UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. | |||
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
(5) | Total fee paid:
| |||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
(3) | Filing Party:
| |||
(4) | Date Filed:
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT
for Annual Meeting of Stockholders
March 29, 2019
Dear Stockholders:
Please join us for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Thursday, May 9, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., Central time, at the Canopy by Hilton Dallas Uptown, 2950 Cityplace West Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75204.
In accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission rules allowing companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders over the Internet, we have sent stockholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2019 a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on or about March 29, 2019. The notice contains instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and Annual Report and vote online. If you would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials from us instead of downloading a printable version from the Internet, please follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the notice, as well as in the attached Proxy Statement.
Attached to this letter are a Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, which describe the business to be conducted at the meeting. We also will report on matters of current interest to our stockholders.
Your vote is important to us. Whether you own a few shares or many, and whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. You may vote your shares on the Internet, by telephone or by completing, signing and promptly returning a proxy card or you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Voting online, by telephone or by returning your proxy card does not deprive you of your right to attend the Annual Meeting. If you do attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote your shares personally, you may revoke your proxy at or prior to the Annual Meeting.
Thank you for your continued support of Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
Sincerely,
Jonathan D. Gray | Christopher J. Nassetta | |||
Chairman of the Board of Directors | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT |
HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TIME | 10:00 a.m., Central time, on May 9, 2019 | |||
PLACE | The Canopy by Hilton Dallas Uptown, 2950 Cityplace West Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75204 | |||
ITEMS OF BUSINESS | 1. | To elect the director nominees listed in the Proxy Statement. | ||
2. | To approve the Hilton 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | |||
3. | To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019. | |||
4. | To approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers. | |||
5. | To consider such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. | |||
RECORD DATE | You may vote at the Annual Meeting if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 15, 2019. | |||
VOTING BY PROXY | To ensure your shares are voted, you may vote your shares over the Internet, by telephone or by requesting a proxy card to complete, sign and return by mail. Internet and telephone voting procedures are described on the following page, in the Questions and Answers section beginning on page 49 of the Proxy Statement and on the proxy card. |
By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||
Kristin A. Campbell | ||
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement are first being distributed or made available, as the case may be, on or about March 29, 2019.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 9, 2019: This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report are available free of charge at www.proxyvote.com, a site that does not have cookies that identify visitors to the site.
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT |
VOTING INFORMATION
If at the close of business on March 15, 2019, you were a stockholder of record or held shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may vote your shares by proxy through the Internet, by telephone or by mail, or you may vote in person at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting). For shares held through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may vote by submitting voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. Please refer to information from your broker, bank or other nominee on how to submit voting instructions. To reduce our administrative costs and help the environment by conserving natural resources, we ask that you vote through the Internet or by telephone, both of which are available 24 hours a day. You may revoke your proxies at the times and in the manners described on page 51 of the Proxy Statement.
If you are a stockholder of record or hold shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and are voting by proxy, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on May 8, 2019 to be counted.
To vote by proxy:
BY INTERNET
· | Go to the website www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. |
· | You will need the 16-digit number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card to vote online. |
BY TELEPHONE
· | From a touch-tone telephone, dial 1-800-690-6903 and follow the recorded instructions, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. |
· | You will need the 16-digit number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card in order to vote by telephone. |
BY MAIL
· | Request a proxy card from us by following the instructions on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. |
· | When you receive the proxy card, mark your selections on the proxy card. |
· | Date and sign your name exactly as it appears on your proxy card. |
· | Mail the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope provided to you. |
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT TO US. THANK YOU FOR VOTING.
PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
5 | ||||
5 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
8 | ||||
8 | ||||
8 | ||||
8 | ||||
8 | ||||
9 | ||||
10 | ||||
11 | ||||
11 | ||||
11 | ||||
11 | ||||
12 | ||||
13 | ||||
14 | ||||
14 | ||||
15 | ||||
16 | ||||
Proposal No. 3 Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
17 | |||
17 | ||||
18 | ||||
19 | ||||
20 | ||||
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) |
21 | |||
21 | ||||
24 | ||||
24 | ||||
25 | ||||
25 | ||||
Executive Compensation Program Overview & Pay for Performance |
26 | |||
27 | ||||
27 | ||||
30 | ||||
33 | ||||
33 | ||||
33 | ||||
34 |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT |
34 | ||||
35 | ||||
35 | ||||
35 | ||||
35 | ||||
36 | ||||
37 | ||||
38 | ||||
39 | ||||
40 | ||||
41 | ||||
42 | ||||
44 | ||||
45 | ||||
46 | ||||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
49 | ||||
52 | ||||
52 | ||||
53 | ||||
53 | ||||
A-1 | ||||
A-1 | ||||
Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciliations Adjusted EBITDA |
A-2 | |||
B-1 |
PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS INC.
7930 Jones Branch Drive
Suite 1100
McLean, Virginia 22102
Telephone: (703) 883-1000
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
May 9, 2019
2018 COMPANY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
Net Income $769M
|
Adj. $2,101M
|
Pipeline +6% Year-over-Year (YOY)
|
Development Market Share Nearly 4X Current Share Highest in Industry
|
Net Unit Growth +7% YOY |
Opened >1 Hotel per day |
$1.9B Total Capital Returned to Stockholders |
Launched Industry-Leading Corporate Responsibility Goals |
Ranked #1 Best Companies to Work For #2 Worlds Best Workplace & #1 for Parents & Diversity in the U.S. |
GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
Our commitment to strong governance practices is illustrated by the following:
· Annual election of directors
· Lead independent director
· Single class of voting stock
· Majority voting standard for directors in uncontested elections
· Proxy access by-law
· No stockholder rights plan; and if our Board were ever to adopt a stockholder rights plan in the future without prior stockholder approval, we would either submit the plan to stockholders for ratification or cause the rights plan to expire within one year
· Named one of the Worlds Most Ethical Companies by The Ethisphere Institute |
VOTING ROADMAP | Our Boards Recommendation |
Proposal No. 1: Election of All Director Nominees
|
FOR
| |||
Our Board of Directors believes that all of the director nominees listed in this Proxy Statement have the requisite qualifications to provide effective oversight of the Companys business and management. |
|
Proposal No. 2: Approval of Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
FOR | |||
Our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors believe that the approval of the Hilton 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. |
|
Proposal No. 3: Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm
|
FOR | |||
Our Audit Committee and Board of Directors believe that the retention of Ernst & Young as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for 2019 is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. |
|
Proposal No. 4: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
|
FOR | |||
We are seeking a non-binding, advisory vote to approve, and our Board of Directors recommends the approval of, the 2018 compensation paid to our named executive officers, which is described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled Executive Compensation. |
|
(1) | Please see Annex A for additional information and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to financial measures derived in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). |
(2) | Excluding our CEO; including the CEO, 44% of our directors are women. |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 1 |
PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors (the Board or Board of Directors) has considered and nominated the following nominees for a one-year term expiring at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified: Christopher J. Nassetta; Jonathan D. Gray; Charlene T. Begley; Melanie L. Healey; Raymond E. Mabus, Jr.; Judith A. McHale; John G. Schreiber; Elizabeth A. Smith and Douglas M. Steenland. Action will be taken at the Annual Meeting for the election of these nominees.
Unless otherwise instructed, the persons named in the form of proxy card (the proxyholders) included with this Proxy Statement, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), intend to vote the proxies held by them for the election of the director nominees. If any of these nominees ceases to be a candidate for election by the time of the Annual Meeting, such proxies may be voted by the proxyholders in accordance with the recommendation of the Board. Except where the context requires otherwise, references to the Company, Hilton, we, us and our refer to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN 2019
The following information describes the offices held, other business directorships and the term of each director nominee as of March 1, 2019. Beneficial ownership of equity securities of the director nominees is shown under Ownership of Securities below.
Christopher J. Nassetta
|
Christopher J. Nassetta, 56, joined Hilton as President and Chief Executive Officer in December 2007 and has served as a director of Hilton since that time. Previously, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Host Hotels and Resorts, Inc., a position he held from May 2000 until October 2007. He joined Host in 1995 as Executive Vice President and was elected Chief Operating Officer in 1997. Before joining Host, Mr. Nassetta co-founded Bailey Capital Corporation, a real estate investment and advisory firm, in 1991. Prior to this, he spent seven years at The Oliver Carr Company, a commercial real estate company, where he ultimately served as Chief Development Officer. Mr. Nassetta is an Advisory Board member for the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia and is Vice Chairman of the Corporate Fund for The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. He is on the board of the Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts. He is also a member of the board of directors, nominating and corporate governance committee and compensation committee of CoStar Group, Inc. He is also a member and a past Chairman of The Real Estate Roundtable, Chairman and Executive Committee member of the World Travel & Tourism Council, a member of the Economic Club of Washington, a member of Federal City Council, and has served in various positions at the Arlington Free Clinic. Mr. Nassetta graduated from the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia with a degree in Finance.
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience: experience as an executive in the hospitality industry, extensive financial background and experience with real estate investments; his role as our President and Chief Executive Officer brings management perspective to board deliberations and provides valuable information about the status of our day-to-day operations. |
Jonathan D. Gray
|
Jonathan D. Gray, 49, is Chairman of our Board and has served as a director of Hilton since 2007. Mr. Gray is President and Chief Operating Officer of Blackstone Group Management L.L.C., the general partner of The Blackstone Group L.P. (Blackstone), and has served as a member of the board of directors of Blackstone since February 2012. He previously served as global head of real estate for Blackstone from January 2012 through February 2018. He also sits on Blackstones management committee. Mr. Gray served as a senior managing director and co-head of real estate from January 2005 to December 2011. Since joining Blackstone in 1992, Mr. Gray has helped build the largest private equity real estate platform in the world with over $120 billion in investor capital under management as of September 30, 2018. Mr. Gray received a B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School, as well as a B.A. in English from the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, where he graduated magna cum laude and was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. He also serves on the board of Harlem Village Academies and Trinity School. He previously served as a board member of Nevada Property 1 LLC (The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas), Invitation Homes Inc., Brixmor Property Group and La Quinta Holdings Inc. Mr. Gray and his wife, Mindy, have established the Basser Research Center at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, which focuses on the prevention and treatment of certain genetically caused breast and ovarian cancers.
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience: substantial experience with real estate investing and extensive financial background, including in-depth knowledge of the real estate and hospitality industries. |
2 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
Charlene T. Begley
|
Charlene T. Begley, 52, has served as a director of Hilton since 2017. Ms. Begley served in various capacities at General Electric Company from 1988 through 2013. Most recently, she served in a dual role as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, as well as the President and Chief Executive Officer of GEs Home and Business Solutions business from January 2010 through December 2013. Ms. Begley served as President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Enterprise Solutions from August 2007 through December 2009. During her career at GE, she served as President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Plastics and GE Transportation, led GEs Corporate Audit staff and served as the Chief Financial Officer for GE Transportation and GE Plastics Europe and India. Ms. Begley currently serves as a director and member of the audit committee and management compensation committee of Nasdaq, Inc., and as a director and member of the audit and nominating committees of Red Hat, Inc.
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience: extensive business and management expertise, including leading divisions of a global enterprise, significant experience in technology, finance and information security, and service as a director of several public companies. |
Melanie L. Healey
|
Melanie L. Healey, 57, has served as a director of Hilton since 2017. Ms. Healey served as Group President of The Procter & Gamble Company from 2007 to 2015. During her tenure at Procter & Gamble, one of the leading providers of branded consumer packaged goods, Ms. Healey held several leadership roles, including Group President and advisor to the Chairman and CEO, Group President, North America, and Group President, Global Health, Feminine and Adult Care Sector. Ms. Healey has more than 30 years of strategic, branding and operating experience from leading consumer goods companies including Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson and S.C. Johnson & Sons. Ms. Healey also serves as a director of PPG Industries, Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Target Corporation.
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience: extensive business and management experience, including leadership roles in a global enterprise, significant experience in strategy, brands, consumer marketing and international operations, and service as a director of several public companies. |
Raymond E. Mabus, Jr.
|
Raymond E. Mabus, Jr., 70, has served as a director of Hilton since 2017. Mr. Mabus brings significant public sector experience to the Hilton board, having served as the 75th United States Secretary of the Navy from 2009 to 2017. He was the United States Ambassador to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from 1994 to 1996, the 60th Governor of Mississippi from 1988 to 1992, and Auditor of the State of Mississippi from 1984 to 1988. In the private sector, Mr. Mabus served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Foamex International, and a member of the board of directors of Enersys and Kroll. He currently serves on the board of directors of Dana Incorporated.
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience: extensive international experience, including as U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia, public policy and government relations experience, including as Secretary of the Navy and governor of the State of Mississippi, and public company executive and board experience. |
Judith A. McHale
|
Judith A. McHale, 72, has served as a director of Hilton since 2013. Ms. McHale has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cane Investments, LLC since August 2011. From May 2009 to July 2011, Ms. McHale served as Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs for the U.S. Department of State. From 2006 to March 2009, Ms. McHale served as a Managing Partner in the formation of GEF/ Africa Growth Fund. Prior to that, Ms. McHale served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Discovery Communications. Ms. McHale currently serves on the board of directors of Ralph Lauren Corporation and Viacom, Inc. and previously served on the board of directors of Sea World Entertainment, Inc. Ms. McHale graduated from the University of Nottingham in England and Fordham University School of Law.
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience: extensive business and management expertise, including experience as a chief executive officer and director of several public companies, as well as prior service as a high-ranking official in the U.S. Department of State. |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 3 |
John G. Schreiber
|
John G. Schreiber, 72, has served as a director of Hilton since 2007. Mr. Schreiber is the President of Centaur Capital Partners, his family investment office, and a retired Partner and Co-Founder of Blackstone Real Estate Advisors (BREA). As Co-Chairman of the BREA Investment Committee, Mr. Schreiber oversaw all Blackstone real estate investments from 1992 to 2015. During that time, Blackstone invested over $75 billion of equity in a wide variety of real estate transactions. Mr. Schreiber is a past board member of Urban Shopping Centers, Inc., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., The Rouse Company, AMLI Residential Properties Trust, General Growth Properties, Inc., Blackstone Mortgage Trust Inc., Invitation Homes Inc. and Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. He currently serves on the board of JMB Realty Corp. and Brixmor Property Group Inc. and is a director/trustee of a number of mutual funds managed by T. Rowe Price Associates and a Trustee of Loyola University of Chicago. Mr. Schreiber graduated from Loyola University of Chicago and received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience: substantial experience with real estate investing and extensive financial background, including in-depth knowledge of the real estate and hospitality industries. |
Elizabeth A. Smith
|
Elizabeth A. Smith, 55, has served as a director of Hilton since 2013. Ms. Smith is the Executive Chair of the Board of Directors of Bloomin Brands, Inc. as of April 1, 2019. She served as Chairman since January 2012 and served as its Chief Executive Officer and a Director since November 2009. From September 2007 to October 2009, Ms. Smith was President of Avon Products, Inc., a global beauty products company, and was responsible for its worldwide product-to-market processes, infrastructure and systems, including Global Brand Marketing, Global Sales, Global Supply Chain and Global Information Technology. In January 2005, Ms. Smith joined Avon Products, Inc. as President, Global Brand, and was given the additional role of leading Avon North America in August 2005. From September 1990 to November 2004, Ms. Smith worked in various capacities at Kraft Foods Inc. Ms. Smith currently serves on the board of directors of U.S. Fund for UNICEF and Atlanta Federal Reserve Board. Ms. Smith served as a member of the board of directors and audit committee member of Staples, Inc. from September 2008 to June 2014. Ms. Smith holds a bachelors degree, Phi Beta Kappa, from the University of Virginia and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience: experience in strategy, brands, marketing and sales, as well as corporate finance and financial reporting developed in her executive level roles where her responsibilities have included direct financial oversight of multinational companies with multiple business units. |
Douglas M. Steenland
|
Douglas M. Steenland, 67, has served as a director of Hilton since 2009. Mr. Steenland worked for Northwest Airlines Corporation from September 1991 to October 2008, serving as Chief Executive Officer from April 2004 to October 2008 and as President from February 2001 to April 2004. During his tenure at Northwest Airlines, he also served as Executive Vice President, Chief Corporate Officer and Senior Vice President and General Counsel. Mr. Steenland retired from Northwest Airlines upon its merger with Delta Air Lines, Inc. Prior to his time at Northwest Airlines, Mr. Steenland was a senior partner at a Washington, D.C. law firm that is now part of DLA Piper. Mr. Steenland is currently chairman of the board of directors of American International Group, Inc. and chairman of the board of directors of Travelport Worldwide Limited, where he also serves on the nominating and corporate governance committee. In the past five years, Mr. Steenland served as a director of Performance Food Group Company, Digital River, Inc. and Chrysler Group LLC. Mr. Steenland received a B.A. from Calvin College and is a graduate from The George Washington University Law School.
