SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant /X/
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / /
Check the appropriate box:
/ / Preliminary Proxy Statement
/X/ Definitive Proxy Statement
/ / Definitive Additional Materials
/ / Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
/ / Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted
by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
/X/ No fee required.
/ / Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
----------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction
applies:
----------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how
it was determined):
----------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
----------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
----------------------------------------------------------
/ / Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
/ / Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which
the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
----------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
----------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
----------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
----------------------------------------------------------
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
25 FIRST STREET
CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02141
Dear Stockholder:
I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of Art Technology Group, Inc. on May 14, 2001. We will hold the meeting at
10:00 a.m. at the offices of Hale and Dorr LLP, 60 State Street, 26th Floor,
Boston, Massachusetts. Annual meetings play an important role in maintaining
communications and understanding among our management, board of directors and
stockholders, and I hope that you will be able to join us.
On the pages following this letter you will find the Notice of Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which lists the matters to be considered at the
meeting, and the proxy statement, which describes the matters listed in the
Notice. We have also enclosed our 2000 Annual Report.
If you are a stockholder of record, we have enclosed your proxy card, which
allows you to vote on the matters considered at the meeting. Simply mark, sign
and date your proxy card, and then mail the completed proxy card to our transfer
agent, EquiServe, L.P., in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. You may attend
the meeting and vote in person even if you have sent in a proxy card.
If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of
record, you will receive instructions from the holder of record that you must
follow in order for your shares to be voted.
Sincerely yours,
Joe Chung
Chief Technology Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
THE ABILITY TO HAVE YOUR VOTE COUNTED AT THE MEETING IS AN IMPORTANT
STOCKHOLDER RIGHT, AND I HOPE YOU WILL CAST YOUR VOTE IN PERSON OR BY
PROXY REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU HOLD.
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
25 FIRST STREET
CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02109
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Time and Date............................. 10:00 a.m. on Monday, May 14, 2001
Place..................................... Hale and Dorr LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts
Items of Business......................... At the meeting, we will ask you and our other
stockholders to:
(1) Elect two directors to three-year terms.
(2) Approve an amendment to increase the number of
shares of common stock reserved under our Amended and
Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan from 19,600,000 to
25,600,000.
(3) Approve amendments to our by-laws to authorize the
use of electronic or remote communications for specified
corporate purposes.
(4) Ratify the selection of Arthur Andersen LLP as our
independent accountants for fiscal 2001.
(5) Transact any other business properly presented at
the meeting.
Record Date............................... You can vote if you were a stockholder of record at the
close of business on March 26, 2001.
Proxy Voting.............................. It is important that your shares be represented and
voted at the meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend
the meeting, please mark, sign, date and promptly mail
your proxy card to our transfer agent, EquiServe, L.P.,
in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. You may revoke
your proxy at any time prior to its exercise at the
meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Jeet Singh
Secretary
Cambridge, Massachusetts
April 17, 2001
INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING
THIS PROXY STATEMENT
We have sent you this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card because
our board of directors is soliciting your proxy to vote at our 2001 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. The
meeting will be held at 10 a.m., local time, on Monday, May 14, 2001, at the
offices of Hale and Dorr LLP, 60 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts.
- THIS PROXY STATEMENT summarizes information about the proposals to be
considered at the meeting and other information you may find useful in
determining how to vote.
- THE PROXY CARD is the means by which you actually authorize another person
to vote your shares in accordance with the instructions.
Our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies in person or by
telephone, mail, electronic mail, facsimile or telegram. We will pay the
expenses of soliciting proxies, although we will not pay additional compensation
to these individuals for soliciting proxies. We will request banks, brokers and
other nominees holding shares for a beneficial owner to forward copies of the
proxy materials to those beneficial owners and to request instructions for
voting those shares. We will reimburse these banks, brokers and other nominees
for their related reasonable expenses. We have not retained the services of any
proxy solicitation firm to assist us in soliciting proxies.
We are mailing this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card to
stockholders for the first time on April 17, 2001. In this mailing, we are
including a copy of our 2000 Annual Report to Stockholders.
WHO MAY VOTE
Holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 26,
2001 are entitled to one vote per share on each matter properly brought before
the meeting.
A list of stockholders entitled to vote will be available at the meeting. In
addition, you may contact our Secretary, Jeet Singh, to make arrangements to
review a copy of the stockholder list at the offices of Hale and Dorr LLP, 60
State Street, Boston, Massachusetts, prior to the meeting, between the hours of
8:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., local time, on any business day from May 4, 2001 up to
the time of the meeting.
HOW TO VOTE
You may vote your shares at the meeting in person or by proxy:
- TO VOTE IN PERSON, you must attend the meeting, and then complete and
submit the ballot provided at the meeting.
- TO VOTE BY PROXY, you must mark, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and
then mail the proxy card to our transfer agent, EquiServe, L.P. Your proxy
will be valid only if you complete and return the proxy card before the
meeting. By completing and returning the proxy card, you will direct the
designated persons to vote your shares at the meeting in the manner you
specify in the proxy card. If you complete the proxy card with the
exception of the voting instructions, then the designated persons will
vote your shares for the election of the nominated director,
2
the amendment of the 1996 Stock Option Plan, the amendment of the by-laws
and the ratification of the independent accountants. If any other business
properly comes before the meeting, the designated persons will have the
discretion to vote your shares as they deem appropriate.
Even if you complete and return a proxy card, you may revoke it at any time
before it is exercised by taking one of the following actions:
- send written notice to Jeet Singh, our Secretary, at our address as set
forth in the Notice appearing before this proxy statement;
- send us another signed proxy with a later date; or
- attend the meeting, notify our Secretary that you are present, and then
vote by ballot.
IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD IN THE NAME OF A BANK, BROKER OR OTHER NOMINEE
HOLDER, you will receive instructions from the holder of record explaining how
your shares may be voted. Please note that, in such an event, you must obtain a
proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote at
the meeting.
QUORUM REQUIRED TO TRANSACT BUSINESS
At the close of business on March 26, 2001, 68,315,484 shares of our common
stock were outstanding. Our by-laws require that a majority of the shares of our
common stock outstanding on that date be represented, in person or by proxy, at
the meeting in order to constitute the quorum we need to transact business. We
will count abstentions and broker non-votes in determining whether a quorum
exists. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial
owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have
discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not received
instructions from the beneficial owner.
3
PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF CLASS II DIRECTORS
The first proposal on the agenda for the meeting is the election of two
individuals to serve as Class II directors for three-year terms beginning at the
meeting and ending at our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our by-laws
provide that the board is to be divided into three classes serving for staggered
three-year terms.
The board has nominated Scott A. Jones and Thomas N. Matlack, current
Class II directors, for re-election. Brief biographies of Messrs. Jones and
Matlack, each as of March 31, 2001, follow. You will find information about
Messrs. Jones' and Matlack's stock holdings on page 13.
SCOTT A. JONES................. Mr. Jones has served as a director since November 1997.
Since co-founding Escient, Inc., a company focusing on
Internet applications related to entertainment in the home,
in July 1996, Mr. Jones has served as its Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman. After co-founding Boston Technology,
Inc. in 1986, Mr. Jones served as its Chairman and Chief
Scientist until 1992. Since 1994, he has also been a
principal of Threshold Technologies, Inc., a consulting
firm, and King Air Charters, Inc., an air charter company.
Mr. Jones is 39 years old.
THOMAS N. MATLACK.............. Mr. Matlack has served as a director since November 1997.
Since August 1998, he has been a Managing Partner at
Megunticook Management LLC, a private investment fund. From
1992 to February 1997, he held various positions with the
Providence Journal Company, including Chief Financial
Officer from April 1996 to February 1997, Vice President,
Finance from September 1995 to April 1996, and Director,
Financial Planning and Analysis from 1992 to September 1995.
Mr. Matlack is 36 years old.
We expect that both Mr. Jones and Mr. Matlack will be able to serve if
elected. If either one is not able to serve, proxies may be voted for a
substitute nominee. The board of directors may, following the Annual Meeting,
elect an additional Class II director, as provided in our by-laws.
