SCHEDULE 14A
                                 (RULE 14a-101)

                    INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant [ ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [X]

Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
    Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[X] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12


                              WACHOVIA CORPORATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


                              SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.


   1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

________________________________________________________________________________


   2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

________________________________________________________________________________


   3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant
      to Exchange Act Rule 0-11: (set forth the amount on which the filing fee
      is calculated and state how it was determined):

________________________________________________________________________________


   4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

________________________________________________________________________________


   5) Total fee paid:

________________________________________________________________________________

[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

________________________________________________________________________________

[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
    Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
    paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
    number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

   1) Amount Previously Paid:

________________________________________________________________________________

   2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

________________________________________________________________________________

   3) Filing Party:

________________________________________________________________________________

   4) Date Filed:

________________________________________________________________________________




THE FOLLOWING IS A PRESS RELEASE ISSUED YESTERDAY BY SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.


                                                                            NEWS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUNTRUST



                                        
CONTACTS:
Investors                Media
Gary Peacock             Barry Koling          George Sard/Debbie Miller/Denise DesChenes
SunTrust                 SunTrust              Citigate Sard Verbinnen
404-230-5392             404-230-5268          212-687-8080


For Immediate Release
---------------------
July 24, 2001

                 SUNTRUST URGES WACHOVIA SHAREHOLDERS TO REJECT
                        PROPOSED FIRST UNION TRANSACTION

     ATLANTA, GA - SunTrust Banks, Inc. (NYSE:STI) today sent the following
letter to the shareholders of Wachovia Corporation (NYSE:WB) summarizing the
major reasons why SunTrust believes shareholders should vote against the
proposed First Union (NYSE: FTU) transaction.

     The text of the letter follows:

                                                                   July 24, 2001

Dear Wachovia Shareholder:

     The vote on the First Union merger proposal at Wachovia's August 3
shareholders' meeting is now only days away, and this may be your last
opportunity to secure a better deal by voting "AGAINST" that merger. Even if you
previously voted in favor of the First Union merger proposal, you can still
change your vote. To vote "AGAINST" the merger, simply sign, date and return the
enclosed BLUE proxy card. TIME IS SHORT - ACT TODAY.

With the voting deadline rapidly approaching, we thought it would be helpful to
summarize what we see as the ten major reasons for Wachovia shareholders to
reject the First Union merger proposal:

1. SUNTRUST PROVIDES SUPERIOR VALUE

   The numbers don't lie. SunTrust's merger proposal has had a higher value than
   the First Union merger proposal every day since our merger proposal was
   announced more than 10 weeks ago. Based on July 23, 2001 closing prices,
   SunTrust's merger proposal represents an AGGREGATE PREMIUM TO WACHOVIA
   SHAREHOLDERS OF APPROXIMATELY $800 MILLION over the implied value of the
   proposed First Union merger. While these values fluctuate daily with changes
   in the market value of SunTrust's and First Union's shares, as recently as
   July 17, 2001 SunTrust's merger proposal represented an AGGREGATE PREMIUM OF
   MORE THAN $1 BILLION over the implied value of the proposed First Union
   merger.

2. SUNTRUST'S SIMPLER AND BETTER DIVIDEND

   SunTrust's dividend proposal is simple and straightforward. We would
   increase our dividend so that




   on a pro forma basis you would receive the same $2.40 per share dividend you
   currently receive from Wachovia. And just as importantly, WHEN SUNTRUST'S
   DIVIDEND INCREASES, YOU WOULD PARTICIPATE IN THAT DIVIDEND INCREASE FROM THE
   FIRST CENT ON UP.

   Under First Union's complex dividend plan, the current annual dividend rate
   on your common stock will fall from $2.40 per share to $1.92 per share on a
   pro forma basis - $0.48 per share less than you currently receive from
   Wachovia. Because of this, First Union is offering a choice of an additional
   $0.48 per share payment in the first year only or a new and complicated
   separate security that First Union calls a "DEP." THE PROBLEM WITH THE DEP,
   OF COURSE, IS THAT IF FIRST UNION'S COMMON STOCK DIVIDEND GOES UP, THE
   PAYMENT ON THE DEP GOES DOWN. First Union would have to increase its annual
   common stock dividend payment by more than $0.48 per share, or 25%, before
   you receive the first cent of any actual First Union dividend increase.