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience: experience in managing large, complex, international institutions generally and experience as a member of global public company boards and an executive in the travel and hospitality industries in particular. |
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
4 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Our Board manages or directs our business and affairs, as provided by Delaware law, and conducts its business through meetings of the Board and three standing committees: the Audit Committee; the Compensation Committee; and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our Board has a majority of independent directors, and all of our Boards committees are fully independent.
We have structured our corporate governance in a manner we believe closely aligns our interests with those of our stockholders. Notable features of our corporate governance include:
· | a single class of voting stock; |
· | annual election of directors; |
· | a majority voting standard for directors in uncontested elections; |
· | a lead independent director; |
· | a proxy access by-law; |
· | regular executive sessions of independent directors; |
· | regular Board and committee evaluations led by our lead independent director; |
· | no stockholder rights plan; and if our Board were ever to adopt a stockholder rights plan in the future without prior stockholder approval, we would either submit the plan to stockholders for ratification or cause the rights plan to expire within one year; and |
· | a range of other corporate governance best practices, including limits on the number of directorships held by our directors to prevent overboarding, stock ownership guidelines for our executives and directors, a robust director education program, rotation of committee members, a commitment to Board refreshment and diversity, and an extensive director nominee selection process. |
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE AND INDEPENDENCE DETERMINATIONS
Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and NYSE rules, a director is not independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that he or she does not have a direct or indirect material relationship with us or any of our subsidiaries. In addition, the director must meet the bright-line tests for independence set forth by the NYSE rules.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines define independence in accordance with the independence definition in the current NYSE corporate governance rules for listed companies. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require the Board to review the independence of all directors at least annually.
In the event a director has a relationship with the Company that is relevant to his or her independence and is not addressed by the objective tests set forth in the NYSE independence definition, the Board will determine, considering all relevant facts and circumstances, whether that relationship is material.
Our Board has affirmatively determined that each of Ms. Begley, Ms. Healey, Mr. Mabus, Ms. McHale, Mr. Schreiber, Ms. Smith and Mr. Steenland is independent under the guidelines for director independence set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and under all applicable NYSE guidelines, including with respect to committee membership. Our Board also has determined that each of Ms. Begley, Mr. Mabus, and Mr. Steenland is independent for purposes of Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
In making its independence determinations, the Board considered and reviewed all information known to it (including information identified through annual directors questionnaires).
Our Board of Directors is led by Mr. Steenland, our lead independent director, and Mr. Gray, our Non-Executive Chairman. The Chief Executive Officer position is separate from the Chairman position. Although we believe that the separation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions is appropriate corporate governance for us at this time, our Board believes that the Company and stockholders are best served by maintaining flexibility to determine whether and when the Chairperson and CEO positions should be separate or combined to provide the appropriate leadership. Responsibilities of our lead independent director include serving as a liaison between the Chief Executive Officer and independent and non-management directors, advising as to the scope and production of Board materials, managing our Boards self-evaluation process, providing input on meeting agendas, chairing executive sessions of independent directors, monitoring communications between stockholders and our board, and consulting on corporate governance matters. Our Board appointed a new Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair in November 2017 and new Audit and Compensation Committee chairs in 2018 as part of a practice to refresh committee leadership from time to time.
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 5 |
The following table summarizes the current membership of each of the Boards standing committees.
Name
|
Audit Committee
|
Compensation Committee
|
Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee | |||
Christopher J. Nassetta
|
||||||
Jonathan D. Gray
|
||||||
Charlene T. Begley
|
Chair
|
X
| ||||
Melanie L. Healey
|
X
|
|||||
Raymond E. Mabus, Jr.
|
X
|
|||||
Judith A. McHale
|
Chair
|
|||||
John G. Schreiber
|
X
|
|||||
Elizabeth A. Smith
|
Chair
| |||||
Douglas M. Steenland
|
X
|
X
|
We expect all directors to attend all meetings of the Board, meetings of the committees of which they are members and the annual meeting of stockholders. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Board held four meetings, the Audit Committee held nine meetings, the Compensation Committee held four meetings and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held five meetings. In 2018, all of our director nominees attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served as a member. We expect all directors to attend any meeting of stockholders. All of our directors attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
All members of the Audit Committee have been determined to be independent, as defined by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards applicable to boards of directors generally and audit committees in particular. Our Board also has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is financially literate within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, our Board has determined that each of Ms. Begley and Mr. Steenland qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined by applicable SEC regulations.
The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.ir.hilton.com under Investors: Corporate Governance: Governance Documents: Audit Committee Charter, and include among others:
· | assisting the Board with its oversight of our accounting and financial reporting process and financial statement audits; |
· | assisting the Board with its oversight of our disclosure controls procedures and our internal control over financial reporting; |
· | assessing the independent registered public accounting firms qualifications and independence; |
· | engaging the independent registered public accounting firm; |
· | overseeing the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm; |
· | assisting with our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements in connection with the foregoing; |
· | overseeing our exposure to risk, including, but not limited to, data privacy and security, business continuity and operational risks; |
· | reviewing related party transactions; and |
· | overseeing compliance with our Code of Conduct. |
With respect to our reporting and disclosure matters, the responsibilities and duties of the Audit Committee include reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements prior to inclusion in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or other public filings in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.
On behalf of the Board, the Audit Committee plays a key role in the oversight of our risk management policies and procedures. See Oversight of Risk Management below.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
All members of the Compensation Committee have been determined to be independent as defined by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards applicable to boards of directors generally, and compensation committees in particular. In addition, all members qualify as non-employee directors for purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act and as outside directors for purposes of Section 162(m) (Section 162(m)) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Internal Revenue Code).
6 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
The duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.ir.hilton.com under Investors: Corporate Governance: Governance Documents: Compensation Committee Charter, and include among others:
· | establishing, maintaining and administering compensation and benefit policies designed to attract, motivate and retain personnel with the requisite skills and abilities to contribute to our long term success; |
· | overseeing the goals, objectives and compensation of our President and Chief Executive Officer, including evaluating the performance of the President and Chief Executive Officer in light of those goals; |
· | overseeing the goals, objectives and compensation of our other executives and directors; |
· | assisting with our compliance with the compensation rules, regulations and guidelines promulgated by the NYSE, the SEC and other law, as applicable; and |
· | issuing a report on executive compensation for inclusion in our annual proxy statement and annual report. |
With respect to our reporting and disclosure matters, the responsibilities and duties of the Compensation Committee include overseeing the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for inclusion in our annual proxy statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The charter of the Compensation Committee permits the committee to delegate any or all of its authority to one or more subcommittees and to delegate to one or more of our officers the authority to make awards to employees other than any Section 16 officer under our incentive compensation or other equity-based plan, subject to compliance with the plan and the laws of our state of jurisdiction.
The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to retain outside consultants or advisors, as it deems necessary or advisable. In accordance with this authority, the Compensation Committee has engaged the services of Exequity LLP (Exequity) as its independent outside compensation consultant since 2012. All executive compensation services provided by Exequity were conducted under the direction or authority of the Compensation Committee, and all work performed by Exequity was pre-approved by the Compensation Committee. Neither Exequity nor any of its affiliates maintains any other direct or indirect business relationships with us or any of our subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee evaluated whether any work provided by Exequity raised any conflict of interest for services performed during 2018 and determined that it did not.
As requested by the Compensation Committee, in 2018, Exequitys services to the Compensation Committee included, among other things, providing perspective on current trends and developments in executive and director compensation as well as analysis of benchmarking data and confirmation of our peer group composition.
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have been determined to be independent as defined by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards.
The duties and responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.ir.hilton.com under Investors: Corporate Governance: Governance Documents: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and include among others:
· | advising the Board concerning the appropriate composition and qualifications of the Board and its committees, and its leadership structure; |
· | identifying individuals qualified to become Board members; |
· | recommending to the Board the persons to be nominated by the Board for election as directors at any meeting of stockholders; |
· | recommending to the Board the members of the Board to serve on the various committees; |
· | developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines and assisting the Board in complying with them; and |
· | overseeing the evaluation of the Board and the Boards committees. |
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for risk oversight, including, as part of regular Board and committee meetings, general oversight of executives management of risks relevant to the Company. A fundamental part of risk oversight is not only understanding the material risks a company faces and the steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for the Company. The involvement of the Board of Directors in reviewing our business strategy is an integral aspect of the Boards assessment of managements tolerance for risk and its determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for the Company. While the full Board has overall responsibility for risk oversight, it is supported in this function by its Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of the committees regularly reports to the Board.
The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its risk oversight responsibilities by periodically reviewing our accounting, reporting and financial practices, including the integrity of our financial statements, the surveillance of administrative and financial controls, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and our enterprise risk management program. Through its regular
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 7 |
meetings with management, including the finance, legal, internal audit, tax, compliance, and information technology functions, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses all significant areas of our business and summarizes for the Board all areas of risk and the appropriate mitigating factors. The Audit Committee assists the Board in monitoring cybersecurity risk by receiving quarterly reports from our information technology team that cover, among other things, our information security framework, threat assessment, response readiness, and training efforts. The Compensation Committee assists the Board by overseeing and evaluating risks related to the Companys compensation structure and compensation programs, including the formulation, administration and regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters, and coordinating, along with the Boards Chair, succession planning discussions. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board by overseeing and evaluating programs and risks associated with Board organization, membership and structure, and corporate governance. In addition, our Board receives periodic detailed operating performance reviews from management. Our chief risk officer updates the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis and the full Board on an annual basis and as needed.
Executive sessions, which are meetings of the non-management members of the Board, are regularly scheduled throughout the year. In addition, at least once a year, the independent directors meet in a private session that excludes management. Our lead independent director presides at these sessions.
BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS
The Board and its committees conduct annual self-evaluations to assess the effectiveness of the Board and committees. The self-assessments focus on the Boards and each committees and their respective members performance and contribution to the Company as well as provide constructive feedback.
COMMITTEE CHARTERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
Our commitment to good corporate governance is reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which describe the Boards views on a wide range of governance topics. These Corporate Governance Guidelines and committee charters are reviewed from time to time by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and, to the extent deemed appropriate in light of emerging practices, revised accordingly, upon recommendation to and approval by the Board.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charters and other corporate governance information are available on the Corporate Governance page of the Investors section on our website at www.ir.hilton.com. Any stockholder also may request them in print, without charge, by contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary at Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., 7930 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 1100, McLean, Virginia 22102.
We maintain a Code of Conduct that is applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and other senior financial officers. The Code of Conduct sets forth our policies and expectations on a number of topics, including conflicts of interest, compliance with laws, human rights, use of our assets and business conduct and fair dealing. This Code of Conduct also satisfies the requirements for a code of ethics, as defined by Item 406 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. We will, if required, disclose within four business days any substantive changes in or waivers of the Code of Conduct granted to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on our website as set forth above rather than by filing a Form 8-K. In the case of a waiver for an executive officer or a director, the required disclosure also will be made available on our website within four business days of the date of such waiver.
The Code of Conduct may be found on our website at www.ir.hilton.com under Investors: Corporate Governance: Governance Documents: Code of Conduct.
Our Board receives periodic updates from management on the Companys corporate responsibility strategy and initiatives. Travel with Purpose, our corporate responsibility strategy, is our commitment to drive responsible travel and tourism globally. We consistently review and build on our robust commitments to economic opportunity, environmental stewardship, and community resiliency. Our Travel with Purpose 2030 goals, announced during 2018, are to double our investment in social impact and cut our environmental footprint in half by 2030. These goals include 23 targets encompassing the Companys operations, communities and supply chain.
We are committed to reducing our environmental footprint through energy and carbon management, water stewardship, waste reduction and responsible sourcing and to doubling our investment in social impact through creating economic opportunities, spurring local investment, respecting human rights and providing disaster relief. To those ends, we invested in various initiatives in 2018, including:
· | becoming the first major hotel brand to set science-based carbon reduction targets; |
· | implementing a food waste reduction program to encourage all managed hotels to reduce the amount of food being wasted by donating edible food to the needy in local communities and diverting remaining food waste from landfills through composting and other means; |
· | expanding our existing soap recycling program to 2,500 hotels as part of our commitment to sending zero soap to landfill; |
8 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
· | announcing initial investment of $1 million to drive sustainable travel and tourism in Africa; |
· | connecting, preparing or employing more than 900,000 young people through our Open Doors Pledge; |
· | supporting 3,000+ women-, minority-, Veteran-, and LGBTQ-owned business through our award-winning Supplier Diversity Program; |
· | volunteering more than 235,000 hours across 93 countries during Global Week of Service and dedicating $3 million in support to Disaster Relief (to date); |
· | diverting over 2 million pounds of soap and plastic bottles from waste; |
· | launching a brand standard to remove plastic straws, stir sticks and cocktail picks from all hotel operations; and |
· | maintaining what we believe is the largest certified building portfolio in the world, with all hotels globally certified to ISO 9001 (Quality Management), ISO 14001 (Environmental Management) and ISO 50001 (Energy Management) standards. |
LightStay, our proprietary corporate responsibility performance measurement platform, is a global brand standard that allows us to manage the impact of our hotels on the environment and global community. LightStay helps us to measure, analyze and improve our use of natural resources, the opportunities we create, and our community service. In 2018 and for the second year in a row, Hilton was named to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index North America as an industry leader across economic, social and environmental criteria, and a Top-50 company for diversity by DiversityInc. We also were recognized as the Most JUST Company in our industry on Americas Top 100 Most JUST companies by Forbes. In February 2019, Hilton was named one of the Worlds Most Ethical Companies by The Ethisphere Institute for the second year in a row.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee weighs the characteristics, experience, independence and skills of potential candidates for election to the Board and recommends nominees for director to the Board for election. In considering candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also assesses the size, composition and combined expertise of the Board. As the application of these factors involves the exercise of judgment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a standard set of fixed qualifications that is applicable to all director candidates. At a minimum, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses each candidates strength of character, judgment, industry knowledge or experience, his or her ability to work collegially with the other members of the Board and his or her ability to satisfy any applicable legal requirements or listing standards. In addition, although the Board considers diversity of viewpoints, background and experiences, the Board does not have a formal diversity policy. In identifying prospective director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may seek referrals from other members of the Board, management, stockholders and other sources, including third party recommendations. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also may, but need not, retain a search firm in order to assist it in identifying candidates to serve as directors of the Company The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses the same criteria for evaluating candidates regardless of the source of the referral or recommendation. When considering director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks individuals with backgrounds and qualities that, when combined with those of our incumbent directors, provide a blend of skills and experience to further enhance the Boards effectiveness.
