making the display image brighter or permitting the use of less power for an acceptable brightness;

·	Can be designed to provide focusing to enable users with various eyesight qualities to view images clearly; and

·

Can optionally provide focal plane adjustment for simultaneous focusing of computer images and real world objects. For example, this characteristic is beneficial for word processing or spreadsheet applications where a person is typing data in from reference material. This feature can make it easier for people with moderately poor accommodation to use a head-wearable display as a portable computer-viewing accessory.

Personal display system technology. We have developed ergonomic technologies that make head-wearable displays easier to use in a wide variety of applications. For example, the use of our patented rotatable Eyeblocker(TM) provides a sharp image without requiring most users to squint. The Eyeblocker can also be moved to create an effective see-through appearance. To our knowledge, we have made the lightest weight, high-resolution head-wearable display with an over 35 degree diagonal field of view ever publicly demonstrated. We have also incorporated low cost, small size, high speed headtrackers to further enhance game and telepresence applications.

Sales and Marketing

We primarily provide display components for OEMs to incorporate into their branded products and sell through their own well-established distribution channels. In addition, we market head-wearable displays directly to various vertical market channels, such as medical, industrial, and government customers. A typical buyer is a manufacturer of a product requiring a specific resolution of visual display or viewfinder for insertion into a product such as a portable DVD headset, a PC-gaming headset, or an instrument.

We market our services in North America, Asia, and Europe primarily through direct technical sales from our headquarters. Regular purchase orders are processed by our customer service coordinators and technical questions related to product purchases or product applications are processed by our technical support team. As a market-driven company, we assess customer needs both quantitatively and qualitatively, through market research and direct communications. Because our microdisplays are the main functional component that defines many of our customers' end products, we work closely with potential customers to define our products to optimize the final design, typically on a senior engineer-to-engineer basis. Our personal display systems are sold through select value-added resellers and on-line through PC Mall, Google Checkout, and our e-commerce site, www.3dvisor.com.

We identify companies with end products and applications for which we believe that our products will provide a system level solution and for which our products can be a key differentiator. We target both market leaders and select early adopter companies; their acceptance validates our technology and approach in the market. We believe successful marketing will require relationships with recognized consumer brand companies.

Near term sales efforts for OLED microdisplays have been focused on our military, industrial, and medical customers. We have received production orders and design wins for both the SVGA+ and SVGA 3D displays. To date, we have shipped products and evaluation kits to more than 200 OEM customers. An OEM design cycle typically requires between 6 and 36 months, depending on the uniqueness of the market and the complexity of the end product. New product development may require several design iterations prior to commercialization. Some of our initial customers have completed their initial evaluation cycle and we continue to receive follow-on orders and notification of product purchase decisions. (See "Our Market Opportunity: Military; Commercial, Industrial, and Medical; and Consumer")

 

35

---

 

Customers

Customers for our products include both large multinational and smaller OEMs. We maintain relationships with OEMs in a diverse range of industries encompassing the military, industrial, medical, and consumer market sectors. During 2007, 51% of our net revenue was to firms based in the United States and 49% was to international firms as compared to 59% domestic revenue and 41% international revenue during 2006.  In 2007, we had 10 customers that accounted for more than 54% of our total revenue as compared to 5 customers that accounted for more than 68% of our total revenue in 2006. In 2007, we did not have any customers that accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue as compared to 2006, when we had one customer that accounted for 13% of our total revenue.

Backlog

As of March 14, 2008, we had a backlog of approximately $7.3 million for purchases through December 31, 2008. This backlog consists of purchase orders and purchase agreements but does not include expected revenue from R&D contracts or expected NRE (non-recurring engineering) programs under development.

The majority of our backlog consists of purchase agreements for delivery over the next 12 months. Most purchase orders are subject to rescheduling or cancellation by the customer with no or limited penalties. Because of the possibility of customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellations and potential delays in product shipments, our backlog as of a particular date may not be indicative of net sales for any succeeding period. Some customers have experienced delays in their expected product launch schedules due to their own product development delays not directly related to our microdisplays, such as development of custom optics or other aspects of their end product, or by delays in government programs contracted to them.

