FORM 6-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of May 2003 Commission File Number: 1-14836 ALSTOM ------ (Translation of registrant's name into English) 25, avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France -------------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F Form 20-F X Form 40-F ----- ----- Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): Yes No X ----- ----- Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): Yes No X ----- ----- Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant, by furnishing the information contained in this Form, is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Yes No X ----- ----- If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the Registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b)Enclosures: Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Year 2003.........................3 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects..................................65 Press Release dated May 14, 2003 "ALSTOM Full-Year Results 2002/03 (1st April 2002 - 31st March 2003)" .........................................147
Consolidated financial statements Fiscal year 2003
ALSTOM CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year ended March 31, (in million) Note 2001(*) 2002(*) 2003 ---------------- ---------------- --------------- SALES 24,550 23,453 21,351 Of which products 17,569 17,541 16,374 Of which services 6,981 5,912 4,977 Cost of sales (20,428 ) (19,623 ) (19,114 ) Of which products (14,761 ) (15,141 ) (15,431 ) Of which services (5,667 ) (4,482 ) (3,683 ) Selling expenses (1,140 ) (1,078 ) (970 ) Research and development expenses (629 ) (575 ) (622 ) Administrative expenses (1,202 ) (1,236 ) (1,079 ) ---------------- ---------------- --------------- OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 1,151 941 (434 ) Other income (expenses), net (4) (165 ) (390 ) (555 ) Other intangible assets amortisation (8) (55 ) (64 ) (67 ) ---------------- ---------------- --------------- EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAX 931 487 (1,056 ) Financial income (expense), net (5) (207 ) (294 ) (270 ) ---------------- ---------------- --------------- PRE-TAX INCOME (LOSS) 724 193 (1,326 ) Income tax (charge) credit (6) (174 ) (10 ) 241 Share in net income (loss) of equity investments (4 ) 1 3 Dividend on redeemable preference shares of a subsidiary - (14 ) - Minority interests (37 ) (23 ) (15 ) Goodwill amortisation (2 & 7) (305 ) (286 ) (284 ) ---------------- ---------------- --------------- 204 (139 ) (1,381 ) NET INCOME (LOSS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Earnings per share in Euro Basic 0.9 (0.6 ) (5.2 ) Diluted 0.9 (0.6 ) (5.2 ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (*) As published but after inclusion of the changes in presentation described in Note 2(a). The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in million) At March 31, Note 2001(*) 2002(*) 2003 ASSETS ------- -------------- -------------- ------------- Goodwill, net (7) 5,310 4,612 4,440 Other intangible assets, net (8) 1,187 1,170 1,168 Property, plant and equipment, net (9) 2,788 2,788 2,331 Equity method Investments and other investments, net (10) 323 301 245 Other fixed assets, net (11) 1,301 1,326 1,294 -------------- -------------- -------------- Fixed assets, net 10,909 10,197 9,478 Deferred taxes (6) 1,088 1,486 1,811 Inventories and contracts in progress, net (12) 6,049 5,593 4,608 Trade receivables, net (13) 7,029 4,730 4,855 Other accounts receivable, net (15) 2,816 3,304 2,265 -------------- -------------- -------------- Current assets 15,894 13,627 11,728 Short term investments (17) 496 331 142 Cash and cash equivalents (18) 2,524 1,905 1,628 -------------- -------------- -------------- TOTAL ASSETS 30,911 27,546 24,787 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LIABILITIES Shareholders' equity 2,090 1,752 805 Minority interests (19) 102 91 95 Redeemable preference shares of a subsidiary (22) 205 205 - Undated subordinated notes (22) 250 250 - Provisions for risks and charges (20) 4,591 3,849 3 631 Accrued pension and retirement benefits (21) 1,058 994 972 Financial debt (22) 6,231 6,035 6,331 Deferred taxes (6) 103 47 37 Customers' deposits and advances (24) 6,205 4,221 3,541 Trade payables 6,540 5,564 4,629 Accrued contract costs and other payables (23) 3,536 4,538 4,746 -------------- -------------- -------------- Current liabilities 16,281 14,323 12,916 -------------- -------------- -------------- TOTAL LIABILITIES 30,911 27,546 24,787 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commitments and contingencies (27&28) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (*) As published but after inclusion of the changes in presentation described in Note 2(a). The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year ended March 31, (in million) 2001(*) 2002(*) 2003 --------------- ----------------- ------------------ Net income (loss) 204 (139 ) (1,381 ) Minority interests 37 23 15 Depreciation and amortisation 854 792 754 Changes in provision for pension and retirement benefits, net 115 (51 ) 22 Net (gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets and investments - (198 ) (19 ) Share in net income (loss) of equity investees (net of dividends received) 4 - (3 ) Changes in deferred tax (36 ) (86 ) (402 ) Net income after elimination of non cash items 1,178 341 (1,014 ) Decrease (increase) in inventories and contracts in progress, net (1,462 ) 54 415 Decrease (increase) in trade and other receivables, net (1,504 ) 528 650 Increase (decrease) in sale of trade receivables, net 894 140 (661 ) Increase (decrease) in contract related provisions (813 ) (948 ) 87 Increase (decrease) in other provisions (144 ) 2 (49 ) Increase (decrease) in restructuring provisions (526 ) (123 ) (29 ) Increase (decrease) in customers' deposits and advances 2,603 (1,254 ) (98 ) Increase (decrease) in trade and other payables, accrued contract costs and accrued expenses (42 ) 681 162 Changes in net working capital (2) (994 ) (920 ) 477 --------------- ----------------- ------------------ Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 184 (579 ) (537 ) Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment 189 118 252 Capital expenditures (568 ) (550 ) (410 ) Decrease(increase) in other fixed assets ,net (382 ) (104 ) (55 ) Cash expenditures for acquisition of investments, net of net cash acquired (1,137 ) (113 ) (166 ) Cash proceeds from sale of investments, net of net cash sold 308 772 38 --------------- ----------------- ------------------ Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (1,590 ) 123 (341 ) Capital increase 33 - 622 Undated subordinated notes and redeemable preference shares 455 - - Dividends paid including minorities (118 ) (136 ) (1 ) --------------- ----------------- ------------------ Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 370 (136 ) 621 Net effect of exchange rate (20 ) (12 ) (41 ) Other changes (3) 151 16 (464 ) --------------- ----------------- ------------------ Decrease (increase) in net debt (905 ) (588 ) (762 ) --------------- ----------------- ------------------ Net debt at the beginning of the period (1) (2,306 ) (3,211 ) (3,799 ) --------------- ----------------- ------------------ Net debt at the end of the period (1) (3,211 ) (3,799 ) (4,561 ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash paid for income taxes 68 154 70 130 165 172 Cash paid for net interest ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (*) As published but after inclusion of the changes in presentation described in Note 2(a). (1) Net debt includes short-term investments, cash and cash equivalents net of financial debt. (2) See Note 16. (3) Including in year ended March 31, 2003 reclassification of redeemable preference shares of a subsidiary and undated subordinated notes totalling 455 million as disclosed in Note 22 (a). The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of Additional Cumulative in million, outstanding Paid-in Retained Translation Shareholders' except for number of shares shares Capital Capital Earnings Adjustment Equity ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------ -------------- April 1, 2000 213,698,403 1,282 62 688 (46 ) 1,986 Capital increase 1,689,056 10 23 _ _ 33 Changes in Cumulative Translation Adjustments _ _ _ _ (15 ) (15 ) Net income _ _ _ 204 _ 204 Dividend paid _ _ _ (118 ) _ (118 ) ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------ -------------- March 31, 2001 215,387,459 1,292 85 774 (61 ) 2,090 Changes in Cumulative Translation Adjustments _ _ _ _ (80) (80 ) Net income (loss) _ _ _ (139 ) _ (139 ) Dividend paid _ _ _ (119 ) _ (119 ) ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------ -------------- March 31, 2002 215,387,459 1,292 85 516 (141 ) 1,752 Capital increase 66,273,064 398 224 _ _ 622 Changes in Cumulative Translation Adjustments _ _ _ _ (188 ) (188 ) Net income (loss) _ _ _ (1,381 ) (1,381 )(1) Dividend paid _ _ _ _ _ _ ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------ -------------- March 31, 2003 281,660,523 1,690 309 (865 ) (329 ) 805 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Before allocation to be determined at the annual Shareholder's meeting to be held at the latest on July 2, 2003. In August 2000, a specific issue of shares reserved for employees was made and 1,689,056 shares were subscribed. Related costs net of tax of 7 million were charged against additional paid-in capital of 30 million. In July 2002, an issue of shares was made and 66,273,064 shares having a par value of 6 were subscribed. Related costs net of tax of 15 million were charged against additional paid-in capital of 239 million. At March 31, 2003, the issued paid-up share capital of the parent company, ALSTOM, amounted to 1,689,963,138 and was divided into 281,660,523 shares having a par value of 6. At the Ordinary General Shareholders' Meeting which is scheduled on first call on June 23, 2003 and if the quorum requirement is not met on that date will be held on July 2, 2003, the Board will propose that no dividend be paid. The negative variation of cumulative translation adjustment since April 1, 2002 is mainly due to the appreciation of the Euro mainly against British Pound, Brazilian Real and Mexican Peso and by the transfer to cumulative translation adjustment of exchange gains and losses on long term loans to subsidiaries that are considered as investments in such subsidiaries. The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1- Description of business and basis of preparation (a) Description of business The Company is a provider of energy and transport infrastructure. The energy market is served through activities in the fields of power generation and power transmission and distribution, power conversion, and the transport market through rail and marine activities. A range of components, systems and services is offered by the Company covering design, manufacture, commissioning, long-term maintenance, system integration, management of turnkey projects and applications of advanced technologies. (b) Basis of preparation ALSTOM (the Company) is a "société anonyme" organised under the laws of France and prepares its financial statements using accounting principles generally accepted in France. The Company, in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements, has used the following main assumptions that : - the shareholders prior to July 31, 2003 will approve at the shareholders meetings the principles of a capital increase - the financial covenants will be met, renewed or renegotiated as required - maturing debt will be reimbursed or refinanced as required Notes 22 (a) and (b) and 29 (e) set out the Company's financial debt covenants, maturity and liquidity. The Company's ability to meet the assumptions used in the preparation of its Consolidated Financial Statements set out above also depends on the success of its new action plan. The Company has taken into account the matters set out above and all other matters including the risks disclosed in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and has confirmed the applicability of the fundamental accounting principles, including going concern, cut-off between accounting periods (Accruals concept) and consistency of accounting principles. Note 2 - Summary of accounting policies The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with French Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and Règlements 99-02 & 00-06 of the Comité de Règlementation Comptable (French consolidation methodology). Benchmark treatments are generally used. Capital lease arrangements and long term rentals are not capitalised. If capital leases had been capitalised, the impact would have been an increase of property plant and equipment, net of 112 million and 212 million, an increase of financial debt of 119 million and 216 million and a decrease of shareholder's equity of 7 million and 4 million at March 31, 2002 and 2003 respectively. If long term rentals had been consolidated the impact would have been an increase of long-term lease receivable of 667 million and an increase of long-term lease payable of 667 million (Note 27 (b)).
(a) Change in presentation In the year ended March 31, 2003 the following changes in presentation have been made and previous years adjusted accordingly : (i) Amortisation of goodwill The presentation of goodwill amortisation previously included in Earnings Before Interest and Tax has been changed and is now presented immediately above net income. Previous years' comparative figures have been reclassified accordingly. This reclassificiation amounts to 305 million and 286 million for the years ended 31 March 2001 and 2002, respectively. The amortisation of other intangible assets continue to be shown as part of Earnings before Interest and Tax. (ii) Securitisation of future receivables The right to receive payment from certain customers for future receivables previously included in the line "Customer deposits and advances" has been reclassified in financial debt following a recommendation issued by the Commission des Opérations de Bourse and the Commission Bancaire on 15 November 2002 and the related interpretation issued by the French National Audit Association (CNCC). Previous' years comparative figures have been reclassified accordingly in the balance sheets and the statements of cash flows. This restatement amounts to 1,578 million and 1,735 million for the years ended 31 March 2001 and 2002, respectively. The related costs previously included in the line "Other income (expenses) net" have been reclassified and disclosed separately as part of "Financial income (expenses) net". This amounts to 90 million and 87 million at 31 March 2001 and 2002 respectively. (iii) Sale of trade receivables In the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow the net cash provided by (used in) sale of trade receivables previously included in the line "Decrease (increase) in trade and other receivables, net" has been disclosed separately as part of "Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities". This amounts to 894 million and 140 million at 31 March 2001 and 2002 respectively. (iv) Deferred tax Deferred tax assets and liabilities have been netted either by tax grouping or by legal entity. This netting decrease the deferred tax asset and liability positions by 755 million and 658 million at 31 March 2001 and 2002 respectively.
(b) Consolidation methods Investments over which the Company has direct or indirect control of more than 50% of the outstanding voting shares, or over which it exercises effective control, are fully consolidated. Control exists where the Company has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an enterprise so as to obtain benefits from its activities. Joint ventures in companies in which the Company has joint control are consolidated by the proportionate method with the Company's share of the joint ventures' results, assets and liabilities recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Investments in which the Company has an equity interest of 20% to 50% and over which the Company exercises significant influence, but not control, are accounted for under the equity method. Results of operations of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statements as from the date of acquisition or up to the date of disposal, respectively. Inter Company balances and transactions are eliminated on consolidation. A list of the Company's major consolidated businesses and investees and the applicable method of consolidation is provided in Note 32. (c) Use of estimates The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent gains and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of the revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management reviews estimates on an ongoing basis using currently available information. Costs to date are considered, as are estimated costs to complete and estimated future costs of warranty obligations. Estimates of future cost reflect management's current best estimate of the probable outflow of financial resources that will be required to settle contractual obligations. The assumptions to calculate present obligations take into account current technology as well as the commercial and contractual positions, assessed on a contract by contract basis. The introduction of technologically advanced products exposes the Company to risks of product failure significantly beyond the terms of standard contractual warranties applying to suppliers of equipment only. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in actual financial consequences different from the estimates. (d) Revenue and cost recognition Revenue on contracts which are of less than one year duration, substantially the sale of manufactured products, is recognised upon transfer of title, including the risks and rewards of ownership, which generally occurs on delivery to the customer. Revenue on construction type contracts of more than one year, long term contracts, is recognised on the percentage of completion method, measured either by segmented portions of the contract "contract milestones" or costs incurred to date compared to estimated total costs.
Claims are recognised as revenue when it is probable that the claim will result in additional revenue and the amount can be reasonably estimated, which generally occurs upon agreement by the customer. Government subsidies relating to the shipbuilding sector are added to the related contract value and are recognised as revenue using the percentage of completion method. For long term service contracts, revenues are generally recognised on a straight line basis over the term of the contract. Total estimated costs at completion include direct (such as material and labor) and indirect contract costs incurred to date as well as estimated similar costs to complete, including warranty accruals and costs to settle claims or disputes that are considered probable. Selling and administrative expenses are charged to expense as incurred. As a result of contract review, accruals for losses on contracts and other contract related provisions are recorded as soon as they are probable in the line item "Cost of sales" in the Consolidated Income Statement. Adjustments to contract estimates resulting from job conditions and performance, as well as changes in estimated profitability, are recognised in "Cost of Sales" as soon as they occur. Cost of sales is computed on the basis of percentage of completion applied to total estimated costs. The excess of that amount over the cost of sales reported in prior periods is the cost of revenues for the period. Contract completion accruals are recorded for future expenses to be incurred in connection with the completion of contracts or of identifiable portions of contracts. Warranty provisions are estimated on the basis of contractual agreement and available statistical data. (e) Translation of financial statements denominated in foreign currencies The functional currency of the Company's foreign subsidiaries is the applicable local currency. Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries located outside the Euro zone are translated into euros at the year-end rate of exchange, and their income statements and cash flow statements are converted at the average annual rate of exchange. The resulting translation adjustment is included as a component of shareholders' equity. (f) Foreign currency transactions Foreign currency transactions are translated into local currency at the rate of exchange applicable to the transaction (market rate or forward hedge rate). At year-end, foreign currency assets and liabilities to be settled are translated into local currency at the rate of exchange prevailing at that date or the forward hedge rate. Resulting exchange rate differences are included in the Consolidated Income Statement. (g) Financial instruments The Company operates internationally giving rise to exposure to market risks and changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Financial instruments are utilised by the Company to reduce those risks. The Company's policy is to hedge currency exposures by holding or issuing financial instruments.
The Company enters into various interest rate swaps, forward rate agreements ("FRA") and floors to manage its interest rate exposures. Net interest is accrued as either interest receivable or payable with the offset recorded in financial interest. The Company enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency transactions. Realised and unrealised gains and losses on these instruments are deferred and recorded in the carrying amount of the related hedged asset, liability or firm commitment. The Company also uses export insurance contracts to hedge its currency exposure on certain long-term contracts during the open bid time as well as when the commercial contract is signed. If the Company is not successful in signing the contract, the Company incurs no additional liability towards the insurance company except the prepaid premium. As a consequence, during the open bid period, these insurance contracts are accounted for as such, the premium being expensed when incurred. When the contract is signed, the insurance contract is accounted for as described above for forward foreign exchange contracts. In addition, the Company may enter into derivatives in order to optimise the use of some of its existing assets. Such a decision is taken on a case by case basis and is subject to approval by the management. (h) Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination. Initial estimates of fair values are finalised at the end of the financial year following the year of acquisition. Thereafter, releases of unrequired provisions for risks and charges resulting from the purchase price allocation are applied to goodwill. Goodwill is amortised on the straight-line basis over a period of twenty years in all sectors due to the long-term nature of the contracts and activities involved. (i) Other intangible assets The Company recognises other intangible assets such as technology, licensing agreements, installed bases of customers, etc. These acquired intangible assets are amortised on the straight-line basis over a period of twenty years in all sectors due to the long-term nature of the contracts and activities involved. (j) Impairment At the balance sheet date, whenever events or changes in markets indicate a potential impairment including goodwill, other intangible assets, property, plant and equipment and deferred tax assets, a detailed review is carried out based on projected operating performance. Whenever such review indicates that there is an impairment, the carrying amount of such assets is reduced to their estimated recoverable value.
(k) Property, plant and equipment Property, plant and equipment are recorded at historical cost to the Company. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimated useful life in years ---------------------------- Buildings 25 Machinery and equipment 10 Tools, furniture, fixtures and others 3-7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assets financed through capital lease are not capitalised (see Note 27 (b)) (l) Other investments Other investments are recorded at the lower of historical cost or net realisable value, assessed on an individual investment basis. The net realisable value is calculated using the following parameters : equity value, profitability and expected cash flow from the investment. (m) Other fixed assets Other fixed assets are recorded at the lower of historical cost or net realisable value, assessed on an individual investment basis. (n) Inventories and contracts in progress Raw materials and supplies, work and contracts in progress, and finished products are stated at the lower of cost, using the weighted average cost method, or net realisable value. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and selling expenses. Inventory cost includes costs of acquiring inventories and bringing them to their existing location and condition. Finished goods and work and contract in progress inventory includes an allocation of applicable manufacturing overheads. (o) Short-term investments Short-term investments include debt and equity securities and deposits with an initial maturity greater than three months but available for sale. Short-term investments are recorded at the lower of cost or market value, on a line by line basis (p) Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of less than three months.
(q) Deferred taxation Deferred taxes are calculated for each taxable entity for temporary differences arising between the tax value and book value of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised where timing differences are expected to reverse in future years. Deferred tax assets are recorded up to their expected recoverable amount. Deferred tax amounts are adjusted for changes in the applicable tax rate upon enactment. No provision is made for income taxes on accumulated earnings of consolidated businesses or equity method investees for which no distribution is planned. (r) Customer deposits and advances Customer deposits and advances are shown net, and represent amounts received from customers in advance of work being undertaken on their behalf. Where trading has taken place under the long term contract trading rules, but provisional acceptance of the contract has not taken place, the related customer advance is shown as a deduction from the related receivables. If any balance of customer deposits and advances is still outstanding and where work is undertaken on behalf of customers before sale, the related customer advance, termed a progress payment is deducted from Inventories and Contracts in Progress on a contract by contract basis. (s) Provisions for risks and charges A provision is recognised when the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation of uncertain timing or amount as a result of a past event and it is probable that an outflow of economic resources will be required to settle the obligation and such outflow can be reliably estimated. Provisions for warranties are recognised based on contract terms. Warranty periods may extend up to five years. The provisions are based on historical warranty data and a weighting of all possible outcomes against their associated probabilities. Provisions for contract losses are recorded at the point where the loss is first determined. Provisions are recorded for all penalties and claims based on management's assessment of the likely outcome. (t) Stock options Stock options are not recorded by the Company at the date of grant. However, upon exercise of stock options, the Company records the issuance of the common shares as an equity transaction based on the amount of cash received from the holders. (u) Research and development Internally generated research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
(v) Employee benefits The estimated cost of providing benefits to employees is accrued during the years in which the employees render services. For single employer defined benefit plans, the fair value of plan assets is assessed annually and actuarial assumptions are used to determine cost and benefit obligations. Liabilities and prepaid expenses are accrued over the estimated term of service of employees using actuarial methods. Experience gains and losses, as well as changes in actuarial assumptions and plan assets and provisions are amortised over the average future service period of employees. For defined contribution plans and multi-employer pension plans, expenses are recorded as incurred. (w) Restructuring Restructuring costs are accrued when management announces the reduction or closure of facilities, or a program to reduce the workforce and when related costs are precisely determined. Such costs include employees' severance and termination benefits, estimated facility closing costs and write-off of assets. (x) Financial income (expense) Financial income (expense) is principally comprised of interest payable on borrowings, interest receivable on funds invested, foreign exchange gains and losses, and gains and losses on hedging instruments that are recognised in the income statement. Interest income is recognised in the income statement as it accrues, taking into account the effective yield on the asset. Dividend income is recognised in the income statement on the date that the dividend is declared. All interest and other costs incurred in connection with borrowings are expensed as incurred as part of net financing costs. (y) Earnings per share Basic Earnings per share are computed by dividing the annual net income (loss) by the weighted average number of outstanding shares during the financial year. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing the annual net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the effect of any dilutive instruments. For the diluted earnings per share calculation, Net income (loss) is not adjusted as the Company has no interest bearing dilutive instruments.
(z) Exchange rates used for the translation of main currencies --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2001 2002 2003 -------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------- for 1 monetary unit Average Closing Average Closing Average Closing ---------------------------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------- British pound 1.632230 1.614987 1.627372 1.631321 1.549571 1.450116 Swiss franc 0.650100 0.654836 0.670010 0.681663 0.682536 0.677323 US dollar 1.106515 1.132246 1.136956 1.146263 0.997990 0.917852 Canadian dollar 0.733726 0.719217 0.725494 0.718236 0.646284 0.623558 Australian dollar 0.608764 0.550721 0.582556 0.610426 0.563472 0.553220 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note 3 - Changes in consolidated companies The main changes in the consolidated companies are as follows : (i) In April 2002, the Company acquired the remaining 49% of the share capital in Fiat Ferroviaria Spa now renamed ALSTOM Ferroviaria Spa for 154 million. This Company is fully consolidated since the acquisition date. (ii) In September 2002, operations in South Africa were sold to local empowerment participants and financiers. A 10 % interest in the acquiring Company has been retained. Gross proceeds from the sale are 50 million paid in October 2002. It is de-consolidated with effect from 30 September 2002. (iii)In January 2003, the wholly owned Company Alstom Power Insurance Ltd was de-consolidated with effect from 31 January 2003. Total gross proceeds as a result of this disposal were 101 million.
Note 4 - Other income (expense) net -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year ended March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 --------------------- -------------------- -------------------- Net gain on disposal of fixed assets 1 11 29 Net gain (loss) on disposal of investments (1) (4 ) 107 (35 ) Restructuring costs (81 ) (227 ) (268 ) Employees' profit sharing (25 ) (5 ) (18 ) Pension costs (Note 21) (112 ) (139 ) (214 ) Others, net (2) 56 (137 ) (49 ) --------------------- -------------------- -------------------- Other income (expense), net (165 ) (390 ) (555 ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) In the year ended March 31, 2002, it reflects the net gains on the disposal of Contracting Sector of 106 million and GTRM of 43 million and a net loss on disposal of the Waste to Energy business of (42) million. In the year ended March 31, 2003 it mainly reflects the net losses on disposal of South Africa operations and Alstom Power Insurance Ltd. (2) Included in Others, net in the year ended March 31, 2002 is 90 million for additional Marine vendor finance provisioning. Note 5 - Financial income (expense) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year ended March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 --------------------- -------------------- -------------------- Net interest income (expense) (1) (131 ) (163 ) (182 ) Securitisation expenses (90 ) (87 ) (82 ) Foreign currency gain (loss) (2) 39 (3 ) 55 Other financial income (expense) (3) (25 ) (41 ) (61 ) --------------------- -------------------- -------------------- Financial income (expense) (207 ) (294 ) (270 ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Including in the year ended March 31, 2003, 13 million of interest on redeemable preference shares of a subsidiary (See Note 22 (a)). (2) The foreign currency gain in the year ended March 31, 2003 mainly results from the unwinding of forward sale contracts of US dollars against euros following a reassessment of the financing structure in USA. (3) Other financial income (expenses), net include fees paid on bonds, guarantees and credit lines of 16 million, 22 million and 41 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively.
Note 6 - Income tax (a) Analysis by nature and geographic origin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year ended March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- France (65 ) (3 ) (3 ) Foreign (145 ) (94 ) (150 ) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Current income tax (210 ) (97 ) (153 ) France (11 ) 114 8 Foreign 47 (27 ) 386 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Deferred income tax 36 87 394 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Income tax (charge) credit (174 ) (10 ) 241 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (b) Effective income tax rate ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year ended March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- France 82 (128 ) (218 ) Foreign 642 321 (1,108 ) Pre-tax income (loss) 724 193 (1,326 ) Statutory income tax rate of the parent company 36.43 % 35.43 % 35.43 % Expected tax (charge ) credit (264 ) (68 ) 470 Impact of : - difference in rate of taxation - 4 (106 ) - reduced taxation of capital gain - 39 36 - recognition (non recognition) of tax loss 70 (20 ) (76 ) carryforwards - net change in estimate of tax liabilities 17 37 35 - intangible assets amortisation (20 ) (23 ) (22 ) - other permanent differences 23 21 (96 ) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Income tax ( charge ) credit (174 ) (10 ) 241 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Effective tax rate 24.0 % 5.2 % 18.2 % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The effective tax rate in fiscal year 2003 was principally affected by the non recognition of losses and the lower rate of taxation in Switzerland. In the previous year the effective tax rate was principally affected by the reduced tax rate on capital gains.
(c) Deferred tax ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- Accelerated depreciation 49 54 48 Non deductible amortisation of intangible assets 38 188 245 Profit sharing, annual leave and pension accrual not yet deductible 137 137 113 Provisions and other expenses not currently deductible 792 629 515 Contract provisions taxed in advance 54 91 110 Tax loss carryforwards, net of valuation allowance 686 1,024 1,390 Others 87 21 149 ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- Gross Deferred tax assets 1,843 2,144 2,570 ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- Netting by tax grouping or by legal entity (755 ) (658 ) (759 ) ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- Deferred tax assets 1,088 1,486 1,811 Accelerated depreciation for tax purposes (111 ) (88 ) (81 ) Contract revenues not currently taxable (229 ) (209 ) (255 ) Losses on intercompany transfers (32 ) (44 ) (34 ) Deferred income related to leasing transactions (153 ) (32 ) (60) Inventory valuation methods (67 ) (69 ) (49 ) Pensions and other adjustments not currently taxable (266 ) (76 ) (91 ) Provisions and other expenses deducted in advance - (187 ) (226 ) ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- Gross Deferred tax liabilities (858 ) (705 ) (796 ) ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- Netting by tax grouping or by legal entity 755 658 759 ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- Deferred tax liabilities (103 ) (47) (37 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Company consolidates most of its country operations for tax purposes, including in France, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany. At March 31, 2003 there were tax losses, principally relating to France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States, which aggregated 5,325 million. Included in this amount are unrecognised tax losses which aggregated approximately 810 million. The recognised losses of 4,515 million include 570 million which will expire within 5 years. d) Tax loss carryforward by maturity ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (In million) At March 31, 2003 ------------------------ Expiring within 1 year 221 2 years 66 3 years 157 4 years 507 5 years and more 2,873 Not subject to expiration 1,501 ------------------------ 5,325 Total -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 7 - Goodwill, net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Translation (In million) Net value Net value adjustments Net value March 31, March 31, Acquisitions/ and other March 31 2001 2002 Disposals Amortisation changes 2003 ----------- ----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------- Power (a) 3,515 3,524 (2 ) (198 ) 41 3,365 Transmission & Distribution * 557 564 4 (38 ) (15 ) 515 Transport (b) 451 449 158 (37 ) (12 ) 558 Marine 3 2 - - - 2 Contracting 706 - - - - - Other (c) 78 73 (10 ) (11 ) (52 ) - ----------- ----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------- Goodwill, net 5,310 4,612 150 (284 ) (38 ) 4,440 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * includes 93 million of Power Conversion goodwill integrated into the Transmission and Distribution sector as of 1 April 2002. Previous year has been restated accordingly. The gross value of goodwill was 6,011 million, 5,405 million and 5,450 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively. (a) Power The goodwill is related to the acquisition of ABB ALSTOM Power in a two step process in 1999 and 2000.0 In June 1999, ALSTOM formed a joint venture with ABB, ABB ALSTOM POWER (AAP). In setting up the ABB ALSTOM Power joint venture the Company contributed its Energy business, except the Heavy Duty Gas Turbine business, and ABB contributed substantially all of its power generation business, except for its nuclear operations, Combustion Engineering Inc., a subsidiary of ABB, and its asbestos liabilities for which ABB indemnified the Company. From July 1, 1999 to May 10, 2000 the Company owned 50% of the AAP's share capital. On May 11, 2000, ALSTOM acquired ABB's 50% shareholding in AAP, now renamed Power. Prior to that date, ALSTOM consolidated its 50% share in AAP using the proportionate consolidation method. From May 11, 2000 the accounts of Power are fully consolidated. In connection with the creation of AAP in June 1999, the Company paid to ABB an amount of 1,485 million. The acquisition cost of the second 50% share paid in May 2000 was 1,253 million. The Company has used the time interval ending with the close of the first fiscal year beginning after the May 11, 2000 acquisition to finalise the ALSTOM Power purchase price allocation. The aggregate amount of goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of ALSTOM Power in the June 1999 and May 2000 transactions was 3,953 million.
