UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

 

 

x

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

 

 

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

 

 

For the quarterly period ended December 30, 2006

 

 

 

or

 

 

 

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

 

 

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

 

 

For the transition period from                   to                   

 

Commission File Number 0-21272

Sanmina-SCI Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

 

77-0228183

(State or other jurisdiction of

 

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

 

Identification Number)

 

 

 

2700 N. First St., San Jose, CA

 

95134

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(408) 964-3500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer  x

Accelerated filer  o

Non-accelerated filer  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o         No x

As of January 25, 2007, there were 530,057,856 shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share.

 




SANMINA-SCI CORPORATION

INDEX

 

 

 

Page

 

 

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

Item 1.

 

Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

3

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

4

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

5

 

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

6

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

26

Item 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

50

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

51

 

 

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

53

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

53

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

 

53

Signatures

 

 

 

55

 

2




SANMINA-SCI CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

December 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2006 *

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

538,828

 

$

491,829

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $9,695 and $8,971, at December 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006, respectively

 

1,558,141

 

1,526,373

 

Inventories

 

1,328,141

 

1,318,400

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

169,174

 

154,401

 

Restricted cash

 

532,875

 

 

Total current assets

 

4,127,159

 

3,491,003

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

615,203

 

620,132

 

Other intangible assets, net

 

27,924

 

29,802

 

Goodwill

 

1,618,087

 

1,613,230

 

Other non-current assets

 

95,254

 

94,512

 

Restricted cash

 

13,040

 

13,751

 

Total assets

 

$

6,496,667

 

$

5,862,430

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

1,481,682

 

$

1,494,603

 

Accrued liabilities

 

249,969

 

223,263

 

Accrued payroll and related benefits

 

137,684

 

156,248

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

624,779

 

100,135

 

Total current liabilities

 

2,494,114

 

1,974,249

 

Long-term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

1,582,526

 

1,507,218

 

Other

 

112,143

 

110,400

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

1,694,669

 

1,617,618

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock

 

5,515

 

5,519

 

Treasury stock

 

(186,026

)

(186,361

)

Additional paid-in capital

 

5,955,496

 

5,952,857

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

48,710

 

42,608

 

Accumulated deficit

 

(3,515,811

)

(3,544,060

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

2,307,884

 

2,270,563

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

6,496,667

 

$

5,862,430

 

 


*

 

Derived from the September 30, 2006 audited consolidated financial statements. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

 

See accompanying notes.

3




SANMINA-SCI CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

2,778,790

 

$

2,861,797

 

Cost of sales

 

2,610,112

 

2,693,310

 

Gross profit

 

168,678

 

168,487

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

96,318

 

90,103

 

Research and development

 

8,962

 

9,047

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

1,650

 

2,233

 

Restructuring costs

 

3,215

 

35,628

 

Total operating expenses

 

110,145

 

137,011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

58,533

 

31,476

 

Interest income

 

10,900

 

5,925

 

Interest expense

 

(43,331

)

(32,952

)

Other income (expense), net

 

10,961

 

(5,707

)

Interest and other expense, net

 

(21,470

)

(32,734

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change

 

37,063

 

(1,258

)

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

8,814

 

(12,957

)

Income before cumulative effect of accounting change

 

28,249

 

11,699

 

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax

 

 

5,695

 

Net income

 

$

28,249

 

$

17,394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share before cumulative effect of accounting change:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.02

 

Diluted

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.03

 

Diluted

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares used in computing per share amounts:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

527,110

 

524,311

 

Diluted

 

528,298

 

524,694

 

 

See accompanying notes.

4




SANMINA-SCI CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

28,249

 

$

17,394

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

30,459

 

35,170

 

Restructuring non-cash costs (recovery)

 

(2,875

)

15,585

 

Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts

 

773

 

(51

)

Stock-based compensation

 

2,635

 

6,619

 

Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment, net

 

(6,190

)

(1,177

)

Loss on interest rate swap

 

 

5,464

 

Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net

 

 

(5,695

)

Proceeds from sale of accounts receivable

 

478,378

 

348,201

 

Other, net

 

362

 

307

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

(504,472

)

(487,179

)

Inventories

 

(3,588

)

(110,576

)

Prepaid expenses and other current and non-current assets

 

(17,418

)

9,648

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

(14,065

)

108,866

 

Restricted cash

 

1,170

 

 

Income tax accounts

 

(3,644

)

(8,823

)

Cash used in operating activities

 

(10,226

)

(66,247

)

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of long-term investments

 

(250

)

(128

)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

(19,134

)

(22,546

)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

 

24,883

 

4,310

 

Cash paid for businesses acquired, net of cash acquired

 

(4,053

)

(157

)

Purchases of short-term investments

 

 

(16,562

)

Proceeds from maturities and sale of short-term investments

 

 

45,432

 

Cash provided by investing activities

 

1,446

 

10,349

 

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Payment made to trustee, held in escrow

 

(532,875

)

 

Proceeds from long-term debt, net of issuance cost

 

593,409

 

 

Payments of notes and credit facilities, net

 

(39

)

(262

)

Proceeds from sale of common stock

 

 

5,607

 

Cash provided by financing activities

 

60,495

 

5,345

 

Effect of exchange rate changes

 

(4,716

)

(6,402

)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

46,999

 

(56,955

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

491,829

 

1,068,053

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

538,828

 

$

1,011,098

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the period

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

4,672

 

$

1,159

 

Income taxes

 

$

13,156

 

$

9,078

 

 

See accompanying notes.

5




SANMINA-SCI CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1.  Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Sanmina-SCI Corporation (“Sanmina-SCI”, “we”, “our”, “the Company”) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules or regulations. The interim financial statements are unaudited, but reflect all normal recurring adjustments and non-recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation.

The results of operations for the three months ended December 30, 2006, is not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year. We have restated our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three month period ended December 31, 2005, refer to our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.

These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended September 30, 2006, included in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On September 13, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements”. SAB No. 108, addresses quantifying the financial statement effects of misstatements; specifically, how the effects of prior year uncorrected misstatements must be considered in quantifying misstatements in the current year financial statements. In addition, SAB No. 108 provides guidance on the correction of misstatements, including the correction of prior period financial statements for immaterial misstatements. Importantly, SAB No. 108 offers a “one-time” special transition provision for correcting certain prior year misstatements that were uncorrected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. SAB No. 108 is effective for fiscal years ended after November 15, 2006. We expect to adopt this standard at year end September 29, 2007. We are currently reviewing this bulletin to determine the potential impact to our financial statements.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans–an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).” The statement requires an employer to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a plan’s over-funded status or a liability for a plan’s under-funded status. The measurement date of the plans’ assets and obligations that determine the funded status will be as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year. The statement will be effective as of the end of fiscal 2007. We are currently reviewing this statement to determine the potential impact to our financial position, results of operations, and related cash flows.

Note 2.  Stock-Based Compensation

Effective October 2, 2005, the Company began recording compensation expense associated with stock options and other forms of equity compensation in accordance with the SFAS No. 123R. We adopted the modified prospective transition method pursuant to SFAS No. 123R, and consequently have not retroactively adjusted results from prior periods. Under this transition method, compensation cost associated with equity compensation recognized in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, now includes: 1) quarterly amortization related to the remaining unvested portion of all equity compensation awards granted prior to October 2, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123 and 2) quarterly amortization related to all stock option awards granted subsequent to October 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. The compensation expense for stock based compensation awards includes an estimate for forfeitures and is

6




recognized over the vesting term using the ratable method. The Company recorded a cumulative effect benefit adjustment for estimated forfeitures of approximately $5.7 million for previously issued restricted stock and stock options upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.

Total stock compensation expense (excluding the $5.7 million benefit recorded on cumulative effect of accounting change) for the three months ended December 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005 (restated), respectively, are represented by expense categories in the table below:

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30,
2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Cost of sales

 

$

1,038

 

$

2,586

 

Selling, general & administrative

 

1,502

 

3,784

 

Research & development

 

95

 

249

 

 

 

$

2,635

 

$

6,619

 

 

Stock Options

Our stock option plans provide our employees the right to purchase common stock at the fair market value of such shares on the grant date. The Company amortizes its stock options over the vesting period which is generally five years. New hire options vest 20% at the end of year one and then vest ratably each month, thereafter, for the remaining four years. Recurring option grants vest ratably each month over a five-year period. The contract term of the options is ten years. We applied SFAS No. 123R fair value based on a historical approach. For all option grants prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we recognize compensation cost using the multiple option approach. For all option grants subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we recognize compensation cost ratably over the service period..

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the assumptions noted in the following table. The expected life of options is based on observed historical exercise patterns. The expected volatility is an equally weighted blend of implied volatilities from traded options on our stock having a life of more than one year and historical volatility over the expected life of the options. The risk free interest rate is based on the implied yield on a U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issue with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the option. The dividend yield reflects that we have not paid any dividends and have no intention to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

The assumptions used for options granted during the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are presented below:

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30,
2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

Volatility

 

56.3

%

53.0

%

Risk-free interest rate

 

4.60

%

4.35

%

Dividend yield

 

0

%

0

%

Expected life of options

 

5.5 years

 

5.4 years

 

 

7




We recorded approximately $904,000 and $3.3 million of compensation expense related to stock options for the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (restated), respectively, in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. A summary of stock option activity under the plans for the three months ended December 30, 2006, is presented as follows:

Summary Details for Plan Share Options

 

Number of
Shares

 

Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price

 

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value of
In-The-Money
Options

 

 

 

 

 

($)

 

(Years)

 

($)

 

Outstanding, September 30, 2006

 

50,713,754

 

8.47

 

6.22

 

458,342

 

Granted

 

103,500

 

3.94

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired

 

(4,121,288

)

6.94

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 30, 2006

 

46,695,966

 

8.60

 

6.15

 

320,953

 

Vested and expected to vest, December 30, 2006

 

45,357,549

 

8.73

 

6.07

 

310,225

 

Exercisable, December 30, 2006

 

40,441,678

 

9.30

 

5.73

 

270,820

 

 

The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (restated) was $2.18 for both periods. There were no stock options exercised during the three months ended December 30, 2006. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three months ended December 31, 2005 was $2.4 million. The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pretax intrinsic value of in-the-money options based on the Company’s closing stock price of $3.45 as of December 29, 2006, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. The total number of in-the-money options exercisable as of December 30, 2006 was 259,259 and the weighted average exercise price was $2.41.

