def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
GRANITE
CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ
|
|
No fee required. |
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule a-II (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule a-II(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRANITE
CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
585 West Beach Street
Watsonville, California 95076
Notice of Annual Meeting of
Shareholders
April 3, 2009
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
Friday, May 15, 2009
|
Time:
|
|
10:30 a.m., Pacific Daylight Time
|
Place:
|
|
Embassy Suites
1441 Canyon Del Rey
Seaside, California 93955
|
Purposes of the
Meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
To elect two (2) directors for the ensuing three-year term;
|
|
|
|
To act upon a proposal to amend the Granite Construction
Incorporated Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
To ratify the appointment by the Audit/Compliance Committee of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Granites independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2009; and
|
|
|
|
To consider any other matters properly brought before the
meeting.
|
Who May Attend
the Meeting?
Only shareholders, persons holding proxies from shareholders and
invited representatives of the media and financial community may
attend the meeting.
What to
Bring:
If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials, please bring that Notice with you. If your shares are
held in the name of a broker, trust, bank, or other nominee, you
will need to bring a proxy or letter from that broker, trust
bank, or nominee that confirms you are the beneficial owner of
those shares.
Record
Date:
March 20, 2009 is the record date for the meeting. This
means that if you own Granite stock at the close of business on
that date, you are entitled to receive notice of the meeting and
vote at the meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the
meeting.
Annual
Report:
We have included a copy of the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year that ended December 31, 2008 with the
proxy solicitation materials on Granites website. The
annual report is not part of the proxy solicitation materials.
Shareholder
List:
For ten days prior to the meeting, a complete list of
shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available
for examination by any shareholder for any purpose relative to
the meeting during regular business hours at Granites
headquarters located at 585 West Beach Street, Watsonville,
CA 95076. The shareholder list will also be available at the
annual meeting.
Information about
the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy:
This year, except for persons who have shares in Granites
Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan (401(k)
Participants), instead of mailing a printed copy of our
proxy materials, including our Annual Report, to each
shareholder of record, we will provide access to these materials
in a fast and efficient manner via the internet. This reduces
the amount of paper necessary to produce these materials, as
well as the costs associated with mailing these materials to all
shareholders. Accordingly, on April 3, 2009, we will begin
mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to
those shareholders of record as of March 20, 2009, other
than 401(k) Participants, and we will post our proxy materials
on the website referenced in the notice
(http://www.cfpproxy.com/5195).
On or about April 13, 2009 we will mail a second notice to
shareholders, other than 401(k) Participants, which will also
include a proxy card. All shareholders may choose to access our
proxy materials on the website or may request to receive a
printed set of our proxy materials. In addition, the notices and
website provide information regarding how you may request to
receive proxy materials in printed form by mail on an ongoing
basis.
Proxy
Voting:
Your vote is important. Please vote your proxy promptly so your
shares can be represented at the annual meeting even if you plan
to attend the meeting. Shareholders, with the exception of
401(k) Participants, can vote by internet, telephone or by using
the proxy card that is enclosed with the second notice.
Granites 401(k) Participants, as in the past, will receive
a package in the mail that includes all proxy materials and the
proxy card. You may revoke your proxy without affecting your
right to vote in person if you decide to attend the meeting.
Your proxy card has specific instructions on how to vote.
To get directions to the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
call our Investor Relations Department at 831.761.4714.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Michael Futch
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Proxy
Statement
As more fully described in the notice, Granite Construction
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, on behalf of its Board of
Directors, has made these materials available to you on the
internet or has mailed you printed versions of these materials
in connection with Granites 2009 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, which will take place on May 15, 2009. The
notice was mailed to Granite shareholders beginning
April 3, 2009, and our proxy materials were posted on the
website referenced in the notice on April 3, 2009. Granite,
on behalf of its Board of Directors, is soliciting your proxy to
vote your shares at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or
any subsequent adjournment or postponement. We solicit proxies
to give all shareholders of record an opportunity to vote on
matters listed in the accompanying notice
and/or any
other matters that may be presented at the annual meeting. In
this proxy statement you will find information on these matters,
which is provided to assist you in voting your shares.
Granite Construction Incorporated was incorporated in Delaware
in January 1990 as the holding company for Granite Construction
Company, which was incorporated in California in 1922. All dates
in this proxy statement referring to service with Granite also
include periods of service with Granite Construction Company.
Voting
Information
Who Pays for this
Solicitation?
Granite pays for the cost of this proxy solicitation. We will
request banks and brokers, and other custodians, nominees and
fiduciaries to solicit their customers who own our stock. We
will reimburse their reasonable, out-of-pocket expenses for
doing this. Our directors, officers and employees may also
solicit proxies by mail, telephone, personal contact, telegraph,
or through online methods without additional compensation.
Who Can
Vote?
You will have received notice of the annual meeting and can vote
if you were a shareholder of record of Granites common
stock as of the close of business on March 20, 2009. Each
share of Granite stock you own is entitled to one vote. You may
vote all shares owned by you as of the record date, including
shares held directly in your name as the shareholder of record,
and shares held for you as the beneficial owner through a
broker, trustee or other nominee such as a bank. As of the close
of business on March 20, 2009, there were
38,677,755 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
Voting
Procedures
This year, shareholders, with the exception of 401(k)
Participants, have the option to vote by proxy three ways:
¨ By
internet: You can vote by internet following the
instructions in the second notice or by accessing the internet
at https://www.proxyvotenow.com/gva and following the
instructions at that website.
1
¨ By
telephone: In the United States and Canada you can vote
by telephone using a touch-tone phone by following the
instructions in the second notice or by calling 1.888.216.1289
(toll free) and following the instructions; or
¨ By
mail: You will receive a notice detailing your options
(to be mailed on or about April 3, 2009), then ten days
later, a second notice that includes a proxy card will be
mailed. Follow the instructions on the card.
Granites 401(k) Participants can only vote by mail this
year. If you are a 401(k) Participant, you will have received a
full set of proxy materials in the mail (mailed on or about
April 3, 2009) including the proxy statement, the
annual report and a proxy card.
Please refer to the notice or the information your bank, broker
or other holder of record provided you for more information on
the above options. If you have the option to authorize a proxy
to vote your shares over the internet or by telephone, you
should not return a proxy card by mail (unless you are revoking
your previous proxy). If you vote by proxy card, your shares
will be voted at the annual meeting in the manner you indicate
on your proxy card. If you sign your proxy card but do not
specify how you want your shares to be voted, they will be voted
as the Board of Directors recommends by the persons named on
your proxy card. This proxy statement contains a description of
each item that you are to vote on along with our Boards
recommendations. Below is a summary of our Boards
recommendations:
|
|
|
|
¨
|
For election of both nominated directors;
|
|
|
¨
|
For the proposal to amend the Granite Construction
Incorporated Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive
Plan; and
|
|
|
¨
|
For ratification of the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Granites independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2009.
|
As to any other item that may be properly proposed at the annual
meeting, including a motion to adjourn the annual meeting to
another time or place, the shares will be voted in the
discretion of the persons named on your proxy card.
If there is a quorum, nominees for election to the Board who
receive a majority of the shares voted will be elected as
members of our Board of Directors for the upcoming three-year
term. This means that a majority of votes cast for
the election of a director must exceed the number of votes cast
against the directors election, excluding
abstentions. The other proposal included in this proxy statement
requires the affirmative vote of the votes cast for passage. Any
other matters properly proposed at the meeting will also be
determined by a majority of the votes cast except as otherwise
required by law or by Granites Certificate of
Incorporation or bylaws. This includes a motion to adjourn the
annual meeting to another time or place (which includes by
reason of soliciting additional proxies).
If you hold shares in a brokerage account and do not provide
your broker with voting instructions, your shares may constitute
broker non-votes. Generally, a broker non-vote
occurs when a broker submits a proxy card with respect to shares
held in a fiduciary capacity (typically referred to as being
held in street name), but declines to vote on a
particular matter because the broker does not have discretionary
voting
2
power with respect to that proposal and has not received voting
instructions from you. In tabulating the voting result for any
particular proposal, shares that constitute broker non-votes on
that proposal will not be counted in determining the number of
shares necessary for approval, except with respect to proposals
requiring the affirmative vote of the issued and outstanding
shares at the record date.
After I Return my
Proxy Card Can I Change or Revoke my Proxy?
You can revoke your proxy at any time before the annual meeting.
You may revoke your proxy by internet, by telephone or by filing
with our Secretary a written revocation or a properly signed
proxy card bearing a later date, or by attending the meeting and
voting in person if you are a shareholder of record. Your proxy
card gives specific instructions on how to vote.
Can I Vote at the
Annual Meeting instead of Voting by Proxy?
You may attend the annual meeting and vote in person instead of
voting by proxy; however, we strongly encourage you to vote by
internet, telephone or mail prior to the meeting to ensure that
your shares are voted.
What Constitutes
a Quorum?
Granites bylaws require a quorum to be present in order to
transact business at the meeting. A quorum consists of a
majority of the shares entitled to vote, either in person or
represented by proxy. In determining a quorum we count votes for
and against, abstentions and broker non-votes as present.
Who Supervises
the Voting at the Meeting?
Granites bylaws and policies also specify that prior to
the annual meeting management will appoint an independent
Inspector of Elections to supervise the voting at the meeting.
The Inspector decides all questions as to the qualification of
voters, the validity of proxy cards and the acceptance or
rejection of votes. Before assuming his or her duties, the
Inspector will take and sign an oath that he or she will
faithfully perform his or her duties both impartially and to the
best of his or her ability.
The Board of
Directors
Election of
Directors
The Board of Directors is divided into three classes. We keep
the classes as equal in number as possible, however, the number
of directors in a class depends on the total number of directors
at any given time. Each director serves for a term of three
years. The classes are arranged so that the terms of the
directors in each class expire at successive annual meetings.
This means that shareholders annually elect approximately
one-third of the members of the Board. Granite currently has
nine directors on the Board.
3
The terms of David H. Kelsey and James W. Bradford, Jr.
will expire at the 2009 annual meeting. The Board has nominated
these two individuals for new terms. If elected, each of the
nominees will serve as directors until the 2012 annual meeting
and until his successor is elected and qualified or he resigns
or until his death, removal, or other cause identified in
Granites bylaws.
Management knows of no reason why either of these nominees
should be unable or unwilling to serve. Both nominees have
accepted the nomination and agreed to serve as a director if
elected by the shareholders. However, if either nominee should
for any reason become unable or unwilling to serve between the
date of the proxy statement and the annual meeting, the Board
may designate a new nominee and the persons named as proxies
will vote for that substitute nominee. You cannot vote for more
than two nominees.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each
of the above-named nominees.
Nominees for
Director with Terms Expiring at the 2009 Annual
Meeting
|
|
|
|
|
David H.
Kelsey
Director since 2003
Mr. Kelsey has served as
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sealed Air
Corporation, an S&P 500 manufacturer of specialty packaging
for food and other protective applications, since December 2003
and served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer between
January 2002 and December 2003. Mr. Kelsey holds a B.S.E.
degree in Civil and Geological Engineering from Princeton
University and an M.B.A. degree from Harvard University Graduate
School of Business. Age 58.
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Bradford,
Jr.
Director since 2006
Mr. Bradford has served in
various capacities at Vanderbilt University, Owen School of
Management. From March 2005 to present, he has served as Dean
and Ralph Owen Professor for the Practice of Management. Between
2002 and March 2005, he served as Acting Dean, Associate Dean
Corporate Relations, Clinical Professor of Management and
Adjunct Professor. Between 1999 and September 2001, he served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of United Glass
Corporation, and from 1992 to 1999, he served as President and
Chief Executive Officer of AFG Industries. Mr. Bradford is
currently a director of Genesco, Inc. and Clarcor, Inc. He holds
a B.A. degree in History and Political Science from the
University of Florida and a J.D. degree from Vanderbilt
University. Age 62.
|
4
Continuing
Directors with Terms Expiring at the 2010 Annual
Meeting
|
|
|
|
|
William G.
Dorey
Director since 2004
Mr. Dorey has been an
employee of Granite since 1968 and has served in various
capacities, including his current positions as Chief Executive
Officer since January 2004 and President since February 2003. He
also served as Chief Operating Officer between May 1998 and
January 2004, Executive Vice President between November 1998 and
February 2003, Senior Vice President between 1990 and 1998,
Branch Division Manager from 1987 to 1998, and Vice
President and Branch Division Assistant Manager from 1983
to 1987. Mr. Dorey has been a director of Granite since
January 2004. Mr. Dorey holds a B.S. degree in Construction
Engineering from Arizona State University. Age 64.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rebecca A.
McDonald
Director since 1994
Ms. McDonald has served as
Chief Executive Officer of Laurus Energy Inc. since December
2008. She previously served as President, Gas and Power, BHP
Billiton from March 2004 to September 2007, and, from October
2001 to January 2004, she served as President of the Houston
Museum of Natural Science. Ms. McDonald holds a B.S. degree
in Education from Stephen F. Austin State University.
Age 56.
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H.
Powell
Director since 2004
Mr. Powell served as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of National Starch and
Chemical Company from 1999 until he retired in 2006. He is
currently the Chairman, Board of Trustees of State Theatre
Performing Arts Center in New Brunswick, New Jersey and serves
as a director of Arch Chemical Company, Inc., and PolyOne Inc.
Mr. Powell holds a B.A. degree in Chemistry, an M.S. in
Chemical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University and an
M.A. in Business Administration from the University of North
Dakota. Age 63.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claes G.
Bjork
Director since 2006
Mr. Bjork served as Chief
Executive Officer of Skanska AB, Sweden, one of the worlds
largest construction companies, from 1997 to 2002. He also
served as President of Skanska USA from 1984 to 1996, Vice
President from 1978 to 1984 and held various project management
and field positions within Skanska USA from 1969 to 1977. From
1998 through 2000, Mr. Bjork served as Chairman of Scancem
Cement Company. He currently serves on the board of Consolidated
Management Group, Qlik Technologies, Inc., and the Swedish
American Chamber of Commerce. He studied Civil Engineering in
Sweden. Age 63.
|
5
Continuing
Directors with Terms Expiring at the 2011 Annual
Meeting
|
|
|
|
|
David H.
Watts Director
since 1988
Mr. Watts has served as
our Chairman of the Board since May 1999. He also served as our
Chief Executive Officer from October 1987 to December 2003 and
as our President from October 1987 to January 2003. He was
formerly President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of
Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc., an industrial engineering
and construction firm. Mr. Watts currently serves as a
director of Elgin National Industries, Inc. (a private company),
the California Chamber of Commerce, of which he is a past Chair,
Transportation California, the Monterey Bay Area Council of the
Boy Scouts of America, and the California Business Roundtable.
He holds a B.A. degree in Economics from Cornell University.
Age 70.
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Fernando
Niebla Director
since 1999
Mr. Niebla has served as
President of International Technology Partners L.L.C., an
information technology consulting company based in Orange
County, California since August 1998. Mr. Niebla is a
director of Life Modeler Inc., Union Bank of California, Pacific
Life Corp and Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc. He holds a
B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of
Arizona and an M.S. QBA from the University of Southern
California. Age 69.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary M.