(b) Transport On October 1, 2000, the Company purchased 51% of Fiat Ferroviaria SPA now renamed ALSTOM Ferroviaria SPA for 149 million. Goodwill arising on that acquisition is 109 million. The Company has used the time interval ending with the close of first fiscal year after the acquisition of 51% of ALSTOM Ferroviaria SPA to review the purchase price allocation and recorded an adjustment of 54 million, net of deferred taxation. On April 16, 2002, the put option requiring the Company to purchase the remaining 49 % of the capital was exercised by Fiat Spa for an amount of 154 million. The resulting goodwill increase amounts to 158 million. (c) Other In September 2002, the Company sold its interest in its South African entities reducing the net goodwill by 12 million (see Note 3). At March 31, 2003, other goodwill, which substantially reflected the acquisition costs of the Company's international network activity, has been re-allocated to the sectors which the Network serves. (d) Impairment The Company requested a third party valuer to provide an independent report as part of its impairment test, performed annually, on goodwill and other intangible assets (see Note 8). Its valuation focused primarily but not exclusively on the two Sectors (Power and Transport) which account for the majority of the Company's goodwill and other intangibles. The valuation in use was determined primarily by focusing on the discounted cash flow methodology which captured the potential of the asset base to generate future profits and cash flow and was based on the following factors : - The Company's internal three year Business Plan prepared as part of its annual budget exercise at sector and segment level. - Extrapolation of the three year Business Plan over 10 years. - Terminal value at the end of the ten year period representing approximately 55% of total enterprise value. - The Company's Weighted Average Cost of Capital, post-tax, of 10.5% to 11.5%. The valuation supported the Company's opinion that its goodwill and other intangible assets were not impaired on a reporting unit basis.
Note 8 - Other intangible assets, net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Translation (In million) At At adjustments At March 31, March 31, Acquisitions/ and other March 31 2001 2002 Amortisation Disposals changes 2003 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gross value 1,242 1,289 65 - - 1,354 Depreciation (55 ) (119 ) (67 ) - - (186 ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other intangible assets, net 1,187 1,170 (2 ) - - 1,168 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other intangible assets mainly result from the allocation of the purchase price following the acquisition of ABB's 50% shareholding in Power. It includes technology, an installed base of customers and licensing agreements. Additions in the year-end March 2002 and 2003 reflect payments under a technology sharing agreement signed during the year ended 2002. Note 9- Property, plant and equipment, net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Translation (in million) Adjustments and March 31, March 31, Acquisitions/ Scope of other March 31, 2001 2002 Depreciation Disposals Consolidation changes 2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Land 379 390 - (91 ) - (13 ) 286 Buildings 1,659 1,661 56 (140 ) (2 ) (70 ) 1,505 Machinery and Equipment 3,643 3,516 129 (201 ) (6 ) (264 ) 3,174 Tools, furniture, fixtures and others 751 1,009 195 (99 ) (6 ) (152 ) 947 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gross value 6,432 6,576 380 (531 ) (14 ) (499 ) 5,912 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Land (20 ) (23 ) (2 ) 16 - 1 (8 ) Buildings (642 ) (667 ) (70 ) 76 1 22 (638 ) Machinery and Equipment (2,525 ) (2,541 ) (247 ) 175 2 196 (2,415 ) Tools, furniture, fixtures and others (457 ) (557 ) (83 ) 68 3 49 (520 ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Accumulated depreciation (3,644 ) (3,788 ) (402 ) 335 6 268 (3,581 ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Land 359 367 (2 ) (75 ) - (12 ) 278 Buildings 1,017 994 (14 ) (64 ) (1 ) (48 ) 867 Machinery and Equipment 1,118 975 (118 ) (26 ) (4 ) (68 ) 759 Tools, furniture, fixtures and others 294 452 112 (31 ) (3 ) (103 ) 427 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Net value 2,788 2,788 (22 ) (196 ) (8 ) (231 ) 2,331 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assets financed through capital lease are not capitalised (see Notes 2 and 27 (b)).
Note 10 - Equity method investments and other investments, net At March 31, 2003, in line with the accounting policies set out in note 2(b), investments in which the Company has direct or indirect control of more than 50 % of the outstanding voting shares or over which it exercises effective control, are fully consolidated. Only investments in which the Company has an equity interest of 20 % to 50 % and over which it exercises significant influence are accounted for under the equity method. (a) Equity method investments --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, % Share in (in million) 2001 2002 2003 Interest Net income -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- Guangxi Laibin Electric Power Co Ltd "Figlec" 62 65 59 40 0 Termoeléctrica del Golfo and Termoeléctrica Pe&ntidle;oles 24 72 87 49.5 0 ALSTOM S.A. de C.V., Mexico 11 10 8 49 1 Others 8 15 8 2 -------- -------- -------- ---------- Total 105 162 162 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, 2003 the Company held 40 % of the registered capital of the Chinese entity "Figlec", a company which operates the thermal Power Plant of Laibin. In the year ended March 31,2001 the Company acquired a 49.5% interest in the Termoeléctrica del Golfo and Termoeléctrica Pe&ntidle;oles, projects to build generation plants, currently under construction in Mexico. During the year further funding was provided as the construction of the generation plants proceeded. In the year ended March 31, 2001 ALSTOM sold 51 % of its shares in ALSTOM S.A. de C.V., Mexico and now holds 49 % of the share capital.
(b) Other investments, net ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31 (in million) 2001 2002 2003 ------ ------ --------------------------- % Net Net Gross Provision Net Interest ------ ------ ------- ----------- ----- --------- Ansaldo Coemsa SA (1) 29 - - - - - Ballard Generation Systems Inc (2) 40 40 - - - - Ballard Power Systems Inc (2) - - 29 (7 ) 22 2.37 % La Maquinista Vila Global (3) 28 28 - - - - A-Train AB & A-Train Invest AB 11 11 14 (9 ) 5 29 % Birecik Baraj ve Hidroelektrik Santrali Tesis ve 20 16 20 20 14 % Isletme AS Tramvia Metropolita SA 6 7 8 - 8 25 % Tramvia Metropolita del Besos (4) - - 8 - 8 25 % Others 84 37 36 (16 ) 20 ------ ------ ------- ----------- ----- TOTAL 218 139 115 (32 ) 83 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) this company has been consolidated from April 1, 2001. (2) during the year an agreement was signed to convert the 20% interest of Alstom in Ballard Generation Systems Inc ______________________________ into 2.37% interests in Ballard Power Systems Inc (corresponding to 2,500,000 shares) a company publicly traded on the Toronto Stock exchange. At March 31, 2003 the share price was 13.93 $CAD ( 8.69 ). (3) during the year, the 39 % interests in La Maquinista Vila Global have been sold for an amount of 36 million. (4) Tramvia Metropolita del Besos is just created and has no accounts available. Information on the main other investments at March 31, 2003 is based on the most recent financial statements available and is the following: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in million) Share in Net income Net Equity ---------------- ---------------- A-Train AB & A-Train Invest AB (8 ) 2 Birecik Baraj ve Hidroelektrik Santrali Tesis ve Isletme AS (14 ) 18 Tramvia Metropolita SA 0 7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 11 - Other fixed assets, net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 -------------- --------------- -------------- Long term loans, deposits and retentions (1) 776 778 814 Prepaid assets - pensions (see Note 21) 446 469 397 Others 79 79 83 -------------- --------------- -------------- Other fixed assets, net 1,301 1,326 1,294 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Include loans and cash deposits in respect of Marine vendor financing (See Note 27 (a)(2)) for total amounts of 491 million, 561 million and 510 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Note 12 - Inventories and contracts in progress, net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in million) At March 31, 2001 2002 2003 -------------- --------------- -------------- Raw materials and supplies 1,197 1,586 1,485 Work and contracts in progress 7,412 6,929 5,198 Finished products 412 361 276 -------------- --------------- -------------- Inventories, and contracts in progress, gross 9,021 8,876 6,959 Less valuation allowance (436 ) (323 ) (301 ) -------------- --------------- -------------- Inventories, and contracts in progress, net of valuation 8,585 8,553 6,658 allowances Less related customers' deposits and advances (2,536 ) (2,960 ) (2,050 ) -------------- --------------- -------------- Inventories, and contracts in progress, net of valuation allowances and related customers' deposits and advances 6,049 5,593 4,608 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note 13 - Trade receivables, net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in million) At March 31, 2001 2002 2003 -------------- --------------- -------------- Trade receivables on contracts 7,629 10,376 10,941 Other trade receivables 3,608 1,469 1,142 -------------- --------------- -------------- Trade receivables, gross (1) 11,237 11,845 12,083 Less valuation allowance (182 ) (137 ) (130 ) -------------- --------------- -------------- Trade receivables, net of valuation allowances 11,055 11,708 11,953 Less related customers' deposits and advances (4,026 ) (6,978 ) (7,098 ) -------------- --------------- -------------- Trade receivables, net of valuation allowances and related customers' deposits and advances 7,029 4,730 4,855 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) after sale of trade receivables (see Note 14)
Note 14 - Sale of trade receivables The following table shows net proceeds from sale of trade receivables : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 -------------- --------------- -------------- Trade receivables sold 1,154 1,388 357 Retained interests( Note 15) (260 ) (352 ) - -------------- --------------- -------------- Net cash proceeds from sale of trade receivables 894 1,036 357 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- During the year ended March 2001 and 2002, the Company sold trade receivables within which it irrevocably and without recourse transferred eligible receivables to third parties. Under the terms of certain of these agreements, certain receivables are pledged as credit enhancement. The retained interest in these pledged receivables remains on the consolidated balance sheet as other receivables. The Company generally continues to service, administer, and collect the receivables on behalf of the purchasers. During the year ended March 2003, the Company sold, irrevocably and without recourse, trade receivables to third parties. The Company generally continues to service, administer, and collect the receivables on behalf of the purchasers. Note 15 - Other accounts receivables, net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 -------------- --------------- -------------- Advances paid to suppliers 1,161 1,192 758 Amounts due on local part of contracts 159 241 248 Income tax and other government receivables 574 519 496 Prepaid expenses 581 446 262 Retained interests in receivables (Note 14) 260 352 - Others 80 554 501 -------------- --------------- -------------- Other accounts receivables, net 2,816 3,304 2,265 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 16 - Changes in net working capital ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes in (in million) March 31, Translation scope and March 31, 2002 Cash flow adjustments others 2003 ----------- ----------- --------------- ----------- ----------- Inventories and contract in progress, net 5,593 (415 ) (477 ) (93 ) 4,608 Trade and other receivables, net (1) 9,070 (650 ) (931 ) (12 ) 7,477 Sale of trade receivables, net (1,036 ) 661 33 (15 ) (357 ) Contract related provisions (3,215 ) (87 ) 130 (25 ) (3,197 ) Other provisions (456 ) 49 26 85 (296 ) Restructuring provisions (178 ) 29 5 6 (138 ) Customers' deposits and advances (4,221 ) 98 589 (7 ) (3,541 ) Trade and other payables (10,102 ) (162 ) 760 129 (9,375 ) ------------------------------------------------------------------- Net working capital (4,545 ) (477 ) 135 68 (4,819 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) before impact of net proceeds from sale of trade receivables Note 17 - Short-term investments ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in million) Carrying Value Within 1 year 1 to 5 years Over 5 years ----------------- ------------------ ------------------------------------- March 31, 2001 Government debt securities 8 8 - - Deposits 412 405 7 - Bonds and other debt securities 76 8 55 13 ----------------- ------------------ ------------------------------------- Total 496 421 62 13 March 31, 2002 Equity securities 31 - - 31 Deposits 121 117 4 - Bonds and other debt securities 179 18 160 1 ----------------- ------------------ ------------------------------------- Total 331 135 164 32 March 31, 2003 Government debt securities 4 1 3 - Deposits 53 53 - - Bonds and other debt securities 85 36 43 6 ----------------- ------------------ ------------------------------------- Total 142 90 46 6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The aggregate fair value is 498 million, 333 million and 143 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Note 18 - Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include cash at banks and cash on hand of 1,537 million, 1,413 million and 897 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively, and
highly liquid investments of 987 million, 491 million and 731 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Note 19 - Minority interests ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 -------------- --------------- -------------- Balance beginning of fiscal year 33 102 91 Share of net income 37 23 15 Translation adjustment - (1 ) (15 ) Dividend paid (7 ) (21 ) (1 ) Change in scope and other changes 39 (12 ) 5 -------------- --------------- -------------- Balance end of fiscal year 102 91 95 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note 20 - Provisions for risks and charges ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Translation (in million) Adjustments and At At At March 31, March 31, other March 31, 2001 2002 Additions Releases Applied changes 2003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Warranties 1,321 1,618 273 (112 ) (840 ) (124 ) 815 Penalties and claims 1,463 774 1,388 (116 ) (359 ) 79 1,766 Contract loss accruals 560 490 236 (48 ) (319 ) (14 ) 345 Other risks on contracts 414 333 113 (54 ) (75 ) (46 ) 271 Provisions on contracts 3,758 3,215 2,010 (330 ) (1,593 ) (105 ) 3,197 Restructuring 285 178 282 (14 ) (297 ) (11 ) 138 Other provisions 548 456 31 (45 ) (35 ) (111 ) 296 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total 4,591 3,849 2,323 (389 ) (1,925 ) (227 ) 3,631 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Provisions on contracts GT24/GT26 heavy duty gas turbines In July 2000, the Company announced that it had experienced significant technical difficulties in the introduction of the new GT24/GT26 heavy-duty gas turbines which are at the top end of the extensive range of gas turbine ,with respective outputs of 179 MW and 262 MW. They are among the largest individual products the Company sells and are typically sold as part of a larger power project involving other Power products. The GT24/GT26 turbines are based upon technology developed by ABB which initiated the development and marketing of the GT24/GT26 turbines in 1995, and also entered into the contracts for sales of these turbines. These turbines were based on an advanced and novel design concept. In connection with the start of commercial operation of these turbines
in 1999 and 2000, a number of significant technical problems were identified affecting all the 80 turbines previously sold. In response, the Company set in motion high-priority initiatives to design and implement modifications across the fleet. The first step of these initiatives was to de-rate the units so that they could operate in commercial service with lower efficiency and output, while the Company developed the technical solutions to allow full rating operation. The Company also embarked on a comprehensive programme to discuss and resolve any contractual issues with customers. Commercial settlements with customers were negotiated to deal with the consequences of the de-rating. Typically, what was proposed was a Performance Recovery Period of around 2-3 years, prior to implementing the life-time and performance upgrades, that the Company calls a "recovery package". This deferred the timing of the date at which provisional acceptance was achieved and related contractual remedies, including liquidated damages, apply. During that period, varying solutions were applied depending on the situation, however in general the Company replaced short life components at its costs and agreed on contractual amendments, including revised financial conditions, with each customer. The Company has already implemented some technical improvements to the turbines, which permit flexible and reliable operation of the fleet. This is confirmed by third-party statistics showing that the reliability of the GT24 fleet is above 98% in the 2002 calendar year. Operational reliability and flexibility are important ingredients for customers, particularly for those in merchant markets. The Company's confidence in the technology is based on the major progress achieved over the past 6 months. Modifications aimed at delivering enhancements to output and efficiency have been designed, validated and tested. Reduction of design risk and the validation of upgraded components have been advanced by the technology agreement with Rolls-Royce we signed in February 2002 by using their aero-engine technology and experience base. Most importantly, while the units accumulate hours in operation, it can be seen that the technology has stabilised. The 71 machines in service have accumulated, as of March 2003, over half a million operating hours at high reliability levels. The commercial situation with respect to the GT24/GT26 gas turbines is also becoming much clearer. The Company has reached commercial settlements on 61 of the 80 units and of these settlements 24 are unconditional that is to say the contracts are in the normal warranty period, and there is no obligation to upgrade or pay further penalties. Under the other 37 settlements, the Company committed to make additional upgrade improvements, either in respect of performance or the life of key components and is required to pay liquidated damages if the modified gas turbines do not meet performance criteria or if the Company does not respect the agreed time delays for the implementation of the modifications. As concerns the remaining 19 units for which no settlements have been reached, 7 are currently subject to litigation, and negotiations are ongoing or not yet started for the remainder. The orders in hand included 558 million, at 31 March 2003, in respect of a GT26 contract currently suspended on which the customer has an option for termination. If this contract does not proceed, the orders in hand will need to be adjusted accordingly.
Notwithstanding the progress achieved to date, since November 2002, the Company experienced unexpected set backs and delays, which it believes it has now resolved, in validating and testing several important components of the recovery package, notably the GT24 compressor upgrade and the 'full lifetime' blades. These delays resulted in being unable to respect the duration of the recovery periods agreed with some of its customers under applicable agreements, including under conditional settlement agreements, prior to the implementation of the recovery package with the expected improvements in performance, efficiency and life of key components. In the current state of the energy wholesale markets, customers do not have the incentive to accept these machines. These delays therefore mean significantly increased exposure as customers are less inclined to agree to further extensions of the recovery periods and are invoking penalties and liquidated damages. The Company also incurs additional costs because it has been forced to shut down the machines more frequently to replace short life components at our expense. The Company's previously expected targets were therefore not achievable in the current context. As a consequence, the Company has revised its analysis of the residual financial impact of the GT24/GT26 issue on a contract by contract basis, which it now estimates at 1,530 million net. This amount reflects management's best estimate of the remaining gross exposure in March 2003 of 1,984 million, on which it expects to mitigate 454 million by taking numerous actions to reduce its estimated gross exposure. In fiscal year 2000, ABB ALSTOM Power, of which the Company owned 50% at that time, recorded a total of 519 million of provisions in accrued costs in respect of the GT 24/GT 26 gas turbines. In fiscal year 2001, the Company recorded a total of 1,068 million of provisions and accrued contract costs related to the turbines. In fiscal year 2002, an additional 1,075 million of provisions and accrued contract cost were recorded relating to the turbines. 1,440 million of provisions and accrued contract costs was retained at 31 March 2002 in respect of these turbines. After application of 1,070 million during fiscal year 2003, the remaining amount of provisions was 370 million. To cover the total revised net exposure, an additional provision of 1,160 million has been provided during fiscal year 2003. As a result, the total provisions and accrued contract costs at 31 March 2003 in respect of these turbines were 1,530 million. This provision does not take into account interest to be paid to customers (cost of carry), the cost of which will be recorded when it falls due. Actual costs incurred may exceed the amounts of provisions and accrued contract costs retained at March 31, 2003 because of a number of factors, including cost overruns or delays the Company may incur in the manufacture of modified components, the implementation of modifications or the delivery of modified turbines and the outcome of claims or litigation made by or against the Company. UK trains In 1997, shortly after the privatisation of the British rail industry, the Company received five orders for a total of 119 new trains with an aggregate value of 670 million. At the end of March 2002, the Company reported that difficulties had been encountered on these UK Regional Trains, and 29 of the 119 trains remained to be delivered out. Measures taken to address the various technical and contractual issues enabled the Company to work with the operators
and the rail authorities to deliver all but one of the 119 trains ordered. Settlements have recently been agreed with customers under which the Company is obliged to implement programmes to ensure that all fleets achieve agreed levels of in-service reliability, which are on going and leading to additional costs. These commitments, which, in some instances, involve commitments for a number of years, have been provided for in fiscal year 2003. On the West Coast Main Line "WCML" contract, the project experienced major delays due to changing specifications and the high level of uncertainty regarding upgrading of the WCML route and infrastructure. Nevertheless, trains are currently being delivered at the rate of 2 a month in line with a revised programme agreed with our customer and the railway authorities. In fiscal year 2003, the Company provided for additional provisions of 140 million to cover the future costs of the continuing improvement programme on the Regional Trains and to complete the WCML contract. Actual costs incurred may exceed the amounts of provisions and accrued contract costs retained at March 31, 2003 because of a number of factors, including cost overruns, delays the Company may incur in the manufacture or delivery of the trains or of the outcome of claims made by or against the Company which are, at such an early stage, that no meaningful assessment of amounts which may become due to or by the Company is possible. Restructuring provisions During the year ended March 31, 2003, restructuring expenditure amounted to 297 million. New plans were adopted during the period in Power, Transmission & Distribution and Transport, for which provisions have been created. At March 31, 2003, restructuring and redundancy provisions mainly relate to Power and Transmission & Distribution Sectors. During the 12 month period ended March 31, 2002, restructuring expenditure amounted to 344 million, principally in the Power, Transmission & Distribution and Transport Sectors. New plans were adopted during the period in Transport for which provisions have been created during the year. At March 31, 2002, restructuring and redundancy provisions mainly relate to Power, Transmission and Distribution and Power Conversion Sectors. During the 12 month period ended March 31, 2001, restructuring expenditure amounted to 605 million, principally in the Power, Transmission & Distribution and Transport sectors. New plans were adopted during the period mainly in Transport for which provisions have been created during the year. The 306 million of change in scope of consolidation was mainly explained by the full consolidation of Power since May 11, 2000. At March 31, 2001, restructuring and redundancy provisions mainly related to Power and Transmission & Distribution Sectors. Other provisions Other provisions include 144 million and 140 million at March 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively to cover Marine vendor financing exposure (Note 25 (b)).
Note 21 -- Retirement, termination and post-retirement benefits The Company provides various types of retirement, termination benefits and post retirement benefits (including healthcare benefits and medical cost) to its employees. The type of benefits offered to an individual employee is related to local legal requirements as well as the historical operating practices of the specific subsidiaries. Termination benefits are generally lump sum payments based upon an individual's years of credited service and annualised salary at retirement or termination of employment. Pension benefits are generally determined using a formula which uses the employee's years of credited service and average final earnings. Most defined-benefit pension liabilities are funded through separate pension funds. Pension plan assets related to funded plans are invested mainly in equity and debt securities. Other supplemental defined-benefit pension plans sponsored by the Company for certain employees are funded from the Company's assets as they become due. Change in benefit obligation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pension Benefit Other Benefits Total (in million) At March 31, At March 31, At March 31, 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Benefit Obligation at Beginning of year (2,985) (3,865) (3,527) (80) (206) (242) (3,065) (4,071) (3,769) Service cost (97) (99) (107) (2) (3) (2) (99) (102) (109) Interest cost (200) (205) (196) (14) (16) (15) (214) (221) (211) Plan participants (20) (19) (20) - - - (20) (19) (20) contributions Amendments - (16) 1 - - - - (16) 1 Business Combinations / (423) 359 (3) (109) - - (532) 359 (3) disposals (1) Curtailment - 9 12 - - - - 9 12 Settlements 4 - 91 - - - 4 - 91 Actuarial (loss) gain (353) 154 (97) - (31) (12) (353) 123 (109) Benefits paid 169 178 149 14 17 17 183 195 166 Foreign currency translation 40 (23) 358 (15) (3) 50 25 (26) 408 Benefit Obligation at end of Year (3,865) (3,527) (3,339) (206) (242) (204) (4,071) (3,769) (3,543) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (1) In the year ended March 31, 2001, the business combination relates mainly to the full integration of Power In the year ended March 31,2002, the Business combination relates mainly to the purchase and the integration of Railcare Limited and to the sale of GT Railways Maintenance Limited and Contracting sector
Change in plan assets --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pension Benefit Other Benefits Total ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------- (in million) At March 31, At March 31, At March 31, 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 ------- ---------- ------- ------- --------- ------- ------- --------- ------- Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year 3,248 3,322 2,712 - - - 3,248 3,322 2,712 Actual return on plan assets (34 ) (165 ) (282 ) - - - (34 ) (165 ) (282 ) Company contributions 61 81 73 - - 8 61 81 73 Plan participant contributions 20 19 23 - - - 20 19 23 Business Combinations /disposals (1) 223 (444 ) (30 ) - - - 223 (444 ) (30 ) Settlements - - (75 ) - - - - - (75 ) Benefits paid (145 ) (122 ) (95 ) - - - (145 ) (122 ) (95 ) Foreign currency translation (51 ) 21 (314 ) - - - (51 ) 21 (314 ) ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------- Fair value of plan assets at end of year 3,322 2,712 2,012 - - - 3,322 2,712 2,012 Funded status of the plan (543 ) (815 ) (1,327 ) (206 ) (242 ) (204 ) (749 ) (1,057 ) (1,531 ) Unrecognised actuarial loss (gain) 211 506 933 (1 ) 34 34 210 540 967 Unrecognised actuarial prior Service cost (77 ) 18 11 - - (1 ) (77) 18 10 Unrecognised actuarial transition - (26 ) (24 ) 4 - 3 4 (26 ) (21 ) ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------- (Accrued) prepaid benefit cost (409 ) (317 ) (407 ) (203 ) (208 ) (168 ) (612 ) (525 ) (575 ) ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------- Of which: Accrued pensions and retirement benefits (855 ) (786 ) (804 ) (203 ) (208 ) ( 168 ) (1,058 ) (994 ) (972 ) Prepaid assets (Note 11) 446 469 397 - - - 446 469 397 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) In the year ended March 31, 2001, the business combination relates mainly to the full integration of Power In the year ended March 31,2002, the Business combination relates mainly to the purchase and the integration of Railcare Limited and to the sale of GT Railways Maintenance Limited and Contracting sector. Components of plan assets ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year ended March 31, 2002 2003 % ------------------ -------------------- -------------------- Equities 1,646 1,156 57.5 Bonds 827 641 31.8 Properties 142 129 6.4 Others 97 86 4.3 ------------------ -------------------- -------------------- Total 2,712 2,012 100 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The actuarial assumptions used vary by business unit and country, based upon local considerations :
Assumptions (weighted average rates) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pension Benefit Other Benefits ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ Year ended March 31, Year ended March 31, 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ Discount rate 6.23% 6.14% 5.90 % 7.5% 7.25% 6.75% Rate of compensation increase 4.13% 3.31% 3.28% N/A N/A N/A Expected return on plan assets 6.93% 7.79% 7.57% N/A N/A N/A --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following table shows the amounts of net periodic benefit cost for each of the three years ended March, 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pension Benefit Other Benefits ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Year ended March 31, Year ended March 31, 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Service cost 97 99 107 2 3 2 Expected interest cost 200 205 196 14 16 15 Expected return on plan assets (227 ) (208 ) (193 ) - - Amortisation of unrecognised prior service (6 ) (8 ) 2 - - - cost Amortisation of actuarial net loss (gain) 14 11 16 - 1 Curtailments/Settlements (4 ) (32 ) 9 - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Net periodic benefit cost 74 67 137 16 19 18 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Company's health care plans, disclosed in other benefits are generally contributory with participants' contributions adjusted annually. The healthcare trend rate is assumed to be 10 % in the year ended March, 31, 2003 and 8% thereafter. In addition to the net periodic benefit cost disclosed above, the company charged in pensions costs contributions related to schemes mixing defined benefits and defined contributions for 32 million together with multi-employer contributions for 27 million. The total of pension and other post retirement benefit costs for each of the three year ended March 31, 2003 are shown in Note 4 - Other income (expenses), net. The total cash outflow of the 12 month period ended March 31, 2003 was 203 million.