At December 30, 2006, an aggregate of 70.8 million shares were authorized for future issuance under our stock plans, which covers stock options, employee stock purchase plans, and restricted stock awards. A total of 16.5 million shares of common stock were available for grant under our stock option plans as of December 30, 2006. Awards that expire or are cancelled without delivery of shares generally become available for issuance under the plans.

As of December 30, 2006, there was $17.3 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.89 years.

During the three months ended December 31, 2005, a one-time, non-cash benefit of approximately $0.3 million (restated) for estimated future forfeitures of stock options previously expensed was recorded as of the SFAS No. 123R implementation date and reported as a cumulative effect of accounting change. Pursuant to APB No. 25, stock compensation expense was not reduced for estimated future forfeitures, but instead was reversed upon actual forfeiture.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In fiscal 2003, the Board of Directors and stockholders of the Company approved the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2003 ESPP”). The maximum number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2003 ESPP is nine million shares. On February 27, 2006 an additional six million shares were reserved under the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under the 2003 ESPP, employees may purchase, on a periodic basis, a limited number of shares of common stock through payroll deductions over a six-month period. The per share purchase price is 85% of the fair market value of the stock at the beginning or end of the offering period, whichever is lower.

We have treated the Employee Stock Purchase Plan as a compensatory plan and have recorded compensation expense of approximately $1.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2005, in accordance with SFAS No. 123R.  As a result of the stock option investigation, which has recently been concluded, the Company suspended the ESPP for the six month offering period ended March 31, 2007.  The Company did not record compensation expense for ESPP during the three months ended December 30, 2006.

8




The assumptions used for the three months ended December 31, 2005 are presented below:

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

Volatility

 

51.0

%

Risk-free interest rate

 

4.37

%

Dividend yield

 

0

%

Expected life

 

0.75 years

 

 

Restricted Stock Awards

We grant awards of restricted stock to executive officers, directors and certain management employees. These awards vest at various periods ranging from one to four years.

Compensation expense computed for the three months ended December 30, 2006, was approximately $1.5 million. Compensation expense computed for the three months ended December 31, 2005 (restated) was approximately $1.9 million.

There were no restricted stock awards granted during the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.  At December 30, 2006, unrecognized cost related to restricted stock awards totaled approximately $8.3 million. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.82 years.

During the three months ended December 31, 2005, a one-time, non-cash benefit of approximately $5.4 million (restated) for estimated future forfeitures of restricted stock awards previously expensed was recorded as of the SFAS No. 123R implementation date and reported as a cumulative effect of accounting change. Pursuant to APB No. 25, stock compensation expense was not reduced for estimated future forfeitures, but instead was reversed upon actual forfeiture.

A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested restricted shares for the three months ended December 30, 2006 is presented below:

 

Number of Shares

 

Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value

 

 

 

 

 

($)

 

Nonvested at September 30, 2006

 

3,038,490

 

10.43

 

Granted

 

 

 

Vested

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

(100,000

)

11.67

 

Nonvested at December 30, 2006

 

2,938,490

 

10.38

 

 

Restricted Stock Units

During fiscal year 2006, the Company began issuing restricted stock units to executive officers, directors and certain management employees. These awards cliff vest at four years. The units are automatically exchanged for shares at the vesting date.

Compensation expense computed under the fair value method for the three months ended December 30, 2006, was approximately $264,000. Compensation expense computed under the fair value method for the three months ended December 31, 2005 (restated), was approximately $5,000.

There were no restricted stock units granted during the three months ended December 30, 2006. During the three months ended December 31, 2005 (restated), there were 50,000 shares of restricted stock units granted and the weighted-average grant date fair value of the restricted stock units was $4.00. At December 30, 2006, unrecognized cost related to restricted stock units totaled approximately $6.3 million. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.29 years.

9




A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested restricted share units for the three months ended December 30, 2006 are presented below:

 

Number of
Shares

 

Weighted-
Grant Date
Fair Value

 

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic

 

 

 

 

 

($)

 

(Years)

 

($)

 

Non-vested restricted stock units at September 30, 2006

 

1,526,500

 

4.79

 

3.54

 

5,709,110

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled

 

(41,250

)

4.06

 

 

 

 

 

Non-vested restricted stock units at December 30, 2006

 

1,485,250

 

4.10

 

3.29

 

5,124,112

 

Non-vested restricted stock units expected to vest at
December 30, 2006

 

816,888

 

4.10

 

3.29

 

2,818,262

 

 

Performance Restricted Share Plan

During the three months ended December 31, 2005, the Company’s Compensation Committee approved the issuance of approximately 2.5 million performance restricted units at a weighted-average grant date fair value of $4.02 per unit to selected executives and other key employees. The units are automatically exchanged for vested shares when certain performance targets are met.

The Company did not record any compensation expense related to the performance restricted shares for the three months ended December 30, 2006 as the Company did not meet the prescribed performance levels. The total unrecognized compensation expense to be recognized over the remaining two years would be approximately $7.5 million, assuming the performance targets are achieved.

Note 3.  Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We enter into short-term foreign currency forward contracts to hedge currency exposures associated with certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. These contracts typically have maturities of three months or less. At December 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006, we had open forward contracts to exchange various foreign currencies for U.S. dollars in the aggregate notional amount of $380.8 million and $403.4 million, respectively. The net unrealized loss on the contracts at December 30, 2006 was not material and was recorded in accrued liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Realized gains and losses on forward exchange contracts are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations as offsets to the exchange gains and losses on the hedged transactions. The impact of these foreign exchange contracts was not material to the results of operations for the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

We also utilized foreign currency forward and option contracts to hedge certain forecasted foreign currency sales and cost of sales referred to as cash flow hedges. These contracts typically expire within 12 months. Gains and losses on these contracts related to the effective portion of the hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income until the forecasted transactions impact earnings. When the contracts expire, any amounts recorded in other comprehensive income are reclassified to earnings. Gains and losses related to the ineffective portion of the hedges are immediately recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. At December 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006, we had forward and option contracts related to cash flow hedges in various foreign currencies in the aggregate notional amount of $70.5 million and $10.1 million, respectively. The net unrealized gain on the contracts at December 30, 2006 was not material and was recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The impact of the foreign currency forward and option contracts was not material to the results of operations for the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

We entered into interest rate swaps to hedge our mix of short-term and long-term interest rate exposures. The aggregate notional amount of the combined swap transactions is $400.0 million. At December 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006, $17.5 million and $17.1 million, respectively, have been recorded in other long-term liabilities to record the fair value of the interest rate swap transactions, with a corresponding decrease to the carrying value of the 6.75% Notes on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

10




Our foreign exchange forward and option contracts and interest rate swaps expose us to credit risk to the extent that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreement. We minimize such risk by limiting our counterparties to major financial institutions. We do not expect material losses as a result of default by counterparties.

Note 4.  Inventories

The components of inventories, net of provisions, are as follows:

 

 

As of

 

 

 

December 30,
2006

 

September 30,
2006

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Raw materials

 

$

921,016

 

$

905,236

 

Work-in-process

 

250,018

 

262,449

 

Finished goods

 

157,107

 

150,715

 

Total

 

$

1,328,141

 

$

1,318,400

 

 

Note 5.  Goodwill and Other Intangibles Assets

On a consolidated basis, goodwill increased from $1,613 million to $1,618 million primarily as a result of translation adjustments.

Goodwill information for each reporting unit is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

As of
September 30,
2006

 

Additions 
to
Goodwill

 

As of
December 30,
2006

 

Reporting units:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Standard Electronic Manufacturing Services

 

$

1,524,099

 

$

4,857

 

$

1,528,956

 

Personal Computing

 

89,131

 

 

89,131

 

Total

 

$

1,613,230

 

$

4,857

 

$

1,618,087

 

 

The gross and net carrying values of other intangible assets at December 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

As of December 30, 2006

 

As of September 30, 2006

 

 

 

Gross
Carrying
Amount

 

Impairment
of
Intangibles

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net
Carrying
Amount

 

Gross
Carrying
Amount

 

Impairment
of
Intangibles

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net
Carrying
Amount

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

Other intangible assets

 

$

72,106

 

$

(7,928

)

$

(36,254

)

$

27,924

 

$

72,106

 

$

(7,928

)

$

(34,376

)

$

29,802

 

 

The decrease in other intangible assets from September 30, 2006 to December 30, 2006 was due to amortization of approximately $1.9 million.

Estimated annual amortization expense for other intangible assets at December 30, 2006 is as follows:

Fiscal Years:

 

(In thousands)

 

2007 (remainder)

 

$

5,653

 

2008

 

7,537

 

2009

 

4,992

 

2010

 

2,958

 

2011

 

2,957

 

Thereafter

 

3,827

 

 

 

$

27,924

 

 

11




Note 6.  Comprehensive Income

SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, establishes standards for the reporting of comprehensive income and its components. SFAS No. 130 requires companies to report “comprehensive income” that includes unrealized holding gains and losses and other items that have previously been excluded from net income and reflected instead in stockholders’ equity.

The components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were as follows:

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30,
2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Net income

 

$

28,249

 

$

17,394

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

5,755

 

(11,047

)

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments

 

 

(233

)

Minimum pension liability

 

348

 

17

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

34,352

 

$

6,131

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax as applicable, consists of the following:

 

As of

 

 

 

December 30,
2006

 

September 30,
2006

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

$

52,918

 

$

47,164

 

Minimum pension liability

 

(4,208

)

(4,556

)

Total accumulated other comprehensive income

 

$

48,710

 

$

42,608

 

 

12




Note 7.  Earnings Per Share

 Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes dilutive common stock equivalents, using the treasury stock method, and assumes that the convertible debt instruments were converted into common stock upon issuance, if dilutive. While the conceptual computation of earnings per share is not changed by SFAS No. 123R (“Share-Based Payment”), the inclusion of compensation cost will affect the mechanics of the calculation. The compensation cost will be recognized under SFAS No. 123R only for awards that are expected to vest (determined by applying the pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumption), all options or shares outstanding that have not been forfeited would be included in diluted earnings per share. The amount of stock-based compensation cost in the numerator includes a forfeiture rate assumption while the number of shares in the denominator does not.