Research and Development 

 

Near-to-the-eye virtual imaging and OLED technology are relatively new technologies that have considerable room for substantial improvements in luminance, life, power efficiency, voltage swing, design compactness, field of view, optical range of visibility, headtracking options, wireless control and many other parameters. We anticipate that achieving reductions in manufacturing costs will require new technology developments. We also anticipate that improving the performance, capability and cost of our products will provide an important competitive advantage in our fast moving, high technology marketplace. Past and current research activities include development of improved OLED and display device structures, developing and/or evaluating new materials (including the synthesis of new organic molecules), manufacturing equipment and process development, electronics design methodologies and new circuits and the development of new lenses and related systems. In 2007, we spent approximately $2.9 million on research and development. In 2007 we continued to research more efficient materials and processes. We also completed the primary designs of our new smaller display, the SVGA 3DS, as well as the design of the SXGA.

External relationships play an important role in our research and development efforts. Suppliers, equipment vendors, government organizations, contract research groups, external design companies, customer and corporate partners, consortia, and university relationships all enhance the overall research and development effort and bring us new ideas (See "Strategic Relationships").

U.S. Government-Funded Research

We have entered into several U.S. government contracts to fund a portion of our efforts to develop next-generation OLED technologies for a variety of applications. These include, among others, Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II program contracts for continued research and development and the fabrication of prototypes. On contracts for which we are the prime contractor, we subcontract portions of the work to various entities and institutions, including the University of Michigan. Our recent government contracts include the following:

OLED Performance and Reliability Improvement for Active Matrix OLED Microdisplays. Armed forces as well as other security related agencies are relying increasingly on the benefits of OLED technology in active matrix microdisplays. Applications range from night vision thermal imaging to tactical awareness and communication systems to weapons-mounted sights, among others. As the systems capabilities are expanded, the need for higher brightness and ability to display static imagery such as maps and drawings is growing, placing higher demands on the OLED technology. In 2007 eMagin was awarded a contract managed by the Night Vision Electronic Sensors Directorate (NVESD) with funding by the Department of Defense Appropriations Bill. The objective of the program is to improve on the present performance of the microdisplay-based OLED technology from lifetime, efficiency and reliability standpoints. For 2007, we received approximately $360 thousand of the $1.12 million program. The FY 2008 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill has provided for continuation of a second phase of the program

Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED) Display Technology for Military Aircraft. In 2007 we continued our efforts to develop a robust thin film encapsulation technique for OLED displays under a Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) program from the US Navy. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI is the university partner for this STTR. Many new schemes to encapsulate OLED devices with thin film techniques were developed, evaluated and tested under accelerated environmental condition. The contract expired on February 29, 2008. For 2007 we received approximately $328 thousand in funding under this program.

 

36

---

 

Ultra High Resolution Display for Army Medicine. In 2007 we formally initiated efforts on a multiple year program under contract with the US Army TATRC (Telemedicine and Advanced Technologies Research Center) with funding provided by the FY 2006 and 2007 Department of Defense Appropriations Bills. The culmination of this multiple year effort will provide an ultra-high resolution, wide field of view display system suitable for dual-use application within Army medicine, U.S. military simulation and training, and commercial uses. We received approximately $698 thousand  in funding during 2007 under this contract and expect to receive approximately $2 million during 2008.

High Dynamic Range Microdisplay Feasibility Study. The US Army/RDECOM/NVESD and eMagin Corporation have established a CRADA (Cooperative Research and Development Agreement) with the goal of evaluating and characterizing new and existing AMOLED microdisplay configurations with an emphasis on the usable lifetime of the displays. This work is aimed at developing AMOLED microdisplays capable of being fielded in a wide range of US Army applications. The effort is for a 3 month period and is a feasibility study aimed at evaluating several concepts leading to a higher dynamic range without changing the existing pixel driver design of the microdisplays. If successful, a second phase can be considered addressing a complete high dynamic range OLED microdisplay. The total program cost for the 3 month program is approximately$236 thousand. The program started on March 14, 2008.

