FORM 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

United States

Securities And Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x Quarterly Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For The Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010

or

 

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

 

Commission

File Number

  

Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter

and principal office address and telephone number

  

State of
Incorporation

  

I.R.S. Employer
ID. Number

1-14514    Consolidated Edison, Inc.    New York    13-3965100
   4 Irving Place, New York, New York 10003      
   (212) 460-4600      
1-1217    Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.    New York    13-5009340
   4 Irving Place, New York, New York 10003      
   (212) 460-4600      

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison)      Yes x      No ¨
Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc. (CECONY)      Yes x      No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 

Con Edison      Yes x      No ¨
CECONY      Yes x      No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Con Edison      
Large accelerated filer x   Accelerated filer ¨   Non-accelerated filer ¨   Smaller reporting company ¨
CECONY      
Large accelerated filer ¨   Accelerated filer ¨   Non-accelerated filer x   Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

Con Edison      Yes ¨      No x
CECONY      Yes ¨      No x

As of April 30, 2010, Con Edison had outstanding 281,970,958 Common Shares ($.10 par value). All of the outstanding common equity of CECONY is held by Con Edison.

Filing Format

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is a combined report being filed separately by two different registrants: Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY). CECONY is a subsidiary of Con Edison and, as such, the information in this report about CECONY also applies to Con Edison. As used in this report, the term the “Companies” refers to Con Edison and CECONY. However, CECONY makes no representation as to the information contained in this report relating to Con Edison or the subsidiaries of Con Edison other than itself.


Table of Contents

Glossary of Terms

The following is a glossary of frequently used abbreviations or acronyms that are used in the Companies’ SEC reports:

 

Con Edison Companies
Con Edison    Consolidated Edison, Inc.
Con Edison Development    Consolidated Edison Development, Inc.
Con Edison Energy    Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc.
CECONY    Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Con Edison Solutions    Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc.
O&R    Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
Pike    Pike County Light & Power Company
RECO    Rockland Electric Company
Companies    Con Edison and CECONY
Utilities    CECONY and O&R
Regulatory Agencies, Government Agencies, and Quasi-governmental Not-for-Profits
EPA    U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
FERC    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
IRS    Internal Revenue Service
ISO-NE    ISO New England Inc.
NJBPU    New Jersey Board of Public Utilities
NJDEP    New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
NYAG    New York State Attorney General
NYSDEC    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
NYISO    New York Independent System Operator
NYPA    New York Power Authority
NYSPSC    New York State Public Service Commission
NYSERDA    New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
NYSRC    New York State Reliability Council, LLC
PJM    PJM Interconnection LLC
PAPUC    Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
SEC    U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Accounting
ABO    Accumulated Benefit Obligation
FASB    Financial Accounting Standards Board
LILO    Lease In/Lease Out
OCI    Other Comprehensive Income
SFAS    Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
SSCM    Simplified service cost method
VIE    Variable interest entity
Environmental
CO2    Carbon dioxide
GHG    Greenhouse gases
MGP Sites    Manufactured gas plant sites
PCBs    Polychlorinated biphenyls
PRP    Potentially responsible party
SO2    Sulfur dioxide
Superfund    Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 and similar state statutes
2     


Table of Contents
Units of Measure
dths    Dekatherms
kV    Kilovolts
kWh    Kilowatt-hour
mdths    Thousand dekatherms
MMlbs    Million pounds
MVA    Megavolt amperes
MW    Megawatts or thousand kilowatts
MWH    Megawatt hour
Other
AFDC    Allowance for funds used during construction
COSO    Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
EMF    Electric and magnetic fields
ERRP    East River Repowering Project
Fitch    Fitch Ratings
First Quarter Form 10-Q    The Companies’ combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
Form 10-K    The Companies’ combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
LTIP    Long Term Incentive Plan
Moody’s    Moody’s Investors Service
S&P    Standard & Poor’s Rating Services
VaR    Value-at-Risk
    3


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

          PAGE
PART I—Financial Information  
ITEM 1  

Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 
 

Con Edison

 
 

Consolidated Income Statement

  6
 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

  7
 

Consolidated Balance Sheet

  8
 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

  10
 

Consolidated Statement of Common Shareholders’ Equity

  11
 

CECONY

 
 

Consolidated Income Statement

  12
 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

  13
 

Consolidated Balance Sheet

  14
 

Consolidated Statement of Common Shareholder’s Equity

  16
 

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

  17
ITEM 2  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  34
ITEM 3  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  50
ITEM 4  

Controls and Procedures

  50
ITEM 4T  

Controls and Procedures

  50
PART II—Other Information  
ITEM 1  

Legal Proceedings

  51
ITEM 1A  

Risk Factors

  51
ITEM 6  

Exhibits

  52
  Signatures   53
4     


Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

This report includes forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe-harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectation and not facts. Words such as “expects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes,” “plans,” “will” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on information available at the time the statements are made, and accordingly speak only as of that time. Actual results or developments might differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements because of various factors such as those discussed under "Risk Factors" in Item 1A of the Form 10-K.

    5


Table of Contents

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Consolidated Income Statement (Unaudited)

  
    

For the Three Months

Ended March 31,

 
     2010     2009  
    (Millions of Dollars/Except Share Data)  

OPERATING REVENUES

   

Electric

  $ 1,889      $ 1,803   

Gas

    773        888   

Steam

    307        331   

Non-utility

    493        401   

TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

    3,462        3,423   

OPERATING EXPENSES

   

Purchased power

    1,143        1,139   

Fuel

    150        235   

Gas purchased for resale

    343        498   

Other operations and maintenance

    702        581   

Depreciation and amortization

    204        192   

Taxes, other than income taxes

    428        359   

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES

    2,970        3,004   

OPERATING INCOME

    492        419   

OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)

   

Investment and other income

    6        3   

Allowance for equity funds used during construction

    5        3   

Other deductions

    (3     (4

TOTAL OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)

    8        2   

INCOME BEFORE INTEREST AND INCOME TAX EXPENSE

    500        421   

INTEREST EXPENSE

   

Interest on long-term debt

    150        142   

Other interest

    2        4   

Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction

    (3     (2

NET INTEREST EXPENSE

    149        144   

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE

    351        277   

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

    122        94   

NET INCOME

    229        183   

Preferred stock dividend requirements of subsidiary

    (3     (3

NET INCOME FOR COMMON STOCK

  $ 226      $ 180   

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE – BASIC

   

Net income for common stock

  $ 0.80      $ 0.66   

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE – DILUTED

   

Net income for common stock

  $ 0.80      $ 0.66   

DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

  $ 0.595      $ 0.59   

AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING – BASIC (IN MILLIONS)

    281.4        273.9   

AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING – DILUTED (IN MILLIONS)

    282.7        274.5   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6     


Table of Contents

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

  
    

For the Three Months

Ended March 31,

 
     2010     2009  
    (Millions of Dollars)  

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

   

Net Income

  $ 229      $ 183   

PRINCIPAL NON-CASH CHARGES/(CREDITS) TO INCOME

   

Depreciation and amortization

    204        192   

Deferred income taxes

    37        150   

Rate case amortization and accruals

    (6     10   

Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction

    (5     (3

Net derivative (gains)/losses

    64        57   

Other non-cash items (net)

    110        32   

CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

   

Accounts receivable – customers, less allowance for uncollectibles

    (139     (15

Materials and supplies, including fuel oil and gas in storage

    52        182   

Other receivables and other current assets

    8        (42

Prepayments

    (289     215   

Recoverable energy costs

           97   

Refundable energy costs

    (69       

Accounts payable

    (100     (250

Pensions and retiree benefits

    58        (17

Accrued taxes

    70        (19

Accrued interest

    44        43   

Deferred charges, deferred derivative losses, noncurrent assets and other regulatory assets

    (502     (222

Deferred credits and other regulatory liabilities

    178        64   

Other assets

    (3     (1

Other liabilities

    60        (11

NET CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    1        645   

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

   

Utility construction expenditures

    (430     (482

Cost of removal less salvage

    (34     (46

Non-utility construction expenditures

    (1     (1

Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction

    5        3   

NET CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    (460     (526

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

   

Net (payments of)/proceeds from short-term debt

    475        (141

Retirement of long-term debt

    (45     (1

Issuance of long-term debt

           750   

Issuance of common stock

    14        8   

Debt issuance costs

           (5

Common stock dividends

    (155     (150

Preferred stock dividends

    (3     (3

NET CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    286        458   

CASH AND TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS:

   

NET CHANGE FOR THE PERIOD

    (173     577   

BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

    260        74   

BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD

  $ 87      $ 651   

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

   

Cash paid during the period for:

   

Interest

  $ 103      $ 94   

Income taxes

         $ 4   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    7


Table of Contents

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited)

  
     March 31,
2010
  December 31,
2009
    (Millions of Dollars)

ASSETS

   

CURRENT ASSETS

   

Cash and temporary cash investments

  $ 87   $ 260

Accounts receivable – customers, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $69 and $70 in 2010 and 2009, respectively

    1,186     1,047

Accrued unbilled revenue

    422     579

Other receivables, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $6 and $5 in 2010 and 2009, respectively

    388     379

Fuel oil, at average cost

    61     39

Gas in storage, at average cost

    83     164

Materials and supplies, at average cost

    159     152

Prepayments

    420     131

Fair value of derivative assets

    122     104

Recoverable energy costs

    42     60

Deferred derivative losses

    302     141

Revenue decoupling mechanism receivable

    52     117

Other current assets

    62     70

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS

    3,386     3,243

INVESTMENTS

    381     385

UTILITY PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST

   

Electric

    18,904     18,645

Gas

    4,037     3,983

Steam

    1,940     1,935

General

    1,872     1,866

TOTAL

    26,753     26,429

Less: Accumulated depreciation

    5,507     5,412

Net

    21,246     21,017

Construction work in progress

    1,467     1,422

NET UTILITY PLANT

    22,713     22,439

NON-UTILITY PLANT

   

Non-utility property, less accumulated depreciation of $47 and $45 in 2010 and 2009, respectively

    24     19

Construction work in progress

    2     6

NET PLANT

    22,739     22,464

OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS

   

Goodwill

    420     416

Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $3 and $2 in 2010 and 2009, respectively

    3     4

Regulatory assets

    7,200     7,103

Other deferred charges and noncurrent assets

    320     258

TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS

    7,943     7,781

TOTAL ASSETS

  $ 34,449   $ 33,873

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

8     


Table of Contents

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited)

  
     March 31,
2010
  December 31,
2009
    (Millions of Dollars)

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

CURRENT LIABILITIES

   

Long-term debt due within one year

  $ 686   $ 731

Notes payable

    475    

Accounts payable

    978     1,078

Customer deposits

    276     274

Accrued taxes

    121     51

Accrued interest

    200     156

Accrued wages

    90     91

Fair value of derivative liabilities

    212     114

Deferred derivative gains

    2     8

Deferred income taxes

    17     24

Uncertain income taxes

    96     97

Other current liabilities

    365     328

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES

    3,518     2,952

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

   

Obligations under capital leases

    11     14

Provision for injuries and damages

    169     168

Pensions and retiree benefits

    3,168     3,363

Superfund and other environmental costs

    246     212

Asset retirement obligations

    123     122

Fair value of derivative liabilities

    179     131

Other noncurrent liabilities

    97     108

TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

    3,993     4,118

DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES

   

Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits

    5,727     5,597

Regulatory liabilities

    777     858

Other deferred credits

    27     32

TOTAL DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES

    6,531     6,487

LONG-TERM DEBT

    9,855     9,854

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

Common shareholders’ equity (See Statement of Shareholders’ Equity)

    10,339     10,249

Preferred stock of subsidiary

    213     213

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    10,552     10,462

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $ 34,449   $ 33,873

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    9


Table of Contents

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

  
    

For the Three Months

Ended March 31,

 
     2010     2009  
    (Millions of Dollars)  

NET INCOME

  $ 229      $ 183   

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS), NET OF TAXES

   

Pension plan liability adjustments, net of $2 taxes in 2010 and $1 taxes in 2009

    3        2   

Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of $1 in 2009

           1   

TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS), NET OF TAXES

    3        1   

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

  $ 232      $ 184   

Preferred stock dividend requirements of subsidiary

    (3     (3

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR COMMON STOCK

  $ 229      $ 181   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

10     


Table of Contents

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Common Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

  
    Common Stock   Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 

Retained

Earnings

    Treasury Stock    

Capital
Stock

Expense

   

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive

Income/(Loss)

    Total  
(Millions of Dollars/Except Share Data)   Shares   Amount       Shares   Amount        

BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008

  273,721,686   $ 29   $ 4,112   $ 6,685      23,210,700   $ (1,001   $ (60   $ (67   $ 9,698   

Net income for common stock

          180                180   

Common stock dividends

          (162             (162

Issuance of common shares – dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans

  532,533       20               20   

Other comprehensive income

                                                1        1   

BALANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2009

  274,254,219   $ 29   $ 4,132   $ 6,703      23,210,700   $ (1,001   $ (60   $ (66   $ 9,737   

BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009

  281,123,741   $ 30   $ 4,420   $ 6,904      23,210,700   $ (1,001   $ (62   $ (42   $ 10,249   

