Fund
|
1-Year
|
5-Year
|
10-Year
|
NPP
|
12.07%
|
5.35%
|
6.60%
|
NMA
|
12.90%
|
5.02%
|
6.68%
|
NMO
|
11.71%
|
4.56%
|
5.93%
|
NAD
|
12.60%
|
5.19%
|
7.14%
|
NXZ
|
9.12%
|
4.97%
|
N/A
|
NZF
|
11.41%
|
5.45%
|
N/A
|
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) National Municipal Bond Index2
|
8.06%
|
4.98%
|
5.58%
|
Lipper General Leveraged Municipal Debt Funds Average3
|
13.81%
|
4.87%
|
6.36%
|
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares.
|
|
For additional information, see the individual Performance Overview for your Fund in this report.
|
|
1
|
An inverse floating rate security, also known as an inverse floater, is a financial instrument designed to pay long-term interest at a rate that varies inversely with a short-term interest rate index. For the Nuveen Funds, the index typically used is the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Municipal Swap Index, (previously referred to as the Bond Market Association Index or BMA). Inverse floaters, including those inverse floating rate securities in which the Funds invested during this reporting period, are further defined within the Notes to Financial Statements and Glossary of Terms Used in this Report sections of this report.
|
2
|
The Standard & Poor’s (S&P) National Municipal Bond Index is an unleveraged, market value-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the tax-exempt, investment-grade U.S. municipal bond market. This index does not reflect any initial or ongoing expenses and is not available for direct investment.
|
3
|
The Lipper General Leveraged Municipal Debt Funds Average is calculated using the returns of all leveraged closed-end funds in this category for each period as follows: 1-year, 46 funds; 5-year, 44 funds; and 10-year, 30 funds. Lipper returns account for the effects of management fees and assume reinvestment of dividends, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges. The Lipper average is not available for direct investment.
|
Fund
|
Auction Rate
Preferred Shares |
% of Original
Auction Rate |
||||||
NPP
|
$ | 59,100,000 | 12.3 | % | ||||
NMA
|
$ | 358,000,000 | 100.0 | % | ||||
NMO
|
$ | 380,000,000 | 100.0 | % | ||||
NAD
|
$ | 174,925,000 | 59.3 | % | ||||
NXZ
|
$ | 222,000,000 | 100.0 | % | ||||
NZF
|
$ | 75,050,000 | 24.1 | % |
Fund
|
Long-Term Capital Gains
(per share) |
Short-Term Capital Gains
and/or Ordinary Income |
||||||
NPP
|
$ | 0.0136 | $ | 0.0004 | ||||
NMA
|
$ | 0.0654 | $ | 0.0014 | ||||
NXZ
|
— | $ | 0.0139 | |||||
NZF
|
$ | 0.0449 | $ | 0.0196 |
Fund
|
10/31/10
(+)Premium/(-)Discount |
12-Month Average
(+)Premium/(-)Discount |
|
NPP
|
-1.90%
|
-3.05%
|
|
NMA
|
+0.88%
|
+0.64%
|
|
NMO
|
+2.68%
|
+1.06%
|
|
NAD
|
-1.91%
|
-2.35%
|
|
NXZ
|
-0.61%
|
-0.68%
|
|
NZF
|
-1.09%
|
-2.11%
|
NPP
|
Nuveen Performance
|
Performance
|
Plus Municipal
|
OVERVIEW
|
Fund, Inc.
