As filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on July 30, 2014
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
¨ | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended: March 31, 2014
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
¨ | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Date of event requiring this shell company report:
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-29304
Ryanair Holdings plc
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ryanair Holdings plc
(Translation of registrants name into English)
Republic of Ireland
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
c/o Ryanair Limited
Corporate Head Office
Airside Business Park, Swords
County Dublin, Ireland
(Address of principal executive offices)
Please see Item 4. Information on the Company herein.
(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of company contact person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered | |
American Depositary Shares, each representing five Ordinary Shares |
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC | |
Ordinary Shares, par value 0.635 euro cent per share |
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (not for trading but only in connection with the registration of the American Depositary Shares) |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
1,383,237,668 Ordinary Shares
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No x
Note Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ¨ |
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board x |
Other ¨ |
If Other has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement Item the registrant has elected to follow Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ¨ No ¨
Page | ||||||
iii | ||||||
iv | ||||||
PART I | ||||||
Item 1. |
1 | |||||
Item 2. |
1 | |||||
Item 3. |
1 | |||||
1 | ||||||
2 | ||||||
4 | ||||||
6 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
Item 4. |
23 | |||||
23 | ||||||
23 | ||||||
27 | ||||||
28 | ||||||
28 | ||||||
29 | ||||||
30 | ||||||
31 | ||||||
32 | ||||||
33 | ||||||
35 | ||||||
35 | ||||||
37 | ||||||
38 | ||||||
39 | ||||||
45 | ||||||
Item 4A. |
45 | |||||
Item 5. |
45 | |||||
45 | ||||||
45 | ||||||
49 | ||||||
49 | ||||||
51 | ||||||
51 | ||||||
54 | ||||||
57 | ||||||
57 | ||||||
57 | ||||||
62 | ||||||
63 | ||||||
63 | ||||||
Item 6. |
63 | |||||
63 | ||||||
68 | ||||||
69 | ||||||
70 | ||||||
Item 7. |
71 | |||||
71 | ||||||
72 |
i
Item 8. |
72 | |||||
72 | ||||||
72 | ||||||
79 | ||||||
Item 9. |
79 | |||||
79 | ||||||
Item 10. |
83 | |||||
83 | ||||||
Options to Purchase Securities from Registrant or Subsidiaries |
83 | |||||
84 | ||||||
85 | ||||||
85 | ||||||
86 | ||||||
88 | ||||||
92 | ||||||
Item 11. |
93 | |||||
93 | ||||||
93 | ||||||
95 | ||||||
96 | ||||||
Item 12. |
97 | |||||
PART II | ||||||
Item 13. |
98 | |||||
Item 14. |
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |
98 | ||||
Item 15. |
98 | |||||
98 | ||||||
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
98 | |||||
99 | ||||||
100 | ||||||
Item 16. |
100 | |||||
Item 16A. |
100 | |||||
Item 16B. |
100 | |||||
Item 16C. |
100 | |||||
Item 16D. |
101 | |||||
Item 16E. |
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers |
101 | ||||
Item 16F. |
101 | |||||
Item 16G. |
102 | |||||
Item 16H. |
102 | |||||
PART III | ||||||
Item 17. |
102 | |||||
Item 18. |
102 | |||||
Item 19. |
103 |
ii
Presentation of Financial and Certain Other Information
As used herein, the term Ryanair Holdings refers to Ryanair Holdings plc. The term the Company refers to Ryanair Holdings or Ryanair Holdings together with its consolidated subsidiaries, as the context requires. The term Ryanair refers to Ryanair Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ryanair Holdings, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise. The term fiscal year refers to the 12-month period ended on March 31 of the quoted year. The term Ordinary Shares refers to the outstanding par value 0.635 euro cent per share common stock of the Company. All references to Ireland herein are references to the Republic of Ireland. All references to the U.K. herein are references to the United Kingdom and all references to the United States or U.S. herein are references to the United States of America. References to U.S. dollars, dollars, $ or U.S. cents are to the currency of the United States, references to U.K. pound sterling, U.K. £ and £ are to the currency of the U.K. and references to , euro, euros and euro cent are to the euro, the common currency of eighteen member states of the European Union (the EU), including Ireland. Various amounts and percentages set out in this annual report on Form 20-F have been rounded and accordingly may not total.
The Company owns or otherwise has rights to the trademark Ryanair® in certain jurisdictions. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyTrademarks. This report also makes reference to trade names and trademarks of companies other than the Company.
The Company publishes its annual and interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Additionally, in accordance with its legal obligation to comply with the International Accounting Standards Regulation (EC 1606 (2002)), which applies throughout the EU, the consolidated financial statements of the Company must comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU. Accordingly, the Companys consolidated financial statements and the selected financial data included herein comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the IASB and also International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU, in each case as in effect for the year ended and as of March 31, 2014 (collectively referred to as IFRS throughout).
The Company publishes its consolidated financial statements in euro. Solely for the convenience of the reader, this report contains translations of certain euro amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates. These translations should not be construed as representations that the converted amounts actually represent such U.S. dollar amounts or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the rates indicated or at any other rate. Unless otherwise indicated, such U.S. dollar amounts have been translated from euro at a rate of 1.00 = $1.3777, or $1.00 = 0.7258, the official rate published by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board in its weekly H.10 release (the Federal Reserve Rate) on March 31, 2014. The Federal Reserve Rate for euro on July 18, 2014 was 1.00 = $1.3524 or $1.00 = 0.7394. See Item 3. Key InformationExchange Rates for information regarding historical rates of exchange relevant to the Company, and Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects and Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for a discussion of the effects of changes in exchange rates on the Company.
iii
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Except for the historical statements and discussions contained herein, statements contained in this report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements may include words such as expect, estimate, project, anticipate, should, intend, and similar expressions or variations on such expressions. Any filing made by the Company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) may include forward-looking statements. In addition, other written or oral statements which constitute forward-looking statements have been made and may in the future be made by or on behalf of the Company, including statements concerning its future operating and financial performance, the Companys share of new and existing markets, general industry and economic trends and the Companys performance relative thereto and the Companys expectations as to requirements for capital expenditures and regulatory matters. The Companys business is to provide a low-fares airline service in Europe, and its outlook is predominately based on its interpretation of what it considers to be the key economic factors affecting that business and the European economy. Forward-looking statements with regard to the Companys business rely on a number of assumptions concerning future events and are subject to a number of uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the Companys control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. It is not reasonably possible to itemize all of the many factors and specific events that could affect the outlook and results of an airline operating in the European economy. Among the factors that are subject to change and could significantly impact Ryanairs expected results are the airline pricing environment, fuel costs, competition from new and existing carriers, market prices for replacement aircraft and aircraft maintenance services, aircraft availability, costs associated with environmental, safety and security measures, terrorist attacks, actions of the Irish, U.K., EU and other governments and their respective regulatory agencies, fluctuations in currency exchange rates and interest rates, changes to the structure of the euro, airport handling and access charges, litigation, labor relations, the economic environment of the airline industry, the general economic environment in Ireland, the U.K. and elsewhere in Europe, the general willingness of passengers to travel, flight interruptions caused by volcanic ash emissions or other atmospheric disruptions, factors affecting the value of Ryanairs investment in Aer Lingus Group plc and other factors discussed herein. The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
iv
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Ryanair operates an ultra-low cost, scheduled airline serving short-haul, point-to-point routes largely in Europe from its 69 bases in airports across Europe, which together are referred to as Ryanairs bases of operations or Ryanairs bases. For a list of these bases, see Item 4. Information on the CompanyRoute System, Scheduling and Fares. Ryanair pioneered the low-fares operating model in Europe in the early 1990s. As of June 30, 2014, the Company offered over 1,600 scheduled short-haul flights per day serving approximately 186 airports largely throughout Europe, with a principal fleet of 297 Boeing 737-800 aircraft and 5 additional leased aircraft acquired on short term leases for the summer of 2014 to provide extra capacity flying approximately 1,600 routes. The Company also holds a 29.8% interest in Aer Lingus Group plc (Aer Lingus), which it has acquired through market purchases following Aer Lingus partial privatization in 2006. Ryanairs attempts to acquire the entire share capital of Aer Lingus have been blocked by the European authorities, with the latest ruling currently under appeal by Ryanair. For additional information, see Item 8. Financial InformationOther Financial InformationLegal ProceedingsMatters Related to Investment in Aer Lingus. A detailed description of the Companys business can be found in Item 4. Information on the Company.
1
The following tables set forth certain of the Companys selected consolidated financial information as of and for the periods indicated, financial information presented in euro in the table below has been derived from the consolidated financial statements that are prepared in accordance with IFRS. The financial information for fiscal 2014 has been translated from euro to US$ using the Federal Reserve Rate on March 31, 2014. This information should be read in conjunction with: (i) the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and related notes thereto included in Item 18 and (ii) Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
Income Statement Data:
Fiscal year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014(a) | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per-Ordinary Share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
$ | 6,939.1 | | 5,036.7 | | 4,884.0 | | 4,390.2 | | 3,629.5 | | 2,988.1 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | (6,031.7 | ) | | (4,378.1 | ) | | (4,165.8 | ) | | (3,707.0 | ) | | (3,141.3 | ) | | (2,586.0 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 907.4 | | 658.6 | | 718.2 | | 683.2 | | 488.2 | | 402.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net interest (expense) |
$ | (91.9 | ) | | (66.7 | ) | | (71.9 | ) | | (64.9 | ) | | (66.7 | ) | | (48.6 | ) | ||||||
Other non-operating (expense) income |
$ | (0.7 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | 4.6 | | 14.7 | | (0.6 | ) | | (12.5 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Profit before taxation |
$ | 814.8 | | 591.4 | | 650.9 | | 633.0 | | 420.9 | | 341.0 | ||||||||||||
Tax expense on profit on ordinary activities |
$ | (94.5 | ) | | (68.6 | ) | | (81.6 | ) | | (72.6 | ) | | (46.3 | ) | | (35.7 | ) | ||||||
Profit after taxation |
$ | 720.3 | | 522.8 | | 569.3 | | 560.4 | | 374.6 | | 305.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Ryanair Holdings basic earnings per Ordinary Share (U.S. cents)/(euro cent) |
$ | 50.92 | | 36.96 | | 39.45 | | 38.03 | | 25.21 | | 20.68 | ||||||||||||
Ryanair Holdings diluted earnings per Ordinary Share (U.S. cents)/(euro cent) |
$ | 50.78 | | 36.86 | | 39.33 | | 37.94 | | 25.14 | | 20.60 | ||||||||||||
Ryanair Holdings dividend paid per Ordinary Share (U.S. cents)/(euro cent) |
n/a | n/a | | 34.00 | n/a | | 33.57 | n/a |
Balance Sheet Data:
As of March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014(a) | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2,383.6 | | 1,730.1 | | 1,240.9 | | 2,708.3 | | 2,028.3 | | 1,477.9 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 12,140.4 | | 8,812.1 | | 8,943.0 | | 9,001.0 | | 8,596.0 | | 7,563.4 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt, including capital lease obligations |
$ | 4,248.3 | | 3,083.6 | | 3,498.3 | | 3,625.2 | | 3,649.4 | | 2,956.2 | ||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
$ | 4,526.8 | | 3,285.8 | | 3,272.6 | | 3,306.7 | | 2,953.9 | | 2,848.6 | ||||||||||||
Issued share capital |
$ | 12.1 | | 8.8 | | 9.2 | | 9.3 | | 9.5 | | 9.4 | ||||||||||||
Weighted Average Number of Ordinary Shares |
1,414.6 | 1,414.6 | 1,443.1 | 1,473.7 | 1,485.7 | 1,476.4 |
2
Cash Flow Statement Data:
Fiscal year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014(a) | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash inflow from operating activities |
$ | 1,439.1 | | 1,044.6 | | 1,023.5 | | 1,020.3 | | 786.3 | | 871.5 | ||||||||||||
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities |
$ | 414.3 | | 300.7 | | (1,821.5 | ) | | (185.4 | ) | | (474.0 | ) | | (1,549.1 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities |
$ | (1,179.4 | ) | | (856.1 | ) | | (669.4 | ) | | (154.9 | ) | | 238.1 | | 572.3 | ||||||||
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 674.0 | | 489.2 | | (1,467.4 | ) | | 680.0 | | 550.4 | | (105.3 | ) |
(a) | Dollar amounts are initially measured in euro in accordance with IFRS and then translated to U.S. $ solely for convenience at the Federal Reserve Rate on March 31, 2014, of 1.00 = $1.3777 or $1.00 = 0.7258. |
3
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information concerning the exchange rate between: (i) the U.S. dollar and the euro; (ii) the U.K. pound sterling and the euro; and (iii) the U.K. pound sterling and the U.S. dollar. Such rates are provided solely for the convenience of the reader and are not necessarily the rates used by the Company in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements included in Item 18. No representation is made that any of such currencies could have been, or could be, converted into any other of such currencies at such rates or at any other rate.
U.S. dollars per 1.00(a)
Year ended December 31, |
End of Period |
Average (b) |
Low | High | ||||||||||||
2009 |
1.433 | 1.394 | | | ||||||||||||
2010 |
1.336 | 1.326 | | | ||||||||||||
2011 |
1.296 | 1.392 | | | ||||||||||||
2012 |
1.319 | 1.291 | | | ||||||||||||
2013 |
1.378 | 1.328 | | | ||||||||||||
Month ended |
||||||||||||||||
January 31, 2014 |
| | 1.350 | 1.368 | ||||||||||||
February 28, 2014 |
| | 1.351 | 1.381 | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2014 |
| | 1.373 | 1.393 | ||||||||||||
April 30, 2014 |
| | 1.370 | 1.390 | ||||||||||||
May 31, 2014 |
| | 1.360 | 1.392 | ||||||||||||
June 30, 2014 |
| | 1.353 | 1.369 | ||||||||||||
Period ended July 18, 2014 |
| | 1.352 | 1.367 |
U.K. pounds sterling per 1.00(c)
Year ended December 31, |
End of Period |
Average (b) |
Low | High | ||||||||||||
2009 |
0.887 | 0.891 | | | ||||||||||||
2010 |
0.857 | 0.858 | | | ||||||||||||
2011 |
0.836 | 0.868 | | | ||||||||||||
2012 |
0.811 | 0.811 | | | ||||||||||||
2013 |
0.830 | 0.849 | | | ||||||||||||
Month ended |
||||||||||||||||
January 31, 2014 |
| | 0.817 | 0.834 | ||||||||||||
February 28, 2014 |
| | 0.818 | 0.833 | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2014 |
| | 0.821 | 0.840 | ||||||||||||
April 30, 2014 |
| | 0.820 | 0.830 | ||||||||||||
May 31, 2014 |
| | 0.809 | 0.822 | ||||||||||||
June 30, 2014 |
| | 0.798 | 0.814 | ||||||||||||
Period ended July 18, 2014 |
| | 0.789 | 0.798 |
4
U.K. pounds sterling per U.S.$1.00(d)
Year ended December 31, |
End of Period |
Average (b) |
Low | High | ||||||||||||
2009 |
0.627 | 0.641 | | | ||||||||||||
2010 |
0.641 | 0.647 | | | ||||||||||||
2011 |
0.645 | 0.624 | | | ||||||||||||
2012 |
0.615 | 0.628 | | | ||||||||||||
2013 |
0.603 | 0.639 | | | ||||||||||||
Month ended |
||||||||||||||||
January 31, 2014 |
| | 0.602 | 0.612 | ||||||||||||
February 28, 2014 |
| | 0.597 | 0.613 | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2014 |
| | 0.597 | 0.606 | ||||||||||||
April 30, 2014 |
| | 0.592 | 0.603 | ||||||||||||
May 31, 2014 |
| | 0.589 | 0.598 | ||||||||||||
June 30, 2014 |
| | 0.584 | 0.598 | ||||||||||||
Period ended July 18, 2014 |
| | 0.582 | 0.585 |
(a) | Based on the Federal Reserve Rate for euro. |
(b) | The average of the relevant exchange rates on the last business day of each month during the relevant period. |
(c) | Based on the composite exchange rate as quoted at 5 p.m., New York time, by Bloomberg/Reuters. |
(d) | Based on the Federal Reserve Rate for U.K. pound sterling. |
As of July 18, 2014, the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the euro was 1.00 = $1.3524, or $1.00 = 0.7394; the exchange rate between the U.K. pound sterling and the euro was U.K. £1.00 = 1.2642, or 1.00 = U.K. £0.7910; and the exchange rate between the U.K. pound sterling and the U.S. dollar was U.K. £1.00 = $1.7086, or $1.00 = U.K. £0.5852. For a discussion of the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the Companys results of operations, see Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
5
SELECTED OPERATING AND OTHER DATA
The following tables set forth certain operating data of Ryanair for each of the fiscal years shown. Such data are derived from the Companys consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS and certain other data, and are not audited. For definitions of the terms used in this table, see the Glossary in Appendix A.
Fiscal Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Average Yield per Revenue Passenger Mile (RPM) () |
0.059 | 0.064 | 0.059 | 0.053 | 0.052 | |||||||||||||||
Average Yield per Available Seat Miles (ASM) () |
0.049 | 0.052 | 0.048 | 0.045 | 0.043 | |||||||||||||||
Average Fuel Cost per U.S. Gallon () |
2.453 | 2.381 | 2.075 | 1.756 | 1.515 | |||||||||||||||
Cost per ASM (CASM) () |
0.055 | 0.056 | 0.051 | 0.049 | 0.047 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Margin |
13 | % | 15 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | 13 | % | ||||||||||
Break-even Load Factor |
72 | % | 70 | % | 70 | % | 72 | % | 73 | % | ||||||||||
Average Booked Passenger Fare () |
46.40 | 48.20 | 45.36 | 39.24 | 34.95 | |||||||||||||||
Cost Per Booked Passenger () |
53.61 | 52.56 | 48.90 | 43.59 | 38.88 | |||||||||||||||
Ancillary Revenue per Booked Passenger () |
15.27 | 13.43 | 11.69 | 11.12 | 9.98 | |||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue Passengers Booked |
81,668,285 | 79,256,253 | 75,814,551 | 72,062,659 | 66,503,999 | |||||||||||||||
Revenue Passenger Miles |
64,470,425,471 | 59,865,600,628 | 58,584,451,085 | 53,256,894,035 | 44,841,072,500 | |||||||||||||||
Available Seat Miles |
77,916,511,414 | 72,829,956,243 | 71,139,686,423 | 63,358,255,401 | 53,469,635,740 | |||||||||||||||
Booked Passenger Load Factor |
83 | % | 82 | % | 82 | % | 83 | % | 82 | % | ||||||||||
Average Length of Passenger Haul (miles) |
788 | 754 | 771 | 727 | 661 | |||||||||||||||
Sectors Flown |
524,765 | 512,765 | 489,759 | 463,460 | 427,900 | |||||||||||||||
Number of Airports Served at Period End |
186 | 167 | 159 | 158 | 153 | |||||||||||||||
Average Daily Flight Hour Utilization (hours) |
8.81 | 8.24 | 8.47 | 8.36 | 8.89 | |||||||||||||||
Staff at Period End |
8,992 | 9,137 | 8,388 | 8,560 | 7,168 | |||||||||||||||
Staff per Aircraft at Period End |
30 | 30 | 30 | 31 | 31 | |||||||||||||||
Booked Passengers per Staff at Period End |
9,082 | 8,674 | 9,038 | 8,418 | 9,253 |
6
Risks Related to the Company
Changes in Fuel Costs and Fuel Availability Affect the Companys Results and Increase the Likelihood of Adverse Impact to the Companys Profitability. Jet fuel costs are subject to wide fluctuations as a result of many economic and political factors and events occurring throughout the world that Ryanair can neither control nor accurately predict, including increases in demand, sudden disruptions in supply and other concerns about global supply, as well as market speculation. Oil prices increased substantially in fiscal years 2012, 2013 and 2014 and remain at elevated levels. As international prices for jet fuel are denominated in U.S. dollars, Ryanairs fuel costs are also subject to certain exchange rate risks. Substantial price increases, adverse exchange rates, or the unavailability of adequate fuel supplies, including, without limitation, any such events resulting from international terrorism, prolonged hostilities in Ukraine or the Middle East or other oil-producing regions or the suspension of production by any significant producer, may adversely affect Ryanairs profitability. In the event of a fuel shortage resulting from a disruption of oil imports or otherwise, additional increases in fuel prices or a curtailment of scheduled services could result.
Ryanair has historically entered into arrangements providing for substantial protection against fluctuations in fuel prices, generally through forward contracts covering periods of up to 18 months of anticipated jet fuel requirements. As of July 25, 2014, Ryanair had entered into forward jet fuel (jet kerosene) contracts covering approximately 90% of its estimated requirements for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015 at prices equivalent to approximately $950 per metric ton. In addition, as of July 25, 2014, Ryanair had entered into forward jet fuel (jet kerosene) contracts covering approximately 55% of its estimated requirements for the first half of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016 at prices equivalent to approximately $950 per metric ton. Ryanair is exposed to risks arising from fluctuations in the price of fuel, and movements in the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate because of the limited nature of its hedging program, especially in light of the recent volatility in the relevant currency and commodity markets. Any further increase in fuel costs could have a material adverse effect on Ryanairs financial performance. In addition, any strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro could have an adverse effect on the cost of buying fuel in euro. As of July 25, 2014, Ryanair had hedged approximately 90% of its forecasted fuel-related dollar purchases against the euro at a rate of approximately $1.34 per euro for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015 and approximately 50% of its forecasted fuel related dollar purchases against the euro at a rate of approximately $1.37 per euro for the first 6 months of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016.
No assurances whatsoever can be given about trends in fuel prices, and average fuel prices for future years may be significantly higher than current prices. Management estimates that every $10 movement in the price of a metric ton of jet fuel will impact Ryanairs costs by approximately 2 million, taking into account Ryanairs hedging programme for the 2015 fiscal year. There can be no assurance, however, in this regard, and the impact of fuel prices on Ryanairs operating results may be more, or less, pronounced. There also cannot be any assurance that Ryanairs current or any future arrangements will be adequate to protect Ryanair from increases in the price of fuel or that Ryanair will not incur losses due to high fuel prices, either alone or in combination with other factors. Because of Ryanairs low fares and its no-fuel-surcharges policy, as well as Ryanairs expansion plans, which could have a negative impact on yields, its ability to pass on increased fuel costs to passengers through increased fares or otherwise is somewhat limited. Moreover, the anticipated expansion of Ryanairs fleet from September 2014 onwards will likely result in an increase, in absolute terms, in Ryanairs aggregate fuel costs.
Ryanair Has Decided to Seasonally Ground Aircraft. In recent years, in response to an operating environment characterized by high fuel prices, typically lower winter traffic and yields and higher airport charges and/or taxes, Ryanair has adopted a policy of grounding a certain portion of its fleet during the winter months (from November to March). In the winter of fiscal year 2014, Ryanair grounded approximately 70 aircraft and the Company intends to again ground approximately 50 aircraft in the coming winter. Ryanairs adoption of the policy of seasonally grounding aircraft presents some risks. While Ryanair seeks to implement its seasonal grounding policy in a way that will allow it to reduce losses by operating flights during periods of high oil prices to high cost airports at low winter yields, there can be no assurance that this strategy will be successful.
7
Additionally, Ryanairs growth has been largely dependent on increasing summer capacity, and decreasing winter capacity, which may affect the overall future growth of Ryanair. Further, while seasonal grounding does reduce Ryanairs variable operating costs, it does not avoid fixed costs such as aircraft ownership costs, and it also decreases Ryanairs potential to earn ancillary revenues. Decreasing the number and frequency of flights may also negatively affect Ryanairs labor relations, including its ability to attract flight personnel only interested in year round employment. Such risks could lead to negative effects on Ryanairs financial condition and/or results of operations.
Ryanair May Not Achieve All of the Expected Benefits of its Recent Strategic Initiatives. Ryanair is in the process of implementing a series of strategic initiatives that are expected to have a significant impact on its business. Among other things, these initiatives include scheduling more flights to primary airports, selling flights via corporate travel agents on global distribution systems (GDS), increasing marketing spending significantly, and adjusting the airlines yield management strategy with the goal of increasing load factors. Ryanair has also announced a series of customer-experience related initiatives, including a new, easier-to-navigate website with a fare finder facility, reduced penalty fees, more customer-friendly baggage allowances, 24 hour grace periods to correct minor booking errors and the introduction of allocated seating. For additional information on these initiatives, see Strategy. Although customer reaction to the measures has, so far, been positive and management expects these initiatives to be accretive to the Companys results over time, no assurance can be given that the financial impact of the initiatives will be positive, particularly in the short to medium term. In particular, certain of the strategic initiatives may have the effect of increasing certain of the Companys costs (including airport fees and marketing expenses), while reducing ancillary revenues previously earned from website sales and from various penalty fees and charges. Although the Company expects that revenues from allocated seating will offset the reduction in ancillary revenues, there can be no assurance that this will occur. Factors beyond Ryanairs control, including but not limited to customer acceptance, competitive reactions, market and economic conditions and other challenges described in this report could limit Ryanairs ability to achieve some or all of the expected benefits of these initiatives. A relatively minor shortfall from expected revenue levels (or increase in expected costs) could have a material adverse effect on the Companys growth or financial performance.
Currency Fluctuations Affect the Companys Results. Although the Company is headquartered in Ireland, a significant portion of its operations are conducted in the U.K. Consequently, the Company has significant operating revenues and operating expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, denominated in U.K. pounds sterling. In addition, fuel, aircraft, insurance, and some maintenance obligations are denominated in U.S. dollars. The Companys operations and financial performance can therefore be significantly affected by fluctuations in the values of the U.K. pound sterling and the U.S. dollar. Ryanair is particularly vulnerable to direct exchange rate risks between the euro and the U.S. dollar because a significant portion of its operating costs are incurred in U.S. dollars and none of its revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars.
Although the Company engages in foreign currency hedging transactions between the euro and the U.S. dollar, between the euro and the U.K. pound sterling, and between the U.K. pound sterling and the U.S. dollar, hedging activities cannot be expected to eliminate currency risks. See Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company May Not Be Successful in Increasing Fares to Cover Rising Business Costs. Ryanair operates a low-fares airline. The success of its business model depends on its ability to control costs so as to deliver low fares while at the same time earning a profit. Ryanair has limited control over its fuel costs and already has comparatively low operating costs. In periods of high fuel costs, if Ryanair is unable to further reduce its other operating costs or generate additional revenues, operating profits are likely to fall. Furthermore, as part of its change in marketing and airport strategy, the Company will expect increased marketing and advertising costs along with higher airport charges due to the increasing number of primary airports it operates to. Ryanair cannot offer any assurances regarding its future profitability. Changes in fuel costs and fuel availability could have a material adverse impact on Ryanairs results and could also increase
8
the likelihood that Ryanair may incur losses. See The Company Faces Significant Price and Other Pressures in a Highly Competitive Environment below and Changes in Fuel Costs and Fuel Availability Affect the Companys Results and Increase the Likelihood of Adverse Impact to the Companys Profitability above.
The Company is Subject to Legal Proceedings Alleging State Aid at Certain Airports. Formal investigations are ongoing by the European Commission into Ryanairs agreements with the Lübeck, Alghero, Frankfurt (Hahn), Zweibrücken, Altenburg, Klagenfurt, Stockholm (Vasteras), Paris (Beauvais), La Rochelle, Carcassonne, Brussels (Charleroi), Cagliari, Girona and Reus airports. The investigations seek to determine whether the arrangements constitute illegal state aid under EU law. The investigations are expected to be completed in mid to late 2014, with the European Commissions decisions being appealable to the EU General Court. Investigations between 2010 and 2014 into Ryanairs agreements with the Bratislava, Tampere, Marseille, Berlin (Schönefeld) and Aarhus airports concluded with findings that these agreements contained no state aid. On July 23, 2014 the European Commission announced a no state aid decision in respect of Dusseldorf (Weeze) airport, as well as findings of state aid to Ryanair in its arrangements with Pau, Nimes and Angouleme airports, ordering Ryanair to repay a total of approximately 9.7m of alleged aid. Ryanair will appeal these aid decisions to the EU General Court where proceedings are expected to take between 2 and 4 years. In addition to the European Commission investigations, Ryanair is facing allegations that it has benefited from unlawful state aid in a number of court cases, including in relation to its arrangements with Frankfurt (Hahn) and Lübeck airports. Adverse rulings in the above state aid matters could be used as precedents by competitors to challenge Ryanairs agreements with other publicly owned airports and could cause Ryanair to strongly reconsider its growth strategy in relation to public or state-owned airports across Europe. This could in turn lead to a scaling-back of Ryanairs overall growth strategy due to the smaller number of privately owned airports available for development.
On July 25, 2012, the European Commission decided that Ryanair, along with Aer Lingus Group plc (Aer Lingus) and Aer Arann, had been in receipt of unlawful state aid from the Irish government as a result of being an identified beneficiary of the two-tier air travel tax in place for flights departing from Irish airports between March 2009 and March 2011. Ryanair was the original complainant to the European Commission, alleging that the air travel tax favored Aer Arann and Aer Lingus. Ryanair appealed the decision of the European Commission to the EU General Court on November 14, 2012. The hearing in the EU General Court took place in June 2014, and judgment is expected within six months of the hearing. The EU General Court may affirm or annul the European Commission decision. The Irish State is obliged to recover the unlawful state aid from Ryanair before the Irish courts notwithstanding Ryanairs appeal of the EU Commission decision, and initiated its claim in April 2013. The Irish State is seeking approximately 12 million plus interest from Ryanair in these proceedings. Ryanair has also issued proceedings before the Irish courts for recovery of the entire amount of the air travel tax paid during the period March 2009March 2011 on the basis of the two-tier nature of the tax being unlawful under EU law.
No assurance can be given as to the outcome of these legal proceedings, nor as to whether any unfavorable outcomes may, individually or in the aggregate, have an adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of Ryanair.
For additional information, please see Item 8. Financial InformationOther Financial InformationLegal Proceedings.
The Company Faces Significant Price and Other Pressures in a Highly Competitive Environment. Ryanair operates in a highly competitive marketplace, with a number of low-fare, traditional and charter airlines competing throughout its route network. Airlines compete primarily in respect of fare levels, frequency and dependability of service, name recognition, passenger amenities (such as access to frequent flyer programmes), and the availability and convenience of other passenger services. Unlike Ryanair, certain competitors are state-owned or state-controlled flag carriers and in some cases may have greater name recognition and resources and may have received, or may receive in the future, significant amounts of subsidies and other state aid from their respective governments. In addition, the EU-U.S. Open Skies Agreement, which came into effect in March 2008, allows U.S. carriers to offer services in the intra-EU market, which could eventually result in increased competition in the EU market. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyGovernment RegulationLiberalization of the EU Air Transportation Market.
9
The airline industry is highly susceptible to price discounting, in part because airlines incur very low marginal costs for providing service to passengers occupying otherwise unsold seats. Both low-fare and traditional airlines sometimes offer low fares in direct competition with Ryanair across a significant proportion of its route network as a result of the liberalization of the EU air transport market and greater public acceptance of the low-fares model. Ryanairs average booked passenger fare decreased in the 2014 fiscal year, and there can be no assurance that it will not decrease further in future periods.
Although Ryanair intends to compete vigorously and to assert its rights against any predatory pricing or other similar conduct, price competition among airlines could reduce the level of fares and/or passenger traffic on Ryanairs routes to the point where profitability may not be achievable.
In addition to traditional competition among airline companies and charter operators who have entered the low-fares market, the industry also faces competition from ground transportation (including high-speed rail systems) and sea transportation alternatives, as businesses and recreational travellers seek substitutes for air travel.
The Company Will Incur Significant Costs Acquiring New Aircraft and Any Instability in the Credit and Capital Markets Could Negatively Impact Ryanairs Ability to Obtain Financing on Acceptable Terms. Ryanairs continued growth is dependent upon its ability to acquire additional aircraft to meet additional capacity needs and to replace older aircraft. Ryanair had 297 aircraft in its fleet by March 31, 2014 and has ordered an additional 180 new Boeing 737-800 next generation aircraft (the New Aircraft) for delivery during fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2019 pursuant to a contract with the Boeing Company (the 2013 Boeing Contract). Ryanair expects to have approximately 426 aircraft in its fleet by March 31, 2019, depending on the level of lease returns/disposals. For additional information on the Companys aircraft fleet and expansion plans, see Item 4. Information on the CompanyAircraft and Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsLiquidity and Capital Resources. There can be no assurance that this planned expansion will not outpace the growth of passenger traffic on Ryanairs routes or that traffic growth will not prove to be greater than the expanded fleet can accommodate. In either case, such developments could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, results of operations, and financial condition.
As a result of the 2013 Boeing Contract, the Company is expected to raise substantial debt financing to cover all of the expected aircraft deliveries over the period from September 2014 to December 2018, including Ryanairs issuance of 850.0 million in 1.875% unsecured eurobonds with a 7 year tenor in June 2014 that are guaranteed by Ryanair Holdings. This aircraft order is expected to increase the Companys outstanding debt from fiscal 2015 onwards. Furthermore, Ryanairs ability to raise unsecured or secured debt to pay for aircraft as they are delivered is subject to various conditions imposed by the counterparties and debt markets to such loan facilities and related loan guarantees, and any future financing is expected to be subject to similar conditions. Any failure by Ryanair to comply with such conditions would have a material adverse effect on its operations and financial condition.
Using the debt capital markets to finance the Company and the 2013 Boeing Contract requires the Company to obtain and retain investment grade credit ratings, (the Company has a BBB+ (stable) credit rating from S&P and a BBB+ (stable) credit rating from Fitch). There is a risk that the Company will be unable, or unwilling, to access these markets if it is downgraded or is unable to retain its investment grade credit ratings and this could lead to a higher cost of finance for Ryanair.
Ryanair has also entered into significant derivative transactions intended to hedge its current aircraft acquisition-related debt obligations. These derivative transactions expose Ryanair to certain risks and could have adverse effects on its results of operations and financial condition. See Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
10
The Companys Growth May Expose It to Risks. Ryanairs operations have grown rapidly since it pioneered the low-fares operating model in Europe in the early 1990s. Ryanair intends to continue to expand its fleet and add new destinations and additional flights, with the goal of increasing Ryanairs booked passenger volumes to approximately 112.0 million passengers per annum by March 31, 2019, an increase of approximately 37% from the approximately 81.7 million passengers booked in the 2014 fiscal year. However, no assurance can be given that this target will be met. If growth in passenger traffic and Ryanairs revenues do not keep pace with the planned expansion of its fleet, Ryanair could suffer from overcapacity and its results of operations and financial condition (including its ability to fund scheduled purchases of the New Aircraft and related debt repayments) could be materially adversely affected.
The continued expansion of Ryanairs fleet and operations, at a rate lower than in previous years (although in absolute terms it may be higher), in addition to other factors, may also strain existing management resources and related operational, financial, management information and information technology systems. Expansion will generally require additional skilled personnel, equipment, facilities and systems. An inability to hire skilled personnel or to secure required equipment and facilities efficiently and in a cost-effective manner may adversely affect Ryanairs ability to achieve its growth plans and sustain or increase its profitability.
Ryanairs New Routes and Expanded Operations May Have an Adverse Financial Impact on its Results. Currently, a substantial number of carriers operate routes that compete with Ryanair, and the Company expects to face further intense competition.
When Ryanair commences new routes, its load factors and fares tend to be lower than those on its established routes and its advertising and other promotional costs tend to be higher, which may result in initial losses that could have a material negative impact on Ryanairs results of operations as well as require a substantial amount of cash to fund. In addition, there can be no assurance that Ryanairs low-fares service will be accepted on new routes. Ryanair also periodically runs special promotional fare campaigns, in particular in connection with the opening of new routes. Promotional fares may have the effect of increasing load factors and reducing Ryanairs yield and passenger revenues on such routes during the periods that they are in effect. Ryanair has other significant cash needs as it expands, including as regards the cash required to fund aircraft purchases or aircraft deposits related to the acquisition of additional Boeing 737-800 series aircraft. There can be no assurance that Ryanair will have sufficient cash to make such expenditures and investments, and to the extent Ryanair is unable to expand its route system successfully, its future revenue and earnings growth will in turn be limited. See The Company Will Incur Significant Costs Acquiring New Aircraft and Any Instability in the Credit and Capital Markets Could Negatively Impact Ryanairs Ability to Obtain Financing on Acceptable Terms.
Ryanairs Continued Growth is Dependent on Access to Suitable Airports; Charges for Airport Access are Subject to Increase. Airline traffic at certain European airports is regulated by a system of grandfathered slot allocations. Each slot represents authorization to take-off and land at the particular airport during a specified time period. Although the majority of Ryanairs bases currently have no slot allocations, traffic at a minority of the airports Ryanair serves, including some of its primary bases, is currently regulated through slot allocations. In addition, many of the primary airports that Ryanair intends to serve as part of its recent strategic initiatives are subject to slot allocations. There can be no assurance that Ryanair will be able to obtain a sufficient number of slots at slot-controlled airports that it may wish to serve in the future, at the time it needs them, or on acceptable terms. There can also be no assurance that its non-slot constrained bases, or the other non-slot constrained airports Ryanair serves, will continue to operate without slot allocation restrictions in the future. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyGovernment RegulationSlots. Airports may impose other operating restrictions such as curfews, limits on aircraft noise levels, mandatory flight paths, runway restrictions, and limits on the number of average daily departures. Such restrictions may limit the ability of Ryanair to provide service to, or increase service at, such airports.
Ryanairs future growth also materially depends on its ability to access suitable airports located in its targeted geographic markets at costs that are consistent with Ryanairs strategy. Any condition that denies, limits, or delays Ryanairs access to airports it serves or seeks to serve in the future would constrain
11
Ryanairs ability to grow. A change in the terms of Ryanairs access to these facilities or any increase in the relevant charges paid by Ryanair as a result of the expiration or termination of such arrangements and Ryanairs failure to renegotiate comparable terms or rates could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations. For example in Spain, the Spanish government increased airport taxes at the two largest airports, Barcelona and Madrid, by over 100%, while smaller increases were implemented at other Spanish airports effective from July 1, 2012. As a result, Ryanair cancelled routes and reduced capacity on remaining routes from Madrid and Barcelona in response to the Spanish governments decision to double airport taxes at the two airports. For additional information, see Item 4. Information on the CompanyAirport OperationsAirport Charges. See also The Company Is Subject to Legal Proceedings Alleging State Aid at Certain Airports.
The Companys Acquisition of 29.8% of Aer Lingus and Subsequent Failure to Conclude a Complete Acquisition of Aer Lingus Could Expose the Company to Risk. During the 2007 fiscal year, the Company acquired 25.2% of Aer Lingus. The Company increased its interest to 29.3% during the 2008 fiscal year, and to 29.8% during the 2009 fiscal year at a total aggregate cost of 407.2 million. Following the acquisition of its initial stake and upon the approval of the Companys shareholders, management proposed to effect a tender offer to acquire the entire share capital of Aer Lingus. This 2006 offer was, however, prohibited by the European Commission on competition grounds.
In October 2007, the European Commission reached a formal decision that it would not force Ryanair to sell its shares in Aer Lingus. This decision has been affirmed on appeal. However, EU legislation may change in the future to require such a forced disposition. If eventually forced to dispose of its stake in Aer Lingus, Ryanair could suffer significant losses due to the negative impact on market prices of the forced sale of such a significant portion of Aer Lingus shares.
The United Kingdoms Office of Fair Trading (OFT) wrote to Ryanair in September 2010, advising that it intended to investigate Ryanairs minority stake in Aer Lingus. Ryanair objected on the basis that the OFTs investigation was time-barred. On June 15, 2012, the OFT referred the investigation of Ryanairs minority stake in Aer Lingus to the U.K. Competition Commission (the Competition Commission).
On June 19, 2012, Ryanair announced its third all cash offer to acquire all of the ordinary shares of Aer Lingus it did not own at a price of 1.30 per ordinary share and immediately commenced pre-notification discussions with the European Commission for the purpose of preparing a merger filing. Ryanair contended that, pending the outcome of the European Commissions review of Ryanairs bid, on the basis of the duty of sincere cooperation between the EU and the Member States, and under the EU Merger Regulation, the UK Competition Commissions investigation of Ryanairs minority stake in Aer Lingus should not have properly proceeded. Nevertheless, Aer Lingus argued that the investigation should proceed and that Ryanairs offer was in breach of certain provisions of the UK Enterprise Act 2002.
On July 10, 2012, the Competition Commission ruled that Ryanairs bid was not in breach of the UK Enterprise Act, but nevertheless decided that its investigation of the minority stake could proceed in parallel with the European Commissions investigation of Ryanairs offer for Aer Lingus. In July 2012, Ryanair appealed the latter part of the Competition Commissions ruling to the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal, and the Competition Commissions investigation became suspended pending the appeal process. On August 8, 2012, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) rejected Ryanairs appeal and found that the Competition Commissions investigation could proceed in parallel with the European Commissions investigation, but that the Competition Commission must avoid taking any final decision which could conflict with the European Commissions ultimate conclusion on Ryanairs bid. In August 2012, Ryanair appealed the Competition Appeal Tribunal judgment to the UK Court of Appeal. In December 2012, the Court of Appeal rejected Ryanairs appeal and subsequently the Competition Commissions investigation restarted. On December 13, 2012, Ryanair applied to the UK Supreme Court for permission to appeal the judgment of the UK Court of Appeal. The UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal on April 25, 2013.
12
On February 27, 2013, the European Commission prohibited Ryanairs bid to acquire the entire share capital of Aer Lingus on the claimed basis that it would be incompatible with the EU internal market. Ryanair appealed this decision to the EU General Court on May 8, 2013. The judgment of the EU General Court is expected in 2015 and may affirm or annul the decision of the European Commission.
Following the European Commissions decision to prohibit its offer for Aer Lingus, Ryanair actively engaged with the UK Competition Commissions investigation of the minority stake. On August 28, 2013, the UK Competition Commission (the UKCC) issued its final decision in which it found that Ryanairs shareholding gave it the ability to exercise material influence over Aer Lingus and had led or may be expected to lead to a substantial lessening of competition in the markets for air passenger services between Great Britain and Ireland. As a result of its findings, the UKCC ordered Ryanair to reduce its shareholding in Aer Lingus to below 5 percent of Aer Lingus issued ordinary shares. Ryanair appealed the UKCCs final decision to the CAT on September 23, 2013. The CAT rejected Ryanairs appeal on March 7, 2014. On April 23, 2014, the CAT granted Ryanair permission to appeal the CATs judgment to the UK Court of Appeal. Should this appeal or any subsequent appeal to the UK Supreme Court be unsuccessful, Ryanair could suffer losses due to the negative impact on market prices of the forced sale of such a significant portion of Aer Lingus shares. Ryanair believes that the enforcement of any such decision should be delayed until the outcome of Ryanairs appeal against the European Commissions February 2013 prohibition decision of Ryanairs 2012 offer for Aer Lingus, and the conclusion of any appeals against the UKCCs decision in the UK courts. However, it is possible that the UKCC will seek to enforce any such sell-down remedy at an earlier date. For more information, see Item 8. Financial InformationOther Financial InformationLegal ProceedingsMatters Related to Investment in Aer Lingus.
Labor Relations Could Expose the Company to Risk. A variety of factors, including, but not limited to, Ryanairs profitability and its seasonal grounding policy, may make it difficult for Ryanair to avoid increases to salary levels and productivity payments. Consequently, there can be no assurance that Ryanairs existing employee compensation arrangements may not be subject to change or modification at any time. These steps may lead to deterioration in labor relations in Ryanair and could impact Ryanairs business or results. Ryanair also operates in certain jurisdictions with above average payroll taxes and employee-related social insurance costs, which could have an impact on the availability and cost of employees in these jurisdictions. Ryanairs crew in continental Europe generally operate on Irish contracts of employment on the basis that those crew work on Irish Territory, (i.e., on board Irish Registered Aircraft). A number of challenges have been initiated by government agencies in a number of countries to the applicability of Irish labor law to these contracts, and if Ryanair were forced to concede that Irish jurisdiction did not apply to those crew who operate from continental Europe then it could lead to increased salary, social insurance and pension costs and a potential loss of flexibility. In relation to social insurance costs, the European Parliament implemented amendments to Regulation (EC) 883/2004 which, in the majority of jurisdictions, imposes substantial social insurance contribution increases for either or both Ryanair and the individual employees. While this change to social insurance contributions relates primarily to new employees, its effect in the long term may materially increase Company or employee social insurance contributions and could affect Ryanairs decision to operate from those high cost locations, resulting in redundancies and a consequent deterioration in labor relations. For additional details seeChange in EU Regulations in Relation to Employers and Employee Social Insurance could Increase Costs below.
Ryanair currently conducts collective bargaining negotiations with groups of employees, including its pilots and cabin crew, regarding pay, work practices, and conditions of employment, through collective-bargaining units called Employee Representative Committees. On June 19, 2009, BALPA (the U.K. pilots union) made a request for voluntary recognition under applicable U.K. legislation, which Ryanair rejected. BALPA had the option of applying to the U.K.s Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) to organize a vote on union recognition by Ryanairs pilots in relevant bargaining units, as determined by the CAC, but BALPA decided not to proceed with an application at that time. The option to apply for a ballot remains open to BALPA and if it were to seek and be successful in such a ballot, it would be able to represent the U.K. pilots in negotiations over salaries and working conditions. Limitations on Ryanairs flexibility in dealing with its employees or the altering of the publics perception of Ryanair generally could have a material adverse effect on Ryanairs business, operating results, and financial condition. For
13
additional details, see Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and EmployeesStaff and Labor Relations. Limitations on Ryanairs flexibility in dealing with its staff or the altering of the publics perception of Ryanair generally could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, operating results, and financial condition.
The Company is Dependent on External Service Providers. Ryanair currently assigns its engine overhauls and rotable repairs to outside contractors approved under the terms of Part 145, the European regulatory standard for aircraft maintenance established by the European Aviation Safety Agency (Part 145). The Company also assigns its passenger, aircraft and ground handling services at airports other than Dublin and certain airports in Spain and the Canary Islands to established external service providers. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyMaintenance and RepairsHeavy Maintenance and Item 4. Information on the CompanyAirport OperationsAirport Handling Services.
The termination or expiration of any of Ryanairs service contracts or any inability to renew them or negotiate replacement contracts with other service providers at comparable rates could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations. Ryanair will need to enter into airport service agreements in any new markets it enters, and there can be no assurance that it will be able to obtain the necessary facilities and services at competitive rates. In addition, although Ryanair seeks to monitor the performance of external parties that provide passenger and aircraft handling services, the efficiency, timeliness, and quality of contract performance by external providers are largely beyond Ryanairs direct control. Ryanair expects to be dependent on such outsourcing arrangements for the foreseeable future.
The Company is Dependent on Key Personnel. Ryanairs success depends to a significant extent upon the efforts and abilities of its senior management team, including Michael OLeary, the Chief Executive Officer, and key financial, commercial, operating and maintenance personnel. Mr. OLearys current contract may be terminated by either party upon 12 months notice. See Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and EmployeesCompensation of Directors and Senior ManagementEmployment and Bonus Agreement with Mr. OLeary. Ryanairs success also depends on the ability of its executive officers and other members of senior management to operate and manage effectively, both independently and as a group. Although Ryanairs employment agreements with Mr. OLeary and some of its other senior executives contain non-competition and non-disclosure provisions, there can be no assurance that these provisions will be enforceable in whole or in part. Competition for highly qualified personnel is intense, and either the loss of any executive officer, senior manager, or other key employee without adequate replacement or the inability to attract new qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect upon Ryanairs business, operating results, and financial condition.
The Company Faces Risks Related to its Internet Reservations Operations and its Announced Elimination of Airport Check-in Facilities. Over 99% of Ryanairs flight reservations are made through its website. Although Ryanair has established a contingency program whereby the website is hosted in three separate locations, each of these locations accesses the same booking engine, located at a single center, in order to make reservations.
A back-up booking engine is available to Ryanair to support its existing platform in the event of a breakdown in this facility. Nonetheless, the process of switching over to the back-up engine could take some time and there can be no assurance that Ryanair would not suffer a significant loss of reservations in the event of a major breakdown of its booking engine or other related systems, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on Ryanairs operating results or financial condition.
Since October 1, 2009, all passengers have been required to use Internet check-in. Internet check-in is part of a package of measures intended to reduce check-in lines and passenger handling costs and pass on these savings by reducing passenger airfares. Ryanair has deployed this system across its network. Any disruptions to the Internet check-in service as a result of a breakdown in the relevant computer systems or otherwise could have a material adverse impact on these service-improvement and cost-reduction efforts. There can be no assurance, however, that this process will continue to be successful or that consumers will not switch to other carriers that provide standard check-in facilities, which would negatively affect Ryanairs results of operations and financial condition.
14
The Company Faces Risks Related to Unauthorized Use of Information from the Companys Website. Screenscraper websites gain unauthorized access to Ryanairs website and booking system, extract flight and pricing information and display it on their own websites for sale to customers at prices which may include hidden intermediary fees on top of Ryanairs fares. Ryanair does not allow any such commercial use of its website and objects to the practice of screenscraping also on the basis of certain legal principles, such as database rights, copyright protection, etc. Ryanair is involved in a number of legal proceedings against the proprietors of screenscraper websites in Ireland, Germany, The Netherlands, France, Spain, Italy and Switzerland. Ryanairs objective is to prevent any unauthorized use of its website. Ryanair does allow certain companies who operate fare comparison (i.e. not reselling) websites to access its schedule and fare information for the purposes of fare comparison provided they sign a license and use the agreed method to access the data. Ryanair also permits Travelport (trading as Galileo and Worldspan, a GDS operator) to provide access to Ryanairs fares to traditional travel agencies. Ryanair has received favourable rulings in Ireland, Germany and The Netherlands, and unfavorable rulings in Spain, France and Italy, in its actions against screenscrapers. However, pending the outcome of these legal proceedings and if Ryanair were to be ultimately unsuccessful in them, the activities of screenscraper websites could lead to a reduction in the number of customers who book directly on Ryanairs website and consequently to a reduction in Ryanairs ancillary revenue stream. Also, some customers may be lost to Ryanair once they are presented by a screenscraper website with a Ryanair fare inflated by the screenscrapers intermediary fee. This could also adversely affect Ryanairs reputation as a low-fares airline, which could negatively affect Ryanairs results of operations and financial condition.
For additional details, see Item 8. Financial InformationOther Financial InformationLegal ProceedingsLegal Proceedings Against Internet Ticket Touts.
Ryanair is Subject To Cyber Security Risks And May Incur Increasing Costs In An Effort To Minimise Those Risks. As almost all of Ryanairs reservations are made through its website, security breaches could expose it to a risk of loss or misuse of customer information, litigation and potential liability. Although Ryanair takes steps to secure its website and management information systems, the security measures it has implemented may not be effective, and its systems may be vulnerable to theft, loss, damage and interruption from a number of potential sources and events, including unauthorized access or security breaches, cyber attacks, computer viruses, power loss, or other disruptive events. Ryanair may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or prevent rapidly evolving types of cyber attacks. Attacks may be targeted at Ryanair, its customers and suppliers, or others who have entrusted it with information.
In addition, data and security breaches can also occur as a result of non-technical issues, including breaches by Ryanair or by persons with whom it has commercial relationships that result in the unauthorized release of personal or confidential information. Any such cyber attack or other security issue could result in a significant loss of reservations and customer confidence in the website and its business which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on Ryanairs operating results or financial condition and potentially entail its incurring significant litigation or other costs.
The Irish Corporation Tax Rate Could Rise. The majority of Ryanairs profits are subject to Irish corporation tax at a statutory rate of 12.5%. Due to the size and scale of the Irish governments budgetary deficit and although Ireland has exited the bailout which was funded by a combination of loans from the International Monetary Fund and the European Union, there remains a risk that the Irish government could increase Irish corporation tax rates above 12.5% in order to repay current or future loans or to increase tax revenues.
At 12.5%, the rate of Irish corporation tax is lower than that applied by most of the other European Union member states, and has periodically been subject to critical comment by the governments of other EU member states. Although the Irish government has repeatedly publicly stated that it will not increase corporation tax rates, there can be no assurance that such an increase in corporation tax rates will not occur.
In the event that the Irish government increases corporation tax rates or changes the basis of calculation of corporation tax from the present basis, any such changes would result in the Company paying higher corporate taxes and would have an adverse impact on our cash flows, financial position and results of operations.
15
Change in EU Regulations in Relation to Employers and Employee Social Insurance Could Increase Costs. The European Parliament passed legislation governing the payment of employee and employer social insurance costs in May 2012. The legislation was introduced in late June 2012. The legislation governs the country in which employees and employers must pay social insurance costs. Prior to June 2012, Ryanair paid employee and employer social insurance in the country under whose laws the employees contract of employment is governed, which is either the U.K. or Ireland. Under the terms of this new legislation, employees and employers must pay social insurance in the country where the employee is based. The legislation includes grandfathering rights which means that existing employees (i.e. those employed prior to the introduction of the new legislation in June 2012) should be exempt from the effects of this legislation for a period of 10 years up until 2022. However, both new and existing employees who transfer from their present base location to a new base in another EU country may be impacted by the new rules in relation to employee and employer contributions. Each country within the EU has different rules and rates in relation to the calculation of employee and employer social insurance contributions. Ryanair estimates that the change in legislation will not have any initial material impact on its salary costs although it will have an adverse impact over time in the majority of jurisdictions in which Ryanair currently operates from.
Ryanair is Subject to Tax Audits. The Company operates in many jurisdictions and is, from time to time, subject to tax audits, which by their nature are often complex and can require several years to conclude. While the Company is of the view that it is tax compliant in the various jurisdictions in which it operates, there can be no guarantee, particularly in the current economic environment, that it will not receive tax assessments following the conclusion of the tax audits. If assessed, the Company will robustly defend its position. In the event that the Company is unsuccessful in defending its position, it is possible that the effective tax rate, employment and other costs of the Company could materially increase. See The Irish Corporation Tax Rate Could Rise above.
Risks Associated with the Euro. The Company is headquartered in Ireland and its reporting currency is the euro. As a result of the ongoing uncertainty arising from the Eurozone debt crisis, in 2012 there was widespread speculation regarding the future of the Eurozone, including with regard to Ireland, the country in which the Company is headquartered. Although the economic environment in Ireland has considerably improved, there is still a risk of contagion spreading to the weaker Eurozone members. To date, however, there have been no exits from the Eurozone. Ryanair predominantly operates to/from countries within the Eurozone and has significant operational and financial exposures to the Eurozone that could result in a reduction in the operating performance of Ryanair or the devaluation of certain assets. Ryanair has taken certain risk management measures to minimize any disruptions, however these risk management measures may be insufficient.
The Company has cash and aircraft assets and debt liabilities that are denominated in euro on its balance sheet. In addition, the positive/negative mark-to-market value of derivative-based transactions are recorded in euro as either assets or liabilities on the Companys balance sheet. Uncertainty regarding the future of the Eurozone could have a materially adverse effect on the value of these assets and liabilities. In addition to the assets and liabilities on Ryanairs balance sheet, the Company has a number of cross currency risks as a result of the jurisdictions of the operating business including non-euro revenues, fuel costs, certain maintenance costs and insurance costs. A weakening in the value of the euro primarily against U.K. pound sterling and U.S. dollar, but also against other non-Eurozone European currencies and Moroccan Dirhams, could negatively impact the operating results of the Company.
Recession, austerity and uncertainty in connection with the euro could also mean that Ryanair is unable to grow. The recent European recession and austerity measures still in effect in several European countries could mean that Ryanair may be unable to expand its operations due to lack of demand for air travel.
16
Risks Related to the Airline Industry
The Airline Industry Is Particularly Sensitive to Changes in Economic Conditions: A Continued Recessionary Environment Would Negatively Impact Ryanairs Result of Operations. Ryanairs operations and the airline industry in general are sensitive to changes in economic conditions. Unfavorable economic conditions such as government austerity measures, the uncertainty relating to the Eurozone, high unemployment rates, constrained credit markets and increased business operating costs could lead to reduced spending by both leisure and business passengers. Unfavorable economic conditions, such as the conditions persisting as of the date hereof, also tend to impact Ryanairs ability to raise fares to counteract increased fuel and other operating costs. A continued recessionary environment, combined with austerity measures by European governments, will likely negatively impact Ryanairs operating results. It could also restrict the Companys ability to grow passenger volumes, secure new airports and launch new routes and bases, and could have a material adverse impact on its financial results.
The Introduction of Government Taxes on Travel Could Damage Ryanairs Ability to Grow and Could Have a Material Adverse Impact on Operations. The U.K. government levies an Air Passenger Duty (APD) of £13 per passenger. The tax was previously set at £5 per passenger, but it was increased to £10 per passenger in 2007, £11 in 2009, £12 in 2010 and subsequently to £13 in April 2012. The increase in this tax is thought to have had a negative impact on Ryanairs operating performance, both in terms of average fares paid and growth in passenger volumes. In 2008, the Dutch government introduced a travel tax ranging from 11 on short-haul flights to 45 on long-haul flights (withdrawn with effect from July 1, 2009). On March 30, 2009, the Irish government also introduced a 10 Air Travel Tax on all passengers departing from Irish airports on routes longer than 300 kilometers but subsequently reduced it to 3 on March 30, 2011. On April 1, 2014 the tax imposed by the Irish government was abolished. In Germany, the government introduced an air passenger tax of 8 in January 2011 which was subsequently reduced to 7.50 in January 2012. In Austria, the government also introduced an ecological air travel levy of 8 in January 2011. The Moroccan government has also introduced a similar tax (equivalent to approximately 9) from April 2014.
Other governments also have introduced or may introduce similar taxes. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyAirport OperationsAirport Charges. The introduction of government taxes on travel has had a negative impact on passenger volumes, particularly given the current period of decreased economic activity. The introduction of further government taxes on travel across Europe could have a material negative impact on Ryanairs results of operations as a result of price-sensitive passengers being less likely to travel.