Cusumano Director
since 2005
Mr. Cusumano retired in
2006 as Chairman of The Newhall Land and Farming Company, a
developer of new towns and master-planned communities in north
Los Angeles County, in which capacity he served since Lennar and
LNR Properties acquired Newhall Land in 2004. Prior to the
acquisition, he served as Chief Executive Officer from 2001 to
2004, and director since 1995. He is currently a director of
Forest Lawn Memorial Parks and Mortuaries and Simpson
Manufacturing Co. Mr. Cusumano holds a B.S. degree in
Economics from the University of California, Davis and is a
graduate of the Sloan Program at the Stanford University
Business School. Age 65.
|
6
Information about
the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance
Committees of the
Board
The following chart shows the standing committees of the Board
of Director, membership and the number of meetings held in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit/
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Strategic
|
|
|
|
|
Compliance
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Governance
|
|
Planning
|
|
Executive
|
Claes G. Bjork*
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
James W. Bradford, Jr.*
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chair
|
|
|
Gary M. Cusumano*
|
|
|
|
Chair
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
William G. Dorey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
David H. Kelsey*
|
|
Chair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rebecca A. McDonald*
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
Chair
|
|
|
|
X
|
J. Fernando Niebla*
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
William H.
Powell*(1)
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
David H. Watts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Chair
|
Number of Meetings in 2008
|
|
9
|
|
7
|
|
6
|
|
2(2)
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Presiding Director |
(2) |
|
The Committee also worked with management independently on
various strategic initiatives throughout the year. |
Audit/Compliance
Committee
A description of the functions and activities of the
Audit/Compliance Committee can be found in the Report of
the Audit/Compliance Committee on Page 43 of this
proxy statement and in the Audit/Compliance Committee charter.
All members of the Committee are non-employee directors who are,
and at all times during 2008 were, qualified as independent
under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. Each
member also satisfies the Securities and Exchange
Commissions (the SEC) requirement of
independence. The Board has determined that Mr. Kelsey
meets the criteria as an audit committee financial expert as
defined by SEC rules. The Board of Directors has also determined
that all members of the Committee are financially literate as
required by the listing standards of the New York Stock
Exchange. You can view and print the Audit/Compliance Committee
charter on Granites website (see Granite
Website on Page 13).
Compensation
Committee
All members of the Committee are non-employee directors who are,
and at all times during 2008 were, qualified as independent
under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The
Committee reviews all aspects of compensation for our directors,
the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, and
overall compensation plans and strategies and then makes
recommendations to the Board for their consideration and
approval. The Chief Executive Officer attends Committee meetings
and recommends
7
annual salary levels, incentive compensation and payouts for
other executive officers for the Committees approval. The
Compensation Committee also administers the Amended and Restated
1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan) with respect
to persons subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. In the case of awards intended to qualify for the
performance-based compensation exemption under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), the Plan is administered only by
the Compensation Committee, which includes at least two
non-employee directors within the meaning of
Section 162(m). If you desire additional information
concerning the Compensation Committee, you can read the
Compensation Committee charter on Granites website (see
Granite Website on Page 13).
Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee
All members of the Committee are non-employee directors who are,
and at all times during 2008 were, qualified as independent
under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends and
nominates persons to serve on the Board. The Committee also
develops and recommends corporate governance principles and
practices to the Board and annually reviews the Boards
performance. The Committees policy for considering
director candidates, including shareholder recommendations, is
discussed in more detail below under the heading Board of
Directors Nomination Policy. This policy and the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter are
available on Granites website (see Granite
Website on Page 13).
Strategic
Planning Committee
The Strategic Planning Committee reviews and recommends for
approval the Strategic Plan developed by management and provides
overall strategic planning direction. The Committee also works
with management independently on various strategic initiatives
throughout the year.
Executive
Committee
The Executive Committees responsibility is to carry out
the powers and authority of the Board in the management of
Granites business within limits set by the Board. The
scope of the Committees authority is determined in
accordance with the Delegation of Authority and
Policy as adopted and revised from time to time by the
Board. Non-employee members of the Executive Committee do not
receive any meeting fees or other compensation for their service
on the Committee.
Role of the
Compensation Consultant
Granite has retained Mercer (US) Inc. (Mercer) to
provide information, analyses, and advice regarding executive
compensation, as described below. The Mercer consultant who
performs these services reports to the Vice President of Human
Resources and the Director of Compensation and Benefits. At the
direction of the Vice President of Human Resources, Mercer
provided the following services to Granite during fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated the competitive positioning of our named executive
officers base salaries, annual incentive and long-term
incentive compensation relative to our primary peer companies
and the broader industry;
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
Advised on 2009 target award levels within the annual and
long-term incentive program and, as needed, on actual
compensation actions;
|
|
|
|
Assessed the alignment of company compensation levels relative
to our performance against our primary peer companies and
relative to the Compensation Committees articulated
compensation philosophy;
|
|
|
|
Provided advice on the design of Granites 2009 annual and
long-term incentive plans;
|
|
|
|
Advised on the 2009 performance measures and performance targets
for the annual and long-term incentive programs; and
|
|
|
|
Assisted with the preparation of the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis for this proxy statement.
|
In the course of conducting its activities, Mercer attended
three meetings of the Compensation Committee and presented its
findings and recommendations for discussion.
All of the decisions with respect to determining the amount or
form of executive and director compensation under our executive
and director compensation programs are made by the Compensation
Committee alone and may reflect factors and considerations other
than the information and advice provided by Mercer.
Executive
Sessions and the Presiding Director
At each regular Board of Directors meeting, the Board
schedules an executive session that consists entirely of
non-employee directors. In 2008, the Board elected William H.
Powell as the Presiding Director. The Presiding Director
presides over executive sessions of the independent members of
the Board and over all meetings at which the Chairman of the
Board is not present. In addition, he or she acts as a liaison
between the Chairman and the Board, and assists in setting the
Board meeting agenda. A new Presiding Director is elected every
two years.
Board of
Directors Nomination Policy
Evaluation
Criteria and Procedures
Members of the Board of Directors of Granite are divided into
three classes and are nominated for election for staggered
three-year terms. The Board, its members, its committee
structure and performance and its overall governance performance
are continuously reviewed. Included in this review is a careful
evaluation of the mix of skills and experience of Board members
weighed against Granites current and emerging operating
and strategic challenges and opportunities. These evaluations
are made on the basis of observations and interviews with
management and with Board members conducted annually by the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, with the
assistance of an independent executive search firm. The
activities of the executive search firm are coordinated by the
Director of Human Resources.
9
Current Board members whose performance, capabilities, and
experience meet Granites expectations and needs are
nominated for reelection in the year of their terms
completion. In accordance with Granites Corporate
Governance Guidelines, Board members are not re-nominated after
they reach their
72nd birthday.
Each member of the Board of Directors must meet a set of core
criteria, referred to as the three Cs:
Character, Capability, and Commitment. Granite was founded by
persons of outstanding character, and it is Granites
intention to ensure that it continues to be governed by persons
of high integrity and worthy of the trust of its shareholders.
Further, Granite intends to recruit and select persons whose
capabilities, including their educational background, their work
and life experiences, and their demonstrated records of
performance will ensure that Granites Board will have the
balance of expertise and judgment required for its long-term
performance and growth. Finally, Granite will recruit and select
only those persons who demonstrate that they have the commitment
to devote the time, energy, and effort required to guarantee
that Granite will have the highest possible level of leadership
and governance.
In addition to the three Cs, the Board recruitment and
selection process assures that the Board composition meets all
of the relevant standards for independence and specific
expertise. For each new recruitment process, a set of specific
criteria is determined by the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee with the assistance of the executive search
firm and the Chairman of the Board, utilizing the interview
process noted above. These criteria may specify, for example,
the type of industry or geographic experience that would be
useful to maintain and improve the balance of skills and
knowledge on the Board. After the search criteria are
established, the executive search firm utilizes its professional
skills and its data sources and contacts, including current
Granite Board members and officers, to seek appropriate
candidates. The credentials of a set of qualified candidates
provided by the search process are submitted for review by the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Chairman of
the Board and senior officers. Based on this review, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee invites the top
candidates for personal interviews with the Committee and
Granites executive management team.
Normally, the search, review, and interview process results in a
single nominee to fill a specific vacancy. However, a given
search may be aimed at producing more than one nominee and the
search for a single nominee may result in two candidates of such
capability and character that both might be nominated, with term
classes restructured following additional vacancies.
It is Granites intention that this search and nomination
process consider qualified candidates referred by a wide variety
of sources, including all of Granites
constituents its customers, employees, shareholders,
and members of the communities in which it operates. The search
firm will include all referrals in its screening process and
bring qualified candidates to the attention of the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee is responsible for assuring that all
relevant sources of potential candidates have been canvassed.
Shareholder
Recommendation and Direct Nomination of Board
Candidates
Consistent with our bylaws and the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee Charter, Granite will review and consider
for nomination any candidate for membership to the Board
recommended by a shareholder, in accordance with the evaluation
criteria and selection process described above. Shareholders
wishing to recommend a candidate for consideration in connection
with an election at a specific annual meeting should notify
Granite well in advance of the meeting date to allow adequate
time for
10
the review process and preparation of the proxy statement, and
in no event later than the date specified below with respect to
direct nominations.
In addition, Granites bylaws provide that any shareholder
entitled to vote in the election of directors may directly
nominate a candidate or candidates for election at a meeting
provided that timely notice of his or her intention to make such
nomination is given. To be timely, a shareholder nomination for
a director to be elected at an annual meeting must be received
by Granite not less than 120 days prior to the first
anniversary of the date the proxy statement for the preceding
years annual meeting of shareholders was released to
shareholders and must contain the information specified in our
bylaws. The Committee will consider nominees to the Board
recommended by shareholders as long as the shareholder gives
timely notice in writing of his or her intent to nominate a
director. To be timely, a shareholder nomination for a director
to be elected at the 2010 annual meeting must be received at
Granites principal office, addressed to the Corporate
Secretary, on or before December 2, 2009.
Director
Independence
Under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, a
director is considered independent if the Board determines that
the director has no material relationship with Granite. In
determining independence, the Board considers pertinent facts
and circumstances including commercial, industrial, banking,
consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial
relationships, among others. The Board follows these guidelines
when assessing the independence of a director:
|
|
|
|
|
A director who, within the last three years is, or has been, an
employee of Granite or whose immediate family member is, or has
been within the last three years, an executive officer of
Granite, may not be deemed independent until three years after
the end of such employment relationship. Employment as an
interim Chairman, Chief Executive Officer or other executive
officer shall not disqualify a director from being considered
independent following that employment.
|
|
|
|
A director who has received, or has an immediate family member
who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last
three years more than $120,000 in direct compensation from
Granite, other than director and committee fees and pension or
other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided
such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued
service), may not be deemed independent. Compensation received
by a director for former service as an interim Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer or other executive officer and compensation
received by an immediate family member for service as an
employee of Granite (other than an executive officer) will not
be considered in determining independence under this test.
|
|
|
|
The following directors may not be deemed independent:
(A) a director who is affiliated with or employed by or
whose immediate family member is a current partner of a firm
that is Granites internal or external auditor; (B) a
director who is a current employee of such a firm; (C) a
director who has an immediate family member who is a current
employee of such a firm and who participates in the firms
audit, assurance or tax compliance practice; or (D) a
director or immediate family member who was within the last
three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally
worked on Granites audit within that time.
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
A director who or whose immediate family member is, or has been
within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of
another company where any of Granites present executive
officers at the same time serves or served on that
companys compensation committee may not be deemed
independent.
|
|
|
|
A director who is a current employee or whose immediate family
member is a current executive officer of a company that has made
payments to, or received payments from, Granite for property or
services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal
years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such
other companys consolidated gross revenues for that fiscal
year may not be deemed independent.
|
The Board reviews the independence of all non-employee directors
every year. For the review, the Board relies on information from
responses to questionnaires completed by directors and other
sources. Directors are required to immediately inform the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of any material
changes in their or their immediate family members
relationships or circumstances that could impact or change their
independence status.
During 2008, all non-employee directors who served on the Board
for all or a part of the year, were identified as independent
under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange;
namely, Claes G. Bjork, James W. Bradford, Jr., Gary M.
Cusumano, David H. Kelsey, Rebecca A. McDonald, J. Fernando
Niebla and William H. Powell.
Board and Annual
Shareholder Meeting Attendance
During 2008, the Board of Directors held nine meetings. All
directors as a group attended an average of 99% of the total
number of meetings of the Board and any committee on which they
served. Except for irreconcilable conflicts, directors are
expected to attend the annual shareholder meeting. The Annual
Meeting Attendance Policy is a part of Granites Board of
Directors Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies and is
posted on Granites website (see Granite
Website below). All directors attended Granites 2008
annual shareholder meeting.
Communications
with the Board
Any shareholder or other interested party wishing to communicate
with the Board of Directors, or any particular director,
including the Presiding Director, can do so by following the
process described in the Communications with the Board of
Directors Policy. The policy is posted on Granites website
(see Granite Website below).
Code of
Conduct
Granites Code of Conduct applies to all Granite employees,
including the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive
Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and all directors. The Code
of Conduct is available on Granites website at
www.graniteconstruction.com at the About Us
site under Core Values. We will also
12
post any amendments to the Code of Conduct at this location on
our website. You can obtain a copy of the Code of Conduct,
without charge, by contacting Granites Human Resources
Department at 831.724.1011.
Granite
Website
The following charters and policies are available on
Granites website at the Corporate Governance site under
Investor Relations at www.graniteconstruction.com: the
Audit/Compliance Committee Charter, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee
Charter, the Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies, the
Board of Directors Nomination Policy, the Shareholder
Communication to the Board Policy and Granites Code of
Conduct. You can also request copies of these charters and
policies in print without charge by contacting Granites
Investor Relations Department at 831.761.4714.
Executive and
Director Compensation and Other Matters
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Compensation
Philosophy
Compensation paid to Granites named executive officers
(the Chief Executive Officer, ex-Chief Financial Officer,
current Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and
Granite West and Granite East Managers, or NEOs) is
structured to align with our short-term and long-term
performance objectives. The Compensation Committee believes that
the most effective way to enhance company performance is to
emphasize variable compensation. Both financial metrics such as
return on net assets (RONA), weighted average cost
of capital (WACC), and adjusted operating income
(AOI) and non-financial metrics such as safety are
utilized as performance measures.