|
as of October 31, 2010
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||||
Common Share Price
|
$ | 15.00 | ||
Common Share
Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$ | 15.29 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
-1.90 | % | ||
Market Yield
|
6.28 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
8.72 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
$ | 916,152 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years)
|
16.70 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration
|
9.62 |
Average Annual Total Return
(Inception 6/22/89) |
||||||||
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
|||||||
1-Year
|
18.65 | % | 12.07 | % | ||||
5-Year
|
6.83 | % | 5.35 | % | ||||
10-Year
|
8.56 | % | 6.60 | % |
States4
(as a % of total investments) |
||||
Illinois
|
17.3 | % | ||
California
|
12.1 | % | ||
Colorado
|
6.4 | % | ||
Texas
|
4.8 | % | ||
Florida
|
4.7 | % | ||
New Jersey
|
4.4 | % | ||
Ohio
|
4.1 | % | ||
Nevada
|
3.5 | % | ||
Washington
|
3.3 | % | ||
Michigan
|
3.1 | % | ||
New York
|
2.9 | % | ||
Massachusetts
|
2.9 | % | ||
Indiana
|
2.5 | % | ||
Pennsylvania
|
2.3 | % | ||
Puerto Rico
|
2.1 | % | ||
Louisiana
|
2.1 | % | ||
South Carolina
|
1.8 | % | ||
Minnesota
|
1.8 | % | ||
Iowa
|
1.7 | % | ||
Arizona
|
1.5 | % | ||
Other
|
14.7 | % |
Portfolio Composition4
(as a % of total investments) |
||||
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
17.3 | % | ||
Transportation
|
16.5 | % | ||
U.S. Guaranteed
|
14.8 | % | ||
Health Care
|
13.5 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General
|
13.4 | % | ||
Utilities
|
8.0 | % | ||
Consumer Staples
|
6.4 | % | ||
Other
|
10.1 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
2
|
The Fund paid shareholders a capital gain and net ordinary income distribution in December 2009 of $0.0140 per share.
|
3
|
Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
4
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
NMA
|
Nuveen Municipal
|
Performance
|
Advantage
|
OVERVIEW
|
Fund, Inc.
|
as of October 31, 2010
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||||
Common Share Price
|
$ | 14.92 | ||
Common Share
Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$ | 14.79 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
0.88 | % | ||
Market Yield
|
6.64 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
9.22 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
$ | 642,364 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years)
|
18.96 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration
|
9.17 |
Average Annual Total Return
(Inception 12/19/89) |
||||||||
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
|||||||
1-Year
|
19.58 | % | 12.90 | % | ||||
5-Year
|
6.06 | % | 5.02 | % | ||||
10-Year
|
8.34 | % | 6.68 | % |
States4
(as a % of total investments)
|
||||
California
|
12.9 | % | ||
Illinois
|
10.8 | % | ||
Texas
|
10.0 | % | ||
Louisiana
|
8.7 | % | ||
Colorado
|
6.3 | % | ||
Washington
|
6.2 | % | ||
Puerto Rico
|
4.7 | % | ||
Ohio
|
4.0 | % | ||
Pennsylvania
|
3.0 | % | ||
Florida
|
2.9 | % | ||
New York
|
2.5 | % | ||
Tennessee
|
2.5 | % | ||
Nevada
|
2.4 | % | ||
New Jersey
|
2.1 | % | ||
South Carolina
|
2.0 | % | ||
North Carolina
|
1.8 | % | ||
Michigan
|
1.6 | % | ||
Oklahoma
|
1.6 | % | ||
Other
|
14.0 | % |
Portfolio Composition4
(as a % of total investments)
|
||||
Health Care
|
20.9 | % | ||
Utilities
|
14.7 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
14.1 | % | ||
U.S. Guaranteed
|
12.4 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General
|
12.1 | % | ||
Transportation
|
10.2 | % | ||
Consumer Staples
|
6.1 | % | ||
Other
|
9.5 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
2
|
The Fund paid shareholders a capital gain and net ordinary income distribution in December 2009 of $0.0668 per share.
|
3
|
Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
4
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
NMO
|
Nuveen Municipal
|
Performance
|
Market Opportunity
|
OVERVIEW
|
Fund, Inc.