The nominees receiving the greatest number of votes cast will be elected as
directors. We will not count abstentions when we tabulate votes cast for the
directors election. Brokers have discretionary voting power with respect to
director elections.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE
Our Class I and Class III directors will continue in office following the
Meeting. The terms of our Class I directors will expire upon our 2003 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, and the terms of our Class III directors will expire
upon our 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Brief biographies of these
directors, as of March 31, 2001, follow. You will find information about their
holdings of common stock on page 13.
4
JOSEPH T. CHUNG................ Mr. Chung co-founded our company with Jeet Singh in 1991 and
is our Chief Technology Officer, Treasurer and Chairman of
the Board. He is one of our Class III directors. Previously,
Mr. Chung was the technical director and chief technology
designer of the hyperinstrument group at the MIT Media Lab
and held engineering positions at Apple Computer and Digital
Equipment Corporation. Mr. Chung is 36 years old.
JEET SINGH..................... Mr. Singh co-founded our company with Joseph Chung in 1991
and is our Chief Executive Officer and a Class III director.
Previously, Mr. Singh held marketing positions with Boston
Technology, Inc., a manufacturer of advanced voice
processing computers, Team Technologies, a Washington,
D.C.-based consulting firm specializing in workgroup
productivity, and Groupe Bull/Bull Corporation of America.
Mr. Singh is 37 years old.
PHYLLIS S. SWERSKY............. Ms. Swerksy has been one of our Class I directors since May
2000. Since 1995 she has been President of The Meltech
Group, a consulting firm specializing in business advisory
services for high-growth potential businesses. She was
President of The Net Collaborative, Inc., an Internet
systems integration company, from 1996 to 1997. She served
as President of Work/Family Directions, Inc., a provider of
employee benefits programs, from 1992 through 1995. Prior to
1992, she was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of AICorp, Inc., a computer software company. Ms.
Swersky also serves as a director of Investor Financial
Services, Inc. Ms. Swersky is 49 years old.
ROBERT F. WALTERS.............. Mr. Walters has been one of our Class I directors since May
2000. Since 1995 he has been Senior Vice President and Chief
Information Officer of the John Hancock Financial Services.
Prior to Hancock, Mr. Walters held various key positions at
Citibank, both domestically and overseas. Before joining
Citibank, Mr. Walters held various senior technology
management positions at Bankers Trust Co. and Marine Midland
Bank. Mr. Walters is 52 years old.
BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Our board of directors met 11 times in 2000. Mr. Jones attended 73% of the
total number of board meetings, and each of the other directors attended at
least 75% of those meetings. The board has three standing committees: an Audit
Committee, a Compensation Committee and an Employee Stock Option Committee.
The Audit Committee reviews our financial reporting and internal controls
and policies, recommends the selection of independent accountants, reviews the
overall plan and scope of the independent audit, and provides the opportunity
for direct contact between our independent accountants and the board. The Audit
Committee acts under a written charter first adopted and approved on June 12,
2000 and attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A. The Audit Committee met
6 times during 2000. The current Audit Committee members are Mr. Matlack and
Ms. Swersky.
5
Each of the members of the Audit Committee attended at least 75% of the meetings
of the Audit Committee in 2000.
The Compensation Committee reviews, and recommends to the board for
approval, the compensation programs for the Chief Executive Officer, other
executive officers and key employees. The Compensation Committee also
administers our bonus and incentive plans and programs, including stock option
and stock purchase plans. The Compensation Committee met 7 times during 2000,
either in person, by telephonic meeting or by means of written consent. The
current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Jones, Lax and Matlack
and Ms. Swersky. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee attended at
least 75% of the meetings of the Compensation Committee in 2000.
The Employee Stock Option Committee is responsible for granting stock
options to our employees, other than our executive officers. The current member
of the Employee Stock Option Committee is Mr. Singh.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee of the board of directors is composed of two members and
acts under a written charter adopted by the board of directors and attached to
this proxy statement as Appendix A. The members of the Audit Committee are
independent directors, as defined by the charter and the rules of the Nasdaq
Stock Market.
The Audit Committee reviewed our audited financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2000 and discussed these financial statements with our
management. The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed the audited
financial statements and the matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards
61, COMMUNICATION WITH AUDIT COMMITTEES, with Arthur Andersen, our independent
auditors. SAS 61 requires our independent auditors to discuss with our Audit
Committee, among other things, the following:
- methods to account for significant unusual transactions;
- the effect of significant accounting policies in controversial or emerging
areas for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus;
- the process used by management in formulating particularly sensitive
accounting estimates and the basis for the auditors' conclusions regarding
the reasonableness of those estimates; and
- disagreements, of which there were none, with management over the
application of accounting principles, the basis for management's
accounting estimates and the disclosures in the financial statements.
Our independent auditors also provided the Audit Committee with the written
disclosures and the letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1, INDEPENDENCE DISCUSSIONS WITH AUDIT COMMITTEES. This Standard requires
auditors annually to disclose in writing all relationships that in the auditor's
professional opinion may reasonably be thought to bear on independence, confirm
their perceived independence and engage in a discussion of independence. In
addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors their
independence from our company.
6
Based on its discussions with management and the independent auditors, and
its review of the representations and information provided by management and the
independent auditors, the Audit Committee recommended to the board of directors
that the audited financial statements be included in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Thomas N. Matlack
Phyllis S. Swersky
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Messrs. Jones, Matlack and Lax and Ms. Swersky served on the Compensation
Committee during 2000. None of these directors was, during or before 2000, an
officer or employee of our company or of any of our affiliates. None of our
executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation
committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as
members of our board of directors or Compensation Committee.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
During 2000, we paid no cash compensation to any of our directors. In order
to attract and retain directors in a competitive environment, as of January 1,
2001, we began paying a cash retainer of $10,000 per year to our non-employee
directors and additional payments of $1,000 for each meeting attended by those
directors. In order to attract new directors from larger and more sophisticated
companies and to compensate committee chairpersons for the additional work
imposed by this role, on March 26, 2001, the board of directors voted to
increase the annual retainer for each non-employee director to $25,000; to
provide an additional annual retainer of $10,000 to each non-employee committee
chairperson; and to continue paying each non-employee director $1,000 for each
meeting attended by that director. We do not reimburse directors for travel and
living expenses for attending regular board meetings and committee meetings.
The board of directors adopted our 1999 Outside Director Stock Option Plan
in May 1999, and it was approved by our stockholders in June 1999. Under the
plan, individuals who become directors and are not our employees receive an
option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock on the date of his or her
initial election to our board. The exercise price of such option is equal to the
closing price per share of our common stock on the date of such director's
election. In addition, each of our continuing non-employee directors receives an
option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock on the date of each annual
meeting of stockholders, at an exercise price equal to the closing price per
share of the common stock on the date of the annual meeting. All options granted
under the director plan are fully vested upon grant.
7
INFORMATION ABOUT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Our executive officers are elected by the board of directors and hold office
until the first meeting of the board following the annual meeting of
stockholders. Brief biographies of our executive officers follow. The ages of
the executive officers are given as of March 31, 2001. You will find information
about their holdings of common stock on page 13.
JEET SINGH..................... Chief Executive Officer. You will find background
information about Mr. Singh on page 5.
JOSEPH T. CHUNG................ Chief Technology Officer, Treasurer and Chairman of the
Board. You will find background information about Mr. Chung
on page 5.
ANN C. BRADY................... Ms. Brady has been Chief Financial Officer since April 1999
and Vice President, Finance since January 1998. From May
1997 to January 1998 she was Director of Finance. From 1992
to May 1997, Ms. Brady was head of Finance and Accounting
for HPR, Inc., a software and consulting services company,
subsequently acquired by McKesson/HBOC. Ms. Brady is 37
years old.