Net income for common stock

          226                226   

Common stock dividends

          (167             (167

Issuance of common shares – dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans

  647,731       28               28   

Other comprehensive income

                                                3        3   

BALANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2010

  281,771,472   $ 30   $ 4,448   $ 6,963      23,210,700   $ (1,001   $ (62   $ (39   $ 10,339   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    11


Table of Contents

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Consolidated Income Statement (Unaudited)

  
    

For the Three Months

Ended March 31,

 
     2010     2009  
    (Millions of Dollars)  

OPERATING REVENUES

   

Electric

  $ 1,728      $ 1,658   

Gas

    683        781   

Steam

    307        331   

TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

    2,718        2,770   

OPERATING EXPENSES

   

Purchased power

    552        648   

Fuel

    150        235   

Gas purchased for resale

    294        428   

Other operations and maintenance

    608        501   

Depreciation and amortization

    191        181   

Taxes, other than income taxes

    411        344   

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES

    2,206        2,337   

OPERATING INCOME

    512        433   

OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)

   

Investment and other income

    3        2   

Allowance for equity funds used during construction

    4        2   

Other deductions

    (2     (3

TOTAL OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)

    5        1   

INCOME BEFORE INTEREST AND INCOME TAX EXPENSE

    517        434   

INTEREST EXPENSE

   

Interest on long-term debt

    135        128   

Other interest

    3        2   

Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction

    (2     (2

NET INTEREST EXPENSE

    136        128   

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE

    381        306   

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

    135        106   

NET INCOME

    246        200   

Preferred stock dividend requirements

    (3     (3

NET INCOME FOR COMMON STOCK

  $ 243      $ 197   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12     


Table of Contents

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

  
    

For the Three Months

Ended March 31,

 
     2010     2009  
    (Millions of Dollars)  

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

   

Net income

  $ 246      $ 200   

PRINCIPAL NON-CASH CHARGES/(CREDITS) TO INCOME

   

Depreciation and amortization

    191        181   

Deferred income taxes

    64        167   

Rate case amortization and accruals

    (6     10   

Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction

    (4     (2

Other non-cash items (net)

    35        (44

CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

   

Accounts receivable – customers, less allowance for uncollectibles

    (110     (5

Materials and supplies, including fuel oil and gas in storage

    38        143   

Other receivables and other current assets

    99        (69

Prepayments

    (284     216   

Recoverable energy costs

           108   

Refundable energy costs

    (77       

Accounts payable

    (77     (223

Pensions and retiree benefits

    39        (27

Accrued taxes

    (4     56   

Accrued interest

    35        30   

Deferred charges, deferred derivative losses, noncurrent assets and other regulatory assets

    (346     (131

Deferred credits and other regulatory liabilities

    134        30   

Other liabilities

    49        (4

NET CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    22        636   

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

   

Utility construction expenditures

    (412     (467

Cost of removal less salvage

    (33     (45

Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction

    4        2   

Loan to affiliate

           113   

NET CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    (441     (397

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

   

Net (payments of)/proceeds from short-term debt

    475        (253

Issuance of long-term debt

           750   

Debt issuance costs

           (5

Capital contribution by parent

    12          

Dividend to parent

    (167     (163

Preferred stock dividends

    (3     (3

NET CASH FLOWS (USED IN)/FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    317        326   

CASH AND TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS:

   

NET CHANGE FOR THE PERIOD

    (102     565   

BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

    131        37   

BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD

  $ 29      $ 602   

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

   

Cash paid/(refunded) during the period for:

   

Interest

  $ 96      $ 93   

Income taxes

         $ 12   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    13


Table of Contents

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited)

  
     

March 31,

2010

   December 31,
2009
     (Millions of Dollars)

ASSETS

     

CURRENT ASSETS

     

Cash and temporary cash investments

   $ 29    $ 131

Accounts receivable – customers, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $63 in 2010 and 2009

     1,013      904

Other receivables, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $4 in 2010 and 2009

     148      134

Accrued unbilled revenue

     285      413

Accounts receivable from affiliated companies

     75      124

Fuel oil, at average cost

     61      39

Gas in storage, at average cost

     69      131

Materials and supplies, at average cost

     142      140

Prepayments

     366      82

Fair value of derivative assets

     37      39

Deferred derivative losses

     242      104

Revenue decoupling mechanism receivable

     44      107

Other current assets

     50      50

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS

     2,561      2,398

INVESTMENTS

     124      126

UTILITY PLANT AT ORIGINAL COST

     

Electric

     17,817      17,570

Gas

     3,581      3,537

Steam

     1,940      1,935

General

     1,712      1,708

TOTAL

     25,050      24,750

Less: Accumulated depreciation

     5,035      4,947

Net

     20,015      19,803

Construction work in progress

     1,386      1,334

NET UTILITY PLANT

     21,401      21,137

NON-UTILITY PROPERTY

     

Non-utility property, less accumulated depreciation of $21 and $20 in 2010 and 2009, respectively

     10      9

NET PLANT

     21,411      21,146

OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS

     

Regulatory assets

     6,650      6,590

Other deferred charges and noncurrent assets

     231      201

TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS

     6,881      6,791

TOTAL ASSETS

   $ 30,977    $ 30,461

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14     


Table of Contents

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited)

  
     March 31,
2010
  December 31,
2009
    (Millions of Dollars)

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY

   

CURRENT LIABILITIES

   

Long-term debt due within one year

  $ 625   $ 625

Notes payable

    475    

Accounts payable

    770     843

Accounts payable to affiliated companies

    13     17

Customer deposits

    262     259

Accrued taxes

    25     41

Accrued taxes to affiliated companies

    21     9

Accrued interest

    172     137

Accrued wages

    84     89

Fair value of derivative liabilities

    120     45

Deferred derivative gains

    2     8

Uncertain income taxes

    90     92

Other current liabilities

    335     282

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES

    2,994     2,447

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

   

Obligations under capital leases

    11     14

Provision for injuries and damages

    161     160

Pensions and retiree benefits

    2,792     2,978

Superfund and other environmental costs

    163     159

Asset retirement obligations

    123     122

Fair value of derivative liabilities

    47     44

Other noncurrent liabilities

    64     68

TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

    3,361     3,545

DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES

   

Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits

    5,285     5,139

Regulatory liabilities

    627     703

Other deferred credits

    24     29

TOTAL DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES

    5,936     5,871

LONG-TERM DEBT

    9,038     9,038

SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY

   

Common shareholder’s equity (See Statement of Shareholder’s Equity)

    9,435     9,347

Preferred stock

    213     213

TOTAL SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY

    9,648     9,560

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY

  $ 30,977   $ 30,461

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    15


Table of Contents

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Common Shareholder’s Equity (Unaudited)

  
     Common Stock    Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  

Retained

Earnings

   

Repurchased
Con Edison

Stock

   

Capital
Stock

Expense

   

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive

Income/(Loss)

    Total  
(Millions of Dollars/Except Share Data)    Shares    Amount              

BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008

   235,488,094    $ 589    $ 3,664    $ 5,780      $ (962   $ (60   $ (20   $ 8,991   

Net income

              200              200   

Common stock dividend to parent

              (163           (163

Cumulative preferred dividends

                        (3                             (3

BALANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2009

   235,488,094    $ 589    $ 3,664    $ 5,814      $ (962   $ (60   $ (20   $ 9,025   

BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009

   235,488,094    $ 589    $ 3,877    $ 5,909      $ (962   $ (62   $ (4   $ 9,347   

Net income

              246              246   

Capital contribution from parent

           12              12   

Common stock dividend to parent

              (167           (167

Cumulative preferred dividends

                        (3                             (3

BALANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2009

   235,488,094    $ 589    $ 3,889    $ 5,985      $ (962   $ (62   $ (4   $ 9,435   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16     


Table of Contents

Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)

General

These combined notes accompany and form an integral part of the separate consolidated financial statements of each of the two separate registrants: Consolidated Edison, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Con Edison) and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and its subsidiaries (CECONY). CECONY is a subsidiary of Con Edison and as such its financial condition and results of operations and cash flows, which are presented separately in the CECONY consolidated financial statements, are also consolidated, along with those of Con Edison’s other utility subsidiary, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (O&R), and Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses (discussed below) in Con Edison’s consolidated financial statements. The term “Utilities” is used in these notes to refer to CECONY and O&R.

As used in these notes, the term “Companies” refers to Con Edison and CECONY and, except as otherwise noted, the information in these combined notes relates to each of the Companies. However, CECONY makes no representation as to information relating to Con Edison or the subsidiaries of Con Edison other than itself.

The separate interim consolidated financial statements of each of the Companies are unaudited but, in the opinion of their respective managements, reflect all adjustments (which include only normally recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The Companies’ separate interim consolidated financial statements should be read together with their separate audited financial statements (including the combined notes thereto) included in Item 8 of their combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K). Information in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K referred to in these notes is incorporated by reference herein. The use of terms such as “see” or “refer to” shall be deemed to incorporate by reference into these notes the information to which reference is made.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. Consistent with current industry practice, the Companies are presenting income tax expense as one item on their consolidated income statements (instead of separate items in the operating income and other income sections of the consolidated income statements).

Con Edison has two regulated utility subsidiaries: CECONY and O&R. CECONY provides electric service and gas service in New York City and Westchester County. The company also provides steam service in parts of Manhattan. O&R, along with its regulated utility subsidiaries, provides electric service in southeastern New York and adjacent areas of northern New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania and gas service in southeastern New York and adjacent areas of eastern Pennsylvania. Con Edison has the following competitive energy businesses: Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc. (Con Edison Solutions), a retail energy services company that sells electricity and also offers energy-related services; Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc. (Con Edison Energy), a wholesale energy supply and services company; and Consolidated Edison Development, Inc. (Con Edison Development), a company that develops and participates in infrastructure projects.

Note A — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenues

Reference is made to “Revenues” in Note A to the financial statements included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. The Utilities and Con Edison Solutions recognize revenues for energy service on a monthly billing cycle basis. The Utilities defer over a 12-month period net interruptible gas revenues, other than those authorized by the New York State Public Service Commission (NYSPSC) to be retained by the Utilities, for refund to firm gas sales and transportation customers. The Utilities and Con Edison Solutions accrue revenues at the end of each month for estimated energy service not yet billed to customers. Prior to March 31, 2009, CECONY did not accrue revenues for energy service provided but not yet billed to customers except for certain unbilled gas revenues accrued in 1989. This change in accounting for unbilled revenues had no effect on net income. See “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities” in Note B to the

    17


Table of Contents

financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. Unbilled revenues included in Con Edison’s balance sheet at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $422 million (including $285 million for CECONY) and $579 million (including $413 million for CECONY), respectively.

 

Earnings Per Common Share

Reference is made to “Earnings Per Common Share” in Note A to the financial statements included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, Con Edison’s basic and diluted EPS are calculated as follows:

 

(Millions of Dollars, except per share amounts/Shares in Millions)   2010   2009

Net income for common stock

  $ 226   $ 180

Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic

    281.4     273.9

Add: Incremental shares attributable to effect of potentially dilutive securities

    1.3     0.6

Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted

    282.7     274.5

Earnings per Common Share – Basic

   

Net income for common stock

  $ 0.80   $ 0.66

Earnings per Common Share – Diluted

   

Net income for common stock

  $ 0.80   $ 0.66

 

Note B—Regulatory Matters

Reference is made to “Accounting Policies” in Note A and “Rate Agreements” in Note B to the financial statements included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Rate Agreements

CECONY — Electric

In March 2010, the NYSPSC issued an order approving the November 2009 Joint Proposal covering the rates CECONY can charge its customers for electric delivery service during the three-year period April 2010 through March 2013. Among other things, this Joint Proposal provides for electric base rate increases of $420 million, effective April 2010 and 2011, and $287 million, effective April 2012, with an additional $133 million to be collected through a surcharge in the rate year ending March 2013. Also, on March 26, 2010, the NYSPSC issued an order approving the February 2010 Joint Proposal relating to the NYSPSC’s review of CECONY’s capital expenditures during the April 2005 through March 2008 period covered by CECONY’s 2005 electric rate agreement. The NYSPSC modified this Joint Proposal to provide a $36 million credit to customer bills in 2010 instead of providing this amount to customers over the next three years. For additional information about the November 2009 and February 2010 Joint Proposals, see Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

 

O&R — Electric

In May 2010, Rockland Electric Company (a regulated utility subsidiary of O&R), the Division of Rate Counsel, Staff of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) and certain other parties entered into a stipulation of settlement with respect to the company’s August 2009 request to increase the rates that it can charge its customers for electric delivery service. The stipulation, which is subject to approval by the Board of the NJBPU, provides for an electric rate increase, effective May 17, 2010, of $9.8 million. The stipulation reflects a return on common equity of 10.3 percent and a common equity ratio of approximately 50 percent. The stipulation continues current provisions with respect to recovery from customers of the cost of purchased power and does not provide for reconciliation of actual expenses to amounts reflected in electric rates for pension and other postretirement benefit costs.