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted income per share:

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30,
2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

Income before cumulative effect of accounting change

 

$

28,249

 

$

11,699

 

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax

 

 

5,695

 

Net income

 

$

28,249

 

$

17,394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares—basic

 

527,110

 

524,311

 

Effect of dilutive potential common shares

 

1,188

 

383

 

Weighted average number of shares—diluted

 

528,298

 

524,694

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income per share before cumulative effect of accounting change

 

 

 

 

 

—basic

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.02

 

—diluted

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.02

 

Net income per share

 

 

 

 

 

—basic

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.03

 

—diluted

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.03

 

 

The following table summarizes the weighted average dilutive securities that were excluded from the above computation of diluted net income per share because their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect:

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30,
2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

Employee stock options

 

47,765,404

 

53,306,804

 

Restricted stock

 

1,348,107

 

3,488,193

 

Shares issuable upon conversion of 3% notes

 

12,697,848

 

12,697,848

 

Shares issuable upon conversion of 4% notes

 

 

6,269

 

Total anti-dilutive shares

 

61,811,359

 

69,499,114

 

 

After-tax interest expense of $2.7 million related to the Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Debentures and 3% Convertible Subordinated Notes for the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted income per share because to do so would be anti-dilutive. In addition, the related share equivalents on conversion of the debt were not included as to do so would be anti-dilutive.

13




Note 8.  Debt

Senior Unsecured Term Loan.   On October 13, 2006, the Company entered into a Credit and Guaranty Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) providing for a $600.0 million senior unsecured term loan which matures on January 31, 2008. The Company drew down the $600.0 million term loan simultaneously with the closing of the transaction. A portion of the proceeds were used to effect the satisfaction and discharge of the 3% Notes. The Company intends to use the remaining proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes.

The loans will bear interest at the election of the Company at either the prime rate plus 1.5% or at an adjusted LIBOR rate plus 2.5%. On the 181st day after closing, the margins with respect to all loans will increase by 0.5% for the remaining life of the loans. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears with respect to prime rate loans. Interest is payable at the end of each interest period in the case of LIBOR rate loans depending on the Company’s election of the length of borrowing period (i.e. one month, three months or six months). Principal, together with accrued and unpaid interest, is due at maturity. In addition, the Company is required to make mandatory prepayments of principal with the net cash proceeds from the sale of certain assets and the incurrence of certain debt.

All of the Company’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries will guaranty the obligations under the Credit Agreement, subject to some limited exceptions.

The Credit Agreement contains affirmative covenants, including covenants regarding the payment of taxes and other obligations, maintenance of insurance, reporting requirements and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Further, the Credit Agreement contains negative covenants limiting the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries, among other things, to incur debt, grant liens and make certain restricted payments. The events of default under the Credit Agreement include payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other indebtedness, breaches of covenants and bankruptcy events.

As of December 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006, we had no other term loans.

8.125% Senior Subordinated Notes.   On February 15, 2006, the Company issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of 8.125% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 (the “8.125% Notes”). Interest is payable on the 8.125% Notes on March 1 and September 1 of each year, beginning on September 1, 2006. The maturity date of the 8.125% Notes is March 1, 2016. Debt issuance costs of $12.9 million are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other non-current assets and amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the debt as interest expense. The difference between the amortization calculated using the straight-line method as compared to the effective interest method was immaterial. The 8.125% Notes are unsecured and subordinated in right of payment to all of the Company’s existing and future senior debt, as defined in the indenture under which the 8.125% Notes were issued.

The Company may redeem the 8.125% Notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to March 1, 2011, at a redemption price that is equal to the sum of (1) the principal amount of the 8.125% Notes to be redeemed, (2) accrued and unpaid interest on those 8.125% Notes to, but excluding, the redemption date and (3) a make-whole premium calculated in the manner specified in the Indenture for the 8.125% Notes. The Company may redeem the 8.125% Notes, in whole or in part, beginning on March 1, 2011, at declining redemption prices ranging from 104.063% to 100% of the principal amount of the 8.125% Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date, with the actual redemption price to be determined based on the date of redemption. At any time prior to March 1, 2009, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the 8.125% Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 108.125% of the principal amount of the 8.125% Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date, so long as after giving effect to any such redemption, at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8.125% Notes remains outstanding.

Following a change of control, as defined in the Indenture, the Company will be required to make an offer to repurchase all or any portion of the 8.125% Notes at a purchase price of 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of repurchase.

The 8.125% Notes Indenture includes covenants that limit the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: incur additional debt, make investments and other restricted payments, pay dividends on capital stock, or redeem or repurchase capital stock or subordinated obligations; create specified liens; sell assets; create or permit restrictions on the ability of the Company’s restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to the Company; engage in transactions with affiliates; incur layered debt; and consolidate or merge with or into other companies or

14




sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. The restrictive covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications set forth in the Indenture for the 8.125% Notes.

The 8.125% Notes Indenture provides for customary events of default, including:

·  payment defaults;

·  breaches of covenants;

·  certain payment defaults at final maturity or acceleration of certain other indebtedness;

·  failure to pay certain judgments;

·  certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency and reorganization; and

·  certain instances in which a guarantee ceases to be in full force and effect.

If any event of default occurs and is continuing, subject to certain exceptions, the trustee or the holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding 8.125% Notes may declare all the 8.125% Notes to be due and payable immediately, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the acceleration date. In the case of an event of default resulting from certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization, such amounts with respect to the 8.125% Notes will be due and payable immediately without any declaration or other act on the part of the trustee or the holders of the 8.125% Notes.

On January 3, 2007, the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, entered into a supplemental indenture to the indenture under which the Company’s 8.125% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 were issued. As permitted by the indenture, the supplemental indenture released each of the notes guarantors from its respective obligations under its notes guarantee and the indenture.

6.75% Senior Subordinated Notes.   On February 24, 2005, the Company issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of our 6.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (the “6.75% Notes”). Interest is payable on the 6.75% Notes on March 1 and September 1 of each year, beginning on September 1, 2005. The maturity date of the 6.75% Notes is March 1, 2013. In June 2005, we completed an exchange offer pursuant to which substantially all of the 6.75% Notes were exchanged for notes registered under the Securities Act of 1933. These notes evidence the same debt as the original 6.75% Notes and are issued and entitled to the benefits of the same indenture that governs the original the 6.75% Notes except that they are not subject to transfer restrictions.

The 6.75% Notes are unsecured and subordinated in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior debt as defined in the 6.75% Notes Indenture. We may redeem the 6.75% Notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to March 1, 2009, at a redemption price that is equal to the sum of (1) the principal amount of the 6.75% Notes to be redeemed, (2) accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date on those 6.75% Notes and (3) a make-whole premium calculated in the manner specified in the 6.75% Notes Indenture. We may redeem the 6.75% Notes, in whole or in part, beginning on March 1, 2009, at declining redemption prices ranging from 103.375% to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date, with the actual redemption price to be determined based on the date of redemption. At any time prior to March 1, 2008, we may redeem up to 35% of the 6.75% Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 106.75% of the principal amount of the 6.75% Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date, so long as after giving effect to any such redemption, at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 6.75% Notes remains outstanding.

Following a change of control, as defined in the 6.75% Notes Indenture, we will be required to make an offer to repurchase all or any portion of the 6.75% Notes at a purchase price of 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of repurchase.

The 6.75% Notes Indenture includes covenants that limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: incur additional debt, make investments and other restricted payments, pay dividends on capital stock, or redeem or repurchase capital stock or subordinated obligations; create specified liens; sell assets; create or permit restrictions on the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us; engage in transactions with affiliates; incur layered debt; and consolidate or merge with or into other companies or sell all or substantially all of our assets. The restricted covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications set forth in the 6.75% Notes Indenture.

The 6.75% Notes Indenture provides for customary events of default, including payment defaults, breaches of covenants, certain payment defaults at final maturity or acceleration of certain other indebtedness, failure to pay certain judgments, certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency and reorganization and certain instances in which a guarantee ceases to

15




be in full force and effect. If any event of default occurs and is continuing, subject to certain exceptions, the trustee or the holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding 6.75% Notes may declare all the 6.75% Notes to be due and payable immediately, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the acceleration date. In the case of an event of default resulting from certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization, such amounts with respect to the 6.75% Notes will be due and payable immediately without any declaration or other act on the part of the trustee or the holders of the 6.75% Notes.

On January 3, 2007, the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, entered into a supplemental indenture to the indenture under which the Company’s 6.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 were issued. As permitted by the indenture, the supplemental indenture released each of the notes guarantors from its respective obligations under its notes guarantee and the indenture.”

8.125% and 6.75% Senior Subordinated Notes.   On September 6, 2006, the Company completed its consent solicitation from the holders of its 6.75% Notes and from the holders of its 8.125% Notes. Holders of a majority of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of its 6.75% Notes and 8.125% Notes submitted, and did not revoke, letters of consent prior to expiration of the consent solicitation period. Pursuant to the consent, the Company received a waiver, until December 14, 2006, of any default or event of default under the terms of the indentures governing such notes that may arise by virtue of the Company’s failure to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and furnish to the trustee and holders of such notes certain reports required to be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company incurred $12.5 million in aggregate consent fees. These fees have been capitalized and are being amortized over the remaining life of the 6.75% Notes and 8.125% Notes, respectively. The waiver for each series of notes became effective following the payment of the consent fee to each consenting holder of such series of notes, which the Company paid on September 11, 2006. The Company filed Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 2006. As a result of filing the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2006 before December 14, 2006, the Company was not in default under the terms of the indentures governing such notes as of December 14, 2006.   The Company was also delayed in its filing of the Form 10-K for 2006. This non-compliance matter was cured on January 3, 2007 when the Company filed its 2006 Form 10-K.

10.375% Senior Secured Notes due 2010.   On December 23, 2002, we issued $750.0 million of 10.375% Senior Secured Notes due January 15, 2010 (the “10.375% Notes”) in a private placement to qualified investors as part of a refinancing transaction pursuant to which we also entered into a $275.0 million senior secured credit facility. On February 28, 2006, the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation (the “Offer to Purchase”) for any or all of the Company’s $750 million 10.375% Notes expired. The total consideration was $1,103.17, which represented the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 10.375% Notes due on January 15, 2007 (which is the earliest redemption date for the 10.375% Notes) determined using a discount factor equal to the yield on the Price Determination Date of February 13, 2006 of the 3% U.S. Treasury Notes due December 31, 2006 plus 50 basis points and included a consent fee and accrued and unpaid interest. In conjunction with the offer, the Company solicited consents to proposed amendments to the indenture governing the 10.375% Notes, which eliminated substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default in the indenture. The Company offered a consent payment (which is included in the total consideration described above) of $30.00 per $1,000 principal amount of 10.375% Notes to holders who validly tendered their 10.375% Notes and delivered their consents prior to the Consent Payment Deadline of February 13, 2006. Holders who tendered their 10.375% Notes after the Consent Payment Deadline but prior to the expiration date received total consideration referred to above, less the consent payment, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the payment date.