PAUL G. SHORTHOSE.............. Mr. Shorthose has been Chief Operating Officer since June
1999 and President since February 2000. From July 1998 to
June 1999, he was Vice President of Marketing and Business
Development for Context Integration, Inc., a
software-related consulting services company. From August
1997 to July 1998, Mr. Shorthose served as our Vice
President, Worldwide Services. From April 1992 to August
1997, Mr. Shorthose was Vice President/General Manager for
the Northeast U.S. and Canada Professional Services
Organization of Sybase, Inc., a software and consulting
services company. Mr. Shorthose is 44 years old.
WILLIAM WITTENBERG............. Mr. Wittenberg has been Senior Vice President, Product
Development since March 1998. From April 1996 to March 1998,
he was Vice President, Engineering. From 1991 to January
1995, Mr. Wittenberg was Director of Product Management and
User Interface Design for Lotus Development Corporation. Mr.
Wittenberg is 42 years old.
LAUREN J. KELLEY............... Ms. Kelley has been Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales
since February 2000. From December 1996 to February 2000,
she was Vice President, Sales. From September 1996 to
December 1996, she worked as a consultant to our company on
the European market. From July 1995 to December 1996, Ms.
Kelley was a Principal with TechConnect Strategies, Inc., an
international business development firm. From January 1994
to July 1995, Ms. Kelley was General Manager at Borland
International in Paris, France. Ms. Kelley is 41 years old.
8
IAN REID....................... Mr. Reid has been Vice President, Marketing since March
2000. From November 1998 to March 2000, he was an
independent marketing consultant for internet industry
companies. From May 1996 to October 1998, he was Vice
President, Field and Channel Marketing for Open Market,
Inc., an internet e-commerce company. From January 1996 to
May 1996, Mr. Reid was a consultant to Open Market. Mr. Reid
is 48 years old.
BERNARD BAILEY................. Mr. Bailey has been Senior Vice President, Worldwide
Services since January 2001. From April 1984 to January
2001, he held various positions with IBM Corporation in
which he was responsible for the sales and delivery of
services offerings. In particular, from October 2000 to
January 2001, he was Sector Operations and Strategy
Executive, IBM Global Services, Business Innovation
Services, Public Sector. From January 2000 to October 2000
he was Director of Delivery Operations, IBM Global Services,
Business Innovation Services, Southern Region. From January
1997 to January 1999, Mr. Bailey was Director, Integration
Services, Chesapeake Bay Marketplace. From August 1995 to
January 1996, he was Solution Executive, EDMS Group, Process
and Petroleum Industry Solution Unit. Mr. Bailey is 47 years
old.
9
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth information with respect to the annual and
long-term compensation that we paid for the past three years to the following
persons, who are referred to as our named executive officers:
- Jeet Singh, our chief executive officer; and
- Joseph T. Chung, Paul G. Shorthose, Ann C. Brady and William Wittenberg,
our four other most highly compensated executive officers.
We did not grant stock options to any of the named executive officers during
2000.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG-TERM
ANNUAL COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION AWARDS
-------------------- ------------
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY($) BONUS($) OPTIONS(#)
--------------------------- -------- --------- -------- ------------
2000 $220,000 $105,871 --
Jeet Singh................................................. 1999 150,000 80,000 --
Chief Executive Officer 1998 150,000 3,038 --
2000 220,000 --
Joseph T. Chung............................................ 1999 150,000 80,000 --
Chief Technology Officer and Treasurer 1998 150,000 -- --
2000 200,769 -- --
Paul G. Shorthose.......................................... 1999 92,769 55,000 1,150,000
President and Chief Operating Officer 1998 88,846 60,000 --
2000 181,538 -- --
Ann C. Brady............................................... 1999 131,560 -- 289,998
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer 1998 125,000 -- 124,500
2000 180,000 -- --
William Wittenberg......................................... 1999 148,462 -- 180,000
Senior Vice President, Product Development 1998 138,846 -- 181,860
The amount reflected as a bonus for Mr. Singh in 1998 represents imputed
interest on an interest-free loan extended to him. Mr. Shorthose resigned as our
Vice President, Services in August 1998 and rejoined us as Chief Operating
Officer in June 1999.
10
The following table sets forth information regarding options exercised in
2000 by the named executive officers. The per-share value of unexercised
in-the-money options is calculated by subtracting the option exercise price from
$30.56, the last reported sale price of the common stock on December 29, 2000.
TOTAL OPTION EXERCISES DURING 2000 AND YEAR-END VALUES
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS
OPTIONS AT DECEMBER 31, 2000 AT DECEMBER 31, 2000
SHARES --------------------------------- ---------------------------------
ACQUIRED ON VALUE
NAME EXERCISE (#) REALIZED ($) EXERCISABLE(#) UNEXERCISABLE(#) EXERCISABLE($) UNEXERCISABLE($)
---- ------------ ------------ -------------- ---------------- -------------- ----------------
Jeet Singh........... -- -- -- -- -- --
Joseph T. Chung...... -- -- -- -- -- --
Paul G. Shorthose.... 130,000 9,029,000 355,000 625,000 9,074,688 15,976,563
Ann C. Brady......... 125,000 9,262,332 69,587 233,315 1,965,192 6,450,634
William Wittenberg... 251,000 21,547,673 211,438 108,750 6,341,714 3,228,984
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee consists entirely of directors who are not
officers or employees of our company or of any of our affiliates. The
Compensation Committee establishes the salaries and other compensation for our
executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and the other named
executive officers. The Compensation Committee also administers our stock option
and stock purchase plans.
GENERAL COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY. Our executive compensation program is
designed to:
- retain executive officers by paying them competitively, motivating them to
contribute to our success and rewarding them for their performance;
- link a substantial part of each executive officer's compensation to our
performance; and
- encourage ownership of our common stock by executive officers, to further
tie the interests of management to the interests of our stockholders.
The Compensation Committee applies these principles in determining annual
compensation opportunities and payments for the named executive officers and our
other executive officers.
ESTABLISHING TOTAL COMPENSATION OPPORTUNITIES. In determining total annual
compensation opportunities for the named executive officers, the Compensation
Committee considers many factors, including:
- the experience and compensation history of the executive officer;
- our performance as measured by revenues, earnings and total stockholder
return compared to that of other companies in the Internet software
industry; and
- the total annual compensation paid by competitors in the Internet software
industry to their senior management.
11
BALANCING THE ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION. The Compensation Committee seeks to
balance three elements--salaries, bonuses and stock options. The Compensation
Committee also tries to align the compensation opportunities of executive
officers closely with the interests of our stockholders in allocating
compensation opportunities among these elements. Therefore, bonuses are tied to
our performance, as measured by revenues and earnings. The Compensation
Committee also relies on recommendations made by executive compensation
specialists from an outside consulting firm.
Salaries for each of the named executive officers are based on the
Compensation Committee's evaluation of:
- the executive officer's job performance;
- the executive officer's contribution to our growth and profitability;
- any increase in the executive officer's responsibilities, whether as a
result of our growth or a reassignment of responsibilities;
- the success of the management team in achieving our short-term and
long-term goals;
- the importance of the executive officer to the future growth and
profitability;
- the salaries and total compensation mix paid to executive officers holding
equivalent positions by companies in our peer group; and
- the experience and compensation history of the executive officer.
To determine the size of option grants to our executive officers, the
Compensation Committee relies on recommendations made by the executive
compensation specialists at an outside consulting firm. The exercise price for
all stock options granted to executive officers equals the market value of the
underlying shares on the date of grant. Therefore, ultimately, the stock options
have value only if the value of the underlying shares increases.
As Chief Executive Officer for 2000, Jeet Singh received salary compensation
of $220,000 and a cash bonus of $105,871. Mr. Singh's annual salary for 2000 was
determined based on an assessment of comparative industry salaries using
established executive compensation surveys. Mr. Singh's cash bonus was
determined objectively based on our performance in 2000.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows us from
taking any tax deduction for compensation exceeding $1,000,000 paid to any of
the named executive officers. The limit does not apply, however, to compensation
we pay upon our attainment of performance goals under a program approved by the
stockholders. The Compensation Committee intends that compensation attributable
to stock options granted under the 1996 plan meet the requirements of
Section 162(m), and therefore believes that these amounts will be deductible by
us for federal income tax purposes.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Thomas N. Matlack
Scott A. Jones
Charles R. Lax
Phyllis S. Swersky
12
INFORMATION ABOUT STOCK OWNERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE
The following table sets forth certain information as of January 31, 2001,
with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by:
- each person known by us to own beneficially more than five percent of the
outstanding shares of common stock;
- each of our directors;
- each of our named executive officers; and
- all directors and executive officers as a group.