CECONY — Gas and Steam

In April 2010, CECONY, the NYSPSC staff and certain other parties reached agreements in principle with respect to CECONY’s November 2009 requests to the NYSPSC for increases in the rates the company can charge its customers for gas delivery service and steam service. The terms of the agreements in principle, pursuant to applicable requirements, remain confidential until Joint Proposals regarding the requests

18     


Table of Contents

are entered into by CECONY, the NYSPSC staff and other parties, if any, and filed with the NYSPSC for approval (which filings are expected to occur in May 2010).

Other Regulatory Matters

In February 2009, the NYSPSC commenced a proceeding to examine the prudence of certain CECONY expenditures (see “Investigation of Contractor Payments” in Note H). Pursuant to NYSPSC orders, a portion of the company’s revenues (effective April 2010, $249 million, $32 million and $6 million on an annual basis for electric, gas and steam service, respectively) is being collected subject to potential refund to customers. At March 31, 2010, the company had collected an estimated $322 million from customers subject to potential refund in connection with this proceeding. The company is unable to estimate the amount, if any, of any such refund and, accordingly, has not established a regulatory liability for a refund.

 

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities

Regulatory assets and liabilities at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were comprised of the following items:

 

     Con Edison     CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)   2010   2009     2010   2009

Regulatory assets

         

Unrecognized pension and other postretirement costs

  $ 4,289   $ 4,472       $ 4,093   $ 4,259

Future federal income tax

    1,368     1,316        1,298     1,249

Environmental remediation costs

    421     388        334     329

Surcharge for New York State Assessment

    202     138        187     126

Deferred derivative losses – long-term

    180     106        131     75

Revenue taxes

    124     119        121     116

Pension and other postretirement benefits deferrals

    121     101        70     49

Property tax reconciliation

    94     85        94     85

Net electric deferrals

    82     82        82     82

O&R transition bond charges

    52     55           

World Trade Center restoration costs

    39     41        39     41

Workers’ compensation

    36     37        36     37

Storm reserves

    44     5        31    

Other retirement program costs

    11     12        11     12

Asbestos-related costs

    10     10        9     9

Gas rate plan deferral

    9     21        9     21

Other

    118     115        105     100

Regulatory assets

    7,200     7,103        6,650     6,590

Deferred derivative losses – current

    302     141        242     104

Recoverable energy costs – current

    42     60           

Total Regulatory Assets

  $ 7,544   $ 7,304      $ 6,892   $ 6,694

Regulatory liabilities

         

Allowance for cost of removal less salvage

  $ 381   $ 371      $ 312   $ 303

Refundable energy costs

    95     147        35     77

2005-2008 capital expenditure reserve

    26     24        26     24

Net unbilled revenue deferrals

    23     91        23     91

Gain on sale of First Avenue properties

    23     23        23     23

Rate case amortizations

    14     21        14     21

Electric rate case deferral

        19            19

Other

    215     162        194     145

Regulatory liabilities

    777     858        627     703

Deferred derivative gains – current

    2     8        2     8

Total Regulatory Liabilities

  $ 779   $ 866      $ 629   $ 711
    19


Table of Contents

Note C — Long-Term Debt

Reference is made to Note C to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Note D — Short-Term Borrowing

Reference is made to Note D to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

At March 31, 2010, Con Edison had $475 million of commercial paper outstanding, all of which was outstanding under CECONY’s program. The weighted average interest rate was 0.3 percent. At December 31, 2009, Con Edison and CECONY had no commercial paper outstanding. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, no loans were outstanding under the Companies’ Credit Agreement and $235 million (including $174 million for CECONY) and $193 million (including $135 million for CECONY) of letters of credit were outstanding under the Credit Agreement, respectively.

Note E — Pension Benefits

Reference is made to Note E to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

 

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The components of the Companies’ net periodic benefit costs for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

 

     Con Edison     CECONY  
(Millions of Dollars)   2010     2009     2010     2009  

Service cost – including administrative expenses

  $ 42      $ 40      $ 39      $ 37   

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

    139        131        130        123   

Expected return on plan assets

    (176     (173     (167     (165

Amortization of net actuarial loss

    106        75        100        68   

Amortization of prior service costs

    2        2        2        2   

NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST

  $ 113      $ 75      $ 104      $ 65   

Amortization of regulatory asset*

           1               1   

TOTAL PERIODIC BENEFIT COST

  $ 113      $ 76      $ 104      $ 66   

Cost capitalized

    (41     (27     (39     (25

Cost deferred

    (23     (31     (21     (28

Cost charged to operating expenses

  $ 49      $ 18      $ 44      $ 13   

 

* Relates to increases in CECONY’s pension obligations of $45 million from a 1999 special retirement program.

 

Expected Contributions

Based on estimates as of December 31, 2009, the Companies are not required under funding regulations and laws to make any contributions to the pension plan during 2010. The Companies’ policy is to fund their accounting cost to the extent tax deductible, therefore, Con Edison expects to make discretionary contributions in 2010 of $434 million, including $397 million for CECONY (of which CECONY contributed $112 million in the first quarter of 2010). During the first quarter of 2009, CECONY contributed $92 million to the pension plan. The Companies expect to fund $25 million for the non-qualified supplemental pension plans in 2010. The Companies are continuing to monitor changes to funding and tax laws that may impact future pension plan funding requirements.

Note F — Other Postretirement Benefits

Reference is made to Note F to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

20     


Table of Contents

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The components of the Companies’ net periodic postretirement benefit costs for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

 

     Con Edison     CECONY  
(Millions of Dollars)   2010     2009     2010     2009  

Service cost

  $ 6      $ 5      $ 5      $ 4   

Interest cost on accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation

    23        24        20        21   

Expected return on plan assets

    (22     (21     (19     (20

Amortization of net actuarial loss

    23        18        21        16   

Amortization of prior service cost

    (3     (3     (4     (3

Amortization of transition obligation

    1        1        1        1   

NET PERIODIC POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT COST

  $ 28      $ 24      $ 24      $ 19   

Cost capitalized

    (10     (9     (9     (7

Cost deferred

    (1     (1     (2     (2

Cost charged to operating expenses

  $ 17      $ 14      $ 13      $ 10   

 

Health Care Reform

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 became law. The Companies are assessing the impact of these laws. In March 2010, CECONY reduced its deferred tax asset to reflect the laws’ repeal, effective 2013, of the deduction for federal income tax purposes of the portion of the cost of an employer’s retiree prescription drug coverage for which the employer received a benefit under the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (see Note F to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K). For CECONY, the reductions in its deferred tax asset ($33 million) had no effect on net income because a regulatory asset in a like amount on a pre-tax basis was established to reflect future recovery from customers of the increased cost of its retiree prescription drug coverage resulting from the loss of the tax deduction. The impacts on Con Edison’s deferred tax assets for its other businesses were not material to its results of operations.

Note G — Environmental Matters

Superfund Sites

Hazardous substances, such as asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and coal tar, have been used or generated in the course of operations of the Utilities and their predecessors and are present at sites and in facilities and equipment they currently or previously owned, including sites at which gas was manufactured or stored.

The Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 and similar state statutes (Superfund) impose joint and several liability, regardless of fault, upon generators of hazardous substances for investigation and remediation costs (which include costs of demolition, removal, disposal, storage, replacement, containment, and monitoring) and natural resource damages. Liability under these laws can be material and may be imposed for contamination from past acts, even though such past acts may have been lawful at the time they occurred. The sites at which the Utilities have been asserted to have liability under these laws, including their manufactured gas plant sites and any neighboring areas to which contamination may have migrated, are referred to herein as “Superfund Sites.”

For Superfund Sites where there are other potentially responsible parties and the Utilities are not managing the site investigation and remediation, the accrued liability represents an estimate of the amount the Utilities will need to pay to discharge their related obligations. For Superfund Sites (including the manufactured gas plant sites) for which one of the Utilities is managing the investigation and remediation, the accrued liability represents an estimate of the company’s share of undiscounted cost to investigate the sites and, for sites that have been investigated in whole or in part, the cost to remediate the sites, if remediation is necessary and if a reasonable estimate of such cost can be made. Remediation costs are estimated in light of the information available, applicable remediation standards, and experience with similar sites.

    21


Table of Contents

The accrued liabilities and regulatory assets related to Superfund Sites at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:

 

     Con Edison   CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)   2010   2009   2010   2009

Accrued Liabilities:

       

Manufactured gas plant sites

  $ 197   $ 164   $ 115   $ 112

Other Superfund Sites

    49     48     48     47

Total

  $ 246   $ 212   $ 163   $ 159

Regulatory assets

  $ 421   $ 388   $ 334   $ 329

Most of the accrued Superfund Site liability relates to sites that have been investigated, in whole or in part. However, for many of the sites, the extent and associated cost of the required remediation has not yet been determined. As investigations progress and information pertaining to the required remediation becomes available, the Utilities expect that additional liability will be accrued, the amount of which is not presently determinable but may be material. Under their current rate agreements, the Utilities are permitted to recover or defer as regulatory assets (for subsequent recovery through rates) certain site investigation and remediation costs.

 

Insurance recoveries related to Superfund Sites for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were immaterial. There were no insurance recoveries received related to Superfund Sites for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Environmental remediation costs incurred related to Superfund Sites during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

 

     Con Edison   CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)   2010   2009   2010   2009

Remediation costs incurred

  $ 9   $ 16   $ 8   $ 16

In 2006, CECONY estimated that for its manufactured gas plant sites, its aggregate undiscounted potential liability for the investigation and remediation of coal tar and/or other manufactured gas plant-related environmental contaminants could range up to $1.1 billion. In 2007, O&R estimated that for its manufactured gas plant sites, each of which has been investigated, the aggregate undiscounted potential liability for the remediation of such contaminants could range up to $115 million. These estimates were based on the assumption that there is contamination at the sites that have not yet been investigated and additional assumptions about these and the other sites regarding the extent of contamination and the type and extent of remediation that may be required. Actual experience may be materially different.

22     


Table of Contents

Asbestos Proceedings

Suits have been brought in New York State and federal courts against the Utilities and many other defendants, wherein a large number of plaintiffs sought large amounts of compensatory and punitive damages for deaths and injuries allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos at various premises of the Utilities. The suits that have been resolved, which are many, have been resolved without any payment by the Utilities, or for amounts that were not, in the aggregate, material to them. The amounts specified in all the remaining thousands of suits total billions of dollars; however, the Utilities believe that these amounts are greatly exaggerated, based on the disposition of previous claims. In 2008, CECONY estimated that its aggregate undiscounted potential liability for these suits and additional suits that may be brought over the next 15 years is $9 million. The estimate was based upon a combination of modeling, historical data analysis and risk factor assessment. Actual experience may be materially different. In addition, certain current and former employees have claimed or are claiming workers’ compensation benefits based on alleged disability from exposure to asbestos. Under its current rate agreements, CECONY is permitted to defer as regulatory assets (for subsequent recovery through rates) costs incurred for its asbestos lawsuits and workers’ compensation claims. The accrued liability for asbestos suits and workers’ compensation proceedings (including those related to asbestos exposure) and the amounts deferred as regulatory assets for the Companies at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:

 

     Con Edison   CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)   2010   2009   2010   2009

Accrued liability – asbestos suits

  $ 10   $ 10   $ 9   $ 9

Regulatory assets – asbestos suits

  $ 10   $ 10   $ 9   $ 9

Accrued liability – workers’ compensation

  $ 111   $ 113   $ 106   $ 108

Regulatory assets – workers’ compensation

  $ 36   $ 37   $ 36   $ 37

 

Note H — Other Material Contingencies

Manhattan Steam Main Rupture

In July 2007, a CECONY steam main located in midtown Manhattan ruptured. It has been reported that one person died and others were injured as a result of the incident. Several buildings in the area were damaged. Debris from the incident included dirt and mud containing asbestos. The response to the incident required the closing of several buildings and streets for various periods. Approximately 100 suits are pending against the company seeking generally unspecified compensatory and, in some cases, punitive damages, for personal injury, property damage and business interruption. The company has not accrued a liability for the suits. The company has notified its insurers of the incident and believes that the policies in force at the time of the incident will cover most of the company’s costs, which the company is unable to estimate, but which could be substantial, to satisfy its liability to others in connection with the incident.

Investigation of Contractor Payments

In January 2009, CECONY commenced an internal investigation relating to the arrests of certain employees and retired employees (all of whom have been indicted, and most of whom have pleaded guilty) for accepting kickbacks from contractors that performed construction work for the company. The company has retained a law firm, which has retained an accounting firm, to assist in the company’s investigation. The company is providing information to governmental authorities, which consider the company to be a victim of unlawful conduct, in connection with their investigation of the arrested employees and contractors. The company has terminated its employment of the arrested employees and its contracts with the contractors (one of which is suing the company for substantial damages claiming wrongful termination). In February 2009, the NYSPSC commenced a proceeding that, among other things, will examine the prudence of certain of the company’s expenditures relating to the arrests and consider whether additional expenditures should also be examined (see “Other Regulatory Matters” in Note B). The company, based upon its evaluation of its internal controls for 2009 and previous years, believes that the controls were effective to provide reasonable

    23


Table of Contents

assurance that its financial statements have been fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Because the company’s investigation is ongoing, the company is unable to predict the impact of any of the employees’ unlawful conduct on the company’s internal controls, business, results of operations or financial position.