Until 2007, NEO base salaries were positioned around the market
25th percentile emphasizing the opportunity to earn market
competitive total compensation through short- and long-term
incentives. The market for executive talent is highly
competitive, and it is important that Granite be well-positioned
to attract, retain and reward key management. In order to align
Granites executive compensation program with market best
practices, the Compensation Committee revised its philosophy to
target market median-base salaries. For 2008, the Compensation
Committee considered the following factors in setting executive
compensation levels:
|
|
|
|
|
Market median compensation levels for all elements of
compensation, i.e., base salary, short- and long-term incentives
and total direct compensation as the first point of reference;
|
|
|
|
Individual performance and potential to impact business
performance; and
|
|
|
|
Talent attraction and retention needs.
|
Adjustments were made to NEO compensation levels, compensation
mix and performance objectives in 2008 as a step towards
aligning NEO compensation with the
above-stated
philosophy. These changes are discussed in greater detail in the
following pages. As stated above, the Committee believes that
13
the changes made to the NEO program in 2008 enhance the market
competitiveness of the program and better align executive
efforts with Company performance and shareholder value creation.
Objective of the
Compensation Program
The objective of the compensation program is to attract and
retain talented, creative, experienced executives who possess
the skills and leadership qualities necessary to compete in the
marketplace, encourage the delivery of consistent financial
performance and growth of shareholder value. Key elements of the
program are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Base salaries are at or near the 50th percentile of base
salaries for comparable positions in the market;
|
|
|
|
Cash and stock-based incentives are earned upon the attainment
of pre-established financial and safety goals; and
|
|
|
|
A comprehensive benefits program available to all salaried
employees. The benefits provided include medical, dental,
vision, life and accidental death and disability insurance,
short- and long-term disability, paid vacation and holiday pay.
NEOs are eligible along with other key management employees, to
participate in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Program
and a program offering periodic medical examinations.
|
Market Data
Considered in Determining Executive Compensation
Each year the Compensation Committee reviews available industry
compensation data to establish the compensation that the NEOs
can earn if performance targets are reached. Data is reviewed
from benchmark companies with comparable annual revenue and
assets. Threshold and maximum levels of compensation are linked
to expectations for business performance that would justify
payment of compensation. The Compensation Committee defines and
approves the threshold and maximum performance goals for the
NEOs.
In 2008 the Compensation Committee reviewed market compensation
data from the following two sources:
1. A peer group of
six public companies - These companies represent the
construction and engineering and construction materials industry
that compete for executive talent in the same market as Granite.
The table below lists the names of the companies and their
annual revenues and total assets for
14
their most recent fiscal years. At the time the Committee
reviewed the market data, Granites fiscal 2008 revenues
and total assets were $2,737,914 and $1,786,418, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
(FY07)
|
|
(FY07)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
Company Name
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perini Corp.
|
|
4,628
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Group Intl Inc.
|
|
3,398
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quanta Services Inc.
|
|
2,656
|
|
3,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Marietta Materials
|
|
2,207
|
|
2,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Industries Inc.
|
|
1,029
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vulcan Materials Co.
|
|
3,328
|
|
8,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Private company
market data was provided by Analytical/FMI, a compensation
consulting company that gathers extensive compensation data for
companies in the engineering and construction industries. The
companies participating in the survey are composed of companies
competing with Granite for key engineering and construction
talent. The Compensation Committee selected private companies
with employee headcount and revenue similar to Granites.
3. An equally weighted
blend of public company data and private company data was used
to develop market composites for base salary and target total
cash compensation. However, as almost all private companies do
not report long-term incentive data, only peer group public
company compensation data derived from proxy statements was used
as a reference for long-term incentive and total direct
compensation.
Compensation
Elements and Reasons for Payment
Base
Salary
Consistent with Granites historical compensation
philosophy, NEO base salaries were generally positioned around
the 25th percentile of their respective market composites.
Given the shift from a 25th percentile to a
50th percentile pay philosophy, the Committee approved the
following salary increases for NEOs in 2008. With an exception
to the Chief Executive Officer, these increases positioned the
other four NEOs closer to the market 50th percentile. The
Chief Executive Officers base salary was increased by 11%,
the Chief Operating Officers by 14%, the Chief Financial
Officers by 31%, the Granite West Managers by 15%,
and the Granite East Managers by 25%. LeAnne M. Stewart,
the current Chief Financial Officer was hired in February 2008
with a base salary close to the
50th percentile.
Granites former Chief Financial Officer, William E.
Barton, assumed the interim position of Senior Vice President
and Assistant Secretary effective March 1, 2008 to ensure a
smooth transition to the new Chief Financial Officer. As part of
the strategy to ensure a successful transition,
Mr. Bartons last pay levels were maintained through
the transition period. He retired from Granite in August 2008.
15
Incentive
Compensation
The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Operating Officer participate in the Corporate Incentive Plan,
and the Granite West and Granite East Managers participate in
the Corporate and Division Incentive Plan. The Corporate
Incentive Plan uses RONA measured against a WACC hurdle and
safety as performance measures, whereas the
Division Incentive Plan uses division AOI and division
safety as performance measures. Both plans are discussed in
detail on the following pages. Table 1 provides a breakdown of
maximum incentive opportunity, corporate vs. division weights
for all NEOs. The plan provides for cash and stock-based
(restricted stock) awards of final annual incentive earned by
the NEOs. Specifically:
|
|
|
|
|
Payout is in cash for RONA performance under the Corporate
Incentive Plan from threshold to the point where RONA equals
WACC, for AOI performance under the Division Incentive Plan
from threshold to target division AOI performance and for
safety performance from threshold to maximum safety performance.
|
|
|
|
Payout is in service-based restricted stock for RONA performance
above WACC to the maximum payout and for AOI performance to the
maximum payout. Restricted stock is subject to a three year
ratable vesting schedule, except as described below. The vesting
schedule is designed to encourage and reward
decision-making
which ensures sustained financial performance over the long
term. The number of shares earned by each NEO is determined by
dividing the dollar amount of the applicable portion of the
executives incentive by the average daily closing stock
price in the first 30 days of January of the performance
year. Once granted, restricted stock serves as a retention tool
and provides the NEOs with a longer term incentive to grow
shareholder value as vesting occurs ratably over five years from
the grant date. Prior to 2008, restricted stock grants vested at
the end of five years. Executives age 55 with 10 years
of service are eligible for an accelerated vesting schedule,
i.e., ratable vesting in equal percentages over five years.
Grants made prior to 2008 will be grandfathered in line with the
provisions explained above. NEOs 62 years of age or older,
with 10 years of service, receive the stock portion of
their incentive in
fully-vested
stock or, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, they
may be awarded cash in lieu of restricted stock.
|
16
Table 1 -
Incentive Weighting (Corporate and Division Programs) and
Opportunity - 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Delivered in
|
|
|
Program
|
|
Program
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Weighting
|
|
Weighting
|
|
Opportunity
|
|
Cash
|
|
Stock
|
Name
|
|
(%)
|
|
(%)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
William G.
Dorey(1)
President &
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeAnne M.
Stewart(2)
Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
770,000
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Boitano
Executive Vice President
& Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H. Roberts
Senior Vice President &
Granite West Manager
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Donnino
Senior Vice President &
Granite East Manager
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E.
Barton(1)
Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(Retired)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
420,000
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Mr. Dorey and Mr. Barton are
62 years of age and satisfy the service criterion of
10 years. The restricted stock portion of their incentive
payout would be fully vested.
(2) Ms. Stewarts incentive is prorated on
11 months of performance since her start date with Granite
was February 4, 2008.
Corporate
Incentive Program: Performance Measures and Mechanics
The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Operating Officer earn 100%, and the Granite West and Granite
East Managers earn 30% of their incentive compensation under the
Corporate Incentive Program. Ten percent of the cash incentive
opportunity under the Corporate Incentive Plan is based on the
Total Safety Incident Rate (TSIR) performance. The remainder is
based on RONA.
Return on Net
Assets
RONA is calculated by dividing the net income Granite earned in
the year ended December 31, 2008 by its weighted average
net assets, adjusted for the purpose of calculating incentive
compensation
17
(total weighted average of assets less current liabilities,
long-term debt, an estimated value of quarry property which will
not be mined within the next five years, and deferred income
taxes).
RONA performance objectives for a given plan year are set based
on Granites WACC. WACC is defined as Granites
blended cost of debt and equity. The WACC calculation was
approved by the Compensation Committee and was set at 9% for
2008 for the purpose of calculating incentive compensation. The
Corporate Incentive Program incorporates RONA and WACC as the
primary metrics because of the significant capital needs of the
business. Granites operations require sizable investment
in capital equipment and aggregate reserves, which require
periodic replacement. Both the Division Incentive Program
and the Corporate Incentive Program are designed to reward high
returns on the net assets employed. Reaching targeted returns on
net assets and high returns on revenue will generate the cash
necessary to replace assets as needed and provide the cash
necessary for growth and fair dividend returns to the
shareholders. In this way, the incentive compensation paid to
the NEOs is aligned with the metrics that directly affect the
financial health of Granite and the long-term interests of the
shareholders.
The maximum RONA objective is established at a level that the
Compensation Committee considers indicative of superior
performance. In determining the maximum RONA objective, the
Compensation Committee considers Granites RONA history,
industry comparisons, growth rate, new investment in the
business, cost of capital, and the current market conditions
Granite is experiencing. The maximum RONA objective is reviewed
annually by the Compensation Committee, as is the amount of
incentive compensation that can be earned by each of the NEOs if
the maximum compensation RONA target is reached.
In 2008, the WACC was set at 9%. Threshold RONA was set at 4.5%
which was 50% of WACC, and maximum RONA was set at 15%. Actual
RONA achieved in 2008 was 16.30%.
Safety
In keeping with our policy of honoring our employees by
providing the safest work environment in the industry, the Total
Safety Incident Rate (TSIR) targets were established
in early 2006 as part of Granites strategic plan of
reducing the TSIR to 6.0 by 2010. The safety measure objectives
are determined based on management expectations and historical
performance. In 2008, to ensure progress towards the 2010
objective and focus executive efforts on minimizing accidents
and fatalities, safety was made a part of the executive
incentive plan. In relation to this strategy, the 2008 TSIR
target was set at 7.3. Ten percent of each NEOs cash
incentive opportunity was tied to this target. No safety-related
incentive was payable under the Corporate Incentive Plan if
Granite experienced an employee work-related fatality during the
plan year.
18
The safety goal uses the TSIR to determine whether there has
been an overall increase or decrease in safety incidents. Three
separate injury rate measures are added to determine the overall
TSIR:
A. Total Injury Incident Rate
(TIIR) tracks all injuries requiring an employee to
be treated by a health care professional, even if the treatment
provided is minor.
B. OSHA Recordable Injury Rate
(ORIR) tracks all injuries serious enough to require
OSHA documentation (i.e., medical treatment, restricted duty,
lost time).
C. Lost Time Injury Rate
(LTIR) tracks all injuries serious enough to cause
an injured employee to be away from work for any days beyond the
day of the injury.
Incident Rate
Calculation
Incident rates, which represent the number of events per 100
full-time employees, are calculated by multiplying the number of
events by category (total injuries, OSHA recordable injuries or
lost time Injuries) by 200,000 (2,000 hours per employee,
per year x 100 employees) and divided by the total number
of hours of employee exposure.
For example, in 2008 there were 12,144,655 hours of
employee exposure, and the injuries reported were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Total Injuries
|
|
= 225
|
|
|
OSHA Recordable Injuries
|
|
= 172
|
|
|
Lost Time Injuries
|
|
= 58
|
|
|
The Total Safety Incident Rate for 2008 was calculated as
follows:
|
|
|
Total Injury Incident Rate
|
|
= 225 X 200,000/12,144,655 = 3.7
|
OSHA Recordable Injury Rate
|
|
= 172 X 200,000/12,144,655 = 2.8
|
Lost Time Injury Rate
|
|
= 58 X 200,000/12,144,655 = 1.0
|
Total Safety Incident Rate
|
|
= (TIIR + ORIR + LTIR) = 7.5
|
For 2008, the threshold, target and maximum safety objectives
for 2008 were set at 9.5 (130% of TSIR target), 7.3 (100% of
TSIR target) and 5.1 (70% of TSIR target), respectively. The
target objective reflects Granites plan (as illustrated
above) to achieve a 6.0 TSIR by 2010. In 2008, the Corporate
Safety Incentive was not achieved due to an employee fatality,
and the portion of cash payout tied to the safety component was
not paid.
19
Table
2 Actual Payouts in March 2009 for 2008
Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Cash
|
|
Paid in Restricted
|
|
|
Earned
|
|
Incentives
|
|
Stock
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(# of Shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William G. Dorey
President &
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
1,930,000
|
|
630,000
|
|
$1,300,000 (37,281)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeAnne M. Stewart
Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
748,000
|
|
198,000
|
|
$550,000 (15,773)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Boitano
Executive Vice President &
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
1,350,000
|
|
450,000
|
|
$900,000 (25,810)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Barton
Senior Vice President
|
|
408,000
|
|
108,000
|
|
$300,000 (8,603)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity awards earned in 2008 were granted on March 13,
2009. The number of shares earned was determined by dividing the
dollar amount of the executives share-based incentive by
$34.87, the average of the daily closing stock price in the
first 30 days of January of the performance year. LeAnne M.
Stewarts incentive earned was prorated based on
11 months of performance since her start date with Granite
on February 4, 2008. William E. Bartons incentive
earned was prorated based on six months of performance and
his retirement mid-year from Granite.
Division Incentive
Program Performance: Performance Measures and
Mechanics
The Granite West and Granite East Managers earn 70% of their
incentive compensation from a program based on the performance
of their respective divisions known as the
Division Incentive Program. This weighting is designed to
ensure that the most significant portion of their potential
incentive compensation is directly tied to the AOI and safety
performance of their division, while a smaller percentage is
based on Granites overall performance.
AOI is defined as actual operating income adjusted for
pre-defined profit or loss items such as interest earned or
charged on operating cash flow and accounting eliminations for
such items as equipment transfers and materials sales between
business units.
Under the Division Incentive Program, executives begin to
earn incentive compensation when Division AOI exceeds an
initial threshold consisting of allocated corporate overhead and
a charge for the cost of the assets employed by the applicable
division. The maximum cash and stock incentive for the
Division Incentive Program is paid when a divisions
AOI target is achieved. The Division AOI targets, as well
as the maximum incentive that can be earned by each
Division Manager if this target is achieved, are set
annually by the Chief Executive Officer and reviewed and
approved by the Compensation Committee. In determining
Division AOI targets, consideration is given to the size of
the division, the value of the net assets employed, recent
division performance history, and current market conditions. If
the Division AOI target is not achieved, the actual cash
and stock incentive paid is based on a straight line pro-ration
of actual
20
Division AOI compared to the Division AOI target.
Restricted stock awarded under the Division Incentive
Program is subject to a three-year ratable vesting schedule.
In the past five years, including 2008, the Granite West
Division AOI threshold has been reached in four of those
years. During the same period the maximum Division AOI has
been achieved for four years by the Granite West Division.
In the past five years, including 2008, the Granite East
Division AOI threshold has been reached in one of those
years. During the same period the maximum Division AOI has
not been attained by the Granite East Division.