SHARES SHARES TOTAL
BENEFICIALLY ACQUIRABLE BENEFICIAL PERCENT
BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNED(1) WITHIN 60 DAYS OWNERSHIP OWNERSHIP(2)
---------------- ------------ -------------- ---------- ------------
FMR Corp.(3)......................... 10,161,520 -- 10,161,520 15.0%
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Jeet Singh........................... 6,379,000 -- 6,379,000 9.4
Joseph T. Chung...................... 6,358,000 -- 6,358,432 9.3
Putnam Investments, LLC(4)........... 3,587,270 -- 3,587,270 5.3
One Post Office Square
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Putnam Investment Management, 3,448,570 -- 3,448,570 5.1
LLC(4).............................
One Post Office Square
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Scott A. Jones....................... 640,683 15,000 655,683 *
William Wittenberg................... 197,741 263,938 461,679 *
Paul G. Shorthose.................... 2,281 357,500 359,781 *
Ann C. Brady......................... 45,027 61,772 106,799 *
Charles R. Lax....................... -- 15,000 15,000 *
Phyllis S. Swersky................... 2,200 10,000 12,200 *
Robert F. Walters(5)................. 28 10,000 10,028 *
Thomas N. Matlack.................... -- 5,000 5,000 *
All directors and executive officers
as a group (11 persons)............ 13,658,117 910,983 14,569,100 21.1
------------------------
* Less than 1%.
(1) The inclusion of any shares of common stock deemed beneficially owned does
not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership of such shares. Unless
otherwise indicated, each person listed above has sole voting and/or
investment power with respect to the shares listed.
(2) In calculating the percent of our common stock beneficially owned by each
person or entity listed, the number of shares deemed outstanding consists of
the 68,047,122 shares actually outstanding as of January 31, 2001, plus, for
that person or entity only, any shares subject to options that were
exercisable on, or within 60 days after, January 31, 2001.
13
(3) Beneficial ownership as reported in an amendment to a Schedule 13G filed
with the SEC on February 13, 2001.
(4) Beneficial ownership as reported in an amendment to a Schedule 13G filed
with the SEC on February 15, 2001.
(5) Includes 28 shares held by Mr. Walters' son. Mr. Walters disclaims
beneficial ownership for these shares.
COMPLIANCE WITH REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors
and executive officers to file reports of holdings and transactions in our
equity securities with the SEC. We are also required to identify any director or
executive officer who fails to timely file with the SEC any required report
relating to ownership or changes in ownership of our equity securities. Certain
securities held by Lauren Kelley, our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales,
were inadvertently omitted from her Form 3 in February 2000. The omission was
corrected on Form 5 filed in April 2001, which was after the Form 5 filing
deadline, for year end 2000. Twenty-eight shares held by the son of Robert
Walters, one of our directors, which may be attributed to Mr. Walters, were
omitted from his Form 3 which was due in May 2000 but was filed in July 2000.
These shares were reported on a Form 4 filed in October 2000. Due to an
administrative error, an option exercise and a subsequent sale of securities in
May 2000 by Ann Brady, our Chief Financial Officer, was not filed on a timely
basis. These transactions were reported on Form 5 filed in April 2001 for year
end 2000. The Form 3 for Phyllis Swersky, one of our directors, due in
May 2000, was filed in September 2000. Forms 5 for year 2000 for Joseph Chung,
our Chief Technology Officer, Charles Lax, one or our directors and Ian Reid,
our Vice President, Marketing, were filed in April 2001. Messrs. Scott Jones,
Thomas Matlack, Jeffrey Newton, Paul Shorthose, Jeet Singh, William Wittenberg,
and Mesdames Brady and Kelley each reported on Form 5 filed in April 2000 for
year end 2000, information to correct administrative or mathematical errors that
appeared in various Form 4 reports filed during 2000. In addition, required
reports for all of our directors and executive officers were mailed, rather then
filed, on the filing deadline and therefore were filed with the SEC one to four
days late.
14
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our
common stock during the period from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000 with
the cumulative total return of (i) the Nasdaq National Market Index and (ii) a
Peer Group Index* over the same period. This comparison assumes the investment
of $100 on July 21, 1999 in our common stock, the Nasdaq National Market Index
and the Peer Group Index and assumes dividends, if any, are reinvested.
EDGAR REPRESENTATION OF DATA POINTS USED IN PRINTED GRAPHIC
DOLLARS
DOLLARS
7/21/99 9/30/99 12/31/99 3/31/00 6/30/00 9/29/00 12/29/00
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. 100.00 210.73 719.72 727.33 1117.64 1049.13 338.41
INTERNET SOFTWARE AND SVCS 100.00 118.68 215.87 211.09 132.38 118.81 51.24
NASDAQ MARKET INDEX 100.00 103.58 152.98 174.07 149.71 138.16 92.84
* Peer Group Index reflects the stock performance of the 339 publicly traded
companies which comprise the Media General Index Group 852 (Internet
Software and Services).
PROPOSAL TWO: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT OF 1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN
On April 5, 2001, the board of directors voted to increase the number of
shares authorized for issuance under our Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option
Plan by 6,000,000, from 19,600,000 shares to 25,600,000 shares. The board
determined that this amendment, referred to below as the Plan Amendment, was
critical to our future success for the reasons described below and that the Plan
Amendment therefore should not be subject to stockholder approval.
The board has submitted the Plan Amendment for approval by our stockholders
in order to enable us to issue additional incentive stock options intended to
qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. If the Plan Amendment is
not approved by our stockholders by April 5, 2002, we will
15
be able to issue only non-statutory stock options, and not incentive stock
options, to purchase the additional 6,000,000 shares reserved for issuance
pursuant to the Plan Amendment. Incentive stock options offer tax benefits that
can make them more valuable than non-statutory stock options to many of our
employees, at no incremental cost to our company.
AS A RESULT, THE BOARD BELIEVES THAT APPROVAL OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT BY THE
STOCKHOLDERS IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF OUR COMPANY AND OUR STOCKHOLDERS AND
THEREFORE RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL.
An affirmative vote of a majority of the common stock voting on the matter,
in person or by proxy, is necessary to approve the Plan Amendment. Abstentions
effectively count as votes against approval of the plan. Brokers have
discretionary voting power with respect to this proposal.
RATIONALE FOR PLAN AMENDMENT
The 1996 plan is intended to advance the interests of our stockholders by
improving our ability to attract and retain qualified individuals who are in a
position to contribute to our management and growth and to provide additional
incentive for such individuals to contribute to our future success. Immediately
prior to the board's approval of the Plan Amendment, a total of
4,321,852 shares of common stock remained available for grant under the 1996
plan.
The board determined that it was necessary to have the ability to grant
additional options in order to meet our goals of retaining key employees and
attracting the best new employees by providing competitive compensation. We
hired over 700 new employees during 2000, to whom we granted options to acquire
a total of 4,866,643 shares of common stock. Due to the volatility of the stock
market during the past year, the exercise prices of all of these options are
above recent market prices of our common stock. The market price of our common
stock on the Nasdaq National Market at the close of business on April 12, 2001
was $5.59 per share. The table below presents the numbers of options granted
during 2000 at various levels of exercise prices:
NUMBER OF SHARES
SUBJECT TO
EXERCISE PRICE OPTIONS GRANTED
-------------- ----------------
$27.00 - $ 39.99 147,193
40.00 - 49.99 359,350
50.00 - 59.99 1,622,800
60.00 - 69.99 452,900
70.00 - 79.99 655,800
80.00 - 89.99 1,011,800
90.00 - 99.99 161,400
101.00 - 119.99 49,600
120.00 or more 405,800
---------
Total 4,866,643
=========
16
Since these options have exercise prices significantly greater than recent
market prices of our common stock, they have a limited ability to motivate and
help retain the employees to whom they were issued. Moreover, applicable
accounting principles make it highly undesirable for us either to lower the
exercise prices of these options or to exchange the outstanding options for new
options having lower exercise prices.