As a result of the Company’s offer to purchase the 10.375% Notes on January 31, 2006, the Company purchased approximately $721.7 million in aggregate principal. All of the net proceeds of $587 million from the issuance of the 8.125% Notes, together with approximately $239.2 million cash on hand were used to repurchase the 10.375% Notes. Additionally, in connection with the termination of the interest rate swap related to the 10.375% Notes, the Company released $22.5 million in restricted cash.

On February 16, 2006, the Company called for redemption on March 20, 2006 (the “Redemption Date”) of all the remaining outstanding 10.375% Notes. The aggregate principal amount to be redeemed was approximately $28.3 million. The total consideration amount of $1,108.56 for each $1,000 principal amount was calculated based on the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to but excluding the redemption date, plus the make-whole premium, totaling approximately $31.3 million. In the aggregate, the 10.375% Notes were redeemed in full on March 20, 2006, and no further interest was accrued.

The Company recorded a loss of approximately $84.6 million from the early extinguishment of the $750 million 10.375% Notes which is comprised of approximately $70.8 million of redemption premium, $2.2 million related to interest

16




rate swap termination, $13.9 million unamortized finance fees relating to the 10.375% Notes and $0.9 million of tender expenses offset by $3.2 million unamortized gain from previously terminated swaps. The loss on debt extinguishment was included in other income (expense), net.

3% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2007.   In March 2000, SCI issued $575.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3% Convertible Subordinated Notes due March 15, 2007, or 3% Notes. Interest on the 3% Notes is payable semi-annually on each March 15 and September 15. In connection with the merger with SCI, the Company entered into a supplemental indenture with respect to the 3% Notes providing a guaranty for the 3% Notes and allowing for the conversion of the 3% Notes into shares of our common stock, at a conversion price of $41.35 per share, subject to adjustment in certain events. The 3% Notes were subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior debt, as defined, of the Company. The 3% Notes were redeemable at SCI’s option at any time on or after March 20, 2003, although there was no mandatory redemption prior to final maturity. During fiscal 2003, the Company repurchased approximately $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 3% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2007 through unsolicited privately negotiated transactions.

On October 13, 2006, SCI Systems, Inc., one of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries (“SCI Systems”), initiated, in accordance with the terms thereof, the satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture, dated as of March 15, 2000, by and between SCI Systems and The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association, as trustee (as supplemented, the “Indenture”), pursuant to which SCI Systems issued its 3% Notes due 2007. As a result, $532.9 million in cash was deposited with the trustee, which is equal to the principal and interest due on the 3% Notes at maturity on March 15, 2007. The net proceeds obtained from the Senior Unsecured Term Loan (see below) which is due in January 2008 were used to initiate the satisfaction and discharge of the 3% Notes.  Although the Company has satisfied its obligation in accordance with the Indenture, it has not legally been discharged from this obligation. As a result the $532.9 million was classified as restricted cash and classified in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements at a current asset as the loan will be repaid in full on March 15, 2007.

Senior Credit Facility.   On October 26, 2004, we entered into a Credit and Guaranty Agreement (the “Original Credit Agreement”) providing for a $500 million senior secured revolving credit facility with a $150 million letter of credit sub-limit. The senior secured credit facility provided for a maturity date of October 26, 2007. We entered into an Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2005, among us, certain of our subsidiaries, as guarantors, and the lenders that are parties thereto from time to time (the “Restated Credit Agreement”). The Restated Credit Agreement amended and restated the Original Credit Agreement among other things, to:

·  Extend the maturity date from October 26, 2007 to December 16, 2008;

·  Amend the leverage ratio;

·      Permit us and the guarantors to sell domestic receivables pursuant to factoring or similar arrangements if certain conditions are met; and

·  Revise the collateral release provisions.

All of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries guaranty the obligations under the Restated Credit Agreement, subject to some limited exceptions. Our obligations and the obligations of our subsidiaries under the credit facility are secured by: substantially all of our assets; substantially all of the assets of substantially all of our United States subsidiaries located in the United States; a pledge of all capital stock of substantially all of our United States subsidiaries; a pledge of 65% of the capital stock of certain of our and our United States subsidiaries’ first-tier foreign subsidiaries; and mortgages on certain domestic real estate.

The Restated Credit Agreement provides for the collateral to be released at such time as our 10.375% Notes have been substantially paid in full, we have satisfied our obligations with respect to the Zero Coupon Subordinated Debentures described above, our long-term unsecured noncredit enhanced debt is rated not less than BB by Standard & Poor’s and Ba2 by Moody’s and we are in pro forma compliance with the financial covenants contained in the credit facility.

The Restated Credit Agreement requires us to comply with a fixed charge coverage ratio and a ratio of total debt to earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). Additionally, the credit facility contains numerous affirmative covenants, including covenants regarding the payment of taxes and other obligations, maintenance of insurance, reporting requirements and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Further, the credit facility contains negative covenants limiting the ability of us and our subsidiaries, among other things, to incur debt, grant liens, make acquisitions, make certain restricted payments, sell assets and enter into sale and lease back transactions. The events of default under the credit facility include payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other indebtedness, breaches of covenants and bankruptcy events.

17




At any time the aggregate face amount of receivables sold by us and the guarantors together with any outstanding amounts exceeds the thresholds set forth in the Restated Credit Agreement, the revolving credit commitments for purposes of making loans and issuing letters of credit will be zero. The Restated Credit Agreement provides for the release of the security interests in our and the guarantors’ accounts receivable at such time as specified conditions are met, including that we have paid at least 85% of the original principal amount of our 10.375% Senior Subordinated Notes, the liens granted there under have been released and our credit ratings meet specified thresholds. The Restated Credit Agreement provides for the collateral (other than stock pledges and other collateral we request not to be released) to be released at such time as specified conditions are met, including that we have paid at least 85% of the principal amount of the SCI Systems 3% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2007 and our credit ratings meet specified thresholds. If following the release of any portion of the collateral pursuant to the provisions of the credit agreement described above, our credit ratings fall below specified thresholds, then we are required to take such actions as are necessary to grant and perfect a security interest in the assets and properties that would at that time comprise the collateral if the relevant collateral documents were still in effect.

On June 30, 2006, the Company entered into an amendment to the Restated Credit Agreement related to accounts receivable which made some modifications to certain definitions and one of the negative covenants on liens.

On August 10, 2006, the Company entered into a Letter Waiver (“Credit Agreement Waiver Letter”) with the lenders under its Restated Credit Agreement which waiver was extended multiple times pursuant to a Letter Waiver Extension entered into most recently on December 7, 2006 (the “December Waiver”). Pursuant to the December Waiver, the lenders under the Restated Credit Agreement waived compliance by the Company with the requirements of the Restated Credit Agreement to deliver financial statements and the compliance certificate for the quarter ended July 1, 2006 and any cross defaults with other indebtedness that may arise from such failure through December 14, 2006. The December Waiver provided the waiver termination date for the Credit Agreement Waiver Letter to December 14, 2006, provided, that if the required date of delivery of the financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2006 under the Company’s 8.125% Notes and 6.75% Notes has been extended (by waiver or otherwise) beyond December 14, 2006, the waiver terminates on the earlier of (i) March 31, 2007 and (ii) the third business day preceding the required date of delivery beyond December 14, 2006 for such financial statements as provided in the initial extension thereof by the respective requisite holders of such Notes. The Company filed Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 2006. As a result of filing the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2006 before December 14, 2006, the Company was not in default under the terms of the indentures governing such notes as of December 14, 2006. The Company was also delayed in its filing of the Form 10-K for 2006. This non-compliance matter was cured on January 3, 2007 when the Company filed its 2006 Form 10-K.

In addition, the December Waiver waived compliance by the Company with the requirements of the Restated Credit Agreement to deliver financial statements, related reports and a compliance certificate for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 and any cross defaults with other indebtedness that may arise from such failure through January 10, 2007, provided, that if the required date of delivery of the financial statements for the 2006 fiscal year under the Company’s 8.125% Notes and the 6.75% Notes has been extended (by waiver or otherwise) beyond January 10, 2007, the earlier of (i) March 31, 2007 or (ii) the third business day preceding the required date of delivery beyond January 10, 2007 for such financial statements as provided in the initial extension thereof by the respective holders of such Notes. During the same period, the lenders waived compliance with certain conditions to extensions of credit under the Restated Credit Agreement.

On October 13, 2006, the Company and the required lenders entered into an amendment for its Restated Credit Agreement.  Pursuant to the amendment, certain amendments were made to the Restated Credit Agreement to permit the transactions contemplated by the Credit and Guaranty Agreement described below. The amendment also revised the collateral release provision under the Restated Credit Agreement such that collateral (other than stock pledges and other collateral we request not to be released) to be released at such time as specified conditions are met, including that we have repaid in full the outstanding amount under the Credit and Guaranty Agreement and our credit ratings meets specified thresholds.

On December 29, 2006, the Company entered into an amendment and waiver to the Restated Credit Agreement. Among other things, this amendment amended the minimum required levels for both financial covenants and certain related definitions.  The fees in regards to the amendment and waiver were deferred and amortize over the debt period.  The amount of the fees was immaterial to the financial statements.

18




There was approximately $100 million of loans outstanding under the Restated Credit Agreement at an average interest rate of 8.75% as of December 30, 2006. Additionally, the Company pays a commitment fee of 0.35% on the unused portion of the credit facility.

The Company is in compliance with its covenants for the above debt instruments.

Note 9.  Sale of Accounts Receivable

Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries have entered into agreements that permit them to sell specified accounts receivable. The purchase price for receivables sold under these Agreements range from 95% to 100% of its face amount less a discount charge (based on LIBOR plus a percentage ranging from 0.4% to 1.5%) for the period from the date the receivable is sold to its collection date. Accounts receivable sales under these Agreements were $478.4 million and $348.2 million for the three month periods ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The sold receivables are subject to certain limited recourse provisions. In accordance with SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liability,” accounts receivable sold will be removed from the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and will be reflected as cash provided by operating activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. As of December 30, 2006, $249.1 million of sold accounts receivable remain subject to certain recourse provisions. We have not experienced any credit losses under these recourse provisions. The discount charge recorded during the period was not material to the financial statements. The discount charge is recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

As part of the sale of accounts receivables, the Company had a retained interest of $10.2 million at December 30, 2006. There was no retained interest at December 31, 2005. The accounts receivable relating to this retained interest was reclassified from accounts receivable to prepaid and other current assets. The retained interest has subsequently been collected.