In 2008, the Granite West Division Manager earned incentive
compensation of $934,728 of which $645,228 was for attainment of
division goals, and $289,500 was for achievement of corporate
goals. Division financial results accounted for $627,410 in
incentive compensation of which $220,500 was paid in cash and
$406,910 was paid in restricted stock. A cash payment of $17,818
was paid for performance between the threshold and target safety
goal.
In 2008, the Granite East Division Manager earned incentive
compensation of $760,075 of which $499,075 was for attainment of
division financial results and $261,000 was for achievement of
corporate goals. The cash component earned based on the
divisions financial results was $189,000 and the remaining
$310,075 was paid as restricted stock. The safety goal was not
earned due to a work fatality within the division.
|
|
Table 3 -
|
Incentive
Compensation (Cash and Restricted Stock) Earned under the
Corporate and Division Incentive Programs in 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Cash
|
|
Paid in Restricted
|
|
|
Earned
|
|
Incentives
|
|
Stock
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(# of Shares)
|
James H. Roberts
Senior Vice President and
Granite West Manager
|
|
934,728
|
|
332,818
|
|
$601,910 (17,262)
|
Michael F. Donnino
Senior Vice President and
Granite East Manager
|
|
760,075
|
|
270,000
|
|
$490,075 (14,054)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity awards earned in 2008 were granted on March 13,
2009. The number of shares earned was determined by dividing the
dollar amount of the executives incentive by $34.87, the
average of the daily closing stock price in the first
30 days of January of the performance year.
Profit Sharing
Bonus
Granite maintains a Profit Sharing Bonus Plan that provides a
discretionary cash bonus to all salaried employees hired prior
to August 1 of the performance (calendar) year. The purpose of
the plan is to focus employee effort on Granites
profitability. In 2008, the Compensation Committee approved a
bonus amount of $12 million. This amount was determined
after taking into consideration anticipated 2008
21
profitability, liquidity needs and near-term planned uses of
excess cash. The bonus allocated to salaried employees is based
on earned compensation and translated to 7.846% on the first
$230,000 of NEO base compensation which is listed under the
Profit Sharing Bonus Plan in the All Other
Compensation table on Page 30.
Policy Regarding
Recovery of Award if Basis Changes Because of
Restatement
If the basis upon which a previous compensation award is made
changes because of a restatement of a prior years
financial results, and the previous award is determined to be an
overpayment, it is Granites policy to either recover the
amount overpaid or to hold the overpayment as a debit against
future incentive compensation earned. There were no adjustments
to calculations that affected incentive compensation calculated
or paid in 2008.
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
Effective January 1, 2008, Granite replaced its 2005 Key
Management Deferred Compensation Plan and 2005 Key Management
Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan. The Granite Construction
Key Management Deferred Compensation Plan II became the
successor plan which:
|
|
|
|
|
Allows key executives to defer incentive compensation and
Employee Stock Ownership (ESOP) dividends. Executives can defer
up to 100% of their annual cash bonus, ESOP dividends and Profit
Sharing Cash Bonus;
|
|
|
|
Provides a company matching contribution of 6% on the first
$100,000 that the employee defers and is credited at the time of
deferral. Prior to January 1, 2008, Granite credited
participants with a matching contribution, equal to the
percentage elected under the Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan, not
to exceed $6,000;
|
|
|
|
Allows NEOs, who are at least 62 years of age and have
10 years of service on the last day of the performance
period, to defer receipt of 100% of the restricted stock payable
under the performance unit agreement. A quarterly dividend
equivalent is credited to NEOs who make this deferral election.
Deferred performance units will be distributed as shares of
Granite common stock; and
|
|
|
|
Allows for interest to be credited monthly based on the
30-day
average of the Lehman Brothers long-term bond index determined
as of December 1 of the year prior to the plan year, plus
100 basis points. In 2008, the rate was 5.63%.
|
In August 2008, the Compensation Committee approved a number of
amendments to the Key Management Deferred Compensation Plan II.
The amendments were designed to reduce costs associated with the
Key Management Deferred Compensation Plan II and at the
same time offer participants greater investment choices
and financial protection. The amendments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
A Rabbi Trust was established to be funded with historical
deferrals over a four-year period. All new deferrals will be
held in the Trust. By holding the assets within a Trust,
participants have added security that future benefit obligations
will be satisfied;
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-owned life insurance was added providing an
opportunity for Granite to save money by reducing the corporate
tax expense on the Key Management Deferred Compensation
Plan II assets. Participants can voluntarily consent for
Granite to purchase life insurance on their behalf and are
eligible for a survivor benefit equal to one years base
salary payable in the event of death. The survivor benefit is
payable only while employed with Granite;
|
|
|
|
A menu of investment options for deferral into non-qualified
deferred compensation plan accounts was provided to
participants. Granite will determine the investment options for
the Plan menu and will be permitted to add or remove investment
options from the plan based on a review of the performance of
the particular investment; and
|
|
|
|
Participants will no longer receive from Granite interest
payments based on the Lehman Brothers long-term bond index. All
gains and losses to participants accounts will be incurred
based on the participants investment choices and market
performance.
|
The Rabbi Trust and corporate-owned life insurance were
implemented on October 1, 2008. The menu of investment
options with gains or losses to participants accounts
determined by market fluctuations was implemented
January 1, 2009.
All Other
Compensation
The NEOs are eligible to participate in the Granite Construction
Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan. Granite provides matching
contributions on compensation deferred as 401(k) contributions
not to exceed 6% of IRS qualified compensation up to $230,000.
NEOs are provided insurance for personal and auto liability, as
well as auto physical damage and umbrella liability.
Impact of
Accounting and Tax Treatments of a Particular Form of
Compensation
We provide certain stock-based compensation under our Amended
and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan),
which is accounted for under FASB Statement No 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R). Restricted stock compensation cost
is measured as the stocks fair value based on the market
price at the date of grant. Restricted stock compensation cost
is recognized on a pro-rated basis over the vesting period or
the period from the grant date to the first maturity date after
the holder reaches age 62 and has completed certain
specified years of service, when all restricted shares become
fully vested.
Salary and cash incentive payments and deferred compensation are
taxable to the executive officer in the year they are paid.
Restricted stock incentives are taxable income to the executive
officer and provide an income tax deduction for Granite in the
year the stock vests. Granite expenses salary and cash incentive
payments in the year they are earned.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the
Code) disallows a federal income tax deduction to
publicly held companies for certain compensation paid to certain
of their NEOs, to the extent that compensation exceeds
$1 million per executive officer in any fiscal year. This
limitation applies only to compensation that is not considered
performance-based under the Section 162(m) rules. Our
executive
23
compensation programs have been structured so that any
compensation deemed paid in connection with the program is
intended to qualify as performance-based compensation which will
not be subject to the $1 million limitation.
2009 Executive
Compensation Program
The 2009 NEO compensation program is materially different from
2008 and reflects Granites and the Compensation
Committees ongoing efforts to better align pay levels and
program design with market best practices and long-term
shareholder value creation. As the next step to enhance market
competitiveness of the Companys NEO compensation program,
the Compensation Committee approved the following principal
components of the 2009 NEO compensation program:
|
|
|
|
|
No adjustments to base salary compensation;
|
|
|
|
Incentive adjustments to align total direct compensation with
market median levels;
|
|
|
|
Individual total direct compensation opportunity defined at
three levels - threshold, target and maximum. In 2008,
total direct compensation was defined at maximum levels;
|
|
|
|
A stand-alone annual incentive plan based on RONA, operating
cash flow margin, safety and strategic measures, AOI and safety
measures, as applicable; and
|
|
|
|
A separate stand-alone long-term incentive plan based on
3-year
average economic profit and total shareholder return
(TSR) performance relative to a comparator group of
companies.
|
The 2009 NEO compensation program design further strengthens the
relationship between pay and shareholder value creation by
introducing additional performance measures and increasing the
difficulty level of performance hurdles. The specifics of the
compensation opportunity, plan design and performance objectives
will be discussed in greater detail in our 2010 proxy statement.
Severance
Arrangement
Our Chief Financial Officer, LeAnne M. Stewart, is eligible to
receive severance benefits if her employment is terminated
without cause. Termination with cause would include some of the
following reasons: unauthorized disclosure of confidential
information; conviction of a felony; misappropriation of Granite
assets; and violation of Granites code of conduct. In the
event of her termination without cause, Ms. Stewart would
receive the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Continued vesting of unvested equity grants for a period of
12 months; and
|
|
|
|
Lump sum cash benefits equal to (1) the then current
years annual incentive plan target bonus prorated for the
number of days in service for the given year, and (2) one
years base salary at the rate in effect at the time of
termination.
|
24
These cash benefits will be paid in 30 days from the date
of termination. Granite provided this benefit to incentivize
Ms. Stewart to join Granite with the understanding that in
the event she was terminated without cause she would not be
adversely impacted financially. A similar benefit has not been
provided to the remaining NEOs, each of whom has been employed
with Granite for at least 27 years.
Change-in-Control
Arrangements
Currently, all NEOs along with 11 other key employees approved
by the Compensation Committee are participants in the Executive
Retention and Severance Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to:
|
|
|
|
|
Provide an incentive to the existing management to remain with
Granite during a potential acquisition in order to obtain the
best terms for the shareholders or to assure Granites
viability in executing its strategy if Granite remains
independent; and
|
|
|
|
Attract and retain executives by reducing their concerns
regarding future employment following a change of control.
|
The Executive Retention and Severance Plan provides that if an
executive officers employment with Granite is terminated
within three years after a change in control of
Granite, or if the executive officer terminates for good
reason, the executive officer will be entitled to the
following benefits unless his or her employment is terminated
for cause:
|
|
|
|
|
A lump sum payment equal to three times the executive
officers annual base salary rate in effect immediately
prior to the executive officers termination upon a change
in control;
|
|
|
|
A lump sum payment equal to three times the average of the
aggregate of all annual incentive bonuses earned by the
executive officer for the three fiscal years immediately
preceding the fiscal year of the change in control;
|
|
|
|
A lump sum payment equal to the average of the aggregate annual
employer contribution, less applicable withholding, made on
behalf of the executive officer for the three fiscal years
preceding the fiscal year of the change in control to the ESOP,
profit sharing plan, and any other retirement plan in effect
immediately prior to the change in control;
|
|
|
|
A lump sum payment equal to three times the average annual
premium cost for group health life and long term disability
benefits provided for the three fiscal years preceding the
fiscal year of termination;
|
|
|
|
Accelerated vesting of equity awards in accordance with the
provisions contained in such plans; and
|
|
|
|
Reasonable professional outplacement services for the executive
officer until the earlier of two years following the date of
termination or the date on which the executive officer obtains
employment.
|
25
The amount of payment made to the terminated executive officer
will not exceed, and will be reduced if required in order not to
exceed the Safe Harbor amount allowable under Section 4999
of the Code.
For purposes of the Executive Retention and Severance Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
A
change-in-control
is defined as (i) a merger, consolidation or acquisition of
Granite where our shareholders do not retain a majority interest
in the surviving or acquiring corporation; (ii) the
transfer of substantially all of our assets to a corporation not
controlled by Granite or its shareholders; or (iii) the
transfer to affiliated persons of more than 30% of our voting
stock, which leads to a change of a majority of the members of
the Board of Directors; and
|
|
|
|
Good reason means (i) a material diminution in
the executives authority, duties or responsibilities,
causing the executives position to be of materially lesser
rank or responsibility within Granite or an equivalent business
unit of its parent; (ii) a decrease in the executives
base salary rate; (iii) relocation of the executives
work place that increases the regular commute distance between
the executives residence and work place by more than
30 miles (one way); or (iv) any material breach of the
Plan by Granite with respect to the executive during a Change in
Control period.
|
A
change-in-control
will also affect restricted stock earned under the Amended and
Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan. This plan provides that if
the surviving successor or acquiring corporation does not either
assume outstanding restricted stock awards or substitute new
restricted stock awards having an equivalent value, the Board of
Directors will provide that any restricted stock awards
otherwise unvested will be immediately vested in full.
Role of NEOs in
Determining Executive Compensation
All elements of the Chief Executive Officers compensation
are determined by the Compensation Committee. The Chief
Executive Officer attends Compensation Committee meetings and
recommends annual salary levels, incentive compensation and
payouts for other NEOs to the Compensation Committee for
approval.
Role of the
Compensation Consultant
Granite has retained Mercer (US) Inc. (Mercer) to
provide information, analyses and advice regarding executive
compensation. The Mercer consultant who performs these services
reports to the Vice President of Human Resources and the
Director of Compensation and Benefits. For a more complete
discussion of this relationship, see Role of the
Compensation Consultant on Page 8.
26
Compensation
Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with
management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
contained in this proxy statement. Based on such review and
discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors
that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be
included in this proxy statement and in Granites Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Members of the Compensation Committee:
|
|
|
Gary M. Cusumano, Chairman
|
|
William H. Powell
|
|
|
|
Claes G. Bjork
|
|
Rebecca A. McDonald
|
27
Summary
Compensation Table
2008
The following table summarizes the compensation for our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, three other most
highly compensated Named Executive Officers (our
NEOs) and our former Chief Financial Officer for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, December 31,
2007 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Deferred
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
Earnings(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
Total
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
(h)
|
William G. Dorey
|
|
2008
|
|
500,000
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
630,000
|
|
-
|
|
54,877
|
|
2,484,877
|
President &
|
|
2007
|
|
450,000
|
|
-
|
|
1,350,000
|
|
-
|
|
42,955
|
|
1,842,955
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
360,000
|
|
1,382,034
|
|
480,000
|
|
2,057
|
|
59,675
|
|
2,283,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeAnne M.
Stewart(5)
|
|
2008
|
|
330,000
|
|
-
|
|
198,000
|
|
-
|
|
70,159
|
|
598,159
|
Senior Vice President &
|
|
2007
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Boitano
|
|
2008
|
|
400,000
|
|
357,424
|
|
450,000
|
|
-
|
|
127,672
|
|
1,335,096
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
2007
|
|
350,000
|
|
349,305
|
|
490,000
|
|
-
|
|
57,219
|
|
1,246,524
|
& Chief Operating Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
300,000
|
|
319,116
|
|
390,000
|
|
276
|
|
57,585
|
|
1,066,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H. Roberts
|
|
2008
|
|
300,000
|
|
290,657
|
|
332,818
|
|
-
|
|
137,304
|
|
1,060,779
|
Senior Vice President &
|
|
2007
|
|
260,000
|
|
288,365
|
|
340,000
|
|
-
|
|
62,153
|
|
950,518
|
Granite West Manager
|
|
2006
|
|
240,000
|
|
263,507
|
|
300,000
|
|
155
|
|
58,598
|
|
862,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Donnino
|
|
2008
|
|
300,000
|
|
42,489
|
|
270,000
|
|
-
|
|
96,209
|
|
708,698
|
Senior Vice President &
|
|
2007
|
|
240,000
|
|
31,088
|
|
72,000
|
|
-
|
|
36,333
|
|
379,421
|
Granite East Manager
|
|
2006
|
|
240,000
|
|
76,674
|
|
35,478
|
|
418
|
|
45,460
|
|
398,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E.