********************************************************************************

                                    BULLETIN

THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT RECENTLY RULED THAT WACHOVIA'S DIRECTORS
BREACHED THEIR FIDUCIARY DUTY TO YOU BY AGREEING TO A "COERCIVE" NON-TERMINATION
PROVISION IN THE FIRST UNION MERGER AGREEMENT. AS DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 10 OF
THIS LETTER, THAT PROVISION WAS INVALIDATED BY THE COURT.


********************************************************************************

3. SUNTRUST'S SUPERIOR DIVIDEND HISTORY

   SunTrust's dividend rate has increased every year since its formation in
   1985. During the past five years, SunTrust's dividend increased from $0.83
   per share in 1996 to $1.60 per share today (on an annualized basis) -- an
   increase during the five-year period of 93%. Over the same five-year period,
   First Union's dividend fell from $1.10 per share in 1996 to only $0.96 per
   share today (on an annualized basis). And earlier this year, FIRST UNION
   SURPRISED ITS SHAREHOLDERS WITH A MASSIVE 50% CUT IN DIVIDENDS only weeks
   after First Union's Chief Executive Officer said there was no need to cut the
   dividend.

4. SUNTRUST'S STRONGER EARNINGS AND REVENUE GROWTH

   In 1996, First Union had core earnings per share of $3.10. The First Call
   consensus estimate for 2001 is for First Union core earnings per share of
   $2.60 -- a $0.50 per share, or 16%, decrease. In contrast, comparable
   figures for SunTrust show a 75% rise during the same period from $2.72 to
   $4.76 per share.

   Similarly, in 1996, First Union had per share revenue of $13.11.
   Annualizing its performance for the first half of 2001 leads to 2001
   revenue of $13.49 per share, an increase of less than 3% in five years.
   Comparable figures for SunTrust during the same five year period show an
   increase from $11.58 to $17.68, or an increase of 53%.


                                       2




5. FIRST UNION'S POOR STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE

   At the start of 1999, First Union's stock price was $60.81. By the end of
   1999, it was $32.94. Even today -- despite First Union's constant talk
   about "restructuring," "revitalization," "new management" and "momentum,"
   THE FACT IS FIRST UNION'S STOCK PRICE IS ONLY $34.74 - AN INCREASE OF BARELY
   5% IN MORE THAN 18 MONTHS SINCE THE END OF 1999.

6. FIRST UNION'S HIGH RISK PROFILE AND VOLATILE EARNINGS MIX

   In contrast to SunTrust and Wachovia, First Union is engaged in higher risk
   businesses resulting in a more volatile earnings mix. For example, First
   Union is committed to investment banking on a national scale, a highly
   competitive business where First Union has no competitive advantage. Its
   corporate and investment banking operating earnings declined 45% from the
   first quarter of 2000 to the second quarter of 2001. FIRST UNION ALSO HAS A
   MUCH MORE RISKY BALANCE SHEET THAN SUNTRUST OR WACHOVIA. Notably, First Union
   has a principal investing portfolio (including high risk technology venture
   capital investments) totaling $3 billion at the beginning of 2001. WE DOUBT
   YOU INTENDED TO INVEST IN A COMPANY WITH THIS TYPE OF RISK PROFILE WHEN YOU
   BOUGHT YOUR WACHOVIA SHARES.

7. FIRST UNION'S HISTORY OF BUNGLED ACQUISITIONS

   First Union always claims its major acquisitions will be successful, but
   has a deeply disturbing history of overpredicting and underdelivering. When
   First Union announced its proposed acquisition of CoreStates Financial Corp.
   in November 1997, it presented illustrative post-acquisition 1999 earnings
   per share of $4.46. When the acquisition was completed in 1998, First Union
   lost 19% of CoreStates customers and suffered major integration problems. And
   when 1999 came, First Union's operating earnings per share were only $3.40 -
   23.8% LESS THAN FIRST UNION PRESENTED WHEN ANNOUNCING THE ACQUISITION.