Manufacturing Facilities

We are located at IBM's Microelectronics Division facility, known as the Hudson Valley Research Park, located about 70 miles north of New York City in Hopewell Junction, New York. We lease approximately 33,000 square feet of space which houses our own equipment for OLED microdisplay fabrication and research and development, includes a 16,300 square foot class 10 clean room space, additional lower level clean room space, assembly space and administrative offices.

Facilities services provided by IBM include our clean room, pure gases, high purity de-ionized water, compressed air, chilled water systems, and waste disposal support. This infrastructure provided by our lease with IBM provides us with many of the resources of a larger corporation without the added overhead costs. It further allows us to focus our resources more efficiently on our product development and manufacturing goals.

We lease additional non-clean room facilities for chemical mixing, cleaning, chemical systems, and glass/silicon cutting. OLED chemicals can be purified in our facility with our own equipment, permitting the company to evaluate new chemicals in pilot production that are not yet available in suitable purity for OLED applications on the market.

Our display fabrication process starts with the silicon wafer, which is manufactured by a semiconductor foundry using conventional CMOS process. After a device is designed by a combination of internal and external designers with customer participation, we outsource wafer fabrication.

Our manufacturing process for OLED-on-silicon microdisplays has three main components: organic film deposition, organic film encapsulation (also known as sealing), and color filter processing. All steps are performed in semi-automated, hands-free environment suitable for high volume throughput. An automated cluster tool provides all OLED deposition steps in a highly controlled environment that is the centerpiece of our OLED fabrication. After wafer processing, each part is inspected using an automated inspection system, prior to shipment. We have electrical and optical instrumentation required to characterize the performance of our displays including photometric and color coordinate analysis. We are also equipped for integrated circuit and electronics design and display testing.

We also lease a facility in Bellevue, Washington where we operate our system development effort and business development activities. The facilities are well suited for designing and building limited volume prototypes and small quantity industrial or government products. Cables and electronic interfaces have recently been produced to permit our OEM customers to more rapidly create products and shorten their time-to-market. We plan to outsource medium to high volume subsystem production to low cost plastics, lenses, and assembly manufacturers. We are currently using domestic and international outside manufacturers and we are investigating new outsource opportunities.

We believe that manufacturing efficiency is an important factor for success in the consumer markets. We believe that high yield and maximum utilization of our equipment set will be key for profitability. The equipment required for initial profitable production is in place. Some equipment will be added when our production volume increases or as needed.

 

We have filed a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, relating to the shares of common stock being offered by this prospectus, and reference is made to such registration statement. This prospectus constitutes the prospectus of eMagin Corp., filed as part of the registration statement, and it does not contain all information in the registration statement, as certain portions have been omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which requires us to file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such reports, proxy statements and other information may be inspected at public reference facilities of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. Copies of such material can be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 at prescribed rates. Because we file documents electronically with the SEC, you may also obtain this information by visiting the SEC’s Internet website at http://www.sec.gov.

 

56

---

 

eMAGIN CORPORATION

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	57
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006	58
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005	59
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Capital Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005	60
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005	61
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	62

 

57

---

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

eMagin Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of eMagin Corporation (the "Company") as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity (capital deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits include consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of eMagin Corporation as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has had recurring losses from operations which it believes will continue, and has working capital and capital deficits at December 31, 2007.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  Management's plans in regard to these matters are also discussed in Note 2.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation effective January 1, 2006.

\s\ Eisner LLP

New York, New York

April 9, 2008

 

58

---

 

eMAGIN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

		December 31,
		2007				2006
		(In thousands, except
		share and per share amounts)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	713			$	1,415
Investments – held to maturity			94				171
Accounts receivable, net			2,383				908
Inventory			1,815				2,485
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			850				656
Total current assets			5,855				5,635
Equipment, furniture and leasehold improvements, net			292				666
Intangible assets, net			51				55
Other assets			232				233
Deferred financing costs, net			218				416
Total assets		$	6,648			$	7,005
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	620			$	1,192
Accrued compensation			891				959
Other accrued expenses			729				749
Advance payments			35				444
Deferred revenue			179				126
Current portion of debt			7,089				1,223
Derivative liability - warrants			—				1,195
Other current liabilities			1,020				52
Total current liabilities			10,563				5,940
Long-term debt			60				2,229
Total liabilities			10,623				8,169
Commitments and contingencies
Capital deficit:
Preferred stock, $.001 par value: authorized 10,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding			—				—
Series A Senior Secured Convertible Preferred stock, stated value $1,000 per share, $.001 par value:  3,198 shares designated and none issued			—				—
Common stock, $.001 par value: authorized 200,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding, 12,620,900 shares in 2007 and 10,341,029 shares in 2006			12				10
Additional paid in capital			195,326				179,651
Accumulated deficit			(199,313	)			(180,825	)
Total capital deficit			( 3,975	)			( 1,164	)
Total liabilities and capital deficit		$	6,648			$	7,005