Note 22 - Financial Debt (a) Analysis by nature --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, ------------------------------------------------ (in million) 2001 2002 2003 -------------- -------------- --------------- Redeemable preference shares (1) - - 205 Subordinated notes (2) - - 250 Bonds (3) 1,200 1,200 1,200 Syndicated loans (4) 200 1,550 2,627 Bilateral loans 633 283 358 Bank overdraft and other facilities 979 779 266 Commercial paper (5) 1,611 455 83 Accrued interest 30 33 50 -------------- -------------- --------------- Total 4,653 4,300 5,039 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Future receivables securitised, net (6) 1,578 1,735 1,292 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Financial debt 6,231 6,035 6,331 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Long-term portion 2,352 3,644 3,647 Short-term portion 3,879 2,391 2,684 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) On 30 March 2001, a wholly owned subsidiary of ALSTOM Holdings issued perpetual, cumulative, non voting, preference shares for a total amount of 205 million. The preference shares have no voting rights. They are not redeemable, except at the exclusive option of the issuer, in whole but not in part, on or after the 5th anniversary of the issue date or at any time in case of certain limited specific pre identified events. Included in those events, are changes in tax laws and the issuance of new share capital. In July 2002 an issue of shares was made triggering the contractual redemption of the preferred shares at 31 March 2006 at a price equal to par value together with dividends accrued, but not yet paid. As a result of the triggering event during the year, this instrument has been re-classified as long term debt and its related interest has been classified as interest and shown as Net interest income (expense) (see Note 5). (2) The Company issued, on September 2000, 250 million Auction Rate Coupon Undated Subordinated Notes. In March 2003, the terms of redemption were amended and the notes are now redeemable in September 2006. They retain their subordinated nature and rank "pari passu" with holders of other subordinated indebtedness. Interest is payable quarterly, at variable rates based on EURIBOR.
As a result of the change in the terms of redemption during the year, they are presented as financial debt at March 31, 2003. (3) On July 26, 1999, the Company issued bonds for a principal amount of 650 million with a 7 year maturity, listed on the Paris and Luxembourg Stock Exchanges, bearing a 5 % coupon and to be redeemed at par on July 26, 2006. On February 6, 2001, the Company issued bonds for a principal amount of 550 million with a 3 year maturity, listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, bearing a 5.625 % coupon and to be redeemed at par on February 6, 2004. (4) Syndicated loans At March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, in addition to drawn down amounts of syndicated loans, the Company has unused confirmed credit lines of 1,723 million, 1,660 million and 600 million (bridge facility maturing 15 December 2003). In March 2003 an agreement was signed with a consortium of banks "the lenders" to extend until January 21, 2004 the maturity of a revolving credit facility of 400 million and two bilateral loans totalling 75 million out of the 358 million of bilateral loans at March 31, 2003 that were originally to mature in March and April 2003. A new bridge facility of 600 million maturing 15 December 2003 was also signed under similar terms and conditions. Both extended and bridge facilities are subject to compliance with new financial covenants, which have also replaced existing covenants in the two other existing syndicated revolving credit facilities (totalling commitments of 1, 250 million and 977 million respectively). They are unsecured and rank "pari passu" with the other revolving facilities. While the bridge facility and the extended facilities documentation were signed on 25 March 2003, they were further conditioned by the formalisation of amendments in particular with respect to financial ratios in some other financing arrangements of the Company. Those amendments were finalised and documented in the early part of April 2003. The bridge facility and the extended facilities are repayable and cancellable upon receipt of proceeds from disposals subject to certain thresholds, with the bridge facility repayable prior to the extended facilities. Subsequent to the year-end, the Company signed binding agreements to dispose its industrial turbines businesses for expected net cash proceeds of approximately 950 million. Other assets disposals which occur after 31 March 2003 generated net cash proceeds of 138 million (see Note 31 "Post balance sheet events"). The newly extended credit facilities of 475 million and the 600 million new bridge facility are immediately repayable if the Company fails to meet its financial covenants in the coming financial year set out below : - "Total debt" defined as the sum of the gross financial debt and the net amount of sale of trade receivables (see Note 14) shall be tested on the last day of each
month until maturity and shall not exceed at respectively 31 March 2003 and 30 September 2003 amounts of 7,000 million¹ and 6,800 million. At March 31, 2003, the "total debt" amounts to 6,688 million. - "Economic debt" defined as the sum of the net financial debt and the net amount of sale of trade receivables ( see Note 14) shall be tested on the last day of each month until maturity and shall not exceed at respectively 31 March 2003 and 30 September 2003 amounts of 5,300 million, 5,500 million. At March 31, 2003, the "economic debt" amounts to 4,918 million. - "Consolidated net worth" defined as the sum of shareholders' equity and minority interests shall not be lower at respectively 31 March 2003 and 30 September 2003 than 800 million and 500 million. At March 31, 2003, the "consolidated net worth" amounts to 900 million. Financial covenants mentioned above also apply to the 1,250 million and 977 million syndicated revolving credit facilities. Similar ratios are applicable until maturity of the credit facilities. At March 31, 2004, "total debt" shall not exceed 4,800 million, "Economic Debt" shall not exceed 3,600 million and "Consolidated Net worth" shall not be lower than 500 million. Interest cover, the ratio between EBITDA² and consolidated net financial expenses(3), shall not be lower than 1.8 at March 31, 2004. Differing ratios apply in the periods up to the last maturity in 2006. In addition to these financial covenants, under the 475 million newly extended credit lines and the 600 million new bridge facility, the Company's lenders may request the early repayment of all or part of these lines if at the shareholders' meeting to be held on July 2, 2003 the shareholders do not approve resolutions authorising the Board of Directors to increase the share capital. (5) The total authorised commercial paper program is 2,500 million, availability being subject to market conditions (6) The Company sold, in several transactions, the right to receive payment from certain customers for future receivables for a net amount of 1,578 million, 1,735 million and 1,292 million at March 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 respectively. Within the total of 1,292 million at March 31, 2003 : - 581 million correspond to securitised Marine transactions of which: - 518 million relate to the sale of two cruise-ships to two customers. These transactions, which substantially limit the Company's exposure --------------- (1) Additional flexibility of 500 million is granted at the two month-ends following this date. (2) EBITDA is defined as Earnings Before Interest and Tax plus depreciation and amortisation as set out in Consolidated Statements of Cash flow less goodwill amortisation and less capital gain on disposal of investments (see Note 4) (3) Consolidated net financial expenses are defined as net interest income plus securitisation expenses (see Note 5)
during the cruise-ship construction period, provide for limited recourse only in the event of customer default prior to the delivery of the cruise-ships to cover any eventual losses of the investors upon the resale of the cruise-ship in question, subject to a maximum of 82 million in respect of one cruise-ship sold to one customer and, a maximum of 84 million in respect of one cruise-ship sold to another customer. These transactions benefit from a security mortgage on the ships until delivery and final payment by the customer. - 63 million relate to the sale of future receivables from another customer. - 711 million correspond to securitised Transport transactions covering eleven contracts with three customers.
(b) Analysis by maturity and interest rate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Short Term Long Term ---------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Average interest (in million) Less than After 5 rate TOTAL 1 year 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years years (1) ------- --------- ------------------------------------------- ----------------- Redeemable preference shares 205 - - 205 - - - 6.3% Subordinated notes 250 250 4.9% - - - - - Bonds 1,200 550 - 650 - - 4.7% Syndicated loans 2,627 654 1,250 - 723 - - 3.7% Bilateral loans 358 75 - 50 33 200 3.6% - Bank overdraft and other 266 238 3 3 3 3 16 4.7% facilities Commercial Paper 83 83 - - - - - 3.5% Accrued interests 50 50 ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------ Total 5,039 1,650 1,253 258 1,659 203 16 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Future receivables securitised, 1,292 1,034 254 4 - - - 5.0% net (2) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Financial debt 6,331 2,684 1,507 262 1,659 203 16 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) including the effects of interest rate swaps associated with the underlying debt. (2) the reimbursement of which will come from the direct payment of the customer to the investor to whom the Company sold the right to receive the payment -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, 2003 (in million) Amount before Amount after Hedging Hedging (1) --------------- --------------- Financial debt at fixed rate 1,315 962 Financial debt at floating rate (2) 5,016 5,369 --------------- --------------- Total 6,331 6,331 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) after taking into account 353 million of interest swaps converting the financial debt at fixed rates into variable rates (see Note 29 (b)) (2) Floating interest rates are based on EURIBOR and LIBOR
(c) Analysis by currency ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At 31 March (in million) 2001 2002 2003 --------------- --------------- -------------- Euro 5,496 5,676 6,205 US dollar 106 125 22 Swiss franc 146 - - Mexican peso - 59 - Pound sterling 197 24 3 Other currencies 286 151 101 --------------- --------------- -------------- Total 6,231 6,035 6,331 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note 23 - Accrued contract costs and other payables -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 -------------- -------------- -------------- Accrued contract cost (contract completion) 1,641 2,725 2,822 Staff and associated costs 751 910 888 Income taxes 259 158 192 Other taxes 294 239 254 Others 591 506 590 -------------- -------------- -------------- Accrued contract costs and other payables 3,536 4,538 4,746 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note 24 - Customers deposits and advances During the year the Company's marine subsidiary entered into a construction finance contract in respect of one ship presently under construction. Under the terms of this contract finance is made available against commitments to suppliers and to work in progress. The amounts financed are secured against the ship involved and the future receivable is collaterised by way of a guarantee of the pre financing. Cash received has firstly been applied against amounts included in trade receivables then against work in progress and where commitments made have not yet become work in progress cash is shown as part of customer deposits and advances. At 31 March 2003 cash received on this pre-financing was 453 million of which 434 million has been applied and the remaining balance of 19 million included in customers deposits and advances.
Note 25 - Financing arrangements (a) Special purpose leasing entities At March 31, 2003, the Company has interests in eight special purpose leasing entities owning seven cruise-ships and sixty locomotives. Because the Company has no shares in these entities, they are not consolidated. Four special purposes entities are active at March 31, 2003. During the year ended March 31, 2002 the leasing arrangements of four special purpose leasing entities owning four cruise-ships were re-organised following the bankruptcy of Renaissance Cruises which went into Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in September 2001 and for which the Company had previously built and delivered eight cruise-ships. The four cruise-ships owned by four special purpose leasing entities which were afterwards put into liquidation were subsequently sold to separate subsidiaries of Cruiseinvest L.L.C, a subsidiary of Cruiseinvest (Jersey) Ltd, an entity in which the Company has no shares. Consequently, at March 31, 2003, the Company has four ongoing leasing arrangements three relating to Marine and one relating to Transport. The summarised condensed balance sheets is as follows : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in million) At March 31, 2001 2002 2003 --------------- --------------- ---------------- Assets Restricted long-term cash 92 88 85 Long-term receivables, net (*) 1,663 923 770 Advance payments 42 10 10 Other assets 61 43 41 --------------- --------------- ---------------- Total 1,858 1,064 906 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Liabilities Bank borrowings (1) 1,399 634 510 Alstom financing (2) 218 270 266 Customers retentions 241 160 130 --------------- --------------- ---------------- Total 1,858 1,064 906 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (*) Long-term receivables, net are presented net of unearned income that amounts to 812 million, 552 million and 457 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively. The decrease of total balance sheet in fiscal year 2003 is mainly due to the appreciation of Euro against US dollar during the period.
(1) Bank borrowings Marine Borrowing of one entity totalling 137 million, 123 million and 111 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively is guaranted by the Company. In the event of the guarantee of repayment of borrowings being called, the Company's position is secured on the underlying assets of the entity. The Company's exposure is disclosed in Note 27 (a) (2) "vendor financing". Borrowings of two entities totalling 281 million, 207 million and 96 million at March, 31 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively are guaranteed by Coface, a French state owned export credit insurance company, up to a maximum of 95% of their nominal value. The Company has no exposure in respect of these borrowings. Transport Borrowings of the entity involving sixty locomotives totally 251 million, 287 million and 252 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively are guaranted by a Western European state with no recourse to the members of the entity in case of default. The Company has no exposure in respect of these borrowings. (2) Alstom borrowings Marine Two leasing entities are also directly financed by the Company for an amount of 218 million, 270 million and 223 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively, that will increase to a maximum of approximately 240 million in 2005. This financing is secured by ship mortgages. The Company's exposure is disclosed in Note 27 (a) (2) "vendor financing". Transport The entity involving sixty locomotives is also directly financed by the Company for an amount of 43 million at March 31, 2003 , that will increase to a maximum of approximately 63 million in 2009. This financing is guaranted by a Western European state. The Company has no exposure in respect of these borrowings. As a consequence, at March 31, 2003, the Company's vendor financing exposure in respect of these entities is 351 million (see Note 27 (a) (2) "vendor financing").
(b) Cruiseinvest The ultimate owner of Cruiseinvest (Jersey) Ltd, a company, incorporated on November 12, 2001, is a Jersey charitable trust. The main assets of this structure through subsidiaries of Cruiseinvest LLC are six cruise-ships initially delivered to Renaissance, the ownership of which was reorganised following the bankruptcy of Renaissance Cruises, including the four cruise-ships referred to in Note 25(a), and acquired after a sealed bid auction process. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in million) At March 31, 2002 (*) 2003 (*) ------------------ ------------------ Cruise ships at cost 1,026 907 Other assets 26 6 ------------------ ------------------ Total assets 1,052 913 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Retained earnings - (78 ) Bank borrowings (1) 857 804 Alstom limited recourse notes (including interests) (2) 195 169 Alstom credit line (3) - 15 Other payables - 3 ------------------ ------------------ Total liabilities 1,052 913 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (*) Unaudited and based on available figures provided by Cruiseinvest at December 31, 2001 and 2002. (1) The Company guaranteed some of the financing arrangements up to US $ 173 million ( 197 million at March 31, 2002 and 159 million at March 31, 2003) of which US$ 84 million ( 96 million at March 31, 2002 and 77 million at March 31, 2003) are supported by a cash deposit. (2) The Company purchased US $ 170 million ( 195 million at March 31, 2002 and 156 million at March 31, 2003) of subordinated limited recourse notes issued by Cruiseinvest (Jersey) Ltd. These subordinated limited recourse notes are composed of a series of five notes bearing interest at 6 % per annum payable half yearly in arrears, and maturing in December 2011. The right of the Company as note-holder is limited to amounts that shall become payable up to the value of the notes. Related interests due and accrued amounted to 13 million at March 31, 2003. (3) The Company provided Cruiseinvest LLC with a 40 million line of credit, of which 15 million has been drawn down at March 31, 2003. The decrease of total balance sheet in fiscal year 2003 is mainly due to the appreciation of Euro against US dollar during the period. As current economic environment negatively affects the market to which the ships are dedicated, an impairment test of the carrying value of the ships was needed. Based on current known facts and circumstances and cash flow forecasts based on the existing leasing arrangements of Cruiseinvest and on assumptions as to leases renewal and ships sales, the Company considers that its provision of 140 million at March 31, 2003 ( 144 million at March 31, 2002) is adequate to cover the probable risk.
At March 31, 2003, the Company's vendor financing exposure in respect of Cruiseinvest is 368 million, corresponding to the limited recourse note including interest of 169 million, the total commitment concerning the line of credit of 40 million and 159 million of guarantees given on borrowings (see Note 27 (a) (2) "Vendor financing"). Note 26 - Sector and geographic data a) Sector data The Company is managed through Sectors of activity and determined its reportable segments accordingly. During fiscal year 2003, the Company was organised in four Sectors: o The Power Sector offers a wide range of products and services related to electrical power generation including design, manufacture, construction, turnkey project management and related services. o The Transmission & Distribution Sector offers equipment and customer support for the transmission and distribution of electrical energy. From 1 April 2002 Power Conversion has been integrated within the Transmission & Distribution Sector and provides solutions for manufacturing processes and supplies high-performance products including motors, generators, propulsion systems for Marine and drives for a variety of industrial applications. o The Transport Sector offers equipment, systems, and customer support for rail transportation including passenger trains, locomotives, signalling equipment, rail components and service. o The Marine Sector designs and manufactures cruise and other speciality ships. The composition of the Sectors may vary from time to time. As part of any change in the composition of its sectors, Company management may also modify the manner in which it evaluates and measures profitability. The Company evaluates internally the Sectors performance on a number of measures including Operating Income and Earnings Before Interest and Tax. Some units, not material to the sector presentation, have been transferred between sectors. The revised segment composition has not been reflected on a retroactive basis as the Company determined it was not practicable to do so. From April 1, 2003 the Power Sector is reorganised into three new Sectors, Power Turbo-Systems, Power Service and Power Environment and future reporting will reflect this Sector re-organisation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Orders received At March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 ------------- -------------- ------------- Power 11,502 11,033 8,602 Transmission & Distribution(1) 3,619 3,877 3,732 Transport 5,558 6,154 6,412 Marine 1,835 462 163 Contracting 2,840 909 - Corporate & others (2) 373 251 214 ------------- -------------- ------------- TOTAL 25,727 22,686 19,123 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sales Year ended March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 ------------- -------------- ------------- Power 12,040 12,976 10,901 Transmission & Distribution(1) 3,409 3,814 3,605 Transport 4,400 4,413 5,072 Marine 1,841 1,240 1,568 Contracting 2,485 759 - Corporate & others (2) 375 251 205 ------------- -------------- ------------- TOTAL 24,550 23,453 21,351 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating income (loss) Year ended March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 ------------- -------------- ------------- Power 448 572 (690 ) Transmission & Distribution(1) 275 226 227 Transport 266 101 49 Marine 80 47 24 Contracting 123 30 - Corporate & others (2) (41) (35) (44 ) ------------- -------------- ------------- TOTAL 1,151 941 (434 ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EBIT Year ended March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 ------------- -------------- ------------- Power 313 271 (1,063 ) Transmission & Distribution(1) 196 122 81 Transport 171 83 (40 ) Marine 76 32 12 Contracting 219 28 - Corporate & others (2) (44) (49 ) (46 ) ------------- -------------- ------------- TOTAL 931 487 (1,056 ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Capital employed (3) At March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 ------------- -------------- ------------- Power 2,661 3,012 2,383 Transmission & Distribution(1) 1,042 1,044 963 Transport 1,093 1,041 805 Marine (157 ) 100 (343 ) Contracting 1,268 - - Corporate & others (2) 918 1,491 1,208 ------------- -------------- ------------- TOTAL 6,825 6,688 5,016 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Power Conversion is integrated into the Transmission and Distribution sector as of 1 April 2002. Previous years comparative figures have been restated accordingly. (2) Corporate & others include all units accounting for Corporate costs, the International Network and the overseas entities in Australia, New Zealand , South Africa (before disposal) and India, that are not allocated to Sectors. (3) Capital employed is defined as the closing position of the sum of Fixed assets net and current assets (excluding net proceeds of sale of trade receivables) less current liabilities and provisions for risks and charges. b) Geographic data -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sales by country of destination Year ended March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 ------------- -------------- ------------- Europe 11,078 9,313 9,219 North America 6,863 6,255 4,719 South & Central America 952 1,439 1,534 Asia / Pacific 3,957 4,521 3,727 Middle East / Africa 1,700 1,925 2,152 ------------------------------------------ TOTAL 24,550 23,453 21,351 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sales by country of origin Year ended March 31, (in million) 2001 2002 2003 ------------- -------------- ------------- Europe 16,412 14,755 14,762 North America 5,414 5,623 3,935 South & Central America 598 683 601 Asia / Pacific (*) 1,771 2,050 1,833 Middle East / Africa (*) 355 342 220 ------------- -------------- ------------- TOTAL 24,550 23,453 21,351 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (*) India and Pakistan previously included in Middle East are now included in Asia / Pacific. Previous years have been restated accordingly. Net sales of 3,049 million (12.4 %), 3,258 (13.9 %) and 3,300 (15.5 %) in the years ended March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively, are obtained from a group of state owned companies, independently managed, the largest of which represented 1.1 %, 2.4 % and 4.2 % in the years ended March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively. No client represented more than 10% of net sales in any of the three years.
Note 27 - Off balance sheet commitments and other obligations a) Off balance sheet commitments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in million) At March 31, 2001 2002 2003 ---------- ---------- ---------- Guarantees related to contracts (1) 14,156 11,451 9,465 Guarantees related to Vendor financing (2) 913 932 749 Discounted notes receivable 2 18 11 Commitments to purchase fixed assets 22 8 7 Other guarantees - 58 94 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total 15,093 12,467 10,326 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Guarantees related to contracts In accordance with industry practice guarantees of performance under contracts with customers and under offers on tenders are given. Such guarantees can, in the normal course, extend from the tender period until the final acceptance by the customer, and the end of the warranty period and may include guarantees on project completion, of contract specific defined performance criteria or plant availability. The guarantees are provided by banks or surety companies by way of performance bonds, surety bonds and letters of credit and are normally for defined amounts and periods. The Company provides a counter indemnity to the bank or surety company. The projects for which the guarantees are given are regularly reviewed by management and when it becomes probable that payments pursuant to performance guarantees will require to be made accruals are recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statement at that time. Guarantees given by parent or group companies relating to liabilities included in the consolidated accounts are not included. (2) Vendor financing The Company has provided financial support, referred to as vendor financing, to financial institutions and granted financing to certain purchasers of its cruise-ships for ship-building contracts signed up to fiscal year 1999 and other equipment. The total "vendor financing" was 1,259 million at March 31, 2003 ( 1,493 million at March 31, 2002).
The table below sets forth the breakdown of the outstanding vendor financing by Sector at March 31, 2002 and March 31, 2003 : --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, 2002 At March 31, 2003 (in million) Balance Off balance Balance Off balance sheet(1) sheet(2) Total sheet(1) sheet(2) Total --------- ------------- ---------- ----------- ------------- -------- Marine 561 483 1,044 510 423 933 Cruiseinvest/ 291 141 432 261 107 368 Renaissance Leasing entities 270 123 393 223 128 351 Others - 219 219 26 188 214 Transport - 416 416 - 317 317 European metro operator - 289 289 - 257 257 Others - 127 127 - 60 60 Power - 29 29 - 5 5 T&D - 4 4 - 4 4 --------- ------------- ---------- ----------- ------------- -------- TOTAL 561 932 1,493 510 749 1,259 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Balance sheets items are included in "other fixed assets" (Note 11) (2) Off-balance sheet figures correspond to the total guarantees and commitments, net of related cash deposits, which are shown as balance-sheet items. The decrease of the total "vendor financing" is mainly due to the appreciation of Euro against US dollar and British pound during the period. Marine Cruiseinvest / Renaissance At March 31, 2003, the "vendor financing" granted to Cruiseinvest relating to Renaissance Cruises amounted to 368 million ( 432 million at March 31, 2002) as described is Note 25 (b). Leasing entities At March 31, 2003, the Company finances and guarantees the financing of three special leasing entities relating to three cruise-ships for an amount of 351 million ( 393 million at March 31, 2002) as described in Note 25 (a). Other ships The Company has guaranteed the financing arrangements of three cruise-ships and two high speed ferries delivered to three customers for an amount of 214 million at March 31, 2003 ( 219 million at March 31, 2002). One of these guarantees is supported by a cash deposit amounting to 26 million at March 31, 2003. The provision retained in respect of Marine Vendor financing is 140 million at March 31, 2003 ( 144 million at March 31, 2002).
Transport Guarantees given as part of vendor financing arrangements in Transport Sector amount to 317 million at 31 March 2003( 416 million at 31 March 2002). Included in this amount are guarantees given as part of a leasing scheme involving a major European metro operator as described in Note 27 (b). If the metro operator decides in year 2017 not to extend the initial period the Company has guaranteed to the lessors that the value of the trains and associated equipment at the option date should not be less than GBP 177 million ( 289 million at 31 March 2002 and 257 million at 31 March 2003). Other Sectors Other guarantees totalling 9 million at 31 March 2003 ( 33 million at 31 March 2002) have been given. There has been no default by any of the concerned entities under the underlying agreements. b) Capital and operating lease obligations --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in million) Total Within 1 year 1 to 5 years Over 5 years ------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Long term rental (1) 667 6 48 613 Capital leases obligation (2) 278 31 93 154 Operating leases (3) 534 90 225 219 ------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Total 1,479 127 366 986 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Long term rental Pursuant to a contract signed in 1995 with a major European metro operator, the Company has sold 103 trains and associated equipment to two leasing entities. These entities have entered into an agreement by which the Company leases back the trains and associated equipment from the lessors for a period of 30 years. The trains are made available for use by the metro operator for an initial period of 20 years, extendible at the option of the operator for a further ten year period. The trains are being maintained and serviced by the Company. These commitments are in respect of the full lease period and are covered by payments due to the Company from the metro operator. If this lease was capitalised it would increase long-term assets and long-term debt by 754 million, 757 million and 667 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively. (2) Capital leases
If capital leases had been capitalised, it would increase long term assets (property plant and equipment) by 54 million, 112 million and 212 million, increase long term financial debt by 55 million, 119 million and 216 million and decrease of shareholder's equity of 1 million, 7 million and 4 million at March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. (3) Operating leases A number of these operating leases have renewal options. Rent expense was 110 million in the year ended 31 March 2003. No material commitments are omitted in this note in accordance with current accounting rules. Note 28 - Contingencies - Litigation The Company is engaged in several legal proceedings, mostly contract disputes that have arisen in the normal course of business. Contract disputes, often involving claims for contract delays or additional work, are common in the areas in which the Company operates, particularly for large, long-term projects. In some cases, the amounts claimed against us in these proceedings and disputes are significant ranging up to 337 million. Amounts retained in respect of litigation, considered as reasonable estimates of probable liabilities are included in provisions for risks and charges and accrued contract costs. Actual costs incurred may exceed the amount of provisions for litigation because of a number of factors including the inherent uncertainties of the outcome of litigation. - Environmental, health and safety The Company is subject to a broad range of environmental laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. These laws and regulations impose increasingly stringent environmental protection standards regarding, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, the use and handling of hazardous waste or materials, waste disposal practices and the remediation of environmental contamination. These standards expose the Company to the risk of substantial environmental costs and liabilities, including liabilities associated with divested assets and past activities. In most of the jurisdictions in which operations take place, industrial activities are subject to obtaining permits, licenses or/and authorisations, or to prior notification. Most facilities must comply with these permits, licenses or authorisations and are subject to regular administrative inspections. Significant amounts are invested to ensure that activities are conducted in order to reduce the risks of impacting the environment and capital expenditures are regularly incurred in connection with environmental compliance requirements. Although involved in the remediation of contamination of certain properties and other sites, the Company believes that its facilities are in compliance with its operating permits and that operations are generally in compliance with environmental laws and regulations.
The outcome of environmental matters cannot be predicted with certainty and there can be no assurance that the amounts budgeted and provided will be adequate. In addition, future developments, such as changes in law or environmental conditions, could result in increased environmental costs and liabilities that could have a material effect on the financial condition or results of operations. To date, no significant liability has been asserted against us, and compliance with environmental regulations has not has a material effect on the results of operations. - Asbestos The Company is also subject to regulations, including in France, UK and the US, regarding the control and removal of asbestos-containing material and identification of potential exposure of employees to asbestos. It has been Company policy for many years to abandon definitively the use of products containing asbestos by all of its operating units world-wide and to promote the application of this principle to all suppliers, including in those countries where the use of asbestos is permitted. In the past some products containing asbestos have been used and sold, particularly in France, in the Marine Sector, and to a lesser extent in the other Sectors. As a result, the company is aware of to approximately 128 asbestos-related cases in France from employees, former employees or third parties arising out of its activities. The company believes that in those cases compensation will be borne by the general French social security (medical) funds or by the publicly funded Indemnification Fund for Asbestos Victims. In addition, in the United States, the Company is currently subject to approximately 145 asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits which have their origin solely in the Company's purchase of some of ABB's power generation business, for which it is or will be indemnified by ABB. The Company is also currently subject to two lawsuits in the United States asserting fraudulent conveyance claims against various ALSTOM and ABB entities in relation to Combustion Engineering, Inc. (" CE"), for which it is also indemnified by ABB. In January of 2003, CE filed a "pre-packaged" plan of reorganisation in United States bankruptcy court. Hearings are still pending to determine whether the plan would be confirmed by the bankruptcy court. If the plan were to be confirmed by the bankruptcy court, it would then have to be approved by the United States federal district court, and is potentially subject to further appeal. Consummation of the plan also is subject to certain other conditions. In addition to the ABB indemnity, the Company believes that under the terms of the plan it would also be protected against pending and future personal injury asbestos claims, or fraudulent conveyance claims, arising out of the past operations of CE. The Company is also subject to approximately 46 other asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits in the United States involving approximately 2,590 claimants that, in whole or in part, assert claims against the Company which are not related to it's purchase of some of ABB's power generation business or as to which the complaint does not provide details sufficient to permit it to determine whether the ABB indemnity applies. Most of the remaining lawsuits are in the preliminary stages of the litigation process and they each involve multiple defendants. The allegations in these lawsuits often are very general and difficult to evaluate at preliminary stages in the litigation process. In those cases where meaningful evaluation is practicable, the Company believes
that it has valid defences and, with respect to a number of lawsuits, it is asserting rights to indemnification against a third party. The Company also expects a significant number of such cases will be dismissed by plaintiffs without prejudice, subject to being refiled in the future, following discussions with its lawyers. In some additional cases, which await court finalisation, agreements have been reached with plaintiffs for the voluntary dismissal of such cases on a without prejudice basis, which is to say the plaintiffs may refile these cases in the future. The Company has not in recent years suffered any adverse judgement, or made any settlement payment, in respect of any US personal injury asbestos claim. Since 31 October 2002, a total of 101 cases involving approximately 15,516, claimants have been voluntarily dismissed by plaintiffs without prejudice. Generally plaintiffs agree to such dismissals because following discussions, they feel we are not responsible for the claims filed by them. The Company is also subject to a minor number of asbestos related former employee personal injury related claims in other countries, mainly in the UK where it is subject to approximately 142 of such claims. The Company believes that the existing asbestos-related cases described above will not have a material adverse impact on its financial condition. It can, however, give no assurances that such cases will not grow in number or that those it has at present or may face in the future may not have a material adverse impact. - Product liability The Company designs, manufactures, and sells several products of large individual value that are used in major infrastructure projects. In this environment, product-related defects have the potential to create liabilities that could be material. If potential product defects become known, a technical assessment occurs whereby products of the affected type are quantified and studied. If the results of the study indicate that a product liability exists, provisions are recorded. The Company believes that it has made adequate provisions to cover currently known product-related liabilities, and regularly revises its estimates using currently available information. Neither the Company nor any of its businesses are aware of product-related liabilities, which would exceed the amounts already recognised and believes it has provided sufficient amounts to satisfy its litigation, environmental and product liability obligations to the extent they can be estimated. Note 29 - Market related exposures (a) Currency risk Due to the international nature of its activities, numerous cash flows of the Company are denominated in foreign currencies. The Company acquires financial instruments with off balance sheet risk solely to hedge such exposure on either anticipated transactions or firm commitments. The only instruments used are exchange rate guarantees obtained through export insurance companies, forward exchange contracts and options.