EU Regulation on Passenger Compensation Could Significantly Increase Related Costs. EU Regulation (EC) No. 261/2004 requires airlines to compensate passengers (holding a valid ticket) who have been denied boarding or whose flight has been cancelled or delayed more than 3 hours on arrival (even where the reason for the delay or cancellation is beyond the control of the airline). This legislation, which came into force on February 17, 2005, imposes fixed levels of compensation to be paid to passengers in the event of the situations described above. In November 2009, the Court of Justice of the EU in the Sturgeon case decided that provisions of the legislation in relation to monetary compensation are not only applicable to denied boarding and flight cancellations but also to flight delays (over three hours on arrival). However, such provisions do not apply when the flight cancellation or delay (over three hours on arrival), is caused for reasons outside of the control of the airline (extraordinary circumstances) such as unsafe weather conditions, air-traffic control strikes/delays, unexpected flight safety shortcomings, sabotage, aircraft manufacturing defects, security risks, political instability. A recent UK court caseHuzar vs. Jet2 heard in the UK Court of Appeal in May 2014 has narrowed the extraordinary circumstances defence, this case is currently on appeal to the UK Supreme Court and has a suspensory effect on all passenger claims brought in the UK in relation to flight delays or cancellations caused by unexpected flight safety shortcomings. The regulation calls for compensation of 250, 400, or 600 per passenger, depending on the length of the flight. As Ryanairs average flight length is less than 1,500 kmthe upper limit for short-haul flightsthe amount payable is generally 250 per passenger. Passengers subject to flight delays over 2 hours are also entitled to assistance, including meals, drinks and telephone calls, as well as hotel accommodations if the delay extends overnight. For delays of over five hours, the airline is also required to offer the option of a
17
refund of the cost of the unused ticket. There can be no assurance that the Company will not incur a significant increase in costs in the future due to the impact of this legislation, if Ryanair experiences a large number of cancelled flights, which could occur as a result of certain types of events beyond its control. See Risks Related to the Airline IndustryVolcanic Ash Emissions Could Affect the Company and Have a Material Adverse Effect on the Companys Results of Operations.
EU Regulation of Emissions Trading Will Increase Costs. On November 19, 2008, the European Council of Ministers adopted legislation to add aviation to the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) with effect from 2012. This scheme, which has thus far applied mainly to industrial companies, is a cap-and-trade system for CO2 emissions to encourage industries to improve their CO2 efficiency. Under the legislation, airlines are granted initial CO2 allowances based on historical performance and a CO2 efficiency benchmark. Any shortage of allowances will have to be purchased in the open market and/or at government auctions. The cost of such allowances in the context of the Companys energy costs are not material at current market prices. There can be no assurance that Ryanair will be able to obtain sufficient carbon credits or that the cost of the credits will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, operating results, and financial condition.
Volcanic Ash Emissions Could Affect the Company and Have a Material Adverse Effect on the Companys Results of Operations. Between April 15 and April 20, 2010 and May 4 and May 17, 2010, a significant portion of the airspace over northern Europe was closed by authorities as a result of safety concerns presented by emissions of ash from an Icelandic volcano. This closure forced Ryanair to cancel 9,490 flights. In May 2011, there were further periodic closures of parts of the European airspace due to emissions of ash from another Icelandic volcano, which resulted in the cancellation of 96 flights.
Under the terms of Regulation (EC) No. 261/2004, described above, Ryanair has certain duties to passengers whose flights are cancelled. In particular, Ryanair is required to reimburse passengers who have had their flights cancelled for certain reasonable, documented expensesprimarily for accommodation and food.
Volcanic emissions may happen again and could lead to further significant flight cancellation costs which could have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, volcanic emissions (whether from current or new sources) or similar atmospheric disturbances and resulting cancellations due to the closure of airports could also have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial performance indirectly, as a consequence of changes in the publics willingness to travel within Europe due to the risk of flight disruptions.
Any Significant Outbreak of any Airborne Disease Could Significantly Damage Ryanairs Business. Worldwide, there has, from time to time, been substantial publicity in recent years regarding certain potent influenza viruses and other disease epidemics. Publicity of this type may have a negative impact on demand for air travel in Europe. Past outbreaks of MERS, SARS, foot-and-mouth disease, avian flu and swine flu have adversely impacted the travel industries, including aviation, in certain regions of the world, including Europe. The Company believes that if any influenza or other pandemic becomes severe in Europe, its effect on demand for air travel in the markets in which Ryanair operates could be material, and it could therefore have a significantly adverse impact on the Company. A severe outbreak of swine flu, MERS, SARS, foot-and-mouth disease, avian flu or another pandemic or livestock-related disease also may result in European or national authorities imposing restrictions on travel, further damaging Ryanairs business. A serious pandemic could therefore severely disrupt Ryanairs business, resulting in the cancellation or loss of bookings, and adversely affecting Ryanairs financial condition and results of operations.
The Company is Dependent on the Continued Acceptance of Low-fares Airlines. Ryanair has an excellent 30 year safety record. In past years, however, accidents or other safety-related incidents involving certain low-fares airlines have had a negative impact on the publics acceptance of such airlines. Any adverse event potentially relating to the safety or reliability of low-fares airlines (including accidents or negative reports from regulatory authorities) could adversely impact the publics perception of, and confidence in, low-fares airlines like Ryanair, and could have a material adverse effect on Ryanairs financial condition and results of operations.
18
Terrorism in the United Kingdom or Elsewhere in Europe Could Have a Material Detrimental Effect on the Company. On August 10, 2006, U.K. security authorities arrested and subsequently charged eight individuals in connection with an alleged plot to attack aircraft operating on transatlantic routes. As a result of these arrests, U.K. authorities introduced increased security measures, which resulted in all passengers being body-searched, and a ban on the transportation in carry-on baggage of certain liquids and gels. The introduction of these measures led to passengers suffering severe delays while passing through these airport security checks. As a result, Ryanair cancelled 279 flights in the days following the incident and refunded a total of 2.7 million in fares to approximately 40,000 passengers. In the days following the arrests, Ryanair also suffered reductions in bookings estimated to have resulted in the loss of approximately 1.9 million of additional revenue. As in the past, the Company reacted to these adverse events by initiating system-wide fare sales to stimulate demand for air travel.
In addition, reservations on Ryanairs flights to London dropped materially for a number of days in the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks in London on July 7, 2005. Although the terrorist attack in Glasgow on June 30, 2007 and the failed terrorist attacks in London on July 21, 2005 and June 29, 2007 had no material impact on bookings, there can be no assurance that future such attacks will not affect passenger traffic. In the 2014 fiscal year, 16.6 million passengers were booked on Ryanairs flights into and out of London, representing approximately 20.4% of the total passengers booked on all of the Companys flights in the fiscal year. Future acts of terrorism or significant terrorist threats, particularly in London or other markets that are significant to Ryanair, could have a material adverse effect on the Companys profitability or financial condition should the publics willingness to travel to and from those markets decline as a result. See also The 2001 Terrorist Attacks on the United States Had a Severe Negative Impact on the International Airline Industry below.
The 2001 Terrorist Attacks on the United States Had a Severe Negative Impact on the International Airline Industry. The terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, in which four commercial aircraft were hijacked, had a severe negative impact on the international airline industry, particularly on U.S. carriers and carriers operating international services to and from the United States. Although carriers such as Ryanair that operate primarily or exclusively in Europe were generally spared from such material adverse impacts on their businesses, the cost to all commercial airlines of insurance coverage for certain third-party liabilities arising from acts of war or terrorism increased dramatically after the September 11 attacks. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyInsurance. In addition, Ryanairs insurers have indicated that the scope of the Companys current act of war-related insurance may exclude certain types of catastrophic incidents, such as certain forms of biological, chemical or dirty bomb attacks. This could result in the Companys seeking alternative coverage, including government insurance or self-insurance, which could lead to further increases in costs. Although Ryanair to date has included increased insurance costs in the ticket price charged to passengers, there can be no assurance that it will continue to be successful in doing so.
Because a substantial portion of airline travel (both business and personal) is discretionary and because Ryanair is substantially dependent on discretionary air travel, any prolonged general reduction in airline passenger traffic may adversely affect the Company. Similarly, any significant increase in expenses related to security, insurance or related costs could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Any further terrorist attacks in the U.S. or in Europe, particularly in London or other markets that are significant to Ryanair, any significant military actions by the United States or EU nations or any related economic downturn may have a material adverse effect on demand for air travel and thus on Ryanairs business, operating results, and financial condition. See also Terrorism in the United Kingdom or Elsewhere in Europe Could have a Material Detrimental Effect on the Company.
The Company Faces the Risk of Loss and Liability. Ryanair has an excellent 30 year safety record, however, it is exposed to potential catastrophic losses that may be incurred in the event of an aircraft accident or terrorist incident. Any such accident or incident could involve costs related to the repair or replacement of a damaged aircraft and its consequent temporary or permanent loss from service. In
19
addition, an accident or incident could result in significant legal claims against the Company from injured passengers and others who experienced injury or property damage as a result of the accident or incident, including ground victims. Ryanair currently maintains passenger liability insurance, employer liability insurance, aircraft insurance for aircraft loss or damage, and other business insurance in amounts per occurrence that are consistent with industry standards.
Ryanair currently believes its insurance coverage is adequate (although not comprehensive). However, there can be no assurance that the amount of insurance coverage will not need to be increased, that insurance premiums will not increase significantly, or that Ryanair will not be forced to bear substantial losses from any accidents not covered by its insurance. Airline insurance costs increased dramatically following the September 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States. See The 2001 Terrorist Attacks on the United States Had a Severe Negative Impact on the International Airline Industry above. Substantial claims resulting from an accident in excess of related insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, any aircraft accident, even if fully insured, could lead to the public perception that Ryanairs aircraft were less safe or reliable than those operated by other airlines, which could have a material adverse effect on Ryanairs business.
EU Regulation No. 2027/97, as amended by Regulation No. 889/2002, governs air carrier liability. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyInsurance for details of this regulation. This regulation increased the potential liability exposure of air carriers such as Ryanair. Although Ryanair has extended its liability insurance to meet the requirements of the regulation, no assurance can be given that other laws, regulations, or policies will not be applied, modified or amended in a manner that has a material adverse effect on Ryanairs business, operating results, and financial condition.
Airline Industry Margins are Subject to Significant Uncertainty. The airline industry is capital intensive and is characterized by high fixed costs and by revenues that generally exhibit substantially greater elasticity than costs. Although fuel accounted for approximately 46% of total operating expenses in the 2014 fiscal year, management anticipates that this percentage may vary significantly in future years. See Changes in Fuel Costs and Fuel Availability Affect the Companys Results and Increase the Likelihood of Adverse Impact on the Companys Profitability above. The operating costs of each flight do not vary significantly with the number of passengers flown, and therefore, a relatively small change in the number of passengers, fare pricing, or traffic mix could have a disproportionate effect on operating and financial results. Accordingly, a relatively minor shortfall from expected revenue levels could have a material adverse effect on the Companys growth or financial performance. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects. The very low marginal costs incurred for providing services to passengers occupying otherwise unsold seats are also a factor in the industrys high susceptibility to price discounting. See Risks Related to the CompanyThe Company Faces Significant Price and Other Pressures in a Highly Competitive Environment above.
Safety-Related Undertakings Could Affect the Companys Results. Aviation authorities in Europe and the United States periodically require or suggest that airlines implement certain safety-related procedures on their aircraft. In recent years, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (the FAA) has required a number of such procedures with regard to Boeing 737-800 aircraft, including checks of rear pressure bulkheads and flight control modules, redesign of the rudder control system, and limitations on certain operating procedures. Ryanairs policy is to implement any such required procedures in accordance with FAA guidance and to perform such procedures in close collaboration with Boeing. To date, all such procedures have been conducted as part of Ryanairs standard maintenance programme and have not interrupted flight schedules nor required any material increases in Ryanairs maintenance expenses. However, there can be no assurance that the FAA or other regulatory authorities will not recommend or require other safety-related undertakings or that such undertakings would not adversely impact Ryanairs operating results or financial condition.
There also can be no assurance that new regulations will not be implemented in the future that would apply to Ryanairs aircraft and result in an increase in Ryanairs cost of maintenance or other costs beyond managements current estimates. In addition, should Ryanairs aircraft cease to be sufficiently reliable or should any public perception develop that Ryanairs aircraft are less than completely reliable, Ryanairs business could be materially adversely affected.
20
Risks Related to Ownership of the Companys Ordinary Shares or ADRs
EU Rules Impose Restrictions on the Ownership of Ryanair Holdings Ordinary Shares by Non-EU Nationals, and the Company Has Instituted a Ban on the Purchase of Ordinary Shares by Non-EU Nationals. EU Regulation No. 1008/2008 requires that, in order to obtain and retain an operating license, an EU air carrier must be majority-owned and effectively controlled by EU nationals. The regulation does not specify what level of share ownership will confer effective control on a holder or holders of Ordinary Shares. The Board of Directors of Ryanair Holdings is given certain powers under Ryanair Holdings articles of association (the Articles) to take action to ensure that the number of Ordinary Shares held in Ryanair Holdings by non-EU nationals (Affected Shares) does not reach a level that could jeopardize the Companys entitlement to continue to hold or enjoy the benefit of any license, permit, consent, or privilege which it holds or enjoys and which enables it to carry on business as an air carrier. The directors, from time to time, set a Permitted Maximum on the number of the Companys Ordinary Shares that may be owned by non-EU nationals at such level as they believe will comply with EU law. The Permitted Maximum is currently set at 49.9%. In addition, under certain circumstances, the directors can take action to safeguard the Companys ability to operate by identifying those Ordinary Shares, American Depositary Shares (ADSs) or Affected Shares which give rise to the need to take action and treat such Ordinary Shares, the American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) evidencing such ADSs, or Affected Shares as Restricted Shares. The Board of Directors may, under certain circumstances, deprive holders of Restricted Shares of their rights to attend, vote at, and speak at general meetings, and/or require such holders to dispose of their Restricted Shares to an EU national within as little as 21 days. The directors are also given the power to transfer such Restricted Shares themselves if a holder fails to comply. In 2002, the Company implemented measures to restrict the ability of non-EU nationals to purchase Ordinary Shares, and non-EU nationals are currently effectively barred from purchasing Ordinary Shares, and will remain so for as long as these restrictions remain in place. There can be no assurance that these restrictions will ever be lifted. Additionally, these foreign ownership restrictions could result in Ryanairs exclusion from certain stock tracking indices. Any such exclusion may adversely affect the market price of the Ordinary Shares and ADRs. On April 19, 2012, the Company obtained shareholder approval to repurchase ADRs as part of its general authority to repurchase up to 5% of the issued share capital in the Company. During fiscal 2014, the Company repurchased 6,018,800 ADRs equivalent to 30,094,000 ordinary shares at a price of $49.01 per ADR, equivalent to approximately 7.41 per ordinary share. See Item 10. Additional InformationLimitations on Share Ownership by Non-EU Nationals for a detailed discussion of restrictions on share ownership and the current ban on share purchases by non-EU nationals.
As of June 30, 2014, EU nationals owned at least 52.8% of Ryanair Holdings Ordinary Shares (assuming conversion of all outstanding ADRs into Ordinary Shares).
Holders of Ordinary Shares are Currently Unable to Convert those Shares into American Depositary Receipts. In an effort to increase the percentage of its share capital held by EU nationals, on June 26, 2001, Ryanair Holdings instructed The Bank of New York Mellon, the depositary for its ADR program (the Depositary), to suspend the issuance of new ADRs in exchange for the deposit of Ordinary Shares until further notice. Holders of Ordinary Shares cannot convert their Ordinary Shares into ADRs during this suspension, and there can be no assurance that the suspension will ever be lifted. See also EU Rules Impose Restrictions on the Ownership of Ryanair Holdings Ordinary Shares by Non-EU nationals and the Company has Instituted a Ban on the Purchase of Ordinary Shares by Non-EU Nationals above.
The Companys Results of Operations May Fluctuate Significantly. The Companys results of operations have varied significantly from quarter to quarter, and management expects these variations to continue. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsSeasonal Fluctuations. Among the factors causing these variations are the airline industrys sensitivity to general economic conditions, the seasonal nature of air travel, and trends in airlines costs, especially fuel costs. Because a substantial portion of airline travel (both business and personal) is discretionary, the industry tends to experience adverse financial results during general economic downturns. The Company is substantially dependent on discretionary air travel.
21
The trading price of Ryanair Holdings Ordinary Shares and ADRs may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to quarterly variations in the Companys operating results and the operating results of other airlines. In addition, the global stock markets from time to time experience extreme price and volume fluctuations that affect the market prices of many airline company stocks. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the Ordinary Shares and ADRs.
Ryanair Holdings May or May Not Pay Dividends. Since its incorporation as the holding company for Ryanair in 1996, Ryanair Holdings has only occasionally declared special dividends on both its Ordinary Shares and ADRs. The directors of the Company declared on June 1, 2010 that Ryanair Holdings intended to pay a special dividend of approximately 500 million, and following shareholder approval at its annual general meeting on September 22, 2010 this special dividend was paid on October 1, 2010. Directors of the Company also declared on May 21, 2012 that Ryanair Holdings intended to pay a special dividend of 0.34 per ordinary share (approx. 492 million) and following shareholder approval at the annual general meeting on September 21, 2012 this special dividend was paid on November 30, 2012. The Company may pay other dividends from time to time. In June 2013, the Company detailed plans to return up to 1 billion to shareholders over the next two years. The Company completed 481.7 million in share buybacks in the fiscal year 2014 (including just over 6.0 million ADR buybacks) and indicated on May 19, 2014 that it plans to pay a special dividend of up to approximately 520 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, subject to shareholder approval at its annual general meeting on September 25, 2014. The Company has made no further commitments in relation to the payment of dividends, share buybacks or other shareholder distributions. See Item 8. Financial InformationOther Financial InformationDividend Policy. As a holding company, Ryanair Holdings does not have any material assets other than the shares of Ryanair.
Increased Costs for Possible Future ADR and Share Repurchases. In April 2012, the Company held an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) to authorize the directors to repurchase Ordinary Shares and ADRs for up to 5% of the issued share capital of the Company traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ). Up until April 2012, shareholders had only authorized the directors to repurchase Ordinary Shares. As the ADRs typically trade at a premium of 15% to 20% compared to Ordinary Shares, this may result in increased costs in performing share buy-backs in the future. In fiscal 2014, the Company bought back 6,018,800 ADRs for cancellation, which is equivalent to 30,094,000 Ordinary Shares, as part of its overall share buyback during fiscal year 2014 of 69.5 million Ordinary Shares. On June 20, 2013 the Company detailed plans to return up to 1 billion to shareholders over the next two years. The Company completed 481.7 million in share buybacks in the fiscal year 2014. On May 19, 2014 the Company indicated that it plans to pay a special dividend of up to approximately 520 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, subject to shareholder approval at its annual general meeting on September 25, 2014. However, there can be no assurance that such amount will be returned to shareholders, as the Companys plans are subject to shareholder approval, its continuing profitability, and the economic environment, as well as its obligations for capital expenditures and other commitments. The Company has made no further commitments in relation to the payment of dividends, share buybacks or other shareholder distributions.
22
Item 4. Information on the Company
Ryanair Holdings was incorporated in 1996 as a holding company for Ryanair Limited. The latter operates an ultra-low cost, scheduled-passenger airline serving short-haul, point-to-point routes between Ireland, the U.K., Continental Europe, and Morocco. Incorporated on November 28, 1984, Ryanair Limited began to introduce a low-fares operating model under a new management team in the early 1990s. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsHistory. As of June 30, 2014, Ryanair had a principal fleet of 297 Boeing 737-800 aircraft and 5 additional leased aircraft acquired on short term leases for the summer of 2014 to provide extra capacity, Ryanair Limited offered over 1,600 scheduled short-haul flights per day serving approximately 186 airports largely throughout Europe. See Route System, Scheduling and FaresRoute System and Scheduling for more details of Ryanairs route network. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsSeasonal Fluctuations for information about the seasonality of Ryanairs business.
Ryanair recorded a profit on ordinary activities after taxation of 522.8 million in the 2014 fiscal year, as compared to a profit on ordinary activities after taxation of 569.3 million in the 2013 fiscal year. This decrease of approximately 8% was primarily attributable to an increase in fuel costs of approximately 7% from 1,885.6 million to 2,013.1 million, and a reduction of approximately 4% in average fares, offset by strong ancillary revenues growth and increased traffic. Ryanair generated an average booked passenger load factor of approximately 83% in fiscal 2014, compared to 82% in fiscal 2013, and average booked passenger fare of 46.40 per passenger in the 2014 fiscal year, down from 48.20 in the prior fiscal year. The Company has focused on maintaining low operating costs (53.61 per passenger in the 2014 fiscal year, an increase from 52.56 in fiscal 2013).
The markets acceptance of Ryanairs low-fares service is reflected in the Ryanair EffectRyanairs history of stimulating significant annual passenger traffic growth on the new routes on which it has commenced service since 1991. For example, on the basis of the U.K. Airports Annual Statement of Movements, Passengers and Cargo published by the U.K. Civil Aviation Authority and statistics released by the International Civil Aviation Organization (the ICAO), the number of scheduled airline passengers traveling between Dublin and London increased from 1.7 million passengers in 1991 to 3.9 million passengers in the 2013 calendar year. Most international routes Ryanair has begun serving since 1991 have recorded significant traffic growth in the period following Ryanairs commencement of service, with Ryanair capturing the largest portion of such growth on each such route. A variety of factors contributed to this increase in air passenger traffic, including the relative strength of the Irish, U.K., and European economies in past years. However, management believes that the most significant factors driving such growth across all its European routes have been Ryanairs low-fares policy and its superiority to its competitors in terms of flight punctuality, levels of lost baggage, and rates of flight cancellations.
The address of Ryanair Holdings registered office is: c/o Ryanair Limited, Corporate Head Office, Airside Business Park, Swords, County Dublin, Ireland. The Companys contact person regarding this Annual Report on Form 20-F is: Howard Millar, Deputy Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer (same address as above). The telephone number is +353-1-945-1212 and the facsimile number is +353-1-945-1213. Under its current Articles, Ryanair Holdings has an unlimited corporate duration.
Ryanairs objective is to firmly establish itself as Europes biggest scheduled passenger airline, through continued improvements and expanded offerings of its low-fares service. In the highly challenging current operating environment, Ryanair seeks to offer low fares that generate increased passenger traffic while maintaining a continuous focus on cost-containment and operating efficiencies. The key elements of Ryanairs long-term strategy are:
Low Fares. Ryanairs low fares are designed to stimulate demand, particularly from fare-conscious leisure and business travelers who might otherwise use alternative forms of transportation or choose not to travel at all. Ryanair sells seats on a one-way basis, thus eliminating minimum stay requirements from all travel on Ryanair scheduled services. Ryanair sets fares on the basis of the demand for particular flights and by reference to the period
23
remaining to the date of departure of the flight, with higher fares typically charged on flights with higher levels of demand and for bookings made nearer to the date of departure. Ryanair also periodically runs special promotional fare campaigns. See Route System, Scheduling and FaresLow and Widely Available Fares below.
Customer Service. Ryanairs strategy is to deliver the best customer service performance in its peer group. According to the data available from the Association of European Airlines (AEA) and airlines own published statistics, Ryanair has achieved better punctuality, fewer lost bags, and fewer cancellations than its peer group in Europe. Ryanair achieves this by focusing strongly on the execution of these services and by primarily operating from un-congested airports. Ryanair conducts a daily conference call with airport personnel at each of its base airports, during which the reasons for each first wave flight delay and baggage short-shipment are discussed in detail and logged to ensure that the root cause is identified and rectified. Subsequent (consequential) delays and short shipments are investigated by Ryanair ground operations personnel. Customer satisfaction is also measured by regular online, mystery-passenger and by passenger surveys.
Ryanair is implementing a series of strategic initiatives that are expected to have a significant impact on its customer service offering. Ryanair has also announced and introduced a series of customer-service related initiatives, including a new, easier-to-navigate website with a fare finder facility, reduced penalty fees, allocated seating and more customer-friendly baggage allowances and change policies. Further, these initiatives include scheduling more flights to primary airports, selling flights via travel agents on GDS, increasing marketing spending significantly to support these initiatives, and adjusting the airlines yield management strategy with the goal of increasing load factors and yield.
Frequent Point-to-Point Flights on Short-Haul Routes. Ryanair provides frequent point-to-point service on short-haul routes to secondary, regional, and more recently, certain primary airports in and around major population centers and travel destinations. In the 2014 fiscal year, Ryanair flew an average route length of 788 miles and an average flight duration of approximately 1.87 hours. Short-haul routes allow Ryanair to offer its low fares and frequent service, while eliminating the need to provide unnecessary frills, like free in-flight meals and movies, otherwise expected by customers on longer flights. Point-to-point flying (as opposed to hub-and-spoke service) allows Ryanair to offer direct, non-stop routes and avoid the costs of providing through service, for connecting passengers, including baggage transfer and transit passenger assistance.
In choosing its routes, Ryanair primarily favors secondary airports with convenient transportation to major population centers and regional airports. Secondary and regional airports are generally less congested than major airports and, as a result, can be expected to provide higher rates of on-time departures, faster turnaround times (the time an aircraft spends at a gate loading and unloading passengers), fewer terminal delays, more competitive airport access, and lower handling costs. As part of its strategic initiatives, Ryanair plans to increase the number of primary airports that it serves, focussing particularly on those that facilitate a quick turnaround and offer opportunities for the Company to profitably enhance its route choice by adding city pairs that are attractive to both business and leisure customers alike. Ryanairs on time performance record (arrivals within 15 minutes of schedule) for the 2014 fiscal year was 92%. Faster turnaround times are a key element in Ryanairs efforts to maximize aircraft utilization. Ryanairs average scheduled turnaround time for the 2014 fiscal year was approximately 25 minutes.
Low Operating Costs. Management believes that Ryanairs operating costs are among the lowest of any European scheduled-passenger airline. Ryanair strives to reduce or control four of the primary expenses involved in running a major scheduled airline: (i) aircraft equipment costs; (ii) personnel costs; (iii) customer service costs; and (iv) airport access and handling costs:
Aircraft Equipment Costs. Ryanairs primary strategy for controlling aircraft acquisition costs is focused on operating a single aircraft type. Ryanair currently operates only next generation Boeing 737-800s. Ryanairs continuous acquisition of new Boeing 737-800s has already and is expected, through the end of fiscal 2019, to increase the size of its fleet and thus increase its aircraft equipment and related costs (on an aggregate basis). However, the purchase of aircraft from a single manufacturer enables Ryanair to limit the costs associated with personnel training, maintenance, and the purchase and storage of spare parts while also affording the Company greater flexibility in the scheduling of crews and equipment. Management also believes that the terms of Ryanairs contracts with Boeing are very favorable to Ryanair. See Aircraft below for additional information on Ryanairs fleet.
24
Personnel Costs. Ryanair endeavors to control its labor costs by seeking to continually improve the productivity of its already highly productive work force. Compensation for personnel emphasizes productivity-based pay incentives. These incentives include sales bonus payments for onboard sales of products for flight attendants and payments based on the number of hours or sectors flown by pilots and flight attendants within limits set by industry standards or regulations fixing maximum working hours.
Customer Service Costs. Ryanair has entered into agreements on competitive terms with external contractors at certain airports for ticketing, passenger and aircraft handling, and other services that management believes can be more cost-efficiently provided by third parties. Management attempts to obtain competitive rates for such services by negotiating fixed-price, multi-year contracts. The development of its own Internet booking facility has allowed Ryanair to eliminate travel agent commissions. As part of its strategic initiatives, the Company has broadened its distribution base by making Ryanairs fares available to Travelport (Galileo and Worldspan) at nominal cost to the Company. Ryanair generates over 99% of its scheduled passenger revenues through direct sales via its website.
Airport Access and Handling Costs. Ryanair attempts to control airport access and service charges by focusing on airports that offer competitive prices. Management believes that Ryanairs record of delivering a consistently high volume of passenger traffic growth at many airports has allowed it to negotiate favorable contracts with such airports for access to their facilities, although the recent change in strategy by the Company may see it access some more primary airports, which typically have higher airport charges and greater competition along with slot limitations. Secondary and regional airports also generally do not have slot requirements or other operating restrictions that can increase operating expenses and limit the number of allowed take-offs and landings. Ryanair further endeavors to reduce its airport charges by opting, when practicable, for less expensive gate locations as well as outdoor boarding stairs, rather than jetways, which are more expensive and operationally less efficient to use. In addition, since October 2009, Ryanair has required all passengers to check-in on the Internet. This requirement was instituted to reduce waiting times at airports and speed a passengers journey from arrival at the airport to boarding, as well as significantly reduce airport handling costs. Ryanair has also introduced a checked-bag fee, which is payable on the Internet at the time of booking and is aimed at reducing the number of bags carried by passengers in order to further reduce handling costs. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyThe Company Faces Risks Related to its Internet Reservations Operations and its Announced Elimination of Airport Check-in Facilities.
Taking Advantage of the Internet. In 2000, Ryanair converted its host reservation system to a new system, which it operates under a hosting agreement with Navitaire that was extended in 2011 and will terminate in 2020. As part of the implementation of the reservation system, Navitaire developed an Internet booking facility. The Ryanair system allows Internet users to access its host reservation system and to make and pay for confirmed reservations in real time through the Ryanair.com website. After the launch of the Internet reservation system, Ryanair heavily promoted its website through newspaper, radio and television advertising. As a result, Internet bookings grew rapidly, and have accounted for over 99% of all reservations over the past several years. In May 2012, Ryanair further upgraded the reservation system, which offers more flexibility for future system enhancements and to accommodate the future growth of Ryanair. In November 2013, Ryanair re-launched its website in a new, easier to use, format that reduced the booking process from 17 to 5 clicks. Various other initiatives were also introduced, including a fare finder facility which enables customers to easily find the lowest fares. The new My Ryanair registration services, which allows customers to securely store their personal and payment details, has also significantly quickened the booking process and made it easier for customers to book a flight. The Company also launched a new mobile app on July 15, 2014, which will make it simpler and easier for customers to book Ryanair flights.
Commitment to Safety and Quality Maintenance. Safety is the primary priority of Ryanair and its management. This commitment begins with the hiring and training of Ryanairs pilots, flight attendants, and maintenance personnel and includes a policy of maintaining its aircraft in accordance with the highest European airline industry standards. Ryanair has not had a single passenger or flight crew fatality as a result of an accident with one of its aircraft in its 30-year operating history. Although Ryanair seeks to maintain its fleet in a cost-effective manner, management does not seek to extend Ryanairs low-cost operating strategy to the areas of safety, maintenance, training or quality assurance. Routine aircraft maintenance and repair services are performed primarily
25
by Ryanair, at Ryanairs main bases, but are also performed at other base airports by maintenance contractors approved under the terms of a European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Part 145 approval. Ryanair currently performs heavy airframe maintenance, but contracts with other parties who perform engine overhaul services and rotable repairs. These contractors also provide similar services to a number of other airlines, including Southwest Airlines, British Airways, Air France and Alitalia.
Enhancement of Operating Results through Ancillary Services. Ryanair distributes accommodation services and travel insurance primarily through its website. For hotel services, Ryanair has a contract with Hotelscombined PTY Ltd, and they provide a hotel comparison website to Ryanair which generates commissions for Ryanair on the number of bookings made. Ryanair also has a contract with Bookings.com to market hotels during the website booking process. In addition, Ryanair has a contract with the Hertz Corporation (Hertz), pursuant to which Hertz handles all car rental services marketed through Ryanairs website or telephone reservation system. Ryanair also sells bus and some rail tickets onboard its aircraft and through its website. For the 2014 fiscal year, ancillary services accounted for approximately 25% of Ryanairs total operating revenues, as compared to approximately 22% of such revenues in the 2013 fiscal year. See Ancillary Services below and Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsResults of OperationsFiscal Year 2014 Compared with Fiscal Year 2013Ancillary Revenues for additional information.
Focused Criteria for Growth. Building on its success in the Ireland-U.K. market and its expansion of service to continental Europe and Morocco, Ryanair intends to follow a manageable growth plan targeting specific markets. Ryanair believes it will have opportunities for continued growth by: (i) using aggressive fare promotions to increase load factors; (ii) initiating additional routes in the EU; (iii) initiating additional routes in countries party to a European Common Aviation Agreement with the EU that are currently served by higher-cost, higher-fare carriers; (iv) increasing the frequency of service on its existing routes; (v) starting new domestic routes within individual EU countries; (vi) considering acquisition opportunities that may become available in the future; (vii) connecting airports within its existing route network (triangulation); (viii) establishing new bases; and (ix) initiating new routes not currently served by any carrier.
Responding to Current Challenges. In recent periods, and with increased effect in the 2012, 2013 and 2014 fiscal years, Ryanairs low-fares business model has faced substantial pressure due to significantly increased fuel costs and reduced economic growth (or economic contraction) in some of the economies in which it operates. The Company has aimed to meet these challenges by: (i) grounding (approximately 70 in fiscal 2014 and 80 in fiscal 2013) aircraft during the winter season; (ii) disposing of aircraft (lease hand backs totaled four in the 2013 fiscal year and eight in the 2014 fiscal year); (iii) controlling labor and other costs, including through wage freezes for non-flight crew personnel in fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2013, selective redundancies and the introduction of Internet check-in in fiscal 2010; and (iv) renegotiating contracts with existing suppliers, airports and handling companies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in achieving all of the foregoing or taking other similar measures, or that doing so will allow the Company to earn profits in any period. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyChanges in Fuel Costs and Fuel Availability Affect the Companys Results and Increase the Likelihood of Adverse Impact to the Companys Profitability and The Company May Not Be Successful in Increasing Fares and Revenues to Cover Rising Business Costs.
In recent years, in response to an operating environment characterized by high fuel prices, typically lower seasonal yields and higher airport charges and/or taxes, Ryanair has adopted a policy of grounding a certain portion of its fleet during the winter months (from November to March inclusive). In the winter months of fiscal 2014, Ryanair grounded approximately 70 aircraft and the Company announced in May 2014 that it intends to ground approximately 50 aircraft during the winter months of fiscal 2015. While seasonal grounding does reduce the Companys operating costs, it also decreases Ryanairs potential to record both flight and non-flight revenues. Decreasing the number and frequency of flights may also negatively affect the Companys labor relations, including its ability to attract flight personnel interested in full-time employment. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRyanair has Decided to Seasonally Ground Aircraft.
26
ROUTE SYSTEM, SCHEDULING AND FARES
Route System and Scheduling
As of July 25, 2014, the Company offered over 1,600 scheduled short-haul flights per day serving approximately 186 airports largely throughout Europe, and flying approximately 1,600 routes. The following table lists Ryanairs operating bases:
Operating Bases | ||||
Alghero Alicante Athens Baden-Baden Barcelona (Girona) Barcelona (El Prat) Bari Billund Bologna Bournemouth Birmingham Bremen Brindisi Bristol Brussels (Charleroi) Brussels (Zaventem) Budapest Cagliari Catania Chania Cologne (a) Cork Dublin |
Dusseldorf (Weeze) East Midlands Edinburgh Eindhoven Faro Fez Frankfurt (Hahn) Gdansk (a) Glasgow (Prestwick) Glasgow International (b) Gran Canaria Kaunas Krakow Lamezia Lanzarote Leeds Bradford Lisbon Liverpool London (Luton) London (Stansted) Madrid Malaga Malta |
Manchester Marrakech Marseilles Milan (Bergamo) Palermo Palma Mallorca Paphos Pescara Pisa Porto Oslo (Rygge) Rome (Ciampino) Rome (Fiumicino) Seville Shannon Stockholm (Skavsta) Tenerife South Thessaloniki Trapani Valencia Warsaw (Modlin) (a) Wroclaw Zadar |
(a) | In April 2014, Ryanair announced that it would open bases in Cologne, Gdansk and Warsaw Modlin. |
(b) | In July 2014, Ryanair announced that it would operate a base in Glasgow International Airport. |
See Note 17, Analysis of operating revenues and segmental analysis, to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 for more information regarding the geographical sources of the Companys revenue.
Managements objective is to schedule a sufficient number of flights per day on each of Ryanairs routes to satisfy demand for Ryanairs low-fares service. Ryanair schedules departures on its most popular routes at frequent intervals; normally between approximately 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. Management regularly reviews the need for adjustments in the number of flights on all of its routes.
During the 2014 fiscal year, Ryanair opened 121 new routes across its network. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyRyanairs New Routes and Expanded Operations May Have an Adverse Financial Impact on Its Results.
27
Low and Widely Available Fares
Ryanair offers low fares, with prices generally varying on the basis of advance booking, seat availability and demand. Ryanair sells seats on a one-way basis, thus removing minimum stay requirements from all travel on Ryanair scheduled services. All tickets can be changed, subject to certain conditions, including fee payment and applicable upgrade charges. However, tickets are generally non-cancelable and non-refundable and must be paid for at the time of reservation.
Ryanairs discounted fares are capacity controlled in that Ryanair allocates a specific number of seats on each flight to each fare category to accommodate projected demand for seats at each fare level leading up to flight time. Ryanair generally makes its lowest fares widely available by allocating a majority of its seat inventory to its lowest fare categories. Management believes that its unrestricted fares as well as its advance-purchase fares are attractive to both business and leisure travelers.
When launching a new route, Ryanairs policy is to price its lowest fare so that it will be significantly lower than other carriers lowest fares, but still provide a satisfactory operating margin.
Ryanair also periodically runs special promotional fare campaigns, in particular in connection with the opening of new routes, and endeavors to always offer the lowest fare on any route it serves. Promotional fares may have the effect of increasing load factors and reducing Ryanairs yield and passenger revenues on the relevant routes during the periods they are in effect. Ryanair expects to continue to offer significant fare promotions to stimulate demand in periods of lower activity or during off-peak times for the foreseeable future.
Ryanairs primary marketing strategy is to emphasize its widely available low fares, route choice and great service. In doing so, Ryanair primarily advertises its services in national and regional media across Europe. In addition, we use topical advertising, social media, press conferences and publicity stunts. Other marketing activities include the distribution of advertising and promotional material and cooperative advertising campaigns with other travel-related entities, including local tourist boards. Ryanair also regularly contacts people registered in its database to inform them about promotions and special offers.
Passenger airlines generally rely on travel agents (whether traditional or online) for a significant portion of their ticket sales and pay travel agents commissions for their services, as well as reimbursing them for the fees charged by reservation systems providers. In contrast, Ryanair requires passengers to make reservations and purchase tickets directly through the Company. Currently, over 99% of such reservations and purchases are made through the website Ryanair.com. Ryanair is therefore not reliant on travel agents. See StrategyTaking Advantage of the Internet above for additional information.
In May 2012, Ryanair further upgraded its reservation system in order to facilitate the continued expansion of the airline. The upgraded system gives the Company the ability to offer more enhancements to passengers, as the new platform is far more flexible in terms of future development. Under the agreement with the system provider, Navitaire, the system serves as Ryanairs core seating inventory and booking system. In return for access to these system functions, Ryanair pays transaction fees that are generally based on the number of passenger seat journeys booked through the system. Navitaire also retains a back-up booking engine to support operations in the event of a breakdown in the main system. Over the last several years, Ryanair has introduced a number of Internet-based customer service enhancements such as Internet check-in, priority boarding service and limited reserved seating since January 2012. Since October 2009, Ryanair has required Internet check-in for all passengers. These enhancements and changes have been made to reduce waiting time at airports and speed a passengers journey from arrival at the airport to boarding, as well as significantly reduce airport handling costs. Ryanair has also introduced a checked-bag fee, which is payable on the Internet and is aimed at reducing the number of bags carried by passengers in order to further reduce handling costs. On April 1, 2014, the Company entered an agreement with Travelport who operate the Galileo and Worldspan GDS. The Companys fares (except for the three lowest fare categories) will be
28
distributed on the Galileo and Worldspan systems. Ryanair has negotiated an attractive per segment price and expects to sell tickets via travel agents at no commission to a mix of largely business/corporate travelers. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyRyanair Faces Risks Related to Unauthorized Use of Information from the Companys Website.
Aircraft
As of June 30, 2014, Ryanair had a principal fleet of 297 Boeing 737-800 aircraft and 5 additional leased aircraft acquired on short term leases for the summer of 2014 to provide extra capacity. The principal fleet was composed of 297 Boeing 737-800 next generation aircraft, each having 189 seats. Ryanairs fleet totaled 297 Boeing 737-800s at March 31, 2014. The Company expects to have an operating fleet comprising approximately 426 Boeing 737-800s at March 31, 2019 depending on the level of lease returns/disposals.
Between March 1999 and March 2014, Ryanair took delivery of 348 new Boeing 737-800 next generation aircraft under its contracts with Boeing and disposed of 51 such aircraft, including 25 lease handbacks.
Under the terms of the 2013 Boeing Contract, Ryanair has agreed to purchase the 180 new aircraft over a five year period from fiscal 2015 to 2019, with delivery beginning in September 2014. The new aircraft will benefit from a net effective price not dissimilar to that under the 2005 Boeing Contract which was approved by shareholders in 2005 and will be used on new and existing routes to grow Ryanairs business.
The Boeing 737-800 represents the current generation of Boeings 737 aircraft. It is a short-to-medium range aircraft and seats 189 passengers. The basic price (equivalent to a standard list price for an aircraft of this type) for each of the Boeing 737-800 series aircraft is approximately US$78.1 million and the basic price will be increased for certain buyer-furnished equipment, amounting to approximately US$2.9 million per new aircraft, which Ryanair has asked Boeing to purchase and install on each of the new aircraft. In addition, an Escalation Factor will be applied to the basic price to reflect increases in the Employment Cost Index and Producer Price Index between the time the basic price was set in the 2013 Boeing Contract and the period 18 to 24 months prior to the delivery of any such new aircraft.
Boeing has granted Ryanair certain price concessions as part of the 2013 Boeing Contract. These will take the form of credit memoranda to Ryanair for the amount of such concessions, which Ryanair may apply toward the purchase of goods and services from Boeing or toward certain payments, other than advance payments, in respect of the new aircraft. Boeing and CFMI (the manufacturer of the engines to be fitted on the new aircraft) have also agreed to provide Ryanair with certain allowances for promotional and other activities, as well as providing certain other goods and services to Ryanair on concessionary terms. Those credit memoranda and promotional allowances will effectively reduce the price of each new aircraft payable by Ryanair. As a result, the effective price (the purchase price of the new aircraft net of discounts received from Boeing) of each new aircraft will be significantly below the basic price mentioned above. The effective price applies to all new aircraft due for delivery from September 2014.
For additional details on the Boeing contracts, scheduled aircraft deliveries and related expenditures and their financing, as well as the terms of the arrangements under which Ryanair currently leases 51 of the aircraft in its operating fleet, see Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsLiquidity and Capital Resources.
The Boeing 737 is the worlds most widely used commercial aircraft and exists in a number of generations, the Boeing 737-800s being the most recent. Management believes that spare parts and cockpit crews qualified to fly these aircraft are likely to be more widely available on favorable terms than similar resources for other types of aircraft. Management believes that its strategy, to date, of having reduced its fleet to one aircraft type enables Ryanair to limit the costs associated with personnel training, the purchase and storage of spare parts, and maintenance. Furthermore, this strategy affords Ryanair greater flexibility in the scheduling of crews and equipment. The Boeing 737-800s are fitted with CFM 56-7B engines and have advanced CAT III Autoland capability, advanced traffic collision avoidance systems, and enhanced ground-proximity warning systems. During fiscal 2012, Boeing
29
announced that it was going to manufacture a variant of the 737 with new, more fuel-efficient engines called the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft. A senior Ryanair working group is continuing to evaluate the benefits of the MAX aircraft. This new variant could impact the Company insofar as the residual value of its aircraft could be reduced when this new variant enters production, currently expected to be in late 2017.
At March 31, 2014, the average aircraft age of the Companys Boeing 737-800 fleet was just over 5.5 years.
Training and Regulatory Compliance
Ryanair currently owns and operates four Boeing 737-800 full flight simulators for pilot training, the first of which was delivered in 2002. The simulators were purchased from CAE Electronics Ltd. of Quebec, Canada (CAE). The second simulator was delivered in 2004, while the third and fourth simulators were delivered in the 2008 fiscal year. In September 2006, Ryanair entered into a new contract with CAE to purchase B737NG Level B flight simulators. Two such simulators were delivered in the 2009 fiscal year.
Management believes that Ryanair is currently in compliance with all applicable regulations and EU directives concerning its fleet of Boeing 737-800 aircraft and will comply with any regulations or EU directives that may come into effect in the future. However, there can be no assurance that the FAA or other regulatory authorities will not recommend or require other safety-related undertakings that could adversely impact the Companys results of operations or financial condition. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsSafety-Related Undertakings Could Affect the Companys Results.
Ryanair provides various ancillary services and engages in other activities connected with its core air passenger service, including non-flight scheduled services, Internet-related services, and the in-flight sale of beverages, food, and merchandise. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsResults of OperationsFiscal Year 2014 Compared with Fiscal Year 2013Ancillary Revenues for additional information.
As part of its non-flight scheduled and Internet-related services, Ryanair incentivizes ground service providers at many of the airports it serves to levy correct excess baggage charges for any baggage that exceeds Ryanairs published baggage allowances and to collect these charges in accordance with Ryanairs standard terms and conditions. Excess baggage charges are recorded as non-flight scheduled revenue.
Ryanair primarily markets accommodation services and travel insurance through its website. For hotel and accommodation services, Ryanair has a contract with Hotelscombined PTY Ltd. (Hotelscombined), which operates a price comparison website, pursuant to which Hotelscombined handles all aspects of such services marketed through Ryanairs website and pays a fee to Ryanair. Ryanair also has a contract with Bookings.com to market hotels during the booking process on its website and Ryanair receives a commission on these sales. In addition, Ryanair has a contract with Hertz, pursuant to which Hertz handles all car rental services marketed through Ryanairs website or telephone reservation system.
Ryanair also sells bus and some rail tickets onboard its aircraft and through its website. In addition, Ryanair markets car parking, attractions and activities on its website, with the latter having gone on sale in-flight in spring 2012.
Ryanair sells gift vouchers on its website, which are redeemable online. In May 2009, Ryanair started to offer its passengers the possibility of receiving an SMS (text message) when booking, at a modest fee, to inform them of their flight confirmation details.
In April 2009, Ryanair signed a contract with Webloyalty International Ltd, which offers Ryanairs customers who have a UK, German or French billing address a retail discount and cash-back program. A similar contract was signed in 2013 with LEV-8 for customers with billing addresses in Norway, Poland, Portugal and Sweden. In April 2011, Ryanair began to sell advertising on its boarding cards. In fiscal 2012, a boarding card redesign along with increased passenger volumes allowed for further growth in this area.
30
In fiscal year 2012, Ryanair rolled out handheld Electronic Point of Sale (EPOS) devices across its route network. These EPOS devices replaced manual and paper based systems on board the aircraft. The EPOS device enables cabin crew to sell and record their on-board sales transactions more efficiently and generate vastly improved management sales reporting. The EPOS device also issues bus and rail tickets and tickets for tourist attractions.
In fiscal year 2011, Ryanair began offering reserved seating in twenty-one extra legroom seats on each aircraft for a fee on certain routes and this feature was rolled out to all routes in fiscal year 2012. In February 2014, Ryanair introduced fully allocated seating on each of its flights. Passengers can pay a fee of 10 for seats located at the front of the aircraft, at the overwing exits and at the two rear rows of the aircraft. All other seats can be reserved for a fee of 5. In the event a passenger does not wish to purchase an allocated seat, a random seat will be allocated during the booking process.
In November 2013, the Company launched a new website which reduced the number of clicks to make a booking from 17 to 5. At the same time, the Company reduced the exposure of certain other ancillary products during the booking process on the website which had a negative impact on sales along with a reduction of certain penalty fees and charges at airports. The Company anticipates that the reduction in revenues arising from these changes will be offset by the increased revenues arising from allocated seating. See Item 3 Key InformationRisk FactorsRyanair May Not Achieve All of the Expected Benefits of its Recent Strategic Initiatives.
General
As part of its commitment to safety, Ryanair endeavors to hire qualified maintenance personnel, provide proper training to such personnel, and maintain its aircraft in accordance with European industry standards. While Ryanair seeks to maintain its fleet in a cost-effective manner, management does not seek to extend Ryanairs low-cost operating strategy to the areas of maintenance, training or quality control.
Ryanairs quality assurance department deals with oversight of all maintenance activities in accordance with Part 145. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which established Part 145, came into being on September 28, 2003; through the adoption of Regulation (EC) No. 1592/2002 of the European Parliament, and its standards superseded the previous Joint Aviation Authority (JAA) requirements. See Government RegulationRegulatory Authorities.
Ryanair is itself an EASA Part 145-approved maintenance contractor and provides its own routine aircraft maintenance and repair services. Ryanair also performs certain checks on its aircraft, including pre-flight, daily, and transit checks at some of its bases, as well as A-checks at its Dublin, London (Stansted), Glasgow (Prestwick), Bremen and Frankfurt (Hahn) facilities. Since December 2003, Ryanair has operated a hangar facility at its base at Glasgow (Prestwick) in Scotland, where both A-checks and C-checks are performed on the fleet of Boeing 737-800 aircraft. The facility performs up to four C-checks per week and Ryanair has recently opened a new C-check hangar facility in Kaunas, Lithuania where it carries out between one and two light C-checks per week, enabling Ryanair to perform all of the heavy maintenance that is currently required on its Boeing 737-800 fleet in-house. In January 2014, Ryanair opened another single bay hangar facility in Kaunas.
Ryanair opened a five-bay hangar and stores facility at its London (Stansted) airport base in October 2008 to allow Ryanair to carry out additional line maintenance on its expanding fleet. This facility also incorporates two flight simulator devices with space and provisions for two more, together with a cabin crew trainer and associated training rooms. Ryanair has completed the building of a separate training facility adjacent to the hangar to accommodate a full size 737NG training aircraft to allow for cabin crew and engineering training. Ryanair carries out A-checks and line maintenance in its single-bay aircraft hangar facility in Bremen. Ryanair has also entered into a 30-year sole-tenancy agreement with Frankfurt (Hahn) airport and has taken acceptance of a two-bay hangar and stores facility that also incorporates a two-bay simulator-training center. This facility was completed in January 2011 and allows Ryanair to carry out additional line maintenance including A-checks.
31
Maintenance and repair services that may become necessary while an aircraft is located at some of the other airports served by Ryanair are provided by other Part 145-approved contract maintenance providers. Aircraft return each evening to Ryanairs bases, where they are examined by either Ryanairs approved engineers or by local Part 145-approved companies.
Heavy Maintenance
As noted above, Ryanair currently has sufficient capacity to be able to carry out all of the routine maintenance work required on its Boeing 737-800 fleet itself. Ryanair opened a new three-bay maintenance hangar at Glasgow (Prestwick) airport in winter 2010 to accommodate the additional maintenance requirements arising from its expanding and aging fleet and opened a new C-check facility in Kaunas in January 2013 to carry out light C-checks.
Ryanair contracts out engine overhaul service for its Boeing 737-800 aircraft to General Electric Engine Services pursuant to a 10-year agreement with an option for a 10-year extension, which was signed in 2004 and subsequently extended for three years to November 30, 2017. This comprehensive maintenance contract provides for the repair and overhaul of the CFM56-7B series engines fitted to the first 155 of Ryanairs Boeing 737-800 aircraft, the repair of parts and general technical support for the fleet of engines. On June 30, 2008, the Company finalized a contract for a similar level of coverage and support for the engines on all of its aircraft that have been or were scheduled to be delivered over the period through November 2012. Due to the fact that engines on recently delivered aircraft will not require a scheduled engine overhaul prior to the expiry of the current contract with GE, Ryanair has decided, at this time, not to take up its option to have engines delivered with aircraft after October 2010 covered by this contract. General Electric Engine Services mainly uses its Part 145-approved repair facility in Cardiff, Wales for this work, but also uses the KLM Part 145-approved facility in Amsterdam, and its Part 145-approved facility in Celma, Brazil. By contracting with experienced Part 145-approved maintenance providers, management believes it is better able to ensure the quality of its aircraft and engine maintenance. Ryanair assigns a Part 145-certified mechanic to oversee all heavy maintenance and to authorize all engine overhauls performed by third parties. Maintenance providers are also monitored closely by the national authorities under EASA and national regulations.
Ryanair expects to be dependent on external service contractors, particularly for engine and component maintenance, for the foreseeable future, notwithstanding the additional capabilities provided by its maintenance facilities at Dublin, Glasgow (Prestwick), London (Stansted), Frankfurt (Hahn) and Kaunas. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyThe Company Is Dependent on External Service Providers.
Ryanair has not had a single passenger or flight crew fatality in its 30-year operating history. Ryanair demonstrates its commitment to safe operations through its safety training procedures, its investment in safety-related equipment, and its adoption of an internal open and confidential reporting system for safety issues. The Companys Board of Directors also has an air safety committee to review and discuss air safety and related issues. Michael Horgan, a Company director, is the chairman of this committee and reports to the Board of Directors.
Ryanairs flight training is oriented towards accident prevention and covers all aspects of flight operations. Threat and Error Management (TEM) is at the core of all flight crew training programs. Ryanair maintains full control of the content and delivery of all of its flight crew training, including initial, recurrent, and upgrade phases. All training programs are approved by the Irish Aviation Authority (the IAA), which regularly audits operation control standards and flight crew training standards for compliance with EU legislation.
All of the Boeing 737-800s that Ryanair has bought or committed to buy are certified for Category IIIA landings (automatic landings with minimum horizontal visibility of 200 meters and a 50 feet decision height).
Ryanair has a comprehensive and documented safety management system. Management encourages flight crews to report any safety-related issues through the Safety Alert Initial Report reporting program or to use the
32
confidential reporting system, which is available online through Ryanairs Crewdock system. The confidential reporting system affords flight crews the opportunity to report directly to the Flight Safety Officer any event, error, or discrepancy in flight operations that they do not wish to report through standard reporting channels. The confidential reporting system is designed to increase managements awareness of problems that may be encountered by flight crews in their day-to-day operations. Management uses the information reported through all reporting systems to modify operating procedures and improve flight operation standards. Additionally, Ryanair promotes the use of CHIRP, a confidential reporting system that is endorsed by the UK CAA as an alternative confidential reporting channel.
Ryanair has installed an automatic data capturing system on each of its Boeing 737-800 aircraft which captures and downloads aircraft performance information for use as part of Operational Flight Data Monitoring (OFDM) which automatically provides a confidential report on variations from normal operating limitations detected during the course of each flight. The purpose of this system is to monitor operational trends and inform management of any instance of an operational limit being exceeded. By analyzing these reports, management is able to identify undesirable trends and potential areas of operational risk, so as to take steps to rectify such deviations, thereby ensuring adherence to Ryanairs flight safety standards.
In November 2008, a Ryanair aircraft suffered a multiple bird strike during its final approach to Rome (Ciampino) airport. This incident caused substantial damage to the aircraft, which resulted in an insurance claim being filed in respect of this aircraft. The damage that it suffered was such that the aircraft was not repaired, although Ryanair has retained ownership of it for certain parts and for training purposes.
Airport Handling Services
Ryanair provides its own aircraft and passenger handling and ticketing services at Dublin Airport. Third parties provide these services to Ryanair at most other airports it serves. Servisair plc provides Ryanairs ticketing, passenger and aircraft handling, and ground handling services at many of these airports in Ireland and the U.K. (excluding London (Stansted) Airport where these services are provided primarily by Swissport Ltd.), while similar services in continental Europe are generally provided by the local airport authorities, either directly or through sub-contractors. Management attempts to obtain competitive rates for such services by negotiating multi-year contracts at fixed prices. These contracts are generally scheduled to expire in one to five years, unless renewed, and certain of them may be terminated by either party before their expiry upon prior notice. Ryanair will need to enter into similar agreements in any new markets it may enter. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyThe Company Is Dependent on External Service Providers.
During 2009, Ryanair introduced Internet check-in for all passengers and also introduced kiosks at certain airports for the provision of other services. The Company has these kiosks in operation at many of its key bases.
Airport Charges
As with other airlines, Ryanair must pay airport charges each time it lands and accesses facilities at the airports it serves. Depending on the policy of the individual airport, such charges can include landing fees, passenger loading fees, security fees and parking fees. Ryanair attempts to negotiate discounted fees by delivering annual increases in passenger traffic, and opts, when practicable, for less expensive facilities, such as less convenient gates and the use of outdoor boarding stairs rather than more expensive jetways. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the airports Ryanair uses will not impose higher airport charges in the future and that any such increases would not adversely affect the Companys operations.
As a result of rising airport charges and the introduction of an Air Travel Tax of 10 on passengers departing from Irish airports on routes longer than 300 kilometers from Dublin Airport (2 on shorter routes), Ryanair reduced its fleet at Dublin airport to 13 during winter 2010 (down from 22 in summer 2008 and 20 in winter 2008). The introduction of the aforementioned 10 tax likely had a negative impact on the number of passengers traveling to and from Ireland. The Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) reported that passenger volumes declined by
33
25% from 30 million in 2007 to 23 million in 2012. Ryanair believes that this is partly reflective of the negative impact of the tax on Irish travel. Ryanair called for the elimination of the tax to stimulate tourism during the recession. Ryanair also complained to the European Commission about the unlawful differentiation in the level of the Irish Air Travel tax between routes within the EU. From April 2011, a single rate (3) of the Air Travel Tax was introduced on all routes. In May 2011, the Irish Government announced that it would abolish the Air Travel Tax, and the tax was ultimately abolished on April 1, 2014. No assurance can be given that the tax will not be reintroduced in the future at similar levels or higher levels, which could have a negative impact on demand for air travel.
The Greek government planned to introduce similar taxes; however, it has now cancelled plans to introduce these taxes. The German government introduced an 8 passenger tax on January 1, 2011 for all departing domestic or short-haul passengers and a passenger tax of 25 for all departing passengers on flights bound for southern Europe and northern Africa. The 8 tax was reduced to 7.50 in January 2012. In addition, the Austrian government introduced an ecological air travel levy of 8 effective January 1, 2011. In July 2013, the regional Walloon Government in Belgium announced a 3 passenger travel tax from January 2014. However, the plan to introduce this tax was later abandoned. The Moroccan government has also introduced a similar tax (equivalent to approximately 9) from April 2014.