 

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

59

---

 

eMAGIN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		For the Year Ended December 31,
		2007				2006				2005
		(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenue:
Product revenue		$	16,169			$	7,983			$	3,709
Contract revenue			1,385				186				36
Total revenue, net			17,554				8,169				3,745
Cost of goods sold			12,628				11,359				10,219
Gross profit (loss)			4,926				(3,190	)			(6,474	)
Operating expenses:
Research and development			2,949				4,406				4,020
Selling, general and administrative			6,591				8,860				6,316
Total operating expenses			9,540				13,266				10,336
Loss from operations			(4,614	)			(16,456	)			(16,810	)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense			(3,087	)			(1,306	)			(4	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt			(10,749	)			—				—
(Loss) gain on warrant derivative liability			(853	)			2,405				—
Other income, net			815				91				286
Total other (expense) income, net			(13,874	)			1,190				282
Net loss		$	(18,488	)		$	(15,266	)		$	(16,528	)
Loss per share, basic and diluted		$	(1.59	)		$	(1.52	)		$	(1.94	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted			11,633				10,058				8,541

 

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

60

---

 

 eMAGIN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (CAPITAL DEFICIT)

																		Total
		Common Stock								Additional				Accumulated				Shareholders’  Equity
		Shares				Amount				Paid –in Capital				Deficit				(Capital Deficit)
		(In thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2004			7,964			$	8			$	165,471			$	(149,031	)		$	16,448
Sale of common stock, net of issuance costs			1,662				2				8,398				—				8,400
Stock options exercised			11				—				37				—				37
Exercise of common stock warrants			306				—				1,584				—				1,584
Issuance of common stock for services			54				—				461				—				460
Net loss			—				—				—				(16,528	)			(16,528	)
Balance, December 31, 2005			9,997			$	10			$	175,950			$	(165,559	)		$	10,401
Debt to equity conversion			85				—				220				—				220
Issuance of common stock for services			254				—				580				—				580
Stock-based compensation			—				—				2,891				—				2,891
Stock options exercised			5				—				10				—				10
Net loss			—				—				—				(15,266	)			(15,266	)
Balance, December 31, 2006			10,341			$	10				179,651			$	(180,825	)		$	(1,164	)
Debt to equity conversion			797				1				310				—				311
Issuance of common stock for services			1,473				1				1,324				—				1,325
Exercise of common stock warrants			10				—				3				—				3
Stock-based compensation			—				—				1,652				—				1,652
Expiration of derivative liability- warrants			—				—				2,653				—				2,653
Beneficial conversion premium			—				—				5,078				—				5,078
Fair value of warrants issued			—				—				4,655				—				4,655
Net loss			—				—								(18,488	)			(18,488	)
Balance, December 31, 2007			12,621			$	12			$	195,326			$	(199,313	)		$	( 3,975	)

 

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

61

---

 