The Company may not, in specific circumstances, and as an exception to the policy described above, fully hedge certain identified exposures or anticipate the forthcoming risks on its operating transactions with management approval. With respect to anticipated transactions: o During the tender period, depending on the probability of obtaining the project and market conditions, the Company generally hedges a portion of its tenders using options or export insurance contracts when possible. The guarantees granted by these contract become firm if and when the underlying tender is accepted. o Once the contract is signed, forward exchange contracts or currency swaps are used to adjust the hedging position to the actual exposure during the life of the contract (either as the only hedging instruments or as a complement to existing export insurance contracts). (b) Interest rate risk The Company does not have a dynamic interest rate risk management policy. However, it may enter into transactions in order to hedge its interest rate risk on a case by case basis according to market opportunities, under the supervision of the Executive Committee. At March 31, 2003, the following interest rate swaps are outstanding : - 63 million paying fixed rates to hedge a portion of the Company's fixed rate financial assets. - 353 million receiving fixed rates, 320 million hedging a portion of the 650 million bond issue and 33 million hedging a bilateral loan. - 33 million receiving fixed rates with an effective starting date at January 20, 2004. - 200 million receiving fixed rates to optimise the short term liquidity management.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, 1 year 1 - 5 years 5 years 2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Financial assets at floating rate 1,936 1,709 81 146 Financial assets at fixed rate 549 16 78 455 Financial assets not bearing interests 182 59 16 107 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Financial assets 2,667 1,784 175 708 Financial debt at floating rate (5,016) (2,081) (2,935) - Financial debt at fixed rate (1,315) (604) (695) (16) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Financial debt (6,331) (2,685) (3,630) (16) Net position at floating rate before hedging (3,080) (372) (2,854) 146 Net position at fixed rate before hedging (766) (588) (617) 439 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Total net position before hedging (3,846) (960) (3,471) 585 Swap fixed to variable 290 18 272 - Net position at floating rate after hedging (3,370) (390) (3,126) 146 Net position at fixed rate after hedging (476) (570) (345) 439 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Total net position after hedging (3,846) (960) (3,471) 585 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The net short term borrowing position at floating rate after hedging amounts to 390 million. A 100 bps increase in the market rates would have increased the net interest expense by 4 million, representing 1.5% of the net interest expense for the year-end March 31, 2003.
c) Nominal and fair value of financial instruments outstanding at year-end Nominal value of financial instruments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, 2003 -------------------------------------------------------- (in million) Remaining Average Term Fixed rate Total 1 year 1-5 years 5 years (*) --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- Interest rate instruments: Interest rate swaps - pay fixed 63 15 48 - 5.5% Interest rate swaps - receive fixed 586 233 353 - 4.3% Foreign exchange instruments: Currency swaps - currencies purchased (1) 2,906 1,658 1,249 - Currency swaps - currencies sold (1) 6,898 4,867 2,031 - Forward contracts - currencies purchased 798 584 214 - Forward contracts - currencies sold 2,708 1,646 895 168 Insurance contracts - currencies purchased 96 78 18 - Insurance contracts - currencies sold - - - - Currency options - purchased 591 568 23 - Currency options - sold 564 544 20 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (*) Floating rates are generally based on EURIBOR/LIBOR. (1) the currency swaps include four swaps, two swaps - currency purchased for a notional amount of 1,200 million and two swaps - currency sold for a notional amount of 1,200 million , whose final pay-off are also related to Company's share price. As a whole, these swaps do not create any currency position and their future potential losses are capped. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, 2003 -------------------------------------------------------- (in million) Remaining Average Term Fixed rate Total 1 year 1-5 years 5 years (*) --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- Interest rate instruments: Interest rate swaps - pay fixed 73 11 - 62 11.92 % Interest rate swaps - receive fixed 473 19 449 5 5.30 % Cap 2 - - 2 Foreign exchange instruments: Currency swaps - currencies purchased 1,581 1,550 31 - Currency swaps - currencies sold 7,143 6,243 898 2 Forward contracts - currencies purchased 971 856 115 - Forward contracts - currencies sold 5,172 3,443 1,521 208 Insurance contracts - currencies purchased - - - - Insurance contracts - currencies sold 227 184 43 - Currency options - purchased 854 854 - - Currency options - sold 547 547 - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (*) Floating rates are generally based on EURIBOR/LIBOR.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, 2003 -------------------------------------------------------- (in million) Remaining Average Term Fixed rate Total 1 year 1-5 years 5 years (*) --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- Interest rate instruments: Interest rate swaps - pay fixed 67 _ _ 67 11.92 % Interest rate swaps - receive fixed 1,079 10 361 708 5.36 % Interest rate swaps - floating/floating 200 _ _ 200 - Swaptions 146 113 33 _ 6.91 % Cap 705 222 281 202 - Foreign exchange instruments: Currency swaps - currencies purchased 3,694 3,145 549 _ Currency swaps - currencies sold 4,190 3,383 794 13 Forward contracts - currencies purchased 1,579 1,036 543 _ Forward contracts - currencies sold 6,255 4,105 1,945 205 Insurance contracts - currencies purchased 66 46 20 _ Insurance contracts - currencies sold 527 291 236 _ Currency options - purchased 954 946 8 _ Currency options - sold 453 453 _ _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (*) Floating rates are generally based on EURIBOR/LIBOR. Fair value of financial instruments Publicly traded equity and marketable debt securities are disclosed at market prices. The fair values of all financial instruments other than specified items such as lease contracts, controlled businesses and Equity method investees and other investments and employers' pension and benefit obligations have been estimated using various valuation techniques, including the present value of future cash flows. However, methods and assumptions followed to disclose data presented herein are inherently judgmental and involve various limitations, including the following: - Fair values presented do not take into consideration the effects of future interest rate and currency fluctuations, - Estimates as at March 31, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company would record upon further disposal/termination of the financial instrument. The use of different estimations, methodologies and assumptions may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The methodologies used are as follows: Long term loans, retentions, deposits and other fixed assets The fair values of these financial instruments were determined by estimating future cash flows on an item-by-item basis and discounting these future cash flows using the Company's incremental rates at year-end for similar types of loan arrangements.
Cash and cash equivalents , bank overdrafts, short-term borrowings, The carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheet approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of the instruments. Long-term debt The fair value of the long term debt was determined by either estimating future cash flows on an item-by-item basis and discounting these future cash flows using the Company's incremental borrowing rates at year-end for similar types of borrowing arrangements or using the market price when it relates to publicly traded instruments. Interest rate swaps, currency swaps, options, and forward exchange contracts The fair value of these instruments is the estimated amount that the Company would receive or pay to settle the related agreements, valued upon relevant yield curves and foreign exchange rates as of, March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003. The fair value of forward exchange contracts was computed by applying the difference between the contract rate and the market forward rate at closing date to the nominal amount. Export insurance contracts related to tenders are insurance contracts that are not marked to market. Export insurance contracts that hedge firm commitments are considered as acting as derivatives and were marked to market for the purpose of the disclosure.
The fair value of financial instruments outstanding is analysed as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At March 31, 2001 At March 31, 2002 At March 31, 2003 ------------------------- ------------------------ --------------------- (in million) Carrying Fair Carrying Fair Carrying Fair Value Value Value Value Value Value ------------------------- ------------------------ --------------------- Balance sheet Assets Long term loans,deposits and retentions 776 738 778 750 814 701 Other fixed assets 79 79 79 79 83 83 Short-term investments 496 498 331 333 142 143 Cash & cash equivalents 2,524 2,524 1,905 1,905 1,628 1,628 Liabilities Financial debt 6,231 6,233 6,035 5,948 6,331 5,909 Off balance sheet Interest rate instruments: Interest rate swaps - pay fixed _ _ _ (6 ) _ 9 Interest rate swaps - receive fixed _ 13 _ 11 _ 30 Interest rate swaps - floating/floating _ 4 _ _ _ _ Cross currency swaps _ _ _ _ _ _ Swaptions _ (1 ) _ _ _ _ Cap _ (2 ) _ _ _ _ Foreign exchange instruments Currency swaps - currencies purchased _ 15 _ 16 _ (178 ) Currency swaps - currencies sold _ (71 ) _ (70 ) _ 257 Forward contracts - currencies purchased _ 122 _ 38 _ (30 ) Forward contracts - currencies sold _ (344 ) _ (197 ) _ 87 Insurance contracts - currencies purchased _ _ _ _ _ (6 ) Insurance contracts - currencies sold _ 19 _ 2 _ _ Currency option contracts - purchased _ 1 _ 8 _ 37 Currency option contracts - sold _ (5 ) _ (13 ) _ (7 ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The increase in fair value of forward contracts and currency swaps (currency sold) and the decrease in fair value of forward contracts and currency swaps (currency purchased) is mainly due to the appreciation of euro against US$ during the period. (d) Credit risk The Company hedges up to 90% of the credit risk on certain contracts using export credit insurance contracts. The Company believes the risk of counterparty failure to perform as contracted, which could have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements or results of operations, is limited due to the generally high credit rating of the counterparties. (e) Liquidity risk The Company has diversified its sources of financing using bank financing, making use of sale of trade receivables and securitisation future receivables and other external sources of short term financing.
--------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- (in million) March 31, Less than 1 After 5 2003 year 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years years ------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Financial debt maturity (1) 6,331 2,684 1,507 262 1,659 203 16 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Of which Future receivables 1,292 1,034 254 4 - - - securitised (1) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Available credit line (1) 600 --------------------------------------- Cash & cash equivalents and 1,770 short term investments (2) --------------------------------------- (1) see Note 22 (a)&(b) (2) see Notes 17 & 18 The Company has diversified its sources of financing using bank financing, making use of securitisation of existing and future receivables and other external sources of short term financing. At March 31, 2003 the financial debt of 6, 331 million matures as follows : 2,684 million in fiscal year 2004, 1,507 million in fiscal year 2005 and 2,140 million in the following fiscal years. Excluding future receivables securitised, the reimbursement of which will come from the direct payment of the customer to the investor to whom the Company sold the right to receive the payment, 1, 650 million of financial debt matures in fiscal year 2004, 1,253 million in fiscal year 2005 and 2,136 million in the following fiscal years. In addition, at March 31, 2003 available credit line together with cash and cash equivalents and short term investments amount to 2,370 million among which 1,210 million at parent Company's level. The 600 million credit line matures in December 2003. The Company must renegotiate or renew its credit facilities as they expire, enter into new facilities or obtain capital from other sources in order to refinance its indebtedness as it matures and to finance its working capital and capital expenditure requirements. The Company's ability to maintain and obtain financing depends in large part upon its financial performance. The Company's lines of credit, as well as certain of its other financing agreements, contain covenants requiring it to maintain compliance with pre-established financial ratios. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2003, lines of credit were renegotiated our in order to amend the financial covenants. The Company also obtained agreements from its creditors to amend on the same basis the financial covenants contained in certain other financing agreements. The Company's renegotiated financial covenants require that it maintain (i) a minimum amount of "Consolidated net worth", to be tested by reference to our latest annual and semi-annual consolidated financial statements, (ii) a maximum amount of "Total debt", to be tested by reference to the consolidated financial position, on the last day of each month and (iii) a maximum amount of "Economic debt" to be tested by reference to the consolidated financial position on the last day of each month. In our recently renegotiated syndicated revolving credit agreements, we have an additional financial covenant
expressed as a ratio of EBITDA to consolidated net financial expenses (see Note 22 (a)). The Company's ability to maintain these financial ratios depends in part on the successful execution of its new action plan, including its asset disposal programme expected to generate 3 billion over a two year period, which could be adversely affected by events beyond the Company's control. In the event of a default under any of these agreements, the lenders could elect to declare all of the amounts outstanding under the agreements to be immediately due and payable. In addition to these financial covenants, under its 475 million newly extended credit lines and 600 million new bridge facility, the Company's banks may request the early repayment of all or part of these lines if its shareholders do not approve resolutions at the next annual general meeting authorising the Board of Directors to increase the share capital. Most of the financing agreements and outstanding debt securities include cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions pursuant to which a payment default, an acceleration, or a failure to respect financial covenants or other undertakings, may result in the acceleration of all or a significant part of the Company's debt and may consequently prevent it from drawing upon it credit lines. Note 30 - Payroll, staff, employee profit sharing and stock options ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year ended March 31, (in million except number of employees) 2001 2002 2003 --------------- --------------- -------------- Total wages and salaries 4,709 4,499 3,919 Of which executive officers(*) 7 5 5 Social security payments and other benefits 1,634 1,236 1,032 Employee profit sharing 25 5 18 Staff of consolidated companies at year-end Managers, Engineers and professionals 40,044 38,087 35,983 Other employee 102,970 80,908 73,688 -------------- --------------- --------------- Approximate number of employees 143,014 118,995 109,671 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (*) executive officers at closing.
Stock options Main characteristics of Company's stock options plans are as follows: Plan no. 1 Plan no. 3 Plan no. 5 Plan no. 6 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Date of shareholders' meeting 17 June 1998 24 July 2001 24 July 2001 24 July 2001 Creation date 22 April 1999 24 July 2001 8 January 2002 7 January 2003 Exercise price(1) 27.40 33.00 13.09 6.00 Beginning of exercise 22 April 2004 24 July 2002 8 January 2003 7 January 2004 period(2) Expiration date 21 April 2007 23 July 2009 7 January 2010 6 January 2011 Number of beneficiaries 850 1,703 1,653 5 Total number of options 2,035,000 4,200,000 4,200,000 1,220,000 originally granted Number of options as 2,105,703 4,346,191 4,346,087 1,220,000 adjusted following the completion of the capital increase in July 2002 (3) Total number of options 0 0 0 0 exercised Total number of options 335,071 324,061 245,586 0 cancelled Number of remaining options 1,770,632 4,022,130 4,100,501 1,220,000 as of 31 March 2003 Number of shares that may 95,200 135,565 192,474 1,200,000 be subscribed by members of the executive committee Terms and conditions of Average opening - 1/3 of options - 1/3 of options - 1/3 of options exercise price of shares to exercisable as exercisable as from exercisable as from reach 38, for 40 from 24 July 2002 8 January 2003 7 January 2004 consecutive trading - 2/3 of options - 2/3 of options - 2/3 of options days (between 22 exercisable as exercisable as from exercisable as from April 1999 and from 24 July 2003 8 January 2004 7 January 2005 21 April 2004). - all options - all options - all options If this condition is exercisable as from exercisable as from exercisable as from not fulfilled, the 24 July 2004. 8 January 2005. 7 January 2006. options will no longer be valid. As of today, this condition has not been met. (1) Subscription price corresponding to the average opening price of the shares during the twenty trading days preceding the day on which the options were granted by the board (no discount or surcharge). (2) Except specific conditions mentioned in "Terms and conditions of exercise". (3) Plans no 1, 3 and 5 have been adjusted in compliance with French law as a result of the completion of the capital increase in July 2002
Plans no 2 and no 4 previously granted are void as a result of the non fulfilment of their exercise conditions tied to the realisations of objectives. Therefore, no options have been exercised under these plans and 4 359 775 options have been cancelled. The following is a summary of activity of the plans: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted average exercise Shares price per share ---------------------- ---------------------- Outstanding at April 1st, 2000 6,437,400 29.19 Granted - - Exercised - - Cancelled (350,900) 29.69 ---------------------- ---------------------- Outstanding at March 31, 2001 6,086,500 29.17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Outstanding at April 1st, 2001 6,086,500 29.17 Granted 8,685,000 23.37 Exercised - - Cancelled (540,400) 19.36 ---------------------- ---------------------- Outstanding at March 31, 2002 14,231,100 25.67 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Outstanding at April 1st, 2002 14,231,100 25.67 Outstanding at April 1st, 2002 after Rights Issue 14,726,354 24.81 Granted 1,220,000 6.00 Exercised - - Cancelled (4,833,091) 28.62 Outstanding at March 31, 2003 11,113,263 21.09 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Note 31 - POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS a) Disposal of Industrial Turbines Businesses On 28 April, 2003, the Company announced that binding agreements had been signed to sell its small gas turbines business and its medium-sized gas turbines and industrial steam turbines businesses in two transactions. The total enterprise value of the two transactions is 1.1 billion. Net cash proceeds are expected to be approximately 950 million after deduction of debt transferred and certain other adjustments for cash items. The first transaction covers the small gas turbines business, and the second transaction will cover the medium-sized gas turbines and industrial steam turbines businesses. They include : o the small gas turbines business (3 MW - 15 MW) based principally in the UK; o the medium-sized gas turbines business (15 MW - 50 MW) based principally in Sweden; o the industrial steam turbines (up to about 100MW) business with manufacturing sites in Sweden, Germany and the Czech Republic, and global customer service operations.
In the year ended 31 March 2003, the Company's industrial turbines businesses generated sales of approximately 1.25 billion and an estimated EBIT margin of approximately 7%. They employ some 6,500 people. The transactions are subject to regulatory clearances and documentation is being submitted to the relevant merger control authorities. The completion of the first of two transactions was announced on April 30, 2003. The enterprise value is 575 million with net proceeds of approximately 525 million. Completion of this transaction follows receipt of a formal derogation from the European Commission under the EC merger regulation, allowing ownership of the business to be transferred with immediate effect. The purchaser has committed not to integrate the small gas turbine business with its own businesses until formal merger clearance has been obtained from the European Commission in relation to all the industrial turbines businesses. Pending merger clearance, the medium gas turbines and industrial steam turbines businesses will continue to be owned and managed by the Company. b) Disposal of real estate In April 2003, the Company disposed of 15 sites in France, Spain, Switzerland and Belgium for a total amount of 138 million. c) Restructuring In line with the Company strategic plan discussion have begun to inform trade union representatives regarding overhead reduction and industrial restructuring plans. The first of these restructuring plans, concerning mainly the Power Turbo- Systems Sector has been announced. Note 32 - Major companies included in the scope of consolidation The major companies are selected according to the following criteria : - holding companies - sales above 90 M Consolidation Companies Country Ownership % Method --------- ------- ----------- ------ ALSTOM............................................. France Parent company ALSTOM Holdings.................................... France 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Gmbh (holding).............................. Germany 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM UK Ltd (holding)........................... United Kingdom 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Inc (holding)............................... United-States 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM NV (holding)................................ Netherlands 100.0 Full consolidation
ALSTOM Mexico SA de CV (holding)................... Mexico 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Espana IB (holding)......................... Spain 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM (Switzerland) Ltd........................... Switzerland 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Australia Ltd............................... Australia 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Belgium SA ................................. Belgium 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Brasil Ltda................................. Brazil 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Canada Inc.................................. Canada 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Controls Ltd................................ United Kingdom 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM DDF SA...................................... France 98.8 Full consolidation ALSTOM Energietechnik GmbH......................... Germany 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Ferroviaria Spa............................. Italy 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM K.K......................................... Japan 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM LHB GmbH.................................... Germany 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Ltd ........................................ United Kingdom 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power sro................................... Czech Republic 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd.................. Malaysia 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Boiler GmbH........................... Germany 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Centrales............................. France 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Conversion GmbH....................... Germany 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Conversion SA France.................. France 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Generation AG......................... Germany 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Hydraulique........................... France 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Inc................................... United States 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Italia Spa............................ Italy 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power ltd................................... Australia 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Norway AS............................. Norway 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power O&M Ltd............................... Switzerland 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power SA.................................... Spain 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Service............................... France 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Sp Zoo................................ Poland 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Sweden AB............................. Sweden 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Turbinen GmbH......................... Germany 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power Turbomachines ........................ France 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Power UK Ltd ............................... United Kingdom 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Projects India Ltd.......................... India 68.5 Full consolidation ALSTOM Projects Taiwan Ltd......................... Taiwan 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Rail Ltd.................................... United Kingdom 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Signalling Inc.............................. United States 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM T&D Inc..................................... United States 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM T&D SA...................................... France 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM T&D SA de CV................................ Mexico 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Transport SA................................ France 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Transporte SA de CV......................... Mexico 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Transportation Inc.......................... United States 100.0 Full consolidation ALSTOM Transporte.................................. Spain 100.0 Full consolidation Chantiers de l'Atlantique.......................... France 100.0 Full consolidation Japan Gas Turbines K.K............................. Japan 60.0 Full consolidation EUKORAIL Ltd....................................... South Korea 100.0 Full consolidation West Coast Traincare............................... United Kingdom 76.0 Full consolidation A list of all consolidated companies is available upon request at the head office of the Company.
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS You should read the following discussion together with our Consolidated Financial Statements for fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001 and the notes thereto, "Description of Activities" and "Risk Factors", included elsewhere in this Annual Report. During the periods discussed in this section, we made several significant transactions that affected the comparability of our financial results between periods. In order to allow you to compare the relevant periods, we present certain information both as it appears in our financial statements and adjusted on business composition and exchange rate variations to improve comparability. We describe these adjustments under "Change in business composition and presentation of our accounts, non-GAAP measures - Comparable basis" below. This document contains certain information about the markets in which we operate (market size, competitive position). Unless otherwise stated, we have prepared all market share and statistical data contained in this Annual Report on the basis of internal sources and estimates. OVERVIEW Since our initial public offering in 1998, we have faced a dramatic transformation of the industries in which we operate, and have responded by reshaping our portfolio of products, systems and services. These changes have been principally due to continued deregulation of our markets and privatisation, which have increasingly changed our customer base from one composed of large state-owned companies to one composed of smaller private companies. We have addressed these developments by transforming our Group to broaden its technologies and range of products and by disposing of non-core activities. We believe our core markets in energy and transport are sound, offering: |X| Solid long-term growth prospects based on customers' needs to expand essential infrastructure systems in developing economies and to replace or modernise them in the developed world; and |X| Attractive opportunities in service and systems. We believe we can capitalise on our long-standing expertise in these two markets to achieve competitive differentiation. We are strategically well-positioned and hold good market positions: |X| We are one of the top three players in all market segments, very often number one or number two;
|X| We benefit from one of the largest installed bases of equipment in power generation and rolling stock, which creates a solid base from which to grow our service business; and |X| We are a recognised technology leader in most of our fields of activity, providing best-in-class technology, with unrivalled global presence. However, notwithstanding these opportunities we are pursuing our efforts to improve our performance, adapt to the current downturn in the Power market, solve our past operational problems and strengthen our financial structure. In fiscal year 2003 we suffered an unprecedented 1,381 million net loss, as compared to a 139 million net loss in fiscal year 2002. In response to the continued deterioration of our financial condition and the market generally, our current priority is the successful implementation of a new strategy and action plan designed to secure our long-term future, discussed below under "Strategy and action plan".
MAIN EVENTS OF FISCAL YEAR 2003 Fiscal year 2003 was characterised by the following: |X| Exceptional problems with our GT24/GT26 heavy-duty gas turbines and UK Trains; |X| A successful capital increase; |X| The disposal of businesses and real estate, and |X| The launch of a new strategy and action plan. Exceptional problems with our GT24/GT26 heavy-duty gas turbines In fiscal year 2003 progress continued to be made in implementing a variety of technical improvements to our GT24/GT26 gas turbines, with which we have experienced significant technical difficulties in the past. Our recent progress has enabled flexible and reliable operation of the fleet. As the repaired units accumulate hours in operation, we see that the technology has stabilised. The commercial situation is also becoming much clearer. We have reached commercial settlements on 61 of the 80 units sold, 24 out of which are unconditional, 7 units are currently subject to litigation, and negotiations are ongoing on the remainder. Since November 2002, however, unexpected delays were experienced in finalising the technical recovery package due to unexpected set backs, which we believe have been now recovered, in testing and validating several important components of the recovery package, notably the GT24 compressor upgrade and the `full lifetime' blades. These delays, coupled with the tougher commercial attitude of customers as well as sub-contractors in enforcing their contractual rights due to the accelerated deterioration of the power market, have resulted in extra costs and crystallisation of significant exposures. As a consequence, we have revised our analysis of the residual financial impact of the GT24/GT26 issue on a contract by contract basis, which we currently estimate at 1,530 million net. This amount is based on an estimated remaining gross exposure at 31 March 2003 of 1,984 million, of which we expect to mitigate 454 million by taking numerous actions to reduce our gross exposure. We retained 1,440 million of provisions and accrued contract costs at 31 March 2002 in respect of these turbines. After application of 1,070 million during fiscal year 2003, the remaining provisions and accrued contract costs were 370 million. The net cash outflow on GT24/GT26 was 1,055 million during fiscal year 2003, and 700 million in fiscal year 2002. To cover our currently estimated total net exposure, an additional gross provision of 1,160 million was provided during fiscal year 2003. As a result, the total provisions and accrued contract costs at 31 March 2003 in respect of these turbines were 1,530 million. For more information regarding our GT24/GT26 gas turbines, including information relating to provisions taken in prior years, see "Power-Update on GT24/GT26 gas turbines Issue". For further information relating to our consolidated provisions for warranties, penalties and claims, see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Exceptional problems with our UK trains In 1997, shortly after the privatisation of the UK rail industry, we took five orders for a total of 119 new regional trains with an aggregate value of 670 million. These contracts were part of the first series of orders following the rail deregulation in the UK. At the end of March 2002, we reported that difficulties had been encountered on these UK Regional Trains contracts. 118 of the 119 trains under the UK regional contracts are now in service. Settlements have recently been agreed with our customers, under which we are obliged to implement programmes to improve the trains' reliability, which are ongoing and which are leading to additional costs. Trains are also being delivered on the West Coast Main Line (WCML) contract, registered in February 1999, at the rate of two units per month, in line with customer requirements. Services on the line began in January 2003 and the remaining 38 trains to be delivered are scheduled for delivery by September 2004, but there have, however, also been major delays and cost-overruns on this contract. In fiscal year 2003, we recorded gross additional provisions and accrued contract costs of 140 million to cover the estimated future costs of the continuing improvement programme on the UK Regional Trains and to complete the WCML contract. A part of the additional provision and accrued contract costs was applied during fiscal year 2003. For more information regarding the UK Regional Trains, including information relating to provisions taken in prior years, see "Transport-UK Trains". Capital increase Initially announced in March 2002, a capital increase by way of a rights issue (droits préférentiels de souscription) was completed in July 2002. Pursuant to this offering, 66.3 million new ALSTOM shares were issued at the price of 9.6 per share. The net proceeds of the offering, after deducting underwriting and other discounts and commissions and expenses, amounted to 622 million. ALSTOM's share capital was composed of 281,660,523 shares as at 31 March 2003. Disposal of businesses and real estate Total proceeds from non-core business disposals of 151 million by end of March 2003 In the first step of our initial programme to divest non-core businesses, our South African activities were sold to local participants and financiers for total gross proceeds of 50 million. The sale contract was signed with effect from 1 October 2002. This business generated annual sales of around 170 million in fiscal year 2002 and had 4,000 employees. In January 2003, we also announced the sale of our captive insurance company for total gross proceeds of 101 million. Total proceeds from real estate sales of 231 million by end of March 2003, from investment in real estate for 36 million by end of March 2003, and 138 million in April 2003
In December 2002, our UK real estate portfolio was sold for 175 million. In January 2003, the Group also disposed of one site in France for 22 million. During the last quarter of the fiscal year, we received other disposal proceeds of 34 million, mainly from the disposal of one site in Sweden and one site in the United Kingdom. During the year, we sold the 39% interests in La Maquinista Vila Global for proceeds of 36 million, the company hold real estate assets. Additional proceeds amounting to 138 million were received in April 2003 from the disposal of 15 sites, mainly in France, Spain, Switzerland and Belgium. We have taken leases back on most of the properties we have disposed. Launch of a new strategy and action plan We have launched a new strategy and action plan designed to reduce our debt and improve performance. This plan is discussed below under "Strategy and action plan".
STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN On 12 March 2003, we presented our new strategy and action plan to overcome three current key difficulties: an insufficient level of profitability and cash generation; past problems with the GT24/GT26 gas turbines and the UK trains contracts; and a high level of debt. Our action plan, designed to improve the Group's operational performance significantly and to reduce our high level of debt, is now underway. It comprises three main elements: |X| Focusing our range of activities while strengthening our financial base; |X| Improving our operational performance and adapting to market conditions; and |X| Building a more efficient organisation. Focusing our range of activities while strengthening our financial base Focusing on power generation and rail transport As we cannot provide the resources needed to ensure the future of all those activities which are part of the Group today, we are refocusing our activities in the power generation and rail transport markets through the sale of the Transmission & Distribution Sector (T&D) and the Industrial Turbines businesses. We will also review options to consolidate our Marine activities in the medium term through partnerships or alliances at either national or international levels. The decision to sell T&D and the Industrial Turbines businesses was taken after a thorough review and appraisal of our current portfolio: both are good, high-value businesses but, we believe, their sale will not impact the coherence of our remaining activities. They are autonomous and self-sufficient entities in terms of management, commercial organisation and presence, and research and development. They have different business models: Industrial Turbines, for example, is active in diverse markets other than power generation. There are, therefore, limited commercial synergies with our other ongoing activities. The process to dispose of the T&D Sector was initiated in March 2003. The sale of the Industrial Turbines businesses, which comprises small gas and steam turbines was concluded through the signature of binding sales agreements on 26 April 2003. Please see "Recent Developments" for further details. Developing service As part of our business refocus, our objective is to continue to develop our service business by taking advantage of our strong market positions, technology leadership, broad commercial presence and large installed base. The after market in our Power Sectors, which in fiscal year 2003 represented roughly half of our power generation related sales, has benefited from annual growth rates of over 10% over the past years, generates attractive margins and positive cash flow and has good risk-reward profiles.
We have one of the largest installed bases of power generation equipment in the world, and intend to optimise this competitive advantage to better grow this profitable activity. A third of our sales in fiscal year 2003 were generated by new build activity in power generation, comprising both new equipment and power plant engineering and construction. Our objective is to improve the reliability of our products for new equipment and to be more selective in our power plant engineering and construction activity to improve our risk profile. We have launched restructuring plans to adjust our capacity to market conditions in this area. As far as our sales to the transport markets are concerned, our intention is to focus particularly on our high added value, higher margin service and signaling activities in Transport. Strengthening our financial base Disposal programme increased to 3.0 billion. As part of our new plan, we have increased our disposal programme target proceeds from 1.6 billion as intended a year ago to 3.0 billion by March 2004. This programme comprises: |X| 600 million of targeted proceeds from real estate disposals, of which 267 million was achieved during fiscal year 2003 ( 231 million of proceeds from real estate sales and 36 million from disposal of investment), and an additional 138 million received in April 2003; and |X| 2,400 million of targeted proceeds from business disposals including both Transmission & Distribution (T&D) and Industrial Turbines businesses. 151 million of this target was achieved during fiscal year 2003 with the disposal of our activities in South Africa and of our captive insurance company. An additional 1,100 million has been achieved with the signature in April 2003 of agreements for the sale of our Industrial Turbines businesses, generating net proceeds of around 950 million. Thus, total proceeds secured from disposal of businesses and real estate have now reached 1.5 billion. Capital increase. Though we expect the disposal programme to enable us to reduce our level of debt substantially, our equity will remain too low because of the net loss accounted for in fiscal year 2003. In order to strengthen our balance sheet, we intend to raise up to 600 million in net proceeds through a capital increase by way of a rights issue. Resolutions regarding the capital increase will be submitted for approval at ALSTOM's Annual General Meeting to be held on 2 July 2003. The timing, terms and final amount of the capital increase will be decided by our Board of Directors, and will depend on market conditions. Cash generation initiatives. We are pursuing our efforts to improve cash generation and the management of working capital throughout the Group. These efforts are crystallised under our `Cash for Growth' programme, which aims to strengthen the Group's cash culture: specific cash objectives are set at every level of the organisation, and the practical methodology, tools and measurement systems needed to meet these objectives are provided. Deployment is ongoing through extensive training sessions at Unit level, and by means of in-depth
initiatives which assess the potential for cash release within ALSTOM over the longer-term. As discussed below under "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows - Net cash provided by operating activities", we believe working capital improvements in fiscal year 2003 were encouraging. In the short-term, we increased our available sources of cash pending disposals by obtaining a new credit line of 600 million at 31 March 2003, in addition to 610 million of cash immediately available at parent company level, and 1,160 million at subsidiary level at 31 March 2003. Improving our operational performance and adapting to market conditions We have launched restructuring and cost-reduction programmes necessary to adapt our organisation to current market conditions. We consider this to be vital, in particular, as we estimate, following the end of the US gas turbine ordering boom, the market downturn is set to continue over the next 2-3 years. These programmes will improve our operational performance. The annual restructuring costs are expected to increase to 300 million over the next two years. We believe these measures should lead to recurring annual savings of 500 million by fiscal year 2006. Industrial restructuring. We intend to accelerate our industrial restructuring. The industrial base will be optimised and within each plant, processes revised to increase productivity. Overhead reductions. An extensive programme is to be implemented to reduce our overhead significantly, notably through the simplification of administrative processes and a reduction of layers. Some central functions will be reallocated to the Sectors or eliminated, leading to a significant downsizing of our corporate structure. Globally, savings at Corporate and International Network levels are targeted to reach 35% of current costs. Simultaneously, vigorous plans will be launched in the Sectors, with a target to save 15% of overhead costs in each Sector. Stricter risk management to improve margins. Improvements in margin and in our risk profile will result from a more stringent selection of the projects we bid for and the contract terms we are prepared to accept combined with a stricter control of contract execution. A thorough overhaul of the reporting system is being launched in order to enable "fast track" reporting. A Corporate Risk Committee, chaired by the Chairman & CEO is regularly reviewing offers for the major projects and the performance of ongoing large project execution. Changing the way we work. ALSTOM's umbrella quality and operational improvement programme, Quality Focus Six Sigma, covers all Company functions and operations. It aims to modify the way we work in order to enhance customer satisfaction and improve our results.
Building a more efficient organisation In order to meet our operating margin objective, our internal organisation is being changed based on two key elements: decentralisation and stronger controls. Decentralisation We are implementing rapidly a more efficient organisation. Most notably, our Power Sector, which accounted for 55% of Group sales in fiscal year 2003, was reorganised into 3 new Sectors on 1 April 2003. In addition to having five balanced Sectors, plus T&D pending its disposal, we believe the delayering of the new organisation will substantively reduce overheads. For example, the Power Sector management layer has been removed and the former Segments have been partially merged: the Gas and Steam Power Plant Segments are merged into Power Turbo-Systems, while the Boilers & Environment and Hydro/Turbine Segments are merged into Power Environment; Customer Service is renamed Power Service. A simpler and more reactive structure is being implemented, with a clear P&L accountability in the Sectors, and a fast-track reporting system. Empowerment and full responsibility are given to the Sector management with the removal of any "matrix" between business and country organisations. The new organisation Following the disposals and the re-organisation of the Power Sector, we will have a balanced portfolio of well-positioned activities: |X| Power Turbo-Systems No. 1* in steam turbines, generators and plant engineering & construction, while recovering its position in gas turbines |X| Power Service No. 1* in an attractive and growing business |X| Power Environment No. 1* in boilers, hydro and environmental control: a clear leader in the growing environmental markets |X| Transport No. 2* with a world-class business |X| Marine Leading cruise-ship supplier *ALSTOM estimates The new management team During fiscal year 2003, we renewed our top management, more specifically: |X| Patrick Kron was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of ALSTOM on 11 March 2003, in addition to his role of Chief Executive Officer to which he was appointed on 1 January 2003; and
|X| The Group's senior management has been renewed, with five new members joining ALSTOM's Executive Committee out of a total of 11 (10 after the disposal of the T&D Sector).
GENERAL COMMENTS ON ACTIVITY AND RESULTS The following tables set out, on a consolidated basis, some of our key financial and operating figures:
(1) We define Free cash flow to mean Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less Capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment (excluding proceeds from the sale of real estate as part of our strategic plan) and Increase (decrease) in variation in existing receivables considered as a source of funding of our operations. However, this measure is not a measurement of performance either under French or US GAAP. See "Change in business composition and in presentation of our accounts, non-GAAP measures - Use and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures". (2) Adjusted for changes in business composition and exchange rates as described in "Change in business composition and in presentation of our accounts, non-GAAP measures - Comparable basis". Activity impacted by difficult market conditions The last twelve months were characterised by major market uncertainties, a tightening of the financial markets and a weakening world economy with an economic downturn in Europe and a slowdown in the US, while the US dollar weakened by 20% against the Euro. In this depressed environment, many companies and governments adopted a `wait-and-see' policy towards infrastructure investments. Despite this unfavourable context, markets remained generally buoyant in rail transport and at a sustained level both in electricity transmission and in power generation service. Conditions were less favourable, however, in large gas and steam-related plant and equipment activities in power generation, following the end of the 'gas' boom in the US market, and were difficult in electricity distribution. Our main Marine market, cruise-shipbuilding, was flat, with only three cruise-ship orders (one new contract and two confirmations of previous options) placed in the world-wide market during the fiscal year. Overall, orders decreased by 4% on a comparable basis versus last year, mainly during the last quarter of the fiscal year. Our sales increased by 1% on a
comparable basis. The order backlog amounted to 30.3 billion at 31 March 2003, representing 17 months of sales. Results affected by exceptional provisions Operating income was (434) million in fiscal year 2003, compared with 941 million in fiscal year 2002. Our profitability was affected by the exceptional gross provisions of 1,300 million provided in fiscal year 2003, to cover the additional costs of our GT24/GT26 gas turbines and to a lesser extent the remaining costs of our UK trains issues. Excluding these exceptional provisions, operating income and operating margin were respectively 866 million and 4.1% in fiscal year 2003. Net income was (1,381) million in fiscal year 2003 after exceptional gross provisions of 1,300 million. One-off proceeds 1,040 million of one-off proceeds had been achieved by March 2003 through our capital increase in July 2002 of 622 million, proceeds from the disposal of businesses of 151 million as well as proceeds from the sale of real estate and from investment in real estate of 267 million. Since 31 March 2003, we have signed agreements that resulted or will result in additional proceeds from disposals. Thus, total proceeds secured from disposals of businesses and real estate assets have now reached 1.5 billion, 2.1 billion including our capital increase in July 2002. Improvement of Free cash flow Our Free cash flow was (265) million in fiscal year 2003 compared with (1,151) million in fiscal year 2002. These amounts included net cash outflows resulting from: |X| The GT24/GT26 issue of (1,055) million in fiscal year 2003 and (700) million in fiscal year 2002; as well as from |X| Over-financed contracts for (222) million and (607) million in fiscal years 2003 and 2002. Large contracts obtained prior to fiscal year 2002 provided substantial up front payments to Power on three such contracts and to Transport on one contract. Excluding these cash outflows, the Free cash flow would have been 1,012 million in fiscal year 2003, compared with 156 million in fiscal year 2002. Reduction of Economic debt by 372 million Our Economic debt (See definition in "Change in business composition and in presentation of our accounts, non-GAAP measures - Use and reconciliation of non-
GAAP financial measures") was 4,918 million at 31 March 2003 compared with 5,290 million at 31 March 2002, a decrease of 372 million in fiscal year 2003. This decrease resulted mainly from a Free cash flow of 1,012 million, the capital increase of 622 million, net proceeds from disposals, and despite exceptional net cash outflows of 1,277 million as described above.
(1) Redeemable preference shares and undated subordinated bonds reclassified in Financial debt as of 31 March 2003. See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Disposal of our Industrial Turbines business On 26 April 2003, we signed binding agreements to sell our small gas turbines business and medium-sized gas turbines and industrial steam turbines businesses in two transactions to Siemens AG. This is a key step in our continuing disposal programme to strengthen our financial base. The total enterprise value of the two transactions is 1,100 million. Net cash proceeds are expected to be approximately 950 million after deduction of transferred debt and certain other adjustments for cash items. The first transaction covers our small gas turbines business, and the second transaction covers our medium-sized gas turbines and industrial steam turbines businesses. The industrial turbines businesses being sold accounted for approximately 10% of Power Sector revenues in fiscal year 2003. They include: |X| the small gas turbines business (3 MW - 15 MW), based principally in the UK; |X| the medium-sized gas turbines business (15 MW - 50 MW), based principally in Sweden; and |X| the industrial steam turbines (up to about 100 MW), business with manufacturing sites in Sweden, Germany and the Czech Republic, and global customer service operations. In the year ended 31 March 2003, Industrial Turbines businesses generated sales of approximately 1.25 billion and an estimated operating margin of approximately 7%. At 31 March 2003, these businesses employed approximately 6,500 people. These transactions are subject to regulatory approval and documentation has been submitted to the relevant merger control authorities. On 30 April 2003, we announced the closing of the sale of the small gas turbines business. The enterprise value of this transaction is 575 million, with net proceeds of approximately 525 million. Completion of this transaction followed receipt of a formal derogation from the European Commission under the EC merger regulation, allowing ownership of the business to be transferred to Siemens AG with immediate effect. Siemens AG has committed not to integrate the small gas turbine business with its own businesses until formal merger clearance has been obtained from the European Commission in relation to all the industrial turbines businesses. Pending merger clearance, the medium gas turbines and industrial steam turbines businesses to be acquired by Siemens AG will continue to be owned and managed by ALSTOM. Disposal of Real Estate In April 2003, we received proceeds of 138 million in respect of the disposal of 14 sites in France, Spain, Switzerland and Belgium.
Total proceeds to date from our real estate programme reached 405 million (267 million received in fiscal year 2003 and 138 million in April 2003). Status of T&D disposal The process to dispose of the T&D Sector was launched on 12 March 2003. On the basis of indicative offers, potential buyers have been selected with whom the bidding process is continuing. Completion is expected by the end of the calendar year 2003. Restructuring In line with the plan announced on 12 March 2003, we have begun the process of informing trade union representatives regarding the social consequences of the overhead reduction and industrial restructuring plans. This process is expected to continue in the coming months. On 25 April 2003, we announced the details of the Power Turbo-systems restructuring plan, covering 3,000 job reductions out of 11,000 currently employed.
OUTLOOK The timing of recovery in the power generation equipment and cruise-ship markets is uncertain over the short to medium-term. While we believe that the Transport market should remain sound, activity is likely to decrease following this year of exceptionally high activity. While we expect overall demand to be generally low over the next months due to the depressed power generation market, we are confident that market fundamentals will lead, in the medium to long-term, to growing demand for both new equipment and service in our markets. Sales should decrease in the next fiscal year due to the lower level of orders received in fiscal year 2003 mainly in Power, but we expect them to subsequently recover on a comparable basis. Due to our extensive restructuring plans and given our achievement on underlying operating margin in fiscal year 2003, we expect to be able to achieve 6% operating margin by fiscal year 2006. Our Free cash flow is highly affected by cash outflows linked to the GT24/GT26 gas turbines and financial costs due to our high level of debt. Once this cash outflow ceases, we expect the Group to generate strongly positive cash flow. We expect our Economic debt to be reduced from around 5.0 billion in March 2003, to a level in the range of 2.0-2.5 billion by March 2005, depending on the magnitude of additional funds raised through the planned capital increase by way of a rights issue. 1,879 million of our financial debt, consisting of our 600 million bridge facility, our 475 million extended credit facilities, 254 million of credit lines and 550 million of bonds, is to mature in fiscal year 2004. Other lines are to mature in fiscal year 2005. We currently believe that we will meet these payment obligations as they come due through the application of net cash provided from operations, the proceeds of real estate and business disposals, the proceeds of a proposed capital increase, from the renewal of existing lines of credit and from new credit lines we expect to obtain. Our targets, therefore, are the following: |X| to achieve consolidated sales of over 15 billion by end of fiscal year 2005; |X| to achieve operating margin of 6% by fiscal year 2006; |X| to generate strongly positive Free cash flow; and |X| to reduce our Economic debt to the range of 2.0-2.5 billion by March 2005.
The success of our new strategy and action plan, our sales, operating margin and financial position could differ materially from the goals and targets expressed above if any of the risks we describe in the section entitled "Risk Factors", or other unknown risks, materialise.
CHANGE IN BUSINESS COMPOSITION AND PRESENTATION OF OUR ACCOUNTS, NON-GAAP MEASURES Changes in Business Composition Our results of operations for the three years ended 31 March 2001, 2002 and 2003 have been significantly impacted by the acquisitions and disposals described below. The table below sets out our main acquisitions and joint ventures during the periods indicated. Sales and numbers of employees are presented for the fiscal year preceding the acquisition, except as otherwise indicated.
The table below sets out our main disposals during the periods indicated. Sales are presented for the fiscal year preceding disposal.
Power Under the terms of the agreement we signed on 23 March 1999, we sold our heavy-duty gas turbines business to General Electric (GE) for net proceeds of US$ 912 million. The heavy-duty gas turbines business we sold to GE contributed 609 million to our sales for the year ended 31 March 1999. Also on 23 March 1999, we entered into an agreement with ABB to create a new joint venture, ABB ALSTOM Power. On 30 June 1999, we transferred to ABB ALSTOM Power all of our Energy operations, except for the heavy-duty gas turbines business that we had sold to GE. ABB transferred to ABB ALSTOM Power substantially all of its power generation business, except for its nuclear operations, Combustion Engineering Inc. and its asbestos liabilities. At the time of the transaction, the combined sales of ABB ALSTOM Power amounted to approximately 9.9 billion, of which approximately 7.2 billion was contributed by ABB and approximately 2.7 billion by us. To offset the difference in the size of the contributions made by us and by ABB and to reach ownership parity, we paid ABB 1.48 billion, approximately US$ 1.53 billion at that date, upon the creation of the joint venture. On 11 May 2000, we acquired ABB's 50% interest in ABB ALSTOM Power. We paid ABB 1.25 billion in cash. This transaction included the resolution of all outstanding matters related to the formation of the joint group. In these two transactions, we acquired substantially all of ABB's power generation business for approximately 2.7 billion. As a result of this repositioning, the reported figures for Power in fiscal years 2001, 2002 and 2003 are not directly comparable. For fiscal year 2001, the figures reflect the 50% consolidation of ABB ALSTOM Power under the proportional consolidation method from 1 April 2000 to 10 May 2000 and the 100% consolidation of Power from 11 May 2000 to 31 March 2001. The figures for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 reflect the full consolidation for the entire year. Power Conversion Power Conversion was created on 1 July 1999 from the merger of our Drives and Controls, Motors and Generators and several smaller related businesses previously part of our former Industry Sector. Power Conversion replaced Industry within our reporting structure from 1 April 2000. We integrated this Sector into T&D with effect from 1 April 2002. Contracting We sold our former Contracting Sector on 20 July 2001 to CDC Equity Capital (CDC IXIS Group) and Charterhouse Development Capital, which financed a management buy-out. The transaction was finalised with a sale price of 756 million. Change in presentation of accounts The following changes have been made to the presentation of our accounts and previous years' figures have been restated accordingly. See Note 2(a) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|X| Amortisation of goodwill is now presented immediately above net income and no longer included in Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT). |X| Securitisation of future receivables is no longer included in Customer deposits and advances and is being added to our financial debt. |X| The related costs of securitisation of future receivables is accounted for in Financial income (expenses) rather than in Other income (expense). |X| Cash effects of securitisation of existing receivables are now shown separately in the Consolidated Statement of cash flows. |X| Deferred tax assets and liabilities are shown net to reflect the effects of tax groupings within the same scope. The following changes have been made to the presentation of our accounts, however, previous year's figures have not been restated. See Note 22 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. |X| Our 205 million preference shares, redeemable in 2006, have been reclassified in long-term financial debt; and |X| Our 250 million undated subordinated notes have been reclassified in financial debt. In addition, we are now disclosing Earning Before Interest and Tax ("EBIT"), Capital Employed and Return on Capital Employed ("ROCE") by Sector, as described below. Use and reconciliation of Non-GAAP financial measures From time to time in this section, we disclose figures which are non-GAAP financial measures. Under the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of our historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding amounts, that are included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in our Consolidated Income Statement, Consolidated Balance Sheet or Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows; or includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of including amounts, that are excluded from the most directly comparable measure so calculated and presented. In this regard, GAAP refers to generally accepted accounting principles in France. Free cash flow We define Free cash flow to mean Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less Capital expenditures, net of minor proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment and Increase (decrease) in variation in existing receivables considered as source of funding of our activity. Total proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow include proceeds from our real estate disposal programme designed under our strategy and action plan that we eliminate from the calculation of the Free cash flow given that this programme is non-recurring and given that we
consider the receipt of only minor proceeds as part of our normal operations. Free cash flow does not represent Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, as calculated under French GAAP, and should not be considered as an indicator of operating performance or whether cash flows will be sufficient to fund cash needs. The most directly comparable financial measure to Free cash flows calculated and presented in accordance with French GAAP is Net cash provided by (used in) Operating activities, and a reconciliation of Free cash flows and Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities is presented below.
We use the Free cash flow measure both for internal analysis purposes as well as for external communications, as we believe it provides more accurate insight into the actual amount of cash generated or used by our operations. Management believes the presentation of Free cash flow is beneficial to investors for this reason. Economic Debt We define Economic debt to mean Net debt (or Financial debt net of short term investments and cash and cash equivalents) plus cash proceeds from sale of trade receivables ("securitisation of existing receivables"). Economic debt does not represent our Financial debt as calculated under French GAAP, and should not be considered as an indicator of our currently outstanding indebtedness, as trade receivables securitised are sold irrevocably and without recourse. The most directly comparable financial measure to Economic debt calculated and presented in accordance with French GAAP is Financial debt, and a reconciliation of Economic debt and Financial debt as measured in accordance with French GAAP is presented below.
(1) Our redeemable preference shares and undated subordinated notes have been reclassified in Financial debt as at 31 March 2003. See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We use the Economic debt measure both for internal analysis purposes as well as for external communications, as we believe it provides a more accurate measure by which to analyse our total external sources of funding for our operations and its variation from one period to another. Capital Employed/Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) We define Capital Employed to mean fixed assets, net, plus current assets (excluding net amount of securitisation of existing receivables), less provisions for risks and charges and current liabilities. Further, we use Capital Employed to calculate Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), which we define as EBIT divided by Capital Employed. Capital Employed does not represent current assets, as calculated under French GAAP. The most directly comparable financial measure to Capital Employed and presented in accordance with French GAAP is current assets, and a reconciliation of Capital Employed and current assets is presented below. Capital employed by Sector and for the Group as a whole are also presented in Note 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We use the Capital Employed and ROCE measures both for internal analysis purposes as well as for external communications, as we believe they provide insight into the amount of financial resources employed by a Sector or the Group as a whole and the profitability of a Sector or the Group as a whole in regard to the resources employed.
Management believes the presentation of Capital Employed and ROCE is useful to investors for this reason. Comparable basis The figures presented in this section include performance indicators presented on an actual basis and on a comparable basis. Figures have been given on a comparable basis in order to eliminate the impact of changes in business composition and changes resulting from the translation of our accounts into euros following the variation of foreign currencies against the euro. All figures provided on a comparable basis are non-GAAP measures. We use figures prepared on a comparable basis both for our internal analysis and for our external communications, as we believe they provide means by which to analyse and explain variations from one period to another. However, these figures provided on a comparable basis are unaudited and are not measurements of performance under either French or US GAAP. To prepare figures on a comparable basis, we have performed the following adjustments to the corresponding figures presented on an actual basis: |X| We have restated the actual figures for fiscal years 2001 and 2002 using 31 March 2003 exchange rates for order backlog, orders received, sales and operating income and elements constituting our operating income. |X| Adjustments due to changes in business composition have then been made to the same indicators for fiscal years 2001 and 2002. More particularly: |X| contributions of material activities sold since 1 April 2001 have been excluded from the figures reported in fiscal years 2001 and 2002, mainly Contracting and GTRM; |X| contributions of material activities acquired since 1 April 2001, have been included in the figures reported in fiscal years 2001 and 2002 using historical data or the same data as fiscal year 2003 when historical data were not available, mainly Fiat Ferroviaria; and |X| the contribution of ABB ALSTOM Power from 1 April 2000 to 10 May 2000 has been included to reflect a 100% consolidation of Power Sector in fiscal year 2001.
The following table sets out our estimates of changes in exchange rates and in business composition ("Scope impact") for all indicators disclosed in this Annual Report both on an actual basis and on a comparable basis for fiscal years ended 31 March 2001, 2002 and 2003. No adjustment has been made on figures disclosed for fiscal year 2003:
A significant part of our sales and expenditures are realised and incurred in currencies other than the euro. The principal currencies to which we had significant exposures in fiscal year 2003 were US dollars, Pounds sterling, Swiss francs, Mexican Peso and Brazilian Real. Our orders received and sales have been impacted by the translation of our accounts into euros resulting from changes in value of the euro against other currencies in fiscal year 2003. The impact was a decrease by around 5% for both compared with fiscal year 2002.
KEY OPERATING AND GEOGRAPHICAL FIGURES FOR THE YEARS ENDING 31 MARCH 2001, 2002, AND 2003 The following tables set out, on actual and comparable basis, select key financial and operating figures for the Group as a whole. Corresponding figures will be presented and discussed on a Sector by Sector basis in following sections.
Order backlog Our order backlog consists of a combination of confirmed orders for short-term projects, particularly for our T&D Sector and our various service activities, and confirmed orders for longer-term projects, particularly for our Power, Marine and Transport Sectors. Our short-term projects are generally traded within one year of the date we record the order, while long-term projects generally are traded within three years. Operation and maintenance contracts can often have terms of up to ten years and occasionally much longer.
The order backlog decreased by 15% in fiscal year 2003 compared with fiscal year 2002, mainly due to exchange rate variations and, to a lesser extent, changes in business composition. On a comparable basis, the decrease is 8%. On an actual basis, order backlog included 6.1 billion of operation and maintenance contracts at 31 March 2003 compared with 5.8 billion at 31 March 2002, illustrating the increasing importance of service businesses in our activities. Given the decrease in orders received, the importance of service businesses is even more pronounced. The order backlog decreased by 9% in fiscal year 2002 compared with fiscal year 2001, on an actual basis, due primarily to the disposal of Contracting and GTRM. On a comparable basis, the decrease was 5% mainly due to Power and Marine, partially offset by an increase in Transport. The order backlog in terms of months of sales (calculated by dividing the order backlog by one twelfth of annual sales) slightly decreased from 18 months in fiscal year 2002 (19 months on a comparable basis) to 17 months in fiscal year 2003.
Orders received Orders received represent the value of all the agreements signed with customers to supply a product or set of products and/or to provide a service or a set of services within a specified time, and under specified quality, price and funding conditions. They represent our future sales. Orders received decreased by 16% in fiscal year 2003 compared with fiscal year 2002, on an actual basis, mainly due to the disposal of Contracting and GTRM and to exchange rate variations. On a comparable basis, the decrease was 4%, mainly in the last quarter of fiscal year 2003 and mainly due to a decrease in the Power and Marine Sectors, partially offset by a strong increase in Transport. Orders received during fiscal year 2002 decreased by 12% on an actual basis, due to the lack of significant Marine orders following an exceptionally strong fiscal year 2001, partly offset by increases in Transport and T&D. Power orders received decreased. Geographical analysis of orders received by country of destination We have a permanent industrial or commercial presence in more than 70 countries around the world. The table below sets out, on an actual basis, the geographic breakdown of orders received by country of destination.
In fiscal year 2003, the geographic breakdown of orders received was broadly equivalent to that in fiscal year 2002. Europe remained the most important market in terms of orders received, with 46% of the total. On an actual basis, orders received decreased in this region by 12% in fiscal year 2003 compared with fiscal year 2002 due to the disposal of GTRM and Contracting. On a comparable basis, they increased by 3%, due to the increases in France, Germany and Sweden. North America decreased during the fiscal year due to exchange rate variations but remained stable on a comparable basis, as the US dropped particularly in the gas turbine market following an unprecedented boom over the previous two years, which resulted in over-ordering. The slow down of Power in the US has been partly compensated by orders received by Transport, which received certain large contracts during the year (metros in New York; subway cars in Washington; passenger rail coaches in New Jersey). The 46% decrease in
South America resulted from exchange rate variations and from Power where the market followed the North America trend. Although Asia/Pacific decreased by 35% due to a lack of liquidity, prospects are encouraging as there were signs of recovery in that region towards the end of the period, although the impact of the recent SARS outbreak has still to be assessed. Orders received in Middle East/Africa increased by 33% (53% on a comparable basis) between fiscal years 2003 and 2002. Geographical analysis of sales by country of destination and of origin The table below sets out, on an actual basis, the geographical breakdown of sales by country of origin and by country of destination. Sales by country of destination are presented by Sector on an actual basis in the Section of this Annual Report entitled "Description of Activities".