Note 10.  Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation and other contingencies.   The Company is involved in a shareholder derivative actions and a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Informal Inquiry, and has received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s office in connection with certain historical stock option grants. Presently, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these investigations.

From time to time, we are a party to litigation and other contingencies, including examinations by taxing authorities, which arise in the ordinary course of business. We believe that the resolution of such litigation and other contingencies will not materially harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.

19




Note 11.  Restructuring Costs

In recent periods, we have initiated restructuring plans as a result of the slowdown in the global electronics industry and the worldwide economy. These plans were designed to reduce excess capacity and affected facilities across all services offered in our vertically integrated manufacturing organization. The majority of the restructuring charges recorded as a result of these plans related to facilities located in North America and Europe, and in general, manufacturing activities at these plants were transferred to other facilities.

Costs associated with restructuring activities initiated on or after January 1, 2003, other than those activities related to purchase business combinations, are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 146 and SFAS No. 112 where applicable. Pursuant to SFAS No. 112, restructuring costs related to employee severance are recorded when probable and estimable. For all other restructuring costs a liability is recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 146 only when incurred. Accrued restructuring costs are included in accrued liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Below is a summary of the activity related to restructuring costs recorded pursuant to SFAS No. 146 and SFAS No. 112 through the first quarter of fiscal year 2007:

 

Employee
Termination
Benefits

 

Lease and
Contract
Termination
Costs

 

Other
Restructuring
Costs

 

Impairment
of Fixed
Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

Cash

 

Cash

 

Non-Cash

 

Total

 

Balance at October 2, 2004

 

$

15,496

 

$

1,587

 

$

42

 

$

 

$

17,125

 

Charges to operations

 

84,451

 

14,070

 

6,404

 

6,932

 

111,857

 

Charges utilized

 

(64,823

)

(12,533

)

(6,446

)

(6,932

)

(90,734

)

Reversal of accrual

 

(2,508

)

 

 

 

(2,508

)

Balance at October 1, 2005

 

32,616

 

3,124

 

 

 

35,740

 

Charges to operations

 

95,563

 

1,306

 

12,956

 

24,165

 

133,990

 

Charges utilized

 

(96,738

)

(1,732

)

(13,206

)

(24,165

)

(135,841

)

Reversal of accrual

 

(4,790

)

 

(40

)

 

(4,830

)

Balance at September 30, 2006

 

26,651

 

2,698

 

(290

)

 

29,059

 

Charges to operations

 

2,871

 

 

3,292

 

87

 

6,250

 

Charges utilized

 

(17,427

)

(334

)

(3,002

)

(87

)

(20,850

)

Balance at December 30, 2006

 

$

12,095

 

$

2,364

 

$

 

$

 

$

14,459

 

 

During the three month period ended December 30, 2006, we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $6.3 million related to restructuring activities pursuant to SFAS No. 146 and SFAS No. 112. These charges included employee termination benefits of approximately $2.9 million, other restructuring costs of approximately $3.3 million, incurred primarily to prepare facilities for closure, and impairment of fixed assets of approximately $87,000 pursuant to SFAS No. 144, “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets”, mainly consisting of a building complex in one of our European facilities.  These facilities have been reclassified as assets held for sale and included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the quarter, we sold one of our European facilities previously classified as assets held for sale to a group of our former employees for a net gain of approximately $6.0 million which is recorded in other income (expense), net, on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. As part of this transaction, we entered into a supply agreement in regards to receiving manufacturing services from the buyer.  The employee termination benefits were related to involuntary termination of employees, the majority of which were involved in manufacturing activities. Approximately $17.4 million of employee termination benefits were utilized and 2,739 employees were terminated during the three months ended December 30, 2006 pursuant to the restructuring plan. We also utilized $334,000 of lease and contract termination costs and $3.0 million of the other restructuring costs during the three month period ended December 30, 2006.  We expect to pay the balance of the employee termination benefits in the near term and the accrued lease costs will be paid over the next four years.

In fiscal 2006, we recorded charges of approximately $129.1 million (net of $4.8 million reversal of accrual) related to restructuring activities pursuant to SFAS No. 146 and SFAS No. 112, all of which related to our restructuring plan. These charges included employee termination benefits of approximately $95.6 million, lease and contract termination costs of approximately $1.3 million, other restructuring costs of approximately $13.0 million, incurred primarily to prepare facilities for closure, and impairment of fixed assets of approximately $24.2 million consisting of excess facilities and equipment to be disposed of. The employee termination benefits were related to the involuntary termination of employees, the majority of which were involved in manufacturing activities. Approximately $97.0 million of employee termination benefits were

20




utilized and a total of approximately 15,042 employees were terminated during fiscal 2006. We also utilized $1.7 million of lease and contract termination costs and $13.2 million of the other restructuring costs (other facilities charges) during fiscal 2006. We incurred charges to operations of $24.1 million during fiscal 2006 for the impairment of excess fixed assets at the vacated facilities, all of which were utilized as of September 30, 2006. We reversed approximately $4.8 million of accrued employee termination benefits. The reversal of accrual was primarily a result of the changes in estimates.

In fiscal 2005, we recorded charges of approximately $109.3 million (net of $2.5 million reversal of accrual) related to restructuring activities pursuant to SFAS No. 146 and SFAS No. 112, of which $106.3 million related to our phase three restructuring plan and $3.0 million related to our phase two restructuring plan. These charges included employee termination benefits of approximately $84.5 million, lease and contract termination costs of approximately $14.1 million, other restructuring costs of approximately $6.4 million, incurred primarily to prepare facilities for closure, and impairment of fixed assets of approximately $6.9 million consisting of excess facilities and equipment to be disposed of. The employee termination benefits were related to the involuntary termination of employees, the majority of which were involved in manufacturing activities. Approximately $64.8 million of employee termination benefits were utilized and a total of approximately 11,800 employees were terminated during fiscal 2005. We also utilized $12.5 million of lease and contract termination costs and $6.4 million of the other restructuring costs (other facilities charges) during fiscal 2005. We incurred charges to operations of $6.9 million during fiscal 2005 for the impairment of excess fixed assets at the vacated facilities, all of which were utilized as of October 1, 2005. We reversed approximately $2.5 million of accrued employee termination benefits. The reversal of accrual was a result of the changes in estimates and economic circumstances in one of our European entities.

Costs associated with restructuring activities initiated prior to January 1, 2003, other than those activities related to purchase business combinations, are accounted for in accordance with EITF 94-3 and SFAS 112 where applicable. Accordingly, costs associated with such plans are recorded as restructuring costs in the consolidated statements of operations generally at the commitment date. The accrued restructuring costs are included in “accrued liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheet. Below is a summary of the activity related to restructuring costs recorded pursuant to EITF 94-3 and SFAS No. 112 through the first quarter of fiscal year 2007:

 

Employee
Severance and
Related
Expenses

 

Leases and Facilities
Shutdown and
Consolidation
Costs

 

Write-off
Impaired or
Redundant
Fixed Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

Cash

 

Non-Cash

 

Total

 

Balance at October 2, 2004

 

$

1,227

 

$

14,925

 

$

 

$

16,152

 

Charges to operations

 

2,285

 

2,522

 

4,107

 

8,914

 

Charges utilized

 

(3,010

)

(7,890

)

(4,107

)

(15,007

)

Balance at October 1, 2005

 

502

 

9,557

 

 

10,059

 

Charges to operations

 

1,549

 

2,577

 

(136

)

3,990

 

Charges utilized

 

(545

)

(4,424

)

136

 

(4,833

)

Reversal of accrual

 

(51

)

(420

)

 

(471

)

Balance at September 30, 2006

 

1,455

 

7,290

 

 

8,745

 

Charges to operations

 

 

191

 

237

 

428

 

Charges utilized

 

(23

)

(981

)

(237

)

(1,241

)

Reversal of accrual

 

(266

)

 

 

(266

)

Balance at December 30, 2006

 

$

1,166

 

$

6,500

 

$

 

$

7,666

 

 

The following sections separately present the charges to the restructuring liability and charges utilized that are set forth in the above table on an aggregate basis.  We expect to pay the balance of the employee termination benefits in the near term and the accrued lease costs will be paid over the next four years.

Fiscal 2002 Plans

September 2002 Restructuring.  During the three month period ended December 30, 2006, we recorded charges to operations of approximately $114,000 and utilized approximately $827,000 of accrued costs related to the shutdown of facilities.  Approximately $34,000 gain was incurred to operations due to disposal of fixed assets.  There were no employees terminated during the three month period ended December 30, 2006 pursuant to this restructuring plan.

21




In fiscal 2006, we recorded charges to operations of approximately $112,000 and utilized approximately $1.7 million related to the shutdown of facilities. In addition, $603,000 was charged to operations and utilized due to the impairment of fixed assets to be disposed of.

In fiscal 2005, we recorded charges to operations of approximately $203,000 and utilized $216,000 for employee severance expenses. There was no reduction of work force during fiscal 2005 pursuant to this restructuring plan. During fiscal 2005, we also recorded charges to operations of approximately $544,000 and utilized approximately $2.7 million for non-cancelable lease payments, lease termination costs and related costs for the shutdown of facilities. In addition, $800,000 was charged to operations and utilized due to the impairment of fixed assets to be disposed of. The closing of the plants discussed above as well as employee terminations and other related activities have been completed, however, the leases of the related facilities expire in 2009; therefore, the remaining accrual will be reduced over time as the lease payments, net of sublease income, are made.

 October 2001 Restructuring.  During the three month period ended December 30, 2006, we incurred and utilized approximately $52,000 charges related to the shutdown of facilities.  Approximately $22,000 employee termination benefits were utilized.  We also reversed approximately $266,000 of accrued employee termination benefits due to the changes in estimates and economic circumstances.

In fiscal 2005, we recorded charges to operations of approximately $2.0 million for employee severance costs, of which $1.9 million was related to the settlement of pension plan at a Canadian site. We also recorded approximately $82,000 for non-cancelable lease payments and other costs related to the shutdown of facilities. We utilized accrued severance charges of approximately $2.7 million and accrued facilities shutdown related charges of $811,000 during fiscal 2005. In addition, we incurred and utilized charges of $633,000 in fiscal 2005 related to write-offs of fixed assets consisting of excess equipment and leasehold improvements to facilities that were permanently vacated. Manufacturing activities at the facilities affected by this plan ceased in fiscal year 2003 or prior; however, final payments of accrued costs may not occur until later periods.