Permit Non-Compliance and Pollution Discharges

In March 2009, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) issued a proposed administrative Order on Consent to CECONY with respect to non-compliance with certain laws, regulations and permit conditions and discharges of pollutants at the company’s steam generating facilities. The proposed order effectively instituted a civil enforcement proceeding against the company. In the proposed order, the NYSDEC is seeking, among other things, the company’s agreement to pay a penalty in an amount the NYSDEC did not specify, retain an independent consultant to conduct a comprehensive audit of the company’s generating facilities to determine compliance with federal and New York State environmental laws and regulations and recommend best practices, remove all equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls from the company’s steam and electric facilities, remediate polychlorinated biphenyl contamination, install certain wastewater treatment facilities, and comply with additional sampling, monitoring, and training requirements. In March 2010, the NYSDEC issued a revised proposed consent order specifying the amount of penalty the NYSDEC is seeking at $10.8 million.

Also in January 2010, the NYSDEC staff indicated that the NYSDEC intends to issue a proposed consent order relating to the release of oil into the Bronx River resulting from a November 2009 transformer fire at the company’s Dunwoodie electric substation.

The company will seek to resolve these matters through negotiations with the NYSDEC. It is unable to predict the impact of these matters on the company’s operations or the amount of penalties and the additional costs, which could be substantial, to comply with the requirements resulting from these matters.

 

In January 2010, the NYSDEC issued a proposed administrative Order on Consent to CECONY relating to discharges of pollutants, reported by the company to the NYSDEC from 2002 through 2009, into the storm sewer system at a property the company owns in the Astoria section of New York on which the company is permitted by the NYSDEC to operate a hazardous waste storage facility. In April 2010, the NYSDEC issued an order, to which CECONY consented, pursuant to which CECONY will pay a $1.1 million penalty and undertake a corrective action plan that will require the company to incur an estimated $10 million of capital expenditures.

Lease In/Lease Out Transactions

In each of 1997 and 1999, Con Edison Development entered into a transaction in which it leased property and then immediately subleased it back to the lessor (termed “Lease In/Lease Out,” or LILO transactions). The transactions respectively involve electric generating and gas distribution facilities in the Netherlands, with a total investment of $259 million. The transactions were financed with $93 million of equity and $166 million of non-recourse, long-term debt secured by the underlying assets. In accordance with the accounting rules for leases, Con Edison is accounting for the two LILO transactions as leveraged leases. Accordingly, the company’s investment in these leases, net of non-recourse debt, is carried as a single amount in Con Edison’s consolidated balance sheet and income is recognized pursuant to a method that incorporates a level rate of return for those years when net investment in the lease is positive, based upon the after-tax cash flows projected at the inception of the leveraged leases. The company’s investment in these leveraged leases was $(29) million at March 31, 2010 and $(24) million at December 31, 2009 and is comprised of a $235 million gross investment less $264 million deferred tax liabilities at March 31, 2010 and $235 million gross investment less $259 million of deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2009.

On audit of Con Edison’s tax return for 1997, the IRS disallowed the tax losses in connection with the 1997 LILO transaction. In December 2005, Con Edison paid a $0.3 million income tax deficiency asserted by the IRS for the tax year 1997 with respect to the 1997

24     


Table of Contents

LILO transaction. In April 2006, the company paid interest of $0.2 million associated with the deficiency and commenced an action in the United States Court of Federal Claims, entitled Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. United States, to obtain a refund of this tax payment and interest. A trial was completed in November 2007. In October 2009, the court issued a decision in favor of the company concluding that the 1997 LILO transaction was, in substance, a true lease that possessed economic substance, the loans relating to the lease constituted bona fide indebtedness, and the deductions for the 1997 LILO transactions claimed by the company in its 1997 federal income tax return are allowable. The IRS is entitled to appeal the decision.

In connection with its audit of Con Edison’s federal income tax returns for 1998 through 2007, the IRS disallowed $416 million of net tax deductions taken with respect to both of the LILO transactions for the tax years. Con Edison is pursuing administrative appeals of these audit level disallowances. In connection with its audit of Con Edison’s federal income tax return for 2008, the IRS has disallowed $42 million of net tax deductions taken with respect to both of the LILO transactions. When this audit level disallowance becomes appealable, Con Edison intends to file an appeal of the disallowance.

Con Edison believes that its LILO transactions have been correctly reported, and has not recorded any reserve with respect to the disallowance of tax losses, or related interest, in connection with its LILO transactions. Con Edison’s estimated tax savings, reflected in its financial statements, from the two LILO transactions through March 31, 2010, in the aggregate, was $209 million. If Con Edison were required to repay all or a portion of these amounts, it would also be required to pay interest of up to $65 million net of tax at March 31, 2010.

 

Pursuant to the accounting rules for leveraged lease transactions, the expected timing of income tax cash flows generated by Con Edison’s LILO transactions are required to be reviewed at least annually. If the expected timing of the cash flows is revised, the rate of return and the allocation of income would be recalculated from the inception of the LILO transactions, and the company would be required to recalculate the accounting effect of the LILO transactions, which would result in a charge to earnings that could have a material adverse effect on the company’s results of operations.

Guarantees

Con Edison and its subsidiaries enter into various agreements providing financial or performance assurance primarily to third parties on behalf of their subsidiaries. Maximum amounts guaranteed by Con Edison totaled $939 million and $929 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

A summary, by type (described in Note H to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K) and term, of Con Edison’s total guarantees at March 31, 2010 is as follows:

 

Guarantee Type   0 – 3 years   4 – 10 years   > 10 years   Total
    (Millions of Dollars)

Commodity transactions

  $ 647   $ 19   $ 155   $ 821

Affordable housing program

    6             6

Intra-company guarantees

    30         1     31

Other guarantees

    61     20         81

TOTAL

  $ 744   $ 39   $ 156   $ 939

Note I — Financial Information by Business Segment

Reference is made to Note N to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

    25


Table of Contents

The financial data for the business segments are as follows:

 

     For the Three Months Ended March 31,  
    

Operating

revenues

    Inter-segment
revenues
    Depreciation and
amortization
 

Operating

income

 
(Millions of Dollars)   2010     2009     2010     2009     2010   2009   2010     2009  

CECONY

               

Electric

  $ 1,728      $ 1,658      $ 3      $ 3      $ 151   $ 142   $ 195      $ 138   

Gas

    683        781        1        1        25     24     215        204   

Steam

    307        331        18        18        15     15     102        91   

Consolidation adjustments

                  (22     (22                      

Total CECONY

  $ 2,718      $ 2,770      $      $      $ 191   $ 181   $ 512      $ 433   

O&R

               

Electric

  $ 161      $ 146      $      $      $ 8   $ 7   $ 5      $ 7   

Gas

    90        106                      3     3     23        22   

Total O&R

  $ 251      $ 252      $      $      $ 11   $ 10   $ 28      $ 29   

Competitive energy businesses

  $ 500      $ 412      $ 2      $ (2   $ 2   $ 1   $ (48   $ (43

Other*

    (7     (11     (2     2                         

Total Con Edison

  $ 3,462      $ 3,423      $      $      $ 204   $ 192   $ 492      $ 419   

 

* Parent company expenses, primarily interest, and consolidation adjustments. Other does not represent a business segment.

 

Note J — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging, derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value, unless an exception is available under the accounting rules. Certain qualifying derivative contracts have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts. These contracts are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules.

Energy Price Hedging

Con Edison’s subsidiaries hedge market price fluctuations associated with physical purchases and sales of electricity, natural gas, and steam by using derivative instruments including futures, forwards, basis swaps, options, transmission congestion contracts and financial transmission rights contracts. The fair values of these hedges at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:

 

     Con Edison     CECONY  
(Millions of Dollars)   2010     2009     2010     2009  

Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) – gross

  $ (563   $ (266   $ (327   $ (137

Impact of netting of cash collateral

    356        162        197        87   

Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) – net

  $ (207   $ (104   $ (130   $ (50

 

Credit Exposure

The Companies are exposed to credit risk related to transactions entered into primarily for the various energy supply and hedging activities by the Utilities and the competitive energy businesses. The Companies use credit policies to manage this risk, including an established credit approval process, monitoring of counterparty limits, netting provisions within agreements, collateral or prepayment arrangements, credit insurance and credit default swaps.

At March 31, 2010, Con Edison and CECONY had $220 million and $28 million of credit exposure in connection with energy supply and hedging activities, net of collateral, respectively. Con Edison’s net credit exposure consisted of $147 million with investment-grade counterparties, $72 million primarily with commodity exchange brokers or independent system operators, and $1 million with non-investment grade counterparties. CECONY’s entire net credit exposure was with commodity exchange brokers.

Economic Hedges

The Companies enter into certain derivative instruments that do not qualify or are not designated as hedges under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging. However, management believes these instruments represent economic hedges that mitigate exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices.

26     


Table of Contents

The fair values of the Companies’ commodity derivatives at March 31, 2010 were:

 

(Millions of Dollars)  

Fair Value of Commodity Derivatives(a)

Balance Sheet Location

 

Con

Edison

    CECONY  
Asset Derivatives  

Current

  Fair value of derivative assets   $ 304      $ 14   

Long term

  Other deferred charges and non-current assets     193        2   

Total asset derivatives

    $ 497      $ 16   

Impact of netting

        (324     20   

Net asset derivatives

      $ 173      $ 36   
Liability Derivatives  

Current

  Fair value of derivative liabilities   $ 725      $ 216   

Long term

  Fair value of derivative liabilities     335        127   

Total liability derivatives

    $ 1,060      $ 343   

Impact of netting

        (680     (177

Net liability derivatives

      $ 380      $ 166   

 

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

The fair value of the Companies’ commodity derivatives at December 31, 2009 were:

 

(Millions of Dollars)  

Fair Value of Commodity Derivatives(a)

Balance Sheet Location

 

Con

Edison

    CECONY  
Asset Derivatives  

Current

  Fair value of derivative assets   $ 213      $ 40   

Long term

  Other deferred charges and non-current assets     148        19   

Total asset derivatives

    $ 361      $ 59   

Impact of netting

        (231     (20

Net asset derivatives

      $ 130      $ 39   
Liability Derivatives  

Current

  Fair value of derivative liabilities   $ 401      $ 110   

Long term

  Fair value of derivative liabilities     226        86   

Total liability derivatives

    $ 627      $ 196   

Impact of netting

        (393     (107

Net liability derivatives

      $ 234      $ 89   

 

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

 

The Utilities generally recover all of their prudently incurred fuel, purchased power and gas costs, including hedging gains and losses, in accordance with rate provisions approved by the applicable state utility commissions. See “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. In accordance with the accounting rules for regulated operations, the Utilities record a regulatory asset or liability to defer recognition of unrealized gains and losses on their electric and gas derivatives. As gains and losses are realized in future periods, they will be recognized as purchased power, gas and fuel costs in the Companies’ consolidated income statements. Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses record realized and unrealized gains and losses on their derivative contracts in earnings in the reporting period in which they occur.

    27


Table of Contents

The following table presents the changes in the fair values of commodity derivatives that have been deferred or recognized in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2010:

 

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a)

Deferred or Recognized in Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010

 
(Millions of Dollars)   Balance Sheet Location   Con Edison     CECONY  

Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:

  

Current

  Deferred derivative gains   $ (6   $ (6

Total deferred gains

      $ (6   $ (6

Current

  Deferred derivative losses   $ (161   $ (138

Current

  Recoverable energy costs   $ (55   $ (42

Long term

  Regulatory assets   $ (74   $ (56

Total deferred losses

    $ (290   $ (236

Net deferred losses

      $ (296   $ (242
    Income Statement Location                

Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income

  

  Purchased power expense   $ (70 )(b)    $   
  Gas purchased for resale     5          
    Non-utility revenue     14 (b)        

Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income

      $ (51   $   

 

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.
(b) For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax gain/(loss) of $46 million and $(110) million, respectively.

The following table presents the changes in the fair values of commodity derivatives that have been deferred or recognized in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2009:

 

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a)

Deferred or Recognized in Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009

 
(Millions of Dollars)   Balance Sheet Location   Con Edison     CECONY  

Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:

  

Current

  Deferred derivative gains   $ (4   $ (4

Total deferred gains

      $ (4   $ (4

Current

  Deferred derivative losses   $ (36   $ (23

Current

  Recoverable energy costs   $ (181   $ (157

Long term

  Regulatory assets   $ (45   $ (31

Total deferred losses

    $ (262   $ (211

Net deferred losses

      $ (266   $ (215
    Income Statement Location                

Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income

  

  Purchased power expense   $ (111 )(b)    $   
  Gas purchased for resale     3          
    Non-utility revenue     76 (b)        

Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income

      $ (32   $   

 

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.
(b) For the three months ended March 31, 2009, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues an unrealized pre-tax loss of $57 million.
28     


Table of Contents

As of March 31, 2010, Con Edison had 1,477 contracts, including 726 CECONY contracts, which were considered to be derivatives under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging (excluding qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts). The following table presents the number of contracts by commodity type:

 

     Electric Derivatives   Gas Derivatives
     Number of
Energy
Contracts(a)
  MWhs(b)   Number of
Capacity
Contracts(a)
  MWs(b)   Number of
Contracts(a)
  Dths(b)  

Total
Number Of

Contracts(a)

Con Edison

  647   16,588,038   97   6,580   733   143,057,500   1,477

CECONY

  121   3,756,950       605   133,790,000   726

 

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.
(b) Volumes are reported net of long and short positions.