In March 2007, the discount arrangement formerly in place at London (Stansted) airport terminated, subjecting Ryanair to an average increase in charges of approximately 100%. The increase in these charges, which was passed on in the form of higher ticket prices, had a negative impact on yields and passenger volumes in the winter, resulting in Ryanairs decision to ground seven aircraft. Ryanair responded to the increases by filing complaints with the U.K. Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and the Competition Commission, calling for the break-up of the British Airports Authority plc (BAA) monopoly and the introduction of competition in the London airports market. The OFT referred the matter to the Competition Commission, which found that the common ownership by BAA of the three main airports in London negatively affected competition and that a light touch approach to regulating BAA by the Civil Aviation Authority adversely impacted competition. In March 2009, the Competition Commission ordered the break-up of BAA. In October 2009, London (Gatwick) was sold to Global Infrastructure Partners for £1.5 billion. Following a delay caused by various appeals by the BAA, the BAA proceeded to sell Edinburgh Airport in April 2012, and Stansted airport to Manchester Airports Group plc in March 2013. Following the December 2003 publication of the U.K. governments White Paper on Airport Capacity in the Southeast of England, the BAA in 2004 announced plans to spend up to £4 billion on a multi-year project to construct a second runway and additional terminal facilities at London (Stansted) airport with a target opening date of 2013. Ryanair and other airlines using London (Stansted) support the principle of a second runway at London (Stansted), but are opposed to this development because they believe that the financing of what they consider to be an overblown project will lead to airport costs approximately doubling from current levels. In May 2010 the BAA announced that it would not proceed with this £4 billion program. On January 10, 2014, the UK Civil Aviation Authority completed its regulatory investigation into market power determination for passenger airlines in relation to London (Stansted). It found that London (Stansted) did not enjoy substantial market power in the market for the provision of airport operation services to passenger airlines, and as such declined to continue to regulate the airport. On September 16, 2013, Ryanair announced that it had agreed a 10 year growth agreement with Manchester Airports Group plc, the owners of London (Stansted), in relation to an expansion of capacity at London (Stansted) in return for significant airport charge reductions for the incremental passenger volumes delivered. Once this 10 year growth deal expires, Ryanair may be subject to increased airport charges at London (Stansted) as the airport is no longer subject to regulation.
See Item 3. Risk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyRyanairs Continued Growth is Dependent on Access to Suitable Airports; Charges for Airport Access are Subject to Increase. See also Item 8. Financial InformationOther Financial InformationLegal ProceedingsEU State Aid-Related Proceedings for information regarding legal proceedings in which Ryanairs economic arrangements with several publicly owned airports are being contested.
34
The cost of jet fuel accounted for approximately 46% and 45% of Ryanairs total operating expenses in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively (in each case, this accounts for costs after giving effect to the Companys fuel hedging activities but excludes de-icing costs, which accounted for approximately 0.3% and 1.0% of total fuel costs in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively). The future availability and cost of jet fuel cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty, and Ryanairs low-fares policy limits its ability to pass on increased fuel costs to passengers through increased fares. Jet fuel prices are dependent on crude oil prices, which are quoted in U.S. dollars. If the value of the U.S. dollar strengthens against the euro, Ryanairs fuel costs, expressed in euro, may increase even absent any increase in the U.S. dollar price of jet fuel. Ryanair has also entered into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge against some currency fluctuations. See Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskForeign Currency Exposure and Hedging.
Ryanair has historically entered into arrangements providing for substantial protection against fluctuations in fuel prices, generally through forward contracts covering periods of up to 18 months of anticipated jet fuel requirements. As of July 25 2014, Ryanair had entered into forward jet fuel (jet kerosene) contracts covering approximately 90% of its estimated requirements for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015 at prices equivalent to approximately $950 per metric ton. In addition, as of July 25, 2014, Ryanair had entered into forward jet fuel (jet kerosene) contracts covering approximately 55% of its estimated requirements for the first half of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016 at prices equivalent to approximately $950 per metric ton, and had not entered into any jet fuel hedging contracts with respect to its expected fuel purchases beyond that period. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyChanges in Fuel Costs and Fuel Availability Affect the Companys Results and Increase the Likelihood of Adverse Impact to the Companys Profitability and Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskFuel Price Exposure and Hedging for additional information on recent trends in fuel costs and the Companys related hedging activities, as well as certain associated risks. See also Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsFiscal Year 2014 Compared with Fiscal Year 2013Fuel and Oil.
Ryanair is exposed to potential catastrophic losses that may be incurred in the event of an aircraft accident or terrorist incident. Any such accident or incident could involve costs related to the repair or replacement of a damaged aircraft and its consequent temporary or permanent loss from service. In addition, an accident or incident could result in significant legal claims against the Company from injured passengers and others who experienced injury or property damage as a result of the accident or incident, including ground victims. Ryanair maintains aviation third-party liability insurance, passenger liability insurance, employer liability insurance, directors and officers liability insurance, aircraft insurance for aircraft loss or damage, and other business insurance in amounts per occurrence consistent with industry standards. Ryanair believes its insurance coverage is adequate, although not comprehensive. There can be no assurance that the amount of such coverage will not need to be increased, that insurance premiums will not increase significantly or that Ryanair will not be forced to bear substantial losses from accidents. Ryanairs insurance does not cover claims for losses incurred when, due to unforeseen events, airspace is closed and aircraft are grounded, such as the airspace closures described in Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Airline IndustryVolcanic Ash Emissions Could Affect the Company and Have a Material Adverse Impact on the Companys Results of Operation, which resulted from volcanic ash in the northern European airspace during April and May 2010.
The cost of insurance coverage for certain third-party liabilities arising from acts of war or terrorism increased dramatically as a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. In the immediate aftermath, aircraft liability war indemnities for amounts above $50 million were, in the absence of any alternative coverage, provided by the Irish Government at pre-September 11, 2001 levels of coverage on the basis of a per-passenger surcharge. In March 2002, once such coverage was again commercially available, Ryanair arranged coverage to replace that provided by the government indemnity. The replacement insurance coverage operated on the basis of a per-passenger surcharge with an additional surcharge based on hull values. Ryanairs insurers have indicated that the scope of the Companys current war-related insurance coverage may exclude certain types of catastrophic incidents, which may result in the Company seeking alternative coverage. Ryanair to date has passed increased insurance costs on to passengers by means of a special insurance levy incorporated in each ticket.
35
During the 2006 fiscal year, Ryanair established Aviation Insurance (IOM) Limited (AIL), a wholly owned insurance company subsidiary, to provide the Company with self-insurance as part of its ongoing risk-management strategy. AIL underwrites a portion of the Companys aviation insurance program, which covers not only the Companys aircraft but also its liability to passengers and to third parties. AIL reinsures virtually all of the aviation insurance risk it underwrites with recognized third parties in the aviation reinsurance market, with the amount of AILs maximum aggregate exposure not currently subject to such reinsurance agreements being equal to approximately $16.5 million. In addition to aviation insurance, AIL has underwritten most of the single trip travel insurance policies sold on Ryanair.com since February 1, 2011.
Council Regulation (EC) No. 2027/97, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No. 889/2002, governs air carrier liability. This legislation provides for unlimited liability of an air carrier in the event of death or bodily injuries suffered by passengers, implementing the Warsaw Convention of 1929 for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to Transportation by Air, as amended by the Montreal Convention of 1999. Ryanair has extended its liability insurance to meet the appropriate requirements of the legislation. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the Airline IndustryThe Company Faces the Risk of Loss and Liability for information on the Companys risks of loss and liability.
36
The following are the principal properties owned or leased by the Company:
Location |
Site Area (Sq. Meters) |
Floor Space (Sq. Meters) |
Tenure | Activity | ||||||||
Dublin Airport |
1,370 | 1,649 | Leasehold | Administration Offices and crew rooms | ||||||||
Concourse Building, Airside Business Park, Swords, Dublin |
12,141 | 9,298 | Freehold | New Corporate Headquarters | ||||||||
Dublin Airport (Hangar No. 1) |
1,620 | 1,620 | Leasehold | Aircraft Maintenance | ||||||||
Dublin Airport (Hangar No. 2) |
5,200 | 5,000 | Leasehold | Aircraft Maintenance | ||||||||
Dublin Airport Business Park |
955 | 749 | Leasehold | Administration Offices (Leasehold terminated on 22 June 2014) | ||||||||
Phoenix House, Conyngham Road, Dublin |
2,566 | 3,899 | Freehold | Rental Property | ||||||||
Satellite 3, Stansted Airport |
605 | 605 | Leasehold | Operations Center and Administrative Offices | ||||||||
Stansted Airport (Hangar) |
12,161 | 10,301 | Leasehold | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar and Simulator Training Center | ||||||||
Stansted Airport |
375 | 375 | Leasehold | Training Centre | ||||||||
Stansted Storage Facilities |
378 | 531 | Leasehold | Aircraft Maintenance | ||||||||
East Midlands Airport |
3,890 | 2,801 | Freehold | Simulator and Training Center | ||||||||
East Midlands Airport |
2,045 | 634 | Leasehold | Training Center | ||||||||
Bremen Airport |
5,952 | 5,874 | Leasehold | Terminal and Aircraft Maintenance Hangar | ||||||||
Skavsta Airport (Hangar) |
1,936 | 1,936 | Leasehold | Aircraft Maintenance | ||||||||
Prestwick Airport (Hangar) |
10,052 | 10,052 | Leasehold | Aircraft Maintenance | ||||||||
Frankfurt (Hahn) Airport (Hangar) |
5,064 | 5,064 | Leasehold | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar and Simulator Training Center | ||||||||
Kaunas Airport (Hangar) |
1,700 | 1,700 | Leasehold | Aircraft Maintenance | ||||||||
Rygge Airport (Hangar) |
1,700 | 1,700 | Leasehold | Aircraft Maintenance | ||||||||
Billund Airport (Hangar) |
2,800 | 2,800 | Leasehold | Aircraft Maintenance |
Ryanair has agreements with the DAA, the Irish government authority charged with operating Dublin Airport, to lease bag-drop counters and other space at the passenger and cargo terminal facilities at Dublin Airport. The airport office facilities used by Ryanair at London (Stansted) are leased from the airport authority; similar facilities at each of the other airports Ryanair serves are provided by Servisair plc or other service providers.
37
Ryanairs logo and the slogans Ryanair.com The Low Fares Website and Ryanair The Low Fares Airline have been registered as Community Trade Marks (CTMs). Ryanair has also registered the CTM for the word Ryanairhotels.com. A CTM allows a trademark owner to obtain a single registration of its trademark, which registration affords uniform protection for that trademark in all EU member states. The registration gives Ryanair an exclusive monopoly over the use of its trade name with regard to similar services and the right to sue for trademark infringement should another party use an identical or confusingly similar trademark in relation to identical, or similar services.
Ryanair has not registered either its name or its logo as a trademark in Ireland, as CTM-registration provides all of the protection available from an Irish registration, and management believes there are therefore no advantages in making a separate Irish application.
Ryanairs trademarks include:
| Community (Word) Trade Mark registration number 004168721 comprised of the word Ryanair in classes 16, 28, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and 42 (Nice Classification); |
| Community (Figurative) Trade Mark registration number 001493329 comprising the following graphic representation: |
in classes 16, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and 42 (Nice Classification) and class 27.5.1 (Vienna classification);
| Community (Figurative) Trade Mark registration number 00446559 comprising the following graphic representation: |
in classes 16, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and 42 (Nice Classification) and class 22.1.16 (Vienna classification);
| Community (Figurative) Trade Mark registration number 000338301 |
comprising the following graphic representation:
in classes 16, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and 42 (Nice Classification) and class 22.1.16 (Vienna classification)
38
Liberalization of the EU Air Transportation Market
Ryanair began its flight operations in 1985, during a decade in which the governments of Ireland and the U.K. liberalized the bilateral arrangements for the operation of air services between the two countries. In 1992, the Council of Ministers of the EU adopted a package of measures intended to liberalize the internal market for air transportation in the EU. The liberalization included measures that allow EU air carriers substantial freedom to set air fares, provided EU air carriers greatly enhanced access to routes within the EU, and also introduced a licensing procedure for EU air carriers. Beginning in April 1997, EU air carriers have generally been able to provide passenger services on domestic routes within any EU member state outside their home country of operations without restriction.
Regulatory Authorities
Ryanair is subject to Irish and EU regulation, which is implemented primarily by the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport (DTTAS), the Irish Aviation Authority (IAA), the European Commission, and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). Management believes that the present regulatory environment in Ireland and the EU is characterized by high sensitivity to safety and security issues, which is demonstrated by intensive reviews of safety-related procedures, training, and equipment by the national and EU regulatory authorities.
Commission for Aviation Regulation CAR. The CAR is currently primarily responsible for deciding maximum airport charges only at Dublin Airport. See Airport OperationsAirport Charges above.
The CAR also has responsibility for licensing Irish airlines, subject to the requirements of EU law. It issues operating licenses under the provisions of EU Regulation 1008/2008 (formerly 2407/92). An operating license is an authorization permitting the holder to transport passengers, mail and/or cargo by air. The criteria for granting an operating license include, inter alia, an air carriers financial fitness, the adequacy of its insurance, and the fitness of the persons who will manage the air carrier. In addition, in order to obtain and maintain an operating license, Irish and EU regulations require that (i) the air carrier must be owned and continue to be owned directly or through majority ownership by EU member states and/or nationals of EU member states and (ii) the air carrier must at all times be effectively controlled by such EU member states or EU nationals. The CAR has broad authority to revoke an operating license. See Item 10. Additional InformationLimitations on Share Ownership by Non-EU Nationals. See also Item 3. Risk FactorsRisks Related to Ownership of the Companys Ordinary Shares or ADRsEU Rules Impose Restrictions on the Ownership of Ryanair Holdings Ordinary Shares by Non-EU nationals and the Company has Instituted a Ban on the Purchase of Ordinary Shares by Non-EU Nationals above.
Ryanairs current operating license became effective on December 1, 1993, and is subject to periodic review. The Flight Operations Department is also subject to ongoing review by the IAA, which reviews the departments audits, including flight audits, training audits, document audits, and quality audits. Ryanairs current Air Operator Certificate No IE 7/94 was issued on January 28, 2014.
Irish Aviation Authority. The IAA is primarily responsible for the operational and regulatory function and services relating to the safety, security and technical aspects of aviation in Ireland. To operate in Ireland and the EU, an Irish air carrier is required to hold an air operators certificate granted by the IAA attesting to the air carriers operational and technical competence to conduct airline services with specified types of aircraft. The IAA has broad authority to amend or revoke an air operators certificate, with Ryanairs ability to continue to hold its air operators certificate being subject to ongoing compliance with applicable statutes, rules and regulations pertaining to the airline industry, including any new rules and regulations that may be adopted in the future.
The IAA is also responsible for overseeing and regulating the operations of Irish air carriers. Matters within the scope of the IAAs regulatory authority include: air safety; aircraft certification; personnel licensing and training; maintenance, manufacture, repair, airworthiness, and operation of aircraft; implementation of EU legislation; aircraft noise; aviation security and ground services. Each of the Companys aircraft is required to have a Certificate of
39
Airworthiness, which is issued by the IAA. The validity of Certificates of Airworthiness is subject to the review by the IAA. Each certificate is generally valid for a 12-month period. In March 2009, Ryanair received Sub-Part (I) approval from the IAA, which gives Ryanair the authority to extend the validity of its certificates, subject to certain record checks and physical aircraft inspections being performed by Ryanairs quality department. The Companys flight personnel, flight and emergency procedures, aircraft, and maintenance facilities are subject to periodic inspections by the IAA. The IAA has broad regulatory and enforcement powers, including the authority to require reports; inspect the books, records, premises, and aircraft of a carrier; and investigate and institute enforcement proceedings. Failure to comply with IAA regulations can result in revocation of operating certification.
In July 1999, the IAA awarded Ryanair an air operators certificate, which is subject to routine audit and review, in recognition of Ryanairs satisfaction of the relevant EU requirements for the operation of commercial air transport (EU OPS 1). The requirements of EU OPS 1 have been incorporated into European law as prescribed in Regulation (EEC) 3922/91 and were applied in full on July 16, 2008. All current regulatory requirements are addressed in the Ryanair Operations Manual Part A (as amended). The current Manual, Issue 3 Revision 9, was approved by the IAA on October 31, 2013.
Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport. The Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport (DTTAS) is responsible for implementation of certain EU and Irish legislation and international standards relating to air transport.
In June 2005, the Irish Minister for Transport enacted legislation strengthening rights for air passengers following the enactment of EU legislation requiring compensation of airline passengers who have been denied boarding on a flight for which they hold a valid ticket (Regulation (EC) No. 261/2004), which came into force on February 17, 2005. See Item 3. Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Airline IndustryEU Regulation on Passenger Compensation Could Significantly Increase Related Costs.
The European Aviation Safety Agency. EASA is an agency of the EU that has been given specific regulatory and executive tasks in the field of aviation safety. EASA was established through Regulation (EC) No. 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and the Council of July 15, 2002, repealed by Basic Regulation (EC) 216-2008. The purpose of EASA is to draw-up common standards to ensure the highest levels of safety, oversee their uniform application across Europe and promote them at the global level. The EASA formally started its work on September 28, 2003, taking over the responsibility for regulating airworthiness, maintenance and air crew issues within the EU member states.
Eurocontrol. The European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol) is an autonomous European organization established under the Eurocontrol Convention of December 13, 1960. Eurocontrol is responsible for, inter alia, the safety of air navigation and the collection of route charges for en route air navigation facilities and services throughout Europe. Ireland is a party to several international agreements concerning Eurocontrol. These agreements have been implemented in Irish law, which provides for the payment of charges to Eurocontrol in respect of air navigation services for aircraft in airspace under the control of Eurocontrol. The relevant legislation imposes liability for the payment of any charges upon the operators of the aircraft in respect of which services are provided and upon the owners of such aircraft or the managers of airports used by such aircraft. Ryanair, as an aircraft operator, is primarily responsible for the payment to Eurocontrol of charges incurred in relation to its aircraft.
The legislation authorizes the detention of aircraft in the case of default in the payment of any charge for air navigation services by the aircraft operator or the aircraft owner, as the case may be. This power of detention extends to any equipment, stores or documents, which may be onboard the aircraft when it is detained, and may result in the possible sale of the aircraft.
European Commission. The European Commission is in the process of introducing an updated legislative package to its single European sky policy, called SES2+, which would lead to changes to air traffic management and control within the EU. The single European sky policy currently consists of the Framework Regulation (Reg. (EC) No. 549/2004) plus three technical regulations on the provision of air navigation services, organization and use of the airspace and the inter-operability of the European air traffic management network. These regulations have recently been amended by the so-called Single European Sky II regulation (EU Regulation 1070/09), which
40
focused on air traffic control (ATC) performance and extended the authority of EASA to include Airports and Air Traffic Management. The objective of the policy is to enhance safety standards and the overall efficiency of air traffic in Europe, as well as to reduce the cost of air traffic control services.
On September 6, 2005, the European Commission announced new guidelines on the financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines by regional airports based on its February 2004 finding in the Charleroi case, a decision that the EU Court of First Instance (CFI) has since annulled in December 2008. The guidelines only apply to publicly owned regional airports, and place restrictions on the incentives that these airports can offer airlines to deliver traffic. Ryanair believes that the CFIs annulment of the Charleroi decision severely undermines these guidelines. In April 2014, the European Commission published final revised guidelines that better reflect the commercial reality of the liberalized air transport market, but still place restrictions on the incentives public airports can offer to airlines delivering traffic, when compared with the commercial freedom available to private airports.
The European Union also adopted legislation on airport charges (EU Directive 2009/12), which was originally intended to address abusive pricing at monopoly airports. However, the legislation includes all European airports with over five million passengers per year. Management believes that this will likely increase the administrative burdens on smaller airports and may lead to higher airport charges, while the scope that exists within this Directive to address abuses of their dominant positions by Europes larger airports is very limited. See Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related-Party TransactionsOther Financial InformationLegal ProceedingsEU State Aid-Related Proceedings.
The European Union also passed legislation calling for increased transparency in airline fares, which requires the inclusion of all mandatory taxes, fees, and charges in advertised prices. Ryanair currently includes this information in its advertised fares in all markets where it operates. However, certain regulatory authorities have alleged that some fees applied by airlines, including Ryanair, on an avoidable basis are in fact mandatory. Ryanair amended its website to include information on fees in June 2012 and incorporated further changes to meet these requirements on its website in August 2012 and December 2012.
Registration of Aircraft
Pursuant to the Irish Aviation Authority (Nationality and Registration of Aircraft) Order 2002 (the Order), the IAA regulates the registration of aircraft in Ireland. In order to be registered or continue to be registered in Ireland, an aircraft must be wholly owned by either (i) a citizen of Ireland or a citizen of another member state of the EU having a place of residence or business in Ireland or (ii) a company registered in and having a place of business in Ireland and having its principal place of business in Ireland or another member state of the EU and not less than two-thirds of the directors of which are citizens of Ireland or of another member state of the EU. As of the date of this report, nine of the ten directors of Ryanair Holdings are citizens of Ireland or of another member state of the EU. An aircraft will also fulfill these conditions if it is wholly owned by such citizens or companies in combination. Notwithstanding the fact that these particular conditions may not be met, the IAA retains discretion to register an aircraft in Ireland so long as it is in compliance with the other conditions for registration under the Order. Any such registration may, however, be made subject to certain conditions. In order to be registered, an aircraft must also continue to comply with any applicable provisions of Irish law. The registration of any aircraft can be cancelled if it is found that it is not in compliance with the requirements for registration under the Order and, in particular: (i) if the ownership requirements are not met; (ii) if the aircraft has failed to comply with any applicable safety requirements specified by the IAA in relation to the aircraft or aircraft of a similar type; or (iii) if the IAA decides in any case that it is not in the public interest for the aircraft to remain registered in Ireland.
Regulation of Competition
Competition/Antitrust Law. It is a general principle of EU competition law that no agreement may be concluded between two or more separate economic undertakings that prevents, restricts or distorts competition in the common market or any part of the common market. Such an arrangement may nevertheless be exempted by the European Commission, on either an individual or category basis. The second general principle of EU competition law is that any business or businesses having a dominant position in the EU common market or any substantial part of the common market may not abuse such dominant position. Similar competition laws apply at national level in EU member states. Ryanair is subject to the application of the general rules of EU competition law as well as specific rules on competition in the airline sector.
41
An aggrieved person may sue for breach of EU competition law in the courts of a member state and/or petition the European Commission for an order to put an end to the breach of competition law. The European Commission also may impose fines and daily penalties on businesses and the courts of the member states may award damages and other remedies (such as injunctions) in appropriate circumstances.
Competition law in Ireland is primarily embodied in the Competition Act 2002. This Act is modeled on the EU competition law system. The Irish rules generally prohibit anti-competitive arrangements among businesses and prohibit the abuse of a dominant position. These rules are enforced either by public enforcement (primarily by the Competition Authority) through both criminal and civil sanctions or by private action in the courts. These rules apply to the airline sector, but are subject to EU rules that override any contrary provisions of Irish competition law. Ryanair has been subject to an abuse-of-dominance investigation by the Irish Competition Authority in relation to service between Dublin and Cork. The Competition Authority closed its investigation in July 2009 with a finding in favor of Ryanair.
State Aid. The EU rules control aid granted by member states to businesses on a selective or discriminatory basis. The EU Treaty prevents member states from granting such aid unless approved in advance by the EU. Any such grant of state aid to an airline is subject to challenge before the EU or, in certain circumstances, national courts. If aid is held to have been unlawfully granted it may have to be repaid by the airline to the granting member state, together with interest thereon. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyThe Company Is Subject to Legal Proceedings Alleging State Aid at Certain Airports and Item 8. Financial InformationOther Financial InformationLegal Proceedings.
Environmental Regulation
Aircraft Noise Regulations. Ryanair is subject to international, national and, in some cases, local noise regulation standards. EU and Irish regulations have required that all aircraft operated by Ryanair comply with Stage 3 noise requirements since April 1, 2002. All of Ryanairs aircraft currently comply with these regulations. Certain airports in the U.K. (including London Stansted and London Gatwick) and continental Europe have established local noise restrictions, including limits on the number of hourly or daily operations or the time of such operations.
Company Facilities. Environmental controls are generally imposed under Irish law through property planning legislation, specifically the Local Government (Planning and Development) Acts of 1963 to 1999, the Planning and Development Act 2000 and regulations made there under. At Dublin Airport, Ryanair operates on land controlled by the DAA. Planning permission for its facilities has been granted in accordance with both the zoning and planning requirements of Dublin Airport. There is also specific Irish environmental legislation implementing applicable EU directives and regulations, to which Ryanair adheres. From time to time, noxious or potentially toxic substances are held on a temporary basis within Ryanairs engineering facilities at Dublin Airport, Glasgow (Prestwick), London (Stansted), Frankfurt (Hahn), Stockholm (Skavsta), Oslo (Rygge) and Kaunas. However, at all times Ryanairs storage and handling of these substances complies with the relevant regulatory requirements. At Ryanairs Glasgow (Prestwick) and London (Stansted) maintenance facilities, all normal waste is removed in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act of 1996 and Duty of Care Waste Regulations. For special waste removal, Ryanair operates under the Special Waste Regulations 1998. At all other facilities Ryanair adheres to all local and EU regulations.
Ryanairs Policy on Noise and Emissions. Ryanair is committed to reducing emissions and noise through investments in next generation aircraft and engine technologies and the implementation of certain operational and commercial decisions to minimize the environmental impact of its operations. According to the Air Travel Carbon and Energy Efficiency Report published by Brighter Planet, Ryanair is the industry leader in terms of environmental efficiency, and the Company is constantly working towards improving its performance.
In December 2005, Ryanair completed the fleet replacement program it commenced in 1999. All of Ryanairs older Boeing 737-200A aircraft were replaced with Boeing 737-800 next generation aircraft, and
42
Ryanair now operates a single-aircraft-type fleet of Boeing 737-800 next generation aircraft with an average age of just over 5.5 years. The design of the new aircraft is aimed at minimizing drag, thereby reducing the rate of fuel burn and noise levels. The engines are also quieter and more fuel-efficient. Furthermore, by moving to an all Boeing 737-800 next generation fleet, Ryanair reduced the unit emissions per passenger due to the inherent capacity increase in the Boeing 737-800 aircraft. The Boeing 737-800 next generation aircraft have a significantly superior fuel-burn to passenger-kilometer ratio than Ryanairs former fleet of Boeing 737-200A aircraft. See Aircraft above for details on Ryanairs fleet plan.
Ryanair has also installed winglets on all of its existing aircraft and all future aircraft will also be fitted with winglets. Winglets reduce both the rate of fuel burn and carbon dioxide emissions by approximately 4% and also reduce noise emissions.
In addition, Ryanair has distinctive operational characteristics that management believes are helpful to the general environment. In particular, Ryanair:
| operates with a high-seat density of 189 seats and an all-economy configuration, as opposed to the 162 seats and two-class configuration of the Boeing 737-800 aircraft used by traditional network airlines, reducing fuel burn and emissions per seat-kilometer flown; |
| has reduced per-passenger emissions through higher load factors; |
| better utilizes existing infrastructure by operating out of underutilized secondary and regional airports throughout Europe, which limits the use of holding patterns and taxiing times, thus reducing fuel burn and emissions and reducing the need for new airport infrastructure; |
| provides direct services as opposed to connecting flights, in order to limit the need for passengers to transfer at main hubs and thus reduces the number of take-offs and landings per journey from four to two, reducing fuel burn and emissions per journey; |
| has no late-night departures of aircraft, reducing the impact of noise emissions; and |
| is currently evaluating the benefits of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, a variant of the 737, with new more fuel-efficient engines. |
Emissions Trading. On November 19, 2008, the European Council of Ministers adopted legislation to add aviation to the EU Emissions Trading Scheme as of 2012. This scheme, which has thus far applied mainly to energy producers, is a cap-and-trade system for CO2 emissions to encourage industries to improve their CO2 efficiency. Under the legislation, airlines were granted initial CO2 allowances based on historical revenue ton kilometers and a CO2 efficiency benchmark. Any shortage of allowances has to be purchased in the open market and/or at government auctions. Management believes that this legislation is likely to have a negative impact on the European airline industry. Ryanair takes its environmental responsibilities seriously and intends to continue to improve its environmental efficiency and to minimize emissions. Under Regulation 7 of The UK Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors Report) Regulations 2013, Ryanair is obliged to state its annual quantity of emissions in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. Ryanairs EU Emissions Trading Scheme monitoring, reporting and allowance surrender obligations are mandated on a calendar year basis. For calendar year 2013, Ryanair emitted 7,649,120 tCO2, which equates to 0.094 tCO2 per passenger.
Aviation Taxes. Ryanair is fundamentally opposed to the introduction of any aviation taxes, including any environmental taxes, fuel taxes or emissions levies. Ryanair has and continues to offer the lowest fares in Europe, to make passenger air travel affordable and accessible to European consumers. Ryanair believes that the imposition of additional taxes on airlines will not only increase airfares, but will discourage new entrants into the market, resulting in less choice for consumers. Ryanair believes this would ultimately have adverse effects on the European economy in general. There is in particular no justification for any environmental taxes on aviation following the introduction of the Emissions Trading Scheme for airlines.
43
As a company, Ryanair believes in free market competition and that the imposition of aviation taxation would favor the less efficient flag carrierswhich generally have smaller and older aircraft, lower load factors, and a much higher fuel burn per passenger, and which operate primarily into congested airportsand reduce competition. Furthermore, the introduction of a tax at a European level only would distort competition between airlines operating solely within Europe and those operating also outside of Europe. We believe that the introduction of such a tax would also be incompatible with international law.
Airport charges
The EU Airport Charges Directive of March 2009 sets forth general principles that are to be followed by airports with more than five million passenger per annum, and all capital city airports irrespective of their passenger throughput, when setting airport charges, and provides for an appeals procedure for airlines in the event they are not satisfied with the level of charges. However, Ryanair does not believe that this procedure will be effective or that it will constrain those airports that are currently abusing their dominant position, in part because the legislation was mis-transposed in certain countries, such as Ireland and Spain, so as to deprive airlines of even the basic safeguards provided for in the Directive. This legislation may in fact lead to higher airport charges, depending on how its provisions are applied by EU member states and subsequently by the courts.
Slots
Currently, the majority of Ryanairs bases of operations have no slot allocation restrictions; however, traffic at a substantial number of the airports Ryanair serves, including its primary bases are regulated by means of slot allocations, which represent authorizations to take off or land at a particular airport within a specified time period. In addition, EU law currently regulates the acquisition, transfer, and loss of slots. Applicable EU regulations currently prohibit the buying or selling of slots for cash. The European Commission adopted a regulation in April 2004 (Regulation (EC) No. 793/2004) that made some minor amendments to the current allocation system, allowing for limited transfers of, but not trading in, slots. Slots may be transferred from one route to another by the same carrier, transferred within a group or as part of a change of control of a carrier, or swapped between carriers. In April 2008, the European Commission issued a communication on the application of the slot allocation regulation, signaling the acceptance of secondary trading of airport slots between airlines. This is expected to allow more flexibility and mobility in the use of slots and will further enhance possibilities for market entry at slot constrained airports. Any future legislation that might create an official secondary market for slots could create a potential source of revenue for certain of Ryanairs current and potential competitors, many of which have many more slots allocated at primary airports at present than Ryanair. The European Commission proposed a revision to the slots legislation reflecting the principle of secondary trading, which is currently being negotiated by the EU institutions, and will not be finalized before the middle of 2014. Slot values depend on several factors, including the airport, time of day covered, the availability of slots and the class of aircraft. Ryanairs ability to gain access to and develop its operations at slot-controlled airports will be affected by the availability of slots for takeoffs and landings at these specific airports. New entrants to an airport are currently given certain privileges in terms of obtaining slots, but such privileges are subject to the grandfathered rights of existing operators that are utilizing their slots. There is no assurance that Ryanair will be able to obtain a sufficient number of slots at the slot-controlled airports that it desires to serve in the future at the time it needs them or on acceptable terms.
Other
Health and occupational safety issues relating to the Company are largely addressed in Ireland by the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act, 2005 and other regulations under that act. Although licenses or permits are not issued under such legislation, compliance is monitored by the Health and Safety Authority (the Authority), which is the regulating body in this area. The Authority periodically reviews Ryanairs health and safety record and when appropriate, issues improvement notices or prohibition notices. Ryanair has responded to all such notices to the satisfaction of the Authority. Other safety issues are covered by the Irish Aviation Orders, which may vary from time to time.
The Companys operations are subject to the general laws of Ireland and, insofar as they are applicable in Ireland, the laws of the EU. The Company may also become subject to additional regulatory requirements in the future. The Company is also subject to local laws and regulations at locations where it operates and the regulations of various local authorities that operate the airports it serves.
44
For certain information about each of the Companys key facilities, see Facilities above. Management believes that the Companys facilities are suitable for its needs and are well maintained.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
There are no unresolved staff comments.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto included in Item 18. Those consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Ryanairs current business strategy dates to the early 1990s, when a new management team, including the current chief executive, commenced the restructuring of Ryanairs operations to become a low-fares airline based on the low-cost operating model pioneered by Southwest Airlines Co. in the United States. During the period between 1992 and 1994, Ryanair expanded its route network to include scheduled passenger services between Dublin and Birmingham, Manchester and Glasgow (Prestwick). In 1994, Ryanair began standardizing its fleet by purchasing used Boeing 737-200A aircraft to replace substantially all of its leased aircraft. Beginning in 1996, Ryanair continued to expand its service from Dublin to new provincial destinations in the U.K. In August 1996, Irish Air, L.P., an investment vehicle led by David Bonderman and certain of his associates at the Texas Pacific Group, acquired a minority interest in the Company. Ryanair Holdings completed its initial public offering in June 1997.
From 1997 through June 30, 2014, Ryanair launched service on more than 1,600 routes throughout Europe and also increased the frequency of service on a number of its principal routes. During that period, in addition to Dublin, Ryanair established 69 airports as bases of operations. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyRoute System, Scheduling and Fares for a list of these bases. Ryanair has increased the number of booked passengers from approximately 4.9 million in the 1999 fiscal year to approximately 81.7 million in the 2014 fiscal year. Ryanair had a principal fleet of 297 Boeing 737-800 aircraft and 5 additional leased aircraft acquired on short term leases for the summer of 2014 to provide extra capacity, and now serves approximately 186 airports.
Ryanair expects to have approximately 426 aircraft in its operating fleet by March 31, 2019. This is subject to lease handbacks and disposals over the period to March 31, 2019 meeting current expectations. See Liquidity and Capital Resources and Item 4. Information on the CompanyAircraft for additional details.
Since Ryanair pioneered its low cost operating model in Europe in the early 1990s, its passenger volumes and scheduled passenger revenues have increased significantly because it has substantially increased capacity and demand has been sufficient to match the increased capacity. Ryanairs annual booked passenger volume has grown from approximately 945,000 passengers in the calendar year 1992 to approximately 81.7 million passengers in the 2014 fiscal year.
Ryanairs revenue passenger miles (RPMs) increased approximately 8% from 59,865.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 64,470.4 million in the 2014 fiscal year due primarily to an increase of approximately 7% in scheduled available seat miles (ASMs) from 72,829.9 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 77,916.5 million in the 2014 fiscal year. Scheduled passenger revenues decreased approximately 1% from 3,819.8 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 3,789.5 million in the 2014 fiscal year. Average booked passenger fare decreased from 48.20 in the 2013 fiscal year to 46.40 in the 2014 fiscal year.
45
Expanding passenger volumes and capacity, high load factors and aggressive cost containment have enabled Ryanair to continue to generate operating profits despite increasing price competition and increases in certain costs. Ryanairs total break-even load factor was 70% in the 2013 fiscal year and 72% in the 2014 fiscal year. Cost per passenger was 52.56 in the 2013 fiscal year and 53.61 in the 2014 fiscal year, with the increase primarily reflecting the higher fuel cost per passenger of 24.65 in the 2014 fiscal year, as compared to 23.79 in the 2013 fiscal year. Ryanair recorded operating profits of 718.2 million in the 2013 fiscal year and 658.6 million in the 2014 fiscal year. The Company recorded a profit after taxation of 569.3 million in the 2013 fiscal year and profit after taxation of 522.8 million in the 2014 fiscal year. Ryanair will take delivery of 11 Boeing 737-800 aircraft in 2015 fiscal year and expects that these deliveries, along with its plan to ground fewer aircraft in the winter of 2015 fiscal year and increased load factors will allow for an approximately 4% increase in fiscal 2015 traffic See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the Company Ryanair Has Decided to Seasonally Ground Aircraft.
Investment in Aer Lingus
The Company owns 29.8% of Aer Lingus, which it acquired in fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 at a total cost of 407.2 million. Following the approval of its shareholders, management proposed in the 2007 fiscal year to effect a tender offer to acquire the entire share capital of Aer Lingus. This 2006 offer was, however, prohibited by the European Commission on competition grounds in June 2007. Ryanairs management viewed the acquisition of Aer Lingus in the context of the overall trend of consolidation among airlines in Europe and believed that the acquisition would lead to the formation of one strong Irish airline group able to compete with large carriers such as Lufthansa, Air France/KLM and British Airways/Iberia (now International Airlines Group). During the EU competition review, the Company made a commitment that if the acquisition was approved, Ryanair would eliminate Aer Lingus fuel surcharges and reduce its fares, which would have resulted in Aer Lingus passengers saving approximately 100 million per year. The Company was therefore disappointed by the European Commissions decision to prohibit this offer. This decision was the first adverse decision taken in respect of any EU airline merger and the first-ever adverse decision in respect of a proposed merger of two companies with less than 5% of the EU market for their services. Ryanair filed an appeal with the CFI, which was heard in July 2009. On July 6, 2010, the CFI upheld the Commissions decision.
In October 2007, the European Commission also reached a formal decision that it would not force Ryanair to sell its shares in Aer Lingus. Aer Lingus appealed this decision before the CFI. This case was heard in July 2009 and on July 6, 2010 the court rejected Aer Lingus appeal and confirmed that Ryanair cannot be forced to dispose of its 29.8% stake in Aer Lingus under the European Merger Regulation. However, EU legislation may change in the future to require such a forced disposition. If eventually forced to dispose of its stake in Aer Lingus, Ryanair could suffer significant losses due to the negative impact on market prices of the forced sale of such a significant portion of Aer Lingus shares.
On December 1, 2008, Ryanair made a new offer to acquire all of the ordinary shares of Aer Lingus it did not own at a price of 1.40 per ordinary share. Ryanair offered to keep Aer Lingus as a separate company, maintain the Aer Lingus brand, and retain its Heathrow slots and connectivity. Ryanair also proposed to double Aer Lingus short-haul fleet from 33 to 66 aircraft and to create 1,000 associated new jobs over a five-year period. If the offer had been accepted, the Irish government would have received over 180 million in cash. The employee share ownership trust and employees, who owned 18% of Aer Lingus, would have received over 137 million in cash. The Company met Aer Lingus management, representatives of the employee share ownership trust and other parties, including members of the Irish Government. The offer of 1.40 per share represented a premium of approximately 25% over the closing price of 1.12 for Aer Lingus shares on November 28, 2008. As the Company was unable to secure the shareholders support, it decided on January 28, 2009 to withdraw its offer for Aer Lingus.
The United Kingdoms Office of Fair Trading (OFT) wrote to Ryanair in September 2010, advising that it intended to investigate Ryanairs minority stake in Aer Lingus. Ryanair objected on the basis that the OFTs investigation was time-barred. Ryanair contended that the OFT had the opportunity, which it missed, to investigate Ryanairs minority stake within four months from the European Commissions June 2007 decision to prohibit
46
Ryanairs takeover of Aer Lingus. The OFT agreed in October 2010 to suspend its investigation pending the outcome of Ryanairs appeal against the OFTs decision that its investigation is within time. On July 28, 2011, the Competition Appeal Tribunal ruled that the OFT was not time barred when it attempted in September 2010 to open an investigation into Ryanairs 2006 acquisition of a minority non-controlling stake in Aer Lingus. Ryanair subsequently appealed the Competition Appeal Tribunals decision. On November 24, 2011, the UK Court of Appeal ordered a stay of the OFTs investigation pending the Courts review of whether the OFTs investigation was time barred. On May 22, 2012, the UK Court of Appeal found that the OFT was not time barred to investigate Ryanairs minority stake in Aer Lingus in September 2010. Ryanair subsequently sought permission to appeal that ruling to the UK Supreme Court, but permission was refused. On June 15, 2012, the OFT referred the investigation of Ryanairs minority stake in Aer Lingus to the UK Competition Commission. On August 28, 2013, the UKCC issued its final decision in which it stated that Ryanairs shareholding gave it the ability to exercise material influence over Aer Lingus and had led or may be expected to lead to a substantial lessening of competition in the markets for air passenger services between Great Britain and Ireland. As a result of its findings, the UKCC ordered Ryanair to reduce its shareholding in Aer Lingus to below 5 percent of Aer Lingus issued ordinary shares. Ryanair appealed the UKCCs final decision to the CAT on September 23, 2013. The CAT rejected Ryanairs appeal on March 7, 2014. On April 23, 2014, the CAT granted Ryanair permission to appeal the CATs judgment to the UK Court of Appeal. Should this appeal, or any subsequent appeal to the UK Supreme Court be unsuccessful, Ryanair could suffer losses due to the negative impact on market prices of the forced sale of such a significant portion of Aer Lingus shares. Ryanair believes that the enforcement of any such decision should be delayed until the outcome of Ryanairs appeal against the European Commissions February 2013 prohibition decision of Ryanairs 2012 offer for Aer Lingus, as described below, and the conclusion of any appeals against the UKCCs decision in the UK courts. However, it is possible that the UKCC will seek to enforce any such sell-down remedy at an earlier date.
On June 19, 2012, Ryanair made a third offer to acquire all of the ordinary shares of Aer Lingus it did not own at a price of 1.30 per ordinary share. The timing of the offer was influenced by: (i) the continued consolidation of European airlines, and more recently the International Airlines Group (the parent company of British Airways) takeover of British Midland International, where the No. 1 airline at Heathrow was allowed to acquire the No. 2; (ii) the additional capacity available at Dublin airport following the opening of Terminal 2 and the decline in traffic from 23.3 million passengers per annum in 2007 to 18.7 million in 2011, has resulted in Dublin airport operating at approximately 50% capacity; (iii) the change in the Irish government policy since 2006 in that the Irish government indicated that it had decided to sell its stake in Aer Lingus; (iv) the fact that under the terms of the bailout agreement provided by the European Commission, European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund to Ireland, the Irish government committed to sell its stake in Aer Lingus; (v) the fact that the ESOT (Employee Share Ownership Trust), which at the time of the unsuccessful 2006 offer controlled 15% of Aer Lingus, had been disbanded since December 2010 and the shares distributed to the individual members, with the result that Ryanairs new offer was, in Ryanairs view, capable of reaching over 50% acceptance either with or without government acceptance; and (vi) the fact that Etihad, an Abu Dhabi based airline, had recently acquired a 3% stake in Aer Lingus and had expressed an interest in buying the governments 25% stake in Aer Lingus (the offer therefore provided Etihad or any other potential bidder the opportunity to purchase the governments stake).
Ryanair offered to keep Aer Lingus as a separate company, maintain the Aer Lingus brand, and to grow its traffic from 9.5 million to over 14.5 million passengers over a five year period post acquisition, by growing Aer Lingus short haul traffic at some of Europes major airports where Aer Lingus currently operates and Ryanair does not. Ryanair also intended to increase Aer Lingus transatlantic traffic from Ireland, which has fallen in recent years, by investing in operations. If the offer was accepted, the Irish government would have received 173 million in cash. The offer of 1.30 per share represented a premium of approximately 38% over the closing price of 0.94 for Aer Lingus shares as of June 19, 2012. The offer was conditional on competition approval by the European Commission. However, on February 27, 2013, the European Commission prohibited the acquisition by Ryanair of the remaining share capital of Aer Lingus. Ryanair appealed this prohibition to the EU General Court on May 8, 2013. A judgment in this appeal is expected in 2015.
The available-for-sale financial asset balance sheet value of 260.3 million reflects the market value of the Companys stake in Aer Lingus as of March 31, 2014, as compared to a value of 221.2 million as of March 31, 2013. In accordance with the companys accounting policy, this investment is held at fair value. This investment is classified as available-for-sale, rather than as an investment in an associate, because the Company does not have the power to exercise any influence over Aer Lingus. The increase in the amount of the available for sale financial asset
47
from 221.2 million at March 31, 2013 to 260.3 million at March 31, 2014 is comprised of a gain of 39.1 million, recognized through other comprehensive income, reflecting the increase in Aer Lingus share price from 1.39 per share at March 31, 2013 to 1.64 per share at March 31, 2014. All impairment losses are required to be recognized in the income statement for investments in an equity instrument classified for available for sale and are not subsequently reversed, while gains are recognized through other comprehensive income. The investment had in prior periods been impaired to 0.50 per share.
The Companys determination that it does not have control, or even exercise a significant influence, over Aer Lingus through its minority shareholding has been based on the following factors:
(i) Ryanair does not have any representation on the Aer Lingus Board of Directors; nor does it have a right to appoint a director;
(ii) Ryanair does not participate in Aer Lingus policy-making decisions; nor does it have a right to participate in such policy-making decisions;
(iii) There are no material transactions between Ryanair and Aer Lingus, there is no interchange of personnel between the two companies and there is no sharing of technical information between the companies;
(iv) Aer Lingus and its significant shareholder (the Irish government: 25.1%) have historically openly opposed Ryanairs investment or participation in the company;
(v) In 2007, 2009 and 2010, Aer Lingus refused Ryanairs attempt to assert its statutory right to requisition a general meeting (a legal right of any 5% shareholder under Irish law);
(vi) On April 15, 2011, the High Court in Dublin ruled that Aer Lingus was not obliged to accede to Ryanairs request that two additional resolutions (on the payment of a dividend and on payments to pension schemes) be put to vote at Aer Lingus annual general meeting; and
(vii) The European Commission has formally found that Ryanairs shareholding in Aer Lingus does not grant Ryanair de jure or de facto control of Aer Lingus and that Ryanairs rights as a minority shareholder are associated exclusively to rights related to the protection of minority shareholders (Commission Decision Case No. COMP/M.4439 dated October 11, 2007). The European Commissions finding has been confirmed by the European Unions General Court which issued a decision on July 6, 2010 that the European Commission was justified to use the required legal and factual standard in its refusal to order Ryanair to divest its minority shareholding in Aer Lingus and that, as part of that decision, Ryanairs shareholding did not confer control of Aer Lingus (Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) Case No. T-411/07 dated July 6, 2010).
Historical Results Are Not Predictive of Future Results
The historical results of operations discussed herein may not be indicative of Ryanairs future operating performance. Ryanairs future results of operations will be affected by, among other things, overall passenger traffic volume; the availability of new airports for expansion; fuel prices; the airline pricing environment in a period of increased competition; the ability of Ryanair to finance its planned acquisition of aircraft and to discharge the resulting debt service obligations; economic and political conditions in Ireland, the U.K. and the EU; terrorist threats or attacks within the EU; seasonal variations in travel; developments in government regulations, litigation and labor relations; foreign currency fluctuations, the impact of the banking crisis and potential break-up of the euro; competition and the publics perception regarding the safety of low-fares airlines; the value of its equity stake in Aer Lingus; changes in aircraft acquisition, leasing, and other operating costs; flight interruptions caused by volcanic ash emissions or other atmospheric disruptions; flight disruptions caused by periodic and prolonged air traffic controller strikes in Europe; the rates of income and corporate taxes paid, and the impact of the financial and Eurozone crisis. Ryanair expects its depreciation, staff and fuel charges to increase as additional aircraft and related flight equipment are acquired. Future fuel costs may also increase as a result of the depletion of petroleum reserves, the shortage of fuel production capacity and/or production restrictions imposed by fuel oil producers. Maintenance expenses may also increase as a result of Ryanairs fleet expansion and replacement program. In addition, the financing of new
48
Boeing 737-800 aircraft will increase the total amount of the Companys outstanding debt and the payments it is obliged to make to service such debt. The cost of insurance coverage for certain third-party liabilities arising from acts of war or terrorism increased dramatically following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Although Ryanair currently passes on increased insurance costs to passengers by means of a special insurance levy on each ticket, there can be no assurance that it will continue to be successful in doing so. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsThe 2001 Terrorist Attacks on the United States Had a Severe Negative Impact on the International Airline Industry.
The Companys profit after tax for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 (the first quarter of the Companys 2014 fiscal year) was 196.8 million, as compared to 78.1 million for the corresponding period of the previous year. The Company recorded an increase in operating profit, from 103.3 million in the first quarter of the 2014 fiscal year to 231.8 million in the recently completed quarter. Total operating revenues increased from 1,342.2 million in the first quarter of 2014 to 1,495.7 million in the first quarter of 2015. The increase in operating profit was primarily due to a 9% increase in average fares and a stronger load factor (up 4 points to 86%) and a 2% increase in total operating expenses. Operating expenses increased from 1,238.9 million in the first quarter of 2014 to 1,263.9 million in the first quarter of 2015, due primarily to the 2% decrease in fuel costs and an increase in other operating costs associated with a higher level of activity in line with the growth of the airline. The Companys cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and financial assets with terms of less than three months amounted to 4,483.3 million at June 30, 2014 as compared with 3,592.7 million at June 30, 2013.
The following discussion and analysis of Ryanairs financial condition and results of operations is based on its consolidated financial statements, which are included in Item 18 and prepared in accordance with IFRS.
The preparation of the Companys financial statements requires the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The Company believes that its critical accounting policies, which are those that require managements most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, are those described in this section. These critical accounting policies, the judgments and other uncertainties affecting application of these policies and the sensitivity of reported results to changes in conditions and assumptions are factors to be considered in reviewing the consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 and the discussion and analysis below. For additional detail on these policies, see Note 1, Basis of preparation and significant accounting policies, to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 18.
Long-lived Assets
As of March 31, 2014, Ryanair had 5.1 billion of long-lived assets, virtually all of which were aircraft. In accounting for long-lived assets, Ryanair must make estimates about the expected useful lives of the assets, the expected residual values of the assets, and the potential for impairment based on the fair value of the assets and the cash flows they generate.
In estimating the lives and expected residual values of its aircraft, Ryanair has primarily relied on its own and industry experience, recommendations from Boeing, the manufacturer of all of the Companys aircraft, valuations from appraisers and other available marketplace information. Subsequent revisions to these estimates, which can be significant, could be caused by changes to Ryanairs maintenance program, changes in utilization of the aircraft, governmental regulations on aging of aircraft, changes in new aircraft technology, changes in governmental and environmental taxes, changes in new aircraft fuel efficiency and changing market prices for new
49
and used aircraft of the same or similar types. Ryanair evaluates its estimates and assumptions in each reporting period, and, when warranted, adjusts these assumptions. Generally, these adjustments are accounted for on a prospective basis, through depreciation expense.
Ryanair periodically evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment. Factors that would indicate potential impairment would include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in the market value of an aircraft, a significant change in an aircrafts physical condition and operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the aircraft. While the airline industry as a whole has experienced many of these factors from time to time, Ryanair has not yet been seriously impacted and continues to record positive cash flows from these long-lived assets. Consequently, Ryanair has not yet identified any impairments related to its existing aircraft fleet. The Company will continue to monitor its long-lived assets and the general airline operating environment.
The Companys estimate of the recoverable amount of aircraft residual values is 15% of current market value of new aircraft, determined periodically, based on independent valuations and actual aircraft disposals during prior periods. Aircraft are depreciated over a useful life of 23 years from the date of manufacture to residual value.
Heavy Maintenance
An element of the cost of an acquired aircraft is attributed, on acquisition, to its service potential, reflecting the maintenance condition of the engines and airframe.
For aircraft held under operating lease agreements, Ryanair is contractually committed to either return the aircraft in a certain condition or to compensate the lessor based on the actual condition of the airframe, engines and life-limited parts upon return. In order to fulfill such conditions of the lease, maintenance, in the form of major airframe overhaul, engine maintenance checks, and restitution of major life-limited parts, is required to be performed during the period of the lease and upon return of the aircraft to the lessor. The estimated airframe and engine maintenance costs and the costs associated with the restitution of major life-limited parts, are accrued and charged to profit or loss over the lease term for this contractual obligation, based on the present value of the estimated future cost of the major airframe overhaul, engine maintenance checks and restitution of major life-limited parts, calculated by reference to the number of hours flown or cycles operated during the year.
Ryanairs aircraft operating lease agreements typically have a term of seven years, which closely correlates with the timing of heavy maintenance checks. The contractual obligation to maintain and replenish aircraft held under operating lease exists independently of any future actions within the control of Ryanair. While Ryanair may, in very limited circumstances, sub-lease its aircraft, it remains fully liable to perform all of its contractual obligations under the head lease notwithstanding any such sub-leasing.
Both of these elements of accounting policies involve the use of estimates in determining the quantum of both the initial maintenance asset and/or the amount of provisions to be recorded and the respective periods over which such amounts are charged to income. In making such estimates, Ryanair has primarily relied on its own and industry experience, industry regulations and recommendations from Boeing; however, these estimates can be subject to revision, depending on a number of factors, such as the timing of the planned maintenance, the ultimate utilization of the aircraft, changes to government regulations and increases or decreases in estimated costs. Ryanair evaluates its estimates and assumptions in each reporting period and, when warranted, adjusts its assumptions, which generally impact maintenance and depreciation expense in the income statement on a prospective basis.
Tax Audits
Income tax on the profit or loss for the year comprises current and deferred tax. Current tax payable on taxable profits is recognised as an expense in the period in which the profits arise using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is provided in full, using the balance sheet liability method on temporary differences arising from the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amount in the consolidated financial statements.
50
Social insurance, passenger taxes and sales taxes are recorded as a liability based on laws enacted in the jurisdictions to which they relate. Liabilities are recorded when an obligation has been incurred.
Ryanair reviews its tax obligations by jurisdiction regularly. There are many complexities and judgements in determining tax obligations due to the inherent complexity of tax law, the manner in which airline businesses are carried out whereby operations can begin and end in different jurisdictions and assumptions made about the timing and amount of individual balances to be included in financial statements and tax returns.
Ryanair has an internal tax group and takes professional advice on more complex matters in estimating its tax liabilities. Ryanair also deals extensively with revenue authorities in each jurisdiction in which it operates. Tax liabilities are based on the best estimate of the likely obligation at each reporting period. These estimates are subject to revision based on the outcome of tax audits and discussions with revenue authorities that can take several years to conclude.
The following table sets forth certain income statement data (calculated under IFRS) for Ryanair expressed as a percentage of Ryanairs total revenues for each of the periods indicated:
Fiscal Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
Total revenues |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Scheduled revenues |
75.2 | 78.2 | 79.8 | |||||||||
Ancillary revenues |
24.8 | 21.8 | 20.2 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
86.9 | 85.3 | 84.5 | |||||||||
Fuel and oil |
40.0 | 38.6 | 36.3 | |||||||||
Airport and handling charges |
12.2 | 12.5 | 12.6 | |||||||||
Route charges |
10.4 | 10.0 | 10.5 | |||||||||
Staff costs |
9.2 | 8.9 | 9.5 | |||||||||
Depreciation |
7.0 | 6.7 | 7.0 | |||||||||
Marketing, distribution and other |
3.8 | 4.1 | 4.1 | |||||||||
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
2.3 | 2.5 | 2.4 | |||||||||
Aircraft rentals |
2.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Operating profit |
13.1 | 14.7 | 15.5 | |||||||||
Net interest expense |
(1.3 | ) | (1.5 | ) | (1.5 | ) | ||||||
Other income |
0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Profit before taxation |
11.8 | 13.3 | 14.3 | |||||||||
Taxation |
(1.4 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (1.7 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Profit after taxation |
10.4 | 11.7 | 12.6 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
FISCAL YEAR 2014 COMPARED WITH FISCAL YEAR 2013
Profit after taxation. Ryanair recorded a profit on ordinary activities after taxation of 522.8 million in the 2014 fiscal year, as compared with a profit of 569.3 million in the 2013 fiscal year. This 8.2% decrease was primarily attributable to an increase in total operating expenses of 5.1%, and a 3.7% reduction in average fares, offset, in part, by strong ancillary revenues and increased traffic.
Scheduled revenues. Ryanairs scheduled passenger revenues decreased 0.8%, from 3,819.8 million in the 2013 fiscal year, to 3,789.5 million in the 2014 fiscal year, primarily reflecting a decrease of 3.7% in average fares. The number of passengers booked increased 3.0%, from 79.3 million to 81.7 million, reflecting increased passenger volumes on existing routes and the successful launch of new bases at Athens, Thessaloniki, Brussels (Zaventem), Lisbon, Rome (Fiumicino), Catania, Lamezia and Palermo in the 2014 fiscal year. Booked passenger load factors increased to 83% in fiscal 2014 compared with 82% in fiscal 2013.
51
Passenger capacity during the 2014 fiscal year increased by 2.4% due to an increase in the average number of aircraft in the fleet. Scheduled passenger revenues accounted for 75.2 % of Ryanairs total revenues for the 2014 fiscal year, compared with 78.2% of total revenues in the 2013 fiscal year.
Ancillary revenues. Ryanairs ancillary revenues, which comprise revenues from non-flight scheduled operations, in-flight sales and Internet-related services, increased 17.2%, from 1,064.2 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 1,247.2 million in the 2014 fiscal year, while ancillary revenues per booked passenger increased to 15.27 from 13.43. Revenues from non-flight scheduled operations, including revenues from excess baggage charges, administration/credit card fees, sales of rail and bus tickets, priority boarding, reserved seating, accommodation, travel insurance and car rental increased 21.6% to 1,012.4 million from 832.9 million in the 2013 fiscal year. Revenues from in-flight sales increased 6.8%, to 117.3 million from 109.8 million in the 2013 fiscal year. Revenues from Internet-related services, primarily commissions received from products sold on Ryanair.com or linked websites, decreased 3.3%, from 121.5 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 117.5 million in the 2014 fiscal year, reflecting a combination of factors including an improved product mix and the implementation of a reserved seating system across the network. The rate of increase in ancillary revenues exceeded that of the increase in overall passengers booked.