Barton(5)
|
|
2008
|
|
255,000
|
|
300,000
|
|
108,000
|
|
-
|
|
47,640
|
|
710,640
|
Retired
|
|
2007
|
|
275,000
|
|
201,896
|
|
235,000
|
|
-
|
|
45,684
|
|
757,580
|
Senior Vice President &
|
|
2006
|
|
260,000
|
|
718,459
|
|
190,000
|
|
255
|
|
46,965
|
|
1,215,679
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The amounts in column (d) reflect the dollar
amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes in
accordance with FAS 123R for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 (see Note 14 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Granites Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008).
Messrs. Dorey and Barton were both 62 years of age
with 10 years of service in 2008. The stock portion of
their 2008 performance incentive was vested upon grant and was
fully expensed as of December 31, 2008. Stock awards to
Messrs. Boitano, Roberts and Donnino reflect expenses
recognized in 2008 for grants made in 2008 and earlier. No stock
awards were expensed for Ms. Stewart who was hired in 2008.
28
(2) The amounts in column (e) reflect the cash awards
earned for performance in 2008, awarded and paid in March 2009,
cash awards for performance in 2007, awarded and paid in March
2008, and performance in 2006, awarded and paid in March 2007,
respectively.
In 2008, Mr. Dorey earned $1,930,000 in incentive
compensation of which $630,000 was payable in cash and
$1,300,000 in stock which was expensed in 2008. In 2007,
Mr. Dorey earned $1,350,000 in incentive compensation of
which $450,000 was payable in cash and $900,000 was payable in
stock under the Corporate Incentive Plan. Mr. Dorey elected
to defer all of his incentive plan earnings into the Key
Management Deferred Compensation Program and did not receive any
stock. Mr. Doreys 2006 incentive compensation
reflects a cash award of $480,000 and vested stock awards of
$1,382,034 which were expensed in 2006.
In 2008, Mr. Boitano earned $1,350,000 in incentive
compensation of which $450,000 was paid in cash and $900,000 was
earned and settled in restricted shares on March 13, 2009.
Since this grant was not expensed in 2008 the FAS 123R
expense will be disclosed in next years proxy statement
under column (d). For the grant date value of those shares,
please refer to the Grants of Plan Based Awards table.
In 2008, Mr. Roberts earned $934,728 in incentive
compensation of which $332,818 was paid in cash and $601,910 was
earned and settled in restricted shares on March 13, 2009.
Since this grant was not expensed in 2008, the FAS 123R
expense will be disclosed in next years proxy statement
under column (d). For the grant date value of those shares,
please refer to the Grants of Plan Based Awards table.
In 2008, Mr. Donnino earned $760,075, of which $270,000 was
paid in cash and $490,075 was earned and settled in restricted
shares on March 13, 2009. Since this grant was not expensed
in 2008, the FAS 123R expense will be disclosed in next
years proxy statement under column (d). For the grant date
value of those shares, please refer to the Grants of Plan Based
Awards table.
(3) The amounts in column (f) reflect the above-market
earnings on deferred compensation. Above-market is any interest
above the applicable federal long-term rate that corresponds
most closely to the rate used by the plan at the time the
interest rate or formula is set.
(4) Please refer to the next table for a detailed
break-down of all other compensation.
(5) Ms. Stewarts and Mr. Bartons
salary, stock awards and non-equity incentive plan compensation
was prorated to reflect that they were not employed for the full
12 months of 2008. Ms. Stewart was hired effective
February 4, 2008, and Mr. Barton retired effective
August 15, 2008.
29
All Other
Compensation
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharing
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401K
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Match
|
|
Plan
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Contributions
|
|
Vehicle
|
|
Insurance
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
(5)
|
|
(6)
|
|
(7)
|
|
Total
|
Principal Position
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
(h)
|
|
(i)
|
William G. Dorey
President & Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
13,800
|
|
18,045
|
|
42
|
|
6,000
|
|
2,249
|
|
14,741
|
|
-
|
|
54,877
|
LeAnne M. Stewart
Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
3,000
|
|
18,045
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
11,774
|
|
5,140
|
|
32,200
|
|
70,159
|
Mark E. Boitano
Executive Vice President
& Chief Operating Officer
|
|
13,800
|
|
18,045
|
|
76,379
|
|
1,229
|
|
3,478
|
|
14,741
|
|
|
|
127,672
|
James H. Roberts
Senior Vice President &
Granite West Manager
|
|
13,800
|
|
18,045
|
|
87,069
|
|
-
|
|
1,073
|
|
17,317
|
|
-
|
|
137,304
|
Michael F. Donnino
Senior Vice President &
Granite East Manager
|
|
13,800
|
|
18,045
|
|
36,845
|
|
509
|
|
720
|
|
17,290
|
|
9,000
|
|
96,209
|
William E. Barton
Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
13,800
|
|
17,653
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
6,460
|
|
9,727
|
|
-
|
|
47,640
|
|
(1) The amounts in column (b) reflect the company
match, not to exceed 6%, on compensation deferred into the
Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plans.
(2) The amounts in column (c) reflect a discretionary
bonus of 7.846% paid on base compensation under the Profit
Sharing Bonus Program.
(3) The amounts in column (d) reflect Restricted Stock
and ESOP dividends paid to Messrs. Boitano, Roberts and
Donnino.
(4) The amounts in column (e) reflect a company
matching contribution, not to exceed 6%, on the first $100,000
contributed into the Key Management Deferred compensation Plan
II.
(5) The amounts in column (f) reflect the taxable
portion of the vehicle allowances provided to the NEOs.
Ms. Stewart and Mr. Barton are provided cash
allowances while Messrs. Dorey, Boitano, Roberts and
Donnino are provided Granite-owned vehicles.
(6) The amounts in column (g) reflect the company
expense for medical, dental, vision, life, and long-term
disability insurance.
(7) The amounts in column (h) reflect
Ms. Stewarts reimbursed relocation costs upon joining
Granite and a special allowance for financial planning services
for Mr. Donnino approved by the Compensation Committee.
30
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
2008
The following table provides additional information about stock
and option awards and equity and non-equity incentive plan
awards granted to our NEOs during the year ended
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts under
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts under
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Awards((1)(2)(4)
|
|
Awards(3)(4)
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Awards(5)
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
(h)
|
|
(i)
|
William G. Dorey
|
|
3/13/2009
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
1,506,898
|
|
|
3/14/2008
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
700,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
-
|
|
|
3/14/2008
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
450,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
900,000
|
|
-
|
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
501,147
|
LeAnne M. Stewart
|
|
3/13/2009
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
637,545
|
|
|
3/14/2008
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
240,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
600,000
|
|
-
|
Mark E. Boitano
|
|
3/13/2009
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
1,043,240
|
|
|
3/14/2008
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
500,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
900,000
|
|
-
|
|
|
3/14/2008
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
332,529
|
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
490,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
560,000
|
|
-
|
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
411,759
|
James H. Roberts
|
|
3/13/2009
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
697,730
|
|
|
3/14/2008
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
350,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
650,000
|
|
-
|
|
|
3/14/2008
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
237,512
|
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
340,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
400,000
|
|
-
|
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
367,435
|
Michael F. Donnino
|
|
3/13/2009
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
568,063
|
|
|
3/14/2008
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
300,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
600,000
|
|
-
|
|
|
3/14/2008
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
57,004
|
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
240,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
320,000
|
|
-
|
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
William E. Barton
|
|
3/13/2009
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
347,733
|
|
|
3/14/2008
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
240,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
600,000
|
|
-
|
|
|
3/14/2008
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
201,896
|
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
235,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
340,000
|
|
-
|
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
268,909
|
|
(1) Estimated future payouts reflect potential awards for
the period from January 1 to December 31, 2008.
(2) The amounts in column (c) reflect the threshold
under Granites Corporate and Division plan, as applicable.
This is zero when the RONA is less than 50% of the WACC and when
TSIR actual is greater than 130% of the TSIR target. Column
(e) is achieved when the RONA equals the WACC and TSIR
actual equals 70% of the TSIR target.
(3) The amounts in column (f) reflect the threshold
level under the Equity Component of the Corporate and Division,
plans as applicable. This is zero when the RONA is less than
100% of the WACC. Column (h) is based on the RONA exceeding
the WACC by a preset percentage to reach the maximum RONA target.
31
(4) Targets for both the Non-Equity and Equity Incentive
Awards are marked as a dash under target columns because there
are no targets. Actual award amounts are calculated based on a
straight line proration of Granites RONA compared to the
WACC.
(5) The amounts in column (i) show the fair market
value of restricted stock determined in accordance with
FAS 123R. These are restricted stock grants made to settle
the incentive award earned under column (h) for prior
years performance. The full grant date fair value is the
amount that Granite would expense in its financial statements
over the awards vesting schedule, as applicable.
For 2008 performance, the number of shares was calculated based
on the dollar value of the award earned divided by the average
of the daily closing stock price in the first 30 days in
January of the 2008 performance year. The calculated price was
$34.87. The fair value was based on the stock price on the grant
date as of March 13, 2009 which was $40.42. The number of
shares granted is shown on Pages 30 and 31 in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section.
For 2007 performance, the number of shares was calculated based
on the dollar value of the award earned divided by the average
of the daily closing stock price in the first 30 days in
January of the 2007 performance year. The calculated price was
$51.75. The fair value was based on the stock price on the grant
date as of March 14, 2008 which was $30.73.
Mr. Boitano was granted 10,821 shares, Mr. Barton
was granted 6,570 shares, Mr. Roberts was granted
7,729 shares and Mr. Donnino was granted
1,855 shares.
For 2006 performance, the number of shares was calculated based
on the dollar value of the award earned divided by the stock
price on the last trading day of the 2006 performance year. The
calculated price was $50.32. The fair value was based on the
stock price on the grant date as of March 15, 2007 which
was $57.57. Mr. Dorey was granted 8,705 shares,
Mr. Boitano was granted 6,217 shares, Mr. Barton
was granted 4,671 shares, Mr. Roberts was granted
6,382 shares and Mr. Donnino did not receive any
shares.
(6) Mr. Dorey deferred his potential March 14,
2008 restricted stock award of $526,685 into our Key Management
Deferred Compensation Plan II. The restricted value was
calculated using the plan price of $51.75 which was the average
of the daily closing stock price on the first 30 days of
January of the plan year, which equated to 17,139 shares.
The fair market value of these shares was based on the
March 14, 2008 closing stock price of $30.73. The actual
amount credited to his account reflects applicable tax
deductions.
32
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
2008
The following table summarizes equity awards made to the NEOs
that were outstanding as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: Number of
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
|
Unearned Shares, Units
|
|
Shares or Units of
|
|
|
or other Rights that Have
|
|
Stock that Have
|
|
|
Not
Vested(1)
|
|
Not
Vested(2)
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
William G. Dorey
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeAnne M. Stewart
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Boitano
|
|
27,134
|
|
1,191,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H. Roberts
|
|
39,855
|
|
1,750,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Donnino
|
|
5,575
|
|
244,910
|
William E. Barton (Retired)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(1) In 2006, Messrs. Dorey and Barton became fully
vested in all stock awards under Granites vesting program,
whereby stock is 100% vested when the holder reaches age 62
with 10 years of service. Messrs. Dorey and
Bartons amounts that vested in 2008 are reflected in the
Stock Vested table in columns (b) and (c).
(2) The amounts shown in column (c) reflect the
December 31, 2008 stock price of $43.93.
33
Stock Vested
2008
The following table reflects the number of shares our NEOs
acquired upon the vesting of stock awards during 2008 and the
value realized before payment of applicable withholding tax and
broker commissions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
Vesting(1)
|
|
upon
Vesting(2)
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
William G. Dorey
|
|
37,281
|
|
1,506,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeAnne M. Stewart
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Boitano
|
|
9,792
|
|
324,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H. Roberts
|
|
14,805
|
|
446,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Donnino
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Barton
|
|
8,603
|
|
347,733
|
|
(1) In 2006, Messrs. Dorey and Barton turned
age 62 with 10 years service. Under the Granite
vesting program all of their outstanding stock awards became
100% vested. With respect to performance awards for 2008,
Mr. Dorey earned 37,281 shares and Mr. Barton
earned 8,603 shares based on a plan grant price of $34.87.
This is the average of the daily closing stock price in the
first 30 days of January of the 2008 performance year.
Mr. Doreys and Mr. Bartons stock awards
were 100% vested in 2008.
(2) The amounts in column (c) reflect the fair value
on the day of vesting.
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
2008
The following table summarizes our NEOs compensation under
our nonqualified deferred compensation plans for the year ended
December 31, 2008 which is also reflected in the Summary
Compensation Table above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Earnings in Last
|
|
Aggregate Balance at
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Last Fiscal Year End
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William G. Dorey
|
|
333,087
|
|
6,000
|
|
194,829
|
|
4,837,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeAnne M. Stewart
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Boitano
|
|
79,484
|
|
1,229
|
|
25,417
|
|
508,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H. Roberts
|
|
15,339
|
|
-
|
|
14,326
|
|
279,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Donnino
|
|
51,991
|
|
509
|
|
35,523
|
|
694,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Barton
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
19,575
|
|
321,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) NEOs could defer compensation under the Granite
Construction Key Management Deferred Compensation Plan II
which allows key executives to defer incentive compensation and
employee stock ownership (ESOP) dividends. We provide a matching
contribution of 6% on the first $100,000 of employee deferral.
Participants are required to make an election each plan year
with respect to the amount to be deferred, date, and form of
distribution. A distribution election is irrevocable on the
first day of each plan year. Amounts in column (b) in the
above table are included in the Summary Compensation Table.
Mr. Dorey deferred a portion of his non equity incentive
compensation, profit sharing cash bonus and ESOP dividends in to
the Key Management Deferred Compensation Plan II.
Messrs. Boitano and Donnino deferred their profit sharing
cash bonus and ESOP dividends while Mr. Roberts deferred
his profit sharing cash bonus into the Key Management Deferred
Compensation Plan II. Due to timing difference of the matching
contribution, amounts in column (c) may not equal 6% of the
executive contribution in column (b).
(2) The Key Management Deferred Compensation Plan II
allows NEOs who are 62 years of age and have 10 years
of service on the last day of the performance period, to defer
receipt of 100% of the restricted stock payable under the
performance unit agreement. A quarterly dividend equivalent is
credited to NEOs who defer performance units into the Key
Management Deferred Compensation Plan II. For the performance
period ended December 31, 2008 there was no deferral of
restricted stock payable under the performance unit agreement.
Mr. Doreys aggregate balance of $3,756,791 reflects
the cash value of $2,997,240 in incentive compensation deferrals
and 17,290.25 performance units valued at $759,551, based on a
closing stock price of $43.93 on December 31, 2008.
Messrs. Boitano, Roberts, Donnino and Barton have no
performance unit deferrals into the Key Management Deferred
Compensation Plan II.