Sales by country of destination Europe remained stable in fiscal year 2003 compared with fiscal year 2002 but increased by 11%, on a comparable basis, resulting mainly from high levels of deliveries to SNCF during fiscal year 2003. In Mexico (classified in North America) and in the US, the execution of gas turbines projects began coming to an end. This has been compensated by Middle East/Africa where large projects were being executed (Al Hidd Phase 2 in Bahrain and Okpai Lot 1 in Nigeria). The growth by 7% (net of a decrease by 15% due to exchange rate variations) in South and Central America was the result of large orders received from previous years that are being executed (i.e. Brazil and Chile). The Asia/Pacific trend remained stable, as the fluctuation was consistent with the normal fluctuation of companies executing large projects. Sales by country of origin Sales by origin tended to be more stable. Historically, our businesses had strong origins in Europe (GEC, ALCATEL ALSTHOM, ABB and AEG). The European Union production was dominated by France (24% of our employees), UK (12% of our employees), Germany (9% of our employees) and Switzerland (5% of our employees).
POWER The following table sets forth some key financial and operating data for the Power Sector:
(1) After 1,160 million of exceptional provisions in fiscal year 2003. Orders received Fiscal year 2003 saw an abrupt market downturn in the US - particularly in the gas turbine market following an unprecedented boom during the prior two years, which had resulted in ordering beyond customer's needs. There were multiple order cancellations and postponements in fiscal year 2003 due to the excess capacity created in the previous two years. Private investors, attracted by the market liberalisation in the US, were badly hurt last year as the sudden over-capacity resulted in electricity prices falling significantly and a large value decrease of their generation assets. Latin America suffered from economic difficulties and regulatory confusion, and this led to a drop in the number of projects being built. In Europe, the market remained active, in particular in Spain and Italy. New power stations were ordered in the Middle East at a steady pace throughout the year. In Asia, a lack of liquidity and perceived comfortable reserve margins in some countries held back projects, but there were signs of a recovery towards the end of the fiscal year. China continued to develop its capacity, however this was dominated by projects awarded primarily to local suppliers. The increased price volatility for fuel and electricity emanating from the liberalisation of markets has re-emphasised the need for flexibility and
diversity of power generation technologies. Environmental policies are increasingly being integrated into market requirements favouring our environmental control equipment. In this uncertain market, on an actual and comparable basis, orders received in fiscal 2003 were respectively 22% and 16% below fiscal year 2002, with a more pronounced drop occurring in the last quarter of fiscal year 2003. The difference between actual and comparable figures was due to exchange rate variations exclusively.
With respect to the business segments within the Power Sector in fiscal year 2003: o Boilers & Environment decreased compared with the prior fiscal year. This reduction was mainly seen in the Heat Exchange and Heat Recovery Business, due to the significant decrease in gas power plant orders this year. o Customer Service finished fiscal year 2003 ahead of last fiscal year supported by improved O&M (Operation and Maintenance) business and a continued strong performance in Western European markets and in the US. o The main reduction was seen in Gas Turbines, following the sharp downturn in the global new equipment market. o Orders received in Hydro showed a small increase compared with fiscal year 2002. o Orders received for Industrial Turbines decreased compared with fiscal year 2002 due to the downturn in the US gas and combined-cycle markets, further negatively influenced by continued low volumes in the Flow Systems market. o Orders received for Steam Power Plant increased compared with fiscal year 2002. The turnkey market was low in the fiscal year, with few new orders booked; however, the world-wide retrofit market has been strong, supported by demand for nuclear power plant life-extension, mainly in the US. Currently, a number of turnkey opportunities exist, but it is difficult to predict when they will translate into firm orders. By geography, orders received significantly increased by 16% in the European Union, essentially due to an increase in France, Germany and Sweden. North America dropped by 39%, due to the US. South America has followed North America, and the Brazilian economy has deteriorated thus reducing the likelihood of new infrastructure investments in the near future. Asia was still an important market, and although there was some slowdown in fiscal year 2003, prospects remain optimistic. Orders received by Power in fiscal year 2002 decreased by 4% on an actual basis compared with fiscal year 2001, and by 8% on a comparable basis. The difference between the actual and comparable figures was mainly due to the 50% consolidation of ABB ALSTOM Power under the proportional consolidation method from 1 April 2000 to 10 May 2000 and the 100% consolidation of Power from 11 May 2000 to 31 March 2001. Customer Service, Boilers & Environment products and Industrial Gas Turbines segments saw significant increases in orders received. Those increases were offset by declines in Steam Power Plant and Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines, due to the postponement of turnkey projects, and in Hydro. Sales Sales in fiscal year 2003 reduced 16% compared with fiscal year 2002, on an actual basis, and reduced 10% on a comparable basis. With respect to the business segments within the Power Sector in fiscal year 2003: o Boilers & Environment Segment sales increased, due to higher demand for environmental control and a strong opening backlog in utility boilers and energy recovery systems.
o Customer Service Segment sales also increased compared with fiscal year 2002, supported by improved volumes coming from O&M contracts. o A sharp decrease of sales in the Gas Segment was due to the decline in order intake in earlier years. o Due to a high past order intake, Hydro Segment sales also increased as the order backlog converted into sales. o Industrial Turbine Segment sales remained stable. o A sharp decrease of sales in the Steam Power Plant Segment was due to the reduction in the backlog of large turnkey project deliveries. By geography, North America continued to represent the main region for Power, with deliveries of gas turbines, boiler and steam components as well as our strong service business. Europe remained an important market where sales increased by 5%, while Asia/Pacific reduced by 34%. Sales increased by 8% in fiscal year 2002 compared with fiscal year 2001, on an actual basis and by 4% on a comparable basis. The main contributors to this increase were Customer Service and Industrial Gas Turbines. This increase was partly offset by decreases in Boiler & Environment, Steam Power Plant and Gas Turbines. Hydro sales remained stable. Operating income and operating margin Operating income and operating margin both decreased in fiscal year 2003 to (690) million and -6.3% compared with 572 million and 4.4% in fiscal year 2002 on an actual basis. Significant increases in the Boiler & Environment, Steam Power Plant and Industrial Turbine Segments were mainly due to improved margins. These improvements were offset by the negative financial effects of the GT24/GT26 gas turbines problems and the related exceptional gross provision recorded in fiscal year 2003 of 1,160 million. Excluding this exceptional provision, operating income and operating margin were respectively 470 million and 4.3% in fiscal year 2003. Operating margin increased to 4.4% in fiscal year 2002, from 3.7% in fiscal year 2001, as a result of costs savings and increased focus on higher value activities. Capital employed Capital employed, at 2,383 million at 31 March 2003, decreased on an actual basis from 3,012 million at 31 March 2002, mainly resulting from goodwill amortisation and tighter working capital management under our "Cash for Growth" programme. New organisation With effect from 1 April 2003, the Power Sector was reorganised into 3 new Sectors (4 Sectors before the disposal of the former Industrial Turbines Business). The table below sets forth an initial assessment of the breakdown of orders received and sales in the new structure for the fiscal year 2003 in billions of euros:
Update on GT24/GT26 Gas Turbine Issues GT24 and GT26 gas turbines, with outputs of 180 MW and 260 MW, respectively, are the largest of our extensive range of gas turbines. The technology was originally developed by ABB in the mid-1990s, with most sales made prior to the acquisition by ALSTOM. These turbines are based on an advanced design concept. At the start of the commercial operation of the second generation, or "B" version turbines, in 1999 and 2000, a number of technical issues were identified, showing the turbines would not meet the contractual performance and lifetime obligations. In response, we set in motion high-priority initiatives to design and implement modifications across the fleet. The first step of these initiatives was to de-rate the units so that they could operate in commercial service with lower efficiency and output, while we developed the technical solutions to allow full rating operation. We also embarked on a comprehensive programme to discuss and resolve any contractual issues with customers. Commercial settlements with customers were negotiated to deal with the consequences of the de-rating. Typically, what was proposed was a Performance Recovery Period of around 2-3 years, prior to implementing the life-time and performance upgrades, that we call a "recovery package". This deferred the timing of the date at which provisional acceptance was achieved and related contractual remedies, including liquidated damages, applied. During that period, varying solutions were applied depending on the situation, however in general we replaced short life components at our costs and agreed on contractual amendments, including revised financial conditions, with each customer. We have already implemented some technical improvements to the turbines, which permit flexible and reliable operation of the fleet. This is confirmed by third-party statistics showing that the reliability of the GT24 fleet is above 98% in the 2002 calendar year. Operational reliability and flexibility are important ingredients for our customers, particularly for those in merchant markets. Our confidence in the technology has been reinforced by the major progress achieved over the past 6 months. Modifications aimed at delivering enhancements to output and efficiency have been designed, validated and tested as follows: |X| Compressor massflow and efficiency increase for GT26 - Successful demonstration of increased electrical output improvement at our full-scale test facility in Birr, Switzerland. Compressor massflow and efficiency increase for GT24 successfully tested at a power plant inMexico. Improved, validated and tested compressor upgrades are now being delivered to existing site installations and in new applications. |X| High fogging Inlet System - Successful demonstration of an increase of more than 6% in electrical output in both the test facility and field validation units. The system can be applied to both existing and new gas turbine installations. |X| Dual Fuel Capability - Successful demonstration in both the test facility and field validation units. The system is now available for commercial application on both existing and new gas installations. Reduction of design risk and the validation of upgraded components have been advanced by the technology agreement with Rolls-Royce we signed in February 2002 by using their aero-engine technology and experience base. Most importantly, while the units accumulate hours in operation, we see that the technology has stabilised. The 71 machines in service have accumulated, as of March 2003, over half a million operating hours at high reliability levels. The commercial situation with respect to the GT24/GT26 gas turbines is also becoming much clearer. We have reached commercial settlements on 61 of the 80 units and of these settlements 24 are unconditional, that is to say the contracts are in the normal warranty period, and there is no obligation to upgrade or pay further penalties. Under the other 37 settlements, we are committed to make additional upgrade improvements, either in respect of performance or the life of key components, and are required to pay liquidated damages if the modified gas turbines do not meet performance criteria or if we do not respect the agreed time delays for the implementation of the modifications. As concerns the remaining 19 units for which no settlements have been reached, 7 are currently subject to litigation, and negotiations are ongoing or have not started for the remainder. The order backlog included 558 million, at 31 March 2003, in respect of a GT26 contract currently suspended on which the customer has an option for termination. If this contract does not proceed, the orders in hand will need to be adjusted accordingly. Notwithstanding the progress achieved to date, since November 2002, we have experienced unexpected set backs and delays, now resolved, in validating and testing several important components of the recovery package, notably the GT24 compressor upgrade and the "full lifetime" blades. These delays resulted in our being unable to respect the duration of the recovery periods agreed with some of our customers under applicable agreements, including under conditional settlement agreements, prior to the implementation of the recovery package with the expected improvements in performance, efficiency and life of key components. In the current state of the energy wholesale markets, customers do not have the incentive to accept these machines. These delays therefore mean significantly increased exposure as customers are less inclined to agree to further extensions of the recovery periods and are invoking penalties and liquidated damages. We also incur additional costs because we have been forced to shut down the
machines more frequently to replace short life components at our expense. Our previously expected targets were therefore not achievable in the current context. As a consequence, we have revised our analysis of the residual financial impact of the GT24/GT26 issue on a contract by contract basis, which we now estimate at 1,530 million net. This amount is based on an estimation of the remaining gross exposure in March 2003 of 1,984 million, on which we expect to mitigate 454 million by taking numerous actions to reduce our estimated gross exposure. In fiscal year 2000, ABB ALSTOM Power, of which we owned 50% at that time, recorded a total of 519 million of provisions in accrued costs in respect of the GT24/GT26 gas turbines. In fiscal year 2001, we recorded a total of 1,068 million of provisions and accrued contract costs related to the turbines. In fiscal year 2002, we recorded an additional 1,075 million of provisions and accrued contract costs related to the turbines. We retained 1,440 million of provisions and accrued contract costs at 31 March 2002 in respect of these turbines. After application of 1,070 million during fiscal year 2003, the remaining amount of provisions was 370 million. To cover the total revised net exposure, an additional gross provision of 1,160 has been provided during fiscal year 2003. As a result, the total gross provisions and accrued contract costs at 31 March 2003 in respect of these turbines were 1,530 million. For further information relating to our consolidated provisions for penalties and claims, see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Reference should also be made to "Risk factors - Our products, including the GT24/GT26 heavy-duty gas turbines and the UK Trains, often incorporate advance and complex technologies and sometimes require modifications after they have been delivered".
TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION (T&D) The following table sets forth some of key financial and operating data for the T&D Sector:
Orders received In fiscal year 2003, the transmission and distribution market decreased compared to fiscal year 2002. The main reasons were investment delays due to deregulation uncertainty in the US and reduced capital expenditures of industrial customers. This has mainly affected the US and European markets while the Chinese and Northern African markets remained strong. New growth drivers of the transmission and distribution market have gained momentum, though they have not reached their full expected impact. In several developed countries, governments have set aggressive targets for the development of renewable energy sources. Power quality concerns and removal of transmission and distribution bottlenecks have lead to an important growth of the power electronics market, mainly in Static Var Compensators. While the digitalisation of the transmission and distribution networks is progressing, the rapid development of energy & market management systems has temporarily stagnated due to deregulation delays in the US. Orders received decreased by 4% in fiscal year 2003 compared with fiscal year 2002, on an actual basis, due to changes in business composition and exchange rate variations. On a comparable basis, orders received increased by 4%. The product activity both in medium voltage and power transformers has been weak while globally transmission projects and systems and service businesses
maintained a sound activity level. Total orders for T&D Service activities as a whole amounted to just over 460 million in fiscal year 2003. Geographically, market growth continued in fast-developing countries such as China and Eastern Europe, while Western Europe was flat and the US experienced a slowdown in deregulation, which had a negative impact on growth. The level of orders received decreased slightly in Europe, particularly in Switzerland and the United Kingdom. However, this was partly offset by an increased orders from Austria, Greece and Spain. Europe remained the largest contributor to T&D Sector activity. The Americas have experienced a fall in order intake despite large orders such as that of Ancoa/Charrua in Chile. In Mexico, the decrease is due to the smaller number of large Transmission Projects contracts being recorded, while in the US there has been a decrease in activity of both medium and high voltage products. Canada, however, has experienced an increase in orders received. Despite this fall in activity, the Americas account for 21% of T&D's orders received. The African market has undergone the largest growth in activity, mainly due to an order received from BCC Sonelgaz in Algeria for the refurbishment of various substations. Despite continuing growth in China, Taiwan and Singapore, T&D orders in Asia/Pacific decreased due to a lower level of activity in Australia, Hong Kong and India. Orders received in fiscal year 2002 increased by 7% over fiscal year 2001, on an actual basis and 3% on a comparable basis. This performance in a difficult market was achieved principally through the creation of a new international marketing and sales organisation. Sales Sales decreased by 5% in fiscal year 2003 compared with fiscal year 2002 on an actual basis, due to changes in business composition and exchange rate variations. On a comparable basis, sales increased by 1%. This growth in sales was strongest in the Middle East, as a result of the important transmission project and energy management market contracts signed in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates last year. The level of sales in Algeria also increased significantly. T&D's level of trading decreased slightly in Europe and the Americas due principally to the lower short term orders received in product activities, when compared to the volume of system orders where the cycle time generally exceeds 12 months. Within Europe this trend has been particularly felt in Belgium, Sweden, Spain, and, in the Americas especially in Colombia, Venezuela and the US. However, Europe and the Americas remain T&D's main markets. In Mexico, sales were boosted by the trading of the SE410 and SE504 N.O projects and in the Netherlands Antilles by the Curacao contract from transmission projects. Total sales by the Services business represented just over 500 million in fiscal year 2003. T&D's sales in fiscal year 2002 increased by 12% compared with fiscal year 2001, on an actual basis, and by 8% on a comparable basis. This increase in sales was particularly strong in the Americas, due to the important energy management contracts signed in previous years in the US and continuing growth in Brazil. The Middle East increased, following the execution of transmission projects in
Kuwait and in the United Arab Emirates. Europe remained stable, with increases in Western Europe, Eastern Europe, and the UK offsetting declines in Germany. Operating income and operating margin T&D operating income amounted to 227 million in fiscal year 2003, compared with 226 million in fiscal year 2002, on an actual basis. The operating margin increased to 6.3% both on an actual and on a comparable basis. This increase in margin was the first result of better monitoring of overhead expenditure and of our cost reduction programmes, partly offset by continuing price pressure in some market segments. Systems activity improved as a result of tighter risk management, while profits from medium-voltage products were impacted by lower volumes. The operating margin decreased to 5.9% in fiscal year 2002 from 8.1% in fiscal year 2001, on an actual basis. That decrease in the operating margin was mainly attributable to price decreases in some market segments. Capital employed Capital employed amounted to 963 million at 31 March 2003, as compared with 1,044 million at 31 March 2002. This decrease was the result of tighter working capital management under our "Cash for Growth" programme.
TRANSPORT The following table sets forth some key financial and operating data for the Transport Sector:
(1) After 140 million of exceptional provisions. Orders received During fiscal year 2003, the major rail markets of the world continued to be generally buoyant with an average growth of 4% over fiscal year 2002. The following four major drivers in the rail transportation business have sustained this market growth: |X| Long deferred, replacement-driven demand cycles for rolling stock equipment and infrastructure, mainly in Europe and North America; |X| Urbanisation in developed and developing countries, where local transport operators seek solutions to ease automobile traffic congestion and to address environmental concerns through new metro and high speed train networks; |X| Higher rail network efficiency and safety requirements that accelerate the demand for network infrastructure upgrades and new signaling systems especially in Europe; and |X| Privatisations and deregulations that tend to redefine the core business activities of operators and to accelerate the outsourcing of rolling stock & infrastructure servicing.
Orders received by Transport in fiscal year 2003 increased by 4% compared with fiscal year 2002, on an actual basis. On a comparable basis, the increase was 17%. This strong growth was observed in all segments except for Intercity with low orders received particularly in locomotives. Transit was still the main segment in terms of volume of orders received, with an increase compared to last fiscal year, thanks mainly to the AB Transitio contract for 55 CORADIA (commuter trains). As a result of major orders received in the US, Rolling Stock America had an outstanding year as well as Service while Transport Information Solutions and Systems remained stable. By region, Europe remained the most significant market with 60% of the orders received by the Sector in fiscal year 2003. New countries also emerged this year: Sweden through 55 regional trains for service in the greater Stockholm area, Finland through 20 CORADIATM trains for traffic in Helsinki, Greece with the supply and construction of electrical and mechanical elements for a new suburban line between Athens and the new airport. However, orders received in the UK remained weak in the confused situation caused by the further re-organisation of the rail industry. America grew to 24% of orders received compared to 8% for the same period last year, the main contracts being: 400 new metro cars for New York City Transit, design and manufacture of 62 new heavy rail subway cars for WMATA in Washington and 135 new passenger rail coaches for the expanding New Jersey Transit fleet and BNSF - US maintenance of 434 GM diesel locomotives for 12 years. However, the service business in Montreal experienced a further year of poor order intake. The Asian market also increased, due to orders received in South Korea in connection with the project management and supply of equipment for a new airport railway link between Incheon and Seoul. Orders received by Transport in fiscal year 2002 increased by 11% on an actual basis. The growth in orders received was essentially due to the strong rolling stock and freight market, mainly in Europe, as well as to demand for our information solutions and systems which more than doubled. The higher activity level in Europe was mainly the result of the continued revival of the French market in rolling stock and freight, where we maintained our market share. However, the UK market was sluggish due to regulatory uncertainty. Order intake was also strong in Asia due to contracts in Singapore for the Circle Line Metro. Sales Sales in Transport increased by 15% in fiscal year 2003 compared with fiscal year 2002, on an actual basis, and by 27% on a comparable basis. The highest increase was registered in Intercity, Transit and Systems. Geographically, the major contributor to the increase was France, highlighted by high levels of deliveries to SNCF during fiscal year 2003. Other European countries remained stable. The Americas showed a slight decrease as a contribution to Transport's total sales but remained stable in volume. Asia remained stable at 15% of Transport's total sales during the year. Sales in Transport remained stable in fiscal year 2002 compared with fiscal year 2001, on an actual basis. In fiscal year 2002, Europe remained the most important market with relatively stable sales. Slower deliveries, related to problems encountered with the UK trains, were offset by increases in France and
Eastern Europe. Excluding the UK, sales in Europe increased by 25%, Germany, Spain and France having a positive impact. Sales decreased in the Americas due to difficulties in the freight service market in North America. Sales in Asia increased by 72% due to a Singapore metro contract and additional signaling contracts, notably in Australia. Operating income and operating margin Transport's operating income amounted to 49 million in fiscal year 2003, compared to 101 million in fiscal year 2002 on an actual basis and 83 million on a comparable basis. Operating margin declined to 1.0% in fiscal year 2003 as compared with 2.1% in fiscal year 2002, on a comparable basis. Intercity encountered significant difficulties with the Regional Trains contract and with the WCML project in the UK, additional gross provisions and accrued contract costs have been provided in fiscal year 2003 for 140 million, a part of which was applied during the fiscal year. Excluding this exceptional item, operating income and margin were respectively 189 million and 3.7% in fiscal year 2003. Operating income was affected adversely by low workload and related under-recoveries in the UK, Canada and the locomotive businesses, which will be addressed by restructuring the respective businesses. The operating margin declined to 2.3% in fiscal year 2002 versus a 6.0% operating margin in fiscal year 2001, on an actual basis. The major negative impact on operating income in that year resulted from problems involved with the UK trains contracts.
Capital employed Capital employed was 805 million at 31 March 2003, compared with 1,041 million at 31 March 2002, mainly due to the decrease in inventories and contracts in progress, particularly in the UK with the problems related to the deliveries of the UK Regional Trains and to down-payments following orders received. UK Trains In 1997, shortly after the privatisation of the British rail industry, we received five orders for a total of 119 new trains with an aggregate value of 670 million. These orders were part of the first series of orders following the rail deregulation in the UK. Following this deregulation the traditional roles and responsibilities for suppliers changed radically while the rail regulatory organisation established by the UK government was modified. We experienced significant delays in gaining regulatory approvals to the detailed specifications and in an attempt to meet our delivery commitments, we started production of these trains, in anticipation of receiving the necessary approvals. When the specifications were finalised, they differed from our expectations, which required costly and time consuming modifications. As a result, we did not meet our delivery schedule and began to face reliability issues on the trains. At the end of March 2002, we reported that difficulties had been encountered on these UK Regional Trains, and 29 of the 119 trains remained to be delivered out. Measures taken to address the various technical and contractual issues have enabled us to work with the operators and the rail authorities; 118 of the 119 trains ordered are now in service. Settlements have recently been agreed with our customers, under which we are obliged to implement programmes to ensure that all fleets achieve agreed levels of in-service reliability, which are ongoing and have led to some unexpected costs and revised estimated costs to complete such contracts and led us to take additional provisions. These commitments, which, in some instances, involve commitments for a number of years, have been provided for in fiscal year 2003. On the West Coast Main Line "WCML" contract, the project experienced major delays due to changing specifications and the high level of uncertainty regarding upgrading of the WCML route and infrastructure. Nevertheless, trains are currently being delivered at the rate of 2 a month in line with a revised programme agreed with our customer and the railway authorities. A restricted commercial service started at the beginning of the year, and 15 of the 53 trainsets have been delivered, with the remainder scheduled for delivery by September 2004. The initial operating experience has been well received. Clarification of the programme, infrastructure and operating environment has resulted in a reassessment of the costs to complete the contract and led us to take additional provisions. Further, strong action has been taken with the goal of ensuring that we meet our commitments including the strengthening of the management, and the addition of technical resources for both new build and service functions in the UK. In fiscal year 2003, we provided for additional gross provisions of 140 million to cover the expected future costs of the continuing improvement programme on the Regional Trains and to complete the WCML contract. Reference should be made to "Risk factors - Our products, including the GT24/GT26 heavy-duty gas
turbines and the UK Trains, often incorporate advance and complex technologies and sometimes require modifications after they have been delivered".
MARINE The following table sets forth some of the key financial and operating data for the Marine Sector:
All Marine operating facilities are located in France. Further, the business entities comprising the Marine business have not changed since last year. The figures are the same on both an actual and a comparable basis. Orders received In fiscal year 2003 as in fiscal year 2002, Marine's main market, cruise-ships, remained weak: |X| After the events of 11 September 2001, the cruise market had low profitability in 2001; |X| After the market's recovery, cruise operators, whose base currency is the US dollar, reacted to the unexpected decrease of the US dollar exchange rate against the Euro, from Spring 2002, by delaying new orders in the hope that the weakness of the dollar would not last; |X| The market was also stalled pending the outcome of take-over and merger discussions involving the three major cruise-shipowners, which finally lead to the merger of Carnival and P&O Princess at the end of fiscal year 2003; and |X| More recently, uncertainty has increased pending the outcome of the Iraq crisis.
As a consequence, Marine registered no new cruise-ship order in fiscal years 2003 and 2002, and overall a very low level of orders in fiscal year 2003, 163 million including orders for an oceanographic vessel for Ifremer and a 72-metre yacht, compared with 462 million in fiscal year 2002. Orders received in fiscal year 2002 comprised two orders for intervention and assault vessels for the French Navy (jointly built with DCN) and a 74,000 m³ LNG carrier for Gaz de France. Orders received in fiscal year 2001 had reached 1,835 million with four cruise-ship contracts (including the Queen Mary 2 cruise-liner) and a hydrographic and oceanographic vessel for the French Navy.
Sales Sales in Marine increased by 26% in fiscal year 2003 compared with fiscal year 2002 due to the high level of deliveries. Marine completed and delivered the following vessels in fiscal year 2003: |X| The cruise-ship European Stars to Festival Cruises, |X| The cruise-ship Constellation to R.C.C.L. for its Celebrity brand, |X| The cruise-ship Coral Princess to P&O Princess, |X| The hydrographic and oceanographic vessel BHO Beautemps-Beaupré to the French Navy, and |X| The cruise-ship MSC Lirica to M.S.C. In fiscal year 2003, Marine also progressed with the construction of other cruise ships (mainly Island Princess, Crystal Serenity, and the super cruise liner Queen Mary 2) for several shipowners, a second surveillance frigate for the Royal Moroccan Navy. Sales amounted to 1,240 million in fiscal year 2002 compared with 1,841 million in fiscal year 2001. This decrease resulted from an exceptionally high level of deliveries (6 cruise-ships) in fiscal year 2001 while fiscal year 2002 was affected by the postponement of the delivery of the cruise ship European Stars until the end of April 2002. In fiscal year 2002, Marine delivered two cruise-ships, the European Vision to Festival and the Summit to RCCL. In addition, Marine delivered a frigate to Morocco and two high-speed ferries to NEL lines in Greece. Operating income and operating margin Operating income amounted to 24 million in fiscal year 2003 compared with 47 million in fiscal year 2002. New shipbuilding contracts obtained since January 2001 were not entitled to any subsidy, and market prices have not increased. Operating income amounted to 80 million in fiscal year 2001, during which six cruise-ships were delivered. Capital employed Capital employed was (343) million at 31 March 2003, compared with 100 million at 31 March 2002. The decrease in fiscal year 2003 was a result of the favourable terms obtained for financing for the construction of the cruise-liner Queen Mary 2 compared with the cash profile of the contract. See Note 24 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Renaissance We undertook vendor financing in support of the recovery plan for the Marine Sector from fiscal year 1996 to fiscal year 1998, which helped us to obtain repeat orders for cruise-ships and increased the productivity of the shipyard. We provided guarantees to financial institutions relating to indebtedness incurred by certain purchasers of our cruise-ships and fast ferries.