Fiscal 2001 Plans

Segerström Restructuring.   In fiscal 2005, we completed the restructuring activities at a cost of $835,000 which was related to accrued facility charges.

July 2001 Restructuring.  During the three month period ended December 30, 2006, we recorded approximately $31,000 and utilized approximately $102,000 of accrued costs related to the shutdown of facilities.  We also recorded charges to operations and fully utilized $271,000 for write-off of impaired fixed assets.

In fiscal 2006, we recorded approximately $1.5 million of accrued severance for our Mexican facilities. In addition, we recorded approximately $2.3 million and utilized $2.6 million of accrued costs related to the shutdown of facilities. We also incurred and utilized $234,000 for the impairment of fixed assets to be disposed of. Manufacturing activities at the plants affected by this plan had ceased by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002; however, the leases of the related facilities expire between 2005 and 2010, therefore, the remaining accrual will be reduced over time as the lease payments, net of sublease income, are made.

In fiscal 2005, we recorded approximately $43,000 and utilized approximately $100,000 of accrued severance. In addition, we recorded approximately $1.9 million and utilized approximately $3.5 million of accrued costs related to the shutdown of facilities. We also incurred and utilized $2.7 million for the impairment of fixed assets to be disposed of. Manufacturing activities at the plants affected by this plan had ceased by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002; however, the leases of the related facilities expire between 2005 and 2010, therefore, the remaining accrual will be reduced over time as the lease payments, net of sublease income, as made.

The sublease income in relation to all restructured facilities is approximately $347,000.

22




Cost associated with restructuring activities related to purchase business combinations are accounted for in accordance with EITF 95-3.  Below is a summary of the activity related to restructuring costs recorded pursuant to EITF 95-3 through the first quarter of fiscal year 2007:

 

Employee
Severance and
Related
Expenses

 

Facilities
Shutdown and
Consolidation
Costs

 

Write-off
Impaired or
Redundant
Fixed Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

Cash

 

Non-Cash

 

Total

 

Balance at October 2, 2004

 

$

2,084

 

$

2,178

 

$

 

$

4,262

 

Accrued utilized

 

(773

)

(393

)

 

(1,166

)

Balance at October 1, 2005

 

1,311

 

1,785

 

 

3,096

 

Charges to operations

 

114

 

125

 

 

 

239

 

Charges utilized

 

(40

)

(1,804

)

 

(1,844

)

Reversal of accrual

 

(687

)

 

 

(687

)

Balance at September 30, 2006

 

698

 

106

 

 

804

 

Charges to operations

 

 

 

(3,198

)

(3,198

)

Charges utilized

 

 

 

3,198

 

3,198

 

Balance at December 30, 2006

 

$

698

 

$

106

 

$

 

$

804

 

 

During the quarter, we sold one of our North American facilities previously classified as assets held for sale for a net gain of approximately $3.2 million.

The following sections separately present the charges to the restructuring liability and charges utilized that are set forth in the above table on an aggregate basis.

SCI Acquisition Restructuring.  During the three month period ended December 30, 2006, we recognized approximately $3.2 million recovery from the sale of one of our domestic facilities previously classified as assets held for sale.

In fiscal 2006, we utilized a total of $1.8 million of facilities-related accruals and reversed $687,000 of accrued severance due to a change in estimate.

In fiscal 2005, we utilized $731,000 related to employee severance and utilized $393,000 due to facilities shutdown.

Segments.  The following table summarizes the total restructuring costs incurred with respect to our reportable segments through the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 (in thousands):

 

December 30,
2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

Personal Computing

 

$

(1,997

)

$

20,701

 

Standard Electronic Manufacturing Services

 

5,212

 

14,927

 

Total

 

$

3,215

 

$

35,628

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

6,089

 

$

20,042

 

Non-cash

 

(2,874

)

15,586

 

Total

 

$

3,215

 

$

35,628

 

 

The cumulative restructuring costs per segment have not been disclosed as it is impractical to do so. The recognition of restructuring charges requires our management to make judgments and estimates regarding the nature, timing, and amount of costs associated with the planned exit activity, including estimating sublease income and the fair value, less selling costs, of property, plant and equipment to be disposed of. Management’s estimates of future liabilities may change, requiring us to record additional restructuring charges or reduce the amount of liabilities already recorded.

23




Note 12.  Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was approximately 23.8% and 1,030.0%, respectively. The effective rate for the three months ended December 30, 2006 differs from the same period in fiscal year 2006 due primarily to the recognition of a $27.9 million tax benefit in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 resulting from a favorable settlement with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in relation to certain U.S. tax audits.

Note 13.  Business Segment, Geographic and Customer Information

SFAS No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments, products and services, geographic areas of operations and major customers. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker or decision making group in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.

The following table presents information about reportable segments for the following fiscal periods:

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30,
2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

Standard Electronic Manufacturing Services

 

$

1,941,733

 

$

1,911,389

 

Personal Computing

 

837,057

 

950,408

 

Total net sales

 

$

2,778,790

 

$

2,861,797

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit:

 

 

 

 

 

Standard Electronic Manufacturing Services

 

$

153,256

 

$

149,252

 

Personal Computing

 

15,422

 

19,235

 

Total gross profit

 

$

168,678

 

$

168,487

 

 

For the three months ended December 30, 2006, three customers in Personal Computing accounted for 12.8%, 10.6% and 10.2%, respectively, of total consolidated revenues. For the three months ended December 31, 2005 two customers in Personal Computing accounted for 14.9% and 12.1%, respectively, of consolidated revenue. For the three month periods ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, there were no inter-segment sales between Standard Electronic Manufacturing Services and Personal Computing.

The following summarizes financial information by geographic segment:

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

$

705,742

 

$

723,301

 

International

 

2,073,048

 

2,138,496

 

Total net sales

 

$

2,778,790

 

$

2,861,797

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Income:

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

$

9,550

 

$

(16,535

)

International

 

48,983

 

48,011

 

Total operating income

 

$

58,533

 

$

31,476

 

 

24




Note 14.  Warranty Reserve

The following tables summarize the warranty reserve balance:

Balance as of
September 30,
2006

 

Additions to
Accrual

 

Accrual
Utilized

 

Balance as of
December 30,
2006

 

(in thousands)

 

$

16,442

 

$

5,137

 

$

(4,347

)

$

17,232

 

 

Balance as of
October 1,
2005

 

Additions to
Accrual

 

Accrual
Utilized

 

Balance as of
December 31,
2005

 

(in thousands)

 

$

20,867

 

$

2,938

 

$

(401

)

$

23,404

 

 

25




Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements relate to our expectations for future events and time periods. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed to be forward-looking statements, including any statements regarding trends in future revenues or results of operations, gross margin or operating margin, expenses, earnings or losses from operations, synergies or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements concerning developments, performance or industry ranking; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements regarding pending investigations, claims or disputes; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Generally, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in condition, significance, value and effect. We undertake no obligation to publicly disclose any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring subsequent to filing this report with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Overview

We are a leading independent global provider of customized, integrated electronics manufacturing services, or EMS. Our revenue is generated from sales of our services primarily to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, in the communications, personal and business computing, enterprise computing and storage, multimedia, industrial and semiconductor capital equipment, defense and aerospace, medical and automotive industries. Additionally, we are reviewing strategic alternatives in regards to the separation of our personal and business computing business.

A relatively small number of customers historically have been responsible for a significant portion of our net sales. Sales to our ten largest customers accounted for 61.1% and 64.3% of our net sales for the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Three customers accounted for 10% or more of our net sales during the three month period ended December 30, 2006, and two of our customers accounted for 10% or more of our net sales during the three months ended December 31, 2005.

In recent periods, we have generated a significant portion of our net sales from international operations. During the three month periods ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, 74.6% and 74.7%, respectively, of our consolidated net sales were derived from non-U.S. operations. The concentration of international operations has resulted from overseas acquisitions and a desire on the part of many of our customers to move production to lower cost locations in regions such as Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe. We expect this trend to continue.

Historically, we have had substantial recurring sales from existing customers. We have also expanded our customer base through acquisitions. We typically enter into supply agreements with our major OEM customers. These agreements generally have terms ranging from three to five years and cover the manufacture of a range of products. Under these agreements, a customer typically agrees to purchase its requirements for particular products in particular geographic areas from us. These agreements generally do not obligate the customer to purchase minimum quantities of products. In some circumstances our supply agreements with customers provide for cost reduction objectives during the term of the agreement.

We have experienced fluctuations in gross margins in the past and may continue to in the future. Fluctuations in our gross margins may be caused by a number of factors, including pricing, changes in product mix, competitive pressures and transition of manufacturing to lower cost locations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Condensed Consolidated Financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. We review the accounting policies used in reporting our financial results on a regular basis. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate the process used to develop estimates for certain reserves and contingent liabilities, including those related to product returns, accounts receivable, inventories, investments, intangible assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions

26




that are believed to be reasonable for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results may differ from these estimates.

For a complete description of our key critical accounting policies and estimates, refer to our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 3, 2007.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On September 13, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements”. SAB No. 108, addresses quantifying the financial statement effects of misstatements; specifically, how the effects of prior year uncorrected misstatements must be considered in quantifying misstatements in the current year financial statements. In addition, SAB No. 108 provides guidance on the correction of misstatements, including the correction of prior period financial statements for immaterial misstatements. Importantly, SAB No. 108 offers a “one-time” special transition provision for correcting certain prior year misstatements that were uncorrected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. SAB No. 108 is effective for fiscal years ended after November 15, 2006. We expect to adopt this standard at year end September 29, 2007. We are currently reviewing this pronouncement to determine the potential impact to our financial statements.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).” The statement requires an employer to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a plan’s over-funded status or a liability for a plan’s under-funded status. The measurement date of the plans’ assets and obligations that determine the funded status will be as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year. The statement will be effective as of the end of fiscal 2007. We are currently reviewing this statement to determine the potential impact to our financial position, results of operations, and related cash flows.

Summary Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, certain items in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations expressed as a percentage of net sales. The table and the discussion below should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, which appear elsewhere in this report.