|
as of October 31, 2010
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||||
Common Share Price
|
$ | 14.55 | ||
Common Share
Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$ | 14.17 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
2.68 | % | ||
Market Yield
|
6.72 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
9.33 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
$ | 648,017 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years)
|
19.81 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration
|
10.90 |
Average Annual Total Return
(Inception 3/21/90) |
||||||||
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
|||||||
1-Year
|
17.03 | % | 11.71 | % | ||||
5-Year
|
6.76 | % | 4.56 | % | ||||
10-Year
|
7.66 | % | 5.93 | % |
States3
(as a % of total investments) |
||||
California
|
13.6 | % | ||
Illinois
|
10.0 | % | ||
Texas
|
6.5 | % | ||
Washington
|
5.9 | % | ||
Colorado
|
5.5 | % | ||
Ohio
|
5.3 | % | ||
Puerto Rico
|
5.0 | % | ||
Pennsylvania
|
4.7 | % | ||
South Carolina
|
4.0 | % | ||
Nevada
|
3.8 | % | ||
North Carolina
|
3.8 | % | ||
New York
|
3.2 | % | ||
New Jersey
|
2.7 | % | ||
North Dakota
|
2.4 | % | ||
Louisiana
|
2.1 | % | ||
Alaska
|
1.9 | % | ||
Michigan
|
1.9 | % | ||
Indiana
|
1.8 | % | ||
Virginia
|
1.7 | % | ||
Other
|
14.2 | % |
Portfolio Composition3
(as a % of total investments) |
||||
Health Care
|
18.2 | % | ||
Transportation
|
17.3 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General
|
15.5 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
13.6 | % | ||
Utilities
|
7.8 | % | ||
U.S. Guaranteed
|
7.6 | % | ||
Consumer Staples
|
7.3 | % | ||
Other
|
12.7 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
2
|
Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
3
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
NAD
|
Nuveen Dividend
|
Performance
|
Advantage
|
OVERVIEW
|
Municipal Fund
|
as of October 31, 2010
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||||
Common Share Price
|
$ | 14.40 | ||
Common Share
Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$ | 14.68 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
-1.91 | % | ||
Market Yield
|
6.33 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
8.79 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
$ | 576,895 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years)
|
17.56 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration
|
9.97 |
Average Annual Total Return
(Inception 5/26/99) |
||||||||
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
|||||||
1-Year
|
19.17 | % | 12.60 | % | ||||
5-Year
|
6.05 | % | 5.19 | % | ||||
10-Year
|
7.90 | % | 7.14 | % |
States3
(as a % of total municipal bonds) |
||||
Illinois
|
21.4 | % | ||
Washington
|
7.5 | % | ||
Florida
|
7.2 | % | ||
New York
|
5.3 | % | ||
California
|
5.1 | % | ||
Wisconsin
|
5.0 | % | ||
Louisiana
|
4.7 | % | ||
New Jersey
|
4.5 | % | ||
Texas
|
4.2 | % | ||
Puerto Rico
|
3.9 | % | ||
Colorado
|
3.8 | % | ||
Nevada
|
3.4 | % | ||
Michigan
|
3.0 | % | ||
Indiana
|
2.9 | % | ||
Ohio
|
2.8 | % | ||
Pennsylvania
|
2.3 | % | ||
Other
|
13.0 | % |
Portfolio Composition3
(as a % of total investments) |
||||
Health Care
|
21.5 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
20.8 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General
|
16.0 | % | ||
Transportation
|
13.0 | % | ||
Consumer Staples
|
6.0 | % | ||
Education and Civic Organizations
|
4.8 | % | ||
U.S. Guaranteed
|
4.6 | % | ||
Investment Companies
|
0.1 | % | ||
Other
|
13.2 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
2
|
Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
3
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
NXZ
|
Nuveen Dividend
|
Performance
|
Advantage
|
OVERVIEW
|
Municipal Fund 2
|
as of October 31, 2010
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||||
Common Share Price
|
$ | 14.67 | ||
Common Share
Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$ | 14.76 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
-0.61 | % | ||
Market Yield
|
6.54 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
9.08 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
$ | 434,764 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years)
|
15.42 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration
|
6.69 |
Average Annual Total Return
(Inception 3/27/01) |
||||||||
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
|||||||
1-Year
|
10.89 | % | 9.12 | % | ||||
5-Year
|
5.07 | % | 4.97 | % | ||||
Since Inception
|
6.33 | % | 6.82 | % |
States4
|
||||
(as a % of total investments)
|
||||
Texas
|
17.9 | % | ||
Illinois
|
11.2 | % | ||
California
|
8.9 | % | ||
Michigan
|
8.5 | % | ||
Colorado
|
6.2 | % | ||
New York
|
5.9 | % | ||
New Mexico
|
3.7 | % | ||
Louisiana
|
3.6 | % | ||
Minnesota
|
3.1 | % | ||
Alabama
|
3.0 | % | ||
Florida
|
2.9 | % | ||
Washington
|
2.8 | % | ||
Kansas
|
2.7 | % | ||
Pennsylvania
|
2.1 | % | ||
Oregon
|
2.1 | % | ||
Indiana
|
1.7 | % | ||
Other
|
13.7 | % |
Portfolio Composition4
|
||||
(as a % of total investments)
|
||||
U.S. Guaranteed
|
31.5 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
20.6 | % | ||
Health Care
|
14.0 | % | ||
Transportation
|
10.7 | % | ||
Consumer Staples
|
7.2 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General
|
4.5 | % | ||
Other
|
11.5 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
2
|
The Fund paid shareholders a net ordinary income distribution in December 2009 of $0.0139 per share.