 

The Companies also enter into electric congestion and gas basis swap contracts to hedge the congestion and transportation charges which are associated with electric and gas contracts and hedged volumes.

The collateral requirements associated with, and settlement of, derivative transactions are included in net cash flows from operating activities in the Companies’ consolidated statement of cash flows. Most derivative instrument contracts contain provisions that may require the Companies to provide collateral on derivative instruments in net liability positions. The amount of collateral to be provided will depend on the fair value of the derivative instruments and the Companies’ credit ratings.

The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position and collateral posted at March 31, 2010, and the additional collateral that would have been required to be posted had the lowest applicable credit rating been reduced one level and to below investment grade were:

 

(Millions of Dollars)   Con Edison(a)     CECONY(a)  

Aggregate fair value – net liabilities

  $ 552      $ 217   

Collateral posted

  $ 352      $ 170 (b) 

Additional collateral(c) (downgrade one level from current ratings(d))

  $ 59      $ 37   

Additional collateral(c) (downgrade to below investment grade from current ratings(d))

  $ 367 (e)    $ 113   

 

(a) Non-derivative transactions for the purchase and sale of electricity and gas and qualifying derivative instruments, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales, are excluded from the table. These transactions primarily include purchases of electricity from independent system operators. In the event the Utilities and Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses were no longer extended unsecured credit for such purchases, the Companies would be required to post collateral, which at March 31, 2010, would have amounted to an estimated $139 million for Con Edison, including $68 million for CECONY. For certain other such non-derivative transactions, the Companies could be required to post collateral under certain circumstances, including in the event counterparties had reasonable grounds for insecurity.
(b) Across the Utilities’ energy derivative positions, credit limits for the same counterparties are generally integrated. At March 31, 2010, all collateral for these positions was posted by CECONY, including an estimated $46 million attributable to O&R.
(c) The Companies measure the collateral requirements by taking into consideration the fair value amounts of derivative instruments that contain credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liabilities position plus amounts owed to counterparties for settled transactions and amounts required by counterparties for minimum financial security. The fair value amounts represent unrealized losses, net of any unrealized gains where the Companies have a legally enforceable right of setoff.
(d) The current ratings are Moody’s, S&P and Fitch long-term credit rating of, as applicable, Con Edison (Baa1/BBB+/BBB+), CECONY (A3/A-/A-) or O&R (Baa1/A-/A). Credit ratings assigned by rating agencies are expressions of opinions that are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency.
(e) Derivative instruments that are net assets have been excluded from the table. At March 31, 2010, if Con Edison had been downgraded to below investment grade, it would have been required to post additional collateral for such derivative instruments of not more than $34 million.

Interest Rate Swaps

O&R has an interest rate swap related to its Series 1994A Debt. See Note C to the financial statement in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. O&R pays a fixed-rate of 6.09 percent and receives a LIBOR-based variable rate. The fair value of this interest rate swap at March 31, 2010 was an unrealized loss of $11 million, which has been included in Con Edison’s consolidated balance sheet as a noncurrent liability/fair value of derivative liabilities and a regulatory asset. There was no material change in the fair value of the swap for the three months ended March 31, 2010. In the event O&R’s credit rating was downgraded to BBB- or lower by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services or Baa3 or lower by Moody’s Investors Service, the swap counterparty could elect to terminate the agreement and, if it did so, the parties would then be required to settle the transaction.

    29


Table of Contents

Note K — Fair Value Measurements

Effective January 1, 2010, the Companies adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” except as discussed in the following paragraph. This update requires the Companies to disclose significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. The guidance also clarifies level of disaggregation and disclosure requirements about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements and the meaning of a class of assets and liabilities.

In addition, the update requires the Companies to present information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). This disclosure is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years.

 

The accounting rules for fair value measurements and disclosures established a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value in three broad levels. The rules require that assets and liabilities be classified in their entirety based on the level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Assessing the significance of a particular input may require judgment considering factors specific to the asset or liability, and may affect the valuation of the asset or liability and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. See Note P to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for how the Companies classify fair value balances based on the fair value hierarchy.

The valuation technique used by the Companies with regard to commodity derivatives and other assets that fall into either Level 2 or Level 3 is the market approach, which uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The valuation technique used by the Companies with regard to the interest rate contract that falls into Level 3 is the income approach which uses valuation techniques to convert future income stream amounts to a single amount in present value terms.

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010 are summarized below.

 

     Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Netting
Adjustments(4)
    Total
(Millions of Dollars)   Con
Edison
  CECONY   Con
Edison
  CECONY   Con
Edison
  CECONY   Con
Edison
    CECONY     Con
Edison
  CECONY

Derivative assets:

                   

Commodity(1)

  $ 2   $ 1   $ 106   $ 4   $ 322   $ 9   $ (257   $ 22      $ 173   $ 36

Other assets(3)

    35     35             93     84                   128     119

Total

  $ 37   $ 36   $ 106   $ 4   $ 415   $ 93   $ (257   $ 22      $ 301   $ 155

Derivative liabilities:

                   

Commodity(1)

  $ 12   $ 11   $ 490   $ 273   $ 490   $ 57   $ (612   $ (175   $ 380   $ 166

Interest rate contract(2)

                    11                       11    

Total

  $ 12   $ 11   $ 490   $ 273   $ 501   $ 57   $ (612   $ (175   $ 391   $ 166

 

(1) A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note J.
(2) See Note J.
(3) Other assets are comprised of assets such as life insurance contracts within the Deferred Income Plan and Supplemental Retirement Income Plans, held in rabbi trusts.
(4) Amounts represent the impact of legally-enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Companies to net gain and loss positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.
30     


Table of Contents

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 are summarized below.

 

     Level 1   Level 2   Level 3  

Netting

Adjustments(4)

    Total
(Millions of Dollars)   Con
Edison
  CECONY   Con
Edison
  CECONY   Con
Edison
  CECONY   Con
Edison
    CECONY     Con
Edison
  CECONY

Derivative assets:

                   

Commodity(1)

  $ 3   $ 3   $ 92   $ 21   $ 201   $ 17   $ (166   $ (2   $ 130   $ 39

Other assets(3)

    36     36             92     83                   128     119

Total

  $ 39   $ 39   $ 92   $ 21   $ 293   $ 100   $ (166   $ (2   $ 258   $ 158

Derivative liabilities:

                   

Commodity(1)

  $ 6   $ 1   $ 296   $ 155   $ 260   $ 22   $ (328   $ (89   $ 234   $ 89

Interest rate contract(2)

                    11                       11    

Total

  $ 6   $ 1   $ 296   $ 155   $ 271   $ 22   $ (328   $ (89   $ 245   $ 89

 

(1) A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.
(2) See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.
(3) Other assets are comprised of assets such as life insurance contracts within the Deferred Income Plan and Supplemental Retirement Income Plans, held in rabbi trusts.
(4) Amounts represent the impact of legally-enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Companies to net gain and loss positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

The table listed below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending net balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 and classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:

 

     For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010  
           

Total Gains/(Losses)—

Realized and Unrealized

                    
(Millions of Dollars)   Beginning
Balance as of
January 1, 2010
    Included in
Earnings
    Included in Regulatory
Assets and Liabilities
    Purchases,
Issuances, Sales
and Settlements
    Transfer
In/Out of
Level 3
 

Ending

Balance as of
March 31, 2010

 

Con Edison

           

Derivatives:

           

Commodity

  $ (59   $ (51   $ (72   $ 14      $   $ (168

Interest rate contract

    (11     (1            1            (11

Other(1)

    92               1                   93   

Total

  $ 22      $ (52   $ (71   $ 15      $   $ (86

CECONY

           

Derivatives:

           

Commodity

  $ (5   $ (5   $ (33   $ (5   $   $ (48

Other(1)

    83               1                   84   

Total

  $ 78      $ (5   $ (32   $ (5   $   $ 36   

 

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.
    31


Table of Contents
     For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009  
           

Total Gains/(Losses) –

Realized and Unrealized

                  
(Millions of Dollars)   Beginning
Balance as of
January 1, 2009
    Included in
Earnings
    Included in Regulatory
Assets and Liabilities
    Purchases,
Issuances, Sales
and Settlements
  Transfer
In/Out of
Level 3
 

Ending

Balance as of
March 31, 2009

 

Con Edison

           

Derivatives:

           

Commodity

  $ (50   $ (29   $ (52   $ 16   $   $ (115

Interest rate contract

    (15     (1     1        1         (14

Other(1)

    73        (2     (3             68   

Total

  $ 8      $ (32   $ (54   $ 17   $   $ (61

CECONY

           

Derivatives:

           

Commodity

  $ 1      $ (1   $ (8   $ 1   $   $ (7

Other(1)

    65        (2     (2             61   

Total

  $ 66      $ (3   $ (10   $ 1   $   $ 54   

 

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

 

For the Utilities, realized gains and losses on Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities are reported as part of purchased power, gas and fuel costs. The Utilities generally recover these costs in accordance with rate provisions approved by the applicable state public utilities commissions. See Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. Unrealized gains and losses for commodity derivatives are generally deferred on the consolidated balance sheet in accordance with the accounting rules for regulated operations.

For the competitive energy businesses, realized and unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities are reported in non-utility revenues ($60 million gain and $14 million loss) and purchased power costs ($89 million loss and $1 million loss) on the consolidated income statement for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The change in fair value relating to Level 3 commodity derivative assets held at March 31, 2010 and 2009 is included in non-utility revenues ($46 million gain and $15 million loss) and purchased power costs ($71 million loss and immaterial) on the consolidated income statement for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Note L — Variable Interest Entities

Reference is made to Notes Q and T to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. Effective January 1, 2010, the Companies adopted ASU No. 2009-17, “Consolidations (Topic 810): Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities.” The Companies have not identified any interests they have in any variable interest entity (VIE) that would require the Companies to include the accounts of the VIE in the Companies’ consolidated financial statements. In the first quarter of 2010, CECONY again requested from five potential VIEs (Sithe/Independence Power Partners, LP, Cogen Technologies Linden Venture, LP, Selkirk Cogen Partners, LP, Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners, LP, and Indeck Energy Services of Corinth, Inc.), with which CECONY has long-term electricity purchase agreements, the information necessary to determine whether the entity is a VIE and whether CECONY is its primary beneficiary. The information was not made available. CECONY also has a long-term electricity purchase agreement with Astoria Energy, LLC (Astoria Energy). CECONY has determined that Astoria Energy is a VIE, and that CECONY is not its primary beneficiary since CECONY does not have the power to direct the activities that CECONY believes most significantly impact the economic performance of Astoria Energy. In particular, CECONY has not invested in, or guaranteed the indebtedness of, Astoria Energy and CECONY does not operate or maintain Astoria Energy’s generating facilities. CECONY’s significant involvement with the entities with which it entered into long-term electricity purchase agreements is

32     


Table of Contents

CECONY’s purchase of energy and capacity under the agreements, as to which CECONY’s maximum exposure to the entities is limited pursuant to the agreements. For information about the agreements, see Note I to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Note M — New Financial Accounting Standards

Reference is made to Note T to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

 

In February 2010, the FASB issued new guidance for subsequent events through ASU No. 2010-09, “Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements.” The amendments in this update to the ASC alleviates potentially conflicting disclosure requirements by the SEC and FASB. The amendment defines “SEC filer” and “revised financial statements”, removes the definition for “public entity” from the glossary and eliminates requirements for SEC filers to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated.

    33


Table of Contents

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This combined management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (MD&A) relates to the consolidated financial statements (the First Quarter Financial Statements) included in this report of two separate registrants: Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY) and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto. As used in this report, the term the “Companies” refers to Con Edison and CECONY. CECONY is a subsidiary of Con Edison and, as such, information in this MD&A about CECONY applies to Con Edison.

 

This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the First Quarter Financial Statements and the notes thereto and the MD&A in Item 7 of the Companies’ combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (File Nos. 1-14514 and 1-1217, the Form 10-K).

Information in any item of this report referred to in this discussion and analysis is incorporated by reference herein. The use of terms such as “see” or “refer to” shall be deemed to incorporate by reference into this discussion and analysis the information to which reference is made.

 

Overview

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison), incorporated in New York State in 1997, is a holding company which owns all of the outstanding common stock of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (O&R) and its competitive energy businesses. As used in this report, the term the “Utilities” refers to CECONY and O&R.

LOGO

 

CECONY’s principal business operations are its regulated electric, gas and steam delivery businesses. O&R’s principal business operations are its regulated electric and gas delivery businesses. The competitive energy businesses sell electricity to wholesale and retail customers, provide certain energy-related services, and participate in energy infrastructure projects. Con Edison is evaluating additional opportunities to invest in electric and gas-related businesses.

 

Con Edison’s strategy is to provide reliable energy services, maintain public and employee safety, promote energy efficiency, and develop cost-effective ways of performing its business. Con Edison seeks to be a responsible steward of the environment and enhance its relationships with customers, regulators and members of the communities it serves.