eMAGIN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

		Year Ended December 31,
		2007				2006				2005
		(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss		$	(18,488	)		$	(15,266	)		$	(16,528	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in    operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			392				841				908
Amortization of deferred financing fees			418				221				---
Reduction of provision for sales returns and doubtful accounts			(79	)			(39	)			(284	)
Stock based compensation			1,652				2,891				---
Issuance of common stock for services, net			1,325				553				470
Amortization of discount on notes payable			1,925				956				---
Loss (gain) on warrant derivative liability			853				(2,405	)			---
Loss on extinguishment of debt			10,749				---				---
Loss on other asset			---				157				---
Write-off of miscellaneous receivable			103				---				---
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			(1,390	)			(42	)			(2	)
Inventory			670				1,354				(1,821	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			(194	)			389				(175	)
Advance payments			(409	)			384				(4	)
Deferred revenue			53				30				96
Accounts payable, accrued compensation, and accrued expenses			(381	)			(566	)			1,613
Other current liabilities			858				153				14
Net cash used in operating activities			(1,943	)			(10,389	)			(15,713	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of equipment			(16	)			(204	)			(898	)
Proceeds from maturity of (purchase of) investments – held to maturity			77				(51	)			(120	)
Purchase of intangibles and other assets			---				(2	)			(54	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities			61				(257	)			(1,072	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of issuance costs			---				---				8,400
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants			3				10				1,621
Proceeds from long-term debt			1,608				5,970				50
Payments related to deferred financing costs			(368	)			(591	)			---
Payments of long-term debt and capitalized lease obligations			(63	)			(55	)			(16	)
Net cash provided by financing activities			1,180				5,334				10,055
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents			(702	)			(5,312	)			(6,730	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year			1,415				6,727				13,457
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year		$	713			$	1,415			$	6,727
Cash paid for interest		$	426			$	128			$	4
Cash paid for taxes		$	78			$	40			$	15
Supplemental non-cash transactions:
Conversion of debt to equity		$	311			$	220			$	---

 

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company

· Entered into an intellectual property agreement with Kodak where Kodak was assigned the rights to a specific patent and as part of the consideration waived the royalty payments for the first six months of 2007 and reduced the royalty payment to 50% for the third and fourth quarters of 2007. $869 thousand was recorded as other income from the gain on the licensing of intangible assets;

· Entered into an amended Note Purchase Agreement with investors and issued warrants that are exercisable at $1.03 per share into approximately 5.4 million shares of common stock valued at $5.5 million.

 

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

62

---

 

 

The changes to the Amended Notes include the following:

●	The due date for the outstanding Notes (totaling after conversions an aggregate of $6,020,000) has been extended to December 21, 2008;
●	The Amended Notes are convertible into (i) 8,407,612 shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion price for $5,770,000 of principal was revised from $2.60 to $0.75 per share. The conversion price of $0.35 per share for $250,000 of principal was unchanged;

●	$3,010,000 of the Notes can convert into (ii) 3,010 shares of the Company’s newly formed Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred”) at a conversion price of $1,000 per share. The Preferred is convertible into common stock at the same price allowable by the Amended Notes, subject to adjustment as provided for in the Certificate of Designations;
●	The Amended Notes adjust the exercise price from $3.60 to $1.03 per share for 1,553,468 Warrants and require the issuance of 3,831,859 Warrants exercisable at $1.03 per share pursuant to which the holders may acquire common stock, until July 21, 2011; and

●	As of July 23, 2007 the interest rate was raised from 6% to 8%.

On March 28, 2007, we entered into an amendment of the Note Purchase Agreement (the “Stillwater Note Purchase Agreement”) for the sale of $500 thousand of senior secured debentures (the “Stillwater Note”) and warrants to purchase approximately 1.0 million shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share. The investor purchased the Stillwater Note with a conversion price of $0.35 per share that may convert into approximately 1.4 million shares of common stock and warrants exercisable at $0.48 per share into approximately 1.0 million shares of common stock expiring in 4.2 years. If the Stillwater Notes are not converted, 50% of the principal amount will be due on July 21, 2007 and the remaining 50% will be due on January 21, 2008. 6% interest is payable in quarterly installments on outstanding notes with the first installment to be paid June 1, 2007. On April 9, 2007, we closed the transaction and received approximately $460 thousand, net of offering costs of approximately $40 thousand which are amortized over the life of the Stillwater Note.

In 2006, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 114,855 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $2.64 per share to employees as compensation for services performed on behalf of our company. In addition, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 3,900 shares of common stock at a price equal to $2.60 per share to a director as compensation for services performed on our behalf as his capacity as director of our company.