|
3
|
Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
4
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
NZF
|
Nuveen Dividend
|
Performance
|
Advantage
|
OVERVIEW
|
Municipal Fund 3
|
as of October 31, 2010
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||||
Common Share Price
|
$ | 14.58 | ||
Common Share
Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$ | 14.74 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
-1.09 | % | ||
Market Yield
|
6.75 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
9.38 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
$ | 595,413 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years)
|
14.96 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration
|
5.93 |
Average Annual Total Return
(Inception 9/25/01) |
||||||||
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
|||||||
1-Year
|
17.04 | % | 11.41 | % | ||||
5-Year
|
6.79 | % | 5.45 | % | ||||
Since Inception
|
6.26 | % | 6.63 | % |
States4
(as a % of total municipal bonds) |
||||
Texas
|
14.7 | % | ||
Illinois
|
12.0 | % | ||
Washington
|
10.5 | % | ||
California
|
7.3 | % | ||
Michigan
|
6.4 | % | ||
Colorado
|
4.1 | % | ||
Indiana
|
3.9 | % | ||
Iowa
|
3.6 | % | ||
New Jersey
|
3.2 | % | ||
Louisiana
|
3.1 | % | ||
New York
|
3.1 | % | ||
Wisconsin
|
3.0 | % | ||
Kentucky
|
2.3 | % | ||
Massachusetts
|
2.0 | % | ||
Missouri
|
2.0 | % | ||
Nevada
|
1.8 | % | ||
Maryland
|
1.7 | % | ||
Georgia
|
1.5 | % | ||
Other
|
13.8 | % |
Portfolio Composition4
(as a % of total investments) |
||||
U.S. Guaranteed
|
23.7 | % | ||
Transportation
|
17.8 | % | ||
Health Care
|
15.8 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General
|
8.2 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
8.0 | % | ||
Utilities
|
4.8 | % | ||
Water and Sewer
|
4.6 | % | ||
Consumer Staples
|
4.1 | % | ||
Investment Companies
|
0.4 | % | ||
Other
|
12.6 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
2
|
The Fund paid shareholders a capital gain and net ordinary income distribution in December 2009 of $0.0645 per share.
|
3
|
Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
4
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
NPP
|
Shareholder Meeting Report
|
|
NMA
NMO
|
The annual meeting of shareholders was held on July 27, 2010 in the Lobby Conference Room, 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606; at this meeting the shareholders were asked to vote on the election of Board Members, the elimination of Fundamental Investment Policies and the approval of new Fundamental Investment Policies. The meeting for NPP was subsequently adjourned to September 9, 2010.
|
NPP
|
NMA
|
NMO
|
||||||||||
Common and
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Common and
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Common and Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
|||||||
To approve the elimination of the Fund’s fundamental policy relating to investments in municipal securities and below investment grade securities.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
28,384,032
|
1,716
|
—
|
—
|
21,192,999
|
2,764
|
||||||
Against
|
1,588,179
|
1,176
|
—
|
—
|
1,339,168
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
830,467
|
17
|
—
|
—
|
617,855
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
7,606,326
|
4,947
|
—
|
—
|
7,967,266
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
7,856
|
—
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
2,764
|
||||||
To approve the new fundamental policy relating to investments in municipal securities for the Fund.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
28,527,693
|
1,720
|
—
|
—
|
21,280,072
|
2,764
|
||||||
Against
|
1,370,126
|
1,160
|
—
|
—
|
1,189,246
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
904,859
|
29
|
—
|
—
|
680,706
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
7,606,326
|
4,947
|
—
|
—
|
7,967,264
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
7,856
|
—
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
2,764
|
||||||
To approve the elimination of the fundamental policy relating to investing in other investment companies.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
28,255,942
|
1,711
|
—
|
—
|
21,148,091
|
2,764
|
||||||
Against
|
1,571,658
|
1,169
|
—
|
—
|
1,289,569
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
975,078
|
29
|
—
|
—
|
712,365
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
7,606,326
|
4,947
|
—
|
—
|
7,967,263
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
7,856
|
—
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
2,764
|
||||||
To approve the elimination of the fundamental policy relating to derivatives and short sales.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
28,143,153
|
1,711
|
—
|
—
|
21,125,070
|
2,764
|
||||||
Against
|
1,729,919
|
1,177
|
—
|
—
|
1,399,712
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
929,606
|
21
|
—
|
—
|
625,241
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
7,606,326
|
4,947
|
—
|
—
|
7,967,265
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
7,856
|
—
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
2,764
|
||||||
To approve the elimination of the fundamental policy relating to commodities.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