In connection with its annual recommendation of a slate of nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also may assess the contributions of those directors recommended for re-election in the context of the Board evaluation process and other perceived needs of the Board. When considering whether the directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of our business and structure, the Board focused primarily on the information discussed in each board members biographical information set forth above. We believe that our directors provide an appropriate mix of experience and skills relevant to the size and nature of our business. This process resulted in the Boards nomination of the incumbent directors named in this Proxy Statement and proposed for election by you at the upcoming Annual Meeting.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates nominated by stockholders. Our by-laws allow a single stockholder, or group of up to 20 stockholders, owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years as of the date of nomination to nominate and include in our proxy statement director nominees constituting up to the greater of two individuals and 20% of the number of directors then serving, provided the stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our by-laws, including that notice of a nomination be provided to our Secretary at the address below not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting. A non-proxy access director nomination must notify our Secretary in writing not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting. Any nomination submitted to our Secretary should be in writing, satisfy the requirements contained in our by-laws, and include any necessary supporting material in support of the nomination, but must include information that would be required under the rules of the SEC to be included in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such candidate and a written consent of the candidate to serve as one of our directors if elected. The address to submit a nomination is: Office of the Corporate Secretary, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., 7930 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 1100, McLean, Virginia 22102. All nominations received by our Secretary that satisfy our by-law requirements relating to director nominations will be presented to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration. Stockholders also must satisfy the notification, timeliness, consent and information requirements set forth above and in our by-laws. These requirements also are described under the caption Stockholder Proposals for the 2020 Annual Meeting.
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 9 |
As described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with a member or members of the Board, including the chairperson of the Audit, Compensation, or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees, or to the non-management or independent directors as a group, may do so by addressing such communications or concerns to the Office of the Corporate Secretary, 7930 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 1100, McLean, Virginia 22102, who will forward such communication to the appropriate party.
10 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
We use a combination of cash and equity-based compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our Board. Our employee and non-independent directors received no compensation for serving on the Board during 2018.
Each independent director was entitled to annual compensation for the period from our 2018 annual meeting until our 2019 annual meeting, as shown in the table below. As part of its periodic review of the annual director compensation program, the Board approved the following changes in 2018: in addition to the regular annual cash retainer for Board members, to provide the lead independent director an additional annual cash retainer of $75,000; to increase the amount of the annual equity award for Board members by $10,000; to increase the amount of the audit and compensation committee chair retainers by $5,000; to increase the amount of the audit committee member retainer by $7,500; and to increase the amount of each of the compensation and nominating and corporate governance committee member retainers by $2,500. The Board determined, with input from its independent outside compensation consultant, to make adjustments to the annual equity award and cash retainers in order to better align the independent directors compensation with the Companys peers and the market generally.
Pay Element |
Retainer Amount (1)(2) | ||||
Board Annual Equity |
$ | 160,000 | |||
Board Annual Cash |
$ | 95,000 | |||
Lead Independent Director |
$ | 75,000 | |||
Committee Chair Audit |
$ | 30,000 | |||
Committee Chair Compensation |
$ | 25,000 | |||
Committee Chair Nominating and Corporate Governance |
$ | 20,000 | |||
Other Committee Members Audit |
$ | 15,000 | |||
Other Committee Members Compensation; Nominating and Corporate Governance |
$ | 10,000 |
(1) | All of our directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel and related expenses associated with attendance at Board or committee meetings. In addition, our independent directors are reimbursed for reasonable personal hotel costs when they stay at Company-branded hotels; similar lifetime benefits are available to independent directors who retire from the Board with at least seven years of service. |
(2) | Cash compensation is payable on a semi-annual basis. |
Equity awards are granted to our independent directors annually upon his or her election or reelection at our annual meeting of stockholders. The 2018 annual equity award was $160,000 and delivered in the form of deferred share units (DSUs), where the number of DSUs awarded is equal to $160,000 divided by the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The equity currently held by our directors was awarded under the Hilton 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2017 Incentive Plan) and, prior to its adoption, the Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2013 Incentive Plan and, together with the 2017 Incentive Plan, the Incentive Plans) and the material terms thereof are outlined in the table below.
Annual Equity |
Vesting | Dividend Equivalents | Termination or Change in Control | |||
DSUs Granted annually since 2015 |
Fully vested at the time of grant and settle in shares of common stock upon the earlier of termination of service for any reason or a change in control |
Accrue in the form of additional DSUs in an amount equal to the fair market value of the dividend payment as of the dividend payment date, payable at settlement |
Immediately settle |
In addition to the three above-referenced standing Board committees, in 2018, the Board established a special committee to review and provide oversight of specific transactions related to the investment by HNA Tourism Group Co., Ltd. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, HNA) in the Company. The members of the special committee were Ms. Begley, Ms. McHale and Mr. Steenland. Each member earned a $10,000 cash retainer plus a $500 cash payment for each meeting attended or workday spent addressing these transactions. During 2018, the special committee met four times.
We have a stock ownership policy for our non-employee directors. Each of our independent directors is required to own our stock in an amount equal to five times his or her regular annual cash retainer. Each independent director, other than the directors appointed to the Board in 2017, currently satisfies the stock ownership requirement. For purposes of this requirement, a directors holdings include shares held directly or indirectly, individually or jointly, shares underlying vested options and shares held under a deferral or similar plan. Independent directors are expected to meet this ownership requirement within five years from the later of (1) December 11, 2013 and (2) the date he or she first becomes subject to the stock ownership policy.
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 11 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR 2018
The table below sets forth information regarding non-employee director compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
Name |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) |
Stock Awards (1) ($) |
All Other Compensation (2) ($) |
Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||
Charlene T. Begley |
$ | 134,500 | $ | 159,975 | $ | 10,841 | $ | 305,316 | ||||||||||||
Jonathan D. Gray |
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Melanie L. Healey |
$ | 103,750 | $ | 159,975 | | $ | 263,725 | |||||||||||||
Raymond E. Mabus, Jr. |
$ | 106,250 | $ | 159,975 | $ | 11,788 | $ | 278,013 | ||||||||||||
Judith A. McHale |
$ | 127,000 | $ | 159,975 | | $ | 286,975 | |||||||||||||
John G. Schreiber |
$ | 110,000 | $ | 159,975 | | $ | 269,975 | |||||||||||||
Elizabeth A. Smith |
$ | 115,000 | $ | 159,975 | | $ | 274,975 | |||||||||||||
Douglas M. Steenland |
$ | 173,250 | $ | 159,975 | | $ | 333,225 | |||||||||||||
Zhang Ling (3) |
| | | |
(1) | Represents the grant date fair value of DSUs computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, without taking into account estimated forfeitures, based on the closing price on the NYSE of our common stock on the grant date. Each eligible non-employee director was granted 1,933 DSUs on May 10, 2018, representing the directors annual equity award for the annual period from the 2018 annual meeting to the 2019 annual meeting. In accordance with the SECs rules, dividend equivalents that accrued on the directors 2018 DSU awards are not reported above because dividends were factored into the grant date fair value of these awards. |
For details regarding the directors beneficial ownership of equity securities, including their outstanding DSUs, see Ownership of Securities. |
(2) | Company-paid expenses incurred at Company-branded hotels while on personal travel. |
(3) | Mr. Zhang resigned from the Board in 2018. |
12 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
Set forth below is certain information regarding each of our current executive officers as of March 1, 2019, other than Mr. Nassetta, whose biographical information is presented under Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors in 2019.
Kristin A. Campbell
Kristin A. Campbell, 57, joined Hilton as Executive Vice President and General Counsel in June 2011. She is responsible for leading Hiltons global legal and compliance functions. Ms. Campbell also is a director of Office Depot, Inc., chair of its corporate governance and nominating committee and a member of its compensation committee. Prior to Hilton, Ms. Campbell was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Staples, Inc., an international office products company from May 2007 to June 2011. Before joining Staples, Inc. in 1993, Ms. Campbell worked at the law firms Goodwin Procter LLP and Rackemann, Sawyer & Brewster. Ms. Campbell graduated summa cum laude from Arizona State University and received a J.D. from Cornell University Law School.
Ian R. Carter
Ian R. Carter, 57, has served as Executive Vice President and President, Global Development for Hilton since October 2012 and previously oversaw Operations for Hilton since August 2009. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Hilton International Co. prior to its re-acquisition by Hilton in February 2006. Prior to joining Hilton International in January 2005, Mr. Carter served as Officer and President of Black & Decker Corporation, Middle East, Africa and Asia. Prior to Black & Decker, Mr. Carter spent more than a decade with General Electric Plastics, ultimately serving as President of General Electric Specialty Chemical. Mr. Carter serves as a non-Executive Director on the Board of Burberry Group plc, and is President of the Dame Maureen Thomas Foundation for Young People. He serves as Vice Chairman of the board of advisors of the Boston University School of Hospitality Administration and on the board of directors of Visit Florida. Mr. Carter is non-executive chairman of the board of Del Friscos Restaurant Group, Inc. Mr. Carter is a graduate of the University of West London, School of Business and Management, and received an honorary doctorate from the university.
Kevin J. Jacobs
Kevin J. Jacobs, 46, is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hilton, and oversees all of the Companys finance and real estate functions. He joined Hilton in 2008 as Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy; was elected Treasurer in 2009; was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief of Staff in 2012; and assumed his current role in 2013. Previously, he was Senior Vice President, Mergers & Acquisitions and Treasurer of Fairmont Raffles Hotels International. Prior to joining Fairmont Raffles, Mr. Jacobs spent seven years with Host Hotels and Resorts, Inc., most recently as Vice President, Corporate Finance & Investor Relations, preceded by various roles at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. Mr. Jacobs is a member of the Deans Advisory Board of the Cornell University School of Hotel Administration, a member of the Hotel Development Council of the Urban Land Institute, a Trustee and member of the Executive Committee of the Federal City Council, and serves on the board of directors of Goodwill of Greater Washington. He is a graduate of the Cornell University School of Hotel Administration.
Matthew W. Schuyler
Matthew W. Schuyler, 53, has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since June 2009 and leads the Companys global human resources organization. Mr. Schuyler was previously Chief Human Resources Officer at Capital One Financial Corporation from April 2002 to June 2009. Prior to Capital One, Mr. Schuyler served as Senior Vice President of Human Resources with Cisco Systems, Inc. and as a Partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers in the Global Human Resources Group. He serves as the Vice-Chair of the Penn State University Board of Trustees. Mr. Schuyler holds a B.S. from Penn State University and an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan.
Christopher W. Silcock
Christopher W. Silcock, 47, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer since September 2015 and oversees Pricing and Revenue Management, Sales, Distribution and Enterprise Data and Analytics. Mr. Silcock previously served as our Head of Sales and Revenue Management from September 2014 and Senior Vice President Revenue Management and Online from January 2013. Prior to that he was Senior Vice President Revenue Management since March 2009. Mr. Silcock holds a bachelors of science degree in Computer Studies from University of Essex and studied music prior to his hospitality career.
Jonathan W. Witter
Jonathan W. Witter, 49, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer since April 2017. From February 2012 to March 2017, Mr. Witter was President, Retail and Direct Banking of Capital One Financial Corporation. Mr. Witter joined Capital One in December 2010 as an Executive Vice President in Retail Banking. From September 2011 until February 2012, Mr. Witter served as President, Retail and Small Business Banking. Mr. Witter also was a director of ING Bank, fsb. from February 2012 to November 2012. Prior to joining Capital One, Mr. Witter held various positions, including executive vice president and head of general Bank Distribution at Wachovia (now Wells Fargo & Company), managing director and president of Morgan Stanley Private Bank NA, a global financial services firm, and Chief Operating Officer of Morgan Stanleys Retail Banking Group.
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 13 |
PROPOSAL NO. 2 APPROVAL OF EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Our Compensation Committee and Board have unanimously approved the Hilton 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP), subject to stockholder approval. The following sections summarize the material terms of the ESPP. These sections are qualified in their entirety by the full text of the ESPP, which is included as Annex B to this Proxy Statement.
Purpose. The ESPP is intended to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), and permits participants to be eligible to receive favorable tax treatment of shares acquired under the ESPP, as described below (such offerings, Section 423 Offerings). However, the Committee may also authorize offerings under the ESPP that are not intended to comply with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code.
Effective Date. If approved by stockholders, the ESPP will become effective on May 9, 2019. The term of the ESPP will continue until terminated by the Board or the date that all shares available for issuance under the ESPP have been issued.
Administration. The ESPP will be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board unless the Board elects to administer the ESPP. For the purposes of this summary, references to the Committee include the Compensation Committee and the Board as well as any administrator, including Hilton management, to which the Committee has delegated any of its responsibilities and powers. The Committee may appoint one or more agents to assist in the administration of the ESPP and may delegate certain responsibilities or powers subject to ESPP terms and applicable law. Subject to the ESPP terms and applicable law, the Committee has the full and final authority to construe and interpret the ESPP and adopt rules and regulations for the administration of the ESPP as the Committee deems appropriate. The Committee may also adopt sub-plans relating to the operation and administration of the ESPP to accommodate specific requirements of local laws and procedures for non-U.S. jurisdictions that will not be required to comply with Section 423 of the Code to the extent they are inconsistent with the requirements of those regulations, the terms of which may take precedence over the terms of the ESPP.
Shares Reserved for the ESPP. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the ESPP may not exceed 4,000,000 shares. The number of shares issuable under the ESPP and the terms of purchase rights to acquire such shares are subject to adjustment in connection with certain corporate and recapitalization events as described in the ESPP. If a purchase right expires or is terminated, surrendered or canceled without being purchased, in whole or in part, the number of shares subject to the purchase right will again be available for grant under the ESPP.
ESPP Provisions. A participant may acquire common stock under the ESPP by authorizing payroll contributions to purchase shares of common stock. Contributions must be at a rate of between 1% and 15% (in whole percentages only) of the participants total compensation (including base salary, wages, bonuses, commissions and other forms of incentive compensation, paid tips (other than cash tips), gratuities and service charges but excluding gifts, prizes, awards, relocation payments or similar elements of compensation). A participant may not make separate cash payments into his or her account except as required by applicable law. All contributions made by a participant will be credited (without interest) to his or her account. A participant may withdraw contributions credited to his or her account during a purchase period at any time before the applicable purchase period end date. A participant may discontinue plan participation as provided in the ESPP, but no other change may be made during a purchase period except (i) a participant may reduce the amount of contributions one time during a purchase period and (ii) a participants contribution election may be decreased to 0% at any time during a purchase period to the extent necessary to comply with Section 423 of the Code or the terms of the ESPP.