The following table sets forth the components of ancillary revenues earned by Ryanair and each component expressed as a percentage of total ancillary revenues for each of the periods indicated:
Fiscal Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
(in millions of euro, except percentage data) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-flight Scheduled |
1,012.4 | 81.2 | % | | 832.9 | 78.3 | % | |||||||||
In-flight Sales |
117.3 | 9.4 | % | | 109.8 | 10.3 | % | |||||||||
Internet-related |
117.5 | 9.4 | % | | 121.5 | 11.4 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
1,247.2 | 100.0 | % | | 1,064.2 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses. As a percentage of total revenues, Ryanairs operating expenses increased from 85.3% in the 2013 fiscal year to 86.9% in the 2014 fiscal year. Total revenues increased by 3.1%, slower than the 5.1% increase in operating expenses. In absolute terms, total operating expenses increased 5.1%, from 4,165.8 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 4,378.1 million in the 2014 fiscal year, principally as a result of a 6.8% increase in fuel and oil costs from 1,885.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 2,013.1 million in the 2014 fiscal year, partially offset by the weakening of the U.K. pound sterling to the euro. Airport and handling charges, maintenance, materials and repairs and marketing, distribution and other costs decreased as a percentage of total revenues, while staff costs, depreciation, route charges and fuel and oil expenses increased and aircraft rental expenses stayed constant. Total operating expenses per passenger increased by 2.0%, with the increase reflecting, principally, the increase in passenger capacity during the 2014 fiscal year and the impact of the higher fuel costs.
The Companys decision to ground aircraft did not have a material impact on the results of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2014 and, at present, is not anticipated to have a material impact on future operations. The Company anticipates that any revenues which could have been generated had the Company operated the grounded aircraft would have been lower than the operating costs associated with operating these aircraft, due to significantly higher fuel costs, airport charges and taxes. The Company does not anticipate that any material staff costs will be incurred during future periods of the grounding of aircraft, as the relevant staff can be furloughed under the terms of their contracts without compensation and the maintenance costs associated with the grounded aircraft will be minimal. However, the Company will still incur aircraft ownership costs comprised of depreciation and amortization costs, lease rentals costs and financing costs.
52
The following table sets forth the amounts in euro cent of, and percentage changes in, Ryanairs operating expenses (on a per-passenger basis) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 under IFRS. These data are calculated by dividing the relevant expense amount (as shown in the consolidated financial statements) by the number of booked passengers in the relevant year as shown in the table of Selected Operating and Other Data in Item 3 and rounding to the nearest euro cent; the percentage change is calculated on the basis of the relevant figures before rounding.
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2014 |
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2013 |
% Change | ||||||||||
| | |||||||||||
Fuel and oil |
24.65 | 23.79 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||
Airport and handling charges |
7.56 | 7.71 | (2.1 | %) | ||||||||
Route charges |
6.39 | 6.14 | 4.1 | % | ||||||||
Staff costs |
5.68 | 5.50 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation |
4.31 | 4.16 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||
Marketing, distribution and other |
2.36 | 2.50 | (5.5 | %) | ||||||||
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
1.42 | 1.52 | (6.7 | %) | ||||||||
Aircraft rentals |
1.24 | 1.24 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total operating expenses |
53.61 | 52.56 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel and oil. Ryanairs fuel and oil costs per passenger increased by 3.6%, while in absolute terms, these costs increased by 6.8% from 1,885.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 2,013.1 million in the 2014 fiscal year, in each case after giving effect to the Companys fuel hedging activities. The 6.8% increase reflected a 3.0% increase in average fuel prices paid and the impact of a 7.6% increase in the number of hours flown, which were offset in part by a lower fuel burn across the fleet. Fuel and oil costs include the direct cost of fuel, the cost of delivering fuel to the aircraft, aircraft de-icing and EU emissions trading costs. The average fuel price paid by Ryanair (calculated by dividing total fuel costs by the number of U.S. gallons of fuel consumed) increased 3.0% from 2.38 per U.S. gallon in the 2013 fiscal year to 2.45 per U.S. gallon in the 2014 fiscal year, in each case after giving effect to the Companys fuel hedging activities.
Airport and handling charges and route charges. Ryanairs airport and handling charges per passenger decreased 2.1% in the 2014 fiscal year, while route charges per passenger increased 4.1%. In absolute terms, airport and handling charges increased 0.9%, from 611.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 617.2 million in the 2014 fiscal year, reflecting the overall growth in passenger volumes, increased charges in Spain, and a quadrupling of ATC charges in Italy during the summer, partially offset by the mix of new route and bases launched and the weakening of U.K. pound sterling against the euro. In absolute terms, route charges increased 7.3%, from 486.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year, to 522.0 million in the 2014 fiscal year, primarily as a result of the 2% increase in sectors flown.
Staff costs. Ryanairs staff costs, which consist primarily of salaries, wages and benefits, increased 3.3% on a per-passenger basis, while in absolute terms, these costs increased 6.4%, from 435.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 463.6 million in the 2014 fiscal year. The increase in absolute terms was primarily attributable to a 7.6% increase in hours flown and a pay increase of 2.0% granted in fiscal 2014, partially offset by the weakening of U.K. pound sterling against the euro.
Depreciation. Ryanairs depreciation per passenger increased by 3.6%, while in absolute terms these costs increased 6.7% from 329.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 351.8 million in the 2014 fiscal year. The increase was primarily attributable to the increase in the average number of owned aircraft in the fleet in the 2014 fiscal year (246) compared to the 2013 fiscal year (242) and spare engines purchased during the year. See Critical Accounting PoliciesLong-lived Assets above.
Marketing, distribution and other expenses. Ryanairs marketing, distribution and other operating expenses, including those applicable to the generation of ancillary revenues, decreased 5.5% on a per-passenger basis in the
53
2014 fiscal year, while in absolute terms, these costs decreased 2.6%, from 197.9 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 192.8 million in the 2014 fiscal year, with the overall decrease primarily reflecting the reduced marketing spend per passenger and lower ancillary revenue costs.
Maintenance, materials and repairs. Ryanairs maintenance, materials and repair expenses, which consist primarily of the cost of routine maintenance, provision for leased aircraft and the overhaul of spare parts, decreased 6.7% on a per-passenger basis, while in absolute terms these expenses decreased by 3.8% from 120.7 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 116.1 million in the 2014 fiscal year. The decrease in absolute terms during the fiscal year reflected improved terms on lease extensions, offset in part by costs arising from the increased level of activity.
Aircraft rentals. Aircraft rental expenses amounted to 101.5 million in the 2014 fiscal year, a 3.4% increase from the 98.2 million reported in the 2013 fiscal year, reflecting the negative impact of higher lessor financing costs and the adverse impact of changes in the euro/dollar exchange rate.
Operating profit. As a result of the factors outlined above, operating profit decreased 11.0% on a per-passenger basis in the 2014 fiscal year, and also decreased in absolute terms, from 718.2 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 658.6 million in the 2014 fiscal year.
Finance expense. Ryanairs interest and similar charges decreased 16.2%, from 99.3 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 83.2 million in the 2014 fiscal year, primarily due to lower interest rates and reduced level of debt in the 2014 fiscal year compared to the 2013 fiscal year. These costs are expected to increase in future periods as Ryanair further expands its fleet.
Finance income. Ryanairs interest and similar income decreased 39.8%, from 27.4 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 16.5 million in the 2014 fiscal year, reflecting lower interest rates and gross cash balances, partially offset by increased dividend income from Aer Lingus shares received in the 2014 fiscal year.
Foreign exchange gains/losses. Ryanair recorded foreign exchange losses of 0.5 million in the 2014 fiscal year, as compared with foreign exchange gains of 4.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year, with the different result being primarily due to the negative impact of changes in the euro exchange rate against the U.K. pound sterling.
Taxation. The effective tax rate for the 2014 fiscal year was 11.6%, as compared to an effective tax rate of 12.5% in the 2013 fiscal year. The effective tax rate reflects the statutory rate of Irish corporation tax of 12.5%. Ryanair recorded an income tax provision of 68.6 million in the 2014 fiscal year, compared with a tax provision of 81.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year, with the decrease primarily reflecting lower pre-tax profits. The determination regarding the recoverability of the deferred tax asset was based on future income forecasts, which demonstrated that it was more likely than not that future profits would be available in order to utilize the deferred tax asset. A deferred tax assets recoverability is not dependent on material improvements over historical levels of pre-tax income, material changes in the present relationship between income reported for financial and tax purposes, or material asset sales or other non-routine transactions.
FISCAL YEAR 2013 COMPARED WITH FISCAL YEAR 2012
Profit after taxation. Ryanair recorded a profit on ordinary activities after taxation of 569.3 million in the 2013 fiscal year, as compared with a profit of 560.4 million in the 2012 fiscal year. This 1.6% increase was primarily attributable to an increase in revenues driven by a 4.3% increase in average fares and a 20.1% increase in ancillary revenues, partially offset by a 18.3% increase in fuel and oil costs from 1,593.6 million to 1,885.6 million. The result in fiscal 2012 included 57.8 million, net of tax, relating to a one off release of ticket sales revenue due to a change in accounting estimates arising in enhancements to Ryanairs revenue accounting system.
Scheduled revenues. Ryanairs scheduled passenger revenues increased 9.0%, from 3,504.0 million in the 2012 fiscal year, to 3,819.8 million in the 2013 fiscal year, primarily reflecting an increase of 4.3% in average fares. The number of passengers booked increased 4.5%, from 75.8 million to 79.3 million, reflecting increased passenger volumes on existing routes and the successful launch of new bases at Chania, Eindhoven, Fez, Krakow, Maastricht, Marrakech and Zadar in the 2013 fiscal year. Booked passenger load factors remained flat at 82% in both fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013.
54
Passenger capacity during the 2013 fiscal year increased by 4.7% due to the addition of 11 Boeing 737-800 aircraft (net of lease handbacks). Scheduled passenger revenues accounted for 78.2 % of Ryanairs total revenues for the 2013 fiscal year, compared with 79.8% of total revenues in the 2012 fiscal year.
During fiscal year 2012, changes in estimates relating to the timing of revenue recognition for unused passenger tickets were made, resulting in increased revenue in the 2012 fiscal year of 65.3 million. This change reflects more accurate and timely data obtained through system enhancements.
Ancillary revenues. Ryanairs ancillary revenues, which comprise revenues from non-flight scheduled operations, in-flight sales and Internet-related services, increased 20.1%, from 886.2 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 1,064.2 million in the 2013 fiscal year, while ancillary revenues per booked passenger increased to 13.43 from 11.69. Revenues from non-flight scheduled operations, including revenues from excess baggage charges, administration/credit card fees, sales of rail and bus tickets, priority boarding, reserved seating, accommodation, travel insurance and car rental increased 23.0% to 832.9 million from 677.4 million in the 2012 fiscal year. Revenues from in-flight sales increased 2. 8%, to 109.8 million from 106.7 million in the 2012 fiscal year. Revenues from Internet-related services, primarily commissions received from products sold on Ryanair.com or linked websites, increased 19.0%, from 102.1 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 121.5 million in the 2013 fiscal year. The rate of increase in revenues from all ancillary revenue categories exceeded that of the increase in overall passengers booked.
The following table sets forth the components of ancillary revenues earned by Ryanair and each component expressed as a percentage of total ancillary revenues for each of the periods indicated:
Fiscal Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||
(in millions of euro, except percentage data) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-flight Scheduled |
| 832.9 | 78.3 | % | | 677.4 | 76.4 | % | ||||||||
In-flight Sales |
| 109.8 | 10.3 | % | | 106.7 | 12.0 | % | ||||||||
Internet-related |
| 121.5 | 11.4 | % | | 102.1 | 11.5 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
| 1,064.2 | 100.0 | % | | 886.2 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses. As a percentage of total revenues, Ryanairs operating expenses increased from 84.5% in the 2012 fiscal year to 85.3% in the 2013 fiscal year, as total revenues increased by 11.2%, slower than the 12.4% increase in operating expenses. In absolute terms, total operating expenses increased 12.4%, from 3,707.0 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 4,165.8 million in the 2013 fiscal year, principally as a result of an 18.3% increase in fuel and oil costs from 1,593.6 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 1,885.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year. Staff costs, depreciation, aircraft rental expenses, route charges, airport handling charges and marketing, distribution and other costs decreased as a percentage of total revenues, while maintenance and fuel and oil expenses increased. Total operating expenses per passenger increased by 7.5%, with the increase reflecting, principally, the increase in passenger capacity during the 2013 fiscal year and the impact of the higher fuel costs.
The Companys decision to ground aircraft did not have a material impact on the results of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2013 and, at present, is not anticipated to have a material impact on future operations. The Company anticipates that any revenues which could have been generated had the Company operated the grounded aircraft would have been lower than the operating costs associated with operating these aircraft, due to significantly higher fuel costs, airport charges and taxes. The Company does not anticipate that any material staff costs will be incurred during future periods of the grounding of aircraft, as the relevant staff can be furloughed under the terms of their contracts without compensation and the maintenance costs associated with the grounded aircraft will be minimal. However, the Company will still incur aircraft ownership costs comprised of depreciation and amortization costs, lease rentals costs and financing costs.
55
The following table sets forth the amounts in euro cent of, and percentage changes in, Ryanairs operating expenses (on a per-passenger basis) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012 under IFRS. These data are calculated by dividing the relevant expense amount (as shown in the consolidated financial statements) by the number of booked passengers in the relevant year as shown in the table of Selected Operating and Other Data in Item 3 and rounding to the nearest euro cent; the percentage change is calculated on the basis of the relevant figures before rounding.
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2013 |
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2012 |
% Change | ||||||||||
| | |||||||||||
Fuel and oil |
23.79 | 21.02 | 13.2 | % | ||||||||
Airport and handling charges |
7.71 | 7.31 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||
Route charges |
6.14 | 6.08 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||
Staff costs |
5.50 | 5.47 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation |
4.16 | 4.08 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
Marketing, distribution and other |
2.50 | 2.37 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
1.52 | 1.37 | 11.0 | % | ||||||||
Aircraft rentals |
1.24 | 1.20 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total operating expenses |
52.56 | 48.90 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel and oil. Ryanairs fuel and oil costs per passenger increased by 13.2%, while in absolute terms, these costs increased by 18.3% from 1,593.6 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 1,884.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year, in each case after giving effect to the Companys fuel hedging activities. The 18.3% increase reflected a 15% increase in average fuel prices paid and the impact of a 3.7% increase in the number of hours flown, which were offset in part by a 2.2% decrease in the average sector length. Fuel and oil costs include the direct cost of fuel, the cost of delivering fuel to the aircraft, aircraft de-icing and EU emissions trading costs. The average fuel price paid by Ryanair (calculated by dividing total fuel costs by the number of U.S. gallons of fuel consumed) increased 14.4% from 2.08 per U.S. gallon in the 2012 fiscal year to 2.38 per U.S. gallon in the 2013 fiscal year, in each case after giving effect to the Companys fuel hedging activities.
Airport and handling charges and route charges. Ryanairs airport and handling charges per passenger increased 5.6%, while route charges per passenger increased 1.1% in the 2013 fiscal year. In absolute terms, airport and handling charges increased 10.4%, from 554.0 million in the 2012 fiscal year, to 611.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year, reflecting the overall growth in passenger volumes and higher charges at Dublin and London (Stansted) airports, partially offset by lower average costs at Ryanairs newer airports and bases. In absolute terms, route charges increased 5.7%, from 460.5 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 486.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year, primarily as a result of the 4.7% increase in sectors flown.
Staff costs. Ryanairs staff costs, which consist primarily of salaries, wages and benefits, increased 0.4% on a per-passenger basis, while in absolute terms, these costs increased 5.0%, from 415.0 million in the 2013 fiscal year to 435.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year. The increase in absolute terms was primarily attributable to a 3.7% increase in hours flown and a flight crew pay increase of 2% granted in fiscal 2013.
Depreciation. Ryanairs depreciation per passenger increased by 2.0%, while in absolute terms these costs increased 6.6% from 309.2 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 329.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year. The increase was primarily attributable to the addition of 11 owned aircraft to the fleet during the 2013 fiscal year. See Critical Accounting PoliciesLong-lived Assets above.
Marketing, distribution and other expenses. Ryanairs marketing, distribution and other operating expenses, including those applicable to the generation of ancillary revenues, increased 5.2% on a per-passenger basis in the 2013 fiscal year, while in absolute terms, these costs increased 9.9%, from 180.0 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 197.9 million in the 2013 fiscal year, with the overall increase primarily reflecting the higher level of activity and increased onboard product costs reflecting the higher level of sales.
56
Maintenance, materials and repairs. Ryanairs maintenance, materials and repair expenses, which consist primarily of the cost of routine maintenance, provision for leased aircraft and the overhaul of spare parts, increased 11.0% on a per-passenger basis, while in absolute terms these expenses increased by 16.0% from 104.0 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 120.7 million in the 2013 fiscal year. The increase in absolute terms during the fiscal year reflected the additional costs arising from increased level of activity and the opening of new bases.
Aircraft rentals. Aircraft rental expenses amounted to 98.2 million in the 2013 fiscal year, an 8.2% increase from the 90.7 million reported in the 2012 fiscal year, reflecting the negative impact of higher lessor financing costs and the adverse impact of changes in the euro/dollar exchange rate on new leased aircraft and the handback of 4 aircraft due to the maturity of leases.
Operating profit. As a result of the factors outlined above, operating profit increased 0.6% on a per-passenger basis in the 2013 fiscal year, and also increased in absolute terms, from 683.2 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 718.2 million in the 2013 fiscal year.
Finance expense. Ryanairs interest and similar charges decreased 9.0%, from 109.2 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 99.3 million in the 2013 fiscal year, primarily due to lower interest rates in the 2013 fiscal year compared to the 2012 fiscal year. These costs are expected to increase as Ryanair further expands its fleet.
Finance income. Ryanairs interest and similar income decreased 38.2%, from 44.3 million in the 2012 fiscal year to 27.4 million in the 2013 fiscal year, reflecting the reduced yields on term deposits.
Foreign exchange gains/losses. Ryanair recorded foreign exchange gains of 4.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year, as compared with foreign exchange gains of 4.3 million in the 2012 fiscal year, with the different result being primarily due to the positive impact of changes in the U.K. pound sterling and the U.S. dollar exchange rates against the euro.
Taxation. The effective tax rate for the 2013 fiscal year was 12.5%, as compared to an effective tax rate of 11.5% in the 2012 fiscal year. The effective tax rate reflects the statutory rate of Irish corporation tax of 12.5%. Ryanair recorded an income tax provision of 81.6 million in the 2013 fiscal year, compared with a tax provision of 72.6 million in the 2012 fiscal year, with the increase primarily reflecting higher pre-tax profits. The determination regarding the recoverability of the deferred tax asset was based on future income forecasts, which demonstrated that it was more likely than not that future profits would be available in order to utilize the deferred tax asset. A deferred tax assets recoverability is not dependent on material improvements over historical levels of pre-tax income, material changes in the present relationship between income reported for financial and tax purposes, or material asset sales or other non-routine transactions.
The Companys results of operations have varied significantly from quarter to quarter, and management expects these variations to continue. Among the factors causing these variations are the airline industrys sensitivity to general economic conditions and the seasonal nature of air travel. Ryanair typically records higher revenues and income in the first half of each fiscal year ended March 31 than the second half of such year.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Please see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 for information on recently issued accounting standards that are material to the Company.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity. The Company finances its working capital requirements through a combination of cash generated from operations, debt capital market issuances and bank loans for the acquisition of aircraft. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyThe Company Will Incur Significant Costs Acquiring New Aircraft and Any Instability in the Credit and Capital Markets could Negatively Impact Ryanairs Ability to
57
Obtain Financing on Acceptable Terms for more information about risks relating to liquidity and capital resources. The Company had cash and liquid resources at March 31, 2014 and 2013 of 3,241.7 million and 3,559.0 million, respectively. The decrease at March 31, 2014 primarily reflects cash generated from operating activities of 1,044.6 million, which was offset by the cash used to fund the purchase of 69.5 million Ordinary Shares via a share buy-back costing 481.7 million, as well as the purchase of property, plant, and equipmentprimarily pre-delivery payments on new Boeing 737-800 aircraft, spare engines and the repayment of 390.8 million of borrowings. Cash and liquid resources included 13.3 million and 24.7 million in restricted cash held on deposit as collateral for certain derivative financial instruments entered into by the Company with respect to its aircraft financing obligations and other banking arrangements at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. See Item 8. Financial InformationOther Financial InformationLegal Proceedings.
The Companys net cash inflows from operating activities in the 2014 and 2013 fiscal years amounted to 1,044.6 million and 1,023.5 million, respectively. The 21.1 million increase in net cash flows from operating activities for fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013 was principally due to a number of factors including an increase in accrued expenses. This movement, which primarily relates to cash received in advance for flights, and receipt of other receivables and increases in other payables balances, generated 133.9 million in cash in 2014, compared with 67.4 million in 2013. This increase in net cash generated from working capital of 66.5 million, or approximately 98.7%, is primarily due to the an increase in cash receipts from advance bookings, some of which is due to the timing of Easter which fell in April 2014.
During the last two fiscal years, Ryanairs primary cash requirements have been for operating expenses, additional aircraft, including advance payments in respect of new Boeing 737-800s and related flight equipment, payments on related indebtedness and payments of corporation tax, as well as share buy-backs of 549.2 million and the payment of a 491.5 million special dividend to shareholders. Cash generated from operations has been the principal source for these cash requirements, supplemented primarily by aircraft-related bank loans.
The Companys net cash inflows from operating activities in the 2013 and 2012 fiscal years amounted to 1,023.5 million and 1,020.3 million, respectively. The 3.2 million increase in net cash flows from operating activities for fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal 2012 was principally due to a number of factors including a 493.8 million increase in operating revenues, due to a combination of a 4.3% increase in average fares, a 4.5% increase in booked passengers and a 20.1% increase in ancillary revenues, partially offset by a 291.0 million, or 18.3%, increase in fuel and oil costs, due to the increase in the level of activity and increases in the average price of fuel, and a 146.4 million, or 8.1%, increase in non-fuel related operating expenses (excluding a 20.4 million, or 6.6%, increase in non-cash depreciation) due to the growth of the business. In addition, movements in working capital, related principally to cash received in advance for flights, and receipt of other receivables and increases in other payables balances, generated 67.4 million in cash in 2013, compared with 101.8 million in 2012. This decrease in net cash generated from working capital of 34.4 million, or approximately 34%, is primarily due to the timing of Easter, which led to lower future fly revenues at year end.
The Companys net cash inflows from investing activities in fiscal year 2014 totaled 300.7 million, primarily reflecting, as compared to fiscal year 2013, the Companys decreased investment of cash with maturities of greater than three months, as described in more detail below
The Companys net cash used in investing activities in fiscal years 2013 and 2012 totaled 1,821.5 million and 185.4 million, respectively, primarily reflecting the Companys capital expenditures, and increased investment of cash with maturities of greater than three months, as described in more detail below.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled 856.1 million in the 2014 fiscal year, largely reflecting the repayments of long-term borrowings of 390.8 million and shares purchased under a share buy-back program of 481.7 million, offset in part by shares issued of 16.4 million. Net cash used in financing activities totaled 669.4 million in fiscal year 2013. This was due to the receipt of proceeds from long term borrowings of 234.6 million and shares issued of 21.4 million, offset in part by repayments of long-term borrowings of 366.4 million, the payment of a 491.5 million dividend and shares purchased under a share buy-back program of 67.5 million.
58
The Company experienced a net cash outflow from financing activities of 154.9 million in fiscal year 2012. This was due to the receipt of proceeds from long term borrowings of 292.3 million being more than offset by repayments of long-term borrowings of 329.7 million and the expenditure of 124.6 million under the share buy-back program.
Capital Expenditures. The Companys net cash outflows for capital expenditures in fiscal years 2014 and 2013 were 505.8 million and 310.7 million, respectively. Ryanair has funded a significant portion of its acquisition of new Boeing 737-800 aircraft and related equipment through borrowings under facilities provided by international financial institutions on the basis of guarantees issued by the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank). At March 31, 2014, Ryanair had a fleet of 297 Boeing 737-800 aircraft, the majority of which (210 aircraft) were funded by Ex-Im Bank-guaranteed financing. Other sources of on-balance-sheet aircraft financing utilized by Ryanair are Japanese Operating Leases with Call Options (JOLCOs), which are treated as finance leases (30 of the aircraft in the fleet as of March 31, 2014) and commercial debt financing (6 of the aircraft in the fleet as of March 31, 2014). Of Ryanairs total fleet of 297 Boeing 737-800 aircraft at March 31, 2014 there were 51 aircraft which were financed through operating lease arrangements. Ryanair has generally been able to generate sufficient funds from operations to meet its non-aircraft acquisition-related working capital requirements. Management believes that the working capital available to the Company is sufficient for its present requirements and will be sufficient to meet its anticipated requirements for capital expenditures and other cash requirements for the 2015 fiscal year.
The Companys net cash outflows for capital expenditures in fiscal year 2012 was 290.4 million. Of the 25 new Boeing 737-800 aircraft which Ryanair took delivery of between April 1, 2011 and March 31, 2012, 11 were financed through sale-and-leaseback financings and the remainder through Ex-Im Bank guaranteed-financing.
The following table sets forth the dates on which and the number of aircraft that will be delivered to the Company pursuant to the 2013 Boeing Contract:
Fiscal Year End |
Mar 31, 2014 |
Mar 31, 2015 |
Mar 31, 2016 |
Mar 31, 2017 |
Mar 31, 2018 |
Mar 31, 2019 |
Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||
Opening Fleet |
305 | 297 | 308 | 343 | 371 | 403 | 305 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Aircraft delivered |
0 | 11 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 29 | 180 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Planned lease returns/disposals |
(8 | ) | | (5 | ) | (22 | ) | (18 | ) | (6 | ) | (59 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Closing Fleet |
297 | 308 | 343 | 371 | 403 | 426 | 426 |
Capital Resources. Ryanairs long-term debt (including current maturities) totaled 3,083.6 million at March 31, 2014 and 3,498.3 million at March 31, 2013, with the change being primarily attributable to the repayment of existing debt facilities. Please see the table Obligations Due by Period below for more information on Ryanairs long-term debt (including current maturities) and finance leases as of March 31, 2014. See also Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 for further information on the maturity profile of the interest rate structure and other information on, the Companys borrowings.
At March 31, 2014, the majority of the aircraft in Ryanairs fleet had been financed through loan facilities with various financial institutions active in the structured export finance sector and supported by a loan guarantee from Ex-Im Bank. Each of these facilities takes essentially the same form and is based on the documentation developed by Ryanair and Ex-Im Bank, which follows standard market forms for this type of financing. In November 2010, Ryanair financed seven aircraft through a U.S. dollar-denominated Ex-Im Bank Capital Markets Product (Eximbond). The Eximbond has essentially the same characteristics as all previous Ex-Im Bank guaranteed financings with no additional obligations on Ryanair. On the basis of an Ex-Im Bank guarantee with regard to the financing of up to 85% of the eligible U.S. and foreign content represented in the net purchase price of the relevant aircraft, the financial institution investor enters into a commitment letter with the Company to provide financing for a specified number of aircraft benefiting from such guarantee; loans are then drawn down as the aircraft are delivered and payments to Boeing become due. Each of the loans under the facilities are on substantially similar terms, having a maturity of 12 years from the drawdown date and being secured by a first priority mortgage in favor of a security trustee on behalf of Ex-Im Bank.
59
Through the use of interest rate swaps or cross currency interest rate swaps, Ryanair has effectively converted a portion of its floating-rate debt under its financing facilities into fixed-rate debt. Approximately 34% of the loans for the aircraft acquired under the above facilities are not covered by such swaps and have therefore remained at floating rates linked to EURIBOR, with the interest rate exposure from these loans largely hedged by placing a similar amount of cash on deposit at floating interest rates. The net result is that Ryanair has effectively swapped or drawn down fixed-rate euro-denominated debt with maturities between seven and twelve years in respect of approximately 66% of its outstanding debt financing at March 31, 2014 and of this total approximately 48% of this debt has been partially swapped, with the relevant swaps covering the first seven years of the twelve-year amortizing period.
The table below illustrates the effect of swap transactions (each of which is with an established international financial counterparty) on the profile of Ryanairs total outstanding debt at March 31, 2014. See Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskInterest Rate Exposure and Hedging for additional details on the Companys hedging transactions.
At March 31, 2014 | EUR | EUR | ||||||
Fixed | Floating | |||||||
(in millions of euro) | ||||||||
Borrowing profile before swap transactions |
945.1 | 2,138.5 | ||||||
Interest rate swaps Debt swapped from floating to fixed |
1,098.9 | (1,098.9 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Borrowing profile after swap transactions |
2,044.0 | 1,039.6 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average interest rate on the cumulative borrowings under these facilities of 3,083.6 million at March 31, 2014 was 2.49%. Ryanairs ability to obtain additional loans pursuant to each of the facilities to finance the price of future Boeing 737-800 aircraft purchases is subject to the issuance of further bank commitments and the satisfaction of various contractual conditions. In addition, as a result of the Company obtaining a BBB+ (stable) credit rating from Standard & Poors and Fitch Ratings and following Ryanairs recent issuance in June 2014 of an unsecured eurobond in the amount of 850.0 million with a coupon of 1.875% with a tenor of 7 years that are guaranteed by Ryanair Holdings, the Company may decide in the future to issue additional debt from through the capital markets to finance future aircraft deliveries. These conditions include, among other things, the execution of satisfactory documentation, the requirement that Ryanair perform all of its obligations under the Boeing agreements and provide satisfactory security interests in the aircraft (and related assets) in favor of the lenders and Ex-Im Bank, and that Ryanair not suffer a material adverse change in its conditions or prospects (financial or otherwise).
As part of its Ex-Im Bank guarantee-based financing of the Boeing 737-800s, Ryanair has entered into certain lease agreements and related arrangements. Pursuant to these arrangements, legal title to the 210 aircraft delivered and remaining in the fleet as of March 31, 2014 rests with a number of United States special purpose vehicles (the SPVs). The SPVs are the borrowers of record under the loans made or to be made under the facilities, with all of their obligations under the loans being guaranteed by Ryanair Holdings.
These Aircraft are financed using a standard Ex-Im Bank orphan ownership structure. The shares of the SPVs (which are owned by an unrelated charitable association and not by Ryanair) are in turn pledged to a security trustee in favor of Ex-Im Bank and the lenders. Ryanair operates each of the aircraft pursuant to a finance lease it has entered into with the SPVs, the terms of which mirror those of the relevant loans under the facilities. Ryanair has the right to purchase the aircraft upon termination of the lease for a nominal amount. Pursuant to this arrangement, Ryanair is considered to own the aircraft for accounting purposes under IFRS. Ryanair does not use special purpose entities for off-balance sheet financing or any other purpose which results in assets or liabilities not being reflected in Ryanairs consolidated financial statements. In addition to its purchase option under the finance lease, Ryanair is entitled to receive the balance of any proceeds received in respect of the aircraft that remain after Ex-Im Bank and the lenders are paid what they are owed under the loan guarantees.
60
Ryanair has a track record in securing finance for similar sized aircraft purchases. The 1998, 2002, 2003 and 2005 Boeing Contracts totaling 348 aircraft were financed with approximately 66% US Ex-Im Bank loan guarantees and capital markets (with 85% loan to value) financing, 24% through sale and operating leaseback financing, and 10% through Japanese operating leases with call options (JOLCOs). See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsLiquidity and Capital Resources.
Under the new Aviation Sector Understanding which came into effect from January 1, 2013, the fees payable to Ex-Im Bank for the provision of loan guarantees have significantly increased, thereby making it more expensive than more traditional forms of financing. As a result, Ryanair intends to finance the New Aircraft obtained under the 2013 Boeing Contract through a combination of internally generated cash flows, debt financing from commercial banks, debt financing through the capital markets in a secured and unsecured manner, commercial debt through JOLCOs and sale and operating leasebacks. These forms of financing are generally accepted in the aviation industry and are currently widely available for companies who have the credit quality of Ryanair. Ryanair may periodically use Ex-Im Bank loan guarantees when appropriate. Ryanair intends to finance pre-delivery payments (Aircraft Deposits) to Boeing in respect of the New Aircraft via internally generated cash flows similar to all previous Aircraft Deposit payments.
At March 31, 2014, Ryanair had 51 operating lease aircraft in the fleet. As a result, Ryanair operates, but does not own, these aircraft, which were leased to provide flexibility for the aircraft delivery program. Ryanair has no right or obligation to acquire these aircraft at the end of the relevant lease terms. 18 leases are denominated in euro and require Ryanair to make fixed rental payments over the term of the lease. The remaining 33 operating leases are U.S. dollar-denominated and require Ryanair to make fixed rental payments. The Company has an option to extend the initial period of seven years on 34 of the 51 remaining operating lease aircraft as at March 31, 2014 on pre-determined terms. This includes 3 operating lease arrangements which are due to mature during the year ended March 31, 2015 but have been extended for a further 7 years. In addition to the above, the Company financed 30 of the Boeing 737-800 aircraft delivered between March 2005 and March 2014 with 13-year euro-denominated JOLCOs. These structures are accounted for as finance leases and are initially recorded at fair value in the Companys balance sheet. Under each of these contracts, Ryanair has a call option to purchase the aircraft at a pre-determined price after a period of 10.5 years, which it may exercise. Six aircraft have been financed through euro-denominated 12-year amortizing commercial debt transactions.
Since, under each of the Companys operating leases, the Company has a commitment to maintain the relevant aircraft, an accounting provision is made during the lease term for this obligation based on estimated future costs of major airframe, engine maintenance checks and restitution of major life limited parts by making appropriate charges to the income statement calculated by reference to the number of hours or cycles operated during the year. Under IFRS, the accounting treatment for these costs with respect to leased aircraft differs from that for aircraft owned by the Company, for which such costs are capitalized and amortized.
Ryanair recently obtained a BBB+ (stable) corporate rating from both Standard & Poors and Fitch Ratings and established a 3 billion EMTN program. In June 2014, Ryanair issued 850.0 million in unsecured eurobonds with a 7 year tenor at a coupon of 1.875% under this program that are guaranteed by Ryanair Holdings. The Company intends to use the proceeds from this issuance for general corporate purposes, including the financing of aircraft.
Contractual Obligations. The table below sets forth the contractual obligations and commercial commitments of the Company with definitive payment terms, which will require significant cash outlays in the future, as of March 31, 2014. These obligations primarily relate to Ryanairs aircraft purchase and related financing obligations, which are described in more detail above, and do not reflect the 850.0 million in eurobonds issued in June 2014. For additional information on the Companys contractual obligations and commercial commitments, see Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 18.
The amounts listed under Finance Lease Obligations reflect the Companys obligations under its JOLCOs. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsLiquidity and Capital Resources.
61
The amounts listed under Purchase Obligations in the table reflect obligations for aircraft purchases and are calculated by multiplying the number of aircraft the Company is obligated to purchase under its current agreements with Boeing during the relevant period by the Basic Price for each aircraft pursuant to the relevant contract, with the dollar-denominated Basic Price being converted into euro at an exchange rate of $1.3788 =1.00 (based on the European Central Bank Rate on March 31, 2014). The relevant amounts therefore exclude the effect of the price concessions granted to Ryanair by Boeing and CFM, as well as any application of the Escalation Factor described below. As a result, Ryanairs actual expenditures for aircraft during the relevant periods will be lower than the amounts listed under Purchase Obligations in the table.
With respect to purchase obligations under the terms of the 2013 Boeing Contract, the Company was required to pay Boeing 1% of the Basic Price of each of the 175 firm-order Boeing 737-800 aircraft at the time the contract was signed in April 2013 (such deposit being fully refundable if the Company had not received the shareholder approval it received at an extraordinary general meeting on June 18, 2013), and will be required to make periodic advance payments of the purchase price for each aircraft it has agreed to purchase during the course of the two-year period preceding the delivery of each aircraft. As a result of these required advance payments, the Company will have paid up to 30% of the Basic Price of each aircraft prior to its delivery (including the addition of an estimated Escalation Factor but before deduction of any credit memoranda and other concessions); the balance of the net price is due at the time of delivery. Similar terms applied under the 2005 Boeing contract, with the first payment due when the contract was signed in February 2005.
The amounts listed under Operating Lease Obligations reflect the Companys obligations under its aircraft operating lease arrangements.
Obligations Due by Period
Contractual Obligations |
Total | Less than 1 year |
1-2 years | 2-5 years | After 5 years | |||||||||||||||
(in millions of euro) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term Debt (a) |
2,366.8 | 352.7 | 334.4 | 908.3 | 771.4 | |||||||||||||||
Finance Lease Obligations |
716.8 | 115.2 | 49.8 | 369.2 | 182.6 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase Obligations (b) |
10,246.7 | 626.2 | 2,277.0 | 7,343.5 | | |||||||||||||||
Operating Lease Obligations |
472.7 | 118.7 | 89.9 | 202.2 | 61.9 | |||||||||||||||
Future Interest Payments (c) |
281.6 | 68.4 | 57.3 | 103.5 | 52.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Contractual Obligations |
| 14,084.6 | | 1,281.2 | | 2,808.4 | | 8,926.7 | | 1,068.3 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | For additional information on Ryanairs long-term debt obligations, see Note 11 and Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 18. |
(b) | These are noted at a non-discounted list price. |
(c) | In determining an appropriate methodology to estimate future interest payments we have applied either the applicable fixed rate or currently applicable variable rate where appropriate. These interest rates are subject to change and amounts actually due may be higher or lower than noted in the table above. |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTIONS
Ryanair uses certain off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of business, including financial guarantees and operating lease commitments. Details of each of these arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources are discussed below.
Operating Lease Commitments. The Company has entered into a number of sale-and-leaseback transactions in connection with the financing of a number of aircraft in its fleet. See Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital Resources above for additional information on these transactions.
62
Guarantees. Ryanair Holdings has provided an aggregate of 4,805.4 million in letters of guarantee to secure obligations of certain of its subsidiaries in respect of loans and bank advances, including those relating to aircraft financing and related hedging transactions. This amount excludes guarantees given in relation to the 2013 Boeing Contract which total approximately $14.1 billion at list prices and which became effective following Ryanair Holdings shareholder approval at an extraordinary general meeting on June 18, 2013. In addition, Ryanair Holdings guarantees the 850.0 million eurobond issuance in June 2014 (maturing in June 2021).
For information concerning the principal trends and uncertainties affecting the Companys results of operations and financial condition, see Item 3. Key InformationRisk Factors, Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsBusiness Overview, Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources and Item 4. Information on the CompanyStrategyResponding to Current Challenges above.
Inflation did not have a significant effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition during the three fiscal years ended March 31, 2014.
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
Ryanair Holdings was established in 1996 as a holding company for Ryanair. The management of Ryanair Holdings and Ryanair are integrated, with the two companies having the same directors and executive officers.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the directors of Ryanair Holdings and Ryanair as of July 25, 2014:
Name |
Age | Positions | ||
David Bonderman (a)(b) |
71 | Chairman and Director | ||
Michael Horgan (d) |
77 | Director | ||
Charles McCreevy (c) |
64 | Director | ||
Declan McKeon (c) |
63 | Director | ||
Kyran McLaughlin (a)(b) |
70 | Director | ||
Dick Milliken (c) |
63 | Director | ||
Michael OLeary (a)(b)(f) |
53 | Director and CEO | ||
Julie ONeill (e) |
59 | Director | ||
James Osborne (a)(e) |
65 | Director | ||
Louise Phelan (e) |
47 | Director |
(a) | Member of the Executive Committee. |
(b) | Member of the Nomination Committee. |
(c) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(d) | Member of the Air Safety Committee. |
(e) | Member of the Remuneration Committee. |
(f) | Mr. OLeary is also the chief executive officer of Ryanair Holdings and Ryanair. None of the other directors are executive officers of Ryanair Holdings or Ryanair. |
David Bonderman (Chairman). David Bonderman has served as a director since August 1996 and has served as the chairman of the Board of Directors since December 1996. Mr. Bonderman also serves on the Boards of the following public companies: Caesars Entertainment Corporation and CoStar Group, Inc. He also serves on the Supervisory Board for VTB Bank. In addition, he serves on the Boards of The Wilderness Society, the Grand Canyon Trust, and the American Himalayan Foundation and is a U.S. citizen.
63
Michael Horgan (Director). Michael Horgan has served as a director since January 2001. A former Chief Pilot of Aer Lingus, he has acted as a consultant to a number of international airlines, civil aviation authorities, the European Commission and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Mr. Horgan is the Chairman of the Companys Air Safety Committee and is an Irish citizen.
Charles McCreevy (Director). Charles McCreevy has served as a director since May 2010. Mr. McCreevy has previously served as EU Commissioner for Internal Markets and Services (2004-2010) and has held positions in several Irish Government Ministerial Offices, including Minister for Finance (1997-2004), Minister for Tourism & Trade (1993-1994) and Minister for Social Welfare (1992-1993) and is an Irish citizen.
Declan McKeon (Director). Declan McKeon has served as a director since May 2010. Mr. McKeon is a former audit partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers and continues to act as a consultant to PricewaterhouseCoopers. He is currently a director, chairman of the audit committee, and a member of the compensation committee of Icon plc and is an Irish citizen.
Kyran McLaughlin (Director). Kyran McLaughlin has served as a director since January 2001, and is also Deputy Chairman and Head of Capital Markets at Davy Stockbrokers. Mr. McLaughlin also advised Ryanair during its initial flotation on the Dublin and NASDAQ stock markets in 1997. Mr. McLaughlin also serves as a director of a number of other Irish private companies and is an Irish citizen.
R.A. (Dick) Milliken (Director). Dick Milliken has served as a director since July 2013. Mr. Milliken is a former CFO of the Almac Group and former CEO of Lamont plc. A qualified Chartered Accountant, Mr. Milliken serves as a director of Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank, NI Science Park Foundation and a number of private companies. Mr. Milliken is a graduate of Queens University Belfast, a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland and former Council member. He is a British citizen.
Michael OLeary (Executive Director). Michael OLeary has served as a director of Ryanair since 1988 and a director of Ryanair Holdings since July 1996. Mr. OLeary was appointed chief executive officer of Ryanair in 1994 and is an Irish citizen.
Julie ONeill (Director). Julie ONeill has served as a director since December 2012. Ms. ONeill served as Secretary General of the Department of Transport, Ireland from 2002 to 2009 and, in a career that spanned 37 years in the Irish public service, worked in strategic policy development and implementation in eight Government Departments. She is now an independent strategic management consultant and serves as a director of Permanent TSB plc and the Irish Museum of Modern Art. She is a board member of the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland and also chairs the audit committee of Trinity College Dublin and is an Irish citizen.
James Osborne (Director). James Osborne has served as a director of Ryanair Holdings since August 1996, and has been a director of Ryanair Ltd., since April 1995. Mr. Osborne is a former managing partner of A & L Goodbody Solicitors. He is also a former Chairman of Independent News and Media plc and a director of James Hardie Industries plc. He also serves as a director of a number of Irish private companies and is an Irish citizen.
Louise Phelan (Director). Louise Phelan has served as a director since December 2012. Ms. Phelan is VP for PayPal Global Operations Europe Middle East and Africa (EMEA), leading over 2,000 people in Dublin, Dundalk and Berlin. Ms. Phelan is the current President of the American Chamber of Commerce in Ireland and a prominent member of the Dublin Chamber of Commerce Ireland, CCMA Ireland, the Womens Executive Network (WXN), and is an Irish citizen.
The Board of Directors has established a number of committees, including the following:
Executive Committee. The Board of Directors established the Executive Committee in August 1996. The Executive Committee can exercise the powers exercisable by the full Board of Directors in circumstances in which action by the Board of Directors is required but it is impracticable to convene a meeting of the full Board of Directors. Messrs. Bonderman, McLaughlin, OLeary and Osborne are the members of the Executive Committee.
64
Remuneration Committee. The Board of Directors established the Remuneration Committee in September 1996. This committee has authority to determine the remuneration of senior executives of the Company and to administer the stock option plans described below. The Board of Directors as a whole determines the remuneration and bonuses of the chief executive officer, who is the only executive director. Mr. Osborne, Ms. ONeill and Ms. Phelan are the members of the Remuneration Committee.
Audit Committee. The Board of Directors established the Audit Committee in September 1996 to make recommendations concerning the engagement of independent chartered accountants; to review with the accountants the plans for and scope of each annual audit, the audit procedures to be utilized and the results of the audit; to approve the professional services provided by the accountants; to review the independence of the accountants; and to review the adequacy and effectiveness of the Companys internal accounting controls. Messrs. McKeon, McCreevy and Milliken are the members of the Audit Committee. In accordance with the recommendations of the Irish Combined Code of Corporate Governance (the Combined Code), a senior independent non-executive director, Mr. McKeon, is the chairman of the Audit Committee. All members of the Audit Committee are independent for purposes of the listing rules of the NASDAQ and the U.S. federal securities laws.
Nomination Committee. The Board of Directors established the Nomination Committee in May 1999 to make recommendations and proposals to the full Board of Directors concerning the selection of individuals to serve as executive and non-executive directors. The Board of Directors as a whole then makes appropriate determinations regarding such matters after considering such recommendations and proposals. Messrs. Bonderman, McLaughlin and OLeary are the members of the Nomination Committee.
Air Safety Committee. The Board of Directors established the Air Safety Committee in March 1997 to review and discuss air safety and related issues. The Air Safety Committee reports to the full Board of Directors each quarter. The Air Safety Committee is composed of Mr. Horgan and Howard Millar, Chief Financial Officer and Accountable Manager for Safety (who both act as co-chairman), as well as the following executive officers of Ryanair: Messrs. Hickey, OBrien and Wilson and the Chief Pilot, Ray Conway.
Powers of, and Action by, the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors is empowered by the Articles to carry on the business of Ryanair Holdings, subject to the Articles, provisions of general law and the right of stockholders to give directions to the directors by way of ordinary resolutions. Every director who is present at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Ryanair Holdings has one vote. In the case of a tie on a vote, the chairman of the Board of Directors has a second or tie-breaking vote. A director may designate an alternate director to attend any Board of Directors meeting, and such alternate director shall have all the rights of a director at such meeting.
The quorum for a meeting of the Board of Directors, unless another number is fixed by the directors, consists of three directors, a majority of whom must be EU nationals. The Articles require the vote of a majority of the directors (or alternates) present at a duly convened meeting for the approval of any action by the Board of Directors.
Composition and Term of Office
The Articles provide that the Board of Directors shall consist of no fewer than three and no more than 15 directors, unless otherwise determined by the stockholders. There is no maximum age for a director and no director is required to own any shares of Ryanair Holdings.
Directors are elected (or have their appointments confirmed) at the annual general meetings of stockholders. Save in certain circumstances, at every annual general meeting, one-third (rounded down to the next whole number if it is a fractional number) of the directors (being the directors who have been longest in office) must stand for re-election as their terms expire. Accordingly the terms of David Bonderman, James Osborne and Michael OLeary will have expired and they will be eligible to offer themselves for re-election at the next annual general meeting of Ryanair. In addition, Michael Cawley, who was Ryanairs Chief Operating Officer up to March 2014, will also offer himself for appointment to the Board of Directors at the next Annual General Meeting, which is scheduled to be held on September 25, 2014.
65
Exemptions from NASDAQ Corporate Governance Rules
The Company relies on certain exemptions from the NASDAQ corporate governance rules. These exemptions, and the practices the Company adheres to, are as follows:
| The Company is exempt from NASDAQs quorum requirements applicable to meetings of shareholders, which require a minimum quorum of 33% for any meeting of the holders of common stock, which in the Companys case are its Ordinary Shares. In keeping with Irish generally accepted business practice, the Articles provide for a quorum for general meetings of shareholders of three shareholders, regardless of the level of their aggregate share ownership. |
| The Company is exempt from NASDAQs requirement with respect to audit committee approval of related-party transactions, as well as its requirement that shareholders approve certain stock or asset purchases when a director, officer or substantial shareholder has an interest. The Company is subject to extensive provisions under the Listing Rules of the Irish Stock Exchange (the Irish Listing Rules) governing transactions with related parties, as defined therein, and the Irish Companies Act also restricts the extent to which Irish companies may enter into related-party transactions. In addition, the Articles contain provisions regarding disclosure of interests by the directors and restrictions on their votes in circumstances involving conflicts of interest. The concept of a related party for purposes of NASDAQs audit committee and shareholder approval rules differs in certain respects from the definition of a transaction with a related party under the Irish Listing Rules. |
| NASDAQ requires shareholder approval for certain transactions involving the sale or issuance by a listed company of common stock other than in a public offering. Under the NASDAQ rules, whether shareholder approval is required for such transactions depends, among other things, on the number of shares to be issued or sold in connection with a transaction, while the Irish Listing Rules require shareholder approval when the size of a transaction exceeds a certain percentage of the size of the listed company undertaking the transaction. |
| NASDAQ requires that each issuer solicit proxies and provide proxy statements for all meetings of shareholders and provide copies of such proxy solicitation to NASDAQ. The Company is exempt from this requirement as the solicitation of holders of ADSs is not required under the Irish Listing Rules or the Irish Companies Acts. Details of our annual general meetings and other shareholder meetings, together with the requirements for admission, voting or the appointment of a proxy are available on the website of the Company in accordance with the Irish Companies Acts and the Companys Articles of Association. ADS holders may provide instructions to The Bank of New York, as depositary, as to the voting of the underlying Ordinary Shares represented by such ADSs. Alternatively, ADS holders may convert their holding to Ordinary Shares, subject to compliance with the nationality ownership rules, in order to be eligible to attend our annual general meetings or other shareholder meetings. |
| NASDAQ requires that all members of a listed companys Nominating Committee be independent directors, unless the Company, as a foreign private issuer, provides an attestation of non-conforming practice based upon home country practice and then discloses such non-conforming practice annually in its Form 20-F. As permitted by the UK Corporate Governance Code, Michael OLeary, the Companys Chief Executive Officer, serves as a member of the Companys Nominating Committee. |
66
The Company also follows certain other practices under the UK Corporate Governance Code in lieu of those set forth in the NASDAQ corporate governance rules, as expressly permitted thereby. Most significantly:
Independence. NASDAQ requires that a majority of an issuers Board of Directors be independent under the standards set forth in the NASDAQ rules and that directors deemed independent be identified in the Companys annual report on Form 20-F. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the Companys nine non-executive directors is independent under the standards set forth in the UK Corporate Governance Code. Under the UK Corporate Governance Code, there is no bright-line test establishing set criteria for independence, as there is under NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(12). Instead, the Board of Directors determines whether the director is independent in character and judgment, and whether there are relationships or circumstances which are likely to affect, or could appear to affect, the directors judgment. Under the UK Corporate Governance Code, the Board of Directors may determine that a director is independent notwithstanding the existence of relationships or circumstances which may appear relevant to its determination, but it should state its reasons if it makes such a determination. The UK Corporate Governance Code specifies that relationships or circumstances that may be relevant include whether the director: (i) has been an employee of the relevant company or group within the last five years; (ii) has had within the last three years a direct or indirect material business relationship with such company; (iii) has received payments from such company, subject to certain exceptions; (iv) has close family ties with any of the companys advisers, directors or senior employees; (v) holds cross-directorships or other significant links with other directors; (vi) represents a significant shareholder; or (vii) has served on the Board of Directors for more than nine years. In determining that each of the nine non-executive directors is independent under the UK Corporate Governance Code standard, the Ryanair Holdings Board of Directors identified such relevant factors with respect to non-executive directors Messrs. Bonderman, McLaughlin, Osborne and Horgan. The Board has considered Kyran McLaughlins independence given his role as Deputy Chairman and Head of Capital Markets at Davy Stockbrokers. Davy Stockbrokers are one of Ryanairs corporate brokers and provide corporate advisory services to Ryanair from time to time. The Board has considered the fees paid to Davy Stockbrokers for these services and believe that they are immaterial to both Ryanair and Davy Stockbrokers given the size of each organisations business operations and financial results. Having considered this relationship, the Board has concluded that Kyran McLaughlin continues to be an independent non-executive director within the spirit and meaning of the 2012 Code Rules. The Board has also considered the independence of David Bonderman given his shareholding in Ryanair Holdings plc. As at March 31, 2014, David Bonderman had a beneficial shareholding in the Company of 7,655,671 ordinary shares, equivalent to 0.55% of the issued share capital. Having considered this shareholding in light of the number of issued shares in Ryanair Holdings plc and the financial interest of the director, the Board has concluded that the interest is not so material as to breach the spirit of the independence rule contained in the 2012 Code. The Board has further considered the independence of Messrs. David Bonderman, James Osborne, Kyran McLaughlin and Michael Horgan as they have each served more than nine years on the Board. The Board considers that each of these directors is independent in character and judgment as they either have other significant commercial and professional commitments and/or brings his own level of senior experience gained in their fields of international business and professional practice. When arriving at this decision, the Board has taken into account the comments made by the Financial Reporting Council in their report dated December, 2009 on their review of the impact and effectiveness of the Code, in particular their comment that independence is not the primary consideration when assessing the composition of the Board, and that the over-riding consideration should be that the Board is fit for purpose. For these reasons, and also because each directors independence is considered annually by the Board, the Board considers it appropriate that these directors have not been offered for annual re-election as is recommended by the 2012 Code. When arriving at the decision that these directors are nonetheless independent, the Board of Directors has taken into account the comments made by the Financial Reporting Council in its report dated December 2009 on its review of the impact and effectiveness of the UK Corporate Governance Code. The NASDAQ independence criteria specifically state that an individual may not be considered independent if, within the last three years, such individual or a member of his or her immediate family has had certain specified relationships with the company, its parent, any consolidated subsidiary, its internal or external auditors, or any company that has significant business relationships with the company, its parent or any consolidated subsidiary. Neither ownership of a significant amount of stock nor length of service on the board is a per se bar to independence under the NASDAQ rules.
67
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the executive officers of Ryanair Holdings and Ryanair at June 30, 2014:
Name |
Age | Position | ||
Michael Hickey |
51 | Group Director of Operations | ||
Kenny Jacobs |
40 | Chief Marketing Officer | ||
Juliusz Komorek |
36 | Director of Legal & Regulatory Affairs; Company Secretary | ||
Howard Millar |
53 | Deputy Chief Executive; Chief Financial Officer | ||
David OBrien |
50 | Chief Commercial Officer | ||
Michael OLeary |
53 | Director and Chief Executive Officer | ||
Edward Wilson |
50 | Director of Personnel and In-flight |
Michael Hickey (Group Director of Operations). Michael was appointed as Group Director of Operations in January 2014 having held the position of Director of Engineering since January 2000. Michael who has an MSC in Air Safety Management from City University in London is a licensed aircraft engineer and holds an EASA private pilots license. He has held a wide range of senior positions within the Engineering Department since he joined Ryanair in 1988 and was Deputy Director of Engineering between 1992 and January 2000. Prior to joining Ryanair, Michael worked as an aircraft engineer with Fields Aircraft Services and McAlpine Aviation, working primarily on executive aircraft.
Kenny Jacobs (Chief Marketing Officer). Kenny Jacobs was appointed Chief Marketing Officer in January 2014. He is responsible for sales, marketing and customer service at Ryanair. Previously Kenny was CMO for Moneysupermarket plc. which has a set of digital brands saving consumers money on insurance, finance, energy and travel. Kenny has spent most of his career in retail with Tesco PLC as marketing director in Tesco Ireland and brand director for Tesco UK. Prior to that he worked for German retailer Metro Group GmbH in various roles in marketing and IT in Europe and Asia.
Juliusz Komorek (Director of Legal & Regulatory Affairs; Company Secretary). Juliusz Komorek was appointed Company Secretary and Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs in May 2009, having served as Deputy Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs since 2007. Prior to joining the Company in 2004, Juliusz had gained relevant experience in the European Commissions Directorate General for Competition and in the Polish Embassy to the EU in Brussels, as well as in the private sector in Poland and the Netherlands. Juliusz is a lawyer, holding degrees from the universities of Warsaw and Amsterdam.
Howard Millar (Deputy Chief Executive; Chief Financial Officer). Howard Millar was appointed Deputy Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer on January 1, 2003, having served as Director of Finance of Ryanair from March 1993. Between April 1992 and March 1993 he served as Financial Controller of Ryanair. Howard was the Group Finance Manager for the Almarai Group, the largest integrated dairy food processing company in the world, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 1988 to 1992. On June 30, 2014, the Company announced that Howard has decided to step down from his full-time executive role on December 31, 2014 to pursue other career opportunities; Howard has been invited to join the board of directors of Ryanair after he steps down as a full-time executive. The current Finance Director Neil Sorahan has been appointed Chief Financial Officer with effect from October 1, 2014.
David OBrien (Chief Commercial Officer). David OBrien was appointed Chief Commercial Officer in January 2014 having previously served as Ryanairs Director of Flight and Ground Operations from December 2002. A graduate of the Irish Military College, David followed a military career with positions in the airport sector and agribusiness in the Middle East, Russia and Asia.
Michael OLeary (Chief Executive Officer). Michael OLeary has served as a director of Ryanair since 1988 and a director of Ryanair Holdings since July 1996. Mr. OLeary was appointed chief executive officer of Ryanair in 1994.
68
Edward Wilson (Director of Personnel and In-flight). Edward Wilson was appointed Director of Personnel and In-flight in December 2002, prior to which he served as Head of Personnel since joining Ryanair in December 1997. Prior to joining Ryanair he served as Human Resources Manager for Gateway 2000 and held a number of other human resources-related positions in the Irish financial services sector.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Compensation
The aggregate amount of compensation paid by Ryanair Holdings and its subsidiaries to the nine sitting non-executive directors and seven executive officers named above in the 2014 fiscal year was 6.8 million. For details of Mr. OLearys compensation in such fiscal year, see Employment and Bonus Agreement with Mr. OLeary below
Each of Ryanair Holdings nine non-executive directors is entitled to receive 35,000 plus expenses per annum, as remuneration for their services to Ryanair Holdings. The Chairman of the Board receives a fee of 100,000 per annum. Prior to the 2014 fiscal year, Mr. Bonderman had waived his entitlement to receive remuneration. The additional remuneration paid to Committee members for service on that committee is 15,000 per annum. Mr. Horgan receives 40,000 per annum in connection with his additional duties in relation to the Air Safety Committee.
For further details of stock options that have been granted to the Companys employees, including the executive officers, see Item 10. Additional InformationOptions to Purchase Securities from Registrant or Subsidiaries, as well as Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements included herein.
Employment and Bonus Agreement with Mr. OLeary
Mr. OLearys current employment agreement with the Company is dated July 1, 2002 and can be terminated by either party upon 12 months notice. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. OLeary serves as Chief Executive Officer at a current annual gross salary of 968,425, subject to any increases that may be agreed between the Company and Mr. OLeary. Mr. OLeary is also eligible for annual bonuses as determined by the Board of Directors of the Company; the amount of such bonuses paid to Mr. OLeary in the 2014 fiscal year totaled 783,000. Mr. OLeary is subject to a covenant not to compete with the Company within the EU for a period of two years after the termination of his employment with the Company. Mr. OLearys employment agreement does not contain provisions providing for compensation on its termination.