At 31 March 2003, these guarantees related to a total of fourteen ships, including six cruise-ships delivered to Renaissance Cruises ("Renaissance") and eight ships for four other customers. In addition, two other cruise-ships were supplied to Renaissance Cruises without vendor financing. Renaissance filed for bankruptcy in September 2001. Thereafter, we and the lenders undertook actions to secure and maintain the ships and to restructure their financing. Our overall exposure to Renaissance vendor financing at 30 September 2001 was 684 million in guarantees of financing made in connection with the delivery of the six ships. As part of the restructuring, which was completed in fiscal year 2002, ownership of the six ships, including four that were previously owned by four special purpose leasing entities in which we had an interest, was transferred to subsidiaries of Cruiseinvest (Jersey) Ltd., an entity in which we own no shares. Cruiseinvest financed this acquisition principally through bank borrowings, guaranteed in part by us. In addition, we purchased subordinated limited recourse notes issued by Cruiseinvest, agreed to provide Cruiseinvest with a line of credit and met certain of our commitments under our pre-existing guarantees. Interest on the subordinated limited recourse notes is payable only from amounts remaining after satisfaction of payments due on Cruiseinvest's bank borrowings. In parallel, the remarketing of the ships commenced, with the objective to put the ships back into cruise operations as quickly as possible, through bare-boat or time charters, and eventually sell them to the new operators when normal conditions are restored on the second-hand market. One of these ships was chartered to Swan Hellenic, a subsidiary of P&O Princess and resumed operations in April 2003. Two of the ships will be operated from summer 2003 by Oceania Cruise, a new cruise-operator. Two others will also be operated from spring 2003 by Pulmantur, with possibilities of extension. A long-term lease is currently being finalised with a European operator for one ship, which should then resume cruise operations also from summer 2003. Two other ships have also been taken over by P&O Princess and resumed cruise operations in November and December 2002. Our overall exposure to Renaissance vendor financing was 368 million at 31 March 2003, as compared with 432 million at 31 March 2002. The reduction was mainly due to the decrease of the US Dollar in which most of our guarantees are expressed. In addition to our Renaissance "vendor financing exposure", our other outstanding Marine vendor financing guarantees amounted to 565 million at 31 March 2003, relating to six cruise-ships and two high-speed ferries for four different customers. Consequently, our total vendor financing exposure in relation to Marine amounted to 933 million at 31 March 2003 compared with 1,044 million at 31 March 2002. The last shipbuilding contract having benefited from any type of vendor financing came into force in November 1999. There is no other vendor financing arrangement or commitment relating to any contract in Marine's order backlog.
As a result of the foregoing, we recorded a provision of 140 million at 31 March 2003 to cover risks associated with Marine vendor financing, a slight decrease from the 144 million provision at 31 March 2002.
OTHER "Other" comprises all units accounting for Corporate costs, the International Network and the overseas entities in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa (prior to its disposal) and India, that are not reported by Sectors. For fiscal years 2002 and 2001, the former Contracting Sector contribution is classified in "Other" in the table presented above in "Change in business composition and presentation of our accounts, non-GAAP measures - Comparable basis". Operating income included Corporate costs as well as the contribution of the International Network and the overseas entities, and included in fiscal years 2002 and 2001 the contribution of the former Contracting Sector on an actual basis. On a comparable basis, operating income was (44) million in fiscal year 2003, compared with (27) million and (51) million in fiscal years 2002 and 2001. All restructuring costs are recorded against the EBIT of "Other" and not the EBIT of the Sectors. Capital employed in "Others" was 1,208 million at 31 March 2003, and consisted mainly of loans and cash deposits in respect of Marine vendor financing, pensions, prepaid assets and other long-term deposits. See Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDING 31 MARCH 2001, 2002, 2003 INCOME STATEMENT The following table sets out, on a consolidated basis, the elements of our operating income both on an actual and on a comparable basis for the Group as a whole:
(1) After 1,300 million of exceptional provisions. Sales Sales were 21,351 million in fiscal year 2003, compared with 23,453 million in fiscal year 2002, a decrease of 9%, due principally to exchange rate variations and to the disposal of Contracting and GTRM. Sales increased by 1%, on a comparable basis. The decrease in Power and, to a lesser extent in T&D, was compensated by a significant increase in both Transport and Marine. Sales were 23,453 million in fiscal year 2002, compared with 24,550 million in fiscal year 2001, a decrease of 4%. On a comparable basis, sales were stable from fiscal year 2001 to fiscal year 2002, during which Power achieved an increase of 4% in sales and T&D an increase of 6%. Transport was stable and the decline in Marine reflected the timing of ship deliveries, as one ship was delivered in April 2002, and another mid-May 2002, after the close of the fiscal year.
Percentage of services in sales increased to 23% in fiscal year 2003, compared with 22% and 19% in fiscal year 2002 and 2001 when Contracting and GTRM are excluded. No single customer represented more than 10% of our sales in any year of the last three-year period discussed.
Cost of sales Our cost of sales consists primarily of labour, raw materials and components, transport and freight, and production overheads, including depreciation. Cost of sales also includes provisions for risks and charges related to contracts, such as warranty claims, contract losses and project penalties. However, because of the diversity of the cost structure of our various activities, we analyse the items that make up cost of sales only by business or by contract and do not analyse these items at a consolidated level. Our cost of sales amounted to 19,114 million in fiscal year 2003 compared with 19,623 million and 20,428 million in fiscal years 2002 and 2001, respectively. This decline was due generally to the lower level of sales. Selling and Administrative expenses Selling and administrative expenses were 2,049 million in fiscal year 2003 compared with 2,314 million in fiscal year 2002 and 2,342 million in fiscal year 2001 on an actual basis. On a comparable basis, selling and administrative expenses decreased by 62 million compared with fiscal year 2002. As a percentage of sales, they decreased from 10.0% to 9.6%. This reduction resulted from synergies, the impact of restructuring and from actions launched to reduce costs under our Quality Focus 6-Sigma programme. We expect these savings will be amplified by the introduction of further restructuring programmes in the years to come. Research and Development expenses Research and Development expenses were 622 million in fiscal year 2003, increasing compared with 575 million in fiscal year 2002 on an actual basis, mainly due to increased spending on gas turbines. They decreased in fiscal year 2002 compared with 629 million in fiscal year 2001 on an actual basis, but remained stable on a comparable basis. Operating income and operating margin Operating income is measured before restructuring costs, goodwill and other acquired intangible assets, amortisation expenses and other items, which include foreign exchange gains and losses, gains and losses on sales of assets, pension costs and employee profit sharing and before taxes, interest income and expenses. Operating margin is calculated by dividing the operating income by the total annual sales. Operating income and operating margin were (434) million and -2.0% in fiscal year 2003, as compared with 941 million and 4.0% in fiscal year 2002, on an actual basis. In March 2003, exceptional gross provisions of 1,160 million were recorded for the GT24/GT26 heavy-duty gas turbines and 140 million for UK trains. Excluding these provisions, operating income and operating margin were respectively 866 million and 4.1% in fiscal year 2003. Our operating margin in
in fiscal year 2003 reflected the increased level of margin in our order backlog, better cost control and the first results of the restructuring launched, offset by the negative financial effects of the GT24/GT26 gas turbines and UK Trains problems and by adverse effects in Transport of low workload and related under-recoveries in the UK, Canada and the locomotive business. Operating margin of 4.0% in fiscal year 2002 decreased compared with 4.7% fiscal year 2001, on an actual basis. This decrease was mainly due to a significant decrease in T&D operating margin as a result of pricing pressure, a significant decrease in Transport operating margin due to delivery issues on our UK regional trains contracts and a decrease in sales volume and margins in Marine. This was despite continued operating profit improvements in Power, as cost savings and an increased focus on higher added-value activities led to higher operating income in that Sector. Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) EBIT is calculated as operating income less other income (expenses) net and the amortisation of other intangible assets. Goodwill amortisation is accounted for below the EBIT line item in our income statement. Other income (expenses) net comprises net gains or losses on disposal of fixed assets and investments, restructuring costs, pension costs, employee profit-sharing and other non-operating income/expenses. EBIT was (1,056) million in fiscal year 2003, compared with 487 million in fiscal year 2002, on an actual basis. The decrease in EBIT was due to: |X| The decrease in operating income as a result of the aggregate exceptional gross provisions of 1,300 million in fiscal year 2003. |X| Exceptional net capital gains of 107 million (capital gains on the sale of Contracting for 106 million and GTRM for 43 million, capital loss of 42 million on the sale of parts of our waste-to-energy business) in fiscal year 2002, compared with a net capital loss of 6 million for the disposal of investments and real estate assets in fiscal year 2003. |X| Restructuring costs of 268 million in fiscal year 2003, compared with 227 million in fiscal year 2002. The increase in fiscal year 2003 was due to the continuing Group-wide cost rationalisation and downsizing. During the year, restructuring plans have been incurred principally in France, Germany and the United Kingdom to reduce production capacity and adapt to current market conditions in order to ensure continuing competitiveness in the three main Sectors of the Group. Restructuring costs are accrued when management announces the reduction or closure of facilities, or a programme to reduce the workforce and when related costs are precisely determined. Such costs include employees' severance and termination benefits, estimated facility closing costs and write-off of assets. |X| Pension costs of 214 million in fiscal year 2003, compared with 139 million in fiscal year 2002. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the amortisation of the unrecognised actuarial difference
between pension obligations and the fair market value of the assets following the fall in the global stock market, and to exceptional profits in fiscal year 2002. EBIT was 487 million in fiscal year 2002, compared with 931 million in fiscal year 2001. The decrease in EBIT in fiscal year 2002 was due to: |X| The decrease in operating income in Transport, T&D and Marine, partially offset by Power. |X| Restructuring costs for fiscal year 2002 of 227 million versus 81 million for fiscal year 2001. The increase in these costs in fiscal year 2002 was mainly due to continued Group-wide cost rationalisation, especially product rationalisation, streamlining manufacturing and optimising staffing levels and because restructuring costs in Power were provided for when the Joint Venture ABB ALSTOM Power was created. |X| Pension expenses of 139 million in fiscal year 2002 compared to 112 million in fiscal year 2001. The increase in fiscal year 2002 was due to increased contributions to multi-employer and defined contribution schemes, primarily in the US. |X| Exceptional capital gains in fiscal year 2002 compared to no significant capital gain in fiscal year 2001.
Financial income (expenses), net The improvement of our financial expenses, 270 million in fiscal year 2003 compared with 294 million in fiscal year 2002, was due to a decrease in market interest rates and net gains on exchange-rate variations mainly resulting from the unwinding of forward sale contracts of US dollars against euros following the reassessment of the financing structure in the US, partially offset by an increase in financial debt. Our net financial expenses in fiscal year 2002 were 294 million, compared with 207 million in fiscal year 2001. The major impact on financial expenses for fiscal year 2002 was mainly the higher net interest expense due to the higher level of net debt as well as the increase in other financial items, which consisted principally of fees paid on bonds, guarantees and credit lines. Income tax The income tax credit was 241 million for the fiscal year 2003, at an effective rate of 18.2%. In fiscal year 2003, we recognised deferred income for 394 million, partly due to exceptional provisions. Current income tax for the fiscal year was (153) million. Income tax expenses for fiscal year 2002 were 10 million at an effective rate of 5.2%, compared with 174 million in fiscal year 2001. The low expense in fiscal year 2002 was due to a current income tax expense of 97 million (lower than in previous years due to decreased operating income), which was significantly offset by deferred tax income of 87 million. Share in net income (loss) of equity investments Our share in net income (loss) of equity investments was 3 million in fiscal year 2003 compared with 1 million in fiscal year 2002 and (4) million in fiscal year 2001. Dividend on redeemable preference shares of a subsidiary Our dividend on redeemable preference shares of a subsidiary has been reclassified in financial income (expenses) net, in fiscal year 2003 due to the reclassification of the redeemable preference shares as financial debt. The dividend paid was 13 million in fiscal year 2003, thereby impacting the financial income, and 14 million in fiscal year 2002 impacting the dividend item in our income statement. Minority interests Minority interests were (15) million in fiscal year 2003 compared with (23) million in fiscal year 2002 and (37) million in fiscal year 2001. Goodwill amortisation Goodwill amortisation amounted to 284 million in fiscal year 2003 compared with 286 million in fiscal year 2002 and 305 million in fiscal year 2001. The
slight decrease in fiscal year 2002 when compared with fiscal year 2001 was mainly due to the disposals of Contracting and GTRM. Net income (loss) The net loss in fiscal year 2003 amounted to 1,381 million, compared with a net loss of 139 million in fiscal year 2002 and a net income of 204 million in fiscal year 2001.
BALANCE SHEET Goodwill, net Goodwill, net decreased to 4,440 million at 31 March 2003 compared to 4,612 million at 31 March 2002 due to the net effect of the acquisition of the remaining 49% of Fiat Ferroviaria in April 2002 (157 million) offset by the related amortisation (284 million). See Note 7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Goodwill, net decreased to 4,612 million at 31 March 2002 compared to 5,310 million at 31 March 2001. This reduction was due to the annual amortisation of goodwill (286 million) and the disposal of Contracting (681 million), partly offset by an increase in goodwill related to a decrease in our valuation of the net assets acquired from ABB (198 million) in Power, following final determination of the purchase price allocation made in connection with the acquisitions. Working capital Working capital (defined as current assets less current liabilities and provisions for risks and charges) at 31 March 2003 was (4,819) million compared with (4,545) million as reported at 31 March 2002. This variation was due to a tighter working capital management, despite a decrease in total provisions for risks and charges. Changes to working capital are presented in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Net effects on working capital due to foreign currency translation were positive by 135 million in fiscal year 2003. See Note 16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Working capital amounted to (4,545) million at 31 March 2002 versus (4,978) million at 31 March 2001. The variation was due to the sale of our former Contracting Sector and to the continuous optimisation of asset management throughout the Group. Customer deposits and advances On average we estimate that 40% of our contracts relate to "Long-Term Projects", defined as those projects which are completed over more than one year, 25% relate to products or individual items of equipment typically supplied within one year, and the remaining 35% is split between long-term service agreements and short-term contracts such as the supply of spares and service and overhauls of equipment. Our long-term projects are principally in Power, Transport and Marine. Customer deposits and advances include the preliminary advances by customers as well as customers' progress payments during the construction of the project as contractually agreed. Taking customer advances serves in part to provide us with working capital to finance the execution of our projects. Obtaining customer deposits and advances assists us in managing the following risks:
|X| Risk of negative cash flow while performing the contract; |X| Risk of payment default due to client credit risk, which is mitigated via larger down payments and progress payments; and |X| Foreign exchange risks. We record customer deposits and advances on our balance sheet upon receipt as gross customer deposits and advances. The gross amounts were 12,689 million, 14,159 million and 12,767 million at 31 March 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively. At the balance sheet date, we apply these deposits first to reduce any related gross accounts receivable and then to reduce any inventories and contracts in progress relating to the project for which we received the deposit or advance. Any remaining deposit or advance is recorded as "Customer deposits and advances" on our balance sheet as described in Note 24 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. As of 31 March 2003, our net customer deposits and advances were 3,541 million, compared with 4,221 million as of 31 March 2002, and 6,205 million as of 31 March 2001. The decrease of our customer cash deposits and advances of 680 million which occurred during fiscal year 2003 was the result of a decrease due to translation effects for 589 million, and of a net decrease by 91 million. This decrease was mainly the net effect of a decrease in Power and an increase in Transport both in line with percentages of variations in orders received on a comparable basis. Provisions for risks and charges At 31 March 2003, the provisions for risks and charges were 3,631 million compared with 3,849 million at 31 March 2002. This net decrease was accounted for by the following movements: |X| a decrease of 655 million due to the application of provisions for risks and charges on the GT24/GT26 gas turbines (and by 415 million of accrued contract costs); |X| an increase of 1,058 million due to the addition of provisions on the GT24/GT26 gas turbines (and by 102 million of accrued contract costs); |X| a decrease in provisions on contracts of 316 million; |X| a decrease in restructuring provisions and other provisions of 78 million; and |X| a decrease of 227 million in foreign currency translation effects, change in scope and other adjustments. Shareholders' Equity Shareholders' equity at 31 March 2003 was 900 million, including minority interests, compared with1,843 million at 31 March 2002. This decrease was mainly due to: |X| the net loss for the period of 1,381 million; |X| the negative impact of cumulative translation adjustments, mainly due to the evolution of the New Mexican Peso and the Pound Sterling against the Euro of 188 million;
|X| partly offset by the capital increase of 622 million. At 31 March 2002, shareholders' equity, including minority interests, amounted to 1,843 million versus 2,192 million at 31 March 2001. The decrease was due to the net loss for fiscal year 2002, the payment of dividends for fiscal year 2001 and the negative impact of the cumulative translation adjustments. See the "Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity" table in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Financial debt, Net debt and Economic debt Securitisation of existing receivables In order to fund our activity, we sell selected existing trade receivables within which we irrevocably and without any recourse transfer eligible receivables to a third party. The net cash proceeds from securitisation of existing trade receivables at 31 March 2003 was 357 million compared with 1,036 million at 31 March 2002 and 894 million at 31 March 2001. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Securitisation of future receivables In order to finance working capital and to mitigate the cash-negative profiles of some contracts, we sell to third parties selected future receivables due from our customers. This securitisation of future receivables has the benefit of reducing our exposure to customers and applies principally to Marine and Transport. The total securitisation of future receivables at 31 March 2003 was 1,292 million compared with 1,735 million at 31 March 2002 and 1,578 million at 31 March 2001. The decrease in fiscal year 2003 compared with fiscal year 2002 is due to the low level of orders received in Marine. See Note 22 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Financial debt Our financial debt was 6,331 million at 31 March 2003, compared with 6,035 million at 31 March 2002. Our financial debt increased notably due to the reclassification of preference shares by 205 million, and the reclassification of undated subordinated notes by 250 million. See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Net debt We define net debt as financial debt less short-term investments, cash and cash equivalents. Net debt was 4,561 million at 31 March 2003, compared with 3,799 million at 31 March 2002. Our net debt increased notably due to the decrease of our cash and cash equivalents, the reclassification of preference shares by 205 million, and the reclassification of undated subordinated notes by 250 million. See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Economic debt Our Economic debt is defined in "Change in business composition and presentation of our accounts, non-GAAP measures - Use and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures". Our Economic debt was 4,918 million at 31 March 2003, compared with 5,290 million at 31 March 2002, a decrease of 372 million.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS The following table sets out selected figures concerning our consolidated statement of cash flows:
Net cash provided by operating activities Net cash provided by operating activities is defined as the net income after elimination of non-cash items plus working capital movements. Net cash provided by operating activities was (537) million in fiscal year 2003 compared to (579) million in fiscal year 2002 and 184 million in fiscal year 2001. Net income after elimination of non-cash items was (1,014) million in fiscal year 2003. This amount represents the cash generated by the net income before working capital movements. As provisions are included in the definition of our working capital, provisions are not part of the elimination of non-cash items. So, excluding the exceptional addition of gross provisions for 1,300 million on the GT24/GT26 gas turbines and on the UK Trains, the net income after elimination of non-cash items was positive by 286 million. Change in net working capital generated a net positive cash flow of 477 million. The principal movements in working capital were due to: |X| A decrease of 650 million in trade and other receivables, mainly in Power and to a lesser extent in Marine and T&D. Power benefited from a significant reduction in advances paid to suppliers as a consequence of the completion of particularly large contracts. Thanks to the working capital management programme, the Group has also achieved a strong decrease in trade receivables overdue.
|X| A decrease of 661 million in sale of trade receivables (securitisation of existing receivables). |X| A decrease of 415 million in inventories and contracts in progress, and trade receivables, mainly in Power and Transport. |X| An increase of 87 million in contract-related provisions and accrued contract costs. In particular, 1,070 million relating to the GT24/GT26 gas turbines was applied in fiscal year 2003, but was offset by the elimination of the provision of 1,160 million because it had no cash effect in the period. |X| A decrease of 98 million in customer deposits and advances, mainly in Power and T&D, partly offset by an increase in Transport and Marine due to favourable financing terms obtained for the construction of the Queen Mary 2. Free cash flow The following table sets forth our free cash flow.
Capital expenditures were 410 million for the fiscal year 2003, compared with 550 million in fiscal year 2002. Our capital expenditures relate principally to acquisitions of machinery, equipment, tools and fixtures for maintaining our manufacturing base. The decrease was mainly related to the disposal of Contracting and GTRM during fiscal year 2002. Free cash flow was (265) million in fiscal year 2003 compared with (1,151) million in fiscal year 2002. These amounts included cash outflows resulting from: |X| the GT24/GT26 issue of (1,055) million in fiscal year 2003 and (700) million in fiscal year 2002; and |X| over-financed contracts for (222) million and (607) million in fiscal years 2003 and 2002. Large contracts obtained prior to fiscal year 2002 provided substantial up-front payments to Power on three such contracts and to Transport on one contract.
Excluding these cash outflows, our Free cash flow would have been 1,012 million in fiscal year 2003, compared with 156 million in fiscal year 2002. Net cash provided by investing activities Net cash used by investing activities was (341) million in fiscal year 2003. This amount comprised: |X| proceeds of 252 million from disposals of property, plant and equipment (including 231 million from the disposals of real estate); |X| capital expenditures of 410 million; |X| decrease (increase) in other fixed assets of (55) million; |X| cash expenditures for the acquisition of investments, net of net cash acquired, totalling (166) million, which included (154) million for the acquisition of the remaining 49% of Fiat Ferroviaria Spa in April 2002; and |X| cash proceeds from the sale of investments, net of net cash sold, of 38 million. Net cash provided by investing activities was 123 million in fiscal year 2002 compared with (1,590) million in fiscal year 2001. The net cash inflow was due to 772 million from sale of investments, principally Contracting for 689 million and GTRM for 66 million and 118 million from disposals of plant and equipment. Capital expenditures were (550) million. Cash expenditures for acquisition of investments, net of net cash acquired, was (113) million and cash outflow from increases in fixed assets was (104) million. Net cash provided by financing activities Net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal year 2003 was 621 million, mainly due to the capital increase of 622 million conducted in July 2002. Net cash used in financing activities for fiscal year 2002 was 136 million, due to dividends paid, including dividends paid to minority interests of 18 million. Decrease (increase) in net debt Our net debt increased by 762 million in fiscal year 2003, compared with 588 million in fiscal year 2002. MATURITY AND LIQUIDITY In the context of our new strategy and action plan, and in order to cover our liquidity needs in 2003, we have signed a 600 million new bridge facility with a group of core banks. We have also agreed with a sub-group of these banks to extend the maturity under an existing club deal and under two bilateral facilities maturing in March and April 2003, and representing an aggregate amount of 475 million. The purpose of both the new bridge facility and the extended facilities is to allow us to meet our short-term liquidity needs pending the disposals of assets contemplated under our plan in the fiscal year
2004. The bridge facility will mature in December 2003 and the extended facilities will mature in January 2004. Proceeds from the disposals of assets foreseen in our plan must, subject to certain exceptions and thresholds, first be used to repay and cancel the bridge facility and, subsequently, the extended facilities. The borrower under the bridge and the extended facilities is ALSTOM. They are unsecured facilities, ranking pari passu with ALSTOM's other revolving credit facilities. We have also recently amended the maturity of our outstanding 250 million undated subordinated notes, to September 2006. These notes will remain subordinated in nature. Both the bridge and the extended credit facilities are maintained subject to our compliance with a new set of financial covenants. This new set of covenants is also now in effect with respect to two other existing syndicated revolving credit facilities (totalling commitments of 1,250 million and 977 million, respectively). For details of these covenants, please refer to Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, under the bridge and extended facilities, the lending banks may request their early repayment in full or in part if our shareholders do not approve resolutions at our next annual general meeting authorising the Board of Directors to conduct a capital increase by way of a rights issue. Please see "Risk Factors - Our existing lines of credit and certain of our other financing agreements contain financial covenants that we may be unable to meet." The maturities of the committed and uncommitted funds available to the Group are as follows:
(1) Numerous lines at subsidiary level prudently considered as non-committed and short term. (2) Rolled over.
(3) The reimbursement of future receivables securitised comes from the direct payment of our customer to the investor to which we sold the right to receive the payment. This reimbursement has no cash impact for us. Total available unused credit lines together with cash available in the Group amounted to 2,370 million at 31 March 2003, compared with 3,896 million at 31 March 2002. This amount comprised: |X| Available lines at parent Group level, which amounted to 600 million at 31 March 2003, compared with 1,660 million at 31 March 2002. |X| Cash available at parent Group level was 610 million at 31 March 2003, compared with 167 million at 31 March 2002. |X| Cash available at subsidiary level of 1,160 million at 31 March 2003, compared with 2,069 million at 31 March 2002. ALSTOM, the parent company, has access to cash in subsidiaries, which are fully-owned, although local constraints can delay this access. Our policy is to centralise liquidity of subsidiaries at ALSTOM level. This centralisation is one of the reasons for the decrease in cash available at subsidiary level between 31 March 2002 and 31 March 2003. Our other sources of cash include proceeds from sale of trade receivables ("securitisation of existing receivables"), securitisation of future receivables and customer deposits, described in this Section of the Annual Report.
PENSION ACCOUNTING We provide various types of retirement, termination and post-retirement benefits (including healthcare and medical) to our employees. The type of benefits offered to an individual employee is related to local legal requirements as well as the historical operating practices of the specific subsidiaries and involves us in the operation of, or participation in, various retirement plans. These plans are either defined-contribution, defined-benefit or multi-employer plans. Defined contribution plans For the defined-contribution plans, we pay contributions to independently administered funds at a fixed percentage of employees' pay. The pension costs in respect of defined-contribution plans are charged in the income statement as operating expenses and represent the contributions paid by the Company to these funds. Defined-benefit plans These plans mainly cover retirement and termination benefits and post-retirement medical benefits. For the defined benefit plans, which we operate, benefits are normally based on an employee's pensionable remuneration and length of service. These plans are either externally funded through independently administered pension funds or unfunded. Pension liabilities are assessed annually by external professionally qualified actuaries. These actuarial assessments are carried out for each plan using the Projected Unit method with a measurement date of 31 December. The financial and demographic assumptions used are determined at the measurement date by us to be appropriate for the plan and the country in which it is situated. The most important assumptions made are listed below: |X| Discount rate; |X| Inflation rate; |X| Rate of salary increases; |X| Long-term rate of return on plan assets; |X| Mortality rates; and |X| Employee turnover rates. Certain assumptions used are discussed in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The assets of externally-funded defined-benefit plans are invested mainly in equity and debt securities. The components of these assets are disclosed in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The expected costs of providing retirement pensions under defined-benefit plans, as well as the costs of other post-retirement benefit plans, are charged to the profit and loss account over the periods benefiting from the employees' services. Valuation of the Projected Benefit Obligation The present value of the future obligations of the employer (Projected Benefit Obligation - "PBO") fluctuates annually, depending upon the following: |X| Increases related to the acquisition by the employees of one additional year of rights ("service cost"); |X| Increase in the present value of the PBO which arises because the benefits are one year closer to their payment dates ("interest cost"); |X| Decreases related to the benefits paid during the year; |X| Changes related to modifications of the actuarial assumptions (discount rate, inflation rate, rate of salary increases etc); |X| Changes in obligations related to plan amendments; and |X| Changes due to curtailments or settlements applied on the plans. The change in the PBO is disclosed in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Valuation of plan assets The fair value of the assets held by each plan is the amount that the plan could reasonably expect to receive in a current sale of the assets between a willing buyer and a willing seller. This is compared with the PBO and the difference is referred to as the "funded status" of the plan. The changes in the fair value of assets and the funded status are disclosed in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Actuarial gains and losses A number of factors can trigger actuarial gains and losses: |X| Differences between the assumptions used and the actual experience (for instance, an actual return on assets differing from the expected rate of return at the beginning of the year); |X| Changes in the long-term actuarial assumptions (inflation rate, discount rate, rate of salary escalation, mortality table etc); |X| Changes due to plan amendments; and |X| Impact of the first application of the actuarial methodology. The impact of these factors is shown in the table entitled "Change in plan assets" in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements: |X| Unrecognised actuarial loss (gain); |X| Unrecognised actuarial prior service cost (due to plan amendments); and
|X| Unrecognised actuarial transition. The unrecognised actuarial loss (gain) at the year-end is compared on a plan-by-plan basis with the higher of the PBO and the fair value of the assets held. If the unrecognised actuarial loss (gain) exceeds 10% of this amount the excess above the 10 % level is spread across the remaining working lives of the employees of the respective plan. As of 31 March 2003, the actuarial losses unrecognised in the balance sheet were 967 million, an increase of 427 million since March 2002, caused by the decline in world financial markets as the underlying assets of the funds are held substantially in equities (57%). Recognition of these liabilities under French GAAP is allowed over the average remaining working lives of the relevant participants. Thus, starting with fiscal year 2004, the portion above 10 % calculated scheme by scheme, will be spread across the average residual working period of these plans, being 12-15 years. The fluctuations in the financial markets since April 2002 will thus have no impact on the earnings at 31 March 2003 but will impact pensions cost and thus earnings at 31 March 2004 and possibly beyond. The unrecognised losses on actuarial prior service costs and unrecognised gains on actuarial transition amounted to 10 million and 22 million respectively, at 31 March 2003. The total amount is amortised on a straight-line basis over the remaining working lives of the plans' participants. Pension Cost The total pension cost related to defined benefit is defined annually by qualified actuaries and is detailed in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements as follows: |X| Service cost, which corresponds to the acquisition of one additional year of rights; |X| Expected interest cost, which is due to the increase in the present value of the PBO which arises because the benefits are one period closer to their payment dates; |X| Expected return on plan assets; |X| Cost (or potentially profit) corresponding to the amortisation of prior service cost; |X| Cost (or potentially profit) corresponding to the amortisation of actuarial gains and losses; and |X| Profit (or potentially cost) of Curtailments / Settlements corresponding to the impact of a reduction/cancellation of the obligation mainly due to a modification of the plan's scope (downsizing, business disposals, closing of a defined-benefits plan, etc). Multi-employer plans We employ workers from US Trade Unions mainly in our Customer Service activity related to the Boilers Segment after-market.