The ESPP provides for two six-month purchase periods in each calendar year unless otherwise determined by the Committee. The first purchase period during a calendar year will generally begin on May 1 and end on October 31 of that year. The second purchase period in a calendar year will generally begin on November 1 and end on April 30 of the following year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the first purchase period after the effective date of the ESPP will begin and end on dates determined by the Committee in its discretion. The Committee has the authority to change the duration of a purchase period (including the start and end date); provided that the change is announced a reasonable period of time prior to its effective date and the purchase period is not greater than 27 months.
On the first day of a purchase period, a participant will be granted a purchase right to purchase shares of common stock at the applicable purchase price. Subject to the limit below, the number of shares of common stock is determined by dividing the amount of the participants contributions accumulated as of the last day of the purchase period by the applicable purchase price; provided that (a) no participant may purchase shares of common stock with a fair market value (as of the date of purchase right grant) in excess of $25,000 per calendar year; and (b) in no event will the aggregate number of shares subject to purchase rights during a purchase period exceed the number of shares then available under the ESPP or the maximum number of shares available for any single purchase period (as described below). The number of shares of our common stock that may be purchased by all participants in any particular purchase period is limited to 500,000 shares (subject to adjustment as provided in the ESPP), and the maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be purchased by any participant during any purchase period is limited to 1,500 shares. The Committee may modify this limit from time to time by resolution or otherwise. The number of shares subject to purchase rights will be adjusted as necessary to conform to the above limitations.
14 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
The purchase price will be 85% (or such greater percentage as determined by the Committee prior to the commencement of any purchase period) of the lesser of (i) fair market value per share of our common stock as determined on the purchase period end date or (ii) fair market value per share of our common stock as determined on the purchase period start date (provided that, in no event may the purchase price be less than the par value per share of our common stock).
A participants right to purchase shares of common stock during a purchase period will occur automatically on the purchase period end date unless the participant withdraws or his or her participation is terminated. Subject to the terms of the ESPP, a purchase right will generally terminate on the earlier of the date of the participants termination of employment or the last day of the applicable purchase period. Purchase rights are not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.
Amendment; Termination. The ESPP may be amended, altered, suspended and/or terminated at any time by the Board, except that approval of an amendment to the ESPP by our stockholders will be required to the extent that stockholder approval of such amendment is required by applicable law. The Committee may (subject to the provisions of Section 423 of the Code for Section 423 Offerings and the ESPP) amend, alter, suspend and/or terminate any purchase right granted under the ESPP, but (except as otherwise provided in the ESPP) such amendment, alteration, suspension or termination of a purchase right may not, without the written consent of a participant, materially adversely affect the rights of the participant with respect to the purchase right. In addition, the Committee is authorized to amend the ESPP and any purchase right to the extent necessary to comply with applicable law and to make adjustments to purchase rights in recognition of certain unusual or nonrecurring events affecting us or any parent or subsidiary or our financial statements (or those of any parent or subsidiary) or changes in applicable law or accounting principles.
Eligible Participants. Purchase rights may only be granted to eligible employees of a designated company (as defined below). Generally, any eligible employee who has completed 90 days employment and who is employed on the date his or her participation is to become effective is eligible to enroll as a participant in the ESPP for any purchase periods that start on or after the 90-day period has concluded. An eligible employee is any employee of a designated company except for (i) any employee who is a Section 16(a) officer and/or is subject to disclosure requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (ii) any employee who has been employed for less than 90 days or (iii) any employee whose customary employment is for not more than five months in any calendar year. Eligible employees who are citizens or residents of a foreign jurisdiction may be excluded from the ESPP or an offering if the grant of a purchase right would be prohibited by applicable law or would cause the ESPP or offering to violate the requirements of Section 423 of the Code. However, no employee will be eligible to participate if, immediately after the purchase right grant, the employee would own stock (including any stock the employee may purchase under outstanding purchase rights) representing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of our common stock. A designated company is Hilton or any subsidiary or affiliate of Hilton, whether now existing or existing in the future, that has been designated by the Committee from time to time in its sole discretion as eligible to participate in the ESPP; provided that only Hilton and its corporate subsidiaries may be designated companies for Section 423 Offerings. The Committee has not yet determined which subsidiaries or affiliates will be designated companies for purposes of the ESPP and, accordingly, we are unable to estimate the number of potential participants in the ESPP at this time.
Effect of a Change in Control; Adjustments. If there is any change in the outstanding shares of our common stock because of a merger, change in control, consolidation, recapitalization or reorganization involving Hilton, or if the Board declares a stock dividend, stock split distributable in shares of common stock or reverse stock split, other distribution or combination or reclassification of our common stock, or if there is a similar change in the capital stock structure of Hilton affecting our common stock, then the number and type of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the ESPP will be correspondingly adjusted and, subject to applicable law, the Committee will make such adjustments to purchase rights or to any ESPP provision as the Committee deems equitable to prevent dilution or enlargement of purchase rights or as may otherwise be advisable. In addition, in the event of a change in control, the Committees discretion includes, but is not limited to, the authority to provide for any of, or a combination of any of, the following:
· | assumption or substitution of purchase rights by a successor entity; |
· | selection of a date on which all outstanding purchase rights will be exercised on or before the consummation date of the change in control; |
· | termination of outstanding purchase rights and refund of accumulated contributions to each participant prior to the change in control; or |
· | continuation of outstanding purchase rights unchanged. |
Plan Benefits. Benefits under the ESPP will depend on participants elections to participate and the fair market value of our common stock at various future dates. As a result, it is not possible as of the date of this summary to determine future benefits that will be received by executive officers and other employees; provided that, as noted above, employees who are Section 16(a) officers are ineligible to participate in the ESPP. Each participant is limited to the $25,000 annual purchase restriction as well as the participant and purchase period restrictions described above.
The following summary generally describes the principal U.S. federal (and not state, foreign or local) income tax consequences under the ESPP to Hilton and participating employees as of the date of this proxy statement. The summary is general in nature and
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 15 |
is not intended to cover all the tax consequences that may apply to a particular employee or Hilton. The provisions of the Code and related regulations concerning these matters are complicated, and their impact in any one case may depend upon the particular circumstances.
As noted above, the ESPP is intended to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan within the meaning of Section 423 of the Code. Under Section 423 of the Code, an employee who elects to participate in the ESPP will not recognize income and Hilton will not receive a deduction at the time a purchase right is granted or when the shares purchased under the ESPP are transferred to the participant. Participants will, however, recognize income when they sell or dispose of the shares purchased under the ESPP. If an employee disposes of such shares after two years from the date of grant of the purchase right and after one year from the date of the purchase of such shares (or if the employee dies), the employee will recognize ordinary income for the year in which such disposition occurs (or the employees taxable year ending with his or her death) in an amount equal to the lesser of:
· | the excess of the fair market value of such shares at the time of disposition (or death) over the purchase price; or |
· | the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of the grant of the purchase right over the purchase right price on the date of the purchase right grant. |
Except in the case of the employees death, the employees basis in the shares disposed of will be increased by an amount equal to the amount includable in his or her income as ordinary income. Any additional gain or loss will be a long-term capital gain or loss. Hilton will not be entitled to a tax deduction when the shares are disposed of after the expiration of the two-year and one-year periods.
If an employee disposes of the shares purchased under the ESPP within such two-year or one-year periods, the employee will recognize ordinary income for the year in which such disposition occurs in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of such shares on the date of purchase over the purchase price. The employees basis in such shares disposed of will be increased by an amount equal to the amount includable in his or her income as ordinary income, and any gain or loss computed with reference to such adjusted basis that is recognized at the time of disposition will be a capital gain or loss, either short-term or long-term, depending on the holding period for such shares. In the event of a disposition within such two-year or one-year periods, Hilton will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount the employee is required to include as ordinary income as a result of such disposition to the extent the amount represents reasonable compensation and an ordinary and necessary business expense, subject to any required income tax reporting.
The Committee may authorize offerings that are not intended to comply with Section 423 of the Code, in which case different tax consequences will apply. Upon the purchase of shares under the ESPP, the employee will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of such shares on the date of purchase over the purchase price paid by the employee for such shares, and Hilton will be entitled to a corresponding deduction for federal income tax purposes. In addition, upon the disposition of such shares, the employee will recognize a capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the selling price of such shares and the fair market value of such shares on the date of purchase. Hilton will not receive a deduction for federal income tax purposes with respect to any capital gain or loss recognized by the employee.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides certain information about common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans. The only plan pursuant to which the Company may grant new equity-based awards is the 2017 Incentive Plan, which replaced the 2013 Incentive Plan. The number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights reflected in the table below includes shares underlying equity-based awards granted, and that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2018 under the equity incentive plans.
As of December 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||
Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1) |
Weighted- average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options |
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans | |||||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders |
5,841,514 | $ | 58.50 | 16,113,757 | |||||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders |
| | |
(1) | Includes shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and 3,450,224 shares that may be issued upon the vesting of restricted stock units, shares that may be issued upon the vesting of performance shares and director deferred share units and dividend equivalents accrued thereon. The number of shares to be issued in respect of performance shares has been calculated based on the assumption that the maximum levels of performance applicable to the performance shares will be achieved. The restricted stock units, performance shares and deferred share units cannot be exercised for consideration. |
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE HILTON 2019 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN.
16 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
PROPOSAL NO. 3 RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.
Although ratification is not required by our by-laws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification because we value our stockholders views on the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. If our stockholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered as notice to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The shares represented by your proxy will be voted for the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP unless you specify otherwise.
In connection with the audit of the 2018 financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, we entered into an agreement with Ernst & Young LLP that sets forth the terms by which Ernst & Young LLP will perform audit services for the Company.
The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of our financial statements for 2018 and 2017 and fees billed for other services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for those periods:
2018
|
2017
|
|||||||
Audit Fees:
|
||||||||
Consolidated Audit (1)
|
$
|
5,930,226
|
|
$
|
6,429,580
|
| ||
Statutory and Subsidiary Audits (2)
|
|
3,589,000
|
|
|
3,427,000
|
| ||
|
9,519,226
|
|
|
9,856,580
|
| |||
Audit-related fees (3)
|
|
1,774,224
|
|
|
1,760,592
|
| ||
Tax fees (4)
|
|
1,775,225
|
|
|
4,424,469
|
| ||
All other fees (5)
|
|
18,212
|
|
|
86,098
|
| ||
Total:
|
$
|
13,086,887
|
|
$
|
16,127,739
|
|
(1) | Includes the aggregate fees recognized in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of the Companys annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and the review of financial statements included in SEC filings. The fees are for services that are normally provided by Ernst & Young LLP in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements. |
(2) | Includes the aggregate fees recognized in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP that are reasonably related to the performance of audits related to subsidiaries and statutory reporting required for legal compliance for certain international subsidiaries or requirements of debt or other operating agreements. |
(3) | Includes the aggregate fees recognized in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP that are reasonably related to the performance of the Companys audit. Specifically, these costs include fees for accounting and audit consultation, audits of employee benefit plans, and other attest services. |
(4) | Includes the aggregate fees recognized in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. |
(5) | Represents fees for international legal entity restructuring and accounting research services. |
The Audit Committee considered whether providing the non-audit services shown in this table was compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLPs independence and concluded that it was.
Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence and the Audit Committees charter, the Audit Committee has responsibility for engaging, setting compensation for and reviewing the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm. In exercising this responsibility, the Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the approval of all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by any independent registered public accounting firm prior to each engagement.
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2019.
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 17 |
NON-BINDING VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act (which was added by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) and the related rules of the SEC, we are including in these proxy materials a separate resolution subject to stockholder vote to approve, in a non-binding, advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers as disclosed on pages 36 to 43. While the results of the vote are non-binding and advisory in nature, the Compensation Committee and the Board intend to carefully consider the results of this vote.
The text of the resolution in respect of Proposal No. 4 is as follows:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Companys named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and any related narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.
In considering their vote, stockholders may wish to review with care the information on our compensation policies and decisions regarding the named executive officers presented in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pages 21 to 35, as well as the discussion regarding the Compensation Committee on pages 6 to 7.
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
18 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter that is reviewed annually by the Audit Committee. Additionally, a brief description of the primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement under the discussion of The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters Committee Membership Audit Committee. Under the Audit Committee charter, management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Companys financial statements, the application of accounting and financial reporting principles and our internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing our financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of the Company with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letters from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firms communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence.
Based upon the review and discussions described in the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements of the Company be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC.
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors:
Charlene T. Begley, Chair
Raymond E. Mabus, Jr.
Douglas M. Steenland
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 19 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee has discussed and reviewed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:
Judith A. McHale, Chair
Melanie L. Healey
John G. Schreiber
20 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CD&A)
Our CD&A describes our executive compensation program, compensation for our Named Executive Officers (NEOs) and highlights our strong Company performance. Hilton welcomed approximately 166 million guests at more than 5,600 properties throughout 113 countries and territories in 2018. Our global footprint and scale give us a unique opportunity to create heartfelt experiences for guests, meaningful opportunities for team members, high value for hotel owners and a positive impact in our communities all while generating premium returns for our stockholders.
1) 2018 COMPANY PERFORMANCE | Page 22 |
Net Income $769M
|
Adj. $2,101M
|
Pipeline +6% Year-over-Year (YOY)
|
Development Market Share Nearly 4X Current Share Highest in Industry
|
Net Unit Growth +7% YOY |
Opened >1 Hotel per day |
$1.9B Total Capital Returned to Stockholders |
Launched Industry-Leading Corporate Responsibility Goals |
Ranked #1 Best Companies to Work For #2 Worlds Best Workplace & #1 for Parents & Diversity in the U.S. |
2) HOW WE MAKE PAY DECISIONS | Page 24 |
· Design pay programs to reward for financial performance and specific business results, mitigate material risks and align with stockholder interests by having a significant portion composed of long-term equity-based awards |
|
Voted FOR
| ||
· Set pay levels commensurate with performance and the need to attract and retain high quality talent
· Consider many factors, including the advice of the Compensation Committees (the Committees) consultant, internal pay equity, external market data, Company and individual performance and results of our Say on Pay vote |
2018 SAY ON PAY Approved by stockholders with support level similar to prior years |
3) 2018 NEO PAY DECISIONS | Page 26 |
|
Annual Base Salaries
|
Annual Cash Incentives
|
Annual Long-Term Incentive (LTI)
| |||||||||||
· CEO: No increase
· Other NEOs: Increased by 3% - 4% after considering market practices and increases for our corporate employees |
· Payouts from 112.7% to 131.4% of target
· Awarded based on performance against financial, business area and organizational strength objectives |
· Increased LTI Targets by 3% - 19% for all except the CEO (whose increase is described below) after considering individual performance, market data and internal pay equity
· Payouts granted at target level
· Awarded as a mix of 50% performance awards vesting based on 3-year free cash flow (FCF) per share(2) compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and 3-year EBITDA CAGR, 25% restricted stock units (RSUs) and 25% stock options |
|
Overview
· LTI Target was increased by $9M
· Actual TDC was 103% of $18.96M Target TDC
· Summary Compensation Table (SCT) total was increased by 5%
| |||||
Rationale for Target LTI Increase The Board considered Mr. Nassettas extensive experience in the hospitality industry and performance during his ten-plus year tenure as our CEO, as well as their desire for leadership continuity to promote Hiltons long-term growth. As a result, the Board decided to position Mr. Nassettas pay more competitively relative to our peers by increasing his target TDC opportunity by $9M. The Board did not raise Mr. Nassettas base salary or bonus target, but instead increased his target LTI opportunity the pay element most aligned with stockholder value over the long term.