69
The following table sets forth the details of Ryanairs team at each of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
Number of Staff at March 31, | ||||||||||||
Classification |
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
Management |
105 | 99 | 99 | |||||||||
Administrative |
290 | 282 | 280 | |||||||||
Maintenance |
139 | 139 | 138 | |||||||||
Ground Operations |
220 | 229 | 243 | |||||||||
Pilots |
2,665 | 2,625 | 2,429 | |||||||||
Flight Attendants |
5,573 | * | 5,763 | 5,199 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
8,992 | 9,137 | 8,388 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Decrease on prior year due to lower aircraft in operation in March 2014 and cabin crew staff being furloughed. |
Ryanairs pilots, flight attendants and maintenance and ground operations personnel undergo training, both initial and recurrent. A substantial portion of the initial training for Ryanairs flight attendants is devoted to safety procedures, and cabin crew are required to undergo annual evacuation and fire drill training during their tenure with the airline. Ryanair also provides salary increases to its engineers who complete advanced training in certain fields of aircraft maintenance. Ryanair utilizes its own Boeing 737-800 aircraft simulators for pilot training.
IAA regulations require pilots to be licensed as commercial pilots with specific ratings for each aircraft to be flown. In addition, IAA regulations require all commercial pilots to be medically certified as physically fit. At March 31, 2014, the average age of Ryanairs pilots was 35 years and their average period of employment with Ryanair was 5.2 years. Licenses and medical certification are subject to periodic re-evaluation and require recurrent training and recent flying experience in order to be maintained. Maintenance engineers must be licensed and qualified for specific aircraft types. Flight attendants must undergo initial and periodic competency training. Training programs are subject to approval and monitoring by the IAA. In addition, the appointment of senior management personnel directly involved in the supervision of flight operations, training, maintenance and aircraft inspection must be satisfactory to the IAA. Based on its experience in managing the airlines growth to date, management believes that there is a sufficient pool of qualified and licensed pilots, engineers and mechanics within the EU to satisfy Ryanairs anticipated future needs in the areas of flight operations, maintenance and quality control and that Ryanair will not face significant difficulty in hiring and continuing to employ the required personnel. Ryanair has also been able to satisfy its needs for additional pilots through the use of contract agencies. These contract pilots are included in the table above. In addition, Ryanair has also been able to satisfy its needs for additional flight attendants through the use of contract agencies. These contract flight attendants are included in the table above.
Ryanair has a licensed approved organization in Holland to operate pilot training courses using Ryanairs syllabus, in order to grant Boeing 737 type-ratings. Each trainee pilot must pay for his or her own training and, based on his or her performance, he or she may be offered a position operating on Ryanair aircraft. This program enables Ryanair to secure a continuous stream of type-rated co-pilots.
Ryanairs crews earn productivity-based incentive payments, including a sales bonus for onboard sales for flight attendants and payments based on the number of hours or sectors flown by pilots and flight attendants (within limits set by industry standards or regulations fixing maximum working hours). During the 2014 fiscal year, such productivity-based incentive payments accounted for approximately 44% of an average flight attendants total earnings and approximately 32% of the typical pilots compensation. Pilots at 65 out of Ryanairs 69 bases are covered by four or five year agreements on pay, allowances and rosters which fall due for negotiation at various dates between 2014 and 2019. Cabin crew at all Ryanair bases are also party to long term collective agreements on pay, allowances and rosters which expire March 2017. In March 2013, Ryanair agreed to increase the pay of pilots and cabin crew in accordance with the terms of individual base agreements. Ryanairs pilots are currently subject to IAA-approved limits of 100 flight-hours per 28-day cycle and 900 flight-hours per fiscal year. For the 2014 fiscal year, the average flight-hours for Ryanairs pilots amounted to approximately 68 hours per month and approximately 812 hours for the complete year, an approximately 2% increase on the previous fiscal year. If more
70
stringent regulations on flight hours were to be adopted, Ryanairs flight personnel could experience a reduction in their total pay due to lower compensation for the number of hours or sectors flown and Ryanair could be required to hire additional flight personnel.
Ryanair considers its relations with its employees to be good. Ryanair currently negotiates with groups of employees, including its pilots, through Employee Representation Committees (ERCs) regarding pay, work practices and conditions of employment, including conducting formal negotiations with these internal collective bargaining units. Ryanairs senior management meets regularly with the different ERCs to discuss all aspects of the business and those issues that specifically relate to each relevant employee group.
Ryanair Holdings shareholders have approved a number of share option plans for employees and directors. Ryanair Holdings has also issued share options to certain of its senior managers. For details of all outstanding share options, see Item 10. Additional InformationOptions to Purchase Securities from Registrant or Subsidiaries.
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
As of June 30, 2014, there were 1,384,203,806 Ordinary Shares outstanding. As of that date, 112,316,349 ADRs, representing 561,581,745 Ordinary Shares, were held of record in the United States by 55 holders, and represented in the aggregate 40.57% of the number of Ordinary Shares then outstanding. See Item 10. Additional InformationArticles of Association and Limitations on Share Ownership by Non-EU Nationals.
Based on information available to Ryanair Holdings, the following table summarizes the holdings of those shareholders holding 3% or more of the Ordinary Shares as of June 30, 2014, June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the latest practicable date prior to the Companys publication of its statutory annual report in each of the relevant years.
As of June 30, 2014 | As of June 30, 2013 | As of June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
No. of Shares | % of Class |
No. of Shares | % of Class |
No. of Shares | % of Class |
|||||||||||||||||||
Capital Research and Management Company |
230,832,565 | 16.7 | % | 190,022,595 | 13.4 | % | 239,479,390 | 16.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Baillie Gifford |
79,001,583 | 5.7 | % | 71,863,457 | 5.0 | % | 52,883,746 | 3.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
BlackRock Inc. |
70,993,234 | 5.1 | % | 68,532,811 | 4.8 | % | 74,688,280 | 5.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Manning and Napier |
Not Reportable | n/a | 48,194,525 | 3.4 | % | 85,044,870 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Michael OLeary |
51,381,256 | 3.7 | % | 51,081,256 | 3.6 | % | 51,081,256 | 3.5 | % |
As of June 30, 2014, the directors and executive officers of Ryanair Holdings as a group owned 59,739,183 Ordinary Shares, representing 4.3% % of Ryanair Holdings outstanding Ordinary Shares as of such date. See also Note 19(d) to the consolidated financial statements included herein. Each of our shareholders has identical voting rights with respect to its Ordinary Shares.
As of March 31, 2014, there were 1,383,237,668 Ordinary Shares outstanding.
71
Based on information available to Ryanair Holdings plc, the following table summarizes shareholdings in excess of 3% or more of the Ordinary Shares as of March 31, 2014, March 31 2013 and March 31, 2012.
As of March 31, 2014 | As of March 31, 2013 | As of March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
No. of Shares | % of Class |
No. of Shares | % of Class |
No. of Shares | % of Class |
|||||||||||||||||||
Capital Research and Management Company |
230,917,315 | 16.7 | % | 191,997,595 | 13.3 | % | 275,514,695 | 18.9 | % | |||||||||||||||
Baillie Gifford |
77,578,902 | 5.6 | % | 70,323,718 | 4.9 | % | Not Reportable | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
BlackRock Inc. |
75,178,344 | 5.4 | % | 66,399,232 | 4.6 | % | 66,163,716 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Manning and Napier |
Not Reportable | n/a | % | 59,095,500 | 4.1 | % | 73,249,220 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Michael OLeary |
51,081,256 | 3.7 | % | 51,081,256 | 3.5 | % | 51,081,256 | 3.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Standard Life |
44,213,767 | 3.2 | % | Not Reportable | n/a | Not Reportable | n/a |
The Company has not entered into any related party transactions (except for remuneration paid by Ryanair to members of senior management and the board of directors as disclosed in note 27 to the consolidated financial statements) as defined in Item 7.B. of Form 20-F in the three fiscal years ending March 31, 2014 or in the period from March 31, 2014 to the date hereof.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Please refer to Item 18. Financial Statements.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is engaged in litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. Although no assurance can be given as to the outcome of any current or pending litigation, management does not believe that any of such litigation will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company, except as described below.
EU State Aid-Related Proceedings. On December 11, 2002, the European Commission announced the launch of an investigation into the 2001 agreement among Ryanair, the Brussels (Charleroi) airport and the government of the Walloon Region of Belgium, the owner of the airport, which enabled the Company to launch new routes and base up to four aircraft at Brussels (Charleroi). The European Commissions investigation was based on an anonymous complaint alleging that Ryanairs arrangements with Brussels (Charleroi) constituted illegal state aid.
The European Commission issued its decision on February 12, 2004. As regards to the majority of the arrangements between Ryanair, the airport and the region, the European Commission found that although they constituted state aid, they were nevertheless compatible with the EC Treaty provisions and therefore did not require repayment. However, the European Commission also found that certain other arrangements did constitute illegal state aid and therefore ordered Ryanair to repay the amount of the benefit received in connection with those arrangements. On April 20, 2004, the Walloon Region wrote to Ryanair requesting repayment of such state aid, although it acknowledged that Ryanair could offset against the amount of such state aid certain costs incurred in relation to the establishment of the base, in accordance with the European Commissions decision. Ryanair made the requested repayment.
On May 25, 2004, Ryanair appealed the decision of the European Commission to the Court of First Instance (CFI), requesting the court to annul the decision because:
| the European Commission infringed Article 253 of the EC Treaty by failing to provide adequate reasons for its decision; and |
| the European Commission misapplied Article 87 of the EC Treaty by failing to properly apply the Market Economy Investor Principle (MEIP), which generally holds that an investment made by a public entity that would have been made on the same basis by a private entity does not constitute state aid. |
72
In March 2008, Ryanair had its hearing before the CFI, and in December 2008, the CFI annulled the European Commissions decision. Ryanair was repaid the 4.0 million that the Commission had claimed was illegal state aid. The Belgian government has also withdrawn a separate 2.3 million action against Ryanair arising from the European Commissions decision.
In January 2010, the European Commission concluded that the financial arrangements between Bratislava airport in Slovakia and Ryanair do not constitute state aid within the meaning of EU rules, because these arrangements were in line with market terms. In July 2012, the European Commission similarly concluded that the financial arrangements between Tampere airport in Finland and Ryanair do not constitute state aid. In February 2014, the European Commission decided that the financial arrangements between Aarhus, Berlin (Schönefeld) and Marseille airports, and Ryanair, did not constitute state aid. On July 23, 2014 the European Commission announced a no state aid decision in respect of Dusseldorf (Weeze) airport, as well as findings of state aid to Ryanair in its arrangements with Pau, Nimes and Angouleme airports, ordering Ryanair to repay a total of approximately 9.7m of alleged aid. Ryanair will appeal these aid decisions to the EU General Court where proceedings are expected to take between 2 and 4 years.
Ryanair is facing similar legal challenges with respect to agreements with certain other airports, notably Lübeck, Alghero, Frankfurt (Hahn), Zweibrücken, Altenburg, Klagenfurt, (Stockholm) Vasteras, Paris (Beauvais), La Rochelle, Carcassonne, Cagliari, Brussels (Charleroi), Girona and Reus. These investigations are ongoing and Ryanair currently expects that they will conclude in mid to late 2014, with any European Commission decisions appealable to the EU General Court.
State aid complaints by Lufthansa about Ryanairs cost base at Frankfurt (Hahn) have been rejected by German courts, as have similar complaints by Air Berlin in relation to Ryanairs arrangement with Lubeck airport, but following a German Supreme Court ruling on a procedural issue in early 2011, these cases will be re-heard by lower courts. In addition, Ryanair has been involved in legal challenges including allegations of state aid at Alghero, Marseille and Berlin Schönefeld airports. The Alghero case (initiated by Air One) was dismissed in its entirety in April 2011. The Marseille case was withdrawn by the plaintiffs (subsidiaries of Air France) in May 2011. The Berlin Schönefeld, initiated by Germania, case was discontinued following the European Commissions finding in February 2014 that Ryanairs arrangement with the airport contained no state aid.
In September 2005, the European Commission announced new guidelines on the financing of airports and the provision of start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports, based on the European Commissions finding in the Brussels (Charleroi) case, which Ryanair successfully appealed. The guidelines applied only to publicly owned regional airports, and placed restrictions on the incentives these airports could offer airlines to deliver traffic. The guidelines applied only in cases in which the terms offered by a public airport are in excess of what a similar private airport would have offered. Ryanair deals with airports, both public and private, on an equal basis and receives the same cost agreements from both. The guidelines have therefore had no impact on Ryanairs business, although they have caused significant uncertainty in the industry in relation to what public airports may or may not do in order to attract traffic.
Ryanair believes that the positive decision by the CFI in the Brussels (Charleroi) case has caused the European Commission to rethink its policy in this area, and that the revised guidelines, published by the European Commission in April 2014, will provide more certainty in the industry as to how public airports may deal with airlines in offering incentives for traffic growth. However, adverse rulings in the above or similar cases could be used as precedents by other competitors to challenge Ryanairs agreements with other publicly owned airports and could cause Ryanair to strongly reconsider its growth strategy in relation to public or state-owned airports across Europe. This could in turn lead to a scaling back of Ryanairs growth strategy due to the smaller number of privately owned airports available for development. No assurance can be given as to the outcome of these proceedings, nor as to whether any unfavorable outcomes may, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
73
In November 2007, Ryanair initiated proceedings in the CFI against the European Commission for its failure to take action on a number of state aid complaints Ryanair had submitted against Air France, Lufthansa, Alitalia, Volare and Olympic Airways. Following the European Commissions subsequent findings that illegal state aid had been provided to Air France and Olympic Airways, Ryanair withdrew the two relevant proceedings. The case related to Lufthansa concluded with the EU General Courts ruling in May 2011, in which the Court found that while the European Commission has not failed to act, it has unreasonably delayed the launch of the investigation, which justified Ryanairs action for failure to act. Consequently, the Court ordered the European Commission to pay 50% of Ryanairs costs in the proceedings. Similarly, in October 2011, the General Court found that the European Commission has failed to act on Ryanairs 2005-2006 complaints against state aid to Alitalia. The European Commission appealed the ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union, and on May 16, 2013, the European Commissions appeal was rejected.
In November 2008, Ryanair initiated proceedings in the CFI contesting the European Commissions refusal to grant Ryanair access to documents relating to the European Commissions state aid investigations at Hamburg (Lubeck), Tampere, Berlin (Schonefeld), Alghero, Pau, Aarhus, Bratislava and Frankfurt (Hahn) airports. These cases were heard on July 7, 2010 and a judgment was issued in December 2010. The CFI found that the European Commission had acted in line with applicable legislation, which highlighted the unfairness inherent in state aid procedures in the EU, whereby alleged beneficiaries of aid have no right of access to the European Commissions files and therefore cannot properly exercise their rights to defense and good administration. The CFI ordered the European Commission to pay Ryanairs costs in three of the eight access to documents cases.
As a result of rising airport charges and the introduction of an Air Travel Tax, in March 2009, of 10 on passengers departing from Irish airports on routes longer than 300 kilometers from Dublin Airport (2 on shorter routes), Ryanair reduced its fleet at Dublin airport to 13 during winter 2010 (down from 22 in summer 2008 and 20 in winter 2008). Ryanair also complained to the European Commission about the unlawful differentiation in the level of the Irish Air Travel tax between routes within the EU. From April 2011, a single rate (3) of the Air Travel Tax was introduced on all routes (and subsequently eliminated entirely in April 2014). In July 2012 the European Commission found that Ryanair, Aer Lingus and Aer Arann had received state aid from the Irish government by way of a two-tier air travel tax levied on passengers departing from Irish airports. Ryanair appealed this decision and a hearing in the EU General Court took place in June 2014 and judgment is expected within six months of the hearing. Also in July 2012, Ryanair issued proceedings before the Irish courts seeking repayment of the entire amount of the air travel tax paid by Ryanair during the period (87.8 million) where it was two-tier on the basis of its illegality. In April 2013 the Irish government issued proceedings against Ryanair seeking recovery of 12 million of alleged state aid attributable to Ryanair, arising from the European Commission decision. There is a risk that Ryanair will be ordered by the Irish courts to pay the 12 million amount to the Irish government notwithstanding Ryanairs claim for repayment of the entire amount of the tax.
Matters Related to Investment in Aer Lingus. During the 2007 fiscal year, the Company acquired 25.2% of Aer Lingus. The Company increased its interest to 29.3% during the 2008 fiscal year, and to 29.8% during the 2009 fiscal year at a total aggregate cost of 407.2 million. Following the acquisition of its initial stake and upon the approval of the Companys shareholders, management proposed to effect a tender offer to acquire the entire share capital of Aer Lingus. This 2006 offer was, however, prohibited by the European Commission on competition grounds. Ryanair filed an appeal with the CFI, which was heard in July 2009. On July 6, 2010 the Court upheld the European Commissions decision. (see also: Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsBusiness Overview).
The then EU Commissioner for Competition, Neelie Kroes, said on June 27, 2007 that, Since Ryanair is not in a position to exert de jure or de facto control over Aer Lingus, the European Commission is not in a position to require Ryanair to divest its minority shareholding, which is, by the way, not a controlling stake. In October 2007, the European Commission also reached a formal decision that it would not force Ryanair to sell its shares in Aer Lingus. However, Aer Lingus appealed this decision before the CFI. In January 2008, the CFI heard an application by Aer Lingus for interim measures limiting Ryanairs voting rights, pending a decision of the CFI on Aer Lingus appeal of the European Commissions decision not to force Ryanair to sell the Aer Lingus shares. In March 2008, the court dismissed Aer Lingus application for interim measures. Aer Lingus main appeal was heard in July 2009. On July 6, 2010, the court rejected Aer Lingus appeal and confirmed that Ryanair cannot be forced to dispose of its 29.8% stake in Aer Lingus. Aer Lingus chose not to appeal this judgment to the Court of Justice of the
74
EU. EU legislation may change in the future to require such a forced disposal. If eventually forced to dispose of its stake in Aer Lingus, Ryanair could suffer significant losses due to the negative impact on market prices of the forced sale of such a significant portion of Aer Lingus shares.
On December 1, 2008, Ryanair made a second offer to acquire all of the ordinary shares of Aer Lingus it did not own at a price of 1.40 per ordinary share. Ryanair offered to keep Aer Lingus as a separate company, maintain the Aer Lingus brand, and retain its Heathrow slots and connectivity. Ryanair also proposed to double Aer Lingus short-haul fleet from 33 to 66 aircraft and to create 1,000 associated new jobs over a five-year period. If the offer had been accepted, the Irish government would have received over 180 million in cash. The employee share ownership trust and employees who owned 18% of Aer Lingus would have received over 137 million in cash. The Company met Aer Lingus management, representatives of the employee share ownership trust and other parties. The offer of 1.40 per Aer Lingus share represented a premium of approximately 25% over the closing price of 1.12 on November 28, 2008. Ryanair also advised the market that it would not proceed to seek EU approval for the new bid unless the shareholders agreed to sell their stakes in Aer Lingus to Ryanair. However, as the Company was unable to secure the shareholders support it decided, on January 28, 2009, to withdraw its second offer for Aer Lingus.
The United Kingdoms Office of Fair Trading (OFT) wrote to Ryanair in September 2010, advising that it intended to investigate Ryanairs minority stake in Aer Lingus. Ryanair objected on the basis that the OFTs investigation was time-barred. Ryanair contended that the OFT had and missed the opportunity to investigate Ryanairs minority stake within four months from the European Commissions June 2007 decision to prohibit Ryanairs takeover of Aer Lingus. The OFT agreed in October 2010 to suspend its investigation pending the outcome of Ryanairs appeal against the OFTs decision that its investigation is not time barred. On July 28, 2011, the Competition Appeal Tribunal ruled that the OFT was not time barred when it attempted in September 2010 to open an investigation into Ryanairs 2006 acquisition of a minority non-controlling stake in Aer Lingus. Ryanair subsequently appealed the Competition Appeal Tribunals decision. On November 24, 2011, the UK Court of Appeal ordered a stay of the OFTs investigation into Ryanairs minority stake in Aer Lingus pending the outcome of the appeal. On May 22, 2012, the UK Court of Appeal found that the OFT was not time barred to investigate Ryanairs minority stake in Aer Lingus in September 2010. Ryanair subsequently sought permission to appeal this ruling to the UK Supreme Court but permission was refused. On June 15, 2012, the OFT referred the investigation of Ryanairs minority stake in Aer Lingus to the UK Competition Commission
On June 19, 2012, Ryanair announced its third all cash offer to acquire all of the ordinary shares of Aer Lingus it did not own at a price of 1.30 per ordinary share and immediately commenced pre-notification discussions with the European Commission for the purpose of preparing a merger filing. Pending the outcome of the European Commissions review of Ryanairs bid, on the basis of the duty of sincere cooperation between the EU and the Member States, and under the EU Merger Regulation, the UK Competition Commissions investigation of Ryanairs minority stake in Aer Lingus should not have properly proceeded. Nevertheless, Aer Lingus argued that the investigation should proceed and that Ryanairs offer was in breach of certain provisions of the UK Enterprise Act 2002.
On July 10, 2012, the Competition Commission ruled that Ryanairs bid was not in breach of the UK Enterprise Act, but nevertheless decided that its investigation of the minority stake could proceed in parallel with the European Commissions investigation of Ryanairs offer for Aer Lingus. In July 2012, Ryanair appealed the latter part of the Competition Commissions ruling to the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal, and the Competition Commissions investigation became suspended pending the appeal process. On August 8, 2012, the Competition Appeal Tribunal rejected Ryanairs appeal and found that the Competition Commissions investigation could proceed in parallel with the European Commissions investigation, but that the Competition Commission must avoid taking any final decision which could conflict with the European Commissions ultimate conclusion on Ryanairs bid. In August 2012, Ryanair appealed the Competition Appeal Tribunal judgment to the UK Court of Appeal. In December 2012, the Court of Appeal rejected Ryanairs appeal and subsequently the Competition Commissions investigation has restarted. On December 13, 2012, Ryanair applied to the UK Supreme Court for permission to appeal the judgment of the Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court refused permission to appeal on April 25, 2013.
On February 27, 2013 the European Commission prohibited Ryanairs bid to acquire the entire share capital of Aer Lingus on the claimed basis that it would be incompatible with the EU internal market. Ryanair appealed this decision to the EU General Court on May 8, 2013. The judgment of the EU General Court is expected in 2015 and may affirm or annul the decision of the European Commission.
75
The timing of Ryanairs 2012 offer for Aer Lingus was influenced by; (i) the continued consolidation of European airlines, and more recently the International Airlines Group (the parent company of British Airways) takeover of British Midland International, where the No. 1 airline at Heathrow was allowed to acquire the No. 2; (ii) the additional capacity available at Dublin airport following the opening of Terminal 2 and the decline in traffic from 23.3 million passengers per annum in 2007 to 18.7 million in 2011, resulting in Dublin airport operating at approximately 50% capacity; (iii) the change in the Irish government policy since 2006 in that the Irish government indicated that it had decided to sell its stake in Aer Lingus; (iv) the fact that under the terms of the bailout agreement provided by the European Commission, European Central bank and International Monetary Fund to Ireland, the Irish government committed to sell its stake in Aer Lingus; (v) the fact that the ESOT (Employee Share Ownership Trust), which at the time of the unsuccessful 2006 offer controlled 15% of Aer Lingus, had been disbanded since December 2010 and the shares distributed to the individual members, with the result that Ryanairs new offer was, in Ryanairs view, capable of reaching over 50% acceptance either with or without government acceptance; and (vi) the fact that Etihad, an Abu Dhabi based airline, had acquired a 3% stake in Aer Lingus and had expressed an interest in buying the Irish governments 25% stake in Aer Lingus (the offer now provides Etihad or any other potential bidder the opportunity to purchase the governments stake).
Ryanair offered to keep Aer Lingus as a separate company, maintain the Aer Lingus brand, and to grow its traffic from 9.5 million to over 14.5 million passengers over a five year period post acquisition, by growing Aer Lingus short haul traffic at some of Europes major airports where Aer Lingus currently operates and Ryanair does not. Ryanair also intended to increase Aer Lingus transatlantic traffic from Ireland, which has fallen in recent years, by investing in operations. If the offer had been accepted, the Irish government would have received 173 million in cash. The offer of 1.30 per share represented a premium of approximately 38% over the closing price of 0.94 for Aer Lingus shares as of June 19, 2012. The offer was conditional on competition approval by the European Commission.
Following the European Commissions decision to prohibit its offer for Aer Lingus, Ryanair actively engaged with the Competition Commissions investigation of the minority stake. On August 28, 2013, the UK Competition Commission (UKCC) issued its final decision in which it stated that Ryanairs shareholding gave it the ability to exercise material influence over Aer Lingus and had led or may be expected to lead to a substantial lessening of competition in the markets for air passenger services between Great Britain and Ireland. As a result of its findings, the UKCC ordered Ryanair to reduce its shareholding in Aer Lingus to below 5 per cent of Aer Lingus issued ordinary shares. Ryanair appealed the UKCCs final decision to the CAT on September 23, 2013. The CAT rejected Ryanairs appeal on March 7, 2014. On April 23, 2014, the CAT granted Ryanair permission to appeal the CATs judgment to the Court of Appeal. Should this appeal, or any subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court, be unsuccessful, Ryanair could suffer losses due to the negative impact on market prices of the forced sale of such a significant portion of Aer Lingus shares. Ryanair believes that the enforcement of any such decision should be delayed until the outcome of Ryanairs appeal against the European Commissions February 2013 prohibition decision of Ryanairs 2012 offer for Aer Lingus, and the conclusion of any appeals against the UKCCs decision in the UK courts. However, it is possible that the UKCC will seek to enforce any such sell-down remedy at an earlier date.
Legal Actions Against Monopoly Airports. Ryanair has been involved in a number of legal and regulatory actions against the Dublin and London (Stansted) airports in relation to what Ryanair considers to be ongoing abuses of their dominant positions in the Dublin and London (Stansted) markets. Management believes that both of these airports have been engaging in regulatory gaming in order to achieve inflated airport charges under the regulatory processes in the U.K. and Ireland. By inflating its so-called regulated asset base (essentially the value of its airport facilities), a regulated airport can achieve higher returns on its assets through inflated airport charges. With respect to London (Stansted), the OFT, following complaints from Ryanair and other airlines, has recognized that the regulatory process is flawed and provides perverse incentives to regulated airports to spend excessively on infrastructure in order to inflate their airport charges. The OFT referred the case to the Competition Commission which released its preliminary findings in April 2008. It found that the common ownership by BAA of the three main airports in London affects competition and that the light touch regulation by the Civil Aviation Authority was having an adverse impact on competition. In March 2009, the Competition Commission published its final
76
report on the BAA and ordered the breakup of the BAA, (which involved the sale of London (Gatwick) and London (Stansted) and either Glasgow or Edinburgh Airport in Scotland). In October 2009, London (Gatwick) was sold to Global Infrastructure Partners for £1.5 billion. In May 2009, BAA appealed the Competition Commissions decision on the bases of apparent bias and lack of proportionality. Ryanair secured the right to intervene in this appeal in support of the Competition Commission. The case was heard in October 2009 and in February 2010 the Competition Appeal Tribunal quashed the Competition Commissions ruling on the basis of the apparent bias claim. This decision was successfully appealed by both the Competition Commission and Ryanair before the Court of Appeal. The appeal was heard in June 2010 and the judgment was issued in October 2010, quashing the Competition Appeal Tribunal ruling and reinstating the Competition Commission March 2009 decision. In February 2011, the Supreme Court refused to grant the BAA permission to appeal the Court of Appeal ruling. The Competition Commission has subsequently reconsidered the appropriateness of the remedies imposed on the BAA in March 2009 in light of the passage of time, and confirmed in its preliminary report in April 2011 that the remedies are still appropriate and the sale of Stansted and one of either Glasgow or Edinburgh airports should proceed. In July 2011, the Competition Commission confirmed its March 2011 provisional decision on possible material changes of circumstances. It found that no material changes of circumstances (that would necessitate a change in the remedies package) had occurred since the March 2009 decision requiring the BAA to sell London (Gatwick), London (Stansted) and one of either Glasgow or Edinburgh airports, and that consequently the BAA should proceed to dispose of London (Stansted) and one of the Scottish airports. The BAA appealed this decision to the Competition Appeal Tribunal, and lost on February 1, 2012. The BAA then brought a further appeal to the Court of Appeal, which they also lost on July 26, 2012. While these appeals were ongoing, the BAA proceeded to sell Edinburgh airport in April 2012. BAA did not appeal the Court of Appeal judgment to the UK Supreme Court, and proceeded to complete the sale of London (Stansted) airport to Manchester Airports Group plc in March 2013.
With respect to Dublin airport, Ryanair appealed the December 2009 decision of the CAR, which set maximum charges at the airport for 2010 through 2014, to the Appeals Panel set up by the Minister for Transport. In June 2010, the Appeals Panel found in favor of Ryanair on the matter of differential pricing between Terminal 1 and Terminal 2, recommending that such differential pricing be imposed by the CAR. The CAR subsequently overruled the decision of the Appeals Panel and allowed the charges increase at Dublin Airport, with no differential pricing between Terminals 1 and 2.
Ryanair has also been trying to prevent both the BAA in London and the DAA in Dublin from engaging in wasteful capital expenditure. In the case of London (Stansted) Airport, the BAA was planning to spend £4 billion on a second runway and terminal, which Ryanair believes should only cost approximately £1 billion. Following the final decision of the Competition Commission forcing BAA to sell London (Stansted) airport, Ryanair believed that it was highly unlikely that BAAs planned £4 billion plans would proceed. The Liberal/Conservative government in the U.K. had also outlined that it would not approve the building of any more runways in the Southeast of England. Consequently, in May 2010, the BAA announced that it would not pursue its plans to develop a second runway at London (Stansted).
In the case of Dublin, the DAA has built a second terminal, costing over four times its initial estimate. When the DAA first announced plans to build a second terminal (Terminal 2) at Dublin Airport, it estimated that the proposed expansion would cost between 170 million and 200 million. Ryanair supported a development of this scale; however, in September 2006, the DAA announced that the construction of Terminal 2 would cost approximately 800 million. Subsequently, the cost of the new infrastructure rose in excess of 1.2 billion. Ryanair opposed expansion at what it believed to be an excessive cost. On August 29, 2007, however the relevant planning authority approved the planning application from the DAA for the building of Terminal 2, and other facilities, all of which went ahead. On May 1, 2010, the airport fees per departing passenger increased by 27% from 13.61 to 17.23, and by a further 12% in 2011 following the opening of Terminal 2 in November 2010 in accordance with the CARs decision of December 4, 2009 in relation to airport charges between 2010 and 2014. Ryanair sought a judicial review of the planning approval, however, this appeal was unsuccessful. The increase in charges, in combination with the introduction of the 10 Air Travel Tax (subsequently reduced to 3 in March 2011 and eliminated entirely in April 2014) mentioned above, led to substantially reduced passenger volumes to and from Dublin Airport. See Item 3. Risk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyRyanairs Continued Growth is Dependent on Access to Suitable Airports; Charges for Airport Access are Subject to Increase and The Company Is Subject to Legal Proceedings Alleging State Aid at Certain Airports, as well as Item 4. Information on the CompanyAirport OperationsAirport Charges.
77
Legal Proceedings Against Internet Ticket Touts. The Company is involved in a number of legal proceedings against internet ticket touts (screenscraper websites) in Ireland, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Spain, Italy and Switzerland. Screenscraper websites gain unauthorized access to Ryanairs website and booking system, extract flight and pricing information and display it on their own websites for sale to customers at prices which include intermediary fees on top of Ryanairs fares. Ryanair does not allow any such commercial use of its website and objects to the practice of screenscraping also on the basis of certain legal principles, such as database rights, copyright protection, etc. The Companys objective is to prevent any unauthorized use of its website. The Company also believes that the selling of airline tickets by screenscraper websites is inherently anti-consumer as it inflates the cost of air travel. At the same time, Ryanair encourages genuine price comparison websites which allow consumers to compare prices of several airlines and then refer consumers to the airline website in order to perform the booking at the original fare. Ryanair offers licensed access to its flight and pricing information to such websites. Ryanair also permits Travelport, a GDS operator, to provide access to Ryanairs fares to traditional bricks and mortar travel agencies. The Company has received favorable rulings in Ireland, Germany and The Netherlands, and unfavorable rulings in Spain, France and Italy. However, pending the outcome of these legal proceedings and if Ryanair were to be ultimately unsuccessful in them, the activities of screenscraper websites could lead to a reduction in the number of customers who book directly on Ryanairs website and loss of ancillary revenues which are an important source of profitability through the sale of car hire, hotels and travel insurance etc. Also, some customers may be lost to the Company once they are presented by a screenscraper website with a Ryanair fare inflated by the screenscrapers intermediary fee. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyRyanair Faces Risks Related to Unauthorized Use of Information from the Companys Website.
Dividend Policy
Following shareholder approval at the September 2010 annual general meeting of shareholders, a 500 million special dividend was paid in October 2010. Similarly, following shareholder approval at the September 2012 annual general meeting of shareholders, a dividend of 0.34 per Ordinary Share (approximately 492 million) was paid in November 2012. The Company may pay other dividends from time to time. On June 20, 2013 the Company detailed plans to return up to 1 billion to shareholders over the next two years. The Company completed 481.7 million in share buybacks in fiscal year 2014 and indicated on May 19, 2014 that it plans to pay a special dividend of up to approximately 520 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, subject to shareholder approval at its annual general meeting on September 25, 2014. The Company has made no further commitments in relation to the payment of dividends, share buybacks or other shareholder distributions. Any cash dividends or other distributions, if made, are expected to be made in euro, although Ryanair Holdings Articles provide that dividends may be declared and paid in U.S. dollars. In the case of ADRs, the Depositary will convert all cash dividends and other distributions payable to owners of ADRs into U.S. dollars to the extent that, in its judgment, it can do so on a reasonable basis, and will distribute the resulting U.S. dollar amounts (net of conversion expenses and any applicable fees) to the owners of ADRs. See Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities for information regarding fees of the Depositary.
Share Buy-back Program
Following shareholder approval at the 2006 annual general meeting of shareholders, a 300 million share buy-back program was formally announced on June 5, 2007. Permission was received at the annual general meeting of the shareholders held on September 20, 2007 to repurchase a maximum of 75.6 million Ordinary Shares representing 5% of the Companys then outstanding share capital. The 300 million share buy-back of approximately 59.5 million Ordinary Shares, representing approximately 3.8% of the Companys pre-existing share capital, was completed in November 2007. In February 2008, the Company announced a second share buy-back program of up to 200 million worth of Ordinary Shares, which was ratified by shareholders at the annual general meeting of the shareholders held on September 18, 2008. 18.1 million Ordinary Shares were repurchased under this program at a cost of approximately 46.0 million. The Company also completed share buy-backs of 125 million in respect of 36.5 million Ordinary Shares in the 2012 fiscal year and 15 million Ordinary Shares at a cost of approximately 68 million in the 2013 fiscal year. In fiscal year 2014, 69.5 million Ordinary Shares (including just over 6.0 million ADRs) were repurchased at a cost of approximately 481.7 million. As a result, the total amount spent on the share buy-back programs to date was approximately 1,019.8 million with respect to the repurchase of 198.6 million Ordinary Shares. All Ordinary Shares (including ADRs which represent five Ordinary Shares) repurchased have been cancelled.
78
In April 2012, the Company held an extraordinary general meeting to authorize the Directors to repurchase Ordinary Shares and ADRs for up to 5% of the issued share capital of the Company traded on the NASDAQ. Up until April 2012, shareholders had only authorized the Directors to repurchase Ordinary Shares. As the ADRs typically trade at a premium of up to 20% compared to Ordinary Shares, this may result in increased costs in performing share buy-backs in the future. This authority was renewed at the Annual General Meeting held on September 20, 2013. The Company completed 481.7 million in share buybacks in fiscal year 2014 and indicated on May 19, 2014 that it plans to pay a special dividend of up to 520 million in Quarter 4, fiscal year 2015, subject to shareholder approval at its annual general meeting on September 25, 2014. The Company has made no further commitments in relation to the payment of dividends, share buybacks or other shareholder distributions.
See Item 9. The Offer and ListingTrading Markets and Share Prices below for further information regarding share buy-backs.
On April 30, 2014, the Company agreed to purchase an additional 5 Boeing 737-800NG aircraft for delivery in fiscal 2016, bringing the total number of aircraft to be purchased from Boeing to 180 for delivery between fiscal years 2015 and 2019.
In addition, in June 2014 Ryanair issued 850.0 million in unsecured eurobonds with a 7 year tenor at a coupon of 1.875%, which are guaranteed by Ryanair Holdings. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital Resources for additional information.
TRADING MARKETS AND SHARE PRICES
The primary market for Ryanair Holdings Ordinary Shares is the Irish Stock Exchange plc (the Irish Stock Exchange); Ordinary Shares are also traded on the London Stock Exchange. The Ordinary Shares were first listed for trading on the Official List of the Irish Stock Exchange on June 5, 1997 and were first admitted to the Official List of the London Stock Exchange on July 16, 1998.
79
ADRs, each representing five Ordinary Shares, are traded on NASDAQ. The Bank of New York Mellon is Ryanair Holdings depositary for purposes of issuing ADRs evidencing the ADSs. The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low closing sales prices of the ADRs on NASDAQ and for the Ordinary Shares on the Irish Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange, and have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one split of the Ordinary Shares and ADRs effected on February 26, 2007:
* | All quarterly high and low prices for ADRs and Ordinary Shares in the following tables refer to calendar year quarters and not fiscal year quarters |
ADRs | ||||||||
(in U.S. dollars) | ||||||||
High | Low | |||||||
2008 |
35.482 | 15.089 | ||||||
2009 |
29.586 | 20.779 | ||||||
2010 |
33.090 | 21.268 | ||||||
2011 |
31.990 | 24.200 | ||||||
2012 |
||||||||
First Quarter |
36.280 | 27.770 | ||||||
Second Quarter |
36.890 | 29.330 | ||||||
Third Quarter |
32.740 | 27.890 | ||||||
Fourth Quarter |
36.140 | 31.900 | ||||||
2013 |
||||||||
First Quarter |
43.23 | 34.62 | ||||||
Second Quarter |
51.53 | 41.36 | ||||||
Third Quarter |
54.05 | 44.51 | ||||||
Fourth Quarter |
51.33 | 43.51 | ||||||
2014 |
||||||||
January 31, 2014 |
50.930 | 46.990 | ||||||
February 28, 2014 |
56.950 | 48.120 | ||||||
March 31, 2014 |
58.810 | 55.100 | ||||||
April 30, 2014 |
60.110 | 52.940 | ||||||
May 31, 2014 |
57.100 | 50.980 | ||||||
June 30, 2014 |
58.230 | 53.390 | ||||||
Period ending July 18, 2014 |
56.11 | 51.85 |
80
Ordinary Shares (Irish Stock Exchange) |
||||||||
(in euro) | ||||||||
High | Low | |||||||
2008 |
4.20 | 1.80 | ||||||
2009 |
3.45 | 2.51 | ||||||
2010 |
4.19 | 2.77 | ||||||
2011 |
3.98 | 3.13 | ||||||
2012 |
||||||||
First Quarter |
4.48 | 3.68 | ||||||
Second Quarter |
4.49 | 3.83 | ||||||
Third Quarter |
4.48 | 3.86 | ||||||
Fourth Quarter |
5.00 | 4.43 | ||||||
2013 |
||||||||
First Quarter |
6.16 | 4.76 | ||||||
Second Quarter |
7.20 | 5.70 | ||||||
Third Quarter |
7.47 | 6.00 | ||||||
Fourth Quarter |
6.45 | 5.33 | ||||||
2014 |
||||||||
Month ending: |
||||||||
January 31, 2014 |
6.88 | 6.30 | ||||||
February 28, 2014 |
7.44 | 6.73 | ||||||
March 31, 2014 |
7.70 | 7.09 | ||||||
April 30, 2014 |
7.75 | 6.83 | ||||||
May 31, 2014 |
7.32 | 6.35 | ||||||
June 30, 2014 |
7.61 | 6.81 | ||||||
Period ending July 18, 2014 |
7.19 | 6.64 | ||||||
Ordinary Shares (London Stock Exchange) |
||||||||
(in euro) | ||||||||
High | Low | |||||||
2008 |
4.20 | 1.81 | ||||||
2009 |
3.45 | 2.50 | ||||||
2010 |
4.19 | 2.76 | ||||||
2011 |
3.97 | 3.13 | ||||||
2012 |
||||||||
First Quarter |
4.48 | 3.68 | ||||||
Second Quarter |
4.49 | 3.84 | ||||||
Third Quarter |
4.47 | 3.88 | ||||||
Fourth Quarter |
5.00 | 4.40 | ||||||
2013 |
||||||||
First Quarter |
6.20 | 4.76 | ||||||
Second Quarter |
7.18 | 5.80 | ||||||
Third Quarter |
7.48 | 5.84 | ||||||
Fourth Quarter |
6.45 | 5.45 | ||||||
Month ending: |
||||||||
January 31, 2014 |
6.86 | 6.31 | ||||||
February 28, 2014 |
7.43 | 6.74 | ||||||
March 31, 2014 |
7.72 | 7.08 | ||||||
April 30, 2014 |
7.75 | 6.83 | ||||||
May 31, 2014 |
7.31 | 6.35 | ||||||
June 30, 2014 |
7.61 | 6.79 | ||||||
Period ending July 18, 2014 |
7.20 | 6.65 |
81
Since certain of the Ordinary Shares are held by brokers or other nominees, the number of direct record holders in the United States, which is reported as 55, may not be fully indicative of the number of direct beneficial owners in the United States, or of where the direct beneficial owners of such shares are resident.
In order to increase the percentage of its share capital held by EU nationals, beginning June 26, 2001, Ryanair Holdings instructed the Depositary to suspend the issuance of new ADRs in exchange for the deposit of Ordinary Shares until further notice. Therefore, holders of Ordinary Shares cannot currently convert their Ordinary Shares into ADRs. The Depositary will however convert existing ADRs into Ordinary Shares at the request of the holders of such ADRs. The Company in 2002 implemented additional measures to restrict the ability of non-EU nationals to purchase Ordinary Shares. As a result, non-EU nationals are currently effectively barred from purchasing Ordinary Shares. See Item 10. Additional InformationLimitations on Share Ownership by Non-EU Nationals for additional information.
The Company, at its annual general meeting of the Shareholders, has, in recent years, passed a special resolution permitting the Company to engage in Ordinary Share buy-back programs subject to certain limits noted below. Since June 2007 (when the Company engaged in its first Ordinary Share buy-back program) the Company has repurchased the following Ordinary Shares:
Year ended March 31, |
No. of shares (m) | Approx. cost (m) | ||||||
2008 |
59.5 | 300.0 | ||||||
2009 |
18.1 | 46.0 | ||||||
2010 |
| | ||||||
2011 |
| | ||||||
2012 |
36.5 | 124.6 | ||||||
2013 |
15.0 | 67.5 | ||||||
2014 |
69.5 | 481.7 | ||||||
Period through July 18, 2014 |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
198.6 | 1,019.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
All Ordinary Shares repurchased have been cancelled.
The maximum price at which the Company may repurchase Ordinary Shares, in accordance with the listing rules of the Irish Stock Exchange and of the Financial Services Authority, is the higher of 5% above the average market value of the Companys Ordinary Shares for the five business days prior to the day of the repurchase and the price stipulated by Article 5(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) of December 22, 2003 (No. 2273/2003) (which is the higher of the last independent trade and the highest current independent bid on the Irish Stock Exchange). The minimum price at which the Company may repurchase Ordinary Shares is their nominal value, currently 0.635 euro cent per share.
At an extraordinary general meeting of Shareholders held on April 19, 2012, the Company obtained a new repurchase authority which enables the Company to repurchase the Companys ADRs which are traded on NASDAQ. The maximum price at which Ordinary Shares which underlie the Companys ADRs can be repurchased is 5% above one-fifth of the average market value of the Companys ADRs as quoted on NASDAQ, for the five business days prior to the date of purchase (as one ADS represents five Ordinary Shares). Any ADRs purchased will be converted to Ordinary Shares by the Companys brokers for subsequent repurchase and cancellation by the Company. During fiscal 2014, the Company repurchased 6,018,800 ADRs equivalent to 30,094,000 ordinary shares at a price per ADR of $49.01 equivalent to approximately 7.41 per ordinary share.
As of June 30, 2014, the total number of options over Ordinary Shares outstanding under all of the Companys share option plans was 4,814,391, representing 0.3% of the Companys issued share capital at that date.
82
Item 10. Additional Information
Ryanair Holdings capital stock consists of Ordinary Shares, each having a par value of 0.635 euro cent. As of March 31, 2014, a total of 1,383,237,668 Ordinary Shares were outstanding. On February 26, 2007, Ryanair effected a 2-for-1 share split as a result of which each of its then existing Ordinary Shares, par value 1.27 euro cent, was split into two new Ordinary Shares, par value 0.635 euro cent. Each Ordinary Share entitles the holder thereof to one vote in respect of any matter voted upon by Ryanair Holdings shareholders.
OPTIONS TO PURCHASE SECURITIES FROM REGISTRANT OR SUBSIDIARIES
Ryanair Holdings shareholders approved a stock option plan (referred to herein as Option Plan 2000), under which all employees and directors are eligible to receive options. Grants of options were permitted to take place at the close of any of the ten years beginning with fiscal year 2000 only if the Companys net profit after tax for such fiscal year had exceeded its net profit after tax for the prior fiscal year by at least 25%, or if an increase of 1% in net profit after tax for the relevant year would have resulted in such requirement being met.
Ryanair Holdings shareholders approved a stock option plan (referred to herein as Option Plan 2003) established in accordance with a then tax-favorable share option scheme available under Irish law, so that employees would not be subject to income tax on the exercise of options (subject to certain conditions). Option Plan 2003 was approved by the Revenue Commissioners on July 4, 2003 for the purposes of Chapter 4, Part 17, of the Irish Taxes Consolidation Act, 1997 and Schedule 12C of that Act. Following the publication of the Irish National Recovery Plan: 2011-2014 (the NRP) on November 24, 2010, Revenue approved share option plans, such as Option Plan 2003, no longer qualified for favorable tax treatment from that date. All employees and full-time directors were eligible to participate in the plan, under which grants of options could be made at the close of any of the ten years beginning with fiscal year 2002 only if the Companys net profit after tax for such fiscal year had exceeded its net profit after tax for the prior fiscal year by at least 25%, or if an increase of 1% in net profit after tax for the relevant year would have resulted in such requirement being met.
Under Option Plan 2000, 20 senior managers (including seven of the current executive officers) were granted 10,500,000 share options, in the aggregate, at a strike price of 3.21 in July 2005. Not all of the vesting conditions were met, and as a result only 80% of the options granted that satisfied the conditions were exercisable between August 1, 2011 and August 31, 2013. The Company recognized a credit of 2.5 million in relation to the options that did not vest in June 2011. Also, under Option Plan 2000, each of the non-executive directors were granted 25,000 share options, at a strike price of 4.96, during the 2008 fiscal year. These options are exercisable between June 2012 and June 2014. In addition, 39 senior managers (including five of the current executive officers) were granted 10,000,000 share options, in the aggregate, under Option Plan 2000, at a strike price of 2.56, on September 18, 2008. These options are exercisable between September 18, 2013 and September 17, 2015, but only for managers who continued to be employed by the Company through September 18, 2013.
During fiscal year 2014, Ryanair Holdings shareholders approved a stock option plan at the Companys annual general meeting on September 20, 2013 (referred to herein as Option Plan 2013), under which all employees and directors are eligible to receive options. Grants of options were permitted to take place at the close of any of the ten years beginning with fiscal year 2014. All options will be subject to a five year performance period beginning with the year in which a grant occurs. The Remuneration Committee has discretion to determine the financial performance targets that must be met with respect to the financial year. Those targets will relate directly to the achievement of certain year-on-year growth targets in the Companys profit after tax figures for each of the financial years of the performance period and/or certain share price targets. The Option Plan 2013 will replace two stock options plans previously approved by shareholders (Option Plan 2000 and Option Plan 2003) for all future grants, as both of these plans have expired, although any subsisting options granted under Option Plan 2000 or Option Plan 2003 that have not yet lapsed will continue to be governed by all terms of those plans, as applicable.
83
The aggregate of 4,814,391 Ordinary Shares that would be issuable upon exercise in full of the options that were outstanding as of June 30, 2014 under Companys option plan represent approximately 0.3% of the issued share capital of Ryanair Holdings as of such date. Of such total, options in respect of an aggregate of 1,397,500 Ordinary Shares were held by the directors and executive officers of Ryanair Holdings. For further information, see notes 15 and 19 to the consolidated financial statements included herein.
The following is a summary of certain provisions of the Articles of Association of Ryanair Holdings. This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Articles, which are included as an exhibit to this annual report.
Objects. Ryanair Holdings objects, which are detailed in its Articles, are broad and include carrying on business as an investment and holding company. Ryanair Holdings Irish company registration number is 249885.
Directors. Subject to certain exceptions, directors may not vote on matters in which they have a material interest. The ordinary remuneration of the directors is determined from time to time by ordinary resolutions of the shareholders. Any director who holds any executive office, serves on any committee or otherwise performs services, which, in the opinion of the directors, are outside the scope of the ordinary duties of a director, may be paid such extra remuneration as the directors may determine. The directors may exercise all the powers of the Company to borrow money. These powers may be amended by special resolution of the shareholders. The directors are not required to retire at any particular age. There is no requirement for directors to hold shares. The Articles of Association provide that one-third of the directors retire and offer themselves for re-election at each annual general meeting of the Company. The directors to retire by rotation are those who have been longest in office since their last appointment or reappointment. As between persons who became or were appointed directors on the same date, those to retire are determined by agreement between them or, otherwise, by lot. All of the shareholders entitled to attend and vote at the annual general meeting of the Company may vote on the re-election of directors.
Annual and General Meetings. Annual and extraordinary meetings are called upon 21 days advance notice. At Ryanairs annual general meeting, held on September 22, 2010, the Companys Articles of Association were amended by special resolution to reflect the implementation of the Shareholders Rights (Directive 2007/36/EC) Regulations 2009 to allow all Ryanair shareholders to appoint proxies electronically to attend, speak, ask questions and vote on behalf of them at annual general meetings and to reflect certain other provisions of those Regulations. All holders of Ordinary Shares are entitled to attend, speak at and vote at general meetings of the Company, subject to limitations described below under Limitations on the Right to Own Shares.
Rights, Preferences and Dividends Attaching to Shares. The Company has only one class of shares, Ordinary Shares with a par value of 0.635 euro cent per share. All such shares rank equally with respect to payment of dividends and on any winding-up of the Company. Any dividend, interest or other sum payable to a shareholder that remains unclaimed for one year after having been declared may be invested by the directors for the benefit of the Company until claimed. If the directors so resolve, any dividend which has remained unclaimed for 12 years from the date of its declaration shall be forfeited and cease to remain owing by the Company. The Company is permitted under its Articles to issue redeemable shares on such terms and in such manner as the Company may, by special resolution, determine. The Ordinary Shares currently in issue are not redeemable. The liability of shareholders to invest additional capital is limited to the amounts remaining unpaid on the shares held by them. There are no sinking fund provisions in the Articles of the Company.
Action Necessary to Change the Rights of Shareholders. The rights attaching to shares in the Company may be varied by special resolutions passed at meetings of the shareholders of the Company.
Limitations on the Rights to Own Shares. The Articles contain detailed provisions enabling the directors of the Company to limit the number of shares in which non-EU nationals have an interest or the exercise by non-EU nationals of rights attaching to shares. See Limitations on Share Ownership by Non-EU Nationals below. Such
84
powers may be exercised by the directors if they are of the view that any license, consent, permit or privilege of the Company or any of its subsidiaries that enables it to operate an air service may be refused, withheld, suspended or revoked or have conditions attached to it that inhibit its exercise and the exercise of the powers referred to above could prevent such an occurrence. The exercise of such powers could result in non-EU holders of shares being prevented from attending, speaking at or voting at general meetings of the Company and/or being required to dispose of shares held by them to EU nationals.
Disclosure of Share Ownership. Under Irish law, the Company can require parties to disclose their interests in shares. The Articles of the Company entitle the directors to require parties to complete declarations indicating their nationality and the nature and extent of any interest which such parties hold in Ordinary Shares before allowing such parties to transfer such Ordinary Shares. See, also Limitations on Share Ownership by non-EU nationals below. Under Irish law, if a party acquires or disposes of Ordinary Shares so as to bring his interest above or below 5% of the total issued share capital of the Company, he must notify the Company of that. The Irish Stock Exchange must also be notified of any acquisition or disposal of shares that brings the shareholding of a party above or below certain specified percentagesi.e., 10%, 25%, 50% and 75%.
Other Provisions of the Articles of Association. There are no provisions in the Articles:
(i) | delaying or prohibiting a change in the control of the Company, but which operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring; |
(ii) | discriminating against any existing or prospective holder of shares as a result of such shareholder owning a substantial number of shares; or |
(iii) | governing changes in capital, |
in each case, where such provisions are more stringent than those required by law.
On March 19, 2013, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement with Boeing to purchase 175 Boeing 737-800NG aircraft, with a list value of over $13.8 billion, over a five year period from fiscal 2015 to 2019 in accordance with the terms of the contract. The contract was approved by the shareholders of the Company at an extraordinary general meeting on June 18, 2013. On April 30, 2014, the Company agreed to purchase an additional 5 Boeing 737-800NG aircraft for delivery in fiscal 2016, bringing the total number of aircraft to be purchased from Boeing to 180 for delivery between fiscal years 2015 and 2019, with a list value of approximately $14.1 billion.
Except as indicated below, there are no restrictions on non-residents of Ireland dealing in Irish securities (including shares or depositary receipts of Irish companies such as the Company). Dividends and redemption proceeds also continue to be freely transferable to non-resident holders of such securities.
Under the Financial Transfers Act 1992 (the 1992 Act), the Minister for Finance of Ireland may make provision for the restriction of financial transfers between Ireland and other countries. Financial transfers are broadly defined, and the acquisition or disposal of the ADRs, which represent shares issued by an Irish incorporated company, the acquisition or the disposal of Ordinary Shares and associated payments may fall within this definition. Dividends or payments on the redemption or purchase of shares and payments on the liquidation of an Irish-incorporated company would fall within this definition.
The 1992 Act prohibits financial transfers involving the late Slobodan Milosevic and certain associated persons, President Lukashenko, the Belarusian leadership and certain other officials of Belarus, Burma (Myanmar), certain persons indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, certain persons and entities associated with the now deceased Usama Bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban of Afghanistan,
85
the Democratic Republic of Congo, certain persons in Egypt, certain activities, persons and entities in Eritrea, the Republic of Guinea, the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (North Korea), Iraq, Côte dIvoire, certain activities in Lebanon, certain activities in Liberia and the former Liberian President Charles Taylor, his immediate family and close associates, Libya, certain persons in Tunisia, certain activities and persons in Zimbabwe, certain persons and activities in Sudan and South Sudan, Somalia, certain activities, persons and entities in Syria and Iran, certain persons, entities and bodies in the Republic of Guinea-Bissau, certain known terrorists and terrorist groups, and countries that harbor certain terrorist groups, without the prior permission of the Central Bank of Ireland.
Any transfer of, or payment in respect of, an ADS involving the government of any country that is currently the subject of United Nations sanctions, any person or body controlled by any of the foregoing, or any person acting on behalf of the foregoing, may be subject to restrictions pursuant to such sanctions as implemented into Irish law. The Company does not anticipate that Irish exchange controls or orders under the 1992 Act or United Nations sanctions implemented into Irish law will have a material effect on its business.
LIMITATIONS ON SHARE OWNERSHIP BY NON-EU NATIONALS
The Board of Directors of Ryanair Holdings is given certain powers under the Articles to take action to ensure that the number of Ordinary Shares held in Ryanair Holdings by non-EU nationals does not reach a level which could jeopardize the Companys entitlement to continue to hold or enjoy the benefit of any license, permit, consent or privilege which it holds or enjoys and which enables it to carry on business as an air carrier (a License). In particular, EU Regulation 2407/92 requires that, in order to obtain and retain an operating license, an EU air carrier must be majority-owned and effectively controlled by EU nationals. The regulation does not specify what level of share ownership will confer effective control on a holder or holders of shares. As described below, the directors will, from time to time, set a Permitted Maximum on the number of Ordinary Shares that may be owned by non-EU nationals at such level as they believe will comply with EU law. The Permitted Maximum is currently set at 49.9%.
Ryanair Holdings maintains a separate register (the Separate Register) of Ordinary Shares in which non-EU nationals, whether individuals, bodies corporate or other entities, have an interest (such shares are referred to as Affected Shares in the Articles). Interest in this context is widely defined and includes any interest held through ADRs in the shares underlying the relevant ADRs. The directors can require relevant parties to provide them with information to enable a determination to be made by the directors as to whether Ordinary Shares are, or are to be treated as, Affected Shares. If such information is not available or forthcoming or is unsatisfactory then the directors can, at their discretion, determine that Ordinary Shares are to be treated as Affected Shares. Registered holders of Ordinary Shares are also obliged to notify the Company if they are aware that any Ordinary Share which they hold ought to be treated as an Affected Share for this purpose. With regard to ADRs, the directors can treat all of the relevant underlying shares as Affected Shares unless satisfactory evidence as to why they should not be so treated is forthcoming.
In the event that, inter alia, (i) the refusal, withholding, suspension or revocation of any License or the imposition of any condition which materially inhibits the exercise of any License (an Intervening Act) has taken place, (ii) the Company receives a notice or direction from any governmental body or any other body which regulates the provision of air transport services to the effect that an Intervening Act is imminent, threatened or intended or (iii) an Intervening Act may occur as a consequence of the level of non-EU ownership of Ordinary Shares or an Intervening Act is imminent, threatened or intended because of the manner of share ownership or control of Ryanair Holdings generally, the directors can take action pursuant to the Articles to deal with the situation. They can, inter alia, (i) remove any directors or change the chairman of the Board of Directors, (ii) identify those Ordinary Shares, ADRs or Affected Shares which give rise to the need to take action and treat such Ordinary Shares, ADRs, or Affected Shares as Restricted Shares (see below) or (iii) set a Permitted Maximum on the number of Affected Shares which may subsist at any time (which may not, save in the circumstances referred to below, be lower than 40% of the total number of issued shares) and treat any Affected Shares (or ADRs representing such Affected Shares) in excess of this Permitted Maximum as Restricted Shares (see below).