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30,
2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

Net sales

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

Cost of sales

 

93.9

 

94.1

 

Gross margin

 

6.1

 

5.9

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

3.5

 

3.1

 

Research and development

 

0.3

 

0.3

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

0.1

 

0.1

 

Restructuring costs

 

0.1

 

1.3

 

Total operating expenses

 

4.0

 

4.8

 

Operating income

 

2.1

 

1.1

 

Interest income

 

0.4

 

0.2

 

Interest expense

 

(1.6

)

(1.1

)

Other income (expense), net

 

0.4

 

(0.2

)

Interest and other expense, net

 

(0.8

)

(1.1

)

Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting changes

 

1.3

 

 

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

0.3

 

(0.4

)

Income before cumulative effect of accounting change

 

1.0

 

0.4

 

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax

 

 

(0.2

)

Net income

 

1.0

%

0.6

%

 

27




The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, key operating results (in thousands):

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Net sales

 

$

2,778,790

 

$

2,861,797

 

Gross profit

 

$

168,678

 

$

168,487

 

Operating income

 

$

58,533

 

$

31,476

 

Net income

 

$

28,249

 

$

17,394

 

 

Key performance measures

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain key performance measures that management utilizes to assess operating results:

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30, 2006

 

September 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

Days sales outstanding(1)

 

50

 

51

 

51

 

Inventory turns(2)

 

7.9

 

7.9

 

9.6

 

Accounts payable days(3)

 

52

 

53

 

55

 

Cash cycle days(4)

 

45

 

44

 

33

 

 


(1)

 

Days sales outstanding is calculated as the ratio of ending accounts receivable, net, for the quarter divided by average daily net sales for the quarter.

 

 

 

(2)

 

Inventory turns are calculated as the ratio of four times our cost of sales for the quarter divided by inventory at period end.

 

 

 

(3)

 

Accounts payable days is calculated as the ratio of 365 days divided by accounts payable turns, in which accounts payable turns is calculated as the ratio of four times our cost of sales for the quarter divided by accounts payable at period end.

 

 

 

(4)

 

Cash cycle days is calculated as the ratio of 365 days divided by inventory turns plus days sales outstanding minus accounts payable days.

 

Results of Operations

Net Sales

Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased by 2.9% to $2.8 billion from $2.9 billion in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The decrease in sales was primarily due to decreased demand of approximately $113 million from our existing customers in the personal computing end market of the electronics industry, $54 million from our high-end  computing end market, $42 million from our communications end market, offset by an increase of $40 million and $42 million from our industrial instruments and consumer product businesses.

Gross Margin

Gross margin increased from 5.9% in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 to 6.1% in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The increase in gross margin for the three months ended December 30, 2006 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2005 were primarily attributable to favorable product mix, increased margins in our enclosure and industrial instrumentation businesses and lower stock-based compensation expense.  This increase is offset by decreased margin in our PCB Fabrication business and a net decrease in margin for the remaining businesses.  We expect gross margins to continue to fluctuate based on overall production and shipment volumes as well as changes in the mix of products demanded by our major customers.

28




Fluctuations in our gross margins may be caused by a number of factors, including:

·       Greater competition in the EMS and pricing pressures from OEMs due to the greater cost reduction focus of global OEMs;

·       Changes in the mix of high and low margin products demanded by our customers;

·       Changes in customer demand and sales volumes, including demand for our vertically integrated key system components and subassemblies;

·       Charges or write offs of excess and obsolete inventory that we are not able to charge back to a customer or sales of inventories previously written down;

·       Pricing pressure on electronic components resulting from economic conditions in the electronics industry, with EMS companies competing more aggressively on cost to obtain new or maintain existing business; and

·       Our ability to transition manufacturing and assembly operations to lower cost regions in an efficient manner.

We have experienced fluctuations in gross margin in the past and may continue to do so in the future.

Operating Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $6.2 million to $96.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 from $90.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased as a percentage of net sales, to 3.5% in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 from 3.1% in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The dollar increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was primarily attributable to additional expenses we incurred in connection with our investigation of stock option administration policies and procedures dating back to 1997, increased selling and marketing expenses, partially offset by decreased stock based compensation expense.  The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2006 in terms of percentage of sales was primarily attributable to increased expenses as noted above and a decrease in net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2007.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses remained relatively flat at $9.0 million for both the first quarter of fiscal 2006 and the first quarter of fiscal 2007.  Research and development as a percentage of net sales remained flat at 0.3% for both first quarters of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006.  We expect research and development expenses to decline in future periods.

Restructuring costs

In recent periods, we have initiated restructuring plans as a result of the slowdown in the global electronics industry and the worldwide economy. These plans were designed to reduce excess capacity and affected facilities across all services offered in our vertically integrated manufacturing organization. The majority of the restructuring charges recorded as a result of these plans related to facilities located in North America and Europe, and in general, manufacturing activities at these plants were transferred to other facilities.

Costs associated with restructuring activities initiated on or after January 1, 2003, other than those activities related to purchase business combinations, are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 146 and SFAS No. 112 where applicable. Pursuant to SFAS No. 112, restructuring costs related to employee severance are recorded when probable and estimable. For all other restructuring costs a liability is recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 146 only when incurred. Accrued restructuring costs are included in accrued liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Below is a summary of the activity related to restructuring costs recorded pursuant to SFAS No. 146 and SFAS No. 112 through the first quarter of fiscal year 2007:

29




 

 

 

Employee
Termination
Benefits

 

Lease and
Contract
Termination
Costs

 

Other
Restructuring
Costs

 

Impairment
of Fixed
Assets

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

Cash

 

Cash

 

Cash

 

Non-Cash

 

Total

 

Balance at October 2, 2004

 

$

15,496

 

$

1,587

 

$

42

 

$

 

$

17,125

 

Charges to operations

 

84,451

 

14,070

 

6,404

 

6,932

 

111,857

 

Charges utilized

 

(64,823

)

(12,533

)

(6,446

)

(6,932

)

(90,734

)

Reversal of accrual

 

(2,508

)

 

 

 

(2,508

)

Balance at October 1, 2005

 

32,616

 

3,124

 

 

 

35,740

 

Charges to operations

 

95,563

 

1,306

 

12,956

 

24,165

 

133,990

 

Charges utilized

 

(96,738

)

(1,732

)

(13,206

)

(24,165

)

(135,841

)

Reversal of accrual

 

(4,790

)

 

(40

)

 

(4,830

)

Balance at September 30, 2006

 

26,651

 

2,698

 

(290

)

 

29,059

 

Charges to operations

 

2,871

 

 

3,292

 

87

 

6,250

 

Charges utilized

 

(17,427

)

(334

)

(3,002

)

(87

)

(20,850

)

Balance at December 30, 2006

 

$

12,095

 

$

2,364

 

$

 

$

 

$

14,459

 

 

During the three month period ended December 30, 2006, we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $6.3 million related to restructuring activities pursuant to SFAS No. 146 and SFAS No. 112. These charges included employee termination benefits of approximately $2.9 million, other restructuring costs of approximately $3.3 million, incurred primarily to prepare facilities for closure, and impairment of fixed assets of approximately $87,000 pursuant to SFAS No. 144, “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets”, mainly consisting of a building complex in one of our European facilities.  These facilities have been reclassified as assets held for sale and included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the quarter, we sold one of our European facilities previously classified as assets held for sale to a group of our former employees for a net gain of approximately $6.0 million which is recorded in other income (expense), net, on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. As part of this transaction, we entered into a supply agreement in regards to receiving manufacturing services from the buyer. The employee termination benefits were related to involuntary termination of employees, the majority of which were involved in manufacturing activities. Approximately $17.4 million of employee termination benefits were utilized and 2,739 employees were terminated during the three months ended December 30, 2006 pursuant to the restructuring plan. We also utilized $334,000 of lease and contract termination costs and $3.0 million of the other restructuring costs during the three month period ended December 30, 2006. We expect to pay the balance of the employee termination benefits in the near term and the accrued lease costs will be paid over the next four years.

In fiscal 2006, we recorded charges of approximately $129.1 million (net of $4.8 million reversal of accrual) related to restructuring activities pursuant to SFAS No. 146 and SFAS No. 112, all of which related to our restructuring plan. These charges included employee termination benefits of approximately $95.6 million, lease and contract termination costs of approximately $1.3 million, other restructuring costs of approximately $13.0 million, incurred primarily to prepare facilities for closure, and impairment of fixed assets of approximately $24.2 million consisting of excess facilities and equipment to be disposed of. The employee termination benefits were related to the involuntary termination of employees, the majority of which were involved in manufacturing activities. Approximately $97.0 million of employee termination benefits were utilized and a total of approximately 15,042 employees were terminated during fiscal 2006. We also utilized $1.7 million of lease and contract termination costs and $13.2 million of the other restructuring costs (other facilities charges) during fiscal 2006. We incurred charges to operations of $24.1 million during fiscal 2006 for the impairment of excess fixed assets at the vacated facilities, all of which were utilized as of September 30, 2006. We reversed approximately $4.8 million of accrued employee termination benefits. The reversal of accrual was primarily a result of the changes in estimates and economic circumstances.

In fiscal 2005, we recorded charges of approximately $109.3 million (net of $2.5 million reversal of accrual) related to restructuring activities pursuant to SFAS No. 146 and SFAS No. 112, of which $106.3 million related to our phase three restructuring plan and $3.0 million related to our phase two restructuring plan. These charges included employee termination benefits of approximately $84.5 million, lease and contract termination costs of approximately $14.1 million, other restructuring costs of approximately $6.4 million, incurred primarily to prepare facilities for closure, and impairment of fixed assets of approximately $6.9 million consisting of excess facilities and equipment to be disposed of. The employee termination benefits were related to the involuntary termination of employees, the majority of which were involved in manufacturing activities. Approximately $64.8 million of employee termination benefits were utilized and a total of

30




approximately 11,800 employees were terminated during fiscal 2005. We also utilized $12.5 million of lease and contract termination costs and $6.4 million of the other restructuring costs (other facilities charges) during fiscal 2005. We incurred charges to operations of $6.9 million during fiscal 2005 for the impairment of excess fixed assets at the vacated facilities, all of which were utilized as of October 1, 2005. We reversed approximately $2.5 million of accrued employee termination benefits. The reversal of accrual was a result of the changes in estimates and economic circumstances in one of our European entities.