35
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Except in the case of a change in control of Granite, we are not
obligated to pay severance or other enhanced benefits to any of
the NEOs, except Ms. Stewart, upon termination of their
employment. Severance benefits payable to Ms. Stewart upon
the termination of her employment other than for cause are
described under Severance Arrangement above. No
severance payments were made to Mr. Barton upon his
retirement from Granite in 2008.
The following table describes an example of the potential
payments and benefits under Granites compensation and
benefit plans and arrangements to which the NEOs would be
entitled upon termination of employment within three years
following a change in control of Granite. This example assumes
the event occurred on the last business day of the last
completed fiscal year, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Insurance
|
|
Other
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Payment(1)
|
|
Benefits(2)
|
|
Compensation(3)
|
|
Awards(4)
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William G. Dorey
|
|
5,698,034
|
|
48,367
|
|
97,977
|
|
-
|
|
5,844,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeAnne M. Stewart
|
|
1,408,000
|
|
48,367
|
|
21,045
|
|
-
|
|
1,477,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Boitano
|
|
4,381,044
|
|
48,367
|
|
97,977
|
|
1,191,997
|
|
5,719,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H. Roberts
|
|
3,195,891
|
|
48,367
|
|
97,977
|
|
1,750,830
|
|
5,093,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Donnino
|
|
1,863,553
|
|
48,367
|
|
90,371
|
|
244,910
|
|
2,247,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The amounts in column (b) reflect a lump sum
payment equal to the average of the aggregate annual incentive
bonuses earned for the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal
year of the change in control and a lump sum payment equal to
three times the annual base salary rate in effect immediately
prior to the termination.
(2) The amounts in column (c) reflect the lump
sum equal to the average cost to Granite of the executive
officers group insurance benefits, such as life, health
and long-term disability, for the three fiscal years ending
before the date of termination.
(3) The amounts in column (d) reflect a lump sum
payment equal to the average cash equivalent of contributions
which would have been made on behalf of the officer for the
three fiscal years ending before the date of termination to the
ESOP, profit sharing plan, or other retirement plan provided by
Granite and in effect as of the date of termination. This amount
does not include additional amounts that may be payable for
reasonable professional outplacement services for the executive
officer.
(4) In the event of a change in control, if the
acquiring corporation elects not to assume or substitute
outstanding equity awards, all non-exercisable, unvested or
unpaid portions of these outstanding equity awards would become
immediately exercisable and fully vested. If the executive
officers service is terminated within 12 months
following a change in control, the exercisability, vesting, and
payment of the outstanding awards are accelerated effective
immediately as of the date of termination. The amounts in
36
column (e) reflect the outstanding equity awards valued at
the December 31, 2008 stock value of $43.93. In 2007,
Mr. Doreys outstanding stock awards were 100% vested
under the Granite vesting program as he qualified for
accelerated vesting as he was age 62 with 10 years of
service.
Director
Compensation
Cash
Compensation
Non-employee directors receive annual retainers which were paid
in quarterly installments. All non-employee directors are paid a
retainer of $70,000 for board membership. Non-employee directors
on the Audit/Compliance Committee, Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee, and Compensation Committee receive an
additional retainer of $5,000 for each committee on which they
served. Strategic Planning and Executive Committee members are
paid retainers of $3,000 for participation on each of these
committees. The Chairman of the Audit/Compliance Committee
receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000. The Chair of
the Compensation Committee receives an additional retainer of
$12,000 while the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Chair receives an added retainer of $10,000. The Strategic
Planning Committee Chair is paid an additional retainer of
$8,000. No additional fees are paid for attendance at meetings
whether in person or telephonically.
Equity
Compensation
Each non-employee director, other than the Presiding Director,
receives an annual grant of 1,000 shares of restricted
stock. The Presiding Director receives an annual grant of
1,150 shares of restricted stock. Non-employee director
restricted stock awards vest in full at the end of the
directors term. Restricted stock was granted July 1,
2008 at a fair market value of $32.30. The Chairman of the Board
received an annual grant of 3,000 shares of restricted
stock with a grant value of $34.26 on July 24, 2008.
37
Director
Compensation Table
2008
The following table presents the compensation provided by
Granite to our directors for the year ended December 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
Unit
|
|
Option
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in
Cash(1)
|
|
Award(2)
|
|
Award(2)
|
|
Compensation(3)
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claes G. Bjork
|
|
78,000
|
|
29,519
|
|
-
|
|
560
|
|
108,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Bradford, Jr.
|
|
86,000
|
|
53,154
|
|
-
|
|
650
|
|
139,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary M. Cusumano
|
|
83,000
|
|
36,293
|
|
-
|
|
390
|
|
119,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David H. Kelsey
|
|
90,000
|
|
53,154
|
|
-
|
|
650
|
|
143,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rebecca A. McDonald
|
|
96,091
|
|
32,629
|
|
-
|
|
728
|
|
129,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Fernando Niebla
|
|
83,000
|
|
36,293
|
|
-
|
|
390
|
|
119,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Powell
|
|
94,909
|
|
30,836
|
|
-
|
|
670
|
|
126,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David H.
Watts(4)
|
|
-
|
|
15,573
|
|
-
|
|
287,790
|
|
303,363
|
|
(1) The amount in column (b) reflects the annual cash
retainer paid to non-employee directors for the year ended
December 31, 2008. In 2008 each non-employee director was
paid an annual retainer as a member of the board and additional
retainers for participation as a member and Chair of a Board
committee. The cash retainer was paid quarterly in equal
payments. No meeting fees were paid. In 2008 each non-employee
director received an equity grant of 1000 shares of
restricted stock. The Presiding Director received an additional
15% stock equity grant totaling 1150 restricted shares. The
restricted stock qualifies for quarterly dividend payments.
(2) The amounts in column (c) reflect the dollar
amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for
equity awards granted in the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 in accordance with FAS 123R. The vesting amounts vary
based on the directors term. On July 1, 2008,
Messrs. Bjork, Bradford, Cusumano, Kelsey and Niebla and
Ms. McDonald received a grant of 1,000 shares of
restricted stock with a grant value of $32.20. Mr. Powell,
as Presiding Director, received a grant of 1,150 shares of
restricted stock with a grant value of $32.20. As of the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008, Mr. Powell and
Ms. McDonald had an aggregate balance of 2,150 unvested
shares, Messrs. Bjork, Bradford and Kelsey had an unvested
balance of 2,000 shares and Messrs. Cusumano and
Niebla had an aggregate unvested balance of 1,000 shares.
(3) Column (e) includes dividends on restricted stock
issued on July 1, 2008.
(4) Mr. Watts, Chairman of the Board, is a
non-executive employee of Granite. During 2008, Mr. Watts
received a salary of $270,000 and a grant of 3,000 shares
of restricted stock with a grant value of $34.26 on
July 24, 2008. Mr. Watts was provided medical, dental,
vision, life, long-term disability insurance, and a company
vehicle valued at $17,399.88. He received quarterly dividend
payments of $390.
38
Stock Ownership
of Beneficial Owners and Certain Management
The following table provides information concerning the
ownership of our common stock by all directors and nominees, our
Chief Executive Officer and our other NEOs, our former Chief
Financial Officer, our directors and executive officers as a
group, and owners of 5% or more of the outstanding common stock
on March 20, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
of Beneficial
|
|
Common Stock
|
Name
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
Outstanding(2)
|
Emben & Co. (ESOP Trust)
c/o BNY
Western Trust Company
One Wall Street
New York, NY 10286
|
|
4,405,904
|
|
11.39
|
Advisory Research,
Inc.(3)
180 North Stetson Street, Suite 5500
Chicago, IL 60601
|
|
2,508,145
|
|
6.56
|
Barclays Global Investors,
NA(4)
400 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
|
|
2,011,364
|
|
5.26
|
David H.
Watts(5)
|
|
3,874
|
|
*
|
Claes G.
Bjork(6)
|
|
20,216
|
|
*
|
James W. Bradford,
Jr.(7)
|
|
6,884
|
|
*
|
Gary M.
Cusumano(8)
|
|
6,334
|
|
*
|
David H.
Kelsey(9)
|
|
11,509
|
|
*
|
Rebecca A.
McDonald(10)
|
|
16,563
|
|
*
|
J. Fernando
Niebla(11)
|
|
16,312
|
|
*
|
William H.
Powell(12)
|
|
21,945
|
|
*
|
William G.
Dorey(13)
|
|
223,202
|
|
*
|
LeAnne M.
Stewart(14)
|
|
16,773
|
|
*
|
Mark E.
Boitano(15)
|
|
70,131
|
|
*
|
Michael F.
Donnino(16)
|
|
87,317
|
|
*
|
James H.
Roberts(17)
|
|
181,661
|
|
*
|
William E.
Barton(18)
|
|
89,857
|
|
*
|
All Executive Officers and Directors
|
|
|
|
|
As a Group (14 Persons)
(5-18)
|
|
772,578
|
|
2%
|
|
* Less than 1%.
(1) Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the
persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power
with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially
owned by them, subject to community property laws where
applicable.
(2) Calculated on the basis of 38,677,755 shares of
common stock outstanding as of March 20, 2009, except that
shares of common stock underlying options exercisable within
60 days of March 20, 2009 are deemed outstanding for
purposes of calculating the beneficial ownership of common stock
of the holders of such options.
39
(3) Share ownership is as of December 31, 2008. Based
upon a Schedule 13G filed by Advisory Research, Inc.
(Advisory Research) with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Advisory Research has sole voting power and sole
dispositive power with respect to all 2,508,145 shares.
(4) Share ownership is as of December 31, 2008. Based
upon a Schedule 13G filed by Barclays Global Investors, NA
(Barclays) with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Barclays has sole voting power with respect to
1,690,747 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to
all 2,011,364 shares.
(5) Includes 223 shares of common stock owned by the
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) but allocated
to Mr. Watts account as of March 20, 2009, over
which Mr. Watts has voting but not dispositive power.
Mr. Watts became eligible to withdraw his ESOP shares when
he turned
591/2
and had completed 10 years of vesting service. He can elect
to make a withdrawal once during each plan year. Also includes
3,000 shares granted to Mr. Watts on July 24,
2008 under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan
which Mr. Watts will have the right to acquire in May 2011
as a result of shares vesting, and 651 shares that
Mr. Watts holds in trust for the benefit of family members,
as to which Mr. Watts and his wife share voting and
investment power.
(6) Includes 8,216 shares of common stock which
Mr. Bjork has the right to acquire as of March 20,
2009 as a result of options vested and exercisable on the day of
grant under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan,
2,000 shares of common stock granted to Mr. Bjork
under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan which
Mr. Bjork will have the right to acquire in May 2010 as a
result of the shares vesting, and 10,000 shares of common
stock held in Mr. Bjorks name.
(7) Includes 3,163 shares of common stock which
Mr. Bradford has the right to acquire as of March 20,
2009 as a result of options vested and exercisable on the day of
grant under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan,
721 shares of common stock units and dividends granted to
Mr. Bradford under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan, 2,000 shares of common stock granted to
Mr. Bradford under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan which Mr. Bradford will have the right to
acquire on May 15, 2009 as a result of the shares vesting,
and 1,000 shares of common stock that Mr. Bradford
holds jointly with his wife.
(8) Includes 1,268 shares of common stock which
Mr. Cusumano has the right to acquire as of March 20,
2009 as a result of options vested and exercisable on the day of
grant under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan,
1,595 shares of common stock units and dividends granted to
Mr. Cusumano under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan, 1,000 shares of common stock granted to
Mr. Cusumano under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan which Mr. Cusumano will have the right to
acquire in May 2011 as a result of the shares vesting,
1,000 shares of common stock that he holds in his name, and
1,471 shares of common stock that Mr. Cusumano holds
in trust for the benefit of his family as to which shares
Mr. Cusumano and his wife share voting and investment power.
(9) Includes 5,973 shares of common stock which
Mr. Kelsey has the right to acquire as of March 20,
2009 as a result of options vested and exercisable on the day of
grant under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan,
1,688 shares of common stock units and dividends granted to
Mr. Kelsey under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan, 2,000 shares of common stock granted to
Mr. Kelsey under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan which Mr. Kelsey will have the right to
acquire on May 15, 2009 as a result of the shares vesting,
and 1,848 shares of common stock that Mr. Kelsey holds
jointly with his wife.
40
(10) Includes 8,613 shares of common stock which
Ms. McDonald has the right to acquire as of March 20,
2009 as a result of options vested and exercisable on the day of
grant under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan,
4,675 shares of common stock units and dividends granted to
Ms. McDonald under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan, 2,150 shares of common stock granted to
Ms. McDonald under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan which Ms. McDonald will have the right to
acquire in May 2010 as a result of the shares vesting, and
1,125 shares of common stock held in
Ms. McDonalds name.
(11) Includes 11,434 shares of common stock which
Mr. Niebla has the right to acquire as of March 20,
2009 as a result of options vested and exercisable on the day of
grant under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan,
2,878 shares of common stock units and dividends granted to
Mr. Niebla under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan, 1,000 shares that Mr. Niebla holds in
his name, and 1,000 shares of common stock granted to
Mr. Niebla under the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan which Mr. Niebla will have the right to
acquire in May 2011 as a result of the shares vesting.
(12) Includes 3,638 shares of common stock units and
dividends granted to Mr. Powell under the Amended and
Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, 2,150 shares of common
stock granted to Mr. Powell under the Amended and Restated
1999 Equity Incentive Plan which Mr. Powell will have the
right to acquire in May 2010 as a result of the shares vesting,
and 16,157 shares of common stock that Mr. Powell
holds jointly with his wife.
(13) Includes 80 shares of common stock owned by the
ESOP but allocated to Mr. Doreys account as of
March 20, 2009, over which Mr. Dorey has voting but
not dispositive power, 23,954 shares of common stock held
in Mr. Doreys name, and 199,248 shares of common
stock that Mr. Dorey holds in trust for the benefit of his
family as to which shares Mr. Dorey and his wife share
voting and investment power. Mr. Dorey became eligible to
withdraw his ESOP shares when he turned
591/2
and had completed 10 years of vesting service. He can elect
to make a withdrawal once during each plan year.
(14) Includes 15,773 shares of restricted stock over
which Ms. Stewart has voting, but not dispositive power as
of March 20, 2009, and 1,000 shares of common stock
held in Ms. Stewarts name.
(15) Includes 45,246 shares of restricted stock over
which Mr. Boitano has voting, but not dispositive power, as
of March 20, 2009, 4,948 shares of common stock held
in Mr. Boitanos name, and 19,937 shares of
common stock that Mr. Boitano holds in a trust for the
benefit of his family as to which shares Mr. Boitano and
his wife share voting and investment power.
(16) Includes approximately 65,281 shares of common
stock owned by the ESOP but allocated to Mr. Donninos
account as of March 20, 2009, 19,629 shares of
restricted stock over which Mr. Donnino has voting, but not
dispositive power, as of March 20, 2009, and
2,407 shares of common stock held in
Mr. Donninos name. Mr. Donnino becomes eligible
to make withdrawals of his ESOP shares when he turns
591/2
and has completed 10 years of vesting service, at which
time he can elect to withdraw from his account once during each
plan year.