The pension costs charged in the income statement as "other expenses - Pension costs" represent contributions payable by us to these dedicated funds.
OFF BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS OFF BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS The following table sets forth our off-balance sheet commitments, which are discussed further at Note 27(a) to the Consolidated Financial Statements:
Guarantees related to contracts Guarantees related to contracts at 31 March 2003 exist with respect to bonds, guarantees and indemnities entered into in the ordinary course of our business. It is customary in the energy and transport industry for suppliers such as us to post bid bonds, advance payment bonds, performance bonds, warranty bonds and surety bonds. In posting such bonds, we are required to seek out third parties (bank and insurance companies) to issue bonds as a condition to entering into commercial contracts with our clients. Bid bonds are given at tender or bid submission stage and are usually released once the equipment or service supply contracts become effective. If the tender does not succeed the bonds are cancelled. Performance bonds are issued to assure the customer of our commitment to the contract performance until fulfilment of the contractual obligations. They are usually released at acceptance of the system or product delivered. Warranty or retention bonds are given to cover risks to the customer following acceptance of the equipment during the warranty period. The amount of such bonds is often significant, averaging in total 20% of the price of the contracts signed. The average maturity of these bonds varies as a function both of the nature of the bond issued and the Sector for which it is requested. For the Group taken as a whole, the average maturity is slightly above 3 years. Where circumstances arise that result in the threat of the calling of a bond, we seek to negotiate acceptable alternative arrangements. Bonds are typically called only when there is no other remedy acceptable to the customer. In these
circumstances, we may occasionally make repayment to the provider of the bond and continue negotiations with our customer. Our experience, however, is that bonds are very rarely called. In general, we establish provisions to cover any anticipated loss arising from our contractual obligations. The overall amount given as guarantees on contracts reduced from 11,451 million in March 2002 to 9,465 million in March 2003, a decrease by 17% mainly due to exchange rate variations and to the decrease of our orders in hand by 8% on a comparable basis (and 7% due to exchange rates). The ratio bonds on orders in hand remained stable. In fiscal year 2003, we faced a significant reduction in the bonding capacity of the market generally. There are two significant reasons behind this reduction: |X| The events of 11 September 2001 resulted in a large number of claims which affected the re-insurance market and consequently impacted its capacity to support the surety bond providers; and |X| The consequence of major bankruptcies in the US resulted in significant calls of bonds issued by surety providers. Rating agencies have consequently advised the surety bond providers to limit their individual exposure to any single customer to levels far below their existing commitments. This has led their providers to reduce or stop any further bond issuances in order to maintain their credit rating. Simultaneously, new regulatory constraints affecting banks and the deterioration of our credit profile have resulted in a higher pricing for these instruments, and reduced available market capacity. In view of the above, we are examining with our bankers and insurers the means to ensure alternative bonding capacity. See also "Risk Factors - Difficulties in securing bonds may jeopardise our ability to obtain new orders." Vendor Financing Exposure In some instances, we have provided financial support to institutions which finance some of our customers and also, in some cases, directly to our customers for their purchases of our products. We refer to this financial support as "vendor financing". We have decided that we will no longer provide any additional vendor financing guarantees to our customers. Vendor financing totalled 1,259 million at 31 March 2003 (of which 749 million was off balance sheet) compared to 1,493 million at 31 March 2002 (of which 932 million was off balance sheet). The decrease is mainly due to exchange-rate translation effects. See Note 27(a) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details in respect of vendor financing exposure.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS The following table sets our long-term rental, capital and operating lease obligations. See Note 27(b) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgements that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of commitments and contingencies, including financing arrangements. On a regular, ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those relating to projects, products, parts and other after-market operations, and included in accrued contract costs, provisions for risks and charges, bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, including goodwill and other acquired intangibles, taxation including deferred tax assets and liabilities, warranty obligations, restructuring, long-term service contracts, pensions and other post-retirement benefits, commitments, contingencies and litigation. Estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgements about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different circumstances, assumptions or conditions. Accounting policies important to an understanding of the financial statements include business combinations, consolidation methods, goodwill, other acquired intangible assets and restructuring that may be subject to the application of differing accounting principles. We believe the following critical accounting policies are most affected by our judgements and estimates in preparing our consolidated financial statements. Revenue recognition We recognise revenue and profit as work in progress progresses on long-term, fixed-price contracts using the percentage of completion method, based on contract milestones or costs incurred (See Note 2(d) to the Consolidated Financial Statements), which relies on estimates of total expected contract revenue and cost. We follow this method because we believe we can make reasonably dependable estimates of the revenue and costs applicable to various defined stages, or milestones, of a contract. Recognised revenues and profit taken are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion. Revisions to profit estimates are charged to income in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. When we book revenue, we also book certain contract costs (including direct materials and labour costs and indirect costs related to the contract) so that the contract margin, on a cumulative basis, equals the total contract gross margin determined in the latest project review. Selling and administrative expenses are charged to expenses as incurred. If a project review indicates a negative gross margin, we recognise the entire expected loss on the contract when we identify the negative gross margin. Estimates of future costs reflect our current best estimate of the probable outflow of financial resources that will be required to settle contractual obligations. These estimates are assessed on a contract-by-contract basis. We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognised. Our warranty obligations are affected by product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting any failures.
Should actual failure rates, material usage or service delivery cost of the products differ from current estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required. The introduction of technologically advanced products exposes us to risk of product failure significantly beyond the terms of standard contractual warranties applying to suppliers of equipment only. Should adverse changes to product failure rates occur, additional cost to complete may be required and result in actual financial consequences different from our estimates. Inventories We write down our inventories for estimated obsolescence or unmarketability in an amount equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favourable than those we project, additional inventory write-downs may be required. Doubtful accounts We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts, for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial conditions of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances could be required. Impairment of fixed assets and valuation of deferred tax assets We review our fixed assets, both tangible and intangible, on an annual basis and record an impairment charge when we believe an asset has experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results from underlying assets could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the assets that may not be reflected in the current carrying value. This could require us to record an impairment charge in the future. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realised. We take into account future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. If we were to determine that we would be able to realise our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset, which would increase income in the period that such determination was made. Likewise, should we determine that we would not be able to realise all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made. Pension benefits We sponsor pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering substantially all employees who meet eligibility requirements. Several statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events are used
in calculating the expense and liability related to the plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases as determined by us, within certain guidelines. In addition, our actuarial consultants also use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates to estimate these factors. The actuarial assumptions we use may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences could result in a significant change to the amount of pension expense recorded. Other significant accounting policies Other significant accounting policies are important to an understanding of the financial statements. Policies related to purchase accounting, consolidation policies, provisions and financial debt require difficult judgements on complex matters that are often subject to multiple sources of authoritative guidance.
SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN FRANCE AND IN THE US As a foreign registrant on the New York Stock Exchange, we prepare a reconciling table of net income and shareholders' equity from French GAAP to US GAAP for inclusion in our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). US GAAP financial statements are not available at the time we file our Annual Report with the Commission des opérations de bourse (COB). The main differences related to net income, liabilities and shareholders' equity are as follows: Accounting for restructuring costs -- The conditions under which a liability can be recorded are different than those that prevail under French GAAP. We record a liability related to a restructuring plan whenever the plan is finalized, approved by management and announced before the closing of the financial statements. In US GAAP, exit costs are accrued as a liability when an announcement is made to employees prior to the closing date. In addition, some costs that are recorded as restructuring costs under French GAAP are classified under cost of goods sold in US GAAP (inventories write off which result from restructuring plans). Valuation and accounting of financial instruments--Under French GAAP, profit and losses on financial instruments considered as hedges of our interest rate and forward exchange rate risks are recorded in the same period as the hedged item. The US standard SFAS 133, which is applicable to us from 1 April 2001, requires that all derivatives are recorded at their fair values in the balance sheet. The change in fair value of these derivatives is recorded in the income statement. If, under certain criteria, the derivative is qualified as a hedge, the effect in the income statement resulted from the change in fair values is compensated by the income or loss generated by the change of the value of the underlying item. Business combination -- The allocation of purchase price to assets and liabilities acquired or assumed following an acquisition can be revised under French GAAP until the end of the fiscal year following the fiscal year of an acquisition, whereas, according to US GAAP, such revision can only be made until the end of the fiscal year in which the acquisition occurred. This difference in principles may result in material differences between goodwill recorded under each set of norms. Stock compensation -- Under US GAAP, employee compensation may have to be recorded in the income statement following the issuance of employee stock-based instruments. Financial debt -- Certain items which are not necessarily recorded as financial debt under French GAAP, such as capital leases, are recorded as financial debt under US GAAP. Financial debt is also increased under US GAAP with the consolidation of special purpose entities which are not consolidated under French GAAP.
Accounting for Goodwill -- Under US GAAP, goodwill with an indefinite life is no longer amortised but rather tested for impairment at least annually. The impairment test is based on fair value and subsequent reversal of a previously recognised impairment loss, if any, is prohibited. In addition to the matters described above that impact net income, liabilities and shareholders' equity, there are other differences in accounting principles between French GAAP and US GAAP that may materially affect the presentation of the balance sheet and income statement. We expect to file our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended 31 March 2003 with the SEC during June 2003. An electronic version of our Annual Report on Form 20-F will be available on our internet site at www.finance.alstom.com.
IMPACT OF EXCHANGE RATE AND INTEREST RATE FLUCTUATIONS Our policy is to use derivatives, such as forward foreign exchange contracts in order to hedge exchange rate fluctuations and, to a much lesser extent, interest rate fluctuations. Our policy does not permit any speculative market position. We have implemented a centralised treasury policy in order to better control the company's financial risks and to optimise cash management by pooling our available cash, thereby reducing the amount of external debt required and permitting us to obtain better terms under our various financing arrangements. The Corporate Treasurer reports directly to the CFO and has global responsibility for foreign exchange risk, interest rate management, intra-group financing and cash management. He managed a team of about 25 people in fiscal year 2003 located in Paris Headquarters. Corporate Treasury is organised in a Front-Office or Dealing Room, a Middle-Office and a Back-Office to ensure segregation of duties. In addition to this, a small team operates the netting of intercompany payments and prepares a weekly cash forecast. A network of Country Treasurers supports Corporate Treasury in the countries where we have a significant presence. Corporate Treasury acts as an in-house bank for subsidiaries by providing hedging and funding and maintaining internal current accounts. We have implemented cash pooling structures to centralise cash on a daily basis in the countries where local regulations permit it. Corporate Treasury uses the ReutersCashFlow Treasury Management System for straight-through processing of treasury transactions from dealing to settlement and management of in-house banking activity. Our Treasury Management System is interfaced with SAP for automatic generation of accounting entries. The Dealing Room is equipped with a Reuters Information System for real-time market data and uses a professional telephone dealing system provided by Etrali to tape all exchanges with bank's dealing rooms. A dedicated Information Technology team administers Treasury systems and guarantees back-up and contingency plans. The Middle Office monitors the Dealing Room activity, guarantees that no open positions are maintained, and produces regular risk reporting. Exchange rate risks In the course of our operations, we are exposed to currency risk arising from tenders for business remitted in foreign currency, and from awarded contracts or "firm commitments" under which revenues are denominated in foreign currency. The principal currencies to which we had significant exposure in fiscal year 2003 were US dollars, Pounds sterling and Swiss francs. We hedge risks related to firm commitments and tenders as follows: |X| by using forward contracts for firm commitments;
|X| by using foreign exchange derivative instruments, for tenders, usually pursuant to strategies involving combinations of purchased and written options; or |X| by entering into specific insurance policies, such as with Coface in France or Hermes in Germany. The purpose of these hedging activities is to protect us against any adverse currency movements which may affect contract revenues should the tender be successful, and to minimise the cost of having to unwind the strategy in the event of an unsuccessful tender. The decision whether to hedge tender volumes is based on the probability of the transaction being awarded to us, expected payment terms and our assessment of market conditions. Under our policy, only senior management may make such decisions. When a tender results in the award of a contract, we hedge the resulting net cash flows mainly in the forward markets or, in some exceptional cases, keep them covered under insurance policies. Due to the long-term nature of our business, the average duration of these forward contracts is approximately 12-14 months. We do not hedge our net assets invested in foreign operations. We monitor our market positions closely and regularly analyse market valuations. We also have in place counter-party risk management guidelines. All derivative transactions, including forward exchange contracts, are designed and executed by our central corporate treasury department, except in some specific countries where restrictive regulation prevent a centralised execution. Interest rate risks See Note 29(b) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of our interest rate risks and of sensitivity to interest rate variation.
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
PRESS INFORMATION 14 May 2003 FOR INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION ------------------------------ FULL-YEAR RESULTS 2002/03 1st April 2002 - 31st March 2003 Results in line with guidance given on 12 March 2003: o Orders received: 19.1bn, down 4% from fiscal year 2001/02 on a comparable basis o Sales: 21.4bn, up 1% from fiscal year 2001/02 on a comparable basis o Operating margin before exceptional items: 4.1% (2001/02: 4.0%) o Net income: (1.38)bn o Free cash flow: (265)m, after cash outflow of 1,055m for GT24/GT26 o Economic debt reduced to 4.9bn at 31 March 2003 from 5.3bn at 31 March 2002 Key achievements since presentation of Action Plan on 12 March 2003: o 50% of new 3.0bn target for disposals secured o New credit lines confirmed o Senior management renewed & new organisation implemented o Restructuring & overhead reduction plans launched Commenting on the results Patrick Kron, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, said: "The past twelve months have been difficult, with a weakening global economy, tightening financial markets and a sharp deterioration in the world-wide power generation market. These adverse conditions were reflected in a slowdown in orders, particularly during the final quarter of our financial year. The Group faces many challenges. Our profitability is unsatisfactory, our debt clearly remains too high, and we continue to pay the price of past problems which we are working to close out, in particular in relation to the GT24/GT26 gas turbines. Due to the severe downturn in some of our markets, we need to adapt our capacity and further reduce our costs. The action plan I outlined in March was a decisive response to these challenges and I am pleased to report that we have made good progress on the plan's key actions. We have secured fifty per cent of the proceeds targeted from our ALSTOM - 25 avenue Kléber - 75795 Paris Cedex 16 - TEL: 33 (0)1 47 55 25 87 - FAX: 33 (0)1 47 55 24 38
PRESS INFORMATION disposal programme, strengthened our financial base by ensuring our liquidity and launched a number of initiatives to improve our operational performance. We will continue to move with determination to deliver on our commitments, so that ALSTOM's future performance better reflects both its leading positions in power and transport and the sound fundamentals of these markets." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full-year results 2002/03: Summary of Operating and Financial Review
Summary of results
(a) We define Free Cash Flow to mean Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less Capital expenditures, net of proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment (excluding proceeds from the sale of real estate as part of our strategic plan) and Increase (decrease) in variation in existing receivables considered as source of funding of our operations. However, this measure is not a measurement of performance either under French or US GAAP. (b) We define Economic debt to mean Net debt (or Financial debt net of short term investments and cash and cash equivalents) plus cash proceeds from sale of trade receivables ("securitisation of existing receivables"). Economic debt does not represent our Financial debt as calculated under French GAAP, and should not be considered as an indicator of our currently outstanding indebtedness because trade receivables securitised are sold irrevocably and without recourse. (c) Adjusted for changes in business composition and exchange rates Trading impacted by difficult market conditions Despite an unfavourable economic climate, markets remained generally buoyant in rail transport and stable in both electricity transmission and power generation ALSTOM - 25 avenue Kléber - 75795 Paris Cedex 16 - TEL: 33 (0)1 47 55 25 87 - FAX: 33 (0)1 47 55 24 38
PRESS INFORMATION service. Conditions were unfavourable, however, in large gas- and steam-related plant and equipment activities in power generation, following the end of the `gas boom' in the US market, and remained difficult in electricity distribution. Our Marine market remained very weak. Overall, Group order intake was down 4% on a comparable basis against the prior year and sales were broadly stable (+1%). The order backlog amounted to over 30.3 billion at 31 March 2003, representing approximately 17 months of sales. Results affected by exceptional provisions Operating income was (434) million, after the impact of exceptional provisions of (1,300) million, primarily to cover additional costs relating to our GT24/GT26 gas turbines and, to a lesser extent, additional costs associated with our UK trains issues. Excluding these provisions, the Group's operating income was 866 million and the operating margin was 4.1% (4.0% in fiscal year 2001/02). Restructuring charges increased from (227) million in 2001/02 to (268) million in 2002/03. Pensions charges increased from (139) million to (214) million due to the increase in amortisation of the difference between benefits and market value of pension assets. Financial income improved from (294) million to (270) million. Due to the negative pre-tax result, a tax credit of 241 million was recorded in fiscal year 2002/03. Goodwill amortisation remained broadly stable at 284 million. Net income, after exceptional provisions, was (1,381) million for fiscal year 2002/03. Improvement in free cash flow Free cash flow improved to (265) million, from (1,151) million in fiscal year 2001/02, reflecting a substantial improvement in working capital. Excluding cash outflows relating to the GT24/GT26 gas turbines, free cash flow was 790 million positive. Economic debt reduced by 372 million Economic debt was 4,918 million at the end of March 2003, compared with 5,290 million at the end of March 2002, a reduction of 372 million. This primarily ALSTOM - 25 avenue Kléber - 75795 Paris Cedex 16 - TEL: 33 (0)1 47 55 25 87 - FAX: 33 (0)1 47 55 24 38
PRESS INFORMATION reflects the impact of the capital increase in July 2002 and the disposals, partly offset by the negative free cash flow. ALSTOM - 25 avenue Kléber - 75795 Paris Cedex 16 - TEL: 33 (0)1 47 55 25 87 - FAX: 33 (0)1 47 55 24 38
PRESS INFORMATION Sector Review Power In difficult conditions linked to the new equipment market downturn, particularly in the US, orders fell by 16% on a comparable basis, with a pronounced decline in the final quarter. Sales on a comparable basis declined by 10%, with growth in boilers, environmental services, hydro and customer service partially offsetting a sharp decrease in gas segment sales and a reducing backlog of large turnkey steam projects. Margins improved in the Boiler & Environment, Steam Power Plant and Industrial Turbine segments, although these were offset by the negative impact of the GT24/GT26 problems and the related exceptional provisions. As reported on 12 March, the difficulties with the GT24/GT26 gas turbines were reassessed and an additional gross provision of 1,160m was taken in fiscal year 2002/03. Good progress is now being made on the recovery package and of the 80 units sold, 71 are now in service. Excluding this GT24/GT26 provision, the operating margin of the Power Sector was 4.3%. Transmission & Distribution (T&D) The T&D market declined year-on-year, principally due to uncertainties over deregulation in the US. The Chinese and North African markets remained strong. Against this background, orders on a comparable basis increased by 4%, reflecting sound activity levels in transmission, contrasted with weak demand in distribution. Sales on a comparable basis grew by 1%. T&D's operating margin improved from 5.9% to 6.3%, reflecting better monitoring of overhead expenditure and the effects of cost-reduction programmes, partly offset by continuing price pressure in some market segments. Transport Transport took advantage of a generally buoyant market: orders were up 17% and sales up 27% in fiscal year 2002/03 versus the prior year, on a comparable basis. A gross provision of 140 million was taken in fiscal year 2002/03 to cover additional costs on the regional trains and West Coast Main Line (WCML) contracts. Excluding this exceptional provision, the margin in the Transport Sector was 3.7%, still adversely affected by low workload in UK, Canada and locomotives businesses. ALSTOM - 25 avenue Kléber - 75795 Paris Cedex 16 - TEL: 33 (0)1 47 55 25 87 - FAX: 33 (0)1 47 55 24 38
PRESS INFORMATION Marine Sales grew by 26%, reflecting the strong workload in fiscal year 2002/03 which will continue through fiscal year 2003/04. But due to the weak marine market, order intake was very low at 163 million, creating uncertainty as to the workload for fiscal year 2004/05 and beyond. ALSTOM - 25 avenue Kléber - 75795 Paris Cedex 16 - TEL: 33 (0)1 47 55 25 87 - FAX: 33 (0)1 47 55 24 38
PRESS INFORMATION Action Plan Update On 12 March 2003 ALSTOM's new Chairman & CEO, Patrick Kron, launched an Action Plan. The plan has three main objectives: 1. Focus the Group's activities through an extended disposal programme 2. Strengthen the financial base 3. Improve operational performance Several steps have already been achieved: 1. Disposal programme: 50% secured The targeted total proceeds from the extended disposals programme of 3 billion by March 2004, are already 50% secured following the sale of the Industrial Turbines businesses for 1,100 million (950 million of net cash proceeds) announced in April 2003 and a further 138 million received in April 2003 from real estate sales. Together with the 418 million of proceeds realised in fiscal year 2002/03, this brings proceeds secured to date to 1.5 billion. The remaining part of the programme is progressing: additional real estate sales should be finalised over the next few months and the sale of the Transmission & Distribution Sector is proceeding according to schedule. 2. Strengthen financial base: liquidity secured; capital increase planned Liquidity secured The Group's current liquidity requirements have been secured with the formal agreement of banks to amend covenants on existing facilities. A new bridge loan of 600 million and the extension of credit lines totalling 475 million have been obtained pending the disposals. Capital increase planned The non-consolidated losses in the Company's Statutory Accounts encompass an exceptional write-off reflecting current accounting values of its subsidiaries. Such losses will be applied to reduce the Company's share capital by a reduction of the nominal value of each existing share of the Company from 6 to 1.25. ALSTOM - 25 avenue Kléber - 75795 Paris Cedex 16 - TEL: 33 (0)1 47 55 25 87 - FAX: 33 (0)1 47 55 24 38
PRESS INFORMATION ALSTOM will seek to raise up to 600 million of additional funds at the appropriate time through a capital increase by way of a rights issue. Resolutions authorising the reduction of nominal value and the capital increase will be submitted for approval at the Company's Annual General Shareholders' Meeting on 2 July 2003. If shareholders do not approve the autorisation to increase the capital, the banks will be entitled to require repayment of the 600 million bridge loan and 475 million extended credit lines. 3. Operational performance: improvement underway Management & organisation: renewed ALSTOM's top management has been renewed: five new members joined the Executive Committee, with changed management in the Power and Transport Sectors. A more efficient organisation is being implemented: the Power Sector has been delayered and split into three Sectors: Power Turbo-Systems, Power Service and Power Environment. A Corporate Risk Committee chaired by the Chairman & CEO is now operational. Cost-reduction: programmes launched The restructuring and cost-reduction programmes have been launched. These programmes should lead to recurring annual savings of 500 million within two years. Industrial restructuring is being accelerated and the planned reduction of 3,000 employees out of the current 11,000 in the Power Turbo-Systems Sector has been announced. Overhead reduction programmes have also started with the announcement of a planned 40% reduction in employee numbers at Corporate and Power headquarters. Commercial activity: encouraging successes Activity at the end of the fiscal year was impacted by the downturn in some of our markets and uncertainties as to ALSTOM's future following the announcements of 12 March. Through strong marketing efforts, however, the Group has been able to maintain the support of its customer base and secure new, good-quality contracts in its various sectors over the past few weeks, including the 179 million 25-year maintenance contract ALSTOM - 25 avenue Kléber - 75795 Paris Cedex 16 - TEL: 33 (0)1 47 55 25 87 - FAX: 33 (0)1 47 55 24 38
PRESS INFORMATION with the Barcelona metro; a 315 million contract for the supply of Coradia trains in Italy; and a 320 million contract for the supply of a gas-fired combined-cycle power plant in Bahrain. Outlook Whilst we expect overall demand to be generally low over the next few months due to the depressed power generation market, we are confident that market fundamentals will lead, in the medium to long-term, to growing demand for both new equipment and service. The timing of recovery in the power generation equipment and cruise-ship markets is uncertain. The Transport market, however, should remain sound, even if activity may be slightly lower than last year's exceptionally high level. Given the progress in our operating margin before exceptional provisions in fiscal year 2002/03, coupled with the extensive restructuring plans now underway, we are confident of achieving our target of 6% operating margin by fiscal year 2005/06. In view of the current free cash flow, we foresee the Group to generating positive free cash flow, once the GT24/GT26 gas turbine problem is resolved. We also anticipate our economic debt will be reduced from 4.9 billion in March 2003 to a level in the range of 2.0 - 2.5 billion by March 2005, depending on the quantity of additional funds raised through the planned capital increase. * * * - ends - A full copy of the Operating and Financial review and prospects and a full set of accounts and notes is available on ALSTOM's website (www.alstom.com). Press enquiries: G. Tourvieille/M. Dowd (Tel. +33 1 47 55 23 15) internet.press@chq.alstom.com Investor relations: E. Châtelain (Tel. +33 1 47 55 25 33) investor.relations@chq.alstom.com ALSTOM - 25 avenue Kléber - 75795 Paris Cedex 16 - TEL: 33 (0)1 47 55 25 87 - FAX: 33 (0)1 47 55 24 38
PRESS INFORMATION Forward-Looking Statements: This press release contains, and other written or oral reports and communications of ALSTOM may from time to time contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Examples of such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to (i) projections or expectations of sales, orders received, income, operating margins, dividends, provisions, cash flow, debt or other financial items or ratios, (ii) statements of plans, objectives or goals of ALSTOM or its management, (iii) statements of future product or economic performance, and (iv) statements of assumptions underlying such statements. Words such as "believes", "anticipates", "expects", "intends", "aims", "plans" and "will" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements but are not exclusive means of identifying such statements. By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that the forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not be achieved. Such statements are based on management's current plans and expectations and are subject to a number of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the plans, objectives and expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements. These factors include: (i) the inherent difficulty of forecasting future market conditions, level of infrastructure spending, GDP growth generally, interest rates and exchange rates; (ii) the effects of, and changes in, laws, regulations, governmental policy, taxation or accounting standards or practices; (iii) the effects of currency exchange rate movements; (iv) the effects of competition in the product markets and geographic areas in which ALSTOM operates; (iv) the ability to increase market share, control costs and enhance cash generation while maintaining high quality products and services; (v) the timely development of new products and services; (vi) the impact of our high levels of indebtedness; (vii) the ability to renegotiate or renew our existing credit lines and to meet the financial and other covenants contained in these credit lines; (viii) difficulties in obtaining bid, performance and other bonds with customary amounts or terms; (ix) the timing of and ability to meet the cash generation and other initiatives of the new action plan, particularly, the ability to dispose of the Transmission and Distribution business and certain real estate assets on favourable terms or in a timely fashion; (x) the availability of external sources of financing on commercially reasonable terms; (xi) the inherent technical complexity of many of ALSTOM's products and technologies and the ability to resolve effectively and at reasonable cost technical problems that inevitably arise, including in particular the problems encountered with the GT24/26 gas turbines and the UK trains; (xii) risks inherent in large contracts and/or significant fixed price contracts that comprise a substantial portion of ALSTOM's business; (xiii) the inherent difficulty in estimating future charter or sale prices of any relevant cruise ship in any appraisal of the exposure in respect of the Renaissance Cruises matter; (xiv) the inherent difficulty in estimating ALSTOM's exposure to vendor financing and other credit risks which may notably be affected by customers' payment defaults; (xv) the ability to invest in successfully, and compete at the leading edge of, technology developments across all of ALSTOM's Sectors; (xvi) the availability of adequate cash flow from operations or other sources to achieve management's objectives or goals; ALSTOM - 25 avenue Kléber - 75795 Paris Cedex 16 - TEL: 33 (0)1 47 55 25 87 - FAX: 33 (0)1 47 55 24 38
PRESS INFORMATION (xvii) the effects of disposals and acquisitions generally; (xviii) the unusual level of uncertainty at this time regarding the world economy in general; and (xix) ALSTOM's success at adjusting to and managing the risks of the foregoing. The foregoing list is not exhaustive; when relying on forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect to ALSTOM, you should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and events, as well as other factors described in other documents ALSTOM files or submits from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), including reports submitted on Form 6-K. In particular, we expect our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended 31 March 2003 (including our audited financial statements for fiscal years ended 31 March 2003, 2002 and 2001) to be filed with the SEC in late May 2003. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and ALSTOM undertakes no obligation to update or revise any of them, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. This press release is not an offer to sell securities or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities, nor shall there be any offer or sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. ALSTOM - 25 avenue Kléber - 75795 Paris Cedex 16 - TEL: 33 (0)1 47 55 25 87 - FAX: 33 (0)1 47 55 24 38SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. ALSTOM Date: May 16, 2003 By: /s/ Philippe Jaffré -------------------------------- Name: Philippe Jaffré Title: Chief Financial Officer