Costs associated with restructuring activities initiated prior to January 1, 2003, other than those activities related to purchase business combinations, are accounted for in accordance with EITF 94-3 and SFAS 112 where applicable. Accordingly, costs associated with such plans are recorded as restructuring costs in the consolidated statements of operations generally at the commitment date. The accrued restructuring costs are included in “accrued liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheet. Below is a summary of the activity related to restructuring costs recorded pursuant to EITF 94-3 and SFAS No. 112 through the first quarter of fiscal year 2007:

 

Employee
Severance and
Related
Expenses

 

Leases and Facilities
Shutdown and
Consolidation
Costs

 

Write-off
Impaired or
Redundant
Fixed Assets

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

Cash

 

Cash

 

Non-Cash

 

Total

 

Balance at October 2, 2004

 

$

1,227

 

$

14,925

 

$

 

$

16,152

 

Charges to operations

 

2,285

 

2,522

 

4,107

 

8,914

 

Charges utilized

 

(3,010

)

(7,890

)

(4,107

)

(15,007

)

Balance at October 1, 2005

 

502

 

9,557

 

 

10,059

 

Charges to operations

 

1,549

 

2,577

 

(136

)

3,990

 

Charges utilized

 

(545

)

(4,424

)

136

 

(4,833

)

Reversal of accrual

 

(51

)

(420

)

 

(471

)

Balance at September 30, 2006

 

1,455

 

7,290

 

 

8,745

 

Charges to operations

 

 

191

 

237

 

428

 

Charges utilized

 

(23

)

(981

)

(237

)

(1,241

)

Reversal of accrual

 

(266

)

 

 

(266

)

Balance at December 30, 2006

 

$

1,166

 

$

6,500

 

$

 

$

7,666

 

 

The following sections separately present the charges to the restructuring liability and charges utilized that are set forth in the above table on an aggregate basis.  We expect to pay the balance of the employee termination benefits in the near term and the accrued lease costs will be paid over the next four years.

Fiscal 2002 Plans

September 2002 Restructuring.  During the three month period ended December 30, 2006, we recorded charges to operations of approximately $114,000 and utilized approximately $827,000 of accrued costs related to the shutdown of facilities.  Approximately $34,000 gain was incurred to operations due to disposal of fixed assets.  There were no employees terminated during the three month period ended December 30, 2006 pursuant to this restructuring plan.

In fiscal 2006, we recorded charges to operations of approximately $112,000 and utilized approximately $1.7 million related to the shutdown of facilities. In addition, $603,000 was charged to operations and utilized due to the impairment of fixed assets to be disposed of.

In fiscal 2005, we recorded charges to operations of approximately $203,000 and utilized $216,000 for employee severance expenses. There was no reduction of work force during fiscal 2005 pursuant to this restructuring plan. During fiscal 2005, we also recorded charges to operations of approximately $544,000 and utilized approximately $2.7 million for non-cancelable lease payments, lease termination costs and related costs for the shutdown of facilities. In addition, $800,000 was charged to operations and utilized due to the impairment of fixed assets to be disposed of. The closing of the plants discussed above as well as employee terminations and other related activities have been completed, however, the leases of the related facilities expire in 2009; therefore, the remaining accrual will be reduced over time as the lease payments, net of sublease income, are made.

October 2001 Restructuring.  During the three month period ended December 30, 2006, we incurred and utilized approximately $52,000 charges related to the shutdown of facilities.  Approximately $22,000 employee termination benefits were utilized.  We also reversed approximately $266,000 of accrued employee termination benefits due to the changes in estimates and economic circumstances.

31




In fiscal 2005, we recorded charges to operations of approximately $2.0 million for employee severance costs, of which $1.9 million was related to the settlement of pension plan at a Canadian site. We also recorded approximately $82,000 for non-cancelable lease payments and other costs related to the shutdown of facilities. We utilized accrued severance charges of approximately $2.7 million and accrued facilities shutdown related charges of $811,000 during fiscal 2005. In addition, we incurred and utilized charges of $633,000 in fiscal 2005 related to write-offs of fixed assets consisting of excess equipment and leasehold improvements to facilities that were permanently vacated. Manufacturing activities at the facilities affected by this plan ceased in fiscal year 2003 or prior; however, final payments of accrued costs may not occur until later periods.

Fiscal 2001 Plans

Segerström Restructuring.   In fiscal 2005, we completed the restructuring activities at a cost of $835,000 which was related to accrued facility charges.

July 2001 Restructuring.  During the three month period ended December 30, 2006, we recorded approximately $31,000 and utilized approximately $102,000 of accrued costs related to the shutdown of facilities.  We also recorded charges to operations and fully utilized $271,000 for write-off of impaired fixed assets.

In fiscal 2006, we recorded approximately $1.5 million of accrued severance for our Mexican facilities. In addition, we recorded approximately $2.3 million and utilized $2.6 million of accrued costs related to the shutdown of facilities. We also incurred and utilized $234,000 for the impairment of fixed assets to be disposed of. Manufacturing activities at the plants affected by this plan had ceased by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002; however, the leases of the related facilities expire between 2005 and 2010, therefore, the remaining accrual will be reduced over time as the lease payments, net of sublease income, are made.

In fiscal 2005, we recorded approximately $43,000 and utilized approximately $100,000 of accrued severance. In addition, we recorded approximately $1.9 million and utilized approximately $3.5 million of accrued costs related to the shutdown of facilities. We also incurred and utilized $2.7 million for the impairment of fixed assets to be disposed of. Manufacturing activities at the plants affected by this plan had ceased by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002; however, the leases of the related facilities expire between 2005 and 2010, therefore, the remaining accrual will be reduced over time as the lease payments, net of sublease income, are made.

The sublease income in relation to all restructured facilities is approximately $347,000.

Cost associated with restructuring activities related to purchase business combinations are accounted for in accordance with EITF 95-3.  Below is a summary of the activity related to restructuring costs recorded pursuant to EITF 95-3 through the first quarter of fiscal year 2007:

 

Employee
Severance and
Related
Expenses

 

Facilities
Shutdown and
Consolidation
Costs

 

Write-off
Impaired or
Redundant
Fixed Assets

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

Cash

 

Cash

 

Non-Cash

 

Total

 

Balance at October 2, 2004

 

$

2,084

 

$

2,178

 

$

 

$

4,262

 

Accrued utilized

 

(773

)

(393

)

 

(1,166

)

Balance at October 1, 2005

 

1,311

 

1,785

 

 

3,096

 

Charges to operations

 

114

 

125

 

 

239

 

Charges utilized

 

(40

)

(1,804

)

 

(1,844

)

Reversal of accrual

 

(687

)

 

 

(687

)

Balance at September 30, 2006

 

698

 

106

 

 

804

 

Charges to operations

 

 

 

(3,198

)

(3,198

)

Charges utilized

 

 

 

3,198

 

3,198

 

Balance at December 30, 2006

 

$

698

 

$

106

 

$

 

$

804

 

 

During the quarter, we sold one of our North American facilities previously classified as assets held for sale for a net gain of approximately $3.2 million.

32




The following sections separately present the charges to the restructuring liability and charges utilized that are set forth in the above table on an aggregate basis.

SCI Acquisition Restructuring.  .  During the three month period ended December 30, 2006, we recognized approximately $3.2 million recovery from the sale of one of our domestic facilities previously classified as assets held for sale.

In fiscal 2006, we utilized a total of $1.8 million of facilities-related accruals and reversed $687,000 of accrued severance due to a change in estimate.

In fiscal 2005, we utilized $731,000 related to employee severance and utilized $393,000 due to facilities shutdown.

Ongoing Restructuring Activities. We continue to rationalize manufacturing facilities and headcount to more efficiently scale capacity to current market and operating conditions. These future restructuring costs are not currently estimable.

Segments.  The following table summarizes the total restructuring costs incurred with respect to our reported segments through the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 (in thousands):

 

December 30,
 2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

Personal Computing

 

$

(1,997

)

$

20,701

 

Standard Electronic Manufacturing Services

 

5,212

 

14,927

 

Total

 

$

3,215

 

$

35,628

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

6,089

 

$

20,042

 

Non-cash

 

(2,874

)

15,586

 

Total

 

$

3,215

 

$

35,628

 

 

The cumulative restructuring costs per segment have not been disclosed as it is impractical to do so. The recognition of restructuring charges requires our management to make judgments and estimates regarding the nature, timing, and amount of costs associated with the planned exit activity, including estimating sublease income and the fair value, less selling costs, of property, plant and equipment to be disposed of. Management’s estimates of future liabilities may change, requiring us to record additional restructuring charges or reduce the amount of liabilities already recorded.

On November 16, 2006, we announced two strategic decisions: to realign our ODM activities to focus on joint development manufacturing and to create a more separable personal and business computing business unit. We also announced that we may further consolidate operations in higher-cost geographies to further enhance profitability. We expect to record additional charges that are currently not estimable related to these anticipated actions in fiscal year 2007.

We plan to fund cash restructuring costs with cash flows generated by operating activities.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $10.3 million to $43.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 from $33.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase in interest expense is primarily attributable to the interest expense related to the $600 million unsecured term loan we entered into and simultaneously drew down on October 13, 2006, higher interest rate from our interest rate swap on our 6.75% Notes, interest expense from increased borrowing against our revolving credit facility during the first quarter of fiscal 2007, offset by a decrease in interest expense from the refinancing of the 10.375% Notes with the 8.125% Notes during the second quarter of fiscal 2006.

33




Other Income (Expense), net

Other income, net was $11.0 million for the three month period ended December 30, 2006 and expense of $5.7 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2005.  The following table summarizes the major components of other income (expense), net:

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30,
2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

 

 

(In Thousands)

 

Foreign exchange gains (losses)

 

$

2,852

 

$

(389

)

Interest rate swap

 

 

(5,465

)

Other, net

 

8,109

 

147

 

Total other income (expense), net

 

$

10,961

 

$

(5,707

)

 

For the three months ended December 30, 2006, other, net, primarily consists of a $6.0 million gain from the sale of manufacturing facility previously classified as assets held for sale and a $1.8 million gain related to the collection of previously fully reserved notes receivable. Additionally, for the three months ended December 30, 2006, foreign exchange gains included a $1.4 million gain related to the realization of currency translation adjustments related to the substantial liquidation of one of our foreign subsidiaries.

Provision for Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was approximately 23.8% and 1,030.0%, respectively. The effective rate for the three months ended December 30, 2006 differs from the same period in fiscal year 2006 due primarily to the recognition of a $27.9 million tax benefit resulting from a favorable settlement with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in relation to certain U.S. tax audits.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 30,
2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

 

 

 

 

(Restated)

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Net cash provided by (used in):

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

(10,226

)

$

(66,247

)