During the past decade under Mr. Nassettas leadership, Hilton has created significant value for our stockholders, including our IPO in 2013 and the spin-offs of Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. and Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. in 2017. The spin-offs completed Hiltons transformation into a fee-based, capital-efficient business model. In the past three years, our stockholders have seen a total stockholder return (including reinvestment of dividends) of 67%, which is more than double the Standard & Poors (S&P) 500 Index for the same period. Going forward, the Board believes Mr. Nassettas leadership is key to our continued success at the forefront of the hospitality industry. |
4) RISK & GOVERNANCE | Page 34 |
|
No employment agreements or individual change in control agreements
|
|
Limited perquisites
| |||
|
Emphasize long-term performance |
|
Double trigger change in control vesting | |||
|
Good governance practices, with policies on clawbacks, anti-pledging, anti-hedging and stock ownership |
|
Caps on maximum payouts for annual cash incentives and long-term performance awards |
(1) | Please see Annex A for additional information and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to financial measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP. |
(2) | FCF per share is calculated as described under Performance Awards Granted in 2018. |
(3) | TDC includes annual base salary, annual cash incentives and annual LTI. |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 21 |
2018 marks our fourth consecutive year of record-breaking growth while remaining a worlds best workplace and launching bold corporate responsibility goals. We believe the success of our business is directly linked to the success of our communities from the local owners who build our hotels, to the local talent who operate them, to the local businesses we support through the products we source and the guests we serve. Our performance against our key strategic priorities and corporate responsibility strategy, Travel with Purpose, are highlighted on the following two pages.
MAXIMIZED PERFORMANCE
|
|
Net Income of $769M exceeded expectations |
Grew Adjusted EBITDA to $2,101M nearly 103% of target |
Increased system-wide comparable RevPAR(1) 3.0% YoY |
Returned approximately $1.9B TOTAL CAPITAL TO STOCKHOLDERS approximately 9% of our market capitalization |
EXPANDED GLOBAL NETWORK
|
|
We achieved record net unit growth, approvals and construction starts. As of 2018 year-end, we had nearly 20% of hotel rooms under construction globally, nearly 4 times our existing market share, which is the highest multiple in the industry.
IMPROVED OUR CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
|
|
CULTIVATED OUR PURPOSE-LED CULTURE FOR ALL
|
|
Our exceptional workplace culture received record-breaking external recognition. Through our Team Member Value Proposition,
|
Thrive@Hilton, we are committed to evolving the way we work and focusing on Team Member wellbeing. |
(1) | RevPAR stands for Revenue Per Available Room and represents hotel room revenue divided by room nights available for guests. |
22 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
LAUNCHED OUR 2030 TARGETS TO REDEFINE SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL
|
|
Travel with Purpose is Hiltons corporate responsibility strategy to redefine and advance sustainable travel globally. In 2018, we committed to doubling our social impact investment | ||
and cutting our environmental footprint in half by 2030 with our new Travel with Purpose goals. Consumer research reaffirms our strategy according to a survey of 73,000 Hilton guests, social and environmental considerations are central to their purchasing decisions. |
Social Impact |
Environmental Impact | |||||||||||||
Double spending on local, small and minority-owned suppliers, and double investment in opportunity programs for all | Advance Human Rights capabilities in our value chain to eradicate forced labor and trafficking |
1st major hotel company to institute science-based targets to reduce carbon emissions | Expand existing soap recycling to all hotels and send zero soap to landfill |
Our 2030 Targets are aligned to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
|
|
· We launched BIG FIVE to drive sustainable travel and tourism across Africa with an initial investment of $1M
· Hilton CEO elected Chairman of the World Travel & Tourism Council, partnering to elevate sustainable travel and tourism
· Launched the International Tourism Partnerships Goals for youth, water, carbon and human rights
|
ADVANCED OUR SOCIAL IMPACT
|
|
We use our global network of more than 5,600 hotels to advance sustainable and inclusive growth for all.
REDUCED OUR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
|
|
We are working to reduce our environmental impact across our value chain to preserve our planet for future generations.
Please visit us at https://cr.hilton.com/our-reporting/ to learn more about all our environmental, social and governance (ESG) efforts.
The contents of our website are not part of this Proxy Statement. |
For more information on our governance, please see pages 5-10 within this Proxy Statement. |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 23 |
Compensation Committee |
|
· With input from our Board and its independent compensation consultant, the Committee oversees and approves key aspects of executive compensation, including our CEOs and other executive officers salaries, goals and payouts under the annual cash incentive plan, the size and structure of LTI awards and any executive perquisites or other benefits.
· In determining compensation for our NEOs, the Committee considers the factors outlined above and consults with its independent compensation consultant and the CEO (regarding the NEOs, other than himself). In determining compensation for the CEO, the Committee also reviews the CEOs self-assessment of his performance against his Board-approved Company and business area objectives.
· In implementing the Companys executive compensation program, the Committee takes into account the cyclical nature of the hospitality business, competitive market data and the alignment of the Companys total pay opportunity and pay outcomes with performance.
| ||
Management |
|
· The CEO and Chief Human Resources Officer work closely with the Committee in managing the executive compensation program and attend meetings of the Committee.
· The CEO makes recommendations to the Committee regarding compensation for executive officers other than himself.
| ||
Independent Compensation Consultant |
|
· The Committees independent compensation consultant, Exequity, provides research, survey information and analysis, incentive design expertise and other analyses related to compensation levels and design. Exequity also updates the Committee on trends and developments related to executive compensation practices and provides its views to the Committee on best practices when evaluating executive pay programs and policies.
· In 2018, Exequitys services to the Committee included, among other things, providing perspective on current trends and developments in executive and director compensation, analyzing benchmarking data and evaluating our peer group composition. It otherwise performed no other services for the Company. The Committee evaluated whether any of the work provided by Exequity during 2018 raised any conflict of interest and determined that it did not.
|
24 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
In 2018, the Committee considered the outcome of the stockholder advisory vote on 2017 executive compensation when making decisions relating to the compensation of our NEOs and our executive compensation program and policies. Our stockholders voted at our 2018 annual meeting, in a non-binding, advisory vote, on the 2017 compensation paid to our NEOs. Approximately 97% of the votes were cast in favor of the Companys 2017 compensation decisions, which is similar to prior years. Based on this level of support, the Committee decided that the Say on Pay vote result did not necessitate any substantive changes to our compensation program. |
We consider the opinions expressed by stockholders through their votes, periodic meetings and other communications and believe that stockholder engagement leads to enhanced governance practices. We have a proactive investor outreach program, which includes meetings with the investment community and one-on-one meetings or meetings in small groups. We periodically engage investors to discuss specific matters of importance to stockholders. We value the perspective of our stockholders and will continue to seek their input on an ongoing basis.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PEER GROUP
To gain a general understanding of current compensation practices, the Committee reviews pay of executives serving in similar positions at peer companies. The external market data reviewed for 2018 included peer group proxy data and broad industry-comparative compensation surveys. The Committee reviews the composition of the peer group on an annual basis in consultation with its independent compensation consultant and considers:
Industries that attract and retain similar talent | ||
Global presence and brand recognition | ||
|
Comparable size based on annual revenue, system-wide revenue of approximately $43 billion,(1) market capitalization, Adjusted EBITDA and number of employees |
(1) 2018 | system-wide revenue reflects estimated revenues of franchised properties, in addition to revenues from properties managed, owned or leased by Hilton. |
CHANGES TO THE PEER GROUP
The Committee adjusted the peer group in August 2017 in light of the spin-offs of Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. and Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. (the spin-offs), our new capital-efficient business model and Marriotts acquisition of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide. To better reflect our post-spin business characteristics, the Committee reviewed a broad set of potential peers using the criteria outlined above and made the following changes:
Additions Travel industry peers (Booking Holdings Inc. and Expedia Group, Inc.), a talent competitor due to their close geographic proximity to our corporate headquarters (Capital One Financial Corporation) and a global consumer brand that is also a global travel and hospitality company (The Walt Disney Company) | ||
Exits Companies with lower business model comparability (Avis Budget Group, Inc., Darden Restaurants, Inc., FedEx Corporation, General Mills, Inc. and Kellogg Company), a real estate business no longer appropriate post-spin (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.) and an acquisition (Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.) |
2018 PEER GROUP COMPANIES
In August 2018, the Committee reviewed and approved the peer group listed in the table below (the peer group). This is the peer group the Committee referenced when determining 2018 base salaries, annual cash incentive targets and LTI targets for our executive officers. The peer group consisted of 17 hospitality, travel and global consumer brands and restaurants that have a corporate structure and global presence comparable to the Company.
Hospitality | Travel | Global Consumer Brands & Restaurants | ||||||
Hyatt Hotels Corporation |
Booking Holdings Inc. |
Capital One Financial Corporation | ||||||
Marriott International, Inc. | Carnival Corporation | McDonalds Corporation | ||||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation(2) | Expedia Group, Inc. | NIKE, Inc. | ||||||
Las Vegas Sands Corporation | Starbucks Corporation | |||||||
MGM Resorts International | The Walt Disney Company | |||||||
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. | YUM! Brands, Inc. | |||||||
United Continental Holdings, Inc. | ||||||||
Wynn Resorts, Limited |
(2) | In 2018, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation was renamed Wyndham Destinations, Inc. and completed the spin-off of Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. External market data reviewed for 2018 reflected Wyndham Worldwide Corporation compensation information. |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 25 |
Our 2018 NEOs |
Christopher J. Nassetta President & Chief
|
Kevin J. Jacobs EVP & Chief Financial Officer
|
Jonathan W. Witter EVP & Chief Customer Officer
|
Ian R. Carter EVP & President, Global Development
|
Kristin A. Campbell EVP & General Counsel
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW & PAY FOR PERFORMANCE
In structuring our executive compensation packages, the Committee considers how each component of compensation promotes retention and motivates performance. We believe that to attract and retain senior executives, we must provide them with a competitive level of compensation that rewards their continued service. We also believe that performance-based compensation plays the most significant role in aligning managements interests with those of our stockholders. For this reason, performance-based at-risk compensation constitutes the majority of TDC, as illustrated below.
Our executive compensation program remains consistent with last year and is summarized below, including the performance measures for our annual cash incentives and LTI. The Committee believes that these measures motivate and reward executives for successfully executing our business strategies. Hiltons key strategic priorities are to maximize performance, expand our global footprint, win on customer experience and align our culture and organization.
Pay Elements
|
Form
|
Performance Measures, Rationale & Key Characteristics
|
Objectives
| |||||||||||||||
Base Salary |
Cash
|
Provide a competitive fixed level of pay
|
Align with external market and internal equity for each role, responsibility and experience
| |||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentives Maximum Payout: 2x target for CEO 1.5x for other NEOs |
Cash
|
Financial |
Annual Adjusted EBITDA is the key corporate metric |
Align actual payout based on achievement of pre-established objectives for annual financial and strategic performance | ||||||||||||||
Business Area
|
Quantitative and qualitative objectives, specific to each individual and their function | |||||||||||||||||
Organizational Strength |
Leadership results from annual employee engagement survey and talent management objectives | |||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentives |
Equity |
50%
|
Performance Awards(1)(2) |
50% |
3-Year FCF per share CAGR |
Generating significant FCF maximizes our performance |
Reward for long-term Company performance; align with interests of our stockholders; retain executives through vesting over multi-year periods | |||||||||||
Maximum Payout: 2x target Vest based on a 3-year performance period
|
Allows us to reinvest in our business and return capital to stockholders
| |||||||||||||||||
50% |
3-Year Adjusted EBITDA CAGR
| |||||||||||||||||
25% |
RSUs(2) |
Value at vesting is based on stock price
| ||||||||||||||||
Vest ratably over 2 years
|
||||||||||||||||||
25% |
Stock Options |
Value at vesting is based on stock price appreciation | ||||||||||||||||
Vest ratably over 3 years
|
(1) | Performance awards granted in 2018 were performance-vesting restricted stock units. In prior years, performance-vesting restricted stock was granted. |
(2) | RSUs and performance awards accrue dividend equivalents payable in cash following vesting, to the extent the underlying award vests. No dividend equivalents are paid unless the underlying RSUs or performance awards vest. |
26 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
We believe it is important to provide a competitive fixed level of pay to attract and retain experienced and successful executives. In determining the amount of base salary that each NEO receives, we look to the executives current compensation, tenure, performance, any change in the executives position or responsibilities and the complexity and scope of the executives position as compared to those of other executives within the Company and in similar positions at companies in our peer group. The Committee reviews base salaries periodically and may adjust them from time to time pursuant to such review.
In 2018, the Committee reviewed and set the base salaries as set forth in the table below, increasing base salaries for all NEOs except for the CEO by 3% to 4%. These increases were consistent with market practices and increases for our corporate team members.
Name |
2017 Base Salary ($) |
2018 Base Salary ($) |
2017 to 2018 Increase (%) | ||||||||||||
Christopher J. Nassetta |
$1,250,000 | $1,250,000 | | ||||||||||||
Kevin J. Jacobs |
$800,000 | $824,000 | 3.0 | % | |||||||||||
Jonathan W. Witter |
$800,000 | $824,000 | 3.0 | % | |||||||||||
Ian R. Carter |
$764,909 | $787,856 | 3.0 | % | |||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell |
$655,636 | $681,861 | 4.0 | % |
Our annual cash incentive program is designed to motivate executive officers to focus on strategic business results and initiatives and reward them for their results and achievements.
2018 TARGETS FOR ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE PROGRAM
Each NEOs target annual cash incentive opportunity is expressed as a percentage of his or her base salary in effect at the end of the performance period. Threshold, target and maximum annual incentive opportunities are approved annually by the Committee based on peer group benchmark data and the scope and impact the executive has on the Companys overall results. For 2018, the Committee set the threshold, target and maximum payout levels as set forth in the table below, which remained the same as 2017.
Name |
Threshold(1) | Target(1) | Maximum(1) | ||||||||||||
Christopher J. Nassetta |
75% | 150% | 300% | ||||||||||||
Kevin J. Jacobs |
50% | 100% | 150% | ||||||||||||
Jonathan W. Witter |
50% | 100% | 150% | ||||||||||||
Ian R. Carter |
50% | 100% | 150% | ||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell |
50% | 100% | 150% |
(1) | As a percentage of base salary. |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 27 |
2018 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES FOR ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE PROGRAM
Each NEOs annual cash incentive award opportunity is based on pre-established performance objectives. At the beginning of each performance period, our CEO works with senior management to establish business priorities, which are then used to create the performance objectives. Each objective is given a specific weighting based on its scope, importance and strategic relevance. The weighting for each objective is expressed as a percentage of the NEOs total award opportunity. The Committee then reviews and approves the objectives recommended for each NEO.