In spite of the unpredictability of the stock market, employees in the
technology sector continue to expect and require stock options as part of their
total compensation packages. Our board therefore believes that it will be
necessary to issue additional options to existing employees in the near future,
in order to encourage their continued employment with our company and to serve
as meaningful compensatory motivation. In addition, based on our projected
hiring for the next two years, the directors believe that additional shares will
be required under the 1996 plan in order to allow us to attract qualified new
employees in accordance with our business plans.
SUMMARY OF 1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN
The following summary is qualified in all respects by reference to the full
text of the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan. You can obtain a copy
of the 1996 plan by writing to Jeet Singh, our Secretary, at our address as set
forth in the Notice appearing before this proxy statement.
The 1996 plan was adopted by our board of directors in April 1996 and
approved by our stockholders in May 1996. On March 26, 2001 the board voted to
amend and restate the 1996 plan in order to, among other things, permit grants
to be evidenced electronically, conform the plan to changes in the law since its
adoption, permit tax withholding on exercises when required by law, and permit
the addition of a second director to the Employee Stock Option Committee, who
may act independently in the absence of the other director.
The 1996 plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options intended to
qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and non-statutory stock
options.
Our officers, employees, directors, consultants and advisors are eligible to
receive awards under the 1996 plan. Under present law, however, incentive stock
options may only be granted to employees. No employee may receive any award for
more than 500,000 shares in any calendar year.
Optionees receive the right to purchase a specified number of shares of
common stock at a specified option price and subject to such other terms and
conditions as are specified in connection with the option grant. We may grant
options at an exercise price less than, equal to or greater than the fair market
value of our common stock on the date of grant. Under present law, incentive
stock options and options intended to qualify as performance-based compensation
under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code may not be granted at an
exercise price less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date
of grant or less than 110% of the fair market value in the case of incentive
stock options granted to optionees holding more than 10% of the voting power of
the company. The 1996 plan permits our board of directors to determine how
optionees may pay the exercise price of their options, including by cash, check
or in connection with a "cashless exercise" by surrender to us of shares of
common stock, by delivery to us of a promissory note, or by any other means that
the board determines is consistent with the 1996 plan and applicable rules and
regulations.
17
As of March 26, 2001, approximately 1,165 persons were eligible to receive
awards under the 1996 plan, including six executive officers and five
non-employee directors. The granting of options under the 1996 plan is
discretionary and we cannot now determine the number or type of options to be
granted in the future to any particular person or group.
Our board of directors administers the 1996 plan and has the authority to
adopt, amend and repeal the administrative rules, guidelines and practices
relating to the 1996 plan and to interpret its provisions. The board may
delegate authority under the 1996 plan to one or more committees of the board of
directors. Our board of directors has authorized the Compensation Committee to
administer the 1996 plan, including the granting of options to our executive
officers. In addition, the board has authorized an Employee Stock Option
Committee to grant options under the 1996 plan for up to 300,000 shares in any
quarter. Such options may not cover more than 10,000 shares per employee per
year. Subject to any applicable limitations contained in the 1996 plan, our
board of directors, this committee and any other committee to whom our board of
directors delegates authority, may select the recipients of awards and determine
the number of shares of common stock covered by options, the dates upon which
such options become exercisable, the exercise price of options and the duration
of options.
In the event of a merger, liquidation or other acquisition event, our board
of directors is authorized to take one or more of the following actions:
- provide that outstanding options be assumed or substituted for by the
acquirer;
- provide that all unexercised options terminate immediately prior to the
event unless exercised within a time period specified in written notice to
the option holder;
- in the event of a merger in which holders of common stock would receive a
cash payment for each share surrendered, provide for a cash payment to
each option holder equal to the per share amount by which the amount paid
to common stock holders exceeds the option's exercise price, multiplied by
the total number of shares underlying the option; or
- provide that any or all outstanding options become fully exercisable
immediately prior to the event.
No award may be granted under the 1996 plan after April 2006, but the
vesting and effectiveness of awards previously granted may extend beyond that
date. Our board of directors may at any time amend the 1996 plan, except that no
award granted after an amendment of the 1996 plan and for which stockholder
approval is required under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code shall become
exercisable, realizable or vested to the extent such amendment was required to
grant such award, unless and until such amendment is approved by our
stockholders.
See Appendix B to this proxy statement for a discussion of the U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the 1996 plan.
PROPOSAL THREE: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS OF BY-LAWS
On March 26, 2001, the board of directors voted to approve a number of
changes to our by-laws in order to authorize the use of electronic or remote
communications, including e-mail, for many
18
corporate purposes. These purposes include attendance at meetings, establishment
of a quorum, voting by stockholders and written consents of directors.
See Appendix C to this proxy statement for the text of the amendments.
The affirmative vote of the holders of 75% of our issued and outstanding
shares of common stock is required to approve the amendments to our by-laws.
Abstentions will effectively count as votes against approval of the amendments.
Brokers have discretionary voting power with respect to this proposal.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENTS
TO OUR BY-LAWS.
PROPOSAL FOUR: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The board of directors, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, has
selected Arthur Andersen LLP to serve as our independent accountants for the
year ending December 31, 2001. Arthur Andersen has served as our independent
accountants since 1996. Although stockholder ratification of the selection of
Arthur Andersen is not required by law, the board of directors believes that it
is desirable to give stockholders the opportunity to ratify this selection. If
this proposal is not approved at the meeting, the board will reconsider the
selection of Arthur Andersen.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented by
proxy and voting at the meeting is required to ratify the selection of Arthur
Andersen as our independent accountants for the year ending December 31, 2001.
Abstentions are effectively counted as votes against this proposal. Brokers have
discretionary voting power with respect to this proposal.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF ARTHUR
ANDERSEN LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 2001.
AUDITORS' FEES AND OTHER MATTERS
AUDIT FEES
Arthur Andersen billed us an aggregate of $371,000 in fees for professional
services rendered in connection with the audit of our financial statements for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and the reviews of the financial
statements included in each of our three quarterly reports on Form 10-Q prepared
during fiscal year 2000.
ALL OTHER FEES
Arthur Andersen billed us an aggregate of $920,000 in fees for other
services rendered to us and our affiliates for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2000. These fees consisted of:
- $404,000 for tax compliance and advisory services, including state and
local tax compliance, transfer pricing analysis and sales tax compliance;
- $451,000 for services related to a review of company-wide business
applications and processes, including financial software consulting and
implementation; and
- $65,000 for services in connection with a proposed public offering.
19
LEASED EMPLOYEES
In connection with its engagement to audit our financial statements for the
most recent fiscal year, Arthur Andersen has informed us that no work was
performed by persons other than their full-time, permanent employees.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION FEES
Arthur Andersen did not bill us for any professional services rendered to us
or our affiliates for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 in connection with
financial information systems design or implementation, the operation of our
information system, or the management of our local area network.
AVAILABILITY OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
Representatives of Arthur Andersen will be present at the meeting to answer
appropriate questions. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if
they desire to do so.
OTHER MATTERS
The board of directors is not aware of any matters that are expected to come
before the meeting other than those referred to in this proxy statement. If any
other matter should properly come before the meeting, the persons named in the
accompanying proxy card intend to vote the proxies in accordance with their best
judgment.
The chairperson of the meeting may refuse to allow the transaction of any
business not presented beforehand, or to acknowledge the nomination of any
person not made, in compliance with the above procedures.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2002 ANNUAL MEETING
Stockholder proposals intended to be presented at our 2002 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders must have been received by us at our principal executive offices by
December 14, 2001 for inclusion in the proxy statement and proxy card that will
relate to that meeting.