 

84

---

 

On July 21, 2006, we entered into several Note Purchase Agreements, including the Stillwater Note Purchase Agreement, for the sale of approximately $5.99 million of senior secured debentures (the “Notes”) together with warrants to purchase approximately 1.8 million shares of common stock. The Notes may convert into approximately $2.3 million shares at a conversion price of $2.60. The 5 year warrants are exercisable at $3.60 per share into approximately 1.6 million shares of common stock. 50% of the aggregate principal amount matures on July 21, 2007 and the remaining 50% matures on January 21, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2006, two note holders converted their promissory notes valued at approximately $0.22 million and were issued an aggregate of approximately 85 thousand shares.

 

Exhibit Number	Description
2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger between Fashion Dynamics Corp., FED Capital Acquisition Corporation and FED Corporation dated March 13, 2000 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on March 17, 2000).
3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed on June 14, 2001).
3.2	Amended Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to exhibit A to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed on June 13, 2003).
3.3	Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.3 to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed on June 14, 2001).
4.1	Form of Warrant dated as of April 25, 2003 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2003).
4.2	Form of Series A Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of January 9, 2004 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2004).
4.3	Form of Series B Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of January 9, 2004 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2004).
4.4	Form of Series C Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of January 9, 2004 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2004).
4.5	Form of Series D Warrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's current report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2004).
4.6	Form of Series E Warrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's current report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2004).
10.1	2000 Stock Option Plan, (incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 14, 2000).*
10.2	Form of Agreement for Stock Option Grant pursuant to 2003 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 14, 2000).*
4.7	Form of Series F Warrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's current report on Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2004).
4.8	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated October 20, 2005, filed October 31, 2005, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.3	Nonexclusive Field of Use License Agreement relating to OLED Technology for miniature, high resolution displays between the Eastman Kodak Company and FED Corporation dated March 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2000 filed on April 30, 2001).
10.4	Amendment Number 1 to the Nonexclusive Field of Use License Agreement relating to the LED Technology for miniature, high resolution displays between the Eastman Kodak Company and FED Corporation dated March 16, 2000 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2000 filed on April 30, 2001).
10.5	Lease between International Business Machines Corporation and FED Corporation dated May 28, 1999 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 filed on March 30, 2001).
10.6	Amendment  Number  1  to  the  Lease  between  International  Business Machines   Corporation  and  FED   Corporation   dated  July  9,  1999 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2000  filed on March 30, 2001).
10.7	Amendment  Number  2  to  the  Lease  between  International  Business Machines  Corporation  and FED  Corporation  dated  January  29,  2001 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2000  filed on March 30, 2001).
10.8	Amendment Number 3 to Lease between International Business Machines Corporation and FED Corporation dated May 28, 2002.
10.9	Amendment Number 4 to Lease between International Business Machines Corporation and FED Corporation dated December 14, 2004.
10.10	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 25, 2003 by and among eMagin and certain initial investors identified on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2003).
10.11	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004 by and among eMagin and the investors identified on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2004).
10.12	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004 by and among eMagin and certain initial investors identified on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2004).
10.13	Master Amendment Agreement dated as of February 17, 2004 by and among eMagin and the investors identified on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2004).
10.14	Registration  Rights  Agreement  dated as of February  17, 2004 by and among eMagin and certain initial investors identified on the signature pages  thereto  (incorporated  by  reference to  exhibit  10.2  to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2004).
10.15	Letter Agreement  amending the Master Amendment  Agreement dated as of  March 1,  2004 by and  among  eMagin  and the  parties  to the  Master  Amendment Agreement  (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2004).
10.16	Lease between  International  Business  Machines  Corporation  and FED Corporation  dated May 28,  1999,  as filed in the  Registrant's  Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2000  incorporated by reference herein.
10.17	Amendment  Number  2  to  the  Lease  between  International  Business Machines  Corporation and FED  Corporation  dated January 29, 2001, as  filed in the Registrant's  Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2000 incorporated by reference herein.
10.18	Secured Note Purchase  Agreement entered into as of November 27, 2001, by and among eMagin  Corporation and certain  investors named therein, as  filed  in the  Registrant's  Form  8-K  dated  December  18,  2001 incorporated herein by reference.
10.19	Securities  Purchase Agreement dated as of April 25, 2003 by and among eMagin and the investors  identified on the signature  pages  thereto,  filed  April  28,  2003,  as  filed  in  the  Registrant's   Form  8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.20	Registration  Rights Agreement dated as of April 25, 2003 by and among eMagin and certain initial investors identified on the signature pages thereto  filed April 28, 2003, as filed in the  Registrant's  Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.21	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004 by and among eMagin and the investors  identified on the signature  pages  thereto, filed  January  9,  2004,  as  filed  in  the  Registrant's  Form  8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.22	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004 by and among eMagin and certain initial investors identified on the signature pages thereto.  Incorporated herein by reference to our January 9, 2004 Form 8-K.