The 2018 annual cash incentive program was based on a combination of financial, business area and organizational strength objectives. The weightings for each of the performance objectives are illustrated below and remain the same as last year:
|
Financial The primary financial performance objective was our Adjusted EBITDA, the key metric we use to assess performance over the short-term.(1) | |||
|
Organizational Strength Specific to each individual and the function for which he or she is responsible, these objectives included two equally weighted components: leadership results and talent management. Leadership results were calculated based on responses to questions in our annual global employee engagement survey on leadership, engagement and trust from each business area. Talent management objectives were designed to cultivate an inclusive environment, demonstrate meaningful progress towards greater workforce diversity and achieve succession planning objectives to support talent movement and business continuity. | |||
|
Business Area Both quantitative and qualitative in nature, business area objectives were specific to each individual and the function for which he or she is responsible. The business area objectives for each NEO were as follows: |
Name
|
Primary Business Area Performance Goals
| |||
Christopher J. Nassetta |
· Compilation of the actual performance of each business area against predetermined objectives, including organizational strength goals, representing results across all areas of the Company
| |||
Kevin J. Jacobs |
· Drive stockholder return through efficient capital allocation and optimizing the balance sheet · Maximize value in our global hotel portfolio · Continue to bolster our financial compliance and control culture
| |||
Jonathan W. Witter |
· Drive integrated performance across all our categories and brands · Drive innovation to deliver high quality, consistent and distinctive brands · Win on customer experience and be the hotel of choice for owners
| |||
Ian R. Carter |
· Drive system-wide net unit growth · Expand our global footprint by filling strategic market gaps, expanding our luxury portfolio and achieving our international growth strategy · Execute owner agreements and construction starts globally across all our brands
| |||
Kristin A. Campbell | · Support key business area objectives across the organization · Enhance our governance, compliance and privacy capabilities globally · Drive legal process and efficiency improvements across the organization
|
(1) | For each NEO other than Mr. Witter, the financial performance measure was based solely on Adjusted EBITDA, which is calculated as set forth in Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Mr. Witters financial measure included both Adjusted EBITDA (20% of his total award opportunity) and Franchise Fees (20% of his total award opportunity). Franchise Fees are presented in the consolidated statements of operations in our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
28 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
2018 PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE PROGRAM
At the beginning of the fiscal year following the end of the performance period, each goal is assessed and rated based on the level of achievement. The Finance and Human Resources departments review the achievement of each performance objective against the predetermined objectives with the CEO. The CEO then reviews these results with the Committee and recommends payout amounts under the annual cash incentive plan for each of the NEOs, other than himself. The Committee reviews and assesses each NEOs achievement towards the executives goals and determines and approves the achievement level used to calculate the actual annual cash incentive award payable to each NEO.
Financial Performance Measure Results
(1) | To receive a payout, actual performance must exceed the threshold performance goal. For actual performance between the specified threshold, target and maximum levels, the resulting payout percentage would be adjusted on a linear basis. |
(2) | As described on the previous page, for each NEO other than Mr. Witter, the financial performance measure was based solely on Adjusted EBITDA. Mr. Witters financial measure included both Adjusted EBITDA (20% of his total award opportunity) and Franchise Fees (20% of his total award opportunity). |
Franchise Fees are a fundamental component of revenue for our resilient, fee-based business model. For the 20% of Mr. Witters total award opportunity based on Franchise Fees, the payout design is similar to his Adjusted EBITDA measure (shown above). Mr. Witter was eligible to receive a threshold payout percentage, defined as 50% of the target award, if actual achievement was 90% of the target goal ($1,498M) and was eligible to receive the maximum payout percentage, defined as 150% of the target award, if actual achievement met or exceeded 110% of the target goal. Actual achievement was $1,540M which was 102.8% of the target goal and resulted in a payout equal to 114.1% of the target payout. |
Actual annual cash incentive awards were calculated by multiplying each NEOs actual base salary by his or her respective target award potential, which was then adjusted by the combined achievement of the financial, business area and organizational strength performance objectives. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the NEOs target cash incentive opportunity and their cash incentive award earned (as reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table) were as follows:
Name |
Year-End Base Salary ($) |
Target Annual Cash Incentive Opportunity as a Percentage of Base Salary (%) |
Target Annual Cash Incentive Opportunity ($) |
Actual Amount Earned as a Percentage of Target Payout (%) |
Actual Amount Earned Under Annual Cash Incentive Program ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Christopher J. Nassetta |
$1,250,000 | 150 | % | $1,875,000 | 131.4 | % | $2,462,813 | ||||||||||||||||||
Kevin J. Jacobs |
$824,000 | 100 | % | $824,000 | 112.7 | % | $928,730 | ||||||||||||||||||
Jonathan W. Witter |
$824,000 | 100 | % | $824,000 | 112.9 | % | $929,884 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ian R. Carter |
$787,856 | 100 | % | $787,856 | 118.7 | % | $935,501 | ||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell |
|
$681,861 |
|
100 |
% |
|
$681,861 |
|
115.1 |
% |
|
$784,959 |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 29 |
The LTI program is designed to reward for future Company performance, align with the long-term interests of our stockholders and retain executives. LTI compensation is awarded annually under the Incentive Plans and provides an opportunity for executive officers and other key employees to increase their ownership interest in the Company through grants of equity-based awards.
2018 LTI TARGETS
Each NEOs target LTI opportunity is set as a percentage of base salary and approved annually by the Committee based on peer group benchmark data and the scope and impact the executive has on the Companys overall results. For 2018, the Committee set the target pay levels as set forth in the table below. The increases were made after considering individual performance, level of pay relative to the market and internal equity.
For the CEO, the Board considered his extensive experience in the hospitality industry and performance during his ten-plus year tenure as our CEO, as well as their desire for leadership continuity to promote Hiltons long-term growth. As a result, the Board decided to position Mr. Nassettas pay more competitively relative to our peers by increasing his target TDC opportunity. The Board did not raise Mr. Nassettas base salary or bonus target, but instead increased his target LTI opportunity the pay element most aligned with stockholder value over the long term. During the past decade under Mr. Nassettas leadership, Hilton has created significant value for our stockholders, including our IPO in 2013 and the spin-offs in 2017. The spin-offs completed Hiltons transformation into a fee-based, capital-efficient business model. In the past three years, our stockholders have seen a total stockholder return (including reinvestment of dividends) of 67%, which is more than double the S&P 500 Index for the same period. Going forward, the Board believes Mr. Nassettas leadership is key to our continued success at the forefront of the hospitality industry.
Name | 2017 Target Long-Term Incentive(1) ($) |
|
2018 Target Long-Term Incentive(1) ($) |
|
2017 to 2018 Increase (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Christopher J. Nassetta |
$6,875,000 | $15,833,000 | 130.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Kevin J. Jacobs |
$2,400,000 | $2,852,000 | 18.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Jonathan W. Witter |
$2,400,000 | $2,852,000 | 18.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ian R. Carter |
$1,966,909 | $2,025,916 | 3.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell |
|
$1,639,091 |
|
$1,881,677 |
|
14.8 |
% |
(1) | The dollar values above represent the nominal amounts used to determine the number of performance award units, RSUs and stock options granted. For the grant date fair value of the 2018 awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, see the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. |
30 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
2018 LTI GRANTS
In February 2018, the Committee granted LTI awards at 100% of target. Grants under the LTI program were delivered using a blended equity portfolio, with 50% of the total LTI award amount for each NEO delivered in performance awards, 25% in RSUs and 25% in stock options. The largest portion of the total equity award takes the form of performance awards to incentivize our NEOs to achieve our most critical long-term objectives, with the remaining portion equally split between RSUs and stock options to promote retention, serve as a linkage to stockholder value and increase NEOs ownership interest in the Company.
PERFORMANCE AWARDS GRANTED IN 2018
Performance shares are intended to focus our executives on the long-term financial performance of the Company and vest based on a three-year performance period. For the performance awards granted in 2018, the Committee chose FCF per share CAGR and EBITDA CAGR as performance measures because they align managements interests with stockholders and incentivize management to achieve the Companys long-term strategy. The Committee will determine the number of performance awards earned based on the level of achievement of each of the performance goals after the three-year performance period, as illustrated below.
(1) | FCF per share is calculated as: (a) net cash provided by (used in) operating activities reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP, less (b) capital expenditures as disclosed by the Company in reports filed with or furnished to the SEC, plus (c) costs and expenses, including tax payments, relating to asset purchases and disposals, including the spin-offs of Park and HGV and (d) excluding the impact on annual adjusted free cash flow resulting from any loyalty program advanced point sales; the result of which is divided by (e) the reported diluted weighted number of shares outstanding for the last calendar year being measured. |
(2) | In order to receive a payout, actual performance must exceed the threshold performance goal. For actual performance between the specified threshold, target and maximum levels, the resulting payout percentage will be adjusted on a linear basis. |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 31 |
TREATMENT OF LONG-TERM INCENTIVE AWARDS UPON TERMINATION, CHANGE IN CONTROL OR RETIREMENT
Each equity-based award subjects the holder to restrictive covenants, including post-employment covenants not to solicit the Companys employees or customers and not to compete against the Company for 12 months following any termination of employment, and indefinite covenants covering trade secrets, confidentiality and non-disparagement. Under the award agreements, if there is a restrictive covenant violation or the Company determines after termination that grounds for a termination for cause existed, the executive will be required to pay the Company an amount equal to the after-tax proceeds received upon the sale or other disposition or distributions in respect of the equity award and any shares issued in respect thereof. Further, each of these executives equity-based awards is subject to the Companys Clawback Policy (described in the Clawback Policy section). Additional provisions are outlined in the table below.
Award Type |
Provisions for Unvested Awards | |
Performance Awards |
● Death or disability (as defined in the Incentive Plans) Prorated portion will immediately vest at target levels(1) ● Change in control (as defined in the Incentive Plans) Immediate vesting occurs only if there is a qualifying termination (as described in the applicable award agreement) within 12 months following a change in control (a double trigger)(2) ● Retirement Prorated portion will remain outstanding and eligible to vest at the end of the performance period based on actual performance(1)(3) ● Other reasons Forfeited(4)
| |
Restricted Stock Units |
● Death or disability Immediately vest ● Change in control Immediate vesting occurs only upon a double trigger(2) ● Retirement Continue to vest according to the original vesting schedule(3) ● Other reasons Forfeited(4)
| |
Stock Options(5) |
● Death or disability Immediately vest and become exercisable ● Change in control Immediate vesting occurs only upon a double trigger(2) ● Retirement Continue to vest according to the original vesting schedule(3) ● Other reasons Forfeited unvested(4)
|
(1) | Prorated based on the number of days in the applicable three-year period that have elapsed prior to termination. |
(2) | Upon a change in control without a qualifying termination event, unvested awards continue to vest according to their original schedule. For performance awards, the number of units subject to each award will be based on actual performance through the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the change in control or at a level as determined by the Committee in its good faith discretion. |
(3) | Retirement is defined as a termination of employment for any reason (other than for cause when grounds for cause exist or due to death or disability) after having reached age 55 and achieved at least 10 years of service, provided that the grant was made at least 6 months prior to the executives retirement. |
(4) | Termination for any other reason generally results in forfeiture of all unvested awards. However, for Mr. Witters RSU sign-on award that vests over two years (as shown in the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2018 Fiscal Year-End table), if the Company terminates Mr. Witters employment without cause prior to May 24, 2019, any unvested RSUs will immediately vest. |
(5) | Upon death or disability, vested options remain exercisable for one year. Upon a double trigger following change in control, vested options remain exercisable for 90 days. Upon retirement, vested options remain exercisable until the earlier of (x) the original expiration date or (y) five years from retirement. Upon termination for cause or a violation of specified restrictive covenants, all vested and unvested options terminate and all other unvested awards are forfeited. Upon termination for other reasons, vested options remain exercisable for 90 days. In no case will options remain exercisable later than the original expiration date. |
32 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
OTHER BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES
General Benefits |
● Health and Welfare Benefits Our executives, including NEOs, are eligible for benefits including group health, dental and disability insurance and basic life insurance premiums. These benefits are intended to provide competitive and adequate protection in case of sickness, disability or death, and the NEOs participate in these plans on the same basis as all other employees.
| |
Retirement Savings Benefits |
● 401(k) Plan The Company maintains a tax-qualified 401(k) plan, under which the Company matches 100% of employee contributions up to 3% of eligible compensation and 50% of employee contributions on the next 2% of eligible compensation. ● Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (EDCP) We have historically offered the NEOs and other senior management the opportunity to supplement their retirement and other tax-deferred savings through Hiltons EDCP. Those eligible to participate in the EDCP could elect to defer up to 80% of their annual salary and up to 100% of their bonus. The Company did not provide a contribution or match to the EDCP. As of December 31, 2018, the EDCP was frozen, meaning no new participants may enter the plan and no compensation that is earned after December 31, 2018 may be deferred. Additional information about the EDCP is reflected under 2018 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.
| |
Perquisites |
● Limited Program We provide limited perquisites to our NEOs when determined to be necessary and appropriate. The value of the NEOs perquisites and other personal benefits are reflected in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table and the accompanying footnote. The cost of these benefits has historically been a small percentage of the overall compensation package. We believe that these benefits and perquisites are competitive in our industry and consistent with our overall compensation philosophy. ● All NEOs We provide our NEOs with the opportunity for an annual physical examination. We also provide NEOs complimentary rooms, food and beverage and on-site services while on personal travel at Company-branded hotels. The travel-related benefits are consistent with our peers in the hospitality industry and offered to encourage our NEOs to visit and evaluate our properties. ● CEO We provide Mr. Nassetta with a life insurance benefit for his family and the associated taxes. In addition, Mr. Nassetta is authorized to use Company aircraft for all travel, which is the Companys preference, due to security reasons and the global nature of our business. This method of travel enables Mr. Nassetta to efficiently respond to business priorities and to use travel time in a productive manner for the Company.
|
In addition to our 401(k) plan and EDCP, Mr. Carter participates in two of our defined benefit pension plans, the Hilton U.K. Pension Plan (the U.K. Pension Plan) and the Hilton U.K. Hotels Employer-Financed Retirement Benefit Scheme (the Supplemental U.K. Plan), because of his previous service as Chief Executive Officer of Hilton International. Mr. Carter ceased further pensionable service under both plans in 2009. See the 2018 Pension Benefits table for a description of these defined benefit pension plans.
The Committee believes that a carefully structured severance plan is necessary to attract and retain talent. Our severance plan allows executives to focus their attention and energy on making objective business decisions that are in the best interest of stockholders. In addition, the Committee believes that the interests of our stockholders are better protected and enhanced by providing greater certainty regarding executive pay obligations in the context of planning and negotiating any potential corporate transactions.
In August 2018, the Committee renewed the Companys existing executive severance plan, which was adopted at the time of the Companys IPO in 2013 and expired at the end of 2018. Under the terms of the 2019 Executive Severance Plan effective January 1, 2019 (the Severance Plan), if an eligible executives employment is terminated by us without cause, or if the eligible employee terminates his or her employment for good reason (each, a qualifying termination), then, subject to the eligible employees execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us, continued compliance with restrictive covenants related to post-employment non-solicitation and non-compete covenants for one year following termination, and indefinite covenants covering confidentiality and non-disparagement, he or she will be eligible to receive a severance payment amount based on the employees position and then-current base salary and target bonus. Under the terms of the Severance Plan, our NEOs will be eligible to receive a severance payment equal to 2.0 times (2.99 times in the case of Mr. Nassetta) the sum of his or her annual base salary and annual target bonus at the time of termination, paid in a lump sum. In addition, upon a qualifying termination, the NEO will be entitled to certain continued health and welfare benefits, as described under Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.
The NEOs will also be entitled to the same level of severance upon a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control except that severance may be reduced if doing so would result in the executive realizing a better after-tax result following the imposition of any applicable golden parachute excise taxes under Internal Revenue Code Section 4999.
In addition to the Severance Plan, any compensation and benefits to be made in connection with a separation are determined at the discretion of the Committee and may be based on the executive, his or her position, the nature of the separation and the respective executives compliance with specified post-termination restrictive covenants.