34     


Table of Contents

CECONY

Electric

CECONY provides electric service to approximately 3.3 million customers in all of New York City (except part of Queens) and most of Westchester County, an approximately 660 square mile service area with a population of more than nine million.

Gas

CECONY delivers gas to approximately 1.1 million customers in Manhattan, the Bronx and parts of Queens and Westchester County.

Steam

CECONY operates the largest steam distribution system in the United States by producing and delivering more than 23,000 MMlbs of steam annually to approximately 1,760 customers in parts of Manhattan.

Orange and Rockland

Electric

O&R and its utility subsidiaries, Rockland Electric Company (RECO) and Pike County Power & Light Company (Pike) (together referred to herein as O&R) provide electric service to approximately 0.3 million customers in southeastern New York and in adjacent areas of northern New Jersey and northeastern Pennsylvania, an approximately 1,350 square mile service area.

Gas

O&R delivers gas to over 0.1 million customers in southeastern New York and adjacent areas of northeastern Pennsylvania.

Competitive Energy Businesses

Con Edison pursues competitive energy opportunities through three wholly-owned subsidiaries: Con Edison Solutions, Con Edison Energy and Con Edison Development. These businesses include the sales and related hedging of electricity to wholesale and retail customers, sales of certain energy-related products and services, and participation in energy infrastructure projects. At March 31, 2010, Con Edison’s equity investment in its competitive energy businesses was $249 million and their assets amounted to $710 million.

 

Certain financial data of Con Edison’s businesses is presented below:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31, 2010     At March 31, 2010  
(Millions of Dollars)   Operating
Revenues
    Net Income for
Common Stock
    Assets  

CECONY

  $ 2,718      79   $ 243      107   $ 30,977   90

O&R

    251      7     13      6     2,232   6

Total Utilities

    2,969      86     256      113     33,209   96

Con Edison Development

                      429   1

Con Edison Energy(a)

    155      4     9      4     168   1

Con Edison Solutions(a)

    347      10     (37   (16)     246   1

Other(b)

    (9       (2   (1)     397   1

Total Con Edison

  $ 3,462      100   $ 226      100   $ 34,449   100

 

(a) Net income from the competitive energy businesses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 includes $(38) million of net after-tax mark-to-market losses (Con Edison Energy, $11 million and Con Edison Solutions, $(49) million).
(b) Represents inter-company and parent company accounting. See “Results of Operations,” below.

 

Con Edison’s net income for common stock for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $226 million or $0.80 a share compared with earnings of $180 million or $0.66 a share for the three months ended March 31, 2009. See “Results of Operations – Summary,” below.

    35


Table of Contents

Results of Operations — Summary

Net income for common stock for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:

 

(Millions of Dollars)   2010     2009  

CECONY

  $ 243      $ 197   

O&R

    13        12   

Competitive energy businesses(a)

    (28     (25

Other(b)

    (2     (4

Con Edison

  $ 226      $ 180   

 

(a) Includes $(38) million and $(34) million of net after-tax mark-to-market losses in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(b) Represents inter-company and parent company accounting. See “Results of Operations,” below.

The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared with the 2009 period, reflect changes in the Utilities’ rate plans. These rate plans include an increase in the allowed electric return on common equity for CECONY. The rate plans provide for additional revenues to cover expected increases, discussed below, in certain operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation and property taxes and interest charges. The results of operations include the operating results of the competitive energy businesses, including net mark-to market effects.

 

The increases in operations and maintenance expenses reflect higher costs for pension and other post-retirement benefits, demand management programs and regulatory assessments in the 2010 period. Depreciation and property taxes were higher in the 2010 period reflecting primarily the impact from higher utility plant balances. Interest charges were higher in the 2010 period reflecting higher amounts of outstanding long-term debt.

 

The following table presents the estimated effect on earnings per share and net income for common stock for the 2010 period compared with the 2009 period, resulting from these and other major factors:

 

    

Earnings

per Share
Variation

   

Net Income for
Common Stock
Variation

(Millions of Dollars)

 

CECONY(a)

   

Rate plans, primarily to recover increases in certain costs

  $ 0.52      $ 143   

Operations and maintenance expense

    (0.23     (64

Depreciation and property taxes

    (0.16     (44

Net interest expense

    (0.03     (8

Other (includes dilutive effect of new stock issuances)

    0.04        19   

Total CECONY

    0.14        46   

O&R

           1   

Competitive energy businesses

   

Earnings excluding net mark-to-market effects

           1   

Net mark-to-market effects(b)

    (0.01     (4

Total competitive energy businesses

    (0.01     (3

Other, including parent company expenses

    0.01        2   

Total variation

  $ 0.14      $ 46   

 

(a) Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms in CECONY’s electric and gas rate plans and the weather-normalization clause applicable to the gas business, revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Under CECONY’s rate plans, pension and other post-retirement costs and certain other costs are reconciled to amounts reflected in rates for such costs. See Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.
(b) These variations reflect after-tax net mark-to-market losses of $38 million or $(0.13) a share in the first quarter of 2010 and after-tax net mark-to-market losses of $34 million or $(0.12) a share in the first quarter of 2009.

 

See “Results of Operations” below for further discussion and analysis of results of operations.

 

Risk Factors

The Companies’ businesses are influenced by many factors that are difficult to predict, and that involve uncertainties that may materially affect actual operating

36     


Table of Contents

results, cash flows and financial condition. The factors include those described under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the Form 10-K.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The Companies’ financial statements reflect the application of their accounting policies, which conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Companies’ critical accounting policies include industry-specific accounting applicable to regulated public utilities and accounting for pensions and other postretirement benefits, contingencies, long-lived assets, derivative instruments, goodwill and leases. See “Application of Critical Accounting Policies” in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Companies’ liquidity reflects cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as shown on their respective consolidated statement of cash flows and as discussed below. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Item 7 of the Form 10-K. Changes in the Companies’ cash and temporary cash investments resulting from operating, investing and financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows:

 

     Con Edison     CECONY  
(Millions of Dollars)   2010     2009     Variance     2010     2009     Variance  

Operating activities

  $ 1      $ 645      $ (644   $ 22      $ 636      $ (614

Investing activities

    (460     (526     66        (441     (397     (44

Financing activities

    286        458        (172     317        326        (9

Net change

    (173     577        (750     (102     565        (667

Balance at beginning of period

    260        74        186        131        37        94   

Balance at end of period

  $ 87      $ 651      $ (564   $ 29      $ 602      $ (573

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

The Utilities’ cash flows from operating activities reflect principally their energy sales and deliveries and cost of operations. The volume of energy sales and deliveries is dependent primarily on factors external to the Utilities, such as growth of customer demand, weather, market prices for energy, and economic conditions. Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms in the Utilities’ electric and gas rate plans in New York, changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved may affect the timing of cash flows but not net income. See Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. The prices at which the Utilities provide energy to their customers are determined in accordance with their rate agreements. In general, changes in the Utilities’ cost of purchased power, fuel and gas may affect the timing of cash flows but not net income because the costs are recovered in accordance with rate agreements. See “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Net income is the result of cash and non-cash (or accrual) transactions. Only cash transactions affect the Companies’ cash flows from operating activities. Principal non-cash charges include depreciation, deferred income tax expense, and net derivative losses. Principal non-cash credits include amortizations of certain net regulatory liabilities and net derivative gains. Non-cash charges or credits may also be accrued under the revenue decoupling and cost reconciliation mechanisms in the Utilities’ electric and gas rate plans in New York. See “Rate Agreements” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Net cash flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 for Con Edison and CECONY were $644 million and $614 million lower, respectively, than in the 2009 period. The decreases in net cash flows reflect the January 2010 semi-annual payment of CECONY’s New York City property taxes, without a comparable semi-annual payment in January 2009. The Company achieved a 1.5 percent reduction in its New York City property taxes for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009 by prepaying the annual tax amount in July 2008.

    37


Table of Contents

The change in net cash flows also reflects the timing of payments for and recovery of energy costs. This timing issue is reflected within changes to accounts receivable – customers, recoverable energy costs, and accounts payable balances.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

Net cash flows used in investing activities for Con Edison were $66 million lower for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period. The decrease reflects primarily decreased construction expenditures in 2010. Net cash flows used in investing activities for CECONY were $44 million higher in the 2010 period compared with the 2009 period reflecting primarily the repayment of loans by O&R to CECONY in the 2009 period, offset in part by decreased construction expenditures in the 2010 period. See Note S to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 for Con Edison and CECONY were $172 million and $9 million lower, respectively, than in the 2009 period.

In March 2009, CECONY issued $275 million 5.55% 5-year debentures and $475 million 6.65% 10-year debentures.

 

Cash flows from financing activities of the Companies also reflect commercial paper issuance (included on the consolidated balance sheets as “Notes payable”). The commercial paper amounts outstanding at March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 and the average daily balances for three months ended, March 31, 2010 and 2009 for Con Edison and CECONY were as follows:

 

     2010     2009  
(Millions of Dollars, except
Weighted Average Yield)
  Outstanding at
March 31
    YTD
average
    Outstanding at
March 31
    YTD
average
 

Con Edison

  $ 475      $ 297      $ 222      $ 366   

CECONY

  $ 475      $ 296      $      $ 225   

Weighted average yield

    0.3     0.3     0.6     0.6

 

Cash flows from financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 also reflect the issuance of Con Edison common shares through its dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans (2010: 647,731 shares for $14 million, 2009: 532,533 shares for $6 million). In addition, as a result of the stock plan issuances, cash used to pay common stock dividends was reduced by $12 million in both periods.

 

Common stock issuances and external borrowings are sources of liquidity that could be affected by changes in credit ratings, financial performance and capital market conditions. For information about the Companies’ credit ratings and certain financial ratios, see “Capital Requirements and Resources – Capital Resources” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K.

38     


Table of Contents

Other Changes in Assets and Liabilities

The following table shows changes in certain assets and liabilities at March 31, 2010, compared with December 31, 2009.

 

(Millions of Dollars)   Con Edison
2010 vs. 2009
Variance
    CECONY
2010 vs. 2009
Variance
 

Assets

   

Accrued unbilled revenue

  $ (157   $ (128

Deferred derivative losses – current

    161        138   

Gas in storage

    (81     (62

Prepayments

    289        284   

Regulatory asset – unrecognized pension and other post-retirement benefit deferrals

    (183     (166

Liabilities

   

Regulatory liability – Net unbilled revenue deferrals

    (68     (68

Regulatory liability – Refundable energy costs

    (52     (42

Fair value of derivative liabilities – current

    98        75   

Pension and retiree benefits

    (195     (186

 

Accrued Unbilled Revenues/Net Unbilled Revenues

The decrease in accrued unbilled revenues and the regulatory liability for net unbilled revenues reflects primarily the colder weather in December 2009 compared with March 2010.

Refundable Energy Costs

The decrease in refundable energy costs reflects primarily the timing of the recovery and changes in pricing of electric and gas commodity costs.

Deferred Derivative Losses/Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities – Current

The increase in deferred derivative losses-current and fair value of derivative liabilities-current reflects lower forward electric and gas commodity prices at March 31, 2010 compared to year-end 2009 and the maturity of certain contract positions in CECONY's hedging portfolios.

Natural Gas in Storage

The decrease in natural gas in storage is due primarily to the winter withdrawal period (November through March) and lower prices at March 31, 2010 compared with year-end 2009.

Prepayments

The increase in prepayments is due primarily to CECONY’s January 2010 payment of its New York City semi-annual property taxes, offset by three months of amortization, while the December 2009 balance is fully amortized.

Regulatory Asset for Unrecognized Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Costs and Non-Current Liability for Pension and Retiree Benefits

The decreases in the regulatory asset for unrecognized pension and other post-retirement benefit costs and the non-current liability for pension and retiree benefits reflects the final actuarial valuation of the underfunding of the pension and other retiree benefit plans as measured at December 31, 2009 in accordance with the accounting rules for pensions. The decrease in the non-current liability for pension and retiree benefits also reflects CECONY’s first quarter 2010 contribution to the pension plan. See Notes B, E and F to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note E to the First Quarter Financial Statements.

Capital Requirements and Resources

At March 31, 2010, there was no material change in the Companies’ capital requirements and resources compared to those disclosed under “Capital Requirements and Resources – Capital Requirements” and “Capital Requirement and Resources – Capital Resources” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K, other than as described below.

    39


Table of Contents

For each of the Companies, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges (Securities and Exchange Commission basis) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and the 12 months ended December 31, 2009 was:

 

     Earnings to Fixed Charges (Times)
     For the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2010
  For the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2009
  For the Twelve Months
Ended December 31, 2009

Con Edison

  3.1   2.7   3.0

CECONY

  3.7   3.3   3.1

 

For each of the Companies, the common equity ratio at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was:

 

    

Common Equity Ratio

(Percent of total capitalization)

     March 31,
2010
  December 31,
2009

Con Edison

  50.7   50.5

CECONY

  50.5   50.3

Contractual Obligations

At March 31, 2010, there were no material changes in the Companies’ aggregate obligation to make payments pursuant to contracts compared to those discussed under “Capital Requirements and Resources – Contractual Obligations” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K.