   In June 1998, First Union acquired The Money Store for $2.1 billion. The
   acquisition turned out to be a complete failure and just two years later --
   in June 2000 -- First Union announced that The Money Store was being shut
   down. THE MONEY STORE DEBACLE CONTRIBUTED TO RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
   OF $4.9 BILLION AGAINST FIRST UNION'S EARNINGS IN 2000 -- ONE OF THE LARGEST
   CHARGES AGAINST EARNINGS IN THE HISTORY OF CORPORATE AMERICA.

8. FIRST UNION PLANS MORE JOB LOSSES AND BRANCH CLOSINGS

   First Union already has increased its estimate of the number of Wachovia
   bank branches it plans on shutting down. It now says it will close 325
   Wachovia branches -- almost half of Wachovia's existing bank branches. First
   Union also plans on eliminating 7,000 jobs. In contrast, SunTrust expects to
   eliminate 3,000 fewer jobs and to close 150 to 175 fewer branches --
   including no merger-related closings in North Carolina and South Carolina.

9. FIRST UNION'S TRAMPLING OF SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS

   First Union, in our view, has already shown a complete disregard for your
   rights as a shareholder of Wachovia. In response to SunTrust's proposal for
   an amendment to Wachovia's bylaws that would have allowed holders of 10% of
   Wachovia shares to call a special meeting of shareholders, within a

                                       3




    matter of days First Union engineered a new law in North Carolina which
    effectively eliminated the right of Wachovia shareholders to call a special
    meeting.

10. COURT THROWS OUT "COERCIVE" PROVISION IN FIRST UNION MERGER AGREEMENT

    A recent decision of the North Carolina Business Court struck down a
    "coercive" provision in the First Union merger agreement that would have
    prevented Wachovia from entering into a merger agreement with SunTrust
    before mid-January 2002. THE COURT'S DECISION MEANS THAT WACHOVIA AND
    SUNTRUST CAN NOW BEGIN NEGOTIATING A MERGER AGREEMENT THE DAY WACHOVIA
    SHAREHOLDERS REJECT THE PROPOSED FIRST UNION MERGER. This is an important
    victory for Wachovia shareholders. In finding the merger agreement provision
    invalid and unenforceable, the Court found the provision to be an
    "impermissible abrogation of the duties of the Wachovia directors." The
    Court stated that by agreeing to this provision, the Wachovia Board
    "impermissibly tied its hands" and "limited their ability to perform their
    fiduciary duties." IT IS CLEAR THAT NEITHER FIRST UNION NOR WACHOVIA WAS
    LOOKING OUT FOR YOUR INTERESTS WHEN THEY PUT THAT INVALID PROVISION IN
    THEIR MERGER AGREEMENT.

    We urge you to protect your investment and preserve your choices. Vote
    "AGAINST" the First Union merger proposal by signing, dating and returning
    the enclosed BLUE proxy card. Time is short, so please act today.

Thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,


/s/ L. Phillip Humann
L. Phillip Humann
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer

********************************************************************************
                                    IMPORTANT

If you have questions in voting your shares, please contact the firm assisting
us in the solicitation of proxies:

                           INNISFREE M&A INCORPORATED

             TOLL-FREE SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION LINE: 1-877-750-9501

********************************************************************************

                            SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS -- CERTAIN LITIGATION

On July 20, 2001, the North Carolina Business Court declared invalid and
unenforceable a provision of

                                       4




the Merger Agreement between First Union and Wachovia that would have prevented
Wachovia from entering into a merger agreement with SunTrust or any other party
other than First Union before January 16, 2002. As a result of this decision,
Wachovia is in a position to enter into negotiations with SunTrust or any other
party immediately following rejection of the proposed First Union merger by
Wachovia shareholders. Also, on July 20, 2001, the Court declined to
preliminarily enjoin enforcement of First Union's stock lock-up option or the
filing of a certificate of merger.