Under our by-laws, a stockholder must follow certain procedures to nominate
one or more individuals for election as a director or to introduce an item of
business at an annual meeting of stockholders. These procedures provide that any
nomination or proposed item of business must be submitted in writing to our
Secretary at 25 First Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02141. The nomination or
proposed item of business must be received not less than sixty days nor more
than ninety days prior to the 2002 Annual Meeting and must include the name and
address of the stockholder proposing such nomination or item of business and the
number of shares of common stock owned by such stockholder.
A nomination must contain the following information about the nominee:
- name, age, business and, if known, residence address;
- principal occupation or employment;
20
- the number of shares of our common stock, if any, held by the nominee; and
- the information that would be required under SEC rules in a proxy
statement soliciting proxies for the election of such nominee as a
director.
Notice of a proposed item of business must include:
- a brief description of the substance of, and the reasons for, conducting
such business at the annual meeting; and
- any material interest of the stockholder in such business.
We have not yet set a date for our 2002 meeting. If the 2002 meeting were to
be held on May 14, 2002 (the anniversary of the 2001 meeting), the deadline for
delivery of a stockholder proposal or nomination would be March 15, 2002.
LEGAL MATTERS
On October 31, 2000, Aron Rosenberg, one of our stockholders, filed a
lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware,
Rosenberg V. Tudor Investment Corp., Tudor Private Equity Fund L.P., The Raptor
Global Fund L.P., The Raptor Global Fund Ltd., Tudor Global Trading LLC and Art
Technology Group, Inc., Civil Action No. 00-925. Mr. Rosenberg's complaint
alleges that the Tudor and Raptor entities violated Section 16(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with their sales of our common
stock after our initial public offering on July 20, 1999. Those entities
received shares of our common stock immediately before our closing of our
initial public offering, upon the conversion of Series D preferred stock that
they had acquired more than six months before our initial public offering. The
complaint alleges that those entities should be deemed to have purchased shares
of our common stock shortly before the closing of our initial public offering,
as the result of changes effected through a charter amendment relating to the
preferred stock. The complaint also alleges that the entities obtained profits
of more than $70 million from sales of our common stock within six months after
the date on which such purchase should be deemed to have occurred and that those
profits should be paid to us in accordance with Section 16(b). Although we are a
nominal defendant in the suit, Mr. Rosenberg is not seeking any damages from us.
We cannot assure you that we will receive any payment as a result of this
lawsuit.
In February 2001, we received a letter from attorneys representing Open
Market, Inc., an Internet software company, asserting that our software
infringed certain of Open Market's patents. Although eight patent descriptions
were attached as exhibits, the letter did not describe which of the patents we
allegedly infringed, nor did it describe the manner in which our software
infringed those patents. We have engaged patent counsel to review the Open
Market patents and to try to ascertain the details of the claim from Open
Market's counsel. Open Market has not filed a lawsuit against us as a result of
these claims, but we cannot be certain that a lawsuit will not be filed in the
future.
21
APPENDIX A
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
MEMBERSHIP
NUMBER. The Audit Committee shall consist of at least three independent,
financially literate members of the board of directors meeting the requirements
set forth below.
INDEPENDENCE. A director is independent if he or she is not an officer or
employee of the Company or its subsidiaries, if he or she has no relationship
which, in the opinion of the Company's board of directors, would interfere with
his or her exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities
of a director, and if he or she:
- has not been an employee of the Company or any affiliate of the Company in
the current year or in any of the past three years;
- has no immediate family member who has been employed by the Company or an
affiliate of the Company in any of the past three years (an immediate
family member includes a person's spouse, parents, children, siblings,
mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law,
daughter-in-law, and anyone who resides in a person's home);
- is not employed as an executive of an entity other than the Company having
a compensation committee which includes any of the Company's executives;
- did not within the last fiscal year receive from the Company or any
affiliate of the Company compensation--other than benefits under at tax
qualified retirement plan, compensation for director service or
nondiscretionary compensation--greater than $60,000; and
- has not in any of the past three years been a partner in, or controlling
shareholder or executive of, a for profit business organization to which
the Company made or from which the Company received payment (other than
payment arising solely from investments in the Company's securities) that
exceeds the greater of: (i) $200,000; or (ii) more than 5% of the
Company's or business organization's consolidated gross revenues.
Under exceptional and limited circumstances, one director who has a
relationship making him or her not independent, and who is not a Company
employee or an immediate family member of a Company employee, may serve on the
Audit Committee if the board of directors determines that the director's
membership on the Audit Committee is required by the best interests of the
Company and its shareholders, and discloses in the next annual proxy statement
after such determination the nature of the relationship and the reasons for the
determination.
FINANCIAL LITERACY. Each member of the Audit Committee must be able to read
and understand fundamental financial statements, including the Company's balance
sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, or must become able to do so
within a reasonable time after his or her appointment to the Audit Committee. At
least one member of the Audit Committee must have past employment experience in
finance or accounting, professional certification in accounting, or other
comparable experience or background which result in the member having financial
sophistication (such as being or having been a chief executive officer, chief
financial officer or other senior officer with financial oversight
responsibilities).
A-1
CHAIRMAN. Unless a Chairman is elected by the board of directors, the Audit
Committee shall elect a Chairman by majority vote.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee shall assist the board of directors in fulfilling their
responsibilities to shareholders concerning the Company's accounting and
reporting practices, and shall facilitate open communication between the Audit
Committee, board of directors, outside auditors, and management. The Audit
Committee shall discharge its responsibilities, and shall assess the information
provided by the Company's management and the outside auditor, in accordance with
its business judgment. The responsibilities set forth herein do not reflect or
create any duty or obligation of the Audit Committee to plan, conduct, oversee
or determine the appropriate scope of any audit, or to determine that the
Company's financial statements are complete, accurate, fairly presented, or in
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or applicable law. In
exercising its business judgment, the Audit Committee shall rely on the
information and advice provided by the Company's management and/or its outside
auditor.
The Audit Committee shall review and reassess the adequacy of this charter
at least annually.
The outside auditor shall be accountable to the Audit Committee and the
board of directors, which together shall have the ultimate authority and
responsibility to nominate the outside auditor to be proposed for shareholder
approval in any proxy statement, and to select, evaluate, and (where
appropriate) replace the outside auditor.
The Audit Committee shall ensure that they receive from the outside auditor
the written disclosures and letter from the outside auditor required by
Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1.
The Audit Committee shall discuss with the outside auditor its independence,
and shall actively engage in a dialogue with the outside auditor regarding any
disclosed relationships or services that might impact the objectivity and
independence of the auditor. The Audit Committee shall take, or recommend that
the full board of directors take, appropriate action to oversee the independence
of the outside auditor.
The Audit Committee shall review and discuss with the Company's management
the Company's audited financial statements.
The Audit Committee shall discuss with the outside auditor the matters about
which Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 requires discussion.
Based upon its discharge of its responsibilities pursuant to this Charter
and any other information, discussion or communication that the Audit Committee
in its business judgment deems relevant, the Audit Committee shall consider
whether they will recommend to the board of directors that the Company's audited
financial statements be included in the Company's annual reports on Forms 10-K.
The Audit Committee shall prepare for inclusion where necessary in a proxy
or information statement of the Company relating to an annual meeting of
security holders at which directors are to be elected (or special meeting or
written consents in lieu of such meeting), the report described in Item 306 of
Regulation S-K.
A-2
The Audit Committee shall annually inform the outside auditor, the Chief
Financial Officer, the Controller, and the most senior other person, if any,
responsible for the internal audit activities, that they should promptly contact
the Audit Committee or its Chairman about any significant issue or disagreement
concerning the Company's accounting practices or financial statements that is
not resolved to their satisfaction. Where such communications are made to the
Chairman, he or she shall confer with the outside auditor concerning any such
communications, and shall notify the other members of the Audit Committee of any
communications which the outside auditor or the Chairman in the exercise of his
or her business judgment believes should be considered by the Audit Committee
prior to its next scheduled meeting.