In addition to the above, if as a consequence of a change of law or a direction, notice or requirement of any state, authority or person it is necessary to reduce the total number of Affected Shares below 40% or reduce the number of Affected Shares held by any particular stockholder or stockholders in order to overcome, prevent or avoid
86
an Intervening Act, the directors may resolve to (i) set the Permitted Maximum at such level below 40% as they consider necessary in order to overcome, prevent or avoid such Intervening Act, or (ii) treat such number of Affected Shares (or ADRs representing Affected Shares) held by any particular stockholder or stockholders as they consider necessary (which could include all of such Affected Shares or ADRs) as Restricted Shares (see below). The directors may serve a Restricted Share Notice in respect of any Affected Share, or any ADR representing any ADS, which is to be treated as a Restricted Share. Such notices can have the effect of depriving the recipients of the rights to attend, vote at and speak at general meetings, which they would otherwise have as a consequence of holding such Ordinary Shares or ADRs. Such notices can also require the recipients to dispose of the Ordinary Shares or ADRs concerned to an EU national (so that the relevant shares (or shares underlying the relevant ADRs) will then cease to be Affected Shares) within 21 days or such longer period as the directors may determine. The directors are also given the power to transfer such Restricted Shares, themselves, in cases of non-compliance with the Restricted Share Notice.
To enable the directors to identify Affected Shares, transferees of Ordinary Shares are generally required to provide a declaration as to the nationality of persons having interests in those shares. Stockholders are also obliged to notify Ryanair Holdings if they are aware that any shares, which they hold, ought to be treated as Affected Shares for this purpose. Purchasers or transferees of ADRs need not complete a nationality declaration because the directors expect to treat all of the Ordinary Shares held by the Depositary as Affected Shares. ADS holders must open ADR accounts directly with the Depositary if they wish to provide to Ryanair Holdings nationality declarations or such other evidence as the directors may require in order to establish to the directors satisfaction that the Ordinary Shares underlying such holders ADRs are not Affected Shares.
In deciding which Affected Shares are to be selected as Restricted Shares, the directors can take into account which Affected Shares have given rise to the necessity to take action. Subject to that they will, insofar as practicable, firstly view as Restricted Shares those Affected Shares in respect of which no declaration as to whether or not such shares are Affected Shares has been made by the holder thereof and where information which has been requested by the directors in accordance with the Articles has not been provided within specified time periods and, secondly, have regard to the chronological order in which details of Affected Shares have been entered in the Separate Register and, accordingly, treat the most recently registered Affected Shares as Restricted Shares to the extent necessary. Transfers of Affected Shares to Affiliates (as that expression is defined in the Articles) will not affect the chronological order of entry in the Separate Register for this purpose. The directors do however have the discretion to apply another basis of selection if, in their sole opinion, that would be more equitable. Where the directors have resolved to treat Affected Shares held by any particular stockholder or stockholders as Restricted Shares (i) because such Affected Shares have given rise to the need to take such action or (ii) because of a change of law or a requirement or direction of a regulatory authority necessitating such action (see above), such powers may be exercised irrespective of the date upon which such Affected Shares were entered in the Separate Register.
After having initially resolved to set the maximum level at 49.0%, the directors increased the maximum level to 49.9% on May 26, 1999, after the number of Affected Shares exceeded the initial limit. This maximum level could be reduced if it becomes necessary for the directors to exercise these powers in the circumstances described above. The decision to make any such reduction or to change the Permitted Maximum from time to time will be published in at least one national newspaper in Ireland and in any country in which the Ordinary Shares or ADRs are listed. The relevant notice will specify the provisions of the Articles that apply to Restricted Shares and the name of the person or persons who will answer queries relating to Restricted Shares on behalf of Ryanair Holdings. The directors shall publish information as to the number of shares held by EU nationals annually.
In an effort to increase the percentage of its share capital held by EU nationals, on June 26, 2001, Ryanair Holdings instructed the Depositary to suspend the issuance of new ADSs in exchange for the deposit of Ordinary Shares until further notice to its shareholders. Holders of Ordinary Shares cannot convert their Ordinary Shares into ADRs during such suspension, and there can be no assurance that the suspension will ever be lifted.
As a further measure to increase the percentage of Ordinary Shares held by EU nationals, on February 7, 2002, the Company issued a notice to shareholders to the effect that any purchase of Ordinary Shares by a non-EU national after such date will immediately result in the issue of a Restricted Share Notice to such non-EU national Purchaser. The Restricted Share Notice compels the non-EU national purchaser to sell the Affected Shares to an EU national within 21 days of the date of issuance. In the event that any such non-EU national shareholder does not sell
87
its Ordinary Shares to an EU national within the specified time period, the Company can then take legal action to compel such a sale. As a result, non-EU nationals are effectively barred from purchasing Ordinary Shares for as long as these restrictions remain in place. There can be no assurance that these restrictions will ever be lifted.
As an additional measure, to ensure the percentage of shares held by EU nationals remains at least 50.1%, at the extraordinary general meeting held on April 19, 2012, the Company obtained a new repurchase authority which will enable the repurchase of ADRs for up to 5% of the issued share capital of the Company traded on the NASDAQ. This authority was renewed at the Annual General Meeting held on September 20, 2013.
Concerns about the foreign ownership restrictions described above could result in the exclusion of Ryanair from certain stock tracking indices. Any such exclusion may adversely affect the market price of the Ordinary Shares and ADRs. See also Item 3. Risk FactorsRisks Related to Ownership of the Companys Shares or ADRsEU Rules Impose Restrictions on the Ownership of Ryanair Holdings Ordinary Shares by Non-EU Nationals and the Company has Instituted a Ban on the Purchase of Ordinary Shares by Non-EU Nationals above.
As of June 30, 2014, EU nationals owned at least 52.8% of Ryanair Holdings Ordinary Shares (assuming conversion of all outstanding ADRs into Ordinary Shares). Ryanair continuously monitors the ownership status of its Ordinary Shares, which changes on a daily basis.
Irish Tax Considerations
The following is a discussion of certain Irish tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of Ordinary Shares or ADSs. This discussion is based upon tax laws and practice of Ireland at the date of this document, which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Particular rules may apply to certain classes of taxpayers (such as dealers in securities) and this discussion does not purport to deal with the tax consequences of purchase, ownership or disposition of the relevant securities for all categories of investors.
The discussion is intended only as a general guide based on current Irish law and practice and is not intended to be, nor should it be considered to be, legal or tax advice to any particular investor or stockholder. Accordingly, current stockholders or potential investors should satisfy themselves as to the overall tax consequences by consulting their own tax advisers.
Dividends. If Ryanair Holdings pays dividends or makes other relevant distributions, the following is relevant:
Withholding Tax. Unless exempted, a withholding at the standard rate of income tax (currently 20%) will apply to dividends or other relevant distributions paid by an Irish resident company. The withholding tax requirement will not apply to distributions paid to certain categories of Irish resident stockholders or to distributions paid to certain categories of non-resident stockholders.
The following Irish resident stockholders are exempt from withholding if they make to the Company, in advance of payment of any relevant distribution, an appropriate declaration of entitlement to exemption:
| Irish resident companies; |
| Pension schemes approved by the Irish Revenue Commissioners (Irish Revenue); |
| Qualifying fund managers or qualifying savings managers; |
| Personal Retirement Savings Account (PRSA) administrators who receive the relevant distribution as income arising in respect of PRSA assets; |
88
| Qualifying employee share ownership trusts; |
| Collective investment undertakings; |
| Tax-exempt charities; |
| Designated brokers receiving the distribution for special portfolio investment accounts; |
| Any person who is entitled to exemption from income tax under Schedule F on dividends in respect of an investment in whole or in part of payments received in respect of a civil action or from the Personal Injuries Assessment Board for damages in respect of mental or physical infirmity; |
| Certain qualifying trusts established for the benefit of an incapacitated individual and/or persons in receipt of income from such a qualifying trust; |
| Any person entitled to exemption to income tax under Schedule F by virtue of Section 192(2) Taxes Consolidation Act (TCA) 1997; |
| Unit trusts to which Section 731(5)(a) TCA 1997 applies; and |
| Certain Irish Revenue-approved amateur and athletic sport bodies. |
The following non-resident stockholders are exempt from withholding if they make to the Company, in advance of payment of any dividend, an appropriate declaration of entitlement to exemption:
| Persons (other than a company) who (i) are neither resident nor ordinarily resident in Ireland and (ii) are resident for tax purposes in (a) a country which has signed a tax treaty with Ireland (a tax treaty country) or (b) an EU member state other than Ireland; |
| Companies not resident in Ireland which are resident in an EU member state or a tax treaty country, by virtue of the law of an EU member state or a tax treaty country and are not controlled, directly or indirectly, by Irish residents; |
| Companies not resident in Ireland which are directly or indirectly controlled by a person or persons who are, by virtue of the law of a tax treaty country or an EU member state, resident for tax purposes in a tax treaty country or an EU member state other than Ireland and which are not controlled directly or indirectly by persons who are not resident for tax purposes in a tax treaty country or EU member state; |
| Companies not resident in Ireland the principal class of shares of which is substantially and regularly traded on a recognized stock exchange in a tax treaty country or an EU member state including Ireland or on an approved stock exchange; or |
| Companies not resident in Ireland that are 75% subsidiaries of a single company, or are wholly-owned by two or more companies, in either case the principal classes of shares of which is or are substantially and regularly traded on a recognized stock exchange in a tax treaty country or an EU member state including Ireland or on an approved stock exchange. |
In the case of an individual non-resident stockholder resident in an EU member state or tax treaty country, the declaration must be accompanied by a current certificate of tax residence from the tax authorities in the stockholders country of residence. In the case of both an individual and corporate non-resident stockholder resident in an EU member state or tax treaty country the declaration also must contain an undertaking by the individual or corporate non-resident stockholder that he, she or it will advise the Company accordingly if he, she or it ceases to meet the conditions to be entitled to the DWT exemption. No declaration is required if the stockholder is a 5%
89
parent company in another EU member state in accordance with section 831 TCA 1997. Neither is a declaration required on the payment by a company resident in Ireland to another company so resident if the company making the dividend is a 51% subsidiary of that other company.
American Depositary Receipts. Special arrangements with regard to the dividend withholding tax obligation apply in the case of Irish companies using ADRs through U.S. depositary banks that have been authorized by the Irish Revenue. Such banks, which receive dividends from the company and pass them on to the U.S. ADS holders beneficially entitled to such dividends, will be allowed to receive and pass on the gross dividends (i.e., before withholding) based on an address system where the recorded addresses of such holder, as listed in the depositary banks register of depositary receipts, is in the United States.
Taxation on Dividends. Companies resident in Ireland other than those taxable on receipt of dividends as trading income are exempt from corporation tax on distributions received on Ordinary Shares from other Irish resident companies. Stockholders that are close companies for Irish taxation purposes may, however, be subject to a 20% corporation tax surcharge on undistributed investment income.
Individual stockholders who are resident or ordinarily resident in Ireland are subject to income tax on the gross dividend at their marginal tax rate, but are entitled to a credit for the tax withheld by the company paying the dividend. The dividend will also be subject to the universal social charge. An individual stockholder who is not liable or not fully liable for income tax by reason of exemption or otherwise may be entitled to receive an appropriate refund of tax withheld. A charge to Irish social security taxes can also arise for such individuals on the amount of any dividend received from the Company.
Except in certain circumstances, a person who is neither resident nor ordinarily resident in Ireland and is entitled to receive dividends without deductions is not liable for Irish tax on the dividends. Where a person who is neither resident nor ordinarily resident in Ireland is subject to withholding tax on the dividend received due to not benefiting from any exemption from such withholding, the amount of that withholding will generally satisfy such persons liability for Irish tax.
Capital Gains Tax. A person who is either resident or ordinarily resident in Ireland will generally be liable for Irish capital gains tax on any gain realized on the disposal of the Ordinary Shares or ADSs. The current capital gains tax rate is 33%. A person who is neither resident nor ordinarily resident in Ireland and who does not carry on a trade in Ireland through a branch or agency will not be subject to Irish capital gains tax on the disposal of the Ordinary Shares or ADSs.
Irish Capital Acquisitions Tax. A gift or inheritance of the Ordinary Shares or ADSs will be within the charge to Irish Capital Acquisitions Tax (CAT) notwithstanding that the donor or the donee/successor in relation to such gift or inheritance is resident outside Ireland. CAT is charged at a rate of 33% above a tax-free threshold. This tax-free threshold is determined by the amount of the current benefit and of previous benefits taken since December 5, 1991, as relevant, within the charge to CAT and the relationship between the donor and the successor or donee. Gifts and inheritances between spouses (and in certain cases former spouses) are not subject to CAT.
In a case where an inheritance or gift of the Ordinary Shares or ADSs is subject to both Irish CAT and foreign tax of a similar character, the foreign tax paid may in certain circumstances be credited in whole or in part against the Irish tax.
Irish Stamp Duty. It is assumed for the purposes of this paragraph that ADSs are dealt in on a recognized stock exchange in the United States (NASDAQ is a recognized stock exchange in the United States for this purpose). Under current Irish law, no stamp duty will be payable on the acquisition of ADSs by persons purchasing such ADSs or on any subsequent transfer of ADSs. A transfer of Ordinary Shares (including transfers effected through Euroclear U.K. & Ireland Limited) wherever executed and whether on sale, in contemplation of a sale or by way of a gift, will be subject to duty at the rate of 1% of the consideration given or, in the case of a gift or if the purchase price is inadequate or unascertainable, on the market value of the Ordinary Shares. Transfers of Ordinary Shares that are not liable for duty at the rate of 1% (e.g., transfers under which there is no change in beneficial ownership) may be subject to a fixed duty of 12.50.
90
The Irish Revenue treats a conversion of Ordinary Shares to ADSs made in contemplation of a sale or a change in beneficial ownership (under Irish law) as an event subject to stamp duty at a rate of 1%. The Irish Revenue has indicated that a re-conversion of ADSs to Ordinary Shares made in contemplation of a sale or a change in beneficial ownership (under Irish law) will not be subject to a stamp duty. However, the subsequent sale of the re-converted Ordinary Shares will give rise to Irish stamp duty at the 1% rate. If the transfer of the Ordinary Shares is a transfer under which there is no change in the beneficial ownership (under Irish law) of the Ordinary Shares being transferred, nominal stamp duty only will be payable on the transfer. Under Irish law, it is not clear whether the mere deposit of Ordinary Shares for ADSs or ADSs for Ordinary Shares would be deemed to constitute a change in beneficial ownership. Accordingly, it is possible that holders would be subject to stamp duty at the 1% rate when merely depositing Ordinary Shares for ADSs or ADSs for Ordinary Shares and, consequently, the Depositary reserves the right in such circumstances to require payment of stamp duty at the rate of 1% from the holders.
The person accountable for payment of stamp duty is the transferee or, in the case of a transfer by way of a gift or for a consideration less than the market value, all parties to the transfer. Stamp duty is normally payable within 30 days after the date of execution of the transfer. Late or inadequate payment of stamp duty will result in liability for interest, penalties and fines.
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
Except as described below under the heading Non-U.S. Holders, the following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of Ordinary Shares or ADRs by a holder that is a citizen or resident of the United States, a U.S. domestic corporation or otherwise subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis in respect of the Ordinary Shares or the ADRs (U.S. Holders). This summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase the Ordinary Shares or the ADRs. In particular, the summary deals only with U.S. Holders that will hold Ordinary Shares or ADRs as capital assets and generally does not address the tax treatment of U.S. Holders that may be subject to special tax rules such as banks, insurance companies, dealers in securities or currencies, partnerships or partners therein, entities subject to the branch profits tax, traders in securities electing to mark to market, persons that own 10% or more of the stock of the Company, U.S. Holders whose functional currency is not U.S. dollars or persons that hold the Ordinary Shares or the ADRs as part of an integrated investment (including a straddle) consisting of the Ordinary Shares or the ADRs and one or more other positions.
Holders of the Ordinary Shares or the ADRs should consult their own tax advisors as to the U.S. or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of the Ordinary Shares or the ADRs in light of their particular circumstances, including, in particular, the effect of any foreign, state or local tax laws.
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, holders of the ADRs will be treated as the owners of the Ordinary Shares represented by those ADRs.
Taxation of Dividends
Dividends, if any, paid with respect to the Ordinary Shares, including Ordinary Shares represented by ADRs, will be included in the gross income of a U.S. Holder when the dividends are received by the holder or the Depositary. Such dividends generally should not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to U.S. corporations in respect of dividends from a domestic corporation. Dividends paid in euro will be includible in the income of a U.S. Holder in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the day they are received by the holder or the Depositary. U.S. Holders generally should not be required to recognize any foreign currency gain or loss to the extent such dividends paid in Euro are converted into U.S. dollars immediately upon receipt.
Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by an individual on or post January 1, 2013 with respect to the Ordinary Shares or ADRs will be subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 20% if the dividends are qualified dividends (apart from the Medicare contribution tax referred to below), and the individual has taxable income that exceeds certain thresholds. Dividends paid on the Ordinary Shares or ADRs will be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the issuer is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States that the Internal Revenue Service has approved for the
91
purposes of the qualified dividend rules and (ii) the Company was not, in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and is not, in the year in which the dividend is paid, a passive foreign investment company (a PFIC). The income tax treaty between Ireland and the United States has been approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules. Effective January 1, 2013, a Medicare contribution tax of 3.8% may also be applicable to U.S. individuals, estates and trusts. Based on the Companys audited financial statements and relevant market data, the Company believes that it was not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to its 2013/14 taxable year. In addition, based on the Companys audited financial statements and its current expectations regarding the value and nature of its assets, the sources and nature of its income, and relevant market data, the Company does not anticipate becoming a PFIC for its 2014/15 taxable year. Under the U.S.-Ireland Income Tax Treaty currently in effect, in the event the Company were to pay any dividend, the tax credit attaching to the dividend (as used herein the Tax Credit; see Irish Tax Considerations) generally will be treated as a foreign income tax eligible for credit against such U.S. Holders United States federal income tax liability, subject to generally applicable limitations and conditions. Any such dividend paid by the Company to such U.S. Holder will constitute income from sources outside the United States for foreign tax credit purposes, and generally will constitute passive category income for such purposes.
Foreign tax credits may not be allowed for withholding taxes imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in securities.
U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the implications of these rules in light of their particular circumstances.
Distributions of Ordinary Shares that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all stockholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
Taxation of Capital Gains
Sale or Disposition of Ordinary Shares or ADRs. Gains or losses realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or other disposition of ADRs generally will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as capital gains or losses, which generally will be long-term capital gains or losses if the ADRs have been held for more than one year. The net amount of long-term capital gain recognized by an individual holder post January 1, 2013 generally is subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 20%. Effective January 1, 2013, a Medicare contribution tax of 3.8% may also be applicable to U.S. individuals, estates and trusts. Gains realized by a U.S. Holder generally will constitute income from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit purposes and generally will constitute passive category income for such purposes. The deductibility of capital losses, in excess of capital gains, is subject to limitations.
Deposits and withdrawals of Ordinary Shares by U.S. Holders in exchange for ADRs will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Non-U.S. Holders. A holder of Ordinary Shares or ADRs that is, with respect to the United States, a foreign corporation or a nonresident alien individual (a Non-U.S. Holder) generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on dividends received on such Ordinary Shares or ADRs unless such income is effectively connected with the conduct by such holder of a trade or business in the United States. A Non-U.S. Holder of ADRs or Ordinary Shares will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax in respect of gain realized on the sale or other disposition of Ordinary Shares or ADRs, unless (i) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by such holder of a trade or business in the United States or (ii) in the case of gain realized by an individual Non-U.S. Holder, such Non-U.S. Holder is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.
Copies of Ryanair Holdings Articles may be examined at its registered office and principal place of business at its Corporate Head Office, Airside Business Park, Swords, County Dublin, Ireland.
92
Ryanair Holdings also files reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F, periodic reports on Form 6-K and other information, with the SEC pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC that apply to foreign private issuers. You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Ryanair is exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and currency exchange rates. The objective of financial risk management at Ryanair is to minimize the negative impact of commodity price, interest rate and foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the Companys earnings, cash flows and equity.
To manage these risks, Ryanair uses various derivative financial instruments, including cross currency interest rate swaps, foreign currency forward contracts and commodity forwards. These derivative financial instruments are generally held to maturity and are not actively traded. The Company enters into these arrangements with the goal of hedging its operational and balance sheet risk. However, Ryanairs exposure to commodity price, interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations cannot be neutralized completely.
In executing its risk management strategy, Ryanair currently enters into forward contracts for the purchase of some of the jet fuel (jet kerosene) that it expects to use. It also uses foreign currency forward contracts intended to reduce its exposure to risks related to foreign currencies, principally the U.S. dollar. Furthermore, it enters into interest rate contracts with the objective of fixing certain borrowing costs and hedging principal repayments, particularly those associated with the purchase of new Boeing 737-800s. Ryanair is also exposed to the risk that the counterparties to its derivative financial instruments may not be creditworthy. Were a counterparty to default on its obligations under any of the instruments described below, Ryanairs economic expectations when entering into these arrangements might not be achieved and its financial condition could be adversely affected. Transactions involving derivative financial instruments are also relatively illiquid as compared with those involving other kinds of financial instruments. It is Ryanairs policy not to enter into transactions involving financial derivatives for speculative purposes.
The following paragraphs describe Ryanairs fuel hedging, foreign currency and interest rate swap arrangements and analyze the sensitivity of the market value, earnings and cash flows of the financial instruments to hypothetical changes in commodity prices, interest rates and exchange rates as if these changes had occurred at March 31, 2014. The range of changes selected for this sensitivity analysis reflects Ryanairs view of the changes that are reasonably possible over a one-year period.
FUEL PRICE EXPOSURE AND HEDGING
Fuel costs constitute a substantial portion of Ryanairs operating expenses (approximately 46.0% and 45.3% of such expenses in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively, after taking into account Ryanairs fuel hedging activities). Ryanair engages in fuel price hedging transactions from time to time, pursuant to which Ryanair and a counterparty agree to exchange payments equal to the difference between a fixed price for a given quantity of jet fuel and the market price for such quantity of jet fuel at a given date in the future, with Ryanair receiving the amount of any excess of such market price over such fixed price and paying to the counterparty the amount of any deficit of such fixed price under such market price.
Ryanair has historically entered into arrangements providing for substantial protection against fluctuations in fuel prices, generally through forward contracts covering periods of up to 18 months of anticipated jet fuel requirements. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyChanges in Fuel Costs and Fuel Availability Affect the Companys Results and Increases the Likelihood that the Company May Incur
93
Losses for additional information on recent trends in fuel costs and the Companys related hedging activities, as well as certain associated risks. See also Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsFiscal Year 2014 Compared with Fiscal Year 2013Fuel and Oil. As of July 25, 2014, Ryanair had entered into forward jet fuel (jet kerosene) contracts covering approximately 90% of its estimated requirements for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015 at prices equivalent to approximately $950 per metric ton. In addition, as of July 25, 2014, Ryanair had entered into forward jet fuel (jet kerosene) contracts covering approximately 55% of its estimated requirements for the first half of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016 at prices equivalent to approximately $950 per metric ton, and had not entered into any jet fuel hedging contracts with respect to its expected fuel purchases beyond that period.
While these hedging strategies can cushion the impact on Ryanair of fuel price increases in the short term, in the medium to longer-term, such strategies cannot be expected to eliminate the impact on the Company of an increase in the market price of jet fuel. The unrealized gains on outstanding forward agreements at March 31, 2014 and 2013, based on their fair values, amounted to 17.2 million and 34.9 million (gross of tax), respectively. Based on Ryanairs fuel consumption for the 2014 fiscal year, a change of $1.00 in the average annual price per metric ton of jet fuel would have caused a change of approximately 2.0 million in Ryanairs fuel costs. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyChanges in Fuel Costs and Fuel Availability Affect the Companys Results and Increase the Likelihood that the Company May Incur Losses.
Under IFRS, the Companys fuel forward contracts are treated as cash-flow hedges of forecast fuel purchases for risks arising from the commodity price of fuel. The contracts are recorded at fair value in the balance sheet and are re-measured to fair value at the end of each fiscal period through equity to the extent effective, with any ineffectiveness recorded through the income statement. The Company has considered these hedges to be highly effective in offsetting variability in future cash flows arising from fluctuations in the market price of jet fuel because the jet fuel forward contracts typically relate to the same quantity, time, and location of delivery as the forecast jet fuel purchase being hedged and the duration of the contracts is typically short. Accordingly, the quantification of the change in expected cash flows of the forecast jet fuel purchase is based on the jet fuel forward price, and in the 2014 fiscal year, the Company recorded no hedge ineffectiveness within earnings. The Company has recorded no level of ineffectiveness on its jet fuel hedges in its income statements to date. In the 2014 fiscal year, the Company recorded a positive fair-value adjustment of 15.0 million (net of tax) within accumulated other comprehensive income in respect of jet fuel forward contracts, and in the 2013 fiscal year, the Company recorded a positive fair-value adjustment of 30.6 million (net of tax) within accumulated other comprehensive income.
94
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXPOSURE AND HEDGING
In recent years, Ryanairs revenues have been denominated primarily in two currencies, the euro and U.K. pound sterling. The U.K. pound sterling and the euro accounted for approximately 25% and 63%, respectively, of Ryanairs total revenues in both the 2014 and 2013 fiscal years. As Ryanair reports its results in euro, the Company is not exposed to any material currency risk as a result of its euro-denominated activities. Ryanairs operating expenses are primarily denominated in euro, U.K. pounds sterling and U.S. dollars. Ryanairs operations can be subject to significant direct exchange rate risks between the euro and the U.S. dollar because a significant portion of its operating costs (particularly those related to fuel purchases) is incurred in U.S. dollars, while none of its revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars. Appreciation of the euro against the U.S. dollar positively impacts Ryanairs operating income because the euro equivalent of its U.S. dollar operating costs decreases, while depreciation of the euro against the U.S. dollar negatively impacts operating income. It is Ryanairs policy to hedge a significant portion of its exposure to fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the euro. From time to time, Ryanair hedges its operating surpluses and shortfalls in U.K. pound sterling. Ryanair matches certain U.K. pound sterling costs with U.K. pound sterling revenues and may choose to sell any surplus U.K. pound sterling cash flows for euro.
Hedging associated with the income statement. In the 2014 and 2013 fiscal years, the Company entered into a series of forward contracts, principally euro/U.S. dollar forward contracts to hedge against variability in cash flows arising from market fluctuations in foreign exchange rates associated with its forecast fuel, maintenance and insurance costs and euro/U.K. pound sterling forward contracts to hedge certain surplus U.K. pound sterling cash flows. At March 31, 2014, the total unrealized loss relating to these contracts amounted to 51.2 million, compared to a 47.4 million unrealized gain at March 31, 2013.
Under IFRS, these foreign currency forward contracts are treated as cash-flow hedges of forecast U.S. dollar and U.K. pound sterling purchases to address the risks arising from U.S. dollar and U.K. pound sterling exchange rates. The derivatives are recorded at fair value in the balance sheet and are re-measured to fair value at the end of each reporting period through equity to the extent effective, with ineffectiveness recorded through the income statement. Ryanair considers these hedges to be highly effective in offsetting variability in future cash flows arising from fluctuations in exchange rates, because the forward contracts are timed so as to match exactly the amount, currency and maturity date of the forecast foreign currency-denominated expense being hedged. In the 2014 fiscal year, the Company recorded a negative fair-value adjustment of 86.3 million (net of tax) within accumulated other comprehensive income in respect of these contracts, as compared to a negative adjustment of 42.3 million in the 2013 fiscal year.
Hedging associated with the balance sheet. In prior years, the Company entered into a series of cross currency interest rate swaps to manage exposures to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates of US dollar-denominated floating rate borrowings, together with managing the exposures to fluctuations in interest rates on these US dollar-denominated floating rate borrowings. Cross currency interest rate swaps are primarily used to convert a portion of the Companys U.S. dollar-denominated debt to euro and floating rate interest exposures into fixed rate exposures and are set so as to match exactly the critical terms of the underlying debt being hedged (i.e. notional principal, interest rate settings, re-pricing dates). These are all classified as cash-flow hedges of the forecasted U.S. dollar variable interest payments on the Companys underlying debt and have been determined to be highly effective in achieving offsetting cash flows. Accordingly, no ineffectiveness has been recorded in the income statement relating to these hedges.
At March 31, 2014, the fair value of the cross currency interest rate swap agreements relating to this U.S. dollar-denominated floating rate debt was represented by a loss of 25.9 million (gross of tax) compared to a loss of 11.7 million in fiscal 2013. In the 2014 fiscal year, the Company recorded a negative fair-value adjustment of 12.4 million (net of tax), compared to a loss of 3.7 million in fiscal 2013, within accumulated other comprehensive income in respect of these contracts.
Hedging associated with capital expenditures. During the 2014 and 2013 fiscal years, the Company also entered into a series of euro/U.S. dollar contracts to hedge against changes in the fair value of aircraft purchase commitments under the Boeing contracts, which arise from fluctuations in the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rates. There were no such contracts in effect at March 31, 2013. At March 31, 2014, the total unrealized loss relating to these contracts amounted to 15.0 million.
95
Under IFRS, the Company generally accounts for these contracts as either cash-flow hedges or fair-value hedges. Fair-value hedges are recorded in the balance sheet at fair value. Any gains or losses arising on these instruments, as well as the related gain or loss on the underlying aircraft purchase commitment, are recorded in the balance sheet. Any related ineffectiveness is measured by the amount by which these adjustments to earnings do not match. Cash-flow hedges are recorded at fair value in the balance sheet and are re-measured to fair value at the end of the financial period through equity to the extent effective, with any ineffectiveness recorded through the income statement. The Company has found these hedges to be highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of the aircraft purchase commitments arising from fluctuations in exchange rates because the forward exchange contracts are always for the same amount, currency and maturity dates as the corresponding aircraft purchase commitments.
At March 31, 2014, the total unrealized losses relating to these contracts amounted to 15.0 million, while at March 31, 2013 unrealized gains amounted to nil. Under IFRS, the Company recorded fair-value adjustments of 13.1 million and fair-value adjustments of nil for cash-flow hedges in the 2014 and 2013 fiscal years, respectively. No amounts were recorded for such fair-value hedges from other accumulated comprehensive income in the 2014 and 2013 fiscal years.
Holding other variables constant, if there were an adverse change of 10% in relevant foreign currency exchange rates, the market value of Ryanairs foreign currency contracts outstanding at March 31, 2014 would decrease by approximately 294.0 million (net of tax), all of which would ultimately impact earnings when such contracts mature.
INTEREST RATE EXPOSURE AND HEDGING
The Companys purchase of 246 of the 297 Boeing 737-800 aircraft in the fleet as of March 31, 2014 has been funded by bank financing in the form of loans supported by a loan guarantee from Ex-Im Bank (with respect to 210 aircraft), JOLCOs and commercial debt. With respect to these 246 aircraft, at March 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding cumulative borrowings under these facilities of 3,083.6 million with a weighted average interest rate of 2.49%. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital Resources for additional information on these facilities and the related swaps, including a tabular summary of the Effective Borrowing Profile illustrating the effect of the swap transactions (each of which is with an established international financial counterparty) on the profile of Ryanairs aircraft-related debt at March 31, 2014. At March 31, 2014, the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements relating to this floating rate debt was represented by a loss of 72.4 million (gross of tax), as compared with a loss of 81.9 million at March 31, 2013. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 for additional information.
If Ryanair had not entered into such derivative agreements, a plus or minus one percentage point movement in interest rates would impact the fair value of this liability by approximately 16.7 million. The earnings and cash-flow impact of any such change in interest rates would have been approximately plus or minus 18 million in the 2014 fiscal year.
96
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
Holders of ADSs are required to pay certain fees and expenses. The table below sets forth the fees and expenses which, under the deposit agreement between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, holders of ADRs can be charged or be deducted from dividends or other distributions on the deposited shares. The Company and The Bank of New York Mellon have also entered into a separate letter agreement, which has the effect of reducing some of the fees listed below.
Persons depositing or withdrawing ADSs must pay: |
For: | |
$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs). | Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of common shares or rights or other property. | |
Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates. | ||
$0.02 (or less) per ADS. | Any cash distribution to the holder of the ADSs. | |
$0.02 (or less) per ADS per calendar year. | Depositary services. | |
A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to the holder of ADSs had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs. | Distribution of securities distributed by the issuer to the holders of common securities, which are distributed by the depositary to ADS holders. | |
Registration or transfer fees. | Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when the holder of ADSs deposits or withdraws common shares. | |
Expenses of the depositary. | Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided for in the deposit agreement). | |
Expenses of the depositary in converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars. | ||
Taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADSs or common shares underlying ADSs (for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes). | As necessary. | |
Any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities. | As necessary. |
Reimbursement of Fees
From April 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014 the Depositary collected annual depositary services fees equal to approximately $3.0 million from holders of ADSs, net of fees paid to the Depositary by the Company.
97
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company has carried out an evaluation, as of March 31, 2014, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon the Companys evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of March 31, 2014, the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
MANAGEMENTS ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Companys internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. The Companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
| pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; |
| provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and |
| provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
The Companys management evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in the 1992 Framework in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the evaluation, management has concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG, has issued an auditors report on the Companys internal control over financial reporting, which is included in its entirety below.
98
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Ryanair Holdings plc:
We have audited Ryanair Holdings plcs (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework 1992 issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, appearing under Item 15 in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework 1992 issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2014, and our report dated July 25, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG
Dublin, Ireland
July 25, 2014
99
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the 2014 fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Companys Board of Directors has determined that Declan McKeon qualifies as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of this Item 16A. Mr. McKeon is independent for purposes of the listing rules of NASDAQ.
The Company has adopted a broad Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that meets the requirements for a code of ethics as defined in Item 16B of Form 20-F. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to the Companys chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, controller and persons performing similar functions, as well as to all of the Companys other officers, directors and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on Ryanairs website at http://www.ryanair.com. (Information appearing on the website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report.) The Company has not made any amendment to, or granted any waiver from, the provisions of this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, controller or persons performing similar functions during its most recently completed fiscal year.
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The following table sets forth the fees billed or billable to the Company by its independent auditors, KPMG, during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
Audit fees |
| 0.5 | | 0.5 | | 0.4 | ||||||
Tax fees |
| 0.3 | | 0.3 | | 0.4 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total fees |
| 0.8 | | 0.8 | | 0.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed or billable by KPMG in connection with the audit of the Companys annual financial statements, as well as work that generally only the independent auditor can reasonably be expected to provide, including the provision of comfort letters, statutory audits, discussions surrounding the proper application of financial accounting and reporting standards and services provided in connection with certain regulatory requirements including those under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Tax fees include fees for all services, except those services specifically related to the audit of financial statements, performed by the independent auditors tax personnel, work performed in support of other tax-related regulatory requirements and tax compliance reporting.
100
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The audit committee expressly pre-approves every engagement of Ryanairs independent auditors for all audit and non-audit services provided to the Company.
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
None.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table details purchases by the Company of its Ordinary shares in the 2014 fiscal year.
Month / Period |
Total Number of Ordinary Shares Purchased (a) |
Average Price Paid Per Ordinary Share |
||||||
(Millions) | () | |||||||
April 1, 2013 to April 30, 2013 |
| | ||||||
May 1, 2013 to May 31, 2013 |
| | ||||||
June 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013 |
24.1 | 7.23 | ||||||
July 1, 2013 to July 31, 2013 |
| | ||||||
August 1, 2013 to August 31, 2013 |
| | ||||||
September 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013 |
| | ||||||
October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013 |
10.0 | 7.38 | ||||||
November 1, 2013 to November 30, 2013 |
10.0 | 5.75 | ||||||
December 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 |
15.5 | 6.66 | ||||||
January 1, 2014 to January 31, 2014 |
4.7 | 6.55 | ||||||
February 1, 2014 to February 28, 2014 |
3.8 | 6.79 | ||||||
March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014 |
1.4 | 7.31 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total (Year-end) |
69.5 | 6.93 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | The Ordinary Share purchases in the table above have not been made pursuant to publicly announced plans or programs, and consist of open-market transactions conducted within defined parameters pursuant to the Companys repurchase authority from shareholders granted via a special resolution. The Ordinary Share purchases in the table above include the purchase during fiscal year 2014 of just over 6.0 million ADRs. Each ADR purchased represents five Ordinary Shares. |
See Item 8. Financial InformationOther Financial InformationShare Buy-Back Program and Item 9. The Offer and ListingTrading Markets and Share Prices for further information regarding the Companys Ordinary Share buy-back program, pursuant to which all of the shares purchased by the Company and disclosed in the table above were purchased.
Item 16F. Change in Registrants Certified Accountant
Not applicable.
101
Item 16G. Corporate Governance
See Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and EmployeesDirectorsExemptions from NASDAQ Corporate Governance Rules for further information regarding the ways in which the Companys corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies listed on NASDAQ.
Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
RYANAIR HOLDINGS PLC
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
F-1 | ||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
F-5 | ||||
F-7 | ||||
F-8 |
102
1.1 | Memorandum and Articles of Association of Ryanair Holdings in effect as of the date of this Annual Report (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Ryanair Holdings Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on July 31, 2012 (Commission file No. 000-29304)). | |
2.1 | Issue and Paying Agency Agreement, dated 29 May 2014, between Ryanair Limited, Ryanair Holdings as guarantor, Citibank N.A., London Branch as fiscal agent, Citigroup Global Markets Deutschland AG as registrar, the paying agents named therein and the transfer agents named therein. | |
2.2 | Deed of Covenant, dated 29 May 2014, entered into by Ryanair Limited. | |
2.3 | Deed of Guarantee, dated 29 May 2014, entered into by Ryanair Holdings as guarantor. | |
The total amount of each of the other long-term debt securities of Ryanair Holdings authorized under any instrument does not exceed 10.0% of the total assets of the Company on a consolidated basis. Ryanair Holdings hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request a copy of any instrument defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant or of its subsidiaries for which consolidated or unconsolidated financial statements are required to be filed. | ||
4.1 | Purchase Agreement No. 2403 between The Boeing Company and Ryanair Holdings plc relating to Model Boeing 737-800 aircraft, together with ancillary documents (subject to a request for confidential treatment that has been granted) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Ryanair Holdings Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on September 30, 2002 (Commission file No. 000-29304)). | |
4.2 | Supplemental Agreement No. 6 to Purchase Agreement 2403 between The Boeing Company and Ryanair Holdings plc relating to Model Boeing 737-800 aircraft, dated as of February 28, 2005, together with ancillary documents (subject to a request for confidential treatment that has been granted) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Ryanair Holdings Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on September 30, 2005 (Commission file No. 000-29304)). | |
4.3 | Purchase Agreement No. 3941 between The Boeing Company and Aviation Finance and Leasing S.a.r.l. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Ryanair Ltd relating to Model Boeing 737-800 aircraft, together with ancillary documents (subject to a request for confidential treatment that has been granted) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Ryanair Holdings Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on July 31, 2013 (Commission file No. 000-29304)). | |
8.1 | List of principal subsidiaries of the registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8.1 of Ryanair Holdings Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on September 20, 2007 (Commission file No. 000-29304)). | |
12.1 | Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
13.1 | Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
RYANAIR HOLDINGS PLC | ||
/S/ MICHAEL O LEARY | ||
Name: | Michael OLeary | |
Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Director | |
Date: July 25, 2014 |
103
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Ryanair Holdings plc:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ryanair Holdings plc and subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2014. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ryanair Holdings plc and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2014, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and also IFRS as adopted by the European Union.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Ryanair Holdings plcs internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework 1992 issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated July 25, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
KPMG
Dublin, Ireland
July 25, 2014
F-1
At March 31, 2014 |
At March 31, 2013 |
At March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||
Note | M | M | M | |||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
2 | 5,060.3 | 4,906.3 | 4,925.2 | ||||||||||||
Intangible assets |
3 | 46.8 | 46.8 | 46.8 | ||||||||||||
Available for sale financial assets |
4 | 260.3 | 221.2 | 149.7 | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
5 | 0.4 | 5.1 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total non-current assets |
5,367.8 | 5,179.4 | 5,125.0 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||||
Inventories |
6 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||
Other assets |
7 | 124.2 | 67.7 | 64.9 | ||||||||||||
Current tax |
12 | 1.1 | | 9.3 | ||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
8 | 58.1 | 56.1 | 51.5 | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
5 | 16.7 | 78.1 | 231.9 | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
9 | 13.3 | 24.7 | 35.1 | ||||||||||||
Financial assets: cash > 3 months |
1,498.3 | 2,293.4 | 772.2 | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
1,730.1 | 1,240.9 | 2,708.3 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total current assets |
3,444.3 | 3,763.6 | 3,876.0 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total assets |
8,812.1 | 8,943.0 | 9,001.0 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
150.0 | 138.3 | 181.2 | |||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
10 | 1,561.2 | 1,341.4 | 1,237.2 | ||||||||||||
Current maturities of debt |
11 | 467.9 | 399.9 | 368.4 | ||||||||||||
Current tax |
12 | | 0.3 | | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
5 | 95.4 | 31.8 | 28.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
2,274.5 | 1,911.7 | 1,815.0 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Provisions |
13 | 133.9 | 135.9 | 103.2 | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
5 | 43.2 | 50.1 | 53.6 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax |
12 | 368.6 | 346.5 | 319.4 | ||||||||||||
Other creditors |
14 | 90.4 | 127.8 | 146.3 | ||||||||||||
Non-current maturities of debt |
11 | 2,615.7 | 3,098.4 | 3,256.8 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total non-current liabilities |
3,251.8 | 3,758.7 | 3,879.3 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
||||||||||||||||
Issued share capital |
15 | 8.8 | 9.2 | 9.3 | ||||||||||||
Share premium account |
15 | 704.2 | 687.8 | 666.4 | ||||||||||||
Capital redemption reserve |
1.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | |||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
2,465.1 | 2,418.6 | 2,400.1 | |||||||||||||
Other reserves |
16 | 106.5 | 156.2 | 230.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
3,285.8 | 3,272.6 | 3,306.7 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
8,812.1 | 8,943.0 | 9,001.0 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial information.
F-2
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||
Note | M | M | M | |||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Scheduled revenues |
17 | 3,789.5 | 3,819.8 | 3,504.0 | ||||||||||||
Ancillary revenues |
17 | 1,247.2 | 1,064.2 | 886.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total operating revenues continuing operations |
17 | 5,036.7 | 4,884.0 | 4,390.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Fuel and oil |
(2,013.1 | ) | (1,885.6 | ) | (1,593.6 | ) | ||||||||||
Airport and handling charges |
(617.2 | ) | (611.6 | ) | (554.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Route charges |
(522.0 | ) | (486.6 | ) | (460.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Staff costs |
18 | (463.6 | ) | (435.6 | ) | (415.0 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation |
2 | (351.8 | ) | (329.6 | ) | (309.2 | ) | |||||||||
Marketing, distribution and other |
(192.8 | ) | (197.9 | ) | (180.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
(116.1 | ) | (120.7 | ) | (104.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Aircraft rentals |
(101.5 | ) | (98.2 | ) | (90.7 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
(4,378.1 | ) | (4,165.8 | ) | (3,707.0 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating profit continuing operations |
658.6 | 718.2 | 683.2 | |||||||||||||
Other income/(expense) |
||||||||||||||||
Finance expense |
20 | (83.2 | ) | (99.3 | ) | (109.2 | ) | |||||||||
Finance income |
16.5 | 27.4 | 44.3 | |||||||||||||
Foreign exchange (loss)/gain |
(0.5 | ) | 4.6 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
| | 10.4 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total other expense |
(67.2 | ) | (67.3 | ) | (50.2 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Profit before tax |
591.4 | 650.9 | 633.0 | |||||||||||||
Tax expense on profit on ordinary activities |
12 | (68.6 | ) | (81.6 | ) | (72.6 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Profit for the year all attributable to equity holders of parent |
522.8 | 569.3 | 560.4 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Basic earnings per ordinary share (euro cent) |
22 | 36.96 | 39.45 | 38.03 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per ordinary share (euro cent) |
22 | 36.86 | 39.33 | 37.94 | ||||||||||||
Number of ordinary shares (in Ms) |
22 | 1,414.6 | 1,443.1 | 1,473.7 | ||||||||||||
Number of diluted shares (in Ms) |
22 | 1,418.2 | 1,447.4 | 1,477.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial information.
F-3
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Profit for the year |
522.8 | 569.3 | 560.4 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||
Items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss: |
||||||||||||
Net actuarial (loss) from retirement benefit plans |
(1.6 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (6.3 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(1.6 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (6.3 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Items that may or will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: |
||||||||||||
Cash-flow hedge reserve-effective portion of fair value changes to derivatives: |
||||||||||||
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash-flow hedges |
(108.0 | ) | (128.4 | ) | 147.3 | |||||||
Net change in fair value of cash-flow hedges transferred to property, plant and equipment |
(0.1 | ) | 4.7 | (11.1 | ) | |||||||
Net change in fair value of cash-flow hedges transferred to profit or loss |
24.4 | (14.4 | ) | (255.0 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net movements in cash-flow hedge reserve |
(83.7 | ) | (138.1 | ) | (118.8 | ) | ||||||
Available for sale financial asset: |
||||||||||||
Net increase in fair value of available-for-sale asset |
39.1 | 71.5 | 35.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(44.6 | ) | (66.6 | ) | (83.1 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total other comprehensive expense for the year, net of income tax |
(46.2 | ) | (67.7 | ) | (89.4 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total comprehensive income for the year all attributable to equity holders of parent |
476.6 | 501.6 | 471.0 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial information.
F-4
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity
Other Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary Shares M |
Issued Share Capital M |
Share Premium Account M |
Retained Earnings M |
Capital Redemption M |
Hedging M |
Other Reserves M |
Total M |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
1,489.6 | 9.5 | 659.3 | 1,967.6 | 0.5 | 257.4 | 59.6 | 2,953.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
| | | 560.4 | | | | 560.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial losses from retirement benefits plan |
| | | (6.3 | ) | | | | (6.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net movements in cash-flow reserve |
| | | | | (118.8 | ) | | (118.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale asset |
| | | | | | 35.7 | 35.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income/(loss) |
| | | (6.3 | ) | | (118.8 | ) | 35.7 | (89.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | 554.1 | | (118.8 | ) | 35.7 | 471.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners of the Company, recognised directly in equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue of ordinary equity shares |
2.5 | | 7.1 | | | | | 7.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of ordinary equity shares |
| | | (124.6 | ) | | | | (124.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of repurchased ordinary shares |
(36.5 | ) | (0.2 | ) | | | 0.2 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based payments |
| | | | | | (0.7 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfer of exercised and expired share-based awards |
| | | 3.0 | | | (3.0 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2012 |
1,455.6 | 9.3 | 666.4 | 2,400.1 | 0.7 | 138.6 | 91.6 | 3,306.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
| | | 569.3 | | | | 569.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial losses from retirement benefits plan |
| | | (1.1 | ) | | | | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net movements in cash-flow reserve |
| | | | | (138.1 | ) | | (138.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale asset |
| | | | | | 71.5 | 71.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income/(loss) |
| | | (1.1 | ) | | (138.1 | ) | 71.5 | (67.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | 568.2 | | (138.1 | ) | 71.5 | 501.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners of the Company, recognised directly in equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue of ordinary equity shares |
6.5 | | 21.4 | | | | | 21.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of ordinary equity shares |
| | | (67.5 | ) | | | | (67.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of repurchased ordinary shares |
(15.0 | ) | (0.1 | ) | | | 0.1 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based payments |
| | | | | | 1.9 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend Paid |
| | | (491.5 | ) | | | | (491.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfer of exercised share-based awards |
| | | 9.3 | | | (9.3 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2013 |
1,447.1 | 9.2 | 687.8 | 2,418.6 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 155.7 | 3,272.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity Continued
Other Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary Shares M |
Issued Share Capital M |
Share Premium Account M |
Retained Earnings M |
Capital Redemption Reserve M |
Hedging M |
Other Reserves M |
Total M |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
| | | 522.8 | | | | 522.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial losses from retirement benefits plan |
| | | (1.6 | ) | | | | (1.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net movements in cash-flow reserve |
| | | | | (83.7 | ) | | (83.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale asset |
| | | | | | 39.1 | 39.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income/(loss) |
| | | (1.6 | ) | | (83.7 | ) | 39.1 | (46.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income... |
| | | 521.2 | | (83.7 | ) | 39.1 | 476.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners of the Company, recognised directly in equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue of ordinary equity shares |
5.7 | | 16.4 | | | | | 16.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based payments |
| | | | | | 1.9 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of ordinary equity shares |
| | | (481.7 | ) | | | | (481.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of repurchased ordinary shares |
(69.5 | ) | (0.4 | ) | | | 0.4 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfer of exercised and expired share-based awards |
| | | 7.0 | | | (7.0 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2014 |
1,383.3 | 8.8 | 704.2 | 2,465.1 | 1.2 | (83.2 | ) | 189.7 | 3,285.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial information.
F-6
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||
Profit after tax |
522.8 | 569.3 | 560.4 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile profit before tax to net cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||||||
Depreciation |
351.8 | 329.6 | 309.2 | |||||||||
Retirement costs |
(1.2 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | |||||||
Tax expense on profit on ordinary activities |
68.6 | 81.6 | 72.6 | |||||||||
Share-based payments charge/(credit) |
1.9 | 1.9 | (0.7 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease/(increase) in inventories |
0.2 | 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||
(Increase) in trade receivables |
(2.0 | ) | (4.6 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||||
(Increase)/decrease in other current assets |
(56.6 | ) | (5.0 | ) | 34.5 | |||||||
Increase/(decrease) in trade payables |
11.7 | (42.9 | ) | 30.4 | ||||||||
Increase in accrued expenses |
220.7 | 107.2 | 11.6 | |||||||||
(Decrease)/increase in other creditors |
(37.4 | ) | (18.5 | ) | 19.7 | |||||||
(Decrease)/increase in provisions |
(2.7 | ) | 31.1 | 6.6 | ||||||||
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
| | (10.4 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease in finance income |
0.1 | 2.2 | | |||||||||
(Decrease)/ increase in finance expense |
(0.9 | ) | (2.7 | ) | 1.1 | |||||||
Income tax (paid) |
(32.4 | ) | (25.8 | ) | (13.6 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
1,044.6 | 1,023.5 | 1,020.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditure (purchase of property, plant and equipment) |
(505.8 | ) | (310.7 | ) | (317.6 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
| | 27.2 | |||||||||
Decrease in restricted cash |
11.4 | 10.4 | 7.8 | |||||||||
Decrease/(increase) in financial assets: cash > 3 months |
795.1 | (1,521.2 | ) | 97.2 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash from/(used) in investing activities |
300.7 | (1,821.5 | ) | (185.4 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||
Shares purchased under share buy-back programme |
(481.7 | ) | (67.5 | ) | (124.6 | ) | ||||||
Net proceeds from shares issued |
16.4 | 21.4 | 7.1 | |||||||||
Dividend paid |
| (491.5 | ) | | ||||||||
Proceeds from long term borrowings |
| 234.6 | 292.3 | |||||||||
Repayments of long term borrowings |
(390.8 | ) | (366.4 | ) | (329.7 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(856.1 | ) | (669.4 | ) | (154.9 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
489.2 | (1,467.4 | ) | 680.0 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
1,240.9 | 2,708.3 | 2,028.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
1,730.1 | 1,240.9 | 2,708.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial information.
F-7
Notes forming part of the Consolidated Financial Statements
1 | Basis of preparation and significant accounting policies |
The accounting policies applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the 2014 fiscal year are set out below. These have been applied consistently for all periods presented, except as otherwise stated.
Business activity
Ryanair Limited and its subsidiaries (Ryanair Limited) has operated as an international airline since commencing operations in 1985. On August 23, 1996, Ryanair Holdings Limited, a newly formed holding company, acquired the entire issued share capital of Ryanair Limited. On May 16, 1997, Ryanair Holdings Limited re-registered as a public limited company, Ryanair Holdings plc (the Company). Ryanair Holdings plc and its subsidiaries are hereafter together referred to as Ryanair Holdings plc (or we, our, us, Ryanair or the Company) and currently operate a low-fares airline headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. All trading activity continues to be undertaken by the group of companies headed by Ryanair Limited.
Statement of compliance
In accordance with the International Accounting Standards (IAS) Regulation (EC 1606 (2002)) which applies throughout the European Union (EU), the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU (IFRS as adopted by the EU), which are effective for the year ended and as at March 31, 2014. In addition to complying with its legal obligation to comply with IFRS as adopted by the EU, the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) (IFRS as issued by the IASB). The consolidated financial statements have also been prepared in accordance with the Companies Acts, 1963 to 2013.
Details of legislative changes and new accounting standards or amendments to accounting standards, which are not yet effective and have not been early adopted in these consolidated financial statements, and the likely impact on future financial statements are set forth below in the prospective accounting changes section.
New accounting standards adopted during the year
The following new and amended standards, that have been issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), and are effective under those standards for the first time for the financial year beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and have also been endorsed by the EU, have been applied by the Group for the first time in the consolidated financial statements;
| IAS 1 (amendment 2011), Presentation of Items of financial statements. |
| IAS 19 (amendment 2011), Employee benefits. |
| IFRS 7 (amendment), Disclosures Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities |
| IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement. |
| Improvements to IFRSs. 2009-2011 Cycle. |
| IAS 27 (amended 2011), Separate financial statements. |
| IAS 28 (amended 2011), Associates and joint ventures. |
| IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements. |
F-8
| IFRS 11, Joint arrangements. |
| IFRS 12, Disclosure of interests in other entities. |
In addition the following amendment has been early adopted:
| IAS 36 (amendment), Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014). |
The adoption of these new or amended standards did not have a material impact on our financial position, results from operations, or disclosures in the year ended March 31, 2014.
Basis of preparation
These consolidated financial statements are presented in euro millions, the euro being the functional currency of the parent entity and the majority of the group companies. They are prepared on the historical cost basis, except for derivative financial instruments and available-for-sale securities which are stated at fair value, and share-based payments, which are based on fair value determined as at the grant date of the relevant share options. Certain non-current assets, when they are classified as held for sale, are stated at the lower of cost and fair value less costs to sell.
Critical accounting policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. These estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, and the results of such estimates form the basis of judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. These underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. A revision to an accounting estimate is recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if these are also affected. Principal sources of estimation uncertainty have been set forth in the critical accounting policies section below. Actual results may differ from estimates.
The Company believes that its critical accounting policies, which are those that require managements most difficult, subjective and complex judgements, are those described in this section. These critical accounting policies, the judgements and other uncertainties affecting application of these policies and the sensitivity of reported results to changes in conditions and assumptions are factors to be considered in reviewing the consolidated financial statements.
Long-lived assets
As of March 31, 2014, Ryanair had 5.1 billion of property, plant and equipment long-lived assets, virtually all of which consisted of aircraft. In accounting for long-lived assets, Ryanair must make estimates about the expected useful lives of the assets, the expected residual values of the assets and the potential for impairment based on the fair value of the assets and the cash flows they generate.
In estimating the lives and expected residual values of its aircraft, Ryanair has primarily relied on its own and industry experience, recommendations from Boeing, the manufacturer of all of the Companys aircraft, and other data available in the marketplace. Subsequent revisions to these estimates, which can be significant, could be caused by changes to Ryanairs maintenance programme, changes in utilisation of the aircraft, changes to governmental regulations on aging aircraft, and changing market prices for new and used aircraft of the same or similar types. Ryanair evaluates its estimates and assumptions in each reporting period, and, when warranted, adjusts these assumptions. Generally, these adjustments are accounted for on a prospective basis, through depreciation expense.
F-9
Ryanair periodically evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment. Factors that would indicate potential impairment would include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in the market value of an aircraft, a significant change in an aircrafts physical condition and operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the aircraft. While the airline industry as a whole has experienced many of these factors from time to time, Ryanair has not yet been seriously impacted and continues to record positive cash flows from these long-lived assets. Consequently, Ryanair has not yet identified any impairments related to its existing aircraft fleet. The Company will continue to monitor its long-lived assets and the general airline operating environment.
The Companys estimate of the recoverable amount of aircraft residual values is 15% of current market value of new aircraft, determined periodically, based on independent valuations and actual aircraft disposals during prior periods. Aircraft are depreciated over a useful life of 23 years from the date of manufacture to residual value.
Heavy maintenance
An element of the cost of an acquired aircraft is attributed, on acquisition, to its service potential, reflecting the maintenance condition of the engines and airframe.
For aircraft held under operating lease agreements, Ryanair is contractually committed to either return the aircraft in a certain condition or to compensate the lessor based on the actual condition of the airframe, engines and life-limited parts upon return. In order to fulfill such conditions of the lease, maintenance, in the form of major airframe overhaul, engine maintenance checks, and restitution of major life-limited parts, is required to be performed during the period of the lease and upon return of the aircraft to the lessor. The estimated airframe and engine maintenance costs and the costs associated with the restitution of major life-limited parts, are accrued and charged to profit or loss over the lease term for this contractual obligation, based on the present value of the estimated future cost of the major airframe overhaul, engine maintenance checks, and restitution of major life-limited parts, calculated by reference to the number of hours flown or cycles operated during the year.
Ryanairs aircraft operating lease agreements typically have a term of seven years, which closely correlates with the timing of heavy maintenance checks. The contractual obligation to maintain and replenish aircraft held under operating lease exists independently of any future actions within the control of Ryanair.
While Ryanair may, in very limited circumstances, sub-lease its aircraft, it remains fully liable to perform all of its contractual obligations under the head lease notwithstanding any such sub-leasing.
Both of these elements of accounting policies involve the use of estimates in determining the quantum of both the initial maintenance asset and/or the amount of provisions to be recorded and the respective periods over which such amounts are charged to income. In making such estimates, Ryanair has primarily relied on its own and industry experience, industry regulations and recommendations from Boeing; however, these estimates can be subject to revision, depending on a number of factors, such as the timing of the planned maintenance, the ultimate utilisation of the aircraft, changes to government regulations and increases or decreases in estimated costs. Ryanair evaluates its estimates and assumptions in each reporting period and, when warranted, adjusts its assumptions, which generally impact maintenance and depreciation expense in the income statement on a prospective basis.