28,151,297
|
1,711
|
—
|
—
|
21,120,466
|
2,764
|
||||||
Against
|
1,686,090
|
1,166
|
—
|
—
|
1,307,098
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
965,291
|
32
|
—
|
—
|
722,461
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
7,606,326
|
4,947
|
—
|
—
|
7,967,263
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
7,856
|
—
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
2,764
|
||||||
To approve the new fundamental policy relating to commodities.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
28,177,145
|
1,714
|
—
|
—
|
21,089,983
|
2,764
|
||||||
Against
|
1,632,444
|
1,163
|
—
|
—
|
1,325,419
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
993,089
|
32
|
—
|
—
|
734,623
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
7,606,326
|
4,947
|
—
|
—
|
7,967,263
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
7,856
|
—
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
2,764
|
NPP | NMA | NMO | ||||||||||
Common and
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Common and
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Common and Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
|||||||
Approval of the Board Members was reached as follows:
|
||||||||||||
John Amboian
|
||||||||||||
For
|
37,295,583
|
—
|
31,707,829
|
—
|
30,007,058
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
1,113,421
|
—
|
686,750
|
—
|
1,110,230
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
—
|
32,394,579
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
—
|
||||||
Robert P. Bremner
|
||||||||||||
For
|
37,297,224
|
—
|
31,588,697
|
—
|
29,986,898
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
1,111,780
|
—
|
805,882
|
—
|
1,130,390
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
—
|
32,394,579
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
—
|
||||||
Jack B. Evans
|
||||||||||||
For
|
37,327,664
|
—
|
31,573,835
|
—
|
30,016,956
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
1,081,340
|
—
|
820,744
|
—
|
1,100,332
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
—
|
32,394,579
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
—
|
||||||
William C. Hunter
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
5,593
|
—
|
2,018
|
—
|
2,464
|
||||||
Withhold
|
—
|
2,263
|
—
|
200
|
—
|
300
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
7,856
|
—
|
2,218
|
—
|
2,764
|
||||||
David J. Kundert
|
||||||||||||
For
|
37,306,638
|
—
|
31,581,694
|
—
|
29,978,064
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
1,102,366
|
—
|
812,885
|
—
|
1,139,224
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
—
|
32,394,579
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
—
|
||||||
William J. Schneider
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
5,593
|
—
|
2,018
|
—
|
2,464
|
||||||
Withhold
|
—
|
2,263
|
—
|
200
|
—
|
300
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
7,856
|
—
|
2,218
|
—
|
2,764
|
||||||
Judith M. Stockdale
|
||||||||||||
For
|
37,239,033
|
—
|
31,503,609
|
—
|
29,994,859
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
1,169,971
|
—
|
890,970
|
—
|
1,122,429
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
—
|
32,394,579
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
—
|
||||||
Carole E. Stone
|
||||||||||||
For
|
37,277,344
|
—
|
31,558,979
|
—
|
30,004,299
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
1,131,660
|
—
|
835,600
|
—
|
1,112,989
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
—
|
32,394,579
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
—
|
||||||
Terence J. Toth
|
||||||||||||
For
|
37,300,708
|
—
|
31,680,928
|
—
|
30,024,683
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
1,108,296
|
—
|
713,651
|
—
|
1,092,605
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
38,409,004
|
—
|
32,394,579
|
—
|
31,117,288
|
—
|
NAD
|
Shareholder Meeting Report (continued)
|
NXZ
|
|
NZF
|
NAD | NXZ | NZF | ||||||||||
Common and
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Common and
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Common and
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
|||||||
To approve the elimination of the Fund’s fundamental policy relating to investments in municipal securities and below investment grade securities.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Against
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
To approve the new fundamental policy relating to investments in municipal securities for the Fund.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Against
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
To approve the elimination of the fundamental policy relating to investing in other investment companies.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Against
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
To approve the elimination of the fundamental policy relating to derivatives and short sales.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Against
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
To approve the elimination of the fundamental policy relating to commodities.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Against
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
To approve the new fundamental policy relating to commodities.