Electric Power Requirements

At March 31, 2010, there were no material changes in the Companies’ electric power requirements compared to those disclosed under “Electric Operations – Electric Supply” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K.

Regulatory Matters

At March 31, 2010, there were no material changes in the Companies’ regulatory matters compared to those disclosed under “Utility Regulation” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K and “Rate Agreements” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K, other than as described in Note B to the First Quarter Financial Statements.

Financial and Commodity Market Risks

The Companies are subject to various risks and uncertainties associated with financial and commodity markets. The most significant market risks include interest rate risk, commodity price risk, credit risk and investment risk. At March 31, 2010, there were no material changes in the Companies’ financial and commodity market risks compared to those discussed under “Financial and Commodity Market Risks” in Item 7 of the Form 10-K, other than as described below and in Note J to the First Quarter Financial Statements.

Commodity Price Risk

Con Edison’s commodity price risk relates primarily to the purchase and sale of electricity, gas and related derivative instruments. The Utilities and Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses have risk management strategies to mitigate their related exposures. See Note J to the First Quarter Financial Statements.

Con Edison estimates that, as of March 31, 2010, a 10 percent decline in market prices would result in a decline in fair value of $98 million for the derivative instruments used by the Utilities to hedge purchases of electricity and gas, of which $77 million is for CECONY and $21 million is for O&R. Con Edison expects that any such change in fair value would be largely offset by directionally opposite changes in the cost of the electricity and gas purchased. In accordance with provisions approved by state regulators, the Utilities generally recover from customers the costs they incur for energy purchased for their customers, including gains and losses on certain derivative instruments used to hedge energy purchased and related costs. See “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses use a value-at-risk (VaR) model to assess the market risk of their electricity and gas commodity fixed-price purchase and sales commitments, physical forward contracts and commodity derivative instruments. VaR represents the potential change in fair value of instruments or the portfolio due to changes in market

40     


Table of Contents

factors, for a specified time period and confidence level. These businesses estimate VaR across their electricity and natural gas commodity businesses using a delta-normal variance/covariance model with a 95 percent confidence level. Since the VaR calculation involves complex methodologies and estimates and assumptions that are based on past experience, it is not necessarily indicative of future results. VaR for transactions associated with hedges on commodity contracts, assuming a one-day holding period, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009, was as follows:

 

     2010   2009
    (Millions of Dollars)

95% Confidence Level, One-Day Holding Period

 

Average for the period

  $ 1   $ 1

High

    1     2

Low

       

Credit Risk

The Companies are exposed to credit risk related to transactions entered into primarily for the various energy supply and hedging activities by the Utilities and the competitive energy businesses. Credit risk relates to the loss that may result from a counterparty’s nonperformance. The Companies use credit policies to manage this risk, including an established credit approval process, monitoring of counterparty limits, netting provisions within agreements and collateral or prepayment arrangements, credit insurance and credit default swaps. The Companies measure credit risk exposure as the replacement cost for open energy commodity and derivative positions plus amounts owed from counterparties for settled transactions. The replacement cost of open positions represents unrealized gains, net of any unrealized losses where the Companies have a legally enforceable right of setoff. See “Credit Exposure” in Note J to the First Quarter Financial Statements.

Environmental Matters

For information concerning climate change, environmental sustainability, potential liabilities arising from laws and regulations protecting the environment and other environmental matters, see “Environmental Matters” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K and Notes G and H to the First Quarter Financial Statements.

Impact of Inflation

The Companies are affected by the decline in the purchasing power of the dollar caused by inflation. Regulation permits the Utilities to recover through depreciation only the historical cost of their plant assets even though in an inflationary economy the cost to replace the assets upon their retirement will substantially exceed historical costs. The impact is, however, partially offset by the repayment of the Companies’ long-term debt in dollars of lesser value than the dollars originally borrowed.

Material Contingencies

For information concerning potential liabilities arising from the Companies’ material contingencies, see “Application of Critical Accounting Policies – Accounting for Contingencies,” in Item 7 of the Form 10-K and Notes B, G and H to the First Quarter Financial Statements.

Results of Operations

Results of operations reflect, among other things, the Companies’ accounting policies (see “Application of Critical Accounting Policies” in Item 7 of the Form 10-K) and rate plans that cover the rates the Utilities can charge their customers (see “Utility Regulation” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K). Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms currently applicable to the Utilities’ electric and gas businesses in New York, revenues will generally not be affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Revenues for CECONY’s

steam business and O&R’s other utility businesses are affected by changes in delivery volumes resulting from weather, economic conditions and other factors. See Note B to the First Quarter Financial Statements.

The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared with the 2009 period, reflect changes in the Utilities’ rate plans. These rate plans include an increase in the allowed electric return on common equity for CECONY. The rate plans provide for additional revenues to cover expected increases, discussed below, in certain operations and

    41


Table of Contents

maintenance expenses, depreciation and property taxes and interest charges. The results of operations include the operating results of the competitive energy businesses, including net mark-to-market effects.

The increases in operations and maintenance expenses reflect higher costs for pension and other post-retirement benefits, demand management programs and regulatory assessments in the 2010 period. Depreciation and property taxes were higher in the 2010 period reflecting primarily the impact from higher utility plant balances. Interest charges were higher in the 2010 period reflecting higher amounts of outstanding long-term debt. For additional information about major factors affecting earnings, see “Results of Operations – Summary,” above.

In general, the Utilities recover on a current basis the fuel, gas purchased for resale and purchased power costs they incur in supplying energy to their full-service customers (see “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A and “Regulatory Matters” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K). Accordingly, such costs do not generally affect the Companies’ results of operations. Management uses the term “net revenues” (operating revenues less such costs) to identify changes in operating revenues that may affect the Companies’ results of operations. Management believes that, although “net revenues” may not be a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the measure facilitates the analysis by management and investors of the Companies’ results of operations.

 

Con Edison’s principal business segments are CECONY’s regulated electric, gas and steam utility activities, O&R’s regulated electric and gas utility activities and Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses. CECONY’s principal business segments are its regulated electric, gas and steam utility activities. A discussion of the results of operations by principal business segment for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 follows. For additional business segment financial information, see Note I to the First Quarter Financial Statements.

42     


Table of Contents

Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared with Three Months Ended March 31, 2009

The Companies’ results of operations (which were discussed above under “Results of Operations – Summary”) in 2010 compared with 2009 were:

 

     CECONY     O&R     Competitive Energy
Businesses and Other**
    Con Edison*  
(Millions of Dollars)   Increases
(Decreases)
Amount
    Increases
(Decreases)
Percent
    Increases
(Decreases)
Amount
    Increases
(Decreases)
Percent
    Increases
(Decreases)
Amount
    Increases
(Decreases)
Percent
    Increases
(Decreases)
Amount
    Increases
(Decreases)
Percent
 

Operating revenues

  $ (52   (1.9 )%    $ (1   (0.4 )%    $ 92      22.9   $ 39      1.1

Purchased power

    (96   (14.8     8      10.3        92      22.3        4      0.4   

Fuel

    (85   (36.2     N/A      N/A                    (85   (36.2

Gas purchased for resale

    (134   (31.3     (21   (32.3                 (155   (31.1

Operating revenues less purchased power, fuel and gas purchased for resale (net revenues)

    263      18.0        12      11.0                    275      17.7   

Other operations and maintenance

    107      21.4        11      19.0        3      13.6        121      20.8   

Depreciation and amortization

    10      5.5        1      10.0        1      Large        12      6.3   

Taxes, other than income taxes

    67      19.5        1      8.3        1      33.3        69      19.2   

Operating income

    79      18.2        (1   (3.5     (5   (11.6     73      17.4   

Other income less deductions

    4      Large                    2      Large        6      Large   

Net interest expense

    8      6.3        (1   (11.1     (2   (28.6     5      3.5   

Income from continuing operations, before taxes

    75      24.5                    (1   (2.0     74      26.7   

Income tax expenses

    29      27.4        (1   (12.5                 28      29.8   

Net income for common stock

  $ 46      23.4   $ 1      8.3   $ (1   (3.4 )%    $ 46      25.6

 

* Represents the consolidated financial results of Con Edison and its businesses.
** Includes inter-company and parent company accounting.

CECONY

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010
       Three Months Ended
March 31, 2009
      

2010-2009
Variation

 
(Millions of Dollars)   Electric   Gas   Steam  

2010

Total

  Electric   Gas   Steam   2009
Total
 

Operating revenues

  $ 1,728   $ 683   $ 307   $ 2,718   $ 1,658   $ 781   $ 331   $ 2,770   $ (52

Purchased power

    529         23     552     628         20     648     (96

Fuel

    60         90     150     95         140     235     (85

Gas purchased for resale

        294         294         428         428     (134

Net revenues

    1,139     389     194     1,722     935     353     171     1,459     263   

Operations and maintenance

    468     88     52     608     394     67     40     501     107   

Depreciation and amortization

    151     25     15     191     142     24     15     181     10   

Taxes, other than income taxes

    325     61     25     411     261     58     25     344     67   

Operating income

  $ 195   $ 215   $ 102   $ 512   $ 138   $ 204   $ 91   $ 433   $ 79   
    43


Table of Contents

Electric

CECONY’s results of electric operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period is as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended   Variation  
(Millions of Dollars)   March 31,
2010
  March 31,
2009
 

Operating revenues

  $ 1,728   $ 1,658   $ 70   

Purchased power

    529     628     (99

Fuel

    60     95     (35

Net revenues

    1,139     935     204   

Operations and maintenance

    468     394     74   

Depreciation and amortization

    151     142     9   

Taxes, other than income taxes

    325     261     64   

Electric operating income

  $ 195   $ 138   $ 57   

CECONY’s electric sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period were:

 

     Millions of kWhs Delivered     Revenues in Millions  
     Three Months Ended                 Three Months Ended                
Description   March 31,
2010
  March 31,
2009
  Variation     Percent
Variation
    March 31,
2010
    March 31,
2009
    Variation     Percent
Variation
 

Residential/Religious*

  2,671   2,720   (49   (1.8 )%    $ 633      $ 605      $ 28      4.6

Commercial/Industrial

  2,994   3,218   (224   (7.0     554        596        (42   (7.0

Retail access customers

  5,385   5,284   101      1.9        468        375        93      24.8   

NYPA, Municipal Agency and other sales

  2,898   2,954   (56   (1.9     120        94        26      27.7   

Other operating revenues

                  (47     (12     (35   Large   

Total

  13,948   14,176   (228   (1.6 )%    $ 1,728      $ 1,658      $ 70      4.2

 

* “Residential/Religious” generally includes single-family dwellings, individual apartments in multi-family dwellings, religious organizations and certain other not-for-profit organizations.

 

CECONY’s electric operating revenues increased $70 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period due primarily to CECONY’s electric rate plans ($180 million, which among other things, reflected a 10.0 percent return on common equity, effective April 2009, as compared with the 9.1 percent return previously reflected in rates) and an accrual for the revenue decoupling mechanism ($12 million), offset in part by lower purchased power ($99 million) and fuel costs ($35 million). CECONY’s revenues from electric sales are subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which delivery revenues generally are not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Other electric operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the revenue decoupling mechanism and other provisions of the company’s rate plans.

Electric delivery volumes in CECONY’s service area decreased 1.6 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period. After adjusting for variations, principally weather and billing days, electric delivery volumes in CECONY’s service area decreased 0.4 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period, reflecting the impact of lower average normalized use per customer.

CECONY’s electric purchased power costs decreased $99 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period due to a decrease in unit costs ($54 million) and purchased volumes ($45 million). Electric fuel costs decreased $35 million for

44     


Table of Contents

the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period due to lower unit costs ($38 million), offset by higher send out volumes from the company’s generating facilities ($3 million).

CECONY’s electric operating income increased $57 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period. The increase reflects primarily higher net revenues ($204 million, due primarily to the electric rate plan, including the collection of a surcharge for a New York State assessment and the recovery of higher pension expense), offset by higher operations and maintenance costs ($74 million, due primarily to the surcharge for a New York State assessment ($40 million), and higher pension expense ($30 million) ), taxes other than income taxes ($64 million, principally property taxes) and depreciation ($9 million). The increased operating expenses in the first quarter of 2010 resulting from two severe winter storms were deferred as a regulatory asset, and did not affect electric operating income. See “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities” in Note B to the First Quarter Financial Statements.