The Audit Committee shall direct the outside auditor to use its best efforts
to perform all reviews of interim financial information prior to disclosure by
the Company of such information, and to discuss promptly with the Chairman of
the Audit Committee and the Chief Financial Officer any matters identified in
connection with the auditor's review of interim financial information which are
required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61. The Chairman
of the Audit Committee shall discuss any such matters with the outside auditor,
and shall notify the other members of the Audit Committee of any discussions
which the outside auditor or the Chairman in the exercise of his or her business
judgment believes should be considered by the Audit Committee prior to
disclosure or filing of the interim financial information, or the Audit
Committee's next scheduled meeting.
A-3
APPENDIX B
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED 1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN
The following is a summary of the United States federal income tax
consequences that generally will arise with respect to options granted under our
Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan and with respect to the sale of
common stock acquired under the 1996 plan. It does not address the tax
consequences that may arise with respect to any gift or disposition other than
by sale of common stock acquired under the 1996 plan. For precise advice as to
any specific transaction or set of circumstances, any participant in the 1996
plan, referred to as a Participant, should consult with his or her own tax
advisors. Any participants should also consult with his or her own tax advisor
regarding the application of any state, local, and foreign taxes and any federal
gift, estate, and inheritance taxes. For purposes of the following description,
"we," "our" and "us" refer to ATG and its subsidiaries, unless the context
requires otherwise.
INCENTIVE STOCK OPTIONS
In general, a Participant will not recognize taxable income upon the grant
or exercise of an incentive stock option. Instead, a Participant will recognize
taxable income with respect to an incentive stock option only upon the sale of
common stock, referred to as ISO Stock, acquired through the exercise of the
incentive stock option. Nevertheless, in the case of a Participant who has not
been employed by us at all times commencing on the date on which a particular
incentive stock option was granted and ending on the date that is three months
before the date on which the option is exercised, the option generally will be
treated as though it were a non-statutory stock option and taxed as described
below under "Non-Statutory Stock Options." Similarly, incentive stock options
will be treated as non-statutory stock options for purposes of the alternative
minimum tax. While a Participant will pay alternative minimum tax only to the
extent of the excess of that tax over the Participant's regular tax, the
treatment of an option as a non-statutory stock option for purposes of the
alternative minimum tax could create such an excess.
Generally, the tax consequences of selling ISO Stock will vary with the
length of time that the Participant has owned the ISO Stock at the time it is
sold. If the Participant sells ISO Stock after having owned it for more than two
years from the grant date and one year from the exercise date, then the
Participant will recognize long-term capital gain in an amount equal to the
excess of the sale price of the ISO Stock over the exercise price.
If the Participant sells ISO Stock prior to having owned it for more than
two years from the grant date and one year from the exercise date, known as a
Disqualifying Disposition", then the Participant generally will recognize
ordinary compensation income in an amount equal to the lesser of:
(1) the excess of the fair market value of the ISO Stock on the Exercise
Date over the exercise price; and
(2) the excess of the sale price of the ISO Stock over the exercise price.
A Participant making a Disqualifying Disposition will also recognize capital
gain in an amount equal to the excess of the sale price of the ISO Stock over
the fair market value of the ISO Stock on the exercise date. This capital gain
will be a long-term capital gain if the Participant has held the ISO
B-1
Stock for more than one year prior to the date of the sale and will be a
short-term capital gain if the Participant has held the ISO Stock for a shorter
period.
If a Participant sells ISO Stock for less than the exercise price, then the
Participant will recognize capital loss equal to the excess of the exercise
price over the sale price of the ISO Stock. This capital loss will be a
long-term capital loss if the Participant has held the ISO Stock for more than
one year prior to the date of the sale and will be a short-term capital loss if
the Participant has held the ISO Stock for a shorter period.
NON-STATUTORY STOCK OPTIONS
As in the case of an incentive stock option, a Participant will not
recognize taxable income upon the grant of a non-statutory stock option.
However, a Participant generally will recognize ordinary compensation income
upon the exercise of a non-statutory stock option in an amount equal to the
excess of the fair market value of the common stock, referred to as NSO Stock,
acquired through the exercise of the non-statutory stock option on the exercise
date over the exercise price.
With respect to any NSO Stock, a Participant will have a tax basis equal to
the exercise price plus any income recognized upon the exercise of the option.
Upon selling NSO Stock, a Participant generally will recognize capital gain or
loss in an amount equal to the excess of the sale price of the NSO Stock over
the Participant's tax basis in the NSO Stock. This capital gain or loss will be
a long-term capital gain or loss if the Participant has held the NSO Stock for
more than one year prior to the date of the sale and will be a short-term
capital gain or loss if the Participant has held the NSO Stock for a shorter
period.
DELIVERY OF COMMON STOCK UPON EXERCISE OF STOCK OPTIONS
Under certain circumstances, the 1996 plan permits a Participant to exercise
an option by delivering to us common stock having a fair market value equal in
amount to the exercise price. The use of this method of exercise generally will
not alter the tax consequences described above, and it may enable a Participant
to dispose of appreciated common stock without immediately recognizing capital
gain on the disposition. The Participant's tax basis in any shares of common
stock delivered to us to exercise an option generally will be carried over to an
equal number of shares of common stock acquired upon exercising the option.
Nevertheless, any Participant should consider that the delivery to us of ISO
Stock or common stock acquired pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan will
constitute a Disqualifying Disposition, having all of the adverse tax
consequences described above, if the holding-period requirements described above
are not satisfied with respect to that stock.
MAXIMUM INCOME TAX RATES ON CAPITAL GAIN AND ORDINARY INCOME
Long-term capital gain will be taxable at a maximum rate of 20% or, if
certain additional requirements are satisfied, including the satisfaction of a
five-year holding period, a maximum rate of 18%. Short-term capital gain and
ordinary income will be taxable at a maximum rate of 39.6%. Phase outs of
personal exemptions and reductions of allowable itemized deductions at higher
levels of income may result in slightly higher marginal tax rates. Except in the
case of a Disqualifying Disposition of ISO Stock, ordinary compensation income
will also be subject to a Medicare tax and, under certain circumstances, a
social security tax.
B-2
OUR TAX CONSEQUENCES
The grant of an option under the 1996 plan will have no tax consequences to
us. Moreover, in general, neither the exercise of an incentive stock option
acquired under the 1996 plan nor the sale of any common stock acquired under the
1996 plan will have any tax consequences to us. We generally will be entitled to
a business-expense deduction, however, with respect to any ordinary compensation
income recognized by a Participant under the 1996 plan. Any such deduction will
be subject to the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
WITHHOLDING
While a Participant's Disqualifying Disposition of ISO Stock will result in
the recognition of ordinary compensation income, we will have no withholding
obligation with respect to that income. Nevertheless, we will have a withholding
obligation with respect to ordinary compensation income recognized upon the
exercise of a Non-Statutory Stock option by a Participant who has been employed
by us. We will require any such Participant to make arrangements to satisfy this
withholding obligation.
B-3
APPENDIX C
AMENDMENTS TO THE BY-LAWS
SECTION 1.6 OF THE BY-LAWS SHALL BE DELETED IN ITS ENTIRETY AND REPLACED WITH
THE FOLLOWING:
1.6 Quorum. Except as otherwise provided by law, the Certificate of
Incorporation or these By-laws, the holders of a majority of the shares of the
capital stock of the corporation issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at
the meeting, present in person, present by means of remote communication in a
manner, if any, authorized by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion, or
represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
A quorum, once established at a meeting, shall not be broken by the withdrawal
of enough votes to leave less than a quorum.