 

 

87

---

 

 

 

10.23	Master Amendment  Agreement dated as of February 17, 2004 by and among eMagin and the investors  identified on the signature  pages  thereto, filed  March  4,  2004,  as  filed  in  the   Registrant's   Form  8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.24	Registration  Rights  Agreement  dated as of February  17, 2004 by and among eMagin and certain initial investors identified on the signature pages  thereto,  filed  March 4, 2004,  as  filed  in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.25	Letter Agreement  amending the Master Amendment  Agreement dated as of  March 1,  2004 by and  among  eMagin  and the  parties  to the  Master Amendment Agreement, filed March 4, 2004, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.26	2004 Non-Employee Compensation Plan, filed July 7, 2004, as filed in the Registrant’s Form S-8, incorporated herein by reference.*
10.27	Form of Letter Agreement by and among eMagin and the holders of the Class A, Class B and Class C common stock purchase warrants, filed August 9, 2004, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.28	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of October 21, 2004 by and among eMagin and the purchasers listed on the signature pages thereto, filed October 26, 2004, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.29	Placement Agency Agreement dated as of October 21, 2004 by and among eMagin and W.R. Hambrecht & Co., LLC, filed October 26, 2004, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.30	Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2004, by and between eMagin and Larkspur Capital Corporation, filed October 26, 2004, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.31	Amendment No. 4 to Lease by and between eMagin and International Business Machines Corporation, filed December 20, 2004, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.32	Sublease Agreement dated as of July 14, 2005 by and between eMagin and Capgemini U.S., LLC, filed August 2, 2005, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.33	Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Option Plan, filed September 1, 2005, as filed in the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement, incorporated herein by reference.*
10.34	Amended and Restated 2004 Non-Employee Compensation Plan, filed September 1, 2005, as filed in the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement, incorporated herein by reference.*
10.35	2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, filed September 1, 2005, as filed in the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement, incorporated herein by reference.*
10.36	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of October 20, 2005, by and among eMagin and the purchasers listed on the signature pages thereto, filed October 31, 2005, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.37	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 20, 2005, by and among eMagin and the purchasers listed on the signature pages thereto, filed October 31, 2005, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.38	Employment Agreement effective as of January 1, 2006 by and between eMagin and Gary Jones, filed January 27, 2006, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.39	Employment Agreement effective as of January 1, 2006 by and between eMagin and Susan Jones, filed January 27, 2006, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.40	Amendment to Employment Agreement as of April 17, 2006 by and between eMagin and Gary Jones.
10.41	Amendment to Employment Agreement as of April 17, 2006 by and between eMagin and Susan Jones.
10.42	Form of Note Purchase Agreement dated July 21, 2006, by and among the Company and the investors named on the signature pages thereto, filed July 25, 2006, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.43	Form of 6% Senior Secured Convertible Note Due 2007-2008 of the Company dated July 21, 2006, filed July 25, 2006, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.44	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant of the Company dated July 21, 2006, filed July 25, 2006, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.45	Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of July 21, 2006 by and between the Company and Alexandra Global Master Fund Ltd., as collateral agent, filed July 25, 2006, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.46	Patent and Trademark Security Agreement dated as of July 21, 2006 by and between the Company and Alexandra Global Master Fund Ltd., as collateral agent, filed July 25, 2006, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.47	Lockbox Agreement dated as of July 21, 2006 by and between the Company and Alexandra Global Master Fund Ltd., as collateral agent, filed July 25, 2006, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.48	Form of Note Purchase Agreement dated July 21, 2006, by and between the Company and Stillwater LLC, filed July 25, 2006, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.49*	2004 Amended and Restated Non-Employee Compensation Plan, filed September 21, 2006, as filed in the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement incorporated herein by reference.
10.50	Executive Separation and Consulting Agreement dated as of January 11, 2007 by and between eMagin Corporation and Gary W. Jones, filed January 19, 2007, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K/A incorporated herein by reference.
10.51	Letter Agreement dated as of February 12, 2007 by and between eMagin Corporation and Dr. K.C. Park, filed February 16, 2007, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.52	Allonge to the 6% Senior Secured Convertible Notes Due 2007-2008 of eMagin Corporation dated as of March 9, 2007, filed March 13, 2007, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.