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 33 |
KEY EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PRACTICES
We follow key executive compensation practices that promote good governance and serve the interests of our stockholders, as summarized below.
What We Do: | ||
|
Emphasize long-term performance Our LTI program is designed to focus executives on long-term stockholder value and emphasize achievement of strategic objectives over the next several years. | |
|
Engage an independent compensation consultant The Committees consultant does not provide any other services to the Company. | |
|
Apply double trigger vesting in the event of a change in control Cash severance benefits are payable and vesting of equity awards is accelerated only upon a double trigger, meaning when an executives employment is terminated following a change in control. For performance awards, the Committee implemented double trigger vesting beginning with grants made in 2017 to better align with market practices and stockholder interests. As a result, all of the Companys outstanding equity awards accelerate vesting only upon a double trigger. | |
|
Provide limited perquisites Our NEOs receive perquisites consistent with industry practices and participate in the same Company-wide plans and programs offered to all eligible employees. | |
|
Apply a clawback policy The Committee has discretion to recover incentive compensation paid or awarded based on financial results impacted by fraud or misconduct. | |
|
Evaluate share utilization The Committee annually reviews share utilization, burn rate and dilution levels resulting from our compensation practices. | |
|
Establish caps on maximum payouts The Committee sets maximum amounts that may be payable for annual cash incentive compensation and long-term performance awards. |
What We Do Not Do:
|
Provide employment agreements or individual change in control agreements for our NEOs The Committee has determined that employment agreements are not necessary to attract members of our executive team. | |
|
Allow pledging, hedging or short-sale transactions Per our Insider Trading Policy, all covered persons are prohibited from purchasing Company securities on margin or pledging Company securities as collateral. Further, we do not permit short sales or the purchase or sale of derivative instruments based on the Companys securities. | |
|
Reprice or buyout underwater stock options Our Incentive Plans do not permit the repricing or substitution of underwater stock options except with stockholder approval. Our Incentive Plans also do not permit the grant of stock options with below-market exercise prices, except in connection with certain corporate transactions. | |
|
Pay dividends or dividend equivalents on any unvested equity awards prior to vesting Our Incentive Plans and associated award agreements prohibit the payment and delivery of dividends and dividend equivalents on unvested RSUs and performance awards, unless and until the underlying award vests.
|
We have adopted an executive stock ownership policy for our NEOs. Each of our NEOs is expected to own shares of our common stock in the following amounts within five years from the later of February 19, 2014 and the date he or she first becomes subject to the stock ownership policy:
Role
|
Salary Multiple
|
|||||
CEO
|
5 times base salary
|
|||||
Other Executive Officers
|
3 times base salary
|
Each NEO currently satisfies the stock ownership requirement above. Under this requirement, executives may not dispose of any shares of the Company they acquire, including, but not limited to, any shares of vested restricted stock, any shares underlying vested restricted stock units, net of taxes, or any shares acquired upon the exercise of any stock options, net of taxes and payment of any exercise price, in each case, received from grants made until the ownership requirements are satisfied. This restriction does not apply to any shares of our common stock received by the executive in exchange for his or her equity held prior to our IPO.
34 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
We have adopted a clawback policy for our incentive compensation. The Committee determined that it may be appropriate to recover annual and/or LTI compensation from its current or former officers subject to reporting under Section 16 of the Exchange Act or any other employee designated by the Committee in specified situations. These situations include if such employee was overpaid as a result of a restatement of the reported financial results of the Company or any of its segments due to material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements (unless due to a change in accounting policy or applicable law) caused or contributed to by such employees fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence. If these situations occur, the Committee will review the incentive compensation paid, granted, vested or accrued based on the prior inaccurate results and determine whether to seek recovery of any excess incentive compensation paid or earned as a result of such inaccurate results.
The annual grant of stock-based awards to our NEOs is approved on the date of the first regularly scheduled Committee meeting of the calendar year (typically held in the first quarter). In addition to annual awards, other grants may be awarded at other times: (1) to attract new hires; (2) to recognize employees for special achievements or for retention purposes; (3) to new employees as a result of the acquisition of another company; or (4) as may be desirable and prudent in other special circumstances. The exercise price of stock options is the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant. We monitor and periodically review our equity grant policies to ensure compliance with plan rules and applicable law. We do not have a program, plan or practice to time our equity grants in coordination with the release of material, non-public information.
The Committee believes that the design and objectives of our executive compensation program provide an appropriate balance of incentives for executives and avoid inappropriate risks. In this regard, our executive compensation program includes the following design features:
· | Balances fixed versus at-risk compensation |
· | Balances short-term cash and LTI compensation |
· | Provides that at-risk compensation is based on a variety of qualitative and quantitative performance goals, including the Companys stock price, the Companys overall financial performance and the performance of specific business area objectives |
· | Caps the executives incentive compensation opportunities |
· | Provides the Committee with discretion to reduce the annual incentive amount awarded |
· | Significant stock ownership requirements |
· | Provides for a clawback of the executives compensation in specified circumstances |
· | Prohibits pledging and hedging of Company stock |
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limits the Companys federal income tax deduction for any compensation in excess of one million dollars paid to NEOs (except for the CFO, in the case of tax years preceding 2018). For tax years prior to 2018, the deductibility limitation under Section 162(m) did not apply to certain performance-based compensation arrangements or certain awards granted or paid during the Companys post-IPO transition period under Section 162(m) (which ended on the date of our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders). However, due to amendments to Section 162(m), the performance-based compensation exception is no longer available for compensation paid with respect to fiscal 2018 and future years (unless paid pursuant to certain pre-November 2, 2017 contractual arrangements).
Accordingly, while the Committee takes the deductibility limitations of Section 162(m) into account in its compensation decisions, we expect to authorize compensation payments that are not exempt under Section 162(m) when the Committee believes that such payments are appropriate to attract or retain talent.
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 35 |
The following table presents summary information regarding the total compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each of our NEOs for the fiscal years indicated.
Name |
Year | Salary(1) ($) |
Bonus(2) ($) |
Stock Awards(3)(4) ($) |
Option Awards(3) ($) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
Change in & Nonqualified |
All Other Compensation(6) ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christopher J. Nassetta President & Chief Executive Officer |
|
2018 |
|
|
$1,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$11,874,648 |
|
|
$3,958,229 |
|
|
$2,462,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
$244,879 |
|
|
$19,790,569 |
| |||||||||
|
2017 |
|
|
$1,242,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
$13,156,151 |
|
|
$1,718,737 |
|
|
$2,604,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
$69,127 |
|
|
$18,790,698 |
| ||||||||||
|
2016 |
|
|
$1,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$6,532,917 |
|
|
$1,319,999 |
|
|
$1,883,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
$64,507 |
|
|
$11,001,328 |
| ||||||||||
Kevin J. Jacobs EVP & Chief Financial Officer |
|
2018 |
|
|
$820,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
$2,138,959 |
|
|
$712,996 |
|
|
$928,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
$11,000 |
|
|
$4,611,993 |
| |||||||||
|
2017 |
|
|
$791,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
$5,799,912 |
|
|
$599,999 |
|
|
$942,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
$10,800 |
|
|
$8,144,599 |
| ||||||||||
|
2016 |
|
|
$743,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
$2,091,147 |
|
|
$422,295 |
|
|
$735,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
$24,245 |
|
|
$4,017,018 |
| ||||||||||
Jonathan W. Witter EVP & Chief Customer Officer |
|
2018 |
|
|
$820,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
$2,138,959 |
|
|
$712,996 |
|
|
$929,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
$11,000 |
|
|
$4,613,147 |
| |||||||||
|
2017 |
|
|
$584,615 |
|
|
$250,000 |
|
|
$10,299,938 |
|
|
$599,988 |
|
|
$648,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$12,382,879 |
| ||||||||||
Ian R. Carter EVP & President, Global Development |
|
2018 |
|
|
$784,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
$1,519,315 |
|
|
$506,466 |
|
|
$935,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3,745,608 |
| |||||||||
|
2017 |
|
|
$761,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
$1,475,159 |
|
|
$491,725 |
|
|
$908,722 |
|
|
$195,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
$3,832,403 |
| ||||||||||
|
2016 |
|
|
$739,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
$1,891,199 |
|
|
$381,921 |
|
|
$765,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
$2,836 |
|
|
$3,781,117 |
| ||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell EVP & General Counsel |
|
2018 |
|
|
$677,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
$1,411,161 |
|
|
$470,416 |
|
|
$784,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
$11,000 |
|
|
$3,355,362 |
| |||||||||
|
2017 |
|
|
$652,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
$3,229,219 |
|
|
$409,771 |
|
|
$780,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
$10,800 |
|
|
$5,082,925 |
| ||||||||||
|
2016 |
|
|
$633,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
$1,575,984 |
|
|
$318,266 |
|
|
$643,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
$12,963 |
|
|
$3,183,934 |
|
(1) | Amounts in this column reflect the salary earned during the fiscal year, whether paid or deferred under the Companys employee benefit plans. |
(2) | Represents the sign-on bonus awarded to Mr. Witter. |
(3) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, using the assumptions discussed in Note 16: Share-Based Compensation of the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
(4) | In accordance with the SECs rules, dividend equivalents that accrued on the executives RSUs and performance awards granted in 2018 are not reported above because dividends were factored into the grant date fair value of these awards. |
Of the performance awards granted in 2018, 50% vest according to three-year EBITDA CAGR and 50% vest according to three-year FCF per share CAGR. The grant date fair value was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. Assuming the highest level of performance achievement as of the grant date, the aggregate grant date fair value of the performance awards would have been: Mr. Nassetta $15,832,864; Mr. Jacobs $2,851,998; Mr. Witter $2,851,998; Mr. Carter $2,025,806; and Ms. Campbell $1,881,547. |
(5) | For 2018, the actual annual change in pension value was negative ($111,984) for Mr. Carter, but it is not reflected in the table pursuant to SEC regulations regarding negative amounts. Amounts reported represent the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of Mr. Carters accumulated benefit under the defined-present value of the retirement pension due based on assumptions described below. This value is the sum that would be payable should Mr. Carter choose to transfer his benefits from the U.K. Pension Plan in full as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. The key financial assumptions used in the calculation of the present value included discount rates of 4.65%, 4.50% and 4.65% for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, CPI inflation of 2.50%, 2.45% and 2.75% for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and pension inflation of 1.60%, 1.60% and 1.80% for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company does not provide any of its executives with any above-market or preferential earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation. |
(6) | All Other Compensation for 2018 includes: |
Name |
Company 401(k) Match ($) |
Insurance Premiums(a) ($) |
Personal Use of Company Aircraft(b) ($) |
Reimbursements for Taxes Incurred for Specified Perquisites(c) ($) |
Other(d) ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||||||||
Christopher J. Nassetta |
$ |
11,000 |
|
$ |
7,525 |
|
$ |
93,147 |
|
$ |
106,958 |
|
$ |
26,249 |
|
$ |
244,879 |
| ||||||
Kevin J. Jacobs |
$ |
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,000 |
| ||||||
Jonathan W. Witter |
$ |
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,000 |
| ||||||
Ian R. Carter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Kristin A. Campbell |
$ |
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,000 |
|
(a) | Employer-paid premiums for Mr. Nassettas executive life insurance policy. |
(b) | Mr. Nassetta is authorized to use the Company aircraft for all travel, which is the Companys preference, due to security reasons and the global nature of our business. This method of travel enables Mr. Nassetta to efficiently respond to business priorities and to use travel time in a productive manner for the Company. The amount reported reflects incremental costs for personal use of the Company aircraft by Mr. Nassetta and his accompanying guests and is determined by calculating an hourly variable rate (e.g., fuel, catering, certain maintenance costs, landing fees, crew travel and other miscellaneous variable costs) for the aircraft and then multiplying the result by the hours flown for personal use. The amount does not include the fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as crew salaries and hangar storage costs. |
(c) | Reflects $79,213 of employer-paid taxes owed with respect to Mr. Nassettas personal use of the Company aircraft, $6,182 of employer-paid taxes owed in connection with his employer-paid executive life insurance policy and $21,563 of employer-paid taxes owed in connection with employer-paid expenses incurred at Company-branded hotels while on personal travel. |
(d) | Employer-paid expenses incurred at Company-branded hotels while on personal travel. |
36 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
2018 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table sets forth grants of plan-based awards to the NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
Estimated Future Payouts Under |
Estimated Future Payouts Under |
All Other Stock Awards: Number or Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/sh) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(3) ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Award Type | Grant Date |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maximum (#) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christopher J. |
Annual Cash Incentive |
|
|
|
|
$46,875 |
|
|
$1,875,000 |
|
|
$3,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Performance Awards |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,883 |
|
|
99,766 |
|
|
199,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$7,916,432 |
| |||||||||||||
RSUs |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3,958,216 |
| |||||||||||||
Stock Options |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,452 |
|
|
$79.35 |
|
|
$3,958,229 |
| |||||||||||||
Kevin J. |
Annual Cash Incentive |
|
|
|
|
$41,200 |
|
|
$824,000 |
|
|
$1,236,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Performance Awards |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,985 |
|
|
17,971 |
|
|
35,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,425,999 |
| |||||||||||||
RSUs |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$712,960 |
| |||||||||||||
Stock Options |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,983 |
|
|
$79.35 |
|
|
$712,996 |
| |||||||||||||
Jonathan W. |
Annual Cash Incentive |
|
|
|
|
$41,200 |
|
|
$824,000 |
|
|
$1,236,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Performance Awards |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,985 |
|
|
17,971 |
|
|
35,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,425,999 |
| |||||||||||||
RSUs |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$712,960 |
| |||||||||||||
Stock Options |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,983 |
|
|
$79.35 |
|
|
$712,996 |
| |||||||||||||
Ian R. |
Annual Cash Incentive |
|
|
|
|
$39,393 |
|
|
$787,856 |
|
|
$1,181,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Performance Awards |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,382 |
|
|
12,765 |
|
|
25,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,012,903 |
| |||||||||||||
RSUs |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$506,412 |
| |||||||||||||
Stock Options |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,298 |
|
|
$79.35 |
|
|
$506,466 |
| |||||||||||||
Kristin A. |
Annual Cash Incentive |
|
|
|
|
$34,093 |
|
|
$681,861 |
|
|
$1,022,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Performance Awards |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,928 |
|
|
11,856 |
|
|
23,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$940,774 |
| |||||||||||||
RSUs |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$470,387 |
| |||||||||||||
Stock Options |
|
3/1/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,782 |
|
|
$79.35 |
|
|
$470,416 |
|
(1) | Reflects the possible payouts under the 2018 annual cash incentive program. Amounts reported in the Threshold column assume that there is no payout under the Adjusted EBITDA component of the annual cash incentive program and that the NEO only earns the minimum payout for the one business area or organizational strength performance objective that has been assigned the lowest weighting. The actual amounts paid are described in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2) | As described in further detail under LTI Program, the performance awards granted have a three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2020 with 50% vesting based on FCF per share CAGR and 50% vesting based on EBITDA CAGR. Amounts reported in the Threshold column assume that 50% of the target performance awards will vest and amounts reported in the Maximum column assume that 200% of the target performance awards will vest. |
(3) | Represents the grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, using the assumptions discussed in Note 16: Share-Based Compensation of the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The stock options have an exercise price per share equal to the closing price of the Companys common stock as reported on the NYSE on the date of grant. |
The grant date fair value of the performance awards that are scheduled to vest according to three-year EBITDA CAGR was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date and was determined to be for each of Mr. Nassetta, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Witter, Mr. Carter and Ms. Campbell, $3,958,216, $713,039, $713,039, $506,491 and $470,387, respectively. The grant date fair value of the performance awards that are scheduled to vest based on three-year FCF per share CAGR was determined to be for each of Mr. Nassetta, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Witter, Mr. Carter and Ms. Campbell, $3,958,216, $712,960, $712,960, $506,412 and $470,387, respectively. |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 37 |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2018 FISCAL YEAR-END
The following table sets forth outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2018.