(17) Includes approximately 127,585 shares of common
stock owned by the ESOP but allocated to Mr. Roberts
account as of March 20, 2009, 5,183 shares of common
stock held in Mr. Roberts name, and
48,893 shares of restricted stock over which
Mr. Roberts has voting, but not dispositive power, as of
March 20, 2009. Mr. Roberts becomes eligible to make
withdrawals of his ESOP shares when he turns
591/2
41
and has completed 10 years of vesting service, at which
time he can elect to withdraw from his account once during each
plan year.
(18) Common stock owned by Mr. Barton as of his
retirement in August 2008. Includes 69,102 shares of common
stock owned by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(ESOP) but allocated to Mr. Bartons
account, over which Mr. Barton has voting but not
dispositive power, and 20,755 shares of common stock held
in Mr. Bartons name. Mr. Barton became eligible
to withdraw his ESOP shares when he turned
591/2
and had completed 10 years of vesting service.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our
executive officers, directors and any persons who beneficially
own more than 10% of our common stock to report ownership of and
transactions in Granite stock with the SEC. For practical
purposes, we assist our directors and officers by monitoring
transactions and completing and filing the reports on their
behalf. Based on our review of these forms and written
representations from our executive officers and directors, we
believe that all filing requirements applicable to them were
complied with except that, due to an in-house administrative
error, Mr. Boitanos Form 4 for December 31,
2008 was filed one day late.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table contains information as of December 31,
2008 regarding stock authorized for issuance under the Granite
Construction Incorporated Amended and Restated 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
remaining available for
|
|
|
|
Number of shares to
|
|
|
average exercise
|
|
|
future issuance under
|
|
|
|
be issued upon
|
|
|
price of
|
|
|
equity compensation
|
|
|
|
exercise of
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
plans (excluding stock
|
|
|
|
outstanding options
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
reflected in column (a))
|
|
Plan category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by shareholders
|
|
|
45,033
|
|
|
$
|
27.04
|
|
|
|
2,020,008
|
|
Total
|
|
|
45,033
|
|
|
$
|
27.04
|
|
|
|
2,020,008
|
|
|
Transactions with
Related Persons
Granites legal staff is primarily responsible for the
development and implementation of processes and controls to
obtain information from the directors and executive officers
with respect to related person transactions. They also
determine, based on the facts and circumstances, whether the
Company or a related person has a direct or indirect interest in
the transaction. In addition, the Board of Directors has adopted
a written policy and procedures for review and approval of
related party transactions involving Granite. The policy
requires the Audit/Compliance Committees review and
approval or ratification of any related party transaction in
which Granite is a participant. This includes, among other
things, any related party transaction
42
that would be required to be disclosed under the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Under the policy, the Audit/Compliance Committee reviews the
material facts of all related party transactions that require
the Committees approval and either approves or disapproves
of the entry into the related party transaction. If advance
Committee approval of a related party transaction is not
feasible, the transaction must be entered into subject to the
Committees later approval. Thereafter, the Committee will
consider the transaction, and, if the Committee determines it to
be appropriate, ratify it at the next regularly scheduled
meeting of the Committee. In determining whether to approve or
ratify a related party transaction, the Committee takes into
account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the
related party transaction is on terms no less favorable than
terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under
the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related
persons interest in the transaction. No director who is
deemed a related party under the policy with respect to the
transaction under consideration may participate in the approval
process. All related party transactions approved by the
Committee must be disclosed to the full Board of Directors.
Currently Granite is not a party to any related party
transactions.
Report of the
Audit/Compliance Committee
The Audit/Compliance Committee is appointed by the Board of
Directors and reports to the Board at each meeting. Its purpose
is to (a) assist the Board in its oversight of
(1) Granites accounting and financial reporting
principles and policies, and internal and disclosure controls
and procedures, including the internal audit function,
(2) Granites system of internal control over
financial reporting as required by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (3) the integrity of
Granites financial statements, (4) the qualifications
and independence of Granites independent registered public
accounting firm, (5) Granites compliance with legal
and regulatory requirements, and (6) Granites
Corporate Compliance Program and Code of Conduct; and
(b) serve as the Qualified Legal Compliance Committee of
the Board of Directors as required. The Committee is solely
responsible for selecting, evaluating, setting the compensation
of, and, where deemed appropriate, replacing the independent
registered public accounting firm (or nominating an independent
registered public accounting firm to be proposed for shareholder
approval in any proxy statement).
Management has the primary responsibility for the financial
statements and the reporting process, including the systems of
internal controls and the effectiveness of the internal control
over financial reporting. In fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities, the Committee reviewed and discussed with
management the audited financial statements in the Annual Report
on
Form 10-K,
including a discussion of the quality, not just the
acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness
of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the
financial statements.
The Committee also oversees our Ethics and Compliance Program,
participates in the annual evaluation of our Corporate
Compliance Officer and the Director of Internal Audit, and
provides a detailed annual report to the Board on the progress
of the program and plans for future activities.
The Director of Internal Audit reports directly to the Chairman
of the Committee and has direct access and meets regularly with
the Committee to discuss the results of internal audits and the
quality of internal controls. The Corporate Compliance Officer
also reports directly to the Committee.
43
The Committee reviewed and discussed with the independent
registered public accounting firm, who is responsible for
expressing an opinion on the conformity of Granites
audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting
principles, its judgments as to the quality, not just the
acceptability, of Granites accounting principles and such
other matters as are required to be discussed with the Committee
under generally accepted auditing standards, including Statement
on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA,
Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU Section 380, as adopted
by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in
Rule 3200T). In addition, the Committee has discussed with
the independent registered public accounting firm the
auditors independence from Granite and its management,
including the matters in the written disclosures and the letter
from the independent registered public accounting firm required
by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526.
The Committee discussed with the independent registered public
accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their audit. The
Committee meets with the independent registered public
accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss
the results of their examination, their evaluation of
Granites internal controls, including internal control
over financial reporting, and the overall quality of
Granites financial reporting. In addition, the Committee
reviewed with management and the independent registered public
accounting firm drafts of Granites quarterly and annual
financial statements and press releases prior to the public
release of the quarterly earnings. In addition to the quarterly
review, the Committee met with the Chief Executive Officer and
the Chief Financial Officer to discuss the process adopted by
management to enable them to sign the certifications that are
required to accompany reports filed with the SEC.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the
Committee recommended to Granites Board of Directors that
Granites audited financial statements be included in
Granites Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
Aggregate fees for professional services rendered for us by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended December 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$1,943,275
|
|
$1,687,625
|
Audit Related Fees
|
|
0
|
|
139,500
|
Tax Fees
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
All Other Fees
|
|
4,000
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$1,947,275
|
|
$1,828,625
|
|
Audit Fees were for professional services rendered for
the audits of Granites consolidated financial statements
including audits of internal control over financial reporting,
audits of subsidiary financial statements, and quarterly
financial reviews.
Audit Related Fees were for services rendered in
connection with assistance with acquisition-related due
diligence.
All Other Fees include an amount paid for a benchmarking
study in 2008, and a software license in 2007 and 2008.
44
Audit Committee
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Committees policy is to pre-approve all audit and
permissible non-audit services provided by the independent
registered public accounting firm. During 2008, no services were
provided to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP or any other
accounting firm other than in accordance with the pre-approval
policies and procedures described above.
Based on its review of the non-audit services provided by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the committee believes that
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPs provision of such non-audit
services is compatible with maintaining their independence.
Members of the Audit/Compliance Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
David H. Kelsey, Chair
|
|
|
J. Fernando Niebla
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Bradford, Jr.
|
|
|
Rebecca A. McDonald
|
|
Proposal to Amend
the
Granite Construction Incorporated
Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan
Our Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the
Plan) was originally adopted by the Board of
Directors in March 1999 and was approved by our shareholders at
our annual meeting held on May 24, 2004. A further
amendment to the Plan was approved by our shareholders at our
annual meeting held on May 19, 2008. The Plan currently
authorizes Granite to issue up to 4,250,000 shares of
common stock to employees and directors, of which
1,654,077 shares remain available as of March 20, 2009
for the grant of new incentive awards. So that we may continue
to offer a competitive equity incentive program and preserve our
ability to deduct in full for federal income tax purposes
compensation certain of our executive officers may recognize in
connection with performance-based awards granted under the Plan,
the shareholders are being asked to approve certain material
terms of the Plan related to such awards.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), generally denies a corporate tax
deduction for annual compensation exceeding $1 million paid
to the chief executive officer or to any of the three other most
highly compensated officers of a publicly-held company. However,
certain types of compensation, including performance-based
compensation, are generally excluded from this limit.
Since the Plan was approved by the shareholders in 2004, we have
granted performance units to our executive officers which
provide for payments in cash and stock only upon the achievement
of certain performance goals. This program has been instrumental
in aligning the goals of the executives with the goals of our
business plan. Recently, we have decided to shift the focus of
our performance unit program by incorporating a new performance
measure, total shareholder return, that fits with our evolving
business plan, where total shareholder return is a function of
change in stock price plus stock dividends paid. Granite is
faced with significant financial challenges as it attempts to
meet high growth, profit expectations and continually increasing
capital investment demands essential to grow the business and
maintain the current levels of operations (for example,
replacement costs for aggregate reserves). Basing long-term
incentive compensation on economic profit growth and total
shareholder return ensures that capital is invested
appropriately for the long term rather than focusing principally
on short-term results to increase revenue and earnings. We
believe it is necessary to amend the Plan to incorporate total
shareholder return as an additional performance measure into the
Plan in order to better motivate the participants to meet
performance goals related to our current business plan and to
enable compensation in connection with awards granted under the
Plan to qualify as performance based within the
meaning of Code Section 162(m) so that it is deductible by
Granite for federal income tax purposes.
45
Therefore, the shareholders are being asked to approve an
amendment to the Plan that will add total shareholder return as
another performance criterion upon which awards of performance
shares, performance units and certain awards of restricted stock
and restricted stock units may be based.
The following provisions of the Plan are not being
amended:
the eligibility requirements for participation
in the Plan;
the maximum numbers of shares for which stock
options, performance shares and awards of restricted stock or
restricted stock units based on attainment of performance goals
that may be granted to an employee in any fiscal year; and
any other provision of the Plan.
While we believe that compensation in connection with such
awards under the Plan generally will be deductible by Granite
for federal income tax purposes, under certain circumstances,
such as a change in control of Granite, compensation paid in
settlement of certain performance awards may not qualify as
performance-based.
Material Terms of
the Amendment
The following summary of the amendment to the Plan is qualified
in its entirety by the specific language of the Plan, a copy of
which is available to any shareholder upon request. As defined
in the tax rules, shareholders must approve each of the material
terms of performance goals if the Company is to obtain tax
deductions for the specified forms of performance-based
compensation for executives whose total annual compensation
exceeds $1 million, including (i) the employees
eligible to receive compensation, (ii) the description of
the business measurements on which the performance goals are
based, and (iii) the formula used to calculate the maximum
amount of compensation that can be paid to an employee under the
arrangement. As discussed above, the employees eligible to
receive compensation has not changed. The remaining material
terms of the performance-based awards are described below.
Certain Award
Limits
This amendment is not intended to change the following current
Plan provisions. To enable compensation in connection with
certain types of awards to qualify as
performance-based within the meaning of
Section 162(m) of the Code, the Plan establishes a limit on
the maximum aggregate number of shares or dollar limit for which
any such award may be granted to an employee in any fiscal year.
Performance
Awards
This amendment is not intended to change the following current
Plan provisions. The Compensation Committee may grant
performance awards subject to such conditions and the attainment
of such performance goals over such periods as the Compensation
Committee determines in writing and sets forth in a written
agreement between Granite and the participant. These awards may
be designated as restricted stock, restricted stock units,
performance shares or performance units. Restricted stock awards
are grants of stock.
46
Restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units
are unfunded bookkeeping entries. Performance shares and
performance units generally having initial values, respectively,
equal to the fair market value determined on the grant date of a
share of common stock and $100 per unit. Performance awards will
specify a predetermined amount of restricted stock, restricted
stock units, performance shares or performance units that may be
earned by the participant to the extent that one or more
predetermined performance goals are attained within a
predetermined performance period. To the extent earned, we may
settle performance awards in cash, shares of common stock
(including shares of restricted stock) or any combination
thereof.
Prior to the beginning of the applicable performance period or
such later date as permitted under Section 162(m) of the
Code, the Compensation Committee will establish one or more
performance goals applicable to the award. Performance goals
will be based on the attainment of specified target levels with
respect to one or more measures of business or financial
performance of Granite and each parent and subsidiary
corporation consolidated with Granite for financial reporting
purposes, or such division or business unit of Granite as may be
selected by the Compensation Committee.
Performance
Measures
Under the current Plan, the Compensation Committee, in its
discretion, may base performance goals on one or more of the
following performance measures: (a) revenue,
(b) operating income, (c) pre-tax profit, (d) net
income, (e) gross margin, (f) operating margin,
(g) earnings per share, (h) return on shareholder
equity, (i) return on capital, (j) return on net
assets, (k) economic value added, (l) cash flow,
(m) net operating profits after taxes, (n) net asset
value, (o) cost of capital and weighted average cost of
capital, (p) economic profit, (q) return on assets,
(r) earnings before income tax and depreciation (EBITDA),
(s) earnings before income tax (EBIT), (t) return on
equity, (u) operating income and adjusted operating income,
(v) gross income, (w) return on invested capital,
(x) overhead, (y) net operating assets, and
(z) safety incident rate (including total injury incident
rate, OSHA recordable injury rate and lost time injury rate).
This amendment to the Plan would modify the list of performance
measures such that the Compensation Committee, in its
discretion, may, in addition to those items listed above, base
performance goals on (aa) total shareholder return.
This amendment does not seek to change other provisions
of the current Plan which provide that:
The target levels with respect to these
performance measures may be expressed on an absolute basis or
relative to a standard specified by the Compensation Committee.
The degree of attainment of performance measures will, according
to criteria established by the Compensation Committee, be
computed before the effect of changes in accounting standards,
restructuring charges and similar extraordinary items occurring
after the establishment of the performance goals applicable to a
performance award.
Following completion of the applicable
performance period, the Compensation Committee will certify in
writing the extent to which the applicable performance goals
have been attained and the resulting value to be paid to the
participant. The Compensation Committee retains the discretion
to eliminate or reduce, but not increase, the amount that would
otherwise be payable to the participant on the basis of the
performance goals attained. However, no such reduction may
increase the amount paid to any other participant. In its
discretion, the Compensation Committee may provide for the
payment to a participant awarded performance shares of dividend
equivalents with respect to cash dividends paid on our common
stock. Performance award payments may be made in lump sum or in
installments. If any payment is to be
47
made on a deferred basis, the Compensation Committee may provide
for the payment of dividend equivalents or interest during the
deferral period.