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Against
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Abstain
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Broker Non-Votes
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
NAD
|
NXZ
|
NZF
|
||||||||||
Common and
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Common and
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Common and
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
Preferred
shares voting
together
as a class
|
|||||||
Approval of the Board Members was
|
||||||||||||
reached as follows:
|
||||||||||||
John Amboian
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Robert P. Bremner
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Jack B. Evans
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
William C. Hunter
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
9,340,366
|
—
|
980
|
—
|
4,264
|
||||||
Withhold
|
—
|
2,427,527
|
—
|
890
|
—
|
1,486
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
11,767,893
|
—
|
1,870
|
—
|
5,750
|
||||||
David J. Kundert
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
William J. Schneider
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
9,340,366
|
—
|
980
|
—
|
4,264
|
||||||
Withhold
|
—
|
2,427,527
|
—
|
890
|
—
|
1,486
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
11,767,893
|
—
|
1,870
|
—
|
5,750
|
||||||
Judith M. Stockdale
|
||||||||||||
For
|
43,921,868
|
—
|
26,365,545
|
—
|
34,915,348
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
3,305,705
|
—
|
569,455
|
—
|
782,960
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
47,227,573
|
—
|
26,935,000
|
—
|
35,698,308
|
—
|
||||||
Carole E. Stone
|
||||||||||||
For
|
43,983,468
|
—
|
26,368,565
|
—
|
34,946,092
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
3,244,105
|
—
|
566,435
|
—
|
752,216
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
47,227,573
|
—
|
26,935,000
|
—
|
35,698,308
|
—
|
||||||
Terence J. Toth
|
||||||||||||
For
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Withhold
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Nuveen Performance Plus Municipal Fund, Inc.
|
|
NPP
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||
Alabama – 0.1% (0.1% of Total Investments)
|
||||||||
Jefferson County, Alabama, Sewer Revenue Refunding Warrants, Series 1997A:
|
||||||||
$
|
1,435
|
5.625%, 2/01/22 – FGIC Insured
|
12/10 at 100.00
|
Caa3
|
$
|
592,712
|
||
1,505
|
5.375%, 2/01/27 – FGIC Insured
|
12/10 at 100.00
|
Caa3
|
605,206
|
||||
2,940
|
Total Alabama
|
1,197,918
|
||||||
Alaska – 0.2% (0.1% of Total Investments)
|
||||||||
2,465
|
Northern Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Alaska, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 6/01/46
|
6/14 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
1,732,476
|
||||
Arizona – 2.2% (1.5% of Total Investments)
|
||||||||
1,000
|
Arizona State Transportation Board, Highway Revenue Bonds, Series 2002B, 5.250%, 7/01/22 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12)
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,080,830
|
||||
7,780
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 7/01/40
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+
|
7,971,388
|
||||
Phoenix, Arizona, Civic Improvement Corporation, Senior Lien Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2002B:
|
||||||||
5,365
|
5.750%, 7/01/15 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
5,665,386
|
||||
5,055
|
5.750%, 7/01/16 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
5,305,627
|
||||
19,200
|
Total Arizona
|
20,023,231
|
||||||
Arkansas – 0.5% (0.4% of Total Investments)
|
||||||||
5,080
|
Independence County, Arkansas, Hydroelectric Power Revenue Bonds, Series 2003, 5.350%, 5/01/28 – ACA Insured
|
5/13 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
3,846,881
|
||||
1,000
|
Washington County, Arkansas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Washington Regional Medical Center, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 2/01/35
|
2/15 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
1,003,720
|
||||
6,080
|
Total Arkansas
|
4,850,601
|
||||||
California – 18.0% (12.1% of Total Investments)
|
||||||||
3,500
|
Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, California, Subordinate Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 0.000%, 10/01/25 – AMBAC Insured
|
10/17 at 100.00
|
A–
|
2,935,170
|
||||
11,000
|
Anaheim Public Finance Authority, California, Subordinate Lease Revenue Bonds, Public Improvement Project, Series 1997C, 0.000%, 9/01/20 – AGM Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA+
|
6,969,160
|
||||
California Department of Water Resources, Power Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A:
|
||||||||
4,000
|
6.000%, 5/01/15 (Pre-refunded 5/01/12)
|
5/12 at 101.00
|
Aaa
|
4,375,160
|
||||
3,175
|
5.375%, 5/01/22 (Pre-refunded 5/01/12)
|
5/12 at 101.00
|
Aaa
|
3,443,002
|
||||
3,365
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Adventist Health System/West, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 3/01/33
|
3/13 at 100.00
|
A
|
3,320,212
|