Tax Audits
Income tax on the profit or loss for the year comprises current and deferred tax. Current tax payable on taxable profits is recognised as an expense in the period in which the profits arise using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is provided in full, using the balance sheet liability method on temporary differences arising from the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amount in the consolidated financial statements.
Social insurance, passenger taxes and sales taxes are recorded as a liability based on laws enacted in the jurisdictions to which they relate. Liabilities are recorded when an obligation has been incurred.
F-10
Ryanair reviews its tax obligations by jurisdiction regularly. There are many complexities and judgements in determining tax obligations due to the inherent complexity of tax law, the manner in which airline businesses are carried out whereby operations can begin and end in different jurisdictions and assumptions made about the timing and amount of individual balances to be included in financial statements and tax returns.
Ryanair has an internal tax group and takes professional advice on more complex matters in estimating its tax liabilities. Ryanair also deals extensively with revenue authorities in each jurisdiction in which it operates. Tax liabilities are based on the best estimate of the likely obligation at each reporting period. These estimates are subject to revision based on the outcome of tax audits and discussions with revenue authorities that can take several years to conclude.
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Ryanair Holdings plc and its subsidiary undertakings as of March 31, 2014. Subsidiaries are entities controlled by Ryanair. Control exists when Ryanair is exposed or has rights to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee.
All inter-company account balances and any unrealised income or expenses arising from intra-group transactions have been eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
The results of subsidiary undertakings acquired or disposed of in the period are included in the consolidated income statement from the date of acquisition or up to the date of disposal. Upon the acquisition of a business, fair values are attributed to the separable net assets acquired.
Foreign currency translation
Items included in the financial statements of each of the group entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the functional currency). The consolidated financial statements are presented in euro, which is the functional currency of the majority of the group entities.
Transactions arising in foreign currencies are translated into the respective functional currencies at the rates of exchange in effect at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are re-translated at the rate of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to euro at foreign exchange rates in effect at the dates the transactions were effected. Foreign currency differences arising on retranslation are recognised in profit or loss, except for differences arising on qualifying cash-flow hedges, which are recognised in other comprehensive income.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and provisions for impairments, if any. Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. Cost may also include transfers from other comprehensive income of any gain or loss on qualifying cash-flow hedges of foreign currency purchases of property, plant and equipment. Depreciation is calculated so as to write off the cost, less estimated residual value, of assets on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives at the following annual rates:
Rate of Depreciation | ||
Hangar and buildings |
5% | |
Plant and equipment (excluding aircraft) |
20-33.3% | |
Fixtures and fittings |
20% | |
Motor vehicles |
33.3% |
F-11
Aircraft are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives to estimated residual values. The estimates of useful lives and residual values at year-end are:
Aircraft Type |
Number of Owned Aircraft at March 31, 2014 |
Useful Life | Residual Value | |||
Boeing 737-800s |
246 (a) | 23 years from date of manufacture |
15% of current market value of new aircraft, determined periodically |
(a) | The Company operated 297 aircraft as of March 31, 2014, of which 51 were leased. |
The Companys estimate of the recoverable amount of aircraft residual values is 15% of current market value of new aircraft, determined periodically, based on independent valuations and actual aircraft disposals during prior periods.
An element of the cost of an acquired aircraft is attributed on acquisition to its service potential, reflecting the maintenance condition of its engines and airframe. This cost, which can equate to a substantial element of the total aircraft cost, is amortised over the shorter of the period to the next maintenance check (usually between 8 and 12 years for Boeing 737-800 aircraft) or the remaining life of the aircraft. The costs of subsequent major airframe and engine maintenance checks are capitalised and amortised over the shorter of the period to the next check or the remaining life of the aircraft.
Advance and option payments made in respect of aircraft purchase commitments and options to acquire aircraft are recorded at cost and separately disclosed within property, plant and equipment. On acquisition of the related aircraft, these payments are included as part of the cost of aircraft and are depreciated from that date.
Rotable spare parts held by the Company are classified as property, plant and equipment if they are expected to be used over more than one period.
Gains and losses on disposal of items of property, plant and equipment are determined by comparing the proceeds from disposal with the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, and are recognised on a net basis within other income/(expenses) in profit or loss.
Aircraft maintenance costs
The accounting for the cost of providing major airframe and certain engine maintenance checks for owned aircraft is described in the accounting policy for property, plant and equipment.
For aircraft held under operating lease agreements, Ryanair is contractually committed to either return the aircraft in a certain condition or to compensate the lessor based on the actual condition of the airframe, engines and life-limited parts upon return. In order to fulfill such conditions of the lease, maintenance, in the form of major airframe overhaul, engine maintenance checks, and restitution of major life-limited parts, is required to be performed during the period of the lease and upon return of the aircraft to the lessor. The estimated airframe and engine maintenance costs and the costs associated with the restitution of major life-limited parts, are accrued and charged to profit or loss over the lease term for this contractual obligation, based on the present value of the estimated future cost of the major airframe overhaul, engine maintenance checks, and restitution of major life-limited parts, calculated by reference to the number of hours flown or cycles operated during the year.
Ryanairs aircraft operating lease agreements typically have a term of seven years, which closely correlates with the timing of heavy maintenance checks. The contractual obligation to maintain and replenish aircraft held under operating lease exists independently of any future actions within the control of Ryanair. While Ryanair may, in very limited circumstances, sub-lease its aircraft, it remains fully liable to perform all of its contractual obligations under the head lease notwithstanding any such sub-leasing.
All other maintenance costs, other than major airframe overhaul, engine maintenance checks, and restitution of major life-limited parts costs associated with leased aircraft, are expensed as incurred.
F-12
Intangible assets - landing rights
Intangible assets acquired are recognised to the extent it is considered probable that expected future benefits will flow to the Company and the associated costs can be measured reliably. Landing rights acquired as part of a business combination are capitalised at fair value at that date and are not amortised, where those rights are considered to be indefinite. The carrying values of those rights are reviewed for impairment at each reporting date and are subject to impairment testing when events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying values may not be recoverable. No impairment to the carrying values of the Companys intangible assets has been recorded to date.
Available-for-sale securities
The Company holds certain equity securities, which are classified as available-for-sale, and are measured at fair value, less incremental direct costs, on initial recognition. Such securities are classified as available-for-sale, rather than as an investment in an associate if the Company does not have the power to exercise significant influence over the investee. Subsequent to initial recognition they are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses, are recognised in other comprehensive income and reflected in shareholders equity in the consolidated balance sheet. Fair value losses, subsequent to any impairments are recognised in other comprehensive income against net cumulative gains in the reserve. Fair value losses below the impaired value are recognised in the income statement. The fair values of available-for-sale securities are determined by reference to quoted prices in active markets at each reporting date. When an investment is de-recognised the cumulative gain or loss in other comprehensive income is transferred to the income statement.
Such securities are considered to be impaired if there is objective evidence which indicates that events have occurred that can reasonably be expected to adversely affect the future cash flows of the securities, such that the future cash flows do not support the current fair value of the securities. This includes where there is a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value below its cost. All impairment losses are recognised in the income statement and any cumulative loss in respect of an available-for-sale asset recognised previously in other comprehensive income is also transferred to the income statement.
Other financial assets
Other financial assets (other than available-for-sale financial assets) comprise cash deposits of greater than three months maturity. All amounts are categorised as loans and receivables and are carried initially at fair value and then subsequently at amortised cost, using the effective interest method in the balance sheet.
Derivative financial instruments
Ryanair is exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and currency exchange rates. The objective of financial risk management at Ryanair is to minimise the impact of commodity price, interest rate and foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the Companys earnings, cash flows and equity.
To manage these risks, Ryanair uses various derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, foreign currency forward contracts and commodity contracts. These derivative financial instruments are generally held to maturity. The Company enters into these arrangements with the goal of hedging its operational and balance sheet risk. However, Ryanairs exposure to commodity price, interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations cannot be neutralised completely.
Derivative financial instruments are recognised initially at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivative financial instruments continue to be re-measured to fair value, and changes therein are accounted for as described below.
The fair value of interest rate swaps is computed by discounting the projected cash flows on the Companys swap arrangements to present value using an appropriate market rate of interest. The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts and commodity contracts is determined based on the present value of the quoted forward price. Recognition of any resultant gain or loss depends on the nature of the item being hedged.
F-13
Where a derivative financial instrument is designated as a hedge of the variability in cash flows of a recognised asset or liability or a highly probable forecasted transaction, the effective part of any gain or loss on the derivative financial instrument is recognised in other comprehensive income (in the cash flow hedging reserve on the balance sheet). When the hedged forecasted transaction results in the recognition of a non-financial asset or liability, the cumulative gain or loss is removed from other comprehensive income and included in the initial measurement of that asset or liability. Otherwise the cumulative gain or loss is removed from other comprehensive income and recognised in the income statement at the same time as the hedged transaction. The ineffective part of any hedging transaction and the gain or loss thereon is recognised in the income statement immediately.
When a hedging instrument or hedge relationship is terminated but the underlying hedged transaction is still expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss at that point remains in other comprehensive income and is recognised in accordance with the above policy when the transaction occurs. If the hedged transaction is no longer expected to take place, the cumulative unrealised gain or loss recognised in other comprehensive income is recognised in the income statement immediately.
Where a derivative financial instrument hedges the changes in fair value of a recognised asset or liability or an unrecognised firm commitment, any gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognised in the income statement. The hedged item is also stated at fair value in respect of the risk being hedged, with any gain or loss also being recognised in the income statement.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is based on invoiced price on an average basis for all stock categories. Net realisable value is calculated as the estimated selling price arising in the ordinary course of business, net of estimated selling costs.
Trade and other receivables and payables
Trade and other receivables and payables are stated on initial recognition at fair value plus any incremental direct costs and subsequently at amortised cost, net (in the case of receivables) of any impairment losses, which approximates fair value given the short-dated nature of these assets and liabilities.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash represents cash held at banks and available on demand, and is categorised for measurement purposes as loans and receivables.
Cash equivalents are current asset investments (other than cash) that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash, typically cash deposits of more than one day but less than three months at the date of purchase. Deposits with maturities greater than three months are recognised as short-term investments, are categorised as loans and receivables and are carried initially at fair value and then subsequently at amortised cost, using the effective-interest method.
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
All loans and borrowings are initially recorded at fair value, being the fair value of the consideration received, net of attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, non-current interest-bearing loans are measured at amortised cost, using the effective interest yield methodology.
Leases
Leases under which the Company assumes substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Assets held under finance leases are capitalised in the balance sheet, at an amount equal to the lower of their fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments, and are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. The present values of the future lease payments are recorded as obligations under finance leases and the interest element of a lease obligation is charged to the income statement over the period of the lease in proportion to the balances outstanding.
F-14
Other leases are operating leases and the associated leased assets are not recognised on the Companys balance sheet. Expenditure arising under operating leases is charged to the income statement as incurred. The Company also enters into sale-and-leaseback transactions whereby it sells the rights to an aircraft to an external party and subsequently leases the aircraft back, by way of an operating lease. Any profit or loss on the disposal where the price achieved is not considered to be at fair value is spread over the period during which the asset is expected to be used. The profit or loss amount deferred is included within other creditors and divided into components of greater than and less than one year.
Provisions and contingencies
A provision is recognised in the balance sheet when there is a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefit will be required to settle the obligation. If the effect is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future outflow at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, when appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.
The Company assesses the likelihood of any adverse outcomes to contingencies, including legal matters, as well as probable losses. We record provisions for such contingencies when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. A contingent liability is disclosed where the existence of the obligation will only be confirmed by future events, or where the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with reasonable reliability. Provisions are re-measured at each balance sheet date based on the best estimate of the settlement amount.
In relation to legal matters, we develop estimates in consultation with internal and external legal counsel taking into account the relevant facts and circumstances known to us. The factors that we consider in developing our legal provisions include the merits and jurisdiction of the litigation, the nature and number of other similar current and past litigation cases, the nature of the subject matter of the litigation, the likelihood of settlement and current state of settlement discussions, if any.
Segment reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal organisational and management structure and the internal reporting information provided to the chief operating decision maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of operating segments. The Company is managed as a single business unit that provides low fares airline-related services, including scheduled services, and ancillary services including car hire services, and internet and other related services to third parties, across a European route network.
Income statement classification and presentation
Individual income statement captions have been presented on the face of the income statement, together with additional line items, headings and sub-totals, where it is determined that such presentation is relevant to an understanding of our financial performance, in accordance with IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements.
Expenses are classified and presented in accordance with the nature-of-expenses method. We disclose separately on the face of the income statement, within other income and expense, losses on the impairment of available-for-sale financial assets and gains or losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment. The nature of the Companys available-for-sale asset is that of a financial investment; accordingly any impairment of the investment is categorised as finance expense and included in other income/(expense) as a separate line item. The presentation of gains or losses on the disposal of property, plant and equipment within other income/(expense) accords with industry practice.
F-15
Revenues
Scheduled revenues comprise the invoiced value of airline and other services, net of government taxes. Revenue from the sale of flight seats is recognised in the period in which the service is provided. Unearned revenue represents flight seats sold but not yet flown and a provision for government tax refund claims attributable to unused tickets, and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities. Revenue, net of government taxes, is released to the income statement as passengers fly. Unused tickets are recognised as revenue on a systematic basis, such that twelve months of time expired revenues are recognised in revenue in each fiscal year. Miscellaneous fees charged for any changes to flight tickets are recognised in revenue immediately.
During the year ended March 31, 2012, changes in estimates relating to the timing of revenue recognition for unused passenger tickets were made, resulting in increased revenue of 65.3 million (fiscal year 2014:Nil, 2013:Nil). This change reflects more accurate and timely data obtained through system enhancements.
Ancillary revenues are recognised in the income statement in the period the ancillary services are provided.
Share-based payments
The Company engages in equity-settled, share-based payment transactions in respect of services received from certain of its employees. The fair value of the services received is measured by reference to the fair value of the share options on the date of the grant. The grant measurement date is the date that a shared understanding of the terms of the award is established between the Company and the employee. The cost of the employee services received in respect of the share options granted is recognised in the income statement over the period that the services are received, which is the vesting period, with a corresponding increase in equity. To the extent that service is provided prior to the grant measurement date, the fair value of the share options is initially estimated and re-measured at each balance sheet date until the grant measurement date is achieved. The fair value of the options granted is determined using a binomial lattice option-pricing model, which takes into account the exercise price of the option, the current share price, the risk-free interest rate, the expected volatility of the Ryanair Holdings plc share price over the life of the option and other relevant factors. Non-market vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of shares or share options included in the measurement of the cost of employee services so that ultimately, the amount recognised in the income statement reflects the number of vested shares or share options.
Pensions and other post-retirement obligations
The Company provides certain employees with post-retirement benefits in the form of pensions. The Company currently operates a number of defined contribution schemes and a small defined benefit pension scheme in the U.K.
Costs arising in respect of the Companys defined contribution pension schemes (where fixed contributions are paid into the scheme and there is no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts) are charged to the income statement in the period in which they are incurred. Any contributions unpaid at the balance sheet date are included as a liability.
A defined benefit plan is a post-employment benefit plan other than a defined-contribution plan. The liabilities and costs associated with the Companys defined benefit pension scheme are assessed on the basis of the projected unit credit method by professionally qualified actuaries and are arrived at using actuarial assumptions based on market expectations at the balance sheet date. The net obligation in respect of defined benefit schemes is calculated separately for each plan by estimating the amount of future benefits that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods. That benefit is discounted to determine its present value and the fair value of any plan asset is deducted. The discount rates employed in determining the present value of each schemes liabilities are determined by reference to market yields at the balance sheet date of high quality corporate bonds in the same currency and term that is consistent with those of the associated pension obligations. The net surplus or deficit arising on the Companys defined-benefit scheme is shown within non-current assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. The deferred tax impact of any such amount is disclosed separately within deferred tax.
F-16
Re-measurements, comprising actuarial gains and losses and the return on plan assets (excluding net interest), are recognised immediately in the balance sheet with a corresponding debit or credit to retained earnings through other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur.
Taxation
Income tax on the profit or loss for a year comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognised in the income statement except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive income (such as certain hedging derivative financial instruments, available-for-sale assets, pensions and other post-retirement obligations). Current tax payable on taxable profits is recognised as an expense in the period in which the profits arise using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the balance sheet liability method, on temporary differences arising from the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates and legislation enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date and expected to apply when the temporary differences reverse.
The following temporary differences are not provided for: (i) the initial recognition of assets and liabilities that effect neither accounting nor taxable profit and (ii) differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that it is probable they will not reverse in the future.
A deferred tax asset is recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which temporary differences can be utilised. The carrying amounts of deferred tax assets are reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that a sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be realised.
Social insurance, passenger taxes and sales taxes are recorded as a liability based on laws enacted in the jurisdictions to which they relate. Liabilities are recorded when an obligation has been incurred.
Tax liabilities are based on the best estimate of the likely obligation at each reporting period. These estimates are subject to revision based on the outcome of tax audits and discussions with revenue authorities that can take several years to conclude.
Share capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issuance of ordinary shares and share options are recognised as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects. When share capital recognised as equity is repurchased, the amount of consideration paid, which includes any directly attributable costs, net of any tax effects, is recognised as a deduction from equity. Repurchased shares are classified as treasury shares and are presented as a deduction from total equity, until they are cancelled.
Prospective accounting changes, new standards and interpretations not yet adopted
The following new or revised IFRS standards and IFRIC interpretations will be adopted from their effective dates for the purposes of the preparation of future financial statements, where applicable. We do not anticipate that the adoption of these new or revised standards and interpretations will have a material impact on our financial position or results from operations.
| IAS 32 (amendment), Financial instruments: Presentation-offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014).* |
| IAS 39 (amendment), Novation of Derivatives and Continuation of Hedge Accounting (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014).* |
| IAS 19 (amendment), Defined Benefit Plans: Employee Contributions (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after July 1, 2014). |
F-17
| IFRIC 21, Levies (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014).* |
| IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (2009, as amended in 2011 and 2013) (effective date to be determined). |
| Improvements to IFRSs. 2010-2012 Cycle (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after July 1, 2014). |
| Improvements to IFRSs. 2011-2013 Cycle (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after July 1, 2014). |
| IFRS 14, Regulators Deferral Accounts (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016). |
| Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 38: Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and Amortisation (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016). |
| Amendments to IFRS 11: Accounting for Acquisitions of Interests in Joint Operations (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016). |
| Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 41: Agriculture: Bearer Plants (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016). |
| IAS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2017). |
* | Adopted by the EU (IASB effective date in brackets). |
F-18
2 | Property, plant and equipment |
Aircraft | Hangar and Buildings |
Plant and Equipment |
Fixtures and Fittings |
Motor Vehicles |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
6,409.6 | 58.8 | 23.2 | 33.2 | 2.3 | 6,527.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Additions in year |
490.5 | 8.5 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 0.1 | 505.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals in year |
(84.4 | ) | | | | | (84.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
At March 31, 2014 |
6,815.7 | 67.3 | 26.6 | 36.5 | 2.4 | 6,948.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
1,555.1 | 15.7 | 19.3 | 28.6 | 2.1 | 1,620.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Charge for year |
343.9 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 0.1 | 351.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eliminated on disposal |
(84.4 | ) | | | | | (84.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
At March 31, 2014 |
1,814.6 | 18.3 | 21.5 | 31.6 | 2.2 | 1,888.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net book value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2014 |
5,001.1 | 49.0 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 0.2 | 5,060.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Aircraft | Hangar and Buildings |
Plant and Equipment |
Fixtures and Fittings |
Motor Vehicles |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
6,158.3 | 46.8 | 20.8 | 30.5 | 2.3 | 6,258.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Additions in year |
293.4 | 12.0 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 0.1 | 310.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals in year |
(42.1 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (42.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
6,409.6 | 58.8 | 23.2 | 33.2 | 2.3 | 6,527.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
1,275.9 | 13.4 | 17.1 | 25.0 | 2.1 | 1,333.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Charge for year |
321.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 3.7 | 0.1 | 329.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eliminated on disposal |
(42.1 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (42.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
1,555.1 | 15.7 | 19.3 | 28.6 | 2.1 | 1,620.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net book value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
4,854.5 | 43.1 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 0.2 | 4,906.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Aircraft | Hangar and Buildings |
Plant and Equipment |
Fixtures and Fittings |
Motor Vehicles |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2011 |
5,953.2 | 46.6 | 19.1 | 27.2 | 2.2 | 6,048.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Additions in year |
312.3 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 0.1 | 317.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals in year |
(107.2 | ) | | | | | (107.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
6,158.3 | 46.8 | 20.8 | 30.5 | 2.3 | 6,258.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2011 |
1,065.1 | 11.1 | 14.8 | 21.6 | 2.0 | 1,114.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Charge for year |
301.1 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 0.1 | 309.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eliminated on disposal |
(90.3 | ) | | | | | (90.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
1,275.9 | 13.4 | 17.1 | 25.0 | 2.1 | 1,333.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net book value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
4,882.4 | 33.4 | 3.7 | 5.5 | 0.2 | 4,925.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
At March 31, 2014, aircraft with a net book value of 4,471.1 million (2013: 4,663.0 million; 2012: 4,856.0 million) were mortgaged to lenders as security for loans. Under the security arrangements for the Companys new Boeing 737-800 next generation aircraft, the Company does not hold legal title to those aircraft while these loan amounts remain outstanding.
At March 31, 2014, the cost and net book value of aircraft included advance payments on aircraft of 282.1 million (2013: Nil; 2012: 110.5 million). Such amounts, where present, are not depreciated. The cost and net book value also includes capitalised aircraft maintenance, aircraft simulators and the stock of rotable spare parts.
The net book value of assets held under finance leases at March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was 559.0 million, 582.9 million, and 607.5 million respectively.
3 | Intangible assets |
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Landing rights |
46.8 | 46.8 | 46.8 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Landing slots were acquired with the acquisition of Buzz Stansted Limited in April 2003. As these landing slots have no expiry date and are expected to be used in perpetuity, they are considered to be of indefinite life and accordingly are not amortised. The Company also considers that there has been no impairment of the value of these rights to date. The recoverable amount of these rights has been determined on a value-in-use basis, using discounted cash-flow projections for a twenty-year period for each route that has an individual landing right. The calculation of value-in-use is most sensitive to the operating margin and discount rate assumptions. Operating margins are based on the existing margins generated from these routes and adjusted for any known trading conditions. The trading environment is subject to both regulatory and competitive pressures that can have a material effect on the operating performance of the business. Foreseeable events, however, are unlikely to result in a change of projections of a significant nature so as to result in the landing rights carrying amounts exceeding their recoverable amounts. These projections have been discounted based on the estimated discount rate applicable to the asset of 5.3% for 2014, 7.0% for 2013, and 7.7% for 2012.
4 | Available-for-sale financial assets |
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Investment in Aer Lingus |
260.3 | 221.2 | 149.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2014 Ryanairs total percentage shareholding in Aer Lingus was 29.8% (2013: 29.8%; 2012: 29.8%). The balance sheet value of 260.3 million (2013: 221.2 million; 2012: 149.7 million) reflects the market value of this investment as at March 31, 2014. In accordance with the Companys accounting policy, this asset is held at fair value with a corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income following initial acquisition. Any impairment losses that arise are recognised in the income statement and are not subsequently reversed. Any cumulative loss previously recognised in other comprehensive income is transferred to the income statement once an impairment is considered to have occurred.
The movement on the available for sale financial asset from 221.2 million at March 31, 2013 to 260.3 million at March 31, 2014 is comprised of a gain of 39.1 million, recognised through other comprehensive income, reflecting the increase in the share price of Aer Lingus from 1.39 per share at March 31, 2013 to approximately 1.64 per share at March 31, 2014.
F-20
This investment is classified as available-for-sale, rather than as an investment in an associate, because the Company does not have control or the power to exercise material influence over the entity. The Companys determination that it does not have control, or even exercise a significant influence over Aer Lingus through its minority shareholding has been based on the following factors, in particular:
| Ryanair does not have any representation on the Aer Lingus Board of Directors, nor does it have a right to appoint a director; |
| Ryanair does not participate in Aer Lingus policy-making decisions, nor does it have a right to participate in such policy-making decisions; |
| There are no material transactions between Ryanair and Aer Lingus, there is no interchange of personnel between the two companies and there is no sharing of technical information between the companies; |
| Aer Lingus and its significant shareholder (the Irish government: 25.1%) have openly opposed Ryanairs investment or participation in the company; |
| In August 2007, September 2007 and November/December 2011, Aer Lingus refused Ryanairs attempt to assert its statutory right to requisition a general meeting (a legal right of any 10% shareholder under Irish law); |
| On April 15, 2011, the High Court in Dublin ruled that Aer Lingus was not obliged to accede to Ryanairs request that two additional resolutions (on the payment of a dividend and on payments to pension schemes) be put to vote at Aer Lingus annual general meeting; |
| The European Commission has formally found that Ryanairs shareholding in Aer Lingus does not grant Ryanair de jure or de facto control of Aer Lingus and that Ryanairs rights as a minority shareholder are associated exclusively to rights related to the protection of minority shareholders (Commission Decision Case No. COMP/M.4439 dated October 11, 2007). The European Commissions finding has been confirmed by the European Unions General Court which issued a decision on July 6, 2010 that the European Commission was justified to use the required legal and factual standard in its refusal to order Ryanair to divest its minority shareholding in Aer Lingus and that, as part of that decision, Ryanairs shareholding did not confer control of Aer Lingus (Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) Case No. T-411/07 dated July 6, 2010); and |
| On February 27, 2013 the European Commission prohibited Ryanairs bid made on June 19, 2012, to acquire the entire share capital of Aer Lingus on the claimed basis that it would be incompatible with the EU internal market. Ryanair appealed this decision to the EU General Court on May 8, 2013. The judgment of the EU General Court is expected in 2015 and may affirm or annul the decision of the European Commission. |
Following the European Commissions decision to prohibit its offer for Aer Lingus, Ryanair actively engaged with the Competition Commissions investigation of the minority stake. On August 28, 2013, the UK Competition Commission (UKCC) issued its final decision in which it found that Ryanairs shareholding gave it the ability to exercise material influence over Aer Lingus and had led, or may be expected to lead, to a substantial lessening of competition in the markets for air passenger services between Great Britain and Ireland. As a result of its findings, the UKCC ordered Ryanair to reduce its shareholding in Aer Lingus to below 5 per cent of Aer Lingus issued ordinary shares. Ryanair appealed the UKCCs final decision to the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) on September 23, 2013. The CAT rejected Ryanairs appeal on March 7, 2014. On April 3, 2014, Ryanair applied for permission to appeal the CATs judgment to the UK Court of Appeal. Should Ryanairs permission to appeal, the appeal itself or any subsequent appeal to the UK Supreme Court be refused, Ryanair could suffer losses due to the negative impact on market prices of the forced sale of such a significant portion of Aer Lingus shares. Ryanair believes that the enforcement of any such decision should be delayed until the outcome of Ryanairs appeal against the European Commissions February 2013 prohibition decision of Ryanairs 2012 offer for Aer Lingus, and the conclusion of any appeals against the UKCCs decision in the UK courts. However, it is possible that the UKCC will seek to enforce any such sell-down remedy at an earlier date.
F-21
5 | Derivative financial instruments |
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has responsibility for monitoring the treasury policies and objectives of the Company, which include controls over the procedures used to manage the main financial risks arising from the Companys operations. Such risks comprise commodity price, foreign exchange and interest rate risks. The Company uses financial instruments to manage exposures arising from these risks. These instruments include borrowings, cash deposits and derivatives (principally jet fuel derivatives, interest rate swaps, cross-currency interest rate swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts). It is the Companys policy that no speculative trading in financial instruments takes place.
The Companys historical fuel risk management policy has been to hedge between 70% and 90% of the forecast rolling annual volumes required to ensure that the future cost per gallon of fuel is locked in. This policy was adopted to prevent the Company being exposed, in the short term, to adverse movements in global jet fuel prices. However, when deemed to be in the best interests of the Company, it may deviate from this policy. At March 31, 2014, the Company had hedged approximately 90% of its estimated fuel exposure for the year ending March 31, 2015. At March 31, 2013, the Company had hedged approximately 90% of its estimated fuel exposure for the year ending March 31, 2014. At March 31, 2012, the Company had hedged approximately 90% of its estimated fuel exposure for the year ending March 31, 2013.
Foreign currency risk in relation to the Companys trading operations largely arises in relation to non-euro currencies. These currencies are primarily U.K. pounds sterling and the U.S. dollar. The Company manages this risk by matching U.K. pounds sterling revenues against U.K. pounds sterling costs. Surplus U.K. pounds sterling revenues are sometimes used to fund forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge U.S. dollar currency exposures that arise in relation to fuel, maintenance, aviation insurance, and capital expenditure costs and excess U.K. pounds sterling are converted into euro. Additionally, the Company swaps euro for U.S. dollars using forward currency contracts to cover any expected U.S. dollar outflows for these costs. From time to time, the Company also swaps euro for U.K. pounds sterling using forward currency contracts to hedge expected future surplus U.K. pounds sterling. From time to time the Company also enters into cross-currency interest rate swaps to hedge against fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates in respect of U.S. dollar denominated borrowings.
The Companys objective for interest rate risk management is to reduce interest-rate risk through a combination of financial instruments, which lock in interest rates on debt and by matching a proportion of floating rate assets with floating rate liabilities. In addition, the Company aims to achieve the best available return on investments of surplus cash subject to credit risk and liquidity constraints. Credit risk is managed by limiting the aggregate amount and duration of exposure to any one counterparty based on third-party market-based ratings. In line with the above interest rate risk management strategy, the Company has entered into a series of interest rate swaps to hedge against fluctuations in interest rates for certain floating rate financial arrangements and certain other obligations. The Company has also entered into floating rate financing for certain aircraft, which is matched with floating rate deposits. Additionally, certain cash deposits have been set aside as collateral for the counterpartys exposure to risk of fluctuations on certain derivative and other financing arrangements with Ryanair (restricted cash). At March 31, 2014, such restricted cash amounted to 13.3 million (2013: 24.7 million; 2012: 35.1 million). Additional numerical information on these swaps and on other derivatives held by the Company is set out below and in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Company utilises a range of derivatives designed to mitigate these risks. All of the above derivatives have been accounted for at fair value in the Companys balance sheet and have been utilised to hedge against these particular risks arising in the normal course of the Companys business. All have been designated as hedging derivatives for the purposes of IAS 39 and are fully set out below.
F-22
Derivative financial instruments, all of which have been recognised at fair value in the Companys balance sheet, are analysed as follows:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||
Gains on cash-flow hedging instruments maturing within one year |
0.4 | 5.1 | 3.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
0.4 | 5.1 | 3.3 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||
Gains on cash flow hedging instruments maturing after one year |
16.7 | 78.1 | 231.9 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
16.7 | 78.1 | 231.9 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total derivative assets |
17.1 | 83.2 | 235.2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||
Losses on cash flow hedging instruments maturing within one year |
(95.4 | ) | (31.8 | ) | (28.2 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(95.4 | ) | (31.8 | ) | (28.2 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-current liabilities |
||||||||||||
Losses on cash flow hedging instruments maturing after one year |
(43.2 | ) | (50.1 | ) | (53.6 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(43.2 | ) | (50.1 | ) | (53.6 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total derivative liabilities |
(138.6 | ) | (81.9 | ) | (81.8 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net derivative financial instrument position at year-end |
(121.5 | ) | 1.3 | 153.4 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the above gains and losses were unrealised at the period-end.
The table above includes the following derivative arrangements:
Fair value 2014 |
Fair value 2013 |
Fair value 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Interest rate swaps (a) |
||||||||||||
Less than one year (b) |
(31.0 | ) | (31.8 | ) | (26.7 | ) | ||||||
Between one and five years |
(40.9 | ) | (49.9 | ) | (53.8 | ) | ||||||
After five years |
(0.5 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 0.2 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(72.4 | ) | (81.9 | ) | (80.3 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts (a) |
||||||||||||
Less than one year |
(64.4 | ) | 42.3 | 86.1 | ||||||||
Between one and five years |
(0.7 | ) | 5.1 | 3.0 | ||||||||
After five years |
(1.1 | ) | | 0.3 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(66.2 | ) | 47.4 | 89.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Commodity forward contracts (c) |
||||||||||||
Less than one year |
16.7 | 35.8 | 144.3 | |||||||||
Between one and five years |
0.4 | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
17.1 | 35.8 | 144.3 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net derivative position at year end |
(121.5 | ) | 1.3 | 153.4 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Additional information in relation to the above interest rate swaps and forward currency contracts (i.e. notional value and weighted average interest rates) can be found in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements. |
(b) | 31.0 million interest rate swap financial liabilities falling due within one year, includes 8.5 million derivative financial liabilities, falling due within one year, in respect of cross currency interest rate swaps (see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(c) | 17.1 million commodity forward contracts relate solely to jet fuel derivative financial assets (see Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements). |
F-23
Interest rate swaps are primarily used to convert a portion of the Companys floating rate exposures on borrowings and operating leases into fixed rate exposures and are set so as to match exactly the critical terms of the underlying debt or lease being hedged (i.e. notional principal, interest rate settings, re-pricing dates). These are all designated in cash-flow hedges of the forecasted variable interest payments and rentals due on the Companys underlying debt and operating leases and have been determined to be highly effective in achieving offsetting cash flows. Accordingly, no ineffectiveness has been recorded in the income statement relating to these hedges in the current and preceding years.
The Company also utilises cross currency interest rate swaps to manage exposures to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates of U.S. dollar denominated floating rate borrowings, together with managing the exposures to fluctuations in interest rates on these U.S. dollar denominated floating rate borrowings. Cross currency interest rate swaps are primarily used to convert a portion of the Companys U.S. dollar denominated debt to euro and floating rate interest exposures into fixed rate exposures and are set so as to match exactly the critical terms of the underlying debt being hedged (i.e. notional principal, interest rate settings, re-pricing dates). These are all designated in cash-flow hedges of the forecasted U.S. dollar variable interest payments on the Companys underlying debt and have been determined to be highly effective in achieving offsetting cash flows. Accordingly, no ineffectiveness has been recorded in the income statement relating to these hedges in the current year.
Foreign currency forward contracts may be utilised in a number of ways: forecast U.K. pounds sterling and euro revenue receipts are converted into U.S. dollars to hedge against forecasted U.S. dollar payments principally for jet fuel, insurance, capital expenditure and other aircraft related costs. These are designated in cash-flow hedges of forecasted U.S. dollar payments and have been determined to be highly effective in offsetting variability in future cash flows arising from the fluctuation in the U.S. dollar to U.K. pounds sterling and euro exchange rates for the forecasted U.S. dollar purchases. Because the timing of anticipated payments and the settlement of the related derivatives is very closely coordinated, no ineffectiveness has been recorded for these foreign currency forward contracts in the current or preceding years (the underlying hedged items and hedging instruments have been consistently closely matched).
The Company also utilises jet fuel forward contracts to manage exposure to jet fuel prices. These are used to hedge the Companys forecasted fuel purchases, and are arranged so as to match as closely as possible against forecasted fuel delivery and payment requirements. These are designated in cash-flow hedges of forecasted fuel payments and have been determined to be highly effective in offsetting variability in future cash flows arising from fluctuations in jet fuel prices. No ineffectiveness has been recorded on these arrangements in the current or preceding years.
The European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) began operating for airlines on January 1, 2012. In order to manage the risks associated with the fluctuation in the price of carbon emission credits, the Company entered into swap arrangements to fix the cost of a portion of its forecasted carbon emission credit purchases. The Company can forecast its requirement for carbon credits as they are directly linked to its consumption of jet fuel. These instruments have been designated in cash-flow hedges and no ineffectiveness has been recorded in the current year.
The (gains)/losses on the aircraft firm commitments are recognised as part of the capitalised cost of aircraft additions, within property, plant and equipment. The (gains)/losses on interest rate swaps, commodity forward contracts and forward currency contracts (excluding aircraft firm commitments) are recognised in the income statement when the hedged transaction occurs.
F-24
The following table indicates the amounts that were reclassified from other comprehensive income into the income statement, analysed by income statement category, in respect of cash-flow hedges realised during the year:
Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Commodity forward contracts |
||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments for losses/(gains) recognised in fuel and oil operating expenses, net of tax |
0.7 | (38.0 | ) | (284.2 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate swaps |
||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments for losses recognised in finance expense, net of tax |
24.0 | 25.9 | 22.7 | |||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments for (gains)/losses recognised in fuel and oil operating expenses, net of tax |
(0.3 | ) | (2.3 | ) | 6.5 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
24.4 | (14.4 | ) | (255.0 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table indicates the amounts that were reclassified from other comprehensive income into the capitalised cost of aircraft additions within property, plant and equipment, in respect of cash-flow hedges realised during the year:
Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
||||||||||||
Recognised in property plant and equipment aircraft additions |
(0.1 | ) | 4.7 | (11.1 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(0.1 | ) | 4.7 | (11.1 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables indicate the periods in which cash flows associated with derivatives that are designated as cash-flow hedges were expected to occur, as of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
Carrying Amount |
Expected Cash Flows |
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
(72.4 | ) | (51.0 | ) | (22.0 | ) | (17.6 | ) | (9.2 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||
U.S. dollar currency forward contracts |
(66.4 | ) | (66.7 | ) | (64.6 | ) | 0.3 | (0.4 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (1.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||
U.K. pounds sterling currency forward contracts |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity forward contracts |
17.1 | 17.1 | 16.7 | 0.4 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
(121.5 | ) | (100.4 | ) | (69.7 | ) | (16.9 | ) | (9.6 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (2.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying Amount |
Expected Cash Flows |
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
(81.9 | ) | (72.3 | ) | (27.1 | ) | (22.0 | ) | (14.6 | ) | (7.3 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
U.S. dollar currency forward contracts |
47.4 | 48.5 | 42.3 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity forward contracts |
35.8 | 35.8 | 35.8 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
1.3 | 12.0 | 51.0 | (20.4 | ) | (12.9 | ) | (5.5 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
Carrying Amount |
Expected Cash Flows |
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
(80.3 | ) | (70.5 | ) | (22.7 | ) | (23.7 | ) | (14.4 | ) | (7.4 | ) | (2.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
U.S. dollar currency forward contracts |
89.4 | 90.1 | 86.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity forward contracts |
144.3 | 144.3 | 144.3 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
153.4 | 163.9 | 207.6 | (22.8 | ) | (13.5 | ) | (6.5 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative transactions entered into by the Company with a particular counterparty are not settled net and there are no provisions within these agreements to off-set similar transactions.
The Company entered into a series of interest rate swaps to hedge against fluctuations in interest rates for certain floating rate financing of certain aircraft. Cash deposits are required to be set aside as collateral for certain historic interest rate swaps to mitigate the counterpartys exposure to fluctuations in the underlying interest rate swaps. The following table sets out the carrying amounts of recognised financial instruments that are subject to the above agreements:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Gross financial instruments in the statement of financial position |
||||||||||||
Derivative financial liabilities |
||||||||||||
- Interest rate swaps |
(11.0 | ) | (21.6 | ) | (32.1 | ) | ||||||
Related financial instruments that are not offset |
||||||||||||
- Restricted Cash |
13.3 | 24.7 | 35.1 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net amount |
2.3 | 3.1 | 3.0 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables indicate the periods in which cash flows associated with derivatives designated as cash-flow hedges were expected to impact profit or loss, as of March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
Carrying Amount |
Expected Cash flows |
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
(72.4 | ) | (51.0 | ) | (22.0 | ) | (17.6 | ) | (9.2 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||
U.S. dollar currency forward contracts |
(51.4 | ) | (51.7 | ) | (50.6 | ) | 1.3 | (0.4 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (1.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||
U.S. dollar currency forward contracts to be capitalised in property plant & equipment- aircraft additions |
(15.0 | ) | (15.0 | ) | (14.0 | ) | (1.0 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
U.K. pounds sterling currency forward contracts |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity forward contracts |
17.1 | 17.1 | 16.7 | 0.4 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
(121.5 | ) | (100.4 | ) | (69.7 | ) | (16.9 | ) | (9.6 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (2.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying Amount |
Expected Cash flows |
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
(81.9 | ) | (72.3 | ) | (27.1 | ) | (22.0 | ) | (14.6 | ) | (7.3 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
U.S. dollar currency forward contracts |
47.4 | 48.5 | 42.3 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity forward contracts |
35.8 | 35.8 | 35.8 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
1.3 | 12.0 | 51.0 | (20.4 | ) | (12.9 | ) | (5.5 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
Carrying Amount |
Expected Cash flows |
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
(80.3 | ) | (70.5 | ) | (22.7 | ) | (23.7 | ) | (14.4 | ) | (7.4 | ) | (2.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
U.S. dollar currency forward contracts |
82.5 | 83.2 | 79.1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. dollar currency forward contracts to be capitalised in property plant and equipment aircraft additions |
6.9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity forward contracts |
144.3 | 144.3 | 144.3 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
153.4 | 163.9 | 207.6 | (22.8 | ) | (13.5 | ) | (6.5 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 | Inventories |
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Consumables |
2.5 | 2.7 | 2.8 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the view of the directors, there are no material differences between the net realisable value of inventories and the balance sheet amounts.
7 | Other assets |
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Prepayments |
121.6 | 64.9 | 60.0 | |||||||||
Interest receivable |
2.6 | 2.8 | 4.9 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
124.2 | 67.7 | 64.9 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
All amounts fall due within one year.
8 | Trade receivables |
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Trade receivables |
58.2 | 56.2 | 51.6 | |||||||||
Allowance for impairment |
(0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
58.1 | 56.1 | 51.5 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
All amounts fall due within one year.
There has been no change to the allowance for impairment during the year (2013: Nil; 2012: Nil). There were no bad debt write-offs in the year (2013: Nil; 2012: Nil).
No individual customer accounted for more than 10% of our accounts receivable at March 31, 2014, at March 31, 2013 or at March 31, 2012.
At March 31, 2014, 1.4 million (2013: 1.1 million; 2012: 1.0 million) of our total accounts receivable balance were past due, of which 0.1 million (2013: 0.1 million; 2012: 0.1 million) was impaired and provided for and 1.3 million (2013: 1.0 million; 2012: 0.9 million) was considered past due but not impaired.
F-27
9 | Restricted cash |
Restricted cash consists of 13.3 million (2013: 24.7 million; 2012: 35.1 million) placed on deposit as collateral for certain derivative financial instruments and other financing arrangements entered into by the Company.
10 | Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Accruals |
397.8 | 431.6 | 327.0 | |||||||||
Taxation |
308.1 | 251.5 | 228.8 | |||||||||
Unearned revenue |
855.3 | 658.3 | 681.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
1,561.2 | 1,341.4 | 1,237.2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation comprises:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
PAYE (payroll taxes) |
6.7 | 5.2 | 5.1 | |||||||||
Other tax (principally air passenger duty in various countries) |
301.4 | 246.3 | 223.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
308.1 | 251.5 | 228.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 | Financial instruments and financial risk management |
The Company utilises financial instruments to reduce exposures to market risks throughout its business. Borrowings, cash and cash equivalents and liquid investments are used to finance the Companys operations. Derivative financial instruments are contractual agreements with a value that reflects price movements in an underlying asset. The Company uses derivative financial instruments, principally jet fuel derivatives, interest rate swaps, cross-currency interest rate swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts to manage commodity risks, interest rate risks and currency exposures and to achieve the desired profile of fixed and variable rate borrowings and leases in appropriate currencies. It is the Companys policy that no speculative trading in financial instruments shall take place.
The main risks attaching to the Companys financial instruments, the Companys strategy and approach to managing these risks, and the details of the derivatives employed to hedge against these risks have been disclosed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
F-28
(a) | Financial assets and financial liabilities fair values |
The carrying value and fair value of the Companys financial assets by class and measurement category at March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
Available For Sale |
Cash- Flow Hedges |
Loans and Receivables |
Total Carrying Value |
Total Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets |
260.3 | | | 260.3 | 260.3 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| | 1,730.1 | 1,730.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Financial asset: cash > 3 months |
| | 1,498.3 | 1,498.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
| | 13.3 | 13.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments:- |
||||||||||||||||||||
- Jet fuel derivative contracts |
| 17.1 | | 17.1 | 17.1 | |||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
| | 58.1 | 58.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| | 2.6 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total financial assets at March 31, 2014 |
260.3 | 17.1 | 3,302.4 | 3,579.8 | 277.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available For Sale |
Cash- Flow Hedges |
Loans and Receivables |
Total Carrying Value |
Total Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets |
221.2 | | | 221.2 | 221.2 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| | 1,240.9 | 1,240.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Financial asset: cash > 3 months |
| | 2,293.4 | 2,293.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
| | 24.7 | 24.7 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments:- |
||||||||||||||||||||
- U.S. dollar currency forward contracts |
| 47.4 | | 47.4 | 47.4 | |||||||||||||||
- Jet fuel derivative contracts |
| 35.0 | | 35.0 | 35.0 | |||||||||||||||
- Carbon derivative contracts |
| 0.8 | | 0.8 | 0.8 | |||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
| | 56.1 | 56.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| | 2.8 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total financial assets at March 31, 2013 |
221.2 | 83.2 | 3,617.9 | 3,922.3 | 304.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available For Sale |
Cash- Flow Hedges |
Loans and Receivables |
Total Carrying Value |
Total Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets |
149.7 | | | 149.7 | 149.7 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| | 2,708.3 | 2,708.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Financial asset: cash > 3 months |
| | 772.2 | 772.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
| | 35.1 | 35.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments:- |
||||||||||||||||||||
- U.S. dollar currency forward contracts |
| 89.4 | | 89.4 | 89.4 | |||||||||||||||
- Jet fuel derivative contracts |
| 145.8 | | 145.8 | 145.8 | |||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
| | 51.5 | 51.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| | 4.9 | 4.9 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total financial assets measured at March 31, 2012 |
149.7 | 235.2 | 3,572.0 | 3,956.9 | 384.9 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has not disclosed the fair value of the financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, financial assets: cash > 3 months, restricted cash, trade receivables and other assets because their carrying amounts are a reasonable approximation of their fair values due to the short term nature of the instruments.
F-29
The carrying values and fair values of the Companys financial liabilities by class and category were as follows:
Liabilities at Amortised Cost |
Cash-Flow Hedges |
Total Carrying Value |
Total Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||
At March 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||
Current and non-current maturities of debt |
3,083.6 | | 3,083.6 | 3,128.8 | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments:- |
||||||||||||||||
-Interest rate swaps |
| 72.4 | 72.4 | 72.4 | ||||||||||||
- Foreign exchange forward contracts |
| 66.2 | 66.2 | 66.2 | ||||||||||||
Trade payables |
150.0 | | 150.0 | |||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
397.8 | | 397.8 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total financial liabilities at March 31, 2014 |
3,631.4 | 138.6 | 3,770.0 | 3,267.4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||
Current and non-current maturities of debt |
3,498.3 | | 3,498.3 | 3,555.7 | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments:- |
||||||||||||||||
-Interest rate swaps |
| 81.9 | 81.9 | 81.9 | ||||||||||||
Trade payables |
138.3 | | 138.3 | |||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
431.6 | | 431.6 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total financial liabilities at March 31, 2013 |
4,068.2 | 81.9 | 4,150.1 | 3,637.6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||
Current and non-current maturities of debt |
3,625.2 | | 3,625.2 | 3,665.4 | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments:- |
||||||||||||||||
-Interest rate swaps |
| 80.3 | 80.3 | 80.3 | ||||||||||||
-Carbon swaps |
| 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
Trade payables |
181.2 | | 181.2 | |||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
327.0 | | 327.0 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total financial liabilities at March 31, 2012 |
4,133.4 | 81.8 | 4,215.2 | 3,747.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has not disclosed the fair value for financial liabilities such as trade payables and accrued expenses because their carrying amounts are a reasonable approximation of their fair values due to the short term nature of the instruments.
Estimation of fair values
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each material class of the Companys financial instruments:
Financial instruments measured at fair value
| Available-for-sale: The fair value of available-for-sale financial assets is their quoted market bid price at the balance sheet date. (Level 1) |
| Derivatives interest rate swaps: Discounted cash-flow analyses have been used to determine the fair value, taking into account current market inputs and rates. (Level 2) |
| Derivatives currency forwards, aircraft fuel contracts and carbon swaps: A comparison of the contracted rate to the market rate for contracts providing a similar risk profile at March 31, 2014 has been used to establish fair value. (Level 2) |
Financial instruments not measured at fair value
| Fixed-rate long-term debt: The repayments which Ryanair is committed to make have been discounted at the relevant market rates of interest applicable (including credit spreads) at the relevant reporting year end date to arrive at a fair value representing the amount payable to a third party to assume the obligations. |
There were no significant changes in the business or economic circumstances during the year to March 31, 2014 that affect the fair value of the Companys Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.
F-30
The table below analyses financial instruments carried at fair value in the balance sheet categorised by the type of valuation method used. The different valuation levels are defined as follows:
| Level 1: Inputs are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. |
| Level 2: Inputs are based on quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
| Level 3: Inputs for the asset or liability are not based on observable market data. |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||
At March 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets measured at fair value |
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale financial asset |
260.3 | | | 260.3 | ||||||||||||
Cash-flow hedges jet fuel derivative contracts |
| 17.1 | | 17.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
260.3 | 17.1 | | 277.4 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities measured at fair value |
||||||||||||||||
Cash-flow hedges interest rate swaps |
| 72.4 | | 72.4 | ||||||||||||
Cash-flow hedges Foreign exchange forward contracts |
| 66.2 | | 66.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 138.6 | | 138.6 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities not measured at fair value |
||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
| 3,128.8 | | 3,128.8 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 3,128.8 | | 3,128.8 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended March 31, 2014, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements, and no transfers into or out of Level 3 fair-value measurement.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets measured at fair value |
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale financial asset |
221.2 | | | 221.2 | ||||||||||||
Cash-flow hedges U.S. dollar currency forward contracts |
| 47.4 | | 47.4 | ||||||||||||
Cash-flow hedges jet fuel derivative contracts |
| 35.0 | | 35.0 | ||||||||||||
Cash-flow hedges carbon derivative contracts |
| 0.8 | | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
221.2 | 83.2 | | 304.4 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities measured at fair value |
||||||||||||||||
Cash-flow hedges interest rate swaps |
| (81.9 | ) | | (81.9 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (81.9 | ) | | (81.9 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended March 31, 2013, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements, and no transfers into or out of Level 3 fair-value measurement.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets measured at fair value |
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale financial asset |
149.7 | | | 149.7 | ||||||||||||
Cash-flow hedges U.S. dollar currency forward contracts |
| 89.4 | | 89.4 | ||||||||||||
Cash-flow hedges jet fuel derivative contracts |
| 145.8 | | 145.8 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
149.7 | 235.2 | | 384.9 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities measured at fair value |
||||||||||||||||
Cash-flow hedges interest rate swaps |
| (80.3 | ) | | (80.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash-flow hedges carbon swaps |
| (1.5 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (81.8 | ) | | (81.8 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended March 31, 2012, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, and no transfers into or out of Level 3 fair value measurement.
F-31
(b) | Commodity risk |
The Companys exposure to price risk in this regard is primarily for jet fuel used in the normal course of operations.
At the year-end, the Company had the following jet fuel and carbon arrangements in place:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Carbon swaps fair value |
| 0.8 | (1.5 | ) | ||||||||
Jet fuel forward contracts fair value |
17.1 | 35.0 | 145.8 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
17.1 | 35.8 | 144.3 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the above commodity contracts mature within the year and are matched against highly probable forecast commodity cash flows.
(c) | Maturity and interest rate risk profile of financial assets and financial liabilities |
At March 31, 2014, the Company had total borrowings of 3,083.6 million (2013: 3,498.3 million; 2012: 3,625.2 million) from various financial institutions, provided primarily on the basis of guarantees granted by the Export-Import Bank of the United States to finance the acquisition of 210 Boeing 737-800 next generation aircraft (2013: 210; 2012: 199). The guarantees are secured with a first fixed mortgage on the delivered aircraft. The remaining long-term debt relates to 30 aircraft held under finance leases (2013: 30; 2012: 30), 6 aircraft financed by way of other commercial debt (2013: 6; 2012: 6) and aircraft simulators.
The maturity profile of the Companys financial liabilities (excluding derivative financial liabilities, aircraft provisions, trade payables and accrued expenses) at March 31, 2014 was as follows:
Weighted average fixed rate (%) |
2015 M |
2016 M |
2017 M |
2018 M |
Thereafter M |
Total M |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured long term-debt |
2.93 | % | 90.9 | 93.9 | 97.1 | 96.1 | 257.7 | 635.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debt swapped from floating to fixed |
3.79 | % | 171.9 | 150.7 | 138.5 | 207.3 | 430.5 | 1,098.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Secured long-term debt after swaps |
3.30 | % | 262.8 | 244.6 | 235.6 | 303.4 | 688.2 | 1,734.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Finance leases |
2.81 | % | 41.6 | | 45.6 | 59.8 | 162.4 | 309.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total fixed rate debt |
304.4 | 244.6 | 281.2 | 363.2 | 850.6 | 2,044.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Floating rate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured long-term debt |
261.8 | 240.5 | 230.6 | 302.7 | 695.5 | 1,731.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt swapped from floating to fixed |
(171.9 | ) | (150.7 | ) | (138.5 | ) | (207.3 | ) | (430.5 | ) | (1,098.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Secured long-term debt after swaps |
0.74 | % | 89.9 | 89.8 | 92.1 | 95.4 | 265.0 | 632.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Finance leases |
1.48 | % | 73.6 | 49.7 | 66.9 | 70.7 | 146.5 | 407.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total floating rate debt |
1.03 | % | 163.5 | 139.5 | 159.0 | 166.1 | 411.5 | 1,039.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities |
467.9 | 384.1 | 440.2 | 529.3 | 1,262.1 | 3,083.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the above debt maturing after 2018 will mature between fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2025.
F-32
The maturity profile of the Companys financial liabilities (excluding derivative financial liabilities, aircraft provisions, trade payables and accrued expenses) at March 31, 2013 was as follows:
Weighted average fixed rate (%) |
2014 M |
2015 M |
2016 M |
2017 M |
Thereafter M |
Total M |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured long term-debt |
2.93 | % | 87.9 | 90.9 | 94.0 | 97.0 | 353.7 | 723.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debt swapped from floating to fixed |
3.88 | % | 171.4 | 174.1 | 152.9 | 140.9 | 654.0 | 1,293.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Secured long-term debt after swaps |
3.36 | % | 259.3 | 265.0 | 246.9 | 237.9 | 1,007.7 | 2,016.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Finance leases |
2.81 | % | | 40.7 | | | 261.1 | 301.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total fixed rate debt |
259.3 | 305.7 | 246.9 | 237.9 | 1,268.8 | 2,318.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Floating rate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured long-term debt |
258.6 | 264.0 | 242.7 | 233.0 | 1,013.9 | 2,012.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt swapped from floating to fixed |
(171.4 | ) | (174.1 | ) | (152.9 | ) | (140.9 | ) | (654.0 | ) | (1,293.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Secured long-term debt after swaps |
0.65 | % | 87.2 | 89.9 | 89.8 | 92.1 | 359.9 | 718.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Finance leases |
1.42 | % | 53.4 | 55.8 | 67.5 | 66.9 | 217.2 | 460.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total floating rate debt |
0.95 | % | 140.6 | 145.7 | 157.3 | 159.0 | 577.1 | 1,179.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities |
399.9 | 451.4 | 404.2 | 396.9 | 1,845.9 | 3,498.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the above debt maturing after 2017 will mature between fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2025.
The maturity profile of the Companys financial liabilities (excluding derivative financial liabilities, aircraft provisions, trade payables and accrued expenses) at March 31, 2012 was as follows:
Weighted average fixed rate (%) |
2013 M |
2014 M |
2015 M |
2016 M |
Thereafter M |
Total M |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured long term-debt |
2.94 | % | 78.9 | 81.8 | 84.7 | 87.5 | 392.8 | 725.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debt swapped from floating to fixed |
3.96 | % | 154.7 | 159.0 | 161.5 | 140.2 | 675.2 | 1,290.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Secured long-term debt after swaps |
3.59 | % | 233.6 | 240.8 | 246.2 | 227.7 | 1,068.0 | 2,016.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Finance leases |
2.81 | % | | | 39.8 | | 254.4 | 294.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total fixed rate debt |
233.6 | 240.8 | 286.0 | 227.7 | 1,322.4 | 2,310.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Floating rate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured long-term debt |
238.5 | 245.9 | 251.4 | 230.0 | 1,127.6 | 2,093.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt swapped from floating to fixed |
(154.7 | ) | (159.0 | ) | (161.5 | ) | (140.2 | ) | (675.2 | ) | (1,290.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Secured long-term debt after swaps |
1.47 | % | 83.8 | 86.9 | 89.9 | 89.8 | 452.4 | 802.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Finance leases |
2.43 | % | 51.0 | 53.4 | 55.8 | 67.5 | 284.2 | 511.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total floating rate debt |
1.85 | % | 134.8 | 140.3 | 145.7 | 157.3 | 736.6 | 1,314.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities |
368.4 | 381.1 | 431.7 | 385.0 | 2,059.0 | 3,625.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the above debt maturing after 2016 will mature between fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2024.