Unless otherwise provided by the Compensation
Committee, if a participants service terminates due to the
participants death, disability or retirement prior to
completion of the applicable performance period, the final award
value will be determined at the end of the performance period on
the basis of the performance goals attained during the entire
performance period but will be prorated for the number of months
of the participants service during the performance period.
If a participants service terminates prior to completion
of the applicable performance period for any other reason, the
Plan provides that, unless otherwise determined by the
Compensation Committee, the performance award will be forfeited.
No performance award may be sold or transferred other than by
will or the laws of descent and distribution prior to the end of
the applicable performance period.
Vote Required and
Board of Directors Recommendation
Approval of this proposal requires a number of votes
For the proposal that represents a majority of the
shares present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at
the annual meeting, with abstentions and broker non-votes each
being counted as present for purposes of determining the
presence of a quorum, abstentions having the same effect as a
negative vote and broker non-votes having no effect on the
outcome of the vote.
The Board of Directors believes that approval of the amendment
to the Plan is in the best interests of Granite and its
shareholders for the reasons stated above.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote
FOR this proposal to amend the Granite Construction
Incorporated Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan.
Ratification of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit/Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors has
appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as Granites
independent registered public accounting firm to perform the
audit of our financial statements for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2009. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and its
predecessor, Coopers & Lybrand, have been our auditors
since 1982.
A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present
at the annual meeting. He or she will be given the opportunity
to make a statement if he or she desires and will be available
to respond to appropriate shareholder questions.
Although ratification is not required by Granites bylaws
or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to our shareholders for ratification
as a matter of good corporate practice. The majority vote
present at the annual meeting is required for approval of this
proposal. If shareholders do not ratify the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Granites independent
registered public accounting firm, the Audit/Compliance
Committee will reconsider the appointment. Even if the selection
is ratified, the Audit/Compliance Committee, in its discretion,
may select a different independent registered public accounting
firm at any time during the year it if determines that such a
change would be in the best interest of Granite and our
shareholders.
The Board of
Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR this
proposal.
48
Shareholder
Proposals to Be Presented
at the 2010 Annual Meeting
Under Granites bylaws, director nominations and proposals
for other business to be presented at the annual shareholder
meeting by a shareholder may be made only if that shareholder is
entitled to vote at the meeting, gave the required notice, and
was a shareholder of record at the time when he or she gave the
required notice. In addition, matters other than nominations for
election to the Board must conform to statutory requirements
under the Delaware General Corporation Law.
The required notice must be in writing, must contain the
information specified in our bylaws, and must be received at our
principal executive offices not less than 120 days prior to
the first anniversary of the date the proxy statement for the
preceding years annual meeting of shareholders was
released to shareholders. If no meeting was held in the previous
year, the date of the annual meeting is changed by more than 30
calendar days from the previous year, or in the event of a
special meeting, to be on time, the notice must be delivered by
the close of business on the tenth day following the day on
which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public
announcement of the date of the meeting was made.
Separate from the notice, SEC rules entitle a shareholder to
require us to include certain shareholder proposals in
Granites proxy materials. However, those rules do not
require us to include a nomination for election to the Board (or
any other office) or set limits on the content of a shareholder
proposal. We are also not required to include eligibility,
timeliness, and other requirements (including a requirement that
before a shareholder can submit his or her proposal, he or she
must have continuously held at least $2,000 in market value or
1% of our common stock for at least one year).
Pursuant to Granites bylaws and the SEC rules, to be
considered for inclusion in Granites proxy statement for
presentation at our 2010 annual shareholder meeting, all
shareholder proposals must be received by our Secretary at
Granites principal executive offices on or before the
close of business on Wednesday, December 2, 2009.
Other
Matters
As of the date of this proxy statement, the only matters that
management intends to present or knows that others will present
at the meeting have been included in this proxy statement. If
any other matters are properly presented at the meeting, or any
adjournment, the persons named in the proxy card will vote the
represented shares using their best judgment.
|
|
|
Dated: April 3, 2009
|
|
Michael Futch
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
49
REVOCABLE PROXY
Granite Construction Incorporated
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
May 15, 2009 10:30 a.m.
SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints William G. Dorey and LeAnne M. Stewart and each of them with full
power of substitution to represent and to vote all the shares of stock in GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
INCORPORATED which the undersigned is entitled to vote at Granites Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held at the Embassy Suites, 1441 Canyon Del Rey, Seaside, California on May 15, 2009, at
10:30 a.m., local time, and at any adjournment thereof (1) as specified upon the proposals listed
below and as more particularly described in Granites Proxy Statement dated April 3, 2009, and (2)
in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting.
PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN, AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED
POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE OR PROVIDE YOUR INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTE VIA
THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE.
(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED ANNUAL MEETING, MAY 15, 2009
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!
Annual meeting materials are available online at: http://www.cfpproxy.com/5195
You can vote in one of three ways:
1. Call toll free 1-888-216-1289 on a touch-tone phone. There is NO CHARGE to you for this call.
or
2. Via the Internet at https://www.proxyvotenow.com/gva and follow the instructions.
or
3. Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope.
PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS
5195
PLEASE MARK VOTES AS IN THIS EXAMPLE
REVOCABLE PROXY
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
MAY 15, 2009
Withhold For All For All Except
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS To elect David H. Kelsey, and James W. Bradford, Jr. as directors to hold
office for a three-year term and until their respective successors are elected and have qualified.
Nominees:
(01) David H. Kelsey (02) James W. Bradford, Jr.
INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any nominee(s), mark For All Except and write that
nominee(s) name(s) or number(s) in the space provided below.
A vote FOR proposals 1, 2 & 3 is recommended by the Board of Directors
For Against Abstain
2. To act upon a proposal to amend the Granite Construction Incorporated amended and restated 1999
Equity Incentive Plan.
3. To ratify the appointment by Granites Audit/Compliance Committee of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as Granites independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009.
4. To grant discretionary authority to William G. Dorey or LeAnne M. Stewart to vote upon such
other matters as may properly come before the meeting. (no vote required)
The persons that have made this solicitation know at this time of no other matters to be presented
at the meeting.
The shares represented hereby shall be voted as specified. If no specification is made, such shares
will be voted in favor of Proposals 1, 2, and 3.
Mark here if you plan to attend the meeting
Mark here for address change and note change below
Please be sure to date and sign this proxy card in the box below.
Date
Note: Please sign exactly as your name appears on this proxy card.
If signing for estates, trusts, corporations or partnerships, title or capacity should be stated.
If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign.
Sign above
IF YOU WISH TO PROVIDE YOUR INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET, PLEASE READ THE
INSTRUCTIONS BELOW
FOLD AND DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE VOTING BY MAIL
PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS S
Shareholders of record have three ways to vote:
1. By Mail; or
2. By Telephone (using a touch-tone phone); or
3. By Internet.
A telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as
if you marked, signed, dated and returned this proxy. Please note telephone and Internet votes must
be cast prior to 3 a.m. PDT, May 15, 2009. It is not necessary to return this proxy if you vote by
telephone or Internet.
Vote by Telephone
Call toll-free on a touch-tone phone anytime prior to 3 a.m. PDT, May 15, 2009:
1-888-216-1289
Vote by Internet
vote online anytime prior to 3 a.m. PDT, May 15, 2009:
https://www.proxyvotenow.com/gva
Please note that the last vote received, whether by telephone, Internet or by mail, will be the
vote counted.
ONLINE ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS: http://www.cfpproxy.com/5195
Your vote is important!
PROXY
Granite Construction Incorporated
ALLOCATED SHARES VOTING DIRECTIVE CARD FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
May 15, 2009 10:30 a.m.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND
MAY BE REVOKED BEFORE IT IS VOTED.
The undersigned hereby directs Union Bank of California, N.A. as Trustee of the GRANITE
CONSTRUCTION Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the Plan) to vote all of the allocated shares of
stock of GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED beneficially held for the undersigned by the Trust at
Granites Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the Embassy Suites, 1441 Canyon Del Rey,
Seaside, California on May 15, 2009, at 10:30 a.m., local time, and at any adjournment thereof (1)
as specified upon the proposals listed below or as more particularly described in Granites Proxy
Statement dated April 3, 2009, and (2) to grant to William G. Dorey and LeAnne M. Stewart the
discretion to vote said shares upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting.
IMPORTANT: PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL PROMPTLY THE ALLOCATED SHARES VOTING DIRECTIVE CARD IN THE
ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE TO ASSURE THAT YOUR SHARES ARE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. If you fail to
return your voting directive card to the Trustee by May 12, 2009, you will be deemed to have
authorized the Plans Committee to direct the Trustee how to vote these shares. As a participant in
the Plan, you are entitled to vote your allocated portion of the shares of the common stock held in
the Plan by the Trust. Your voting direction submitted to Union Bank of California, N.A., Trustee
of the Plan, will be confidential.
PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN, AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED
POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE OR PROVIDE YOUR INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTE VIA
THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE.
(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED ANNUAL MEETING, MAY 15, 2009
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!
Annual meeting materials are available online at: http://www.cfpproxy.com/5195
You can vote in one of three ways:
1. Call toll free 1-888-216-1289 on a touch-tone phone. There is NO CHARGE to you for this call.
or
2. Via the Internet at https://www.proxyvotenow.com/gva and follow the instructions.
or
3. Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope.
PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS
5195/7299
PLEASE MARK VOTES AS IN THIS EXAMPLE
REVOCABLE PROXY
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
Annual Meeting of Shareholders MAY 15, 2009
Withhold For All For All Except
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS To elect David H. Kelsey, and James W. Bradford, Jr. as directors to hold
office for a three-year term and until their respective successors are elected and have qualified.
Nominees:
(01) David H. Kelsey (02) James W. Bradford, Jr.
INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any nominee(s), mark For All Except and write that
nominee(s) name(s) or number(s) in the space provided below.
A vote FOR proposals 1, 2 & 3 is recommended by the Board of Directors.
For Against Abstain
2. To act upon a proposal to amend the Granite Construction Incorporated Amended and Restated 1999
Equity Incentive Plan.
3. To ratify the appointment by Granites Audit/Compliance Committee of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as Granites independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009.
4. To grant discretionary authority to William G. Dorey or LeAnne M. Stewart to vote upon such
other matters as may properly come before the meeting. (No vote required)
The persons that have made this solicitation know at this time of no other matters to be presented
at the meeting.
The shares represented hereby shall be voted as specified. If no specification is made, I authorize
the Plans Committee to direct the Trustee how to vote these shares.
Mark here if you plan to attend the meeting
Mark here for address change and note change below
Please date and sign your name exactly as it appears Date on the stock certificate representing
your shares.
Sign above
IMPORTANT: PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND MAIL PROMPTLY THIS PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE TO
ASSURE THAT YOUR SHARES ARE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. If you attend the meeting, you may vote in
person should you wish to do so even though you have already sent in your Proxy.
IF YOU WISH TO PROVIDE YOUR INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET, PLEASE READ THE
INSTRUCTIONS BELOW
FOLD AND DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE VOTING BY MAIL
PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS S
Shareholders of record have three ways to vote:
1. By Mail; or
2. By Telephone (using a touch-tone phone); or
3. By Internet.
A telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as
if you marked, signed, dated and returned this proxy. Please note telephone and Internet votes must
be cast prior to 3 a.m. PDT, May 15, 2009. It is not necessary to return this proxy if you vote by
telephone or Internet.
Vote by Telephone
Call toll-free on a touch-tone phone anytime prior to 3 a.m. PDT, May 15, 2009:
1-888-216-1289
Vote by Internet
Vote online anytime prior to 3 a.m. PDT, May 15, 2009:
https://www.proxyvotenow.com/gva
Please note that the last vote received, whether by telephone, Internet or by mail, will be the
vote counted.
ONLINE ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS: http://www.cfpproxy.com/5195
Your vote is important!
Rev. 1
PROXY TABULATOR
P.O. BOX 9112
FARMINGDALE, NY 11735
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
Profit Sharing and 401(K) Plan Voting Directive Card for
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The undersigned hereby directs Mercer Trust Company, as Trustee of the Granite Construction Profit
Sharing and 401(K) Plan, to vote all the shares of stock in GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
(Granite) beneficially held for me by the Plan at Granites Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be
held at the Embassy Suites, 1441 Canyon Del Rey, Seaside, California on May 15, 2009 at 10:30 a.m.,
local time, and at any adjournment thereof (1) as specified upon the proposals listed on the
reverse side of this card and as more particularly described in Granites Proxy Statement dated
April 3, 2009, and (2) to grant to William G. Dorey and LeAnne M. Stewart the discretion to vote
said shares upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting.
The shares represented here shall be voted as specified. IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE I AUTHORIZE
FIDUCIARY COUNSELORS INC., AS INDEPENDENT FIDUCIARY FOR THE PLAN, TO DIRECT THE TRUSTEE HOW TO
VOTE THESE SHARES.
|
|
|
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE
|
PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE
|
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
|
|
|
|
Date: , 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Signature(s)
|
|
(Sign in the Box) |
|
|
|
*(Please sign your name exactly as it appears on this proxy card) |
IMPORTANT: PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND MAIL PROMPTLY THE ENCLOSED PROFIT SHARING AND
401(K) PLAN VOTING DIRECTIVE CARD IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE TO ASSURE
THAT YOUR SHARES ARE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. If the Trustee has not
received your voting directive card by May 12, 2009 Fiduciary Counselors Inc.,
as independent fiduciary for the Plan, will direct the Trustee how to vote
these shares. As a participant in the Granite Construction Profit Sharing and
401(K) Plan (the Plan), you are entitled to vote your shares of the Common
Stock held in the Plan. Your voting direction submitted to Mercer Trust
Company, Trustee of the Plan, will be confidential.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSALS 1, 2, and 3.
Please
fill in box(es) as shown using black or blue ink or number 2 pencil.
Ä
PLEASE DO NOT USE FINE POINT PENS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
|
|
FOR
|
|
WITHHOLD
|
|
FOR ALL |
|
To elect nominees as directors to hold office for a three-year term and until their respective
successors are elected and have qualified.
|
|
all nominees
|
|
for all
nominees
|
|
Except |
|
|
(01) David H. Kelsey and
(02) James W. Bradford. Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Instruction: To withhold authority to vote for any nominee(s), write that nominees(s)
names(s) or number(s) on the space provided above.) |
|
Ä
|
|
Ä
|
|
Ä |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
To act upon a proposal to amend the Granite Construction Incorporated Amended and
Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
Ä
|
|
Ä
|
|
Ä |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
To ratify the appointment by Granites Audit/Compliance Committee of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as Granites independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2009.
|
|
Ä
|
|
Ä
|
|
Ä |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
To grant discretionary authority to William G. Dorey and LeAnne M. Stewart to vote upon such
other matters as may properly come before the meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The persons that have made this solicitation know at this time of no other matters to be
presented at the meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE SIGN AND DATE ON THE REVERSE SIDE