||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006:
|
||||||||
5,000
|
5.000%, 4/01/37
|
4/16 at 100.00
|
A+
|
4,963,550
|
||||
7,000
|
5.250%, 4/01/39
|
4/16 at 100.00
|
A+
|
7,068,670
|
||||
2,380
|
California Infrastructure Economic Development Bank, Revenue Bonds, J. David Gladstone Institutes, Series 2001, 5.250%, 10/01/34
|
10/11 at 101.00
|
A–
|
2,363,864
|
||||
2,330
|
California Municipal Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Eisenhower Medical Center, Series 2010A, 5.750%, 7/01/40
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
2,367,793
|
||||
3,700
|
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Series 2004C, 4.750%, 12/01/23 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
A3
|
3,707,733
|
||||
5,000
|
California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 3/01/31
|
3/16 at 100.00
|
A1
|
5,070,950
|
||||
6,435
|
California, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 6.000%,
4/01/16 – AMBAC Insured |
No Opt. Call
|
A1
|
7,656,556
|
||||
16,000
|
California, Various Purpose General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 6/01/37
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
A1
|
16,057,120
|
||||
5,000
|
Coast Community College District, Orange County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C, 0.000%, 8/01/32 – AGM Insured
|
8/18 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
4,349,450
|
||||
7,240
|
Desert Community College District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election 2004 Series 2007C, 0.000%, 8/01/28 – AGM Insured
|
8/17 at 56.01
|
AA+
|
2,614,292
|
|
Nuveen Performance Plus Municipal Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
|
NPP
|
Portfolio of Investments October 31, 2010
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||
California (continued)
|
||||||||
$
|
10,000
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2003A-1, 6.750%, 6/01/39 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13)
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
$
|
11,551,900
|
||
1,500
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-1, 5.125%, 6/01/47
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,081,065
|
||||
10,000
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-2, 0.000%, 6/01/37
|
6/22 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
6,602,300
|
||||
5,000
|
Los Angeles Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007C, 5.000%, 8/01/32 – FGIC Insured
|
8/17 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
5,246,350
|
||||
5,500
|
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, California, Waterworks Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.125%, 7/01/40 – FGIC Insured
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AA
|
5,583,380
|
||||
3,300
|
M-S-R Energy Authority, California, Gas Revenue Bonds, Citigroup Prepay Contracts, Series 2009B, 6.500%, 11/01/39
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
3,872,319
|
||||
1,000
|
Mt. Diablo Hospital District, California, Insured Hospital Revenue Bonds, Series 1993A, 5.125%, 12/01/23 – AMBAC Insured (ETM)
|
12/10 at 100.00
|
N/R (4)
|
1,135,280
|
||||
13,450
|
Ontario Redevelopment Financing Authority, San Bernardino County, California, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Redevelopment Project 1, Series 1995, 7.200%, 8/01/17 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
15,464,676
|
||||
2,325
|
Palmdale Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Restructured Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1986D, 8.000%, 4/01/16 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
2,999,645
|
||||
4,795
|
Palomar Pomerado Health, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2004, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 8/01/32 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+
|
4,866,014
|
||||
1,830
|
San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority, California, Water Utility Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 3504, 19.188%, 2/01/33 (IF)
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
2,501,024
|
||||
2,000
|
San Francisco Airports Commission, California, Revenue Refunding Bonds, San Francisco International Airport, Second Series 2001, Issue 27B, 5.125%, 5/01/26 – FGIC Insured
|
5/11 at 100.00
|
A1
|
2,012,540
|
||||
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, Orange County, California, Toll Road Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1997A:
|
||||||||
7,210
|
0.000%, 1/15/23 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
2,964,247
|
||||
3,000
|
0.000%, 1/15/35 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
469,410
|
||||
2,875
|
Tobacco Securitization Authority of Northern California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2005A-1, 4.750%, 6/01/23
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
2,715,783
|
||||
5,245
|
Vacaville Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 8/01/30 – NPFG Insured
|
8/15 at 100.00
|
A+
|
5,373,817
|
||||
12,380
|
Walnut Valley Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1997A, 7.200%, 2/01/16 – NPFG Insured
|
8/11 at 103.00
|
AA–
|
13,346,383