10.53	First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement as of March 28, 2007 by and between eMagin Corporation and Stillwater LLC, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K dated April 25, 2007 incorporated herein by reference.
10.54	Note Purchase Agreement as of April 9, 2007 by and between eMagin Corporation and Stillwater LLC, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K dated April 25, 2007 incorporated herein by reference.
10.55	Note Purchase Agreement as of April 9, 2007 by and between eMagin Corporation and Stillwater LLC, as filed in the Registrant's Form 8-K dated April 25, 2007 incorporated herein by reference.
10.56	Amendment Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2007, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed on July 25, 2007.
10.57	Form of Amended and Restated 8% Senior Secured Convertible Note due 2008, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed on July 25, 2007.
10.58	Form of Amended and Restated Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed on July 25, 2007.
10.59	Form of Amendment No. 1 to Patent and Security Agreement, , filed July 25, 2007, Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed on July 25, 2007.
10.60	Form of Amendment No. 1 to Pledge and Security Agreement, filed July 25, 2007, Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed on July 25, 2007.
10.61	Form of Lockbox Agreement, filed July 25, 2007, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed on July 25, 2007.
10.62	6% Senior Secured Convertible Note, dated April 9, 2007, by and between the Company and Stillwater LLC, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed on April 26, 2007.
10.63	Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated April 9, 2007, by and between the Company and Stillwater LLC, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed on April 26, 2007.
10.64	Employment Agreement between the Company and Tatum, LLC, dated December 26, 2007, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed on January 3, 2008.
10.65	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K/A as filed on February 8, 2008.
10.66	Amendment No. 1 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2008, to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated August 7, 2007, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K/A as filed February 8, 2008.
10.67	Warrant Issuance Agreement, dated January 30, 2008, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K/A as filed February 8, 2008.
10.68	Form of Amended and Restated Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K/A as filed on February 8, 2008.
10.69	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K, as filed on March 31, 2008.
10.70	Amendment No. 2 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2008 to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated August 7, 2007, as amended on January 30, 2008, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K, as filed March 31, 2008.
10.71	Amendment No. 1 to Warrant Issuance Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2008, as amended on January 30, 2008, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K, as filed March 31, 2008.
10.72	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K, as filed on April 4, 2008.
10.73	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 2, 2008, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K, as filed April 4, 2008.
10.74	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 2, 2008, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K, as filed April 4, 2008.
10.75	Agreement between the Company and Tatum, LLC, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed 18, 2008
23.3	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith).
* Each of the Exhibits noted by an asterisk is a management compensatory plan or arrangement.

88

---

 

ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS.

 

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to:

 

(1) File, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:

 

(i) Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”);

 

(ii) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or together, represent a fundamental change in the information in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of the securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement, and,

 

(iii) Include any additional or changed material information on the plan of distribution.

 

(2) For determining liability under the Securities Act, treat each post-effective amendment as a new registration statement of the securities offered, and the offering of the securities at that time to be the initial bona fide offering.

 

(3) File a post-effective amendment to remove from registration any of the securities that remain unsold at the end of the offering.

 

(4) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, treat the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act as part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

1.	Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

2.	Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;

3.	The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and

4.	Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.

 (6) For determining any liability under the Securities Act, treat each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus as a new registration statement for the securities offered in the registration statement, and that offering of the securities at that time as the initial bona fide offering of those securities.

 

(7) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

(8) Each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

 

89

---