On May 14, 2001 SunTrust delivered a merger proposal to the Board of Directors
of Wachovia. Subject to future developments, SunTrust intends to file with the
SEC a registration statement at a date or dates subsequent hereto to register
the SunTrust shares to be issued in its proposed merger with Wachovia. Investors
and security holders are urged to read the registration statement (when
available) and any other relevant documents filed or to be filed with the SEC,
as well as any amendments or supplements to those documents, because they
contain (or will contain) important information. Investors and security holders
may obtain a free copy of the registration statement (when available) and such
other relevant documents at the SEC's Internet web site at www.sec.gov. The
registration statement (when available) and such other documents may also be
obtained free of charge from SunTrust by directing such request to: SunTrust,
303 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30308, Attention: Gary Peacock
(404-658-4753). This letter contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or
other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements can be found in
SunTrust's Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on June 25, 2001 and in SunTrust's
reports (such as Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and
Current Reports on Form 8-K) filed with the SEC and available at the SEC's
Internet site (http://www.sec.gov).

     SunTrust Banks, Inc., based in Atlanta, Georgia, is the nation's 9th
largest commercial banking organization. The Company provides a wide range of
services to meet the financial needs of its growing customer base in Alabama,
Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Tennessee, Virginia, and the District of Columbia.
Its primary businesses include traditional deposit and credit services as well
as trust and investment services. Through various subsidiaries the Company
provides credit cards, mortgage banking, insurance, brokerage and investment
services. SunTrust's Internet address is www.suntrust.com

                                      # # #

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements include, but
are not limited to, (i) statements about the benefits of a merger between
SunTrust and Wachovia Corporation, including future financial and operating
results, cost savings and accretion to reported and cash earnings that may be
realized from such merger; (ii) statements with respect to SunTrust's plans,
objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not
historical facts; and (iii) other statements identified by words such as
"believes", "expects", "anticipates", "estimates", "intends", "plans",
"targets", "projects" and similar expressions. These statements are based upon
the current beliefs and expectations of SunTrust's management and are subject to
significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ from those set
forth in the forward-looking statements.

The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ
materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the
forward-looking statements: (1) the businesses of SunTrust and Wachovia may not
be integrated successfully or such integration may be more difficult,
time-consuming or costly than expected; (2) expected revenue synergies and cost
savings from the merger may not be fully realized or realized within the
expected time frame; (3) revenues following the merger may be lower than
expected; (4) deposit attrition, operating costs, customer loss and business
disruption, including,

                                       5




without limitation, difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees,
customers, clients or suppliers, may be greater than expected following the
merger; (5) the regulatory approvals required for the merger may not be obtained
on the proposed terms or on the anticipated schedule; (6) the failure of
SunTrust's and Wachovia's stockholders to approve the merger; (7) competitive
pressures among depository and other financial institutions may increase
significantly and may have an effect on pricing, spending, third-party
relationships and revenues; (8) the strength of the United States economy in
general and the strength of the local economies in which the combined company
will conduct operations may be different than expected, resulting in, among
other things, a deterioration in credit quality or a reduced demand for credit,
including the resultant effect on the combined company's loan portfolio and
allowance for loan losses; (9) changes in the U.S. and foreign legal and
regulatory framework; and (10) adverse conditions in the stock market, the
public debt market and other capital markets (including changes in interest rate
conditions) and the impact of such conditions on the combined company's capital
markets and asset management activities. Additional factors that could cause
SunTrust's results to differ materially from those described in the
forward-looking statements can be found in SunTrust's reports (such as Annual
Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form
8-K) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available at the
SEC's Internet site (http://www.sec.gov). All subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements concerning the proposed transaction or other matters
attributable to SunTrust or any person acting on its behalf are expressly
qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above. SunTrust does
not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect
circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements
are made.

On May 14, 2001, SunTrust delivered a merger proposal to the Board of Directors
of Wachovia. Subject to future developments, SunTrust intends to file with the
SEC a registration statement at a date or dates subsequent hereto to register
the SunTrust shares to be issued in its proposed merger with Wachovia. Investors
and security holders are urged to read the registration statement (when
available) and any other relevant documents filed or to be with the SEC, as well
as any amendments or supplements to those documents, because they contain (or
will contain) important information. Investors and security holders may obtain a
free copy of the registration statement (when available) and such other
documents at the SEC's Internet web site at www.sec.gov. The registration
statement (when available) and such other documents may also be obtained free of
charge from SunTrust by directing such request to: SunTrust Banks, Inc., 303
Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30308, Attention: Gary Peacock
(404-658-4753).


                                       6