SECTION 1.8 OF THE BY-LAWS SHALL BE DELETED IN ITS ENTIRETY AND REPLACED WITH
THE FOLLOWING:
1.8 Voting and Proxies. Each stockholder shall have one vote for each
share of stock entitled to vote held of record by such stockholder and a
proportionate vote for each fractional share so held, unless otherwise provided
by law or the Certificate of Incorporation. Each stockholder of record entitled
to vote at a meeting of stockholders may vote in person or may authorize another
person or persons to vote for such stockholder by a proxy executed or
transmitted in a manner permitted by the General Corporation Law of Delaware by
the stockholder or such stockholder's authorized agent and delivered (including
by electronic transmission) to the Secretary of the corporation. No such proxy
shall be voted upon after three years from the date of its execution, unless the
proxy expressly provides for a longer period.
SECTION 1.13 OF THE BY-LAWS SHALL BE DELETED IN ITS ENTIRETY AND REPLACED WITH
THE FOLLOWING:
1.13 Conduct of Meetings.
(a) Chairman of Meeting. Meetings of stockholders shall be presided over
by the Chairman of the Board, if any, or in the Chairman's absence by the Vice
Chairman of the Board, if any, or in the Vice Chairman's absence by the Chief
Executive Officer, or in the Chief Executive Officer's absence by the President
or a Vice President, or in the absence of all of the foregoing persons by a
chairman designated by the Board of Directors, or in the absence of such
designation by a chairman chosen by vote of the stockholders at the meeting. The
Secretary shall act as secretary of the meeting, but in the Secretary's absence
the chairman of the meeting may appoint any person to act as secretary of the
meeting.
(b) Rules, Regulations and Procedures. The Board of Directors of the
corporation may adopt by resolution such rules, regulations and procedures for
the conduct of any meeting of stockholders of the corporation as it shall deem
appropriate including, without limitation, such guidelines and procedures as it
may deem appropriate regarding the participation by means of remote
communication of stockholders and proxyholders not physically present at a
meeting. Except to the extent inconsistent with such rules, regulations and
procedures as adopted by the Board of Directors, the chairman of any meeting of
stockholders shall have the right and authority to prescribe such rules,
regulations and procedures and to do all such acts as, in the judgment of such
chairman, are appropriate for the proper conduct of the meeting. Such rules,
regulations or procedures, whether adopted by the Board of
C-1
Directors or prescribed by the chairman of the meeting, may include, without
limitation, the following: (i) the establishment of an agenda or order of
business for the meeting; (ii) rules and procedures for maintaining order at the
meeting and the safety of those present; (iii) limitations on attendance at or
participation in the meeting to stockholders of record of the corporation, their
duly authorized and constituted proxies or such other persons as shall be
determined; (iv) restrictions on entry to the meeting after the time fixed for
the commencement thereof; and (v) limitations on the time allotted to questions
or comments by participants. Unless and to the extent determined by the Board of
Directors or the chairman of the meeting, meetings of stockholders shall not be
required to be held in accordance with the rules of parliamentary procedure.
(c) Closing of Polls. The chairman of the meeting shall announce at the
meeting when the polls for each matter to be voted upon at the meeting will be
opened and closed. If no announcement is made, the polls shall be deemed to have
opened when the meeting is convened and closed upon the final adjournment of the
meeting. After the polls close, no ballots, proxies or votes or any revocations
or changes thereto may be accepted.
(d) Inspectors of Election. In advance of any meeting of stockholders, the
Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board or the Chief Executive Officer
shall appoint one or more inspectors or election to act at the meeting and make
a written report thereof. One or more other persons may be designated as
alternate inspectors to replace any inspector who fails to act. If no inspector
or alternate is present, ready and willing to act at a meeting of stockholders,
the chairman of the meeting shall appoint one or more inspectors to act at the
meeting. Unless otherwise required by law, inspectors may be officers, employees
or agents of the corporation. Each inspector, before entering upon the discharge
of such inspector's duties, shall take and sign an oath faithfully to execute
the duties of inspector with strict impartiality and according to the best of
such inspector's ability. The inspector shall have the duties prescribed by law
and shall take charge of the polls and, when the vote in completed, shall make a
certificate of the result of the vote taken and of such other facts as may be
required by law.
SECTION 2.10 OF THE BY-LAWS SHALL BE DELETED IN ITS ENTIRETY AND REPLACED WITH
THE FOLLOWING:
2.10 Resignation. Any director may resign by delivering a resignation in
writing or by electronic transmission to the corporation at its principal office
or to the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or the Secretary.
Such resignation shall be effective upon receipt unless it is specified to be
effective at some later time or upon the happening of some later event.
SECTION 2.11 OF THE BY-LAWS SHALL BE DELETED IN ITS ENTIRETY AND REPLACED WITH
THE FOLLOWING:
2.11 Meetings by Conference Communications Equipment. Directors may
participate in meetings of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof by
means of conference telephone or other communications equipment by means of
which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each other, and
participation by such means shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.
SECTION 2.14 OF THE BY-LAWS SHALL BE DELETED IN ITS ENTIRETY AND REPLACED WITH
THE FOLLOWING:
2.14 Action by Written Consent. Any action required or permitted to be
taken at any meeting of the Board of Directors or of any committee thereof may
be taken without a meeting, if all members of the Board or committee, as the
case may be, consent to the action in writing or by electronic
C-2
transmission, and the written consents and electronic transmissions are filed
with the minutes of proceedings of the Board or committee.
SECTION 5.3 OF THE BY-LAWS SHALL BE DELETED IN ITS ENTIRETY AND REPLACED WITH
THE FOLLOWING:
5.3 Waiver of Notice. Whenever notice is required to be given by law, by
the Certificate of Incorporation or by these By-laws, a written waiver signed by
the person entitled to notice, or a waiver by electronic transmission by the
person entitled to notice, whether before, at or after the time stated in such
notice, shall be deemed equivalent to notice. Attendance of a person at a
meeting shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting, except when the
person attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting at the beginning
of the meeting, to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not
lawfully called or convened.
C-3
PROXY
ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
The Board of Directors of Art Technology Group, Inc. is Soliciting this Proxy
The undersigned owns shares of common stock of Art Technology Group, Inc.(the
"Company"). The Company's 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on
Monday, May 14, 2001, beginning at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the offices of
Hale and Dorr LLP, 60 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. The undersigned
appoints each of Ann C. Brady, Linda Handman, and Mark L. Johnson, acting
singly, with the power of substitution to each, as attorney, agent and proxy to
vote all shares of common stock that the undersigned is entitled to vote, at the
meeting and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
The individuals named above will vote these shares as directed by the
undersigned on this proxy. IF NO PROPER VOTING INSTRUCTIONS ARE GIVEN, THE
INDIVIDUALS NAMED ABOVE WILL VOTE THE SHARES OF THE UNDERSIGNED FOR THE ELECTION
OF THE NOMINEE LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PROXY AS A DIRECTOR OF THE
COMPANY AND FOR PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4.
If any other matters are properly presented for consideration at the meeting,
the individuals named above will have the discretion to vote these shares on
those matters.
MARK HERE FOR ADDRESS CHANGE AND NOTE BELOW | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEE REVERSE SIDE (Please sign and date on reverse side) SEE REVERSE SIDE
DETACH HERE
|X| Please mark votes as in this example.
PROPOSAL 1. To elect Scott A. Jones and Thomas N. Matlack as Class II
directors of the Company to serve until the 2004 Annual
Meeting or until their successors are elected and qualified:
FOR WITHHELD
ALL NOMINEES FROM ALL NOMINEES
| | | |
| |
--------------------------------------
FOR ALL NOMINESS EXCEPT AS NOTED ABOVE
PROPOSAL 2. To approve the amendment of the Amended and Restated 1996
Stock Option Plan to increase the number of shares of common
stock available thereunder to 25,600,000.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
| | | | | |
PROPOSAL 3. To approve the amendments of the By-laws.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
| | | | | |
PROPOSAL 4. To ratify the selection of Arthur Andersen LLP as the
independent accountants of the Company for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2001.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
| | | | | |
Mark here if you plan to attend the meeting: | |
Please sign exactly as your name is printed on this proxy. When signing as
attorney-in-fact, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian or custodian, or in
any other representative capacity, please write title.
Owner: ______________________________________________ Date: _____________, 2001
Co-Owner: ___________________________________________ Date: _____________, 2001