Gas

CECONY’s results of gas operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period is as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended       
(Millions of Dollars)   March 31,
2010
  March 31,
2009
  Variation  

Operating revenues

  $ 683   $ 781   $ (98

Gas purchased for resale

    294     428     (134

Net revenues

    389     353     36   

Operations and maintenance

    88     67     21   

Depreciation and amortization

    25     24     1   

Taxes, other than income taxes

    61     58     3   

Gas operating income

  $ 215   $ 204   $ 11   

 

CECONY’s gas sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period were:

 

     Thousands of dths Delivered     Revenues in Millions  
     Three Months Ended                 Three Months Ended              
Description   March 31,
2010
  March 31,
2009
  Variation     Percent
Variation
    March 31,
2010
    March 31,
2009
  Variation     Percent
Variation
 

Residential

  19,345   20,293   (948   (4.7 )%    $ 346      $ 395   $ (49   (12.4 )% 

General

  11,482   12,757   (1,275   (10.0     163        203     (40   (19.7

Firm transportation

  22,941   20,279   2,662      13.1        148        101     47      46.5   

Total firm sales and transportation

  53,768   53,329   439      0.8        657        699     (42   (6.0

Interruptible sales

  3,167   3,219   (52   (1.6     30        44     (14   (31.8

NYPA

  6,042   7,738   (1,696   (21.9     1        1            

Generation plants

  12,265   13,228   (963   (7.3     8        9     (1   (11.1

Other

  7,814   5,674   2,140      37.7        22        13     9      69.2   

Other operating revenues

                  (35     15     (50   Large   

Total

  83,056   83,188   (132   (0.2 )%    $ 683      $ 781   $ (98   (12.5 )% 

 

CECONY’s gas operating revenues decreased $98 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period due primarily to a decrease in gas purchased for resale costs ($134 million), offset in part by the 2009 gas rate plan ($27 million). CECONY’s revenues from gas sales are subject to a weather normalization clause and a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which, delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Other gas operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the company’s rate plans.

CECONY’s sales and transportation volumes for firm customers increased 0.8 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period. After adjusting for variations, principally weather and billing days, firm gas sales and transportation volumes in the company’s service area increased 4.4 percent in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the 2009 period,

    45


Table of Contents

reflecting primarily new business and transfers of interruptible customers to firm service.

CECONY’s purchased gas cost decreased by $134 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period due to lower unit costs ($123 million) and lower send out volumes ($11 million).

CECONY’s gas operating income increased $11 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period. The increase reflects primarily higher net revenues ($36 million), offset by higher operations and maintenance expense ($21 million, due primarily to a surcharge for a New York State assessment ($20 million)), and taxes other than income taxes ($3 million).

 

Steam

CECONY’s results of steam operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period is as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended       
(Millions of Dollars)   March 31,
2010
  March 31,
2009
  Variation  

Operating revenues

  $ 307   $ 331   $ (24

Purchased power

    23     20     3   

Fuel

    90     140     (50

Net revenues

    194     171     23   

Operations and maintenance

    52     40     12   

Depreciation and amortization

    15     15       

Taxes, other than income taxes

    25     25       

Steam operating income

  $ 102   $ 91   $ 11   

 

CECONY’s steam sales and deliveries for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period were:

 

     Millions of Pounds Delivered     Revenues in Millions  
     Three Months Ended          Three Months Ended       
Description   March 31,
2010
  March 31,
2009
  Variation     Percent
Variation
    March 31,
2010
    March 31,
2009
  Variation     Percent
Variation
 

General

  61   348   (287   (82.5 )%    $ 10      $ 14   $ (4   (28.6 )% 

Apartment house

  2,631   2,773   (142   (5.1     80        88     (8   (9.1

Annual power

  6,523   6,584   (61   (0.9     218        224     (6   (2.7

Other operating revenues

                  (1     5     (6   Large   

Total

  9,215   9,705   (490   (5.0 )%    $ 307      $ 331   $ (24   (7.3 )% 

 

CECONY’s steam operating revenues decreased $24 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period due primarily to lower fuel costs ($50 million), offset in part by the steam rate plan ($23 million). Other steam operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the company’s rate plans.

Steam sales and delivery volumes decreased 5.0 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period. After adjusting for variations, principally weather and billing days, steam sales and deliveries increased 0.1 percent in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the 2009 period.

CECONY’s steam purchased power costs increased $3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period due to an increase in unit costs ($1 million), and in purchased volumes ($2 million). Steam fuel costs decreased $50 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period due to lower sendout volumes ($9 million) and unit costs ($41 million).

Steam operating income increased $11 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period. The increase reflects primarily higher net revenues ($23 million), offset by higher operations and maintenance expense ($12 million, due primarily to a surcharge for a New York State assessment ($5 million) and higher administrative and general expenses ($4 million)).

46     


Table of Contents

O&R

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010
 

Three Months Ended

March 31, 2009

      
(Millions of Dollars)   Electric   Gas   2010
Total
  Electric   Gas   2009
Total
  2010-2009
Variation
 

Operating revenues

  $ 161   $ 90   $ 251   $ 146   $ 106   $ 252   $ (1

Purchased power

    86         86     78         78     8   

Gas purchased for resale

        44     44         65     65     (21

Net revenues

    75     46     121     68     41     109     12   

Operations and maintenance

    53     16     69     45     13     58     11   

Depreciation and amortization

    8     3     11     7     3     10     1   

Taxes, other than income taxes

    9     4     13     9     3     12     1   

Operating income

  $ 5   $ 23   $ 28   $ 7   $ 22   $ 29   $ (1

Electric

O&R’s results of electric operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period is as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended       
(Millions of Dollars)   March 31,
2010
  March 31,
2009
  Variation  

Operating revenues

  $ 161   $ 146   $ 15   

Purchased power

    86     78     8   

Net revenues

    75     68     7   

Operations and maintenance

    53     45     8   

Depreciation and amortization

    8     7     1   

Taxes, other than income taxes

    9     9     -   

Electric operating income

  $ 5   $ 7   $ (2

O&R’s electric sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period were:

 

     Millions of kWhs Delivered     Revenues in Millions  
     Three Months Ended                 Three Months Ended              
Description   March 31,
2010
  March 31,
2009
  Variation     Percent
Variation
    March 31,
2010
    March 31,
2009
  Variation     Percent
Variation
 

Residential/Religious*

  448   452   (4   (0.9 )%    $ 80      $ 66   $ 14      21.2

Commercial/Industrial

  382   483   (101   (20.9     54        57     (3   (5.3

Retail access customers

  507   434   73      16.9        26        19     7      36.8   

Public authorities

  27   27               3        3            

Other operating revenues

                  (2     1     (3   Large   

Total

  1,364   1,396   (32   (2.3 )%    $ 161      $ 146   $ 15      10.3

 

* “Residential/Religious” generally includes single-family dwellings, individual apartments in multi-family dwellings, religious organizations and certain other not-for-profit organizations.

 

O&R’s electric operating revenues increased $15 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period due primarily to increased recoverable purchased power costs ($8 million). O&R’s New York electric delivery revenues are subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which, delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. O&R’s electric sales in New Jersey and Pennsylvania are not part of a decoupling mechanism, and as a result, they do impact revenues. Other electric operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the company’s electric rate plan.

    47


Table of Contents

Electric delivery volumes in O&R’s service area decreased 2.3 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period. After adjusting for weather variations, electric delivery volumes in O&R’s service area decreased 0.7 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period, reflecting the impact of lower average normalized use per customer.

Electric operating income decreased $2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period. The decrease reflects primarily higher operations and maintenance expense ($8 million, due primarily to higher demand management program expenses ($1 million), and a surcharge for a New York State assessment ($3 million)), and depreciation ($1 million), offset by higher net revenues ($7 million). The increased operating expenses in the first quarter of 2010 resulting from two severe winter storms were deferred as a regulatory asset, and did not affect electric operating income. See “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities” in Note B to the First Quarter Financial Statements.

Gas

O&R’s results of gas operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period is as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended       
(Millions of Dollars)   March 31,
2010
  March 31,
2009
  Variation  

Operating revenues

  $ 90   $ 106   $ (16

Gas purchased for resale

    44     65     (21

Net revenues

    46     41     5   

Operations and maintenance

    16     13     3   

Depreciation and amortization

    3     3       

Taxes, other than income taxes

    4     3     1   

Gas operating income

  $ 23   $ 22   $ 1   

 

O&R’s gas sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period were:

 

     Thousands of dths Delivered     Revenues in Millions  
     Three Months Ended                 Three Months Ended              
Description   March 31,
2010
  March 31,
2009
  Variation     Percent
Variation
    March 31,
2010
  March 31,
2009
  Variation     Percent
Variation
 

Residential

  3,525   3,912   (387   (9.9 )%    $ 50   $ 66   $ (16   (24.2 )% 

General

  710   868   (158   (18.2     9     14     (5   (35.7

Firm transportation

  4,678   4,951   (273   (5.5     25     19     6      31.6   

Total firm sales and transportation

  8,913   9,731   (818   (8.4     84     99     (15   (15.2

Interruptible sales

  1,411   1,391   20      1.4        6     6            

Generation plants

  140   38   102      Large                       

Other

  369   467   (98   (21.0                    

Other gas revenues

                      1     (1   Large   

Total

  10,833   11,627   (794   (6.8 )%    $ 90   $ 106   $ (16   (15.1 )% 

 

O&R’s gas operating revenues decreased $16 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period due primarily to the decrease in gas purchased for resale in 2010 ($21 million). O&R’s New York gas delivery revenues are subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which, delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved.

Sales and transportation volumes for firm customers decreased 8.4 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period. After adjusting for weather and other variations, total firm sales and transportation volumes were the same in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period. O&R’s New York revenues from gas sales are subject to a weather normalization clause that moderates, but does not eliminate, the effect of weather-related changes on net income.

48     


Table of Contents

Gas operating income increased $1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with

the 2009 period. The increase reflects primarily higher net revenues ($5 million), offset by higher operations and maintenance costs ($3 million), and taxes other than income taxes ($1 million).

Competitive Energy Businesses

The competitive energy businesses’ earnings decreased $3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period due primarily to higher mark-to-market losses in the 2010 period versus the 2009 period.

Operating revenues increased $88 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period, due primarily to increased mark-to-market activity and electric retail revenues. Electric wholesale revenues decreased $62 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the 2009 period, due to lower sales volumes ($61 million) and unit prices ($1 million). Electric retail revenues increased $49 million, due to higher sales volume ($78 million), offset by lower per unit prices ($29 million). Electric retail revenues increased 17 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the 2009 period, due to higher sales volumes, while gross margins increased significantly due primarily to the sale of higher margin contracts, lower costs and higher volumes. Net mark-to-market losses increased $7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the 2009 period due primarily to lower prices on electric and natural gas contracts, of which $104 million in gains are reflected in revenues and $111 million in losses are reflected in purchased power costs. Other revenues decreased $3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the 2009 period due primarily to lower sales of energy efficiency services.

Operating expenses increased $93 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the 2009 period, due primarily to increased purchased power cost ($90 million), gas purchased for resale ($1 million) and higher operations and maintenance costs ($2 million).

    49


Table of Contents

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

For information about the Companies’ primary market risks associated with activities in derivative financial instruments, other financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments, see “Financial and Commodity Market Risks,” in Part 1, Item 2 of this report, which information is incorporated herein by reference. Also, see Item 7A of the Form 10-K.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

The Companies maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that they submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. For each of the Companies, its management, with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report and, based on such evaluation, has concluded that the controls and procedures are effective to provide such reasonable assurance. Reasonable assurance is not absolute assurance, however, and there can be no assurance that any design of controls or procedures would be effective under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

There was no change in the Companies’ internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companies’ most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companies’ internal control over financial reporting.

Item 4T: Controls and Procedures

The information required for CECONY pursuant to this Item 4T has been included in Item 4 (which information is incorporated herein by reference).

50     


Table of Contents

Part II Other Information

Item 1: Legal Proceedings

CECONY

Superfund

In March 2010, the EPA added the Gowanus Canal to its National Priorities List of Superfund sites. For additional information, see “Environmental Matters – CECONY – Superfund” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K and Note G to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report (which information is incorporated herein by reference).

Permit Non-Compliance and Pollution Discharges

In March 2010, the DEC issued a revised proposed consent order with respect to CECONY’s steam generating facilities. In April 2010, CECONY entered into a consent order in connection with discharges at a property the company owns in the Astoria section of New York City. For additional information, see “Permit Non-Compliance and Pollution Discharges” in Note H to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note H to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report (which information is incorporated herein by reference).

Item 1A: Risk Factors

There were no material changes in the Companies’ risk factors compared to those disclosed in Item 1A of the Form 10-K.

    51


Table of Contents
  

Item 6: Exhibits

CON EDISON

 

Exhibit 12.1    Statement of computation of Con Edison's ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the 12-month period ended December 31, 2009.
Exhibit 31.1.1    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications – Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 31.1.2    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications – Chief Financial Officer.
Exhibit 32.1.1    Section 1350 Certifications – Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 32.1.2    Section 1350 Certifications – Chief Financial Officer.
Exhibit 101.INS    XBRL Instance Document.
Exhibit 101.SCH    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
Exhibit 101.CAL    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.DEF    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.LAB    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.PRE    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

CECONY

 

Exhibit 12.2    Statement of computation of CECONY's ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the 12-month period ended December 31, 2009.
Exhibit 31.2.1    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications – Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 31.2.2    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications – Chief Financial Officer.
Exhibit 32.2.1    Section 1350 Certifications – Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 32.2.2    Section 1350 Certifications – Chief Financial Officer.
Exhibit 101.INS    XBRL Instance Document.
Exhibit 101.SCH    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
Exhibit 101.CAL    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.DEF    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.LAB    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.PRE    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
52     


Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

    Consolidated Edison, Inc.
    Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
DATE: May 6, 2010     By    /S/    ROBERT HOGLUND
     

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President, Chief

Financial Officer and Duly

Authorized Officer

    53