Name | Grant Date |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) |
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable(1)(2) (#) |
Option Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) (#) |
Market Value of Not Vested(3) |
Equity Incentive Not
Vested(2)(4) |
Equity Incentive That Have Not Vested(3)(4) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christopher J. Nassetta |
2/19/14 | 74,977 | | $45.46 | 2/19/24 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/15 | 71,125 | | $57.99 | 2/10/25 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/18/16 | 76,192 | 38,097 | $41.41 | 2/18/26 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/27/17 | 41,335 | 82,672 | $58.02 | 2/27/27 | 14,812 | (5) | $1,063,502 | 118,492 | $8,507,726 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/27/17 | | | | | 91,923 | (6) | $6,600,071 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/18 | | 166,452 | $79.35 | 3/1/28 | 49,883 | (5) | $3,581,599 | 199,532 | $14,326,398 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kevin J. Jacobs |
2/19/14 | 22,493 | | $45.46 | 2/19/24 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/15 | 23,143 | | $57.99 | 2/10/25 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/18/16 | 24,374 | 12,189 | $41.41 | 2/18/26 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/27/17 | 14,429 | 28,861 | $58.02 | 2/27/27 | 5,171 | (5) | $371,278 | 41,364 | $2,969,935 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/27/17 | | | | | 45,961 | (6) | $3,300,000 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/18 | | 29,983 | $79.35 | 3/1/28 | 8,985 | (5) | $645,123 | 35,942 | $2,580,636 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jonathan W. Witter |
5/24/17 | 12,665 | 25,333 | $65.48 | 5/24/27 | 4,582 | (5) | $328,988 | 36,652 | $2,631,614 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/24/17 | | | | | 45,816 | (7) | $3,289,589 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/24/17 | | | | | 34,362 | (8) | $2,467,192 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/18 | | 29,983 | $79.35 | 3/1/28 | 8,985 | (5) | $645,123 | 35,942 | $2,580,636 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ian R. Carter |
2/19/14 | 22,493 | | $45.46 | 2/19/24 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/15 | 20,931 | | $57.99 | 2/10/25 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/18/16 | 22,044 | 11,024 | $41.41 | 2/18/26 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/27/17 | 11,825 | 23,653 | $58.02 | 2/27/27 | 4,238 | (5) | $304,288 | 33,900 | $2,434,020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/18 | | 21,298 | $79.35 | 3/1/28 | 6,382 | (5) | $458,228 | 25,530 | $1,833,054 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell |
2/19/14 | 18,744 | | $45.46 | 2/19/24 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/15 | 17,442 | | $57.99 | 2/10/25 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/18/16 | 18,370 | 9,186 | $41.41 | 2/18/26 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/27/17 | 9,854 | 19,711 | $58.02 | 2/27/27 | 3,531 | (5) | $253,526 | 28,250 | $2,028,350 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/27/17 | | | | | 22,981 | (6) | $1,650,036 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/18 | | 19,782 | $79.35 | 3/1/28 | 5,928 | (5) | $425,630 | 23,712 | $1,702,522 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Stock options granted in February vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the following February 15, which is approximately the first anniversary of the grant date. Stock options granted in March vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the following March 3, which is approximately the first anniversary of the grant date. |
(2) | For information on vesting upon specified termination events or a change in control, see LTI Program and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control. |
(3) | Amounts reported are based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE as of December 31, 2018 ($71.80) multiplied by the number of outstanding shares. |
(4) | Performance awards vest according to EBITDA CAGR and FCF per share CAGR at the end of a three-year performance period. In the table above, the number and market value of units reported reflect maximum achievement based on the Companys performance as of December 31, 2018. The actual number of units that will be distributed is not yet determinable. |
(5) | RSUs granted in 2017 vest in two equal annual installments beginning on the following February 15, which is approximately the first anniversary of the grant date for all NEOs other than Mr. Witter, whose RSUs were granted in May 2017. RSUs granted March 2018 vest in two equal annual installments beginning on the following March 3, which is approximately the first anniversary of the grant date. |
(6) | Spin-off grants awarded in February 2017 vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 15, 2018, which is approximately the first anniversary of the grant date. The Committee awarded the spin-off grants in recognition of contributions towards the completion of the January 2017 spin-offs and to promote retention of key executives. The spin-offs completed Hiltons transformation into a fee-based, capital-efficient business model. |
(7) | Sign-on RSUs granted to Mr. Witter that vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. |
(8) | Sign-on RSUs granted to Mr. Witter that vest in two equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. |
38 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
2018 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The following table provides information regarding shares that vested during 2018 for our NEOs.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Name |
Number of Shares Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise ($) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting(1) (#) |
Value Realized on Vesting(2) ($) |
||||||||||||
Christopher J. Nassetta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,350
|
|
|
$13,353,562
|
| ||||
Kevin J. Jacobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,845
|
|
|
$5,008,328
|
| ||||
Jonathan W. Witter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,213
|
|
|
$4,458,682
|
| ||||
Ian R. Carter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,520
|
|
|
$2,735,049
|
| ||||
Kristin A. Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,923
|
|
|
$3,250,776
|
| ||||
(1) | Includes shares received from the vesting of RSUs granted in 2016 and 2017. |
Also includes converted performance awards granted in 2016; in connection with the spin-offs effective January 2017, the NEOs performance-vesting restricted stock awards granted in 2015 and 2016 were converted into time-vesting restricted stock (converted performance awards), assuming a target level of achievement. The Committee determined to convert the performance shares into time-based restricted stock, as the performance periods for the performance shares granted in 2015 and 2016 would have ended after the spin-offs and, as such, the performance measures originally established upon grant would not have been relevant or measurable as originally intended. |
(2) | Amounts reported are based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the vesting date. |
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 39 |
Name |
Plan Name | Number of Years (#) |
Present Value ($) |
Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) |
||||||||||||
Christopher J. Nassetta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Kevin J. Jacobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Jonathan W. Witter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Ian R. Carter
|
|
Hilton U.K. Pension Plan (2)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$519,903
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Supplemental U.K. Plan (3)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$772,826
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Kristin A. Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
(1) | The present value is calculated by the trustee of the U.K. Pension Plan and represents the present value of the retirement pension due based on assumptions described below. This value is the sum that would be payable should Mr. Carter choose to transfer his benefits from the U.K. Pension Plan in full as of December 31, 2018. The key financial assumptions used in the calculation of the present value included discount rates of 4.65% and 4.50% for 2018 and 2017, respectively, CPI inflation of 2.50% and 2.45% for 2018 and 2017, respectively, and pension inflation of 1.60% for 2018 and 2017. |
(2) | The U.K. Pension Plan is a defined benefit pension plan in the U.K., for which benefit payments are payable monthly upon retiring in accordance with the terms of the plan. The pension value is determined based on years and completed months of pensionable service, final pensionable salary (which is subject to an earnings cap) and an accrual ratio. The funds are invested through a trustee, who has full investment discretion. Mr. Carter ceased pensionable service in the U.K. Pension Plan in 2009, and he has a preserved pension based on his pensionable service and final pensionable salary at that time. Mr. Carter has not contributed to the plan since then and the only increases applied to his benefit have been annual statutory increases. The purpose of the U.K. Pension Plan is to provide a retirement benefit based on U.K. market practice. The U.K. Pension Plan does not provide special policies such as granting extra years of credited service, however, it provides tax advantages such as a tax relief on employee contributions and a tax-free cash payment at retirement. |
(3) | The Supplemental U.K. Plan is supplementary to the U.K. Pension Plan and provides an additional retirement benefit to senior management of the Company whose pensionable earnings in the U.K. Pension Plan are restricted to an earnings cap. The Supplemental U.K. Plan does not have assets. While Mr. Carter was a member of the Supplemental U.K. Plan, the Company made notional contributions calculated as a percentage of his base salary in excess of an earnings cap, which applies within the U.K. Pension Plan. No notional contributions have been made for Mr. Carter since 2009, when he ceased pensionable service. Mr. Carter has a notional retirement account balance, which is notionally invested based on Mr. Carters elected investment portfolio. The terms of the Supplemental U.K. Plan provide that funds be paid as a lump sum at the same time as Mr. Carter commences drawing his retirement benefits from the U.K. Plan. The Supplemental U.K. Plan does not provide any special tax treatment. |
40 | PROXY STATEMENT | Hilton |
2018 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
The Company offered the NEOs and other senior management the opportunity to participate in the EDCP during 2018. The table below provides information as of December 31, 2018, for those NEOs who chose to participate in the plan.
Name |
Executive Contributions in Last FY ($) |
Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($) |
Aggregate Earnings in Last FY(1) ($) |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) |
Aggregate Balance at Last FYE(2) ($) |
|||||||||||||||
Christopher J. Nassetta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
$227,310
|
| |||||
Kevin J. Jacobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Jonathan W. Witter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Ian R. Carter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Kristin A. Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Amounts in this column are not reported as compensation for fiscal year 2018 in the Summary Compensation Table since they do not reflect above-market or preferential earnings. Deferrals may be allocated among investment options that generally mirror the investment options available under our qualified 401(k) plan. Of the available investment options, the one-year rate of return during 2018 ranged from -19.77% to 4.14%. |
(2) | Mr. Nassetta made no contributions during fiscal years 2016, 2017 or 2018 and, therefore, no amounts in this column have previously been reported in the Summary Compensation Table. |
Pursuant to our EDCP, specified eligible employees, including our NEOs, were permitted to defer up to 80% of their annual salary and up to 100% of their bonus. Deferral elections were made by eligible employees in the calendar year preceding the year compensation is otherwise payable. In 2018, contributions to the EDCP consisted solely of participants elective deferral contributions and the Company did not provide matching contributions. Eligible employees are permitted to make individual investment elections that will determine the rate of return on their deferral amounts under the elective nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Participants may change their investment elections at any time. Deferrals are only deemed to be invested in the investment options selected. Participants have no ownership interest in any of the funds as investment elections are used only as an index for crediting gains or losses to participants accounts. The investment options consist of a variety of well-known mutual funds including certain non-publicly traded mutual funds available through variable insurance products. Investment gains or losses in the funds are credited to the participants accounts daily, net of investment option related expenses. The EDCP does not provide any above-market returns or preferential earnings to participants, and the deferrals and their earnings are always 100% vested.
NEOs were permitted to elect to receive in-service distributions of such amounts at the time they make their deferral elections. In addition, upon a showing of financial hardship due to death, illness, accident or similar extraordinary or unforeseeable circumstances, an executive may be allowed to access funds in the executives deferred compensation account before he or she otherwise would have been eligible. The participant must make two payout elections, one in the case of termination and one in the case of retirement. Benefits can generally be received either as a lump sum payment or in installments over a period not to exceed 20 years in the case of retirement, 5 years in the case of termination and 5 years for in-service distributions. In the event of a change in control, 100% of the value of the eligible employees deferred compensation account will be distributed.
As of December 31, 2018, the EDCP was frozen, meaning no new participants may enter the plan and no compensation earned after December 31, 2018 may be deferred.
Hilton | PROXY STATEMENT | 41 |
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION
OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
The following table describes the potential payments and benefits that would have been payable to our NEOs under existing plans assuming a termination of employment on December 31, 2018. The amounts shown in the table do not include payments and benefits to the extent they are provided generally to all salaried employees upon termination of employment and do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of the NEOs. Distributions of plan balances that would be made are set forth in the 2018 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table.
Because the disclosures in the table assume the occurrence of a termination as of a particular date and under a particular set of circumstances and therefore make a number of important assumptions, the actual amount to be paid to each of our NEOs upon a termination may vary significantly from the amounts included herein. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event, the continued availability of benefit policies at similar prices and the type of termination event that occurs.
Name |
Qualifying Termination(1) ($) |
Qualifying Termination Within 12 Months Following CIC ($) |
Death or Disability(2) ($) |
|||||||||
Christopher J. Nassetta |
||||||||||||
Cash Severance(1) |
|
$9,343,750 |
|
|
$9,343,750 |
|
|
$1,875,000 |
| |||
Equity Awards(3) |
|
|
|
|
$32,794,684 |
|
|
$18,763,623 |
| |||
Continuation of Benefits(4) |
|
$20,719 |
|
|
$20,719 |
|
|
|
| |||
Outplacement Services(5) |
|
$17,000 |
|
|
$17,000 |
|
|
|
| |||
Other Benefit(6) |
|
$129,808 |
|
|
$129,808 |
|
|
$129,808 |
| |||
Total Value of Benefits |
|
$9,511,277 |
|
|
$42,305,961 |
|
|
$20,768,431 |
| |||
Kevin J. Jacobs |
||||||||||||
Cash Severance(1) |
|
$3,296,000 |
|
|
$3,296,000 |
|
|
$824,000 |
| |||
Equity Awards(3) |
|
|
|
|
$9,989,941 |
|
|
$6,504,221 |
| |||
Continuation of Benefits(4) |
|
$11,784 |
|
|
$11,784 |
|
|
|
| |||
Outplacement Services(5) |
|
$17,000 |
|
|
$17,000 |
|
|
|
| |||
Other Benefit(6) |
|
$85,569 |
|
|
$85,569 |
|
|
$85,569 |
| |||
Total Value of Benefits |
|
$3,410,353 |
|
|
$13,400,294 |
|
|
$7,413,790 |
| |||
Jonathan W. Witter |
||||||||||||
Cash Severance(1) |
|
$3,296,000 |
|
|
$3,296,000 |
|
|
$824,000 |
| |||
Equity Awards(3)(7) |
|
|
|
|
$11,458,086 |
|
|
$8,197,914 |
| |||
Continuation of Benefits(4) |
|
$16,426 |
|
|
$16,426 |
|
|
|
| |||
Outplacement Services(5) |
|
$17,000 |
|
|
$17,000 |
|
|
|
| |||
Other Benefit(6) |
|
$79,231 |
|
|
$79,231 |
|
|
$79,231 |
| |||
Total Value of Benefits |
|
$3,408,657 |
|
|
$14,866,743 |
|
|
$9,101,145 |
| |||
Ian R. Carter |
||||||||||||
Cash Severance(1) |
|
$3,151,424 |
|
|
$3,151,424 |
|
|
$787,856 |
| |||
Equity Awards(3) |
|
|
|
|
$5,232,284 |
|
|
$2,540,044 |
| |||
Continuation of Benefits(4) |
|
$14,246 |
|
|
$14,246 |
|
|
|
| |||
Outplacement Services(5) |
|
$17,000 |
|
|
$17,000 |
|
|
|
| |||
Other Benefit(6) |
|
$81,816 |
|
|
$81,816 |
|
|
$81,816 |
| |||
Total Value of Benefits |
|
$3,264,486 |
|
|
$8,496,770 |
|
|
$3,409,716 |
| |||
Kristin A. Campbell |
||||||||||||
Cash Severance(1) |
|
$2,727,444 |
|