|
||||
176,535
|
Total California
|
165,048,815
|
||||||
Colorado – 9.5% (6.4% of Total Investments)
|
||||||||
5,240
|
Adams 12 Five Star Schools, Adams County, Colorado, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 12/15/24 – AGM Insured
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
5,679,007
|
||||
3,000
|
Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Peak-to-Peak Charter School, Series 2004, 5.250%, 8/15/34 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
8/14 at 100.00
|
A
|
3,019,740
|
||||
10,000
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Health Facilities Revenue Bonds, Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health Services Corporation, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 1/01/40
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
10,220,800
|
||||
7,660
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds, Boulder Community Hospital, Series 1994B, 5.875%, 10/01/23 – NPFG Insured
|
12/10 at 100.00
|
A2
|
7,667,507
|
||||
5,860
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Catholic Health Initiatives, Series 2001, 5.250%, 9/01/21 (Pre-refunded 9/01/11)
|
9/11 at 100.00
|
Aa2 (4)
|
6,099,147
|
||||
4,500
|
Denver City and County, Colorado, Airport System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2001A, 5.500%, 11/15/16 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
A+
|
4,684,995
|
||||
20,000
|
Denver Convention Center Hotel Authority, Colorado, Senior Revenue Bonds, Convention Center Hotel, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 12/01/33 (Pre-refunded 12/01/13) – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
12/13 at 100.00
|
N/R (4)
|
22,322,200
|
||||
13,055
|
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Senior Revenue Bonds, Series 1997B, 0.000%,9/01/21 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
7,071,632
|
22 Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||
Colorado (continued)
|
||||||||
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Senior Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B:
|
||||||||
$
|
16,200
|
0.000%, 9/01/32 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
$
|
3,857,382
|
||
33,120
|
0.000%, 9/01/33 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
7,319,851
|
||||
18,500
|
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Toll Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 0.000%, 3/01/36 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
3,349,055
|
||||
755
|
Jefferson County School District R1, Colorado, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 12/15/22 (Pre-refunded 12/15/14) – AGM Insured (UB)
|
12/14 at 100.00
|
AA+ (4)
|
877,348
|
||||
3,750
|
Regional Transportation District, Colorado, Denver Transit Partners Eagle P3 Project Private Activity Bonds, Series 2010, 6.000%, 1/15/41
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
3,967,350
|
||||
1,330
|
University of Colorado Hospital Authority, Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A, 5.000%, 11/15/29 – AMBAC Insured
|
11/10 at 100.00
|
A3
|
1,327,540
|
||||
142,970
|
Total Colorado
|
87,463,554
|
||||||
District of Columbia – 1.0% (0.7% of Total Investments)
|
||||||||
4,545
|
District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Corporation, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2001, 6.250%, 5/15/24
|
5/11 at 101.00
|
BBB
|
4,563,362
|
||||
5,000
|
Washington Convention Center Authority, District of Columbia, Senior Lien Dedicated Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 4.500%, 10/01/30 – AMBAC Insured
|
10/16 at 100.00
|
A1
|
5,000,350
|
||||
9,545
|
Total District of Columbia
|
9,563,712
|
||||||
Florida – 7.0% (4.7% of Total Investments)
|
||||||||
1,700
|
Beacon Tradeport Community Development District, Miami-Dade County, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Commercial Project, Series 2002A, 5.625%, 5/01/32 – RAAI Insured
|
5/12 at 102.00
|
N/R
|
1,704,012
|
||||
Broward County Housing Finance Authority, Florida, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Venice Homes Apartments, Series 2001A:
|
||||||||
1,545
|
5.700%, 1/01/32 – AGM Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/11 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
1,552,138
|
||||
1,805
|
5.800%, 1/01/36 – AGM Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/11 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
1,813,682
|
||||
5,300
|
Escambia County Health Facilities Authority, Florida, Revenue Bonds, Ascension Health Credit Group, Series 2003A, 5.250%, 11/15/14
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa1
|
6,077,086
|
||||
1,995
|
Florida Housing Finance Corporation, Homeowner Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2000-11, 5.850%, 1/01/22 – AGM Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
1/11 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
1,997,574
|
||||
4,170
|
Florida Housing Finance Corporation, Homeowner Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2006-2, 4.950%, 7/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
1/16 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
4,230,507
|
||||