F-33
The following provides an analysis of changes in borrowings during the year:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Balance at start of year |
3,498.3 | 3,625.2 | 3,649.4 | |||||||||
Loans raised to finance aircraft acquisitions denominated in euro |
| 82.8 | 292.3 | |||||||||
Loans raised to finance aircraft acquisitions denominated in U.S. dollars |
| 151.8 | | |||||||||
Repayments of amounts borrowed |
(390.8 | ) | (366.4 | ) | (329.7 | ) | ||||||
Foreign exchange gain/(loss) on conversion of U.S. dollar loans |
(23.9 | ) | 4.9 | 13.2 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at end of year |
3,083.6 | 3,498.3 | 3,625.2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Less than one year |
467.9 | 399.9 | 368.4 | |||||||||
More than one year |
2,615.7 | 3,098.4 | 3,256.8 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
3,083.6 | 3,498.3 | 3,625.2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maturities of the contractual undiscounted cash flows (including estimated future interest payments on debt) of the Companys financial liabilities are as follows:
Total Carrying Value |
Total Contractual Cash flows |
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long term debt and finance leases:- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Fixed rate debt (excluding Swapped debt) |
945.1 | 1,020.7 | 148.7 | 108.2 | 154.9 | 165.8 | 443.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Swapped to fixed rate debt |
1,098.9 | 1,109.7 | 178.4 | 153.9 | 139.5 | 207.3 | 430.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
- Fixed rate debt |
3.23 | % | 2,044.0 | 2,130.4 | 327.1 | 262.1 | 294.4 | 373.1 | 873.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- Floating rate debt |
1.03 | % | 1,039.6 | 1,088.6 | 175.0 | 148.9 | 167.1 | 172.8 | 424.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
3,083.6 | 3,219.0 | 502.1 | 411.0 | 461.5 | 545.9 | 1,298.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Interest rate swaps |
72.4 | 51.0 | 22.0 | 17.6 | 9.2 | 1.6 | 0.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
- U.S dollar currency forward |
66.4 | 66.7 | 64.6 | (0.3 | ) | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
150.0 | 150.0 | 150.0 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
397.8 | 397.8 | 397.8 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total at March 31, 2014 |
3,770.2 | 3,884.5 | 1,136.5 | 428.3 | 471.1 | 547.8 | 1,300.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total Carrying Value |
Total Contractual Cash flows |
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long term debt and finance leases:- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Fixed rate debt (excluding Swapped debt) |
1,025.3 | 1,131.3 | 105.9 | 107.1 | 148.9 | 109.3 | 660.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Swapped to fixed rate debt |
1,293.3 | 1,329.2 | 182.1 | 180.6 | 156.2 | 141.8 | 668.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
- Fixed rate debt |
3.29 | % | 2,318.6 | 2,460.5 | 288.0 | 287.7 | 305.1 | 251.1 | 1,328.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- Floating rate debt |
0.95 | % | 1,179.7 | 1,226.3 | 154.8 | 156.7 | 166.1 | 166.6 | 582.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
3,498.3 | 3,686.8 | 442.8 | 444.4 | 471.2 | 417.7 | 1,910.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments:- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Interest rate swaps |
81.9 | 72.3 | 27.1 | 22.0 | 14.6 | 7.3 | 1.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
138.3 | 138.3 | 138.3 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
431.6 | 431.6 | 431.6 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total at March 31, 2013 |
4,150.1 | 4,329.0 | 1,039.8 | 466.4 | 485.8 | 425.0 | 1,912.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
Total Carrying Value |
Total Contractual Cash flows |
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long term debt and finance leases:- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Fixed rate debt (excluding Swapped debt) |
1,019.9 | 1,133.9 | 98.9 | 99.9 | 140.7 | 101.8 | 692.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Swapped to fixed rate debt |
1,290.6 | 1,329.4 | 170.2 | 170.6 | 168.7 | 143.7 | 676.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
- Fixed rate debt |
3.49 | % | 2,310.5 | 2,463.3 | 269.1 | 270.5 | 309.4 | 245.5 | 1,368.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- Floating rate debt |
1.85 | % | 1,314.7 | 1,436.9 | 158.3 | 161.3 | 164.4 | 173.3 | 779.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
3,625.2 | 3,900.2 | 427.4 | 431.8 | 473.8 | 418.8 | 2,148.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments:- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Interest rate swaps |
80.3 | 70.5 | 22.7 | 23.7 | 14.4 | 7.4 | 2.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Carbon swaps |
1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
181.2 | 181.2 | 181.2 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
327.0 | 327.0 | 327.0 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total at March 31, 2012 |
4,215.2 | 4,480.4 | 959.8 | 455.5 | 488.2 | 426.2 | 2,150.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate re-pricing
Floating interest rates on financial liabilities are generally referenced to European inter-bank interest rates (EURIBOR). Secured long-term debt and interest rate swaps typically re-price on a quarterly basis with finance leases re-pricing on a semi-annual basis. We use current interest rate settings on existing floating rate debt at each year-end to calculate contractual cash flows.
Fixed interest rates on financial liabilities are fixed for the duration of the underlying structures (typically between 10 and 12 years).
The Company holds significant cash balances that are invested on a short-term basis. At March 31, 2014, all of the Companys cash and liquid resources had a maturity of one year or less and attracted a weighted average interest rate of 0.37% (2013: 0.39%; 2012: 1.07%).
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets | Within 1 year |
Total | Within 1 year |
Total | Within 1 year |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
1,730.1 | 1,730.1 | 1,240.9 | 1,240.9 | 2,708.3 | 2,708.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash > 3 months |
1,498.3 | 1,498.3 | 2,293.4 | 2,293.4 | 772.2 | 772.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
13.3 | 13.3 | 24.7 | 24.7 | 35.1 | 35.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total financial assets |
3,241.7 | 3,241.7 | 3,559.0 | 3,559.0 | 3,515.6 | 3,515.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates on cash and liquid resources are generally based on the appropriate EURIBOR, LIBOR or bank rates dependant on the principal amounts on deposit.
(d) | Foreign currency risk |
The Company has exposure to various foreign currencies (principally U.K. pounds sterling and U.S. dollars) due to the international nature of its operations. The Company manages this risk by matching U.K. pound sterling revenues against U.K. pound sterling costs. Any remaining unmatched U.K. pound sterling revenues are used to fund U.S. dollar currency exposures that arise in relation to fuel, maintenance, aviation insurance and capital expenditure costs or are sold for euro. The Company also sells euro forward to cover certain U.S. dollar costs. Further details of the hedging activity carried out by the Company are disclosed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
F-35
The following table shows the net amount of monetary assets of the Company that are not denominated in euro at March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Such amounts have been translated using the following year-end foreign currency rates in 2014: /£: 0.8282; /$: 1.3788 (2013: /£: 0.8456; /$: 1.2805; 2012: /£: 0.8339; /$: 1.3356).
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GBP | U.S.$ | euro equiv. |
GBP | U.S.$ | euro equiv. |
GBP | U.S.$ | euro equiv. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£M | $M | M | £M | $M | M | £M | $M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monetary assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.K. pounds sterling cash and liquid resources |
79.0 | | 95.4 | 73.6 | | 87.1 | 38.9 | | 46.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Dollar cash and liquid resources |
| 9.3 | 6.7 | | 206.9 | 161.6 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
79.0 | 9.3 | 102.1 | 73.6 | 206.9 | 248.7 | 38.9 | | 46.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the net amount of monetary liabilities of the Company that are not denominated in euro at March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Such amounts have been translated using the following year-end foreign currency rates in 2014: /$: 1.3788.
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.$ | euro equiv. |
U.S.$ | euro equiv. |
U.S.$ | euro equiv. |
|||||||||||||||||||
$M | M | $M | M | $M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
Monetary liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S dollar long term debt |
411.1 | 298.1 | 450.0 | 351.4 | 282.8 | 211.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
411.1 | 298.1 | 450.0 | 351.4 | 282.8 | 211.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has entered into cross currency interest rate swap arrangements to manage exposures to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on these U.S. dollar denominated floating rate borrowings, together with managing the exposures to fluctuations in interest rates on these U.S. dollar denominated floating rate borrowings. The fair value of these cross currency interest rate swap instruments at March 31, 2014 was 8.5 million, (2013: 5.2 million; 2012: 7.4 million) which has been classified within current liabilities, specifically derivative liabilities falling due within one year (see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements).
The following table gives details of the notional amounts of the Companys currency forward contracts as at March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency forward contracts | U.S.$ | euro equiv. |
U.S.$ | euro equiv. |
U.S.$ | euro equiv. |
||||||||||||||||||
$M | M | $M | M | $M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. dollar currency forward contracts |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
- for fuel and other purchases |
3,216.4 | 2,385.9 | 2,417.8 | 1,836.2 | 2,657.0 | 1,907.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
- for aircraft purchases |
919.3 | 683.2 | | | 191.7 | 136.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
4,135.7 | 3,069.1 | 2,417.8 | 1,836.2 | 2,848.7 | 2,044.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency forward contracts | Stg £ | euro equiv. |
Stg £ | euro equiv. |
Stg £ | euro equiv. |
||||||||||||||||||
£M | M | £M | M | £M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
U.K pounds sterling currency forward contracts |
22.5 | 27.4 | | | 10.0 | 12.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
22.5 | 27.4 | | | 10.0 | 12.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
(e) | Equity risk |
The Company has exposure to equity price risk primarily in relation to its 29.8% investment in Aer Lingus. The Company does not have significant influence over Aer Lingus and accordingly, this investment is classified as an available-for-sale financial asset rather than an investment in an associate. Additional information in relation to the available-for-sale financial asset can be found in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
(f) | Credit risk |
The Company holds significant cash balances, which are invested on a short-term basis and are classified as either cash equivalents or liquid investments. These deposits and other financial instruments (principally certain derivatives and loans as identified above) give rise to credit risk on amounts due from counterparties. Credit risk is managed by limiting the aggregate amount and duration of exposure to any one counterparty through regular review of counterparties market-based ratings, Tier 1 capital level and credit default swap rates and by taking into account bank counterparties systemic importance to the financial systems of their home countries. The Company typically enters into deposits and derivative contracts with parties that have a long term Standard and Poors A category rating or equivalent credit rating. The maximum exposure arising in the event of default on the part of the counterparty is the carrying value of the relevant financial instrument. The Company is authorised to place funds on deposit for periods up to 18 months. The Board of Directors monitors the return on capital as well as the level of dividends to ordinary shareholders on an ongoing basis.
The Companys revenues derive principally from airline travel on scheduled services, internet income and in-flight and related sales. Revenue is primarily derived from European routes. No individual customer accounts for a significant portion of total revenue.
At March 31, 2014, 1.4 million (2013: 1.1 million; 2012: 1.0 million) of our total accounts receivable balance were past due, of which 0.1 million (2013: 0.1 million; 2012: 0.1 million) was impaired and provided for and 1.3 million (2013: 1.0 million; 2012: 0.9 million) was past due but not impaired. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.
(g) | Liquidity and capital management |
The Companys cash and liquid resources comprise cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash. The Company defines the capital that it manages as the Companys long-term debt and equity. The Companys policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to maintain sufficient financial resources to mitigate against risks and unforeseen events.
The Company finances its working capital requirements through a combination of cash generated from operations, bank loans and debt capital market issuances for the acquisition of aircraft. The Company had cash and liquid resources at March 31, 2014 of 3,241.7 million (2013: 3,559.0 million; 2012: 3,515.6 million). During the year, the Company funded 505.8 million in purchases of property, plant and equipment (2013: 310.7 million; 2012: 317.6 million). Cash generated from operations has been the principal source for these cash requirements, supplemented primarily by aircraft-related financing structures.
The Board of Directors periodically reviews the capital structure of the Company, considering the cost of capital and the risks associated with each class of capital. The Board approves any material adjustments to the capital structure in terms of the relative proportions of debt and equity.
Ryanair has generally been able to generate sufficient funds from operations to meet its non-aircraft acquisition-related working capital requirements. Management believes that the working capital available to the Company is sufficient for its present requirements and will be sufficient to meet its anticipated requirements for capital expenditures and other cash requirements for the 2014 fiscal year.
(h) | Guarantees |
Details of the Companys guarantees and the related accounting have been disclosed in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements.
F-37
(i) | Sensitivity analysis |
(i) Interest rate risk: Based on the levels of and composition of year-end interest bearing assets and liabilities, including derivatives, at March 31, 2014, a plus or minus one-percentage-point movement in interest rates would result in a respective increase or decrease of 18.0 million (net of tax) in net interest income and expense in the income statement (2013: 18.3 million; 2012: 18.3 million) and 16.7 million in equity (2013: 28.8 million: 2012: 36.9 million). All of the Groups interest rate swaps are used to swap variable rate debt to fixed rate debt; consequently any changes in interest rates would have an equal and opposite income statement effect for both the interest rate swaps and the debt.
(ii) Foreign currency risk: A plus or minus change of 10% in relevant foreign currency exchange rates, based on outstanding foreign currency-denominated financial assets and financial liabilities at March 31, 2014 would have a respective positive or negative impact on the income statement of 3.0 million (net of tax) (2013: 2.6 million; 2012: 1.8 million) and on equity of 288.2 million (net of tax) (2013: 183.1 million; 2012: 176.3 million).
(iii) Equity price risk: An increase/decrease of 10% in the Aer Lingus share price as of March 31, 2014 would result in an increase/decrease of 26.0 million in the fair value of the available-for-sale financial assets (2013: 22.1 million; 2012: 15.0 million). The increase/decrease would be recognised in other comprehensive income.
12 | Deferred and current taxation |
The components of the deferred and current taxation in the balance sheet are as follows:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Current tax (assets)/liabilities |
||||||||||||
Corporation tax (prepayment)/provision |
(1.1 | ) | 0.3 | (9.3 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total current tax (assets)/liabilities |
(1.1 | ) | 0.3 | (9.3 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
||||||||||||
Origination and reversal of temporary differences on property, plant and equipment, derivatives, pensions and available-for-sale securities |
368.6 | 346.5 | 324.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
368.6 | 346.5 | 324.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Deferred tax (assets) |
||||||||||||
Net operating losses |
| | (5.0 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
| | (5.0 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities (net) |
368.6 | 346.5 | 319.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total tax liabilities (net) |
367.5 | 346.8 | 310.1 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Reconciliation of current tax |
||||||||||||
At beginning of year |
0.3 | (9.3 | ) | (0.5 | ) | |||||||
Corporation tax charge in year |
31.1 | 34.1 | 4.9 | |||||||||
Adjustment in respect of prior-year under/(over) provision |
| 1.3 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||
Tax paid |
(32.5 | ) | (25.8 | ) | (13.6 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
At end of year |
(1.1 | ) | 0.3 | (9.3 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Reconciliation of deferred tax |
||||||||||||
At beginning of year |
346.5 | 319.4 | 267.7 | |||||||||
Release of deferred tax asset for prior-year net operating losses |
| 5.0 | 26.4 | |||||||||
New temporary differences on property, plant and equipment, derivatives, pensions and other items |
22.1 | 22.1 | 25.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
At end of year |
368.6 | 346.5 | 319.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The charge in the year to March 31, 2014 consisted of temporary differences of a charge of 37.5 million for property, plant and equipment recognised in the income statement and a credit of 15.2 million for derivatives and a credit of 0.2 million for pensions, all recognised in other comprehensive income. The charge in the year to March 31, 2013 consisted of temporary differences of a charge of 41.3 million for property, plant and equipment recognised in the income statement, a credit of 19.0 million for derivatives and a credit of 0.2 million for pensions, all recognised in other comprehensive income. New temporary differences arising in the year to March 31, 2012 consisted of temporary differences of a charge of 41.4 million for property, plant and equipment recognised in the income statement, a credit of 15.2 million for derivatives and a credit of 0.9 million for pensions, all recognised in other comprehensive income.
The components of the tax expense in the income statement were as follows:
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Corporation tax charge in year |
31.1 | 35.4 | 4.9 | |||||||||
Deferred tax charge relating to origination and reversal of temporary differences |
37.5 | 46.2 | 67.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
68.6 | 81.6 | 72.6 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles the statutory rate of Irish corporation tax to the Companys effective corporation tax rate:
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
% | % | % | ||||||||||
Statutory rate of Irish corporation tax |
12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |||||||||
Adjustments for earnings taxed at higher rates |
| 0.1 | 0.2 | |||||||||
Adjustments for earnings taxed at lower rates |
(0.5 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||||
Other differences |
(0.4 | ) | 0.6 | (0.1 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total effective rate of taxation |
11.6 | 12.5 | 11.5 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax applicable to items charged or credited to other comprehensive income were as follows:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Defined benefit pension obligations |
(0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
(15.2 | ) | (19.0 | ) | (15.2 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total tax charge in other comprehensive income |
(15.4 | ) | (19.2 | ) | (16.1 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
The majority of current and deferred tax recorded in each of fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 relates to domestic tax charges and there is no expiry date associated with these temporary differences. In fiscal 2014, the Irish corporation tax rate remained at 12.5%.
The principal components of deferred tax at each year-end were:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Arising on capital allowances and other temporary differences |
385.7 | 348.2 | 306.9 | |||||||||
Arising on net operating losses carried forward |
| | (5.0 | ) | ||||||||
Arising on derivatives |
(16.9 | ) | | 19.0 | ||||||||
Arising on pension |
(0.2 | ) | (1.7 | ) | (1.5 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
368.6 | 346.5 | 319.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognised all required deferred tax assets and liabilities. No deferred tax has been provided for on the un-remitted earnings of overseas subsidiaries because there is no intention to remit these to Ireland.
13 | Provisions |
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Provision for aircraft maintenance on operating leased aircraft (a) |
132.2 | 122.4 | 91.3 | |||||||||
Provision for pension obligation (b) |
1.7 | 13.5 | 11.9 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
133.9 | 135.9 | 103.2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
(a) Provision for aircraft maintenance on operating leased aircraft |
||||||||||||
At beginning of year |
122.4 | 91.3 | 84.7 | |||||||||
Increase in provision during the year |
38.0 | 41.9 | 33.1 | |||||||||
Utilisation of provision upon the hand-back of aircraft |
(28.2 | ) | (10.8 | ) | (26.5 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
At end of year |
132.2 | 122.4 | 91.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the 2014 fiscal year, the Company returned 8 aircraft held under operating lease to the lessors.
The expected timing of the outflows of economic benefits associated with the provision at March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
Carrying Value |
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for leased aircraft maintenance |
132.2 | 1.4 | 49.0 | 44.5 | 22.2 | 15.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Carrying Value |
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for leased aircraft maintenance |
122.4 | 52.0 | 10.4 | 20.7 | 23.3 | 16.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Carrying Value |
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for leased aircraft maintenance |
91.3 | 4.3 | 44.3 | 8.0 | 14.9 | 19.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
b) Provision for pension obligation |
||||||||||||
At beginning of year |
13.5 | 11.9 | 4.9 | |||||||||
Settlement on closure of Irish defined benefit plan |
(12.5 | ) | | | ||||||||
Movement during the year |
0.7 | 1.6 | 7.0 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
At end of year |
1.7 | 13.5 | 11.9 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for further details.
14 | Other creditors |
This consists of deferred gains arising from the sale and leaseback of aircraft. During fiscal year 2014, Ryanair returned 8 sale-and-leaseback aircraft but did not enter into sale-and-leaseback arrangements for any new Boeing 737-800 next generation aircraft (2013: 4; 2012: 11). Total sale-and-leaseback aircraft at March 31, 2014 was 51.
15 | Issued share capital, share premium account and share options |
(a) | Share capital |
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Authorised: |
||||||||||||
1,680,000,000 ordinary equity shares of 0.635 euro cent each 0 |
10.7 | 10.7 | 10.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Allotted, called-up and fully paid: |
||||||||||||
1,383,237,668 ordinary equity shares of 0.635 euro cent each |
8.8 | | | |||||||||
1,447,051,752 ordinary equity shares of 0.635 euro cent each |
| 9.2 | | |||||||||
1,455,593,261 ordinary equity shares of 0.635 euro cent each |
| | 9.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The movement in the share capital balance year-on-year principally relates to 5.7 million (2013: 6.5 million; 2012: 2.5 million) new shares issued due to the exercise of share options, less the cancellation of 69.5 million shares relating to share buy-backs (2013: 15.0 million; 2012: 36.5 million).
The share capital of Ryanair consists of one class of stock, the ordinary equity shares. The ordinary equity shares do not confer on the holders thereof the specific right to be paid a dividend out of profits.
(b) | Share premium account |
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
687.8 | 666.4 | 659.3 | |||||||||
Share premium arising from the exercise of 5.7 million options in fiscal 2014, 6.5 million options in fiscal 2013 and 2.5 million options in fiscal 2012 |
16.4 | 21.4 | 7.1 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at end of year |
704.2 | 687.8 | 666.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
(c) | Share options and share purchase arrangements |
The Company has adopted a number of share option plans, which allow current or future employees or executive directors to purchase shares in the Company up to an aggregate of approximately 5% (when aggregated with other ordinary shares over which options are granted and which have not yet been exercised) of the outstanding ordinary shares of Ryanair Holdings plc, subject to certain conditions. All grants are subject to approval by the Remuneration Committee. These are exercisable at a price equal to the market price of the ordinary shares at the time options are granted. The key terms of these option plans include the requirement that certain employees remain in employment with the Company for a specified period of time and that the Company achieves certain net profit targets and/or share price targets. These share options schemes are cash settled.
Details of the share options outstanding are set out below:
Share Options M |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
23.4 | | 3.07 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Exercised |
(2.5 | ) | | 2.81 | ||||
Expired |
(0.8 | ) | | 3.40 | ||||
Forfeited |
(2.1 | ) | | 3.08 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2012 |
18.0 | | 3.11 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Exercised |
(6.5 | ) | | 3.32 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2013 |
11.5 | | 2.97 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Exercised |
(5.7 | ) | | 2.90 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2014 |
5.8 | | 3.04 | |||||
|
|
|
|
The mid-market price of Ryanair Holdings plcs ordinary shares on the Irish Stock Exchange at March 31, 2014 was 7.61 (2013: 5.95; 2012: 4.48). The highest and lowest prices at which the Companys shares traded on the Irish Stock Exchange in the 2014 fiscal year were 7.70 and 5.33, respectively (2013: 6.16 and 3.83, respectively; 2012: 4.48 and 2.82, respectively). There were 5.8 million options exercisable at March 31, 2014 (2013: 2.1 million; 2012: 6.2 million). The average share price for the year was 6.59 (2013: 4.65; 2012: 3.58).
The weighted average share price (as of the dates of exercises) for all options exercised during the 2014 fiscal year was 6.67 (2013: 4.94; 2012: 3.69).
At March 31, 2014 the range of exercise prices and weighted average remaining contractual life of outstanding and exercisable options was as follows:
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Range of exercise |
Number outstanding M |
Weighted- average remaining contractual life (years) |
Weighted- average exercise price () |
Number exercisable M |
Weighted- average remaining contractual life (years) |
Weighted- average exercise price () |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.59-4.99 | 5.8 | 1.24 | 3.04 | 5.8 | 1.24 | 3.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has accounted for its share option grants to employees at fair value, in accordance with IFRS 2, using a binomial lattice model to value the option grants. This has resulted in a charge of 1.9 million to the income statement (2013: 1.9 million charge; 2012: 0.7 million credit) being recognised within the income statement in accordance with employee services rendered.
F-42
16 | Other equity reserve |
The total share based payments reserve at March 31, 2014 was 9.1 million (2013: 14.2 million; 2012: 21.6 million). The available-for-sale financial asset reserve at March 31, 2014 was 180.6 million (2013: 141.5 million; 2012: 70.0 million). The total cash-flow hedge reserve amounted to negative 83.2 million at March 31, 2014 (2013: 0.5 million; 2012: 138.6 million). Further details of the groups derivatives are set out in Notes 5 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
17 | Analysis of operating revenues and segmental analysis |
The Company is managed as a single business unit that provides low fares airline-related services, including scheduled services, internet and other related services to third parties across a European route network. The Company operates a single fleet of aircraft that is deployed through a single route scheduling system.
The Company determines and presents operating segments based on the information that internally is provided to Michael OLeary, CEO, who is the Companys Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM). When making resource allocation decisions the CODM evaluates route revenue and yield data, however resource allocation decisions are made based on the entire route network and the deployment of the entire aircraft fleet, which are uniform in type. The objective in making resource allocation decisions is to maximise consolidated financial results, rather than results on individual routes within the network.
The CODM assesses the performance of the business based on the consolidated adjusted profit/(loss) after tax of the Company for the year. This measure excludes the effects of certain income and expense items, which are unusual, by virtue of their size and incidence, in the context of the Companys ongoing core operations, such as the impairment of a financial asset investment, accelerated depreciation related to aircraft disposals and one off release of ticket sale revenue.
All segment revenue is derived wholly from external customers and, as the Company has a single reportable segment, inter-segment revenue is zero.
The Companys major revenue-generating asset class comprises its aircraft fleet, which is flexibly employed across the Companys integrated route network and is directly attributable to its reportable segment operations. In addition, as the Company is managed as a single business unit, all other assets and liabilities have been allocated to the Companys single reportable segment.
There have been no changes to the basis of segmentation or the measurement basis for the segment profit or loss since the prior year.
Reportable segment information is presented as follows:
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
External revenues |
5,036.7 | 4,884.0 | 4,390.2 | |||||||||
Reportable segment adjusted profit after income tax |
522.8 | 569.3 | 502.6 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other segment information: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation |
(351.8 | ) | (329.6 | ) | (309.2 | ) | ||||||
Finance income |
16.5 | 27.4 | 44.3 | |||||||||
Finance expense |
(83.2 | ) | (99.3 | ) | (109.2 | ) | ||||||
Capital expenditure |
(505.8 | ) | (310.7 | ) | (317.6 | ) |
F-43
At March 31, 2014 |
At March 31, 2013 |
At March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Reportable segment assets (i) |
8,551.8 | 8,721.8 | 8,851.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Excludes the available-for-sale financial asset. |
Reconciliation of reportable segment profit or loss to consolidated profit after income tax is as follows:
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Total adjusted profit for reportable segment |
522.8 | 569.3 | 502.6 | |||||||||
Other items of profit or loss; |
||||||||||||
One-off revenue adjustment (a) |
| | 57.8 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Consolidated profit after income tax |
522.8 | 569.3 | 560.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | The exceptional item in fiscal year 2012, relates to a one-off release of ticket sales revenue of 57.8 million, net of tax, due to a change in accounting estimates relating to the timing of revenue recognition for unused passenger tickets which was made as a result of the availability of more accurate and timely data obtained through system enhancements. |
Entity-wide disclosures:
Geographical information for revenue by country of origin is as follows:
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Ireland |
532.4 | 471.3 | 387.2 | |||||||||
United Kingdom |
1,253.6 | 1,227.1 | 1,054.6 | |||||||||
Other European countries |
3,250.7 | 3,185.6 | 2,948.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
5,036.7 | 4,884.0 | 4,390.2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ancillary revenues included in total revenue above comprise:
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Non-flight scheduled |
1,012.4 | 832.9 | 677.4 | |||||||||
In-flight |
117.3 | 109.8 | 106.7 | |||||||||
Internet income |
117.5 | 121.5 | 102.1 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
1,247.2 | 1,064.2 | 886.2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-flight scheduled revenue arises from the sale of rail and bus tickets, hotel reservations, car hire and other sources, including excess baggage charges and administration fees, all directly attributable to the low-fares business.
All of the Companys operating profit arises from low-fares airline-related activities, its only business segment. The major revenue earning assets of the Company are its aircraft, which are registered in Ireland and therefore profits accrue principally in Ireland. Since the Companys aircraft fleet is flexibly employed across its route network in Europe, there is no suitable basis of allocating such assets and related liabilities to geographical segments.
F-44
18 | Staff numbers and costs |
The average weekly number of staff, including the executive director, during the year, analysed by category, was as follows:
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
Flight and cabin crew |
8,706 | 8,280 | 7,656 | |||||||||
Sales, operations, management and administration |
795 | 779 | 782 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
9,501 | 9,059 | 8,438 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2014 the company had a team of 8,992 people (2013: 9,137; 2012: 8,388).
The aggregate payroll costs of these persons were as follows:
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Staff and related costs |
441.5 | 412.3 | 395.0 | |||||||||
Social welfare costs |
18.7 | 18.4 | 18.1 | |||||||||
Other pension costs (a) |
1.5 | 2.9 | 2.6 | |||||||||
Share based payments (b) |
1.9 | 2.0 | (0.7 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
463.6 | 435.6 | 415.0 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Costs in respect of defined-contribution benefit plans and other pension arrangements were 2.6 million in 2014 (2013: 2.1 million; 2012: 1.9 million) partially offset by a net credit of 1.1 million associated with defined-benefit plans in 2014 (2013: costs of 0.8 million; 2012: costs of 0.7 million). (See Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements). |
(b) | The net credit to the income statement in 2012 of approximately 0.7 million comprises a 2.5 million reversal of previously recognised share-based compensation expense for awards that did not vest, offset by a charge of 1.8 million for the fair value of various share options granted in prior periods, which are being recognised in the income statement in accordance with employee services rendered. |
19 | Statutory and other information |
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Directors emoluments: |
||||||||||||
-Fees |
0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||||||
-Other emoluments, including bonus and pension contributions |
1.8 | 1.3 | 1.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total directors emoluments |
2.3 | 1.6 | 1.6 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Auditors remuneration: |
||||||||||||
- Audit services (i) |
0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | |||||||||
- Tax advisory services (ii) |
0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total fees |
0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
Included within the above total fees, the following fees were payable to other KPMG firms outside of Ireland: |
||||||||||||
Audit services |
| | | |||||||||
Tax services |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total fees |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Depreciation of owned property, plant and equipment |
333.9 | 311.2 | 294.3 | |||||||||
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment held under finance leases |
17.9 | 18.4 | 14.9 | |||||||||
Operating lease charges, principally for aircraft |
101.5 | 98.2 | 90.7 |
(i) | Audit services comprise audit work performed on the consolidated financial statements. In 2014, 1,000, (2013: 1,000; 2012: 1,000) of audit fees relate to the audit of the Parent Company. |
(ii) | Tax services include all services, except those services specifically related to the audit of financial statements, performed by the independent auditors tax personnel, supporting tax-related regulatory requirements, and tax compliance and reporting. |
(a) Fees and emoluments - executive director
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Basic salary |
1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |||||||||
Bonus (performance and target-related) |
0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
1.8 | 1.3 | 1.3 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 Michael OLeary was the only executive director.
(b) Fees and emoluments non-executive directors
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Fees |
||||||||||||
David Bonderman |
0.10 | | | |||||||||
Michael Horgan |
0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |||||||||
Klaus Kirchberger (i) |
| 0.04 | 0.03 | |||||||||
Charles McCreevy |
0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |||||||||
Declan McKeon |
0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |||||||||
Kyran McLaughlin |
0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |||||||||
Dick Milliken (ii) |
0.03 | | | |||||||||
Julie ONeill |
0.05 | 0.01 | | |||||||||
James Osborne |
0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |||||||||
Louise Phelan |
0.05 | 0.01 | | |||||||||
Paolo Pietrogrande (iii) |
| 0.02 | 0.03 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
0.47 | 0.31 | 0.29 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Emoluments |
||||||||||||
Michael Horgan |
0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
0.51 | 0.35 | 0.33 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Klaus Kirchberger resigned on March 31, 2013 |
(ii) | Dick Milliken joined the Board on July 26, 2013 |
(iii) | Paolo Pietrogrande resigned on September 21, 2012 |
F-46
(c) Pension benefits
From October 1, 2008, Michael OLeary was no longer an active member of a Company defined-benefit plan. The total accumulated accrued benefit for Michael OLeary at March 31, 2014 was 0.1 million (2013: 0.1 million; 2012 0.1 million). Pension benefits have been computed in accordance with Section 6.8 of the Listing Rules of the Irish Stock Exchange. Increases in transfer values of the accrued benefits have been calculated as at the year-end in accordance with version 1.1 of Actuarial Standard of Practice PEN-11. No non-executive directors are members of the Company defined-benefit plan.
Michael OLeary is a member of a defined-contribution plan. During the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 the Company did not make contributions to the defined-contribution plan for Michael OLeary. No non-executive directors are members of the Company defined-contribution plan.
(d) Shares and share options
(i) Shares
Ryanair Holdings plc is listed on the Irish, London and NASDAQ stock exchanges.
The beneficial interests as at March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 of the directors in office at March 31, 2014 and of their spouses and dependent children in the share capital of the Company are as follows:
No. of Shares at March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
David Bonderman |
7,655,671 | 9,230,671 | 9,230,671 | |||||||||
Michael Horgan |
50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | |||||||||
Kyran McLaughlin |
200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||
Dick Milliken |
10,000 | | | |||||||||
Michael OLeary |
51,081,256 | 51,081,256 | 51,081,256 | |||||||||
James Osborne |
310,256 | 310,256 | 510,256 | |||||||||
Louise Phelan |
7,000 | | |
(ii) Share options
The share options held by each director in office at the end of fiscal 2014 were as follows:
No. of Options at March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
David Bonderman |
25,000 | 25,000 | 25,000 | |||||||||
Michael Horgan |
| 25,000 | 25,000 | |||||||||
Kyran McLaughlin |
| 25,000 | 25,000 | |||||||||
James Osborne |
25,000 | 25,000 | 25,000 |
These options were granted to these directors at an exercise price of 4.96 (the market value at the date of grant) during the 2008 fiscal year and are exercisable between June 2012 and June 2014.
Directors not referred to above held no shares or share options.
In the 2014 fiscal year the Company incurred total share-based compensation expense of nil (2013: 0.01 million; 2012: 0.1 million) in relation to directors.
F-47
20 | Finance expense |
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Interest payable on bank loans wholly repayable after five years |
82.3 | 99.1 | 109.3 | |||||||||
Interest arising on pension liabilities, net (see Note 21) |
0.9 | 0.2 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
83.2 | 99.3 | 109.2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 | Pensions |
The Company accounts for pensions in accordance with IAS 19, Employee Benefits. The Company applied IAS 19 (amendment 2011), Employee benefits with effect from April 1, 2013. The Company has not restated previously recognised amounts for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 due to this change in accounting policy. The Company has determined that any restatement of prior period amounts would not result in a material change in the previous recognised amounts.
The Company operates defined-benefit and defined-contribution schemes.
The Company funds the pension entitlements of certain employees through defined-benefit plans. At March 31, 2014 there was one plan operated for eligible UK employees.
The Irish defined benefit plan was closed effective December 31, 2013. In the year ended March 31, 2014, the Company made a final contribution of 12.5 million into the Irish defined benefit plan which represented a full and final settlement of the Companys liability to contribute to the Irish defined benefit plan.
The UK and Irish schemes were closed to new entrants on January 1, 2000. In general, on retirement, a member is entitled to a pension calculated at 1/60th of the final pensionable salary for each year of pensionable service, subject to a maximum of 40 years. The UK plan is fully funded on a discontinuance basis and the related pension costs and liabilities are assessed in accordance with the advice of a professionally qualified actuary. The investments of the UK plan at March 31, 2014 consisted of units held in independently administered funds. The most recent full actuarial valuations of the UK plan was carried out at January 1, 2011, in accordance with local regulatory requirements using the projected unit credit method, and the valuation reports are not available for public inspection.
A separate annual actuarial valuation has been performed for the purposes of preparing these financial statements. The principal actuarial assumptions used for the purpose of this actuarial valuation were as follows:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
% | % | % | ||||||||||
Discount rate used for Irish plan |
| 4.30 | 5.00 | |||||||||
Discount rate used for UK plan |
4.60 | 4.40 | 5.00 | |||||||||
Return on plan assets for Irish plan |
| 5.92 | 6.15 | |||||||||
Return on plan assets for UK plan |
7.14 | 6.52 | 6.55 | |||||||||
Rate of euro inflation |
| 2.00 | 2.00 | |||||||||
Rate of UK inflation |
3.30 | 3.30 | 3.25 | |||||||||
Future pension increases in Irish plan |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||
Future pension increases in UK plan |
3.20 | 3.20 | 3.15 | |||||||||
Future salary increases for Irish plan |
| 1.75 | 2.00 | |||||||||
Future salary increases for UK plan |
1.75 | 1.75 | 2.25 |
The Company uses certain mortality rate assumptions when calculating scheme liabilities. The mortality assumptions of the UK scheme have been based on the SAPS mortality table while the mortality assumptions of the Irish scheme for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 have been based on the mortality table 62%/70% PNM/FL00. Both mortality assumptions make allowance for future improvements in mortality rates. Retirement ages for scheme members are 60 for pilots and 65 for other staff.
F-48
The current life expectancies underlying the value of the scheme liabilities for the UK scheme are as follows:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
Retiring at age 60: |
||||||||||||
Male |
26.6 | 26.4 | 26.4 | |||||||||
Female |
28.9 | 28.7 | 28.7 | |||||||||
Retiring at age 65: |
||||||||||||
Male |
22.1 | 21.9 | 21.9 | |||||||||
Female |
24.1 | 23.9 | 23.9 |
The amounts recognised in the consolidated balance sheet in respect of defined benefit plans are as follows:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Present value of benefit obligations |
(11.5 | ) | (48.1 | ) | (42.2 | ) | ||||||
Fair value of plan assets |
9.8 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Present value of net obligations |
(1.7 | ) | (13.5 | ) | (11.9 | ) | ||||||
Related deferred tax asset |
0.2 | 1.7 | 1.5 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net pension liability |
(1.5 | ) | (11.8 | ) | (10.4 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts recognised in the consolidated income statement in respect of our defined-benefit plans are as follows:
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Included in payroll costs |
||||||||||||
Service cost |
0.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | |||||||||
Settlement gain |
(1.9 | ) | | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net defined benefit pension (gain)/costs |
(1.1 | ) | 0.9 | 0.7 | ||||||||
Included in finance expense |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net finance expense |
0.9 | 0.2 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of amounts included in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (CSOCI);
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Return on scheme assets |
0.1 | 2.0 | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||
Experience gains/(loss) on scheme liabilities |
| 0.3 | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in assumptions underlying the present value of scheme liabilities |
(1.9 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (5.5 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Actuarial loss recognised in the CSOCI |
(1.8 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (7.1 | ) | ||||||
Related deferred tax asset |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net actuarial losses recognised in the CSOCI |
(1.6 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (6.3 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
Changes in the present value of the defined-benefit obligation of the plans are as follows:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year |
48.1 | 42.2 | 32.9 | |||||||||
Service cost |
0.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | |||||||||
Interest cost |
1.7 | 2.1 | 1.9 | |||||||||
Plan participants contributions |
0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Actuarial loss |
1.9 | 3.5 | 6.2 | |||||||||
Benefits paid |
(0.7 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||
Foreign exchange rate changes |
0.3 | (0.1 | ) | 0.5 | ||||||||
Liabilities extinguished on closure of Irish defined benefit plan |
(40.8 | ) | | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Projected benefit obligation at end of year funded |
11.5 | 48.1 | 42.2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair values of the plans assets are as follows:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
34.6 | 30.3 | 27.9 | |||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
0.4 | 1.9 | 2.0 | |||||||||
Interest income |
0.8 | | | |||||||||
Actuarial gain/(loss) on plan assets |
0.1 | 2.0 | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||
Employer contribution |
0.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 | |||||||||
Settlement on closure of Irish defined benefit plan |
12.5 | | | |||||||||
Plan participants contributions |
0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Benefits paid |
(0.7 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||
Foreign exchange rate changes |
0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | |||||||||
Assets distributed on closure of Irish defined benefit plan |
(38.9 | ) | | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
9.8 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the plans assets at March 31 of each year is analysed as follows:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 (i) | 2013 (ii) | 2012 (ii) | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Equities |
1.9 | 26.8 | 22.5 | |||||||||
Bonds |
7.0 | 5.8 | 5.4 | |||||||||
Property |
0.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |||||||||
Other assets |
0.8 | 1.3 | 1.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total fair value of plan assets |
9.8 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Amounts for the year ended March 31, 2014 relate to the UK plan only. |
(ii) | Amounts for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 relate to both the Irish and UK plans combined. |
The plans assets do not include any of our own financial instruments, nor any property occupied by, or other assets used by us.
The expected long-term rate of return on assets of 7.14% (2013: 6.52%; 2012: 6.55%) for the UK scheme was calculated based on the assumptions of the following returns for each asset class: Equities 8.30% (2013: 7.50%; 2012: 7.50%); Corporate and Overseas Bonds 4.30% (2013: 4.40%; 2012: 4.65%); and Other 3.65% (2013: 2.85%; 2012: 3.00%).
Since there are no suitable euro-denominated AA-rated corporate bonds, the expected return is estimated by adding a suitable risk premium to the rate available from government bonds. The assumptions are based on long-term expectations at the beginning of the reporting period and are expected to be relatively stable.
F-50
The history of the plans for the current and prior periods is as follows:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||
Difference between expected and actual return on assets |
0.1 | 2.0 | (0.8 | ) | (0.3 | ) | 5.6 | |||||||||||||
Expressed as a percentage of scheme assets |
1 | % | 6 | % | (3 | %) | (1 | %) | 22 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Experience (loss)/gain on scheme liabilities |
| 0.3 | (0.8 | ) | 0.9 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||
Expressed as a percentage of scheme liabilities |
| % | 1 | % | (2 | %) | 3 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total actuarial (losses)/gains |
(1.8 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (7.1 | ) | 5.5 | | ||||||||||||
Expressed as a percentage of scheme liabilities |
(17 | %) | (3 | %) | (17 | %) | 17 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects to contribute approximately 0.2 million to our defined-benefit plan in 2014.
Defined-contribution schemes
The Company operates defined-contribution retirement plans in Ireland and the UK. The costs of these plans are charged to the consolidated income statement in the period in which they are incurred. The pension cost of these defined-contribution plans was 2.6 million in 2014 (2013: 2.1 million; 2012: 1.9 million).
22 | Earnings per share |
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per ordinary share (in euro cent) |
36.96 | 39.45 | 38.03 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Diluted earnings per ordinary share (in euro cent) |
36.86 | 39.33 | 37.94 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Number of ordinary shares (in Ms) used for EPS |
||||||||||||
Basic |
1,414.6 | 1,443.1 | 1,473.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Diluted (a) |
1,418.2 | 1,447.4 | 1,477.0 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Details of share options in issue have been described more fully in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements. See below for explanation of diluted number of ordinary shares. |
Diluted earnings per share takes account solely of the potential future exercise of share options granted under the Companys share option schemes. For the 2014 fiscal year, the weighted average number of shares in issue of 1,418.2 million includes weighted average share options assumed to be converted, and equal to a total of 3.6 million shares. For the 2013 fiscal year, the weighted average number of shares in issue of 1,447.4 million includes weighted average share options assumed to be converted, and equal to a total of 4.3 million shares. For the 2012 fiscal year, the weighted average number of shares in issue of 1,477.0 million includes weighted average share options assumed to be converted, and equal to a total of 3.3 million shares.
23 | Commitments and contingencies |
Commitments
In March 2013, the Group entered into a contract with Boeing (the 2013 Boeing Contract) whereby the Group agree to purchase 175 Boeing 737-800 next-generation aircraft over a five year period from calendar 2014 to 2018.
In April 2014, the Company agreed to purchase an additional 5 Boeing 737-800 next-generation aircraft for delivery in fiscal year 2016 on the same terms and conditions as the 2013 Boeing Contract bringing the total firm new deliveries to 180 aircraft.
F-51
The table below details the firm aircraft delivery schedule at March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 for the Company pursuant to the 2013 Boeing contracts.
Aircraft Delivered at March 31, 2014 |
Firm Aircraft Deliveries Fiscal 2014/ 2015 |
Firm Aircraft Deliveries Post Fiscal 2014/2015 |
Total Firm Aircraft |
Basic price per aircraft (U.S.$ million) |
Firm Aircraft Deliveries Fiscal 2013- 2014 at March 31, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||
2013 Contract |
0 | 11 | 164 | 175 | 78.0 | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
0 | 11 | 164 | 175 | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Basic Price (equivalent to a standard list price for an aircraft of this type) for each aircraft governed by the 2013 Boeing contract will be increased by (a) an estimated U.S.$2.9 million per aircraft for certain buyer furnished equipment the Company has asked Boeing to purchase and install on each of the aircraft, and (b) an Escalation Factor designed to increase the Basic Price, as defined in the purchase agreement, of any individual aircraft by applying a formula which reflects increases in the published U.S. Employment Cost and Producer Price indices between the time the Basic Price was set and the period of 18 to 24 months prior to the delivery of such aircraft.
Boeing has granted Ryanair certain price concessions with regard to the Boeing 737-800 next generation aircraft as part of the Boeing 2013 Contract. These take the form of credit memoranda to the Company for the amount of such concessions, which the Company may apply toward the purchase of goods and services from Boeing or toward certain payments, other than advance payments, in respect of the purchase of the aircraft under the various Boeing contracts.
Boeing and CFMI (the manufacturer of the engines to be fitted on the purchased aircraft) have also agreed to give the Company certain allowances in addition to providing other goods and services to the Company on concessionary terms. These credit memoranda and allowances will effectively reduce the price of each aircraft to the Company. As a result, the effective price of each aircraft (the purchase price of the new aircraft net of discounts received from Boeing) will be significantly below the Basic Price mentioned above. At March 31, 2014, the total potential commitment to acquire all 175 firm aircraft, not taking such increases and decreases into account, will be approximately U.S. $13.8 billion. At March 31, 2013, the total potential commitment was U.S. $13.8 billion to acquire all 175 firm aircraft.
Operating leases
The Company financed 76 of the Boeing 737-800 aircraft delivered between December 2003 and March 2014 under seven-year, sale-and-leaseback arrangements with a number of international leasing companies, pursuant to which each lessor purchased an aircraft and leased it to Ryanair under an operating lease. Between October 2010 and December 2012, 17 operating lease aircraft were returned to the lessor at the agreed maturity date of the lease. At March 31, 2014 Ryanair had 51 operating lease aircraft in the fleet. As a result, Ryanair operates, but does not own, these aircraft. Ryanair has no right or obligation to acquire these aircraft at the end of the relevant lease terms. 18 of these leases are denominated in euro and require Ryanair to make fixed rental payments over the term of the leases. 33 remaining operating leases are U.S. dollar-denominated which require Ryanair to make fixed rental payments. The Company has an option to extend the initial period of seven years on 34 of the 51 remaining operating lease aircraft as at March 31, 2014, on pre-determined terms. This includes 3 operating lease arrangements which are due to mature during the year ended March 31, 2015 but have been extended for a further 7 years. The following table sets out the total future minimum payments of leasing 51 aircraft (2013: 59 aircraft; 2012: 59 aircraft), ignoring movement in interest rates, foreign currency and hedging arrangements, at March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum payments |
Present value of Minimum payments |
Minimum payments |
Present value of Minimum payments |
Minimum payments |
Present value of minimum payments |
|||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
Due within one year |
118.7 | 112.7 | 107.2 | 98.4 | 116.9 | 106.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Due between one and five years |
292.1 | 246.5 | 342.4 | 258.0 | 328.0 | 232.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Due after five years |
61.9 | 44.4 | 94.5 | 53.3 | 160.9 | 87.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
472.7 | 403.6 | 544.1 | 409.7 | 605.8 | 426.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-52
Finance leases
The Company financed 30 Boeing 737-800 aircraft delivered between March 2005 and March 2014 with 13-year euro-denominated Japanese Operating Leases with Call Options (JOLCOs). These structures are accounted for as finance leases and are initially recorded at fair value in the Companys balance sheet. Under each of these contracts, Ryanair has a call option to purchase the aircraft at a pre-determined price after a period of 10.5 years, which it may exercise.
The following table sets out the total future minimum payments of leasing 30 aircraft (2013: 30 aircraft; 2012: 30 aircraft) under JOLCOs at March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively:
At March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum payments |
Present value of Minimum payments |
Minimum payments |
Present value of Minimum payments |
Minimum payments |
Present value of minimum payments |
|||||||||||||||||||
M | M | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
Due within one year |
78.1 | 73.5 | 58.1 | 53.4 | 63.2 | 51.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Due between one and five years |
408.6 | 250.0 | 359.1 | 260.9 | 318.9 | 243.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Due after five years |
248.4 | 83.9 | 365.7 | 146.5 | 484.0 | 217.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total minimum lease payments |
735.1 | 407.4 | 782.9 | 460.8 | 866.1 | 511.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less amounts allocated to future financing costs |
(18.2 | ) | | (20.3 | ) | | (60.1 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Present value of minimum lease payments |
716.9 | 407.4 | 762.6 | 460.8 | 806.0 | 511.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments resulting from the use of derivative financial instruments by the Company are described in Notes 5 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
Contingencies
The Company is engaged in litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. Management does not believe that any such litigation will individually or in aggregate have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company. Should the Company be unsuccessful in these litigation actions, management believes the possible liabilities then arising cannot be determined but are not expected to materially adversely affect the Companys results of operations or financial position.
F-53
In February 2004, the European Commission ruled that Ryanair had received illegal state aid from the Walloon regional government in connection with its establishment of a low cost base at Brussels (Charleroi). Ryanair advised the regional government that it believed no money was repayable as the cost of establishing the base exceeded the amount determined to be illegal state aid. Ryanair also appealed the decision of the European Commission to the European Court of First Instance (CFI), requesting that the Court annul the decision on the basis that Ryanairs agreement at Brussels (Charleroi) was consistent with agreements at similar privately owned airports and therefore did not constitute illegal state aid. The Company placed 4.0 million in an escrow account pending the outcome of this appeal. In December 2008, the CFI annulled the Commissions decision against Charleroi Airport and Ryanair was repaid the 4 million that the Commission had claimed was illegal state aid. A further action taken by the Belgian government for 2.3 million has also been withdrawn.
Ryanair is facing similar legal challenges with respect to agreements with certain other airports. In January 2010, the European Commission concluded the Bratislava state aid investigation with a finding that Ryanairs agreement with Bratislava airport involved no aid. In July 2012 the European Commission found that Ryanairs arrangement with Tampere airport contained no aid. In February 2014 the European Commission reached the same conclusion in respect of Marseille, Aarhus and Berlin (Schönefeld) investigations. On July 23, 2014 the European Commission announced a no state aid decision in respect of Dusseldorf (Weeze) airport, as well as findings of state aid to Ryanair in its arrangements with Pau, Nimes and Angouleme airports, ordering Ryanair to repay a total of approximately 9.7m of alleged aid. Ryanair will appeal these aid decisions to the EU General Court where proceedings are expected to take between 2 and 4 years. The remaining fourteen investigations involving Ryanair and Lübeck, Alghero, Frankfurt (Hahn), Zweibrücken, Altenburg, Klagenfurt, (Stockholm) Vasteras, Paris (Beauvais), La Rochelle, Carcassonne, Cagliari, Brussels (Charleroi), Girona and Reus airports are ongoing and Ryanair currently expects that they will conclude mid to late 2014, with any European Commission decisions appealable to the EU General Court.
State aid complaints by Lufthansa about Ryanairs cost base at Frankfurt (Hahn) have been rejected by German courts, as have similar complaints by Air Berlin in relation to Ryanairs arrangement with Lubeck airport, but following a German Supreme Court ruling on a procedural issue in early 2011, these cases will be re-heard by lower courts. In addition, Ryanair has been involved in legal challenges including allegations of state aid at Alghero, Berlin (Schönefeld) and Marseille airports. The Alghero case (initiated by Air One) was dismissed in its entirety in April 2011. The Berlin (Schönefeld) case (initiated by Germania) was discontinued following the European Commissions finding in February 2014 that Ryanairs arrangement with the airport contained no state aid. The Marseille case was withdrawn by the plaintiffs (subsidiaries of Air France) in May 2011.
The Company has also entered into a series of interest rate swaps to hedge against fluctuations in interest rates for certain floating-rate financing arrangements. Cash deposits have been set aside as collateral for the counterpartys exposure to risk of fluctuations on long-term derivative and other financing arrangements with Ryanair (restricted cash) (see Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further details). Additional numerical information on these swaps and on other derivatives held by the Company is set out in Notes 5 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
F-54
24 | Note to cash flow statement |
At March 31, | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Net debt at beginning of year |
60.7 | (109.6 | ) | (708.8 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents in year |
489.2 | (1,467.4 | ) | 680.0 | ||||||||
(Decrease)/increase in financial assets > 3 months |
(795.1 | ) | 1,521.2 | (97.2 | ) | |||||||
Decrease in restricted cash |
(11.4 | ) | (10.4 | ) | (7.8 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flow from decrease in debt |
414.7 | 126.9 | 24.2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Movement in net funds resulting from cash flows |
97.4 | 170.3 | 599.2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net funds/(debt) at end of year |
158.1 | 60.7 | (109.6 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Analysed as: |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, financial assets and restricted cash |
3,241.7 | 3,559.0 | 3,515.6 | |||||||||
Total borrowings * |
(3,083.6 | ) | (3,498.3 | ) | (3,625.2 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net funds/(debt) |
158.1 | 60.7 | (109.6 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | includes both current and non-current maturities of debt. |
25 | Dividends and share buy-backs |
In the year ended March 31, 2014 the Company bought back 69.5 million ordinary shares (including just over 6.0 million American Depository Receipts (ADRs) which each represented five ordinary shares) at a total cost of 481.7 million. This is equivalent to approximately 4.8% of the Companys issued share capital at March 31, 2013. All ordinary shares repurchased have been cancelled. Accordingly, share capital decreased by 69.5 million ordinary shares with a nominal value of 0.4 million and the capital redemption reserve increased by a corresponding 0.4 million. The capital redemption reserve is required to be created under Irish law to preserve permanent capital in the Parent Company.
On June 20, 2013 the Company detailed plans to return up to 1.0 billion to shareholders over the following two years. At March 31, 2014 481.7 million has been completed via share buybacks and up to 520 million in special dividends is planned to be returned in the fiscal year 2015 (subject to profitability and shareholder approval at the AGM on September 25, 2014).
26 | Post-balance sheet events |
On April 30, 2014, the Company agreed to purchase an additional 5 Boeing 737 800 Next Generation aircraft for delivery in fiscal 2016, bringing the total number of aircraft to be purchased from Boeing to 180 for delivery between fiscal year 2015 and 2019, with a list value of approximately $14.1 billion.
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company entered into 8 short-term aircraft leases between May and September 2014 to support the capacity requirements prior to delivery of new aircraft in September 2014.
On May 19, 2014, the Company indicated that it plans to pay a special dividend of up to 520 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, subject to shareholder approval at its annual general meeting on September 25, 2014.
On June 10, 2014, Ryanair issued an unsecured 850.0 million eurobond at a fixed coupon of 1.875%, fixed for 7 years. Under Ryanairs 3 billion EMTN program Ryanair Holdings guarantees any issuance of notes, including Ryanairs issuance of an 850.0 million eurobond in June 2014.
F-55
27 | Subsidiary undertakings and related party transactions |
The following is the principal subsidiary undertaking of Ryanair Holdings plc:
Name | Effective date of |
Registered |
Nature of | |||
Ryanair Limited (a) |
August 23, 1996 (acquisition) |
Airside Business Park Swords Co Dublin, Ireland. |
Airline operator |
(a) | Ryanair Limited is wholly owned by Ryanair Holdings plc. |
Information regarding all other subsidiaries will be filed with the Companys next Irish Annual Return as provided for by Section 16(3) of the Irish Companies (Amendment) Act, 1986.
In accordance with the basis of consolidation policy, as described in Note 1 of these consolidated financial statements, the subsidiary undertaking referred to above has been consolidated in the financial statements of Ryanair Holdings plc for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.
The total amount of remuneration paid to senior key management (defined as the executive team reporting to the Board of Directors) and directors amounted to 7.9 million in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, (2013: 7.1 million; 2012: 5.0 million), the majority of which comprises short-term employee benefits.
Year ended March 31, 2014 |
Year ended March 31, 2013 |
Year ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
M | M | M | ||||||||||
Basic salary and bonus |
6.8 | 6.0 | 5.9 | |||||||||
Pension contributions |
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||
Share-based compensation expense (a) |
1.0 | 1.0 | (1.0 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
7.9 | 7.1 | 5.0 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | In the year ended March 31, 2012, the net credit to the income statement in the year comprises a reversal of previously recognised share-based compensation expense for awards that did not vest, offset by a charge for the fair value of various share options granted in prior periods, which are being recognised within the income statement in accordance with employee services rendered. |
28 | Date of approval |
The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors of the Company on July 25, 2014.
F-56
APPENDIX A
GLOSSARY
Certain of the terms included in the section on Selected Operating and Other Data and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F have the meanings indicated below and refer only to Ryanairs scheduled passenger service.
Available Seat Miles (ASMs) |
Represents the number of seats available for passengers multiplied by the number of miles those seats were flown. | |
Average Booked Passenger Fare |
Represents the average fare paid by a fare-paying passenger who has booked a ticket. | |
Average Daily Flight Hour Utilization |
Represents the average number of flight hours flown in service per day per aircraft for the total fleet of operated aircraft. | |
Average Fuel Cost Per U.S. Gallon |
Represents the average cost per U.S. gallon of jet fuel for the fleet (including fueling charges) after giving effect to fuel hedging arrangements. | |
Average Length of Passenger Haul |
Represents the average number of miles traveled by a fare-paying passenger. | |
Ancillary Revenue per Booked Passenger |
Represents the average revenue earned per booked passenger flown from ancillary services. | |
Average Yield per ASM |
Represents the average flown passenger fare revenue for each available seat mile (ASM). | |
Average Yield per RPM |
Represents the average passenger fare revenue for each revenue passenger mile (RPM), or each mile a revenue passenger has flown. | |
Baggage Commissions |
Represents the commissions payable to airports on the revenue collected at the airports for excess baggage and airport baggage fees. | |
Booked Passenger Load Factor |
Represents the total number of seats sold as a percentage of total seat capacity on all sectors flown. | |
Break-even Load Factor |
Represents the number of RPMs at which passenger revenues would have been equal to operating expenses divided by ASMs (based on Average Yield per RPM). For the purposes of this calculation, the number of RPMs at which passenger revenues would have been equal to operating expenses is calculated by dividing operating expenses by Average Revenue per RPM. | |
Cost Per ASM (CASM) |
Represents operating expenses (excluding ancillary costs) divided by ASMs. | |
Cost Per Booked Passenger |
Represents operating expenses divided by revenue passengers booked. | |
Net Margin |
Represents profit after taxation as a percentage of total revenues. | |
Number of Airports Served |
Represents the number of airports to/from which the carrier offered scheduled service at the end of the period. | |
Number of Owned Aircraft Operated |
Represents the number of aircraft owned and operated at the end of the period. | |
Operating Margin |
Represents operating profit as a percentage of total revenues. | |
Part 145 |
The European regulatory standard for aircraft maintenance established by the European Aviation Safety Agency. | |
Revenue Passenger Miles (RPMs) |
Represents the number of miles flown by booked fare-paying passengers. | |
Revenue Passengers Booked |
Represents the number of fare-paying passengers booked. | |
Sectors Flown |
Represents the number of passenger flight sectors flown. |
A-1