UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549-1004
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-14064
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
11-2408943 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
767 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York |
|
10153 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
212-572-4200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
At October 21, 2010, 119,047,044 shares of the registrants Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value, and 76,732,041 shares of the registrants Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Sales |
|
$ |
2,091.7 |
|
$ |
1,833.4 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
488.1 |
|
445.1 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross Profit |
|
1,603.6 |
|
1,388.3 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
1,301.8 |
|
1,149.7 |
|
||
Restructuring and other special charges |
|
3.8 |
|
18.2 |
|
||
Total operating expenses |
|
1,305.6 |
|
1,167.9 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating Income |
|
298.0 |
|
220.4 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense, net |
|
16.1 |
|
19.6 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings before Income Taxes |
|
281.9 |
|
200.8 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for income taxes |
|
92.3 |
|
63.0 |
|
||
Net Earnings |
|
189.6 |
|
137.8 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
1.5 |
|
2.9 |
|
||
Net Earnings Attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
$ |
191.1 |
|
$ |
140.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
.97 |
|
$ |
.72 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.95 |
|
$ |
.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
196.7 |
|
196.7 |
|
||
Diluted |
|
200.4 |
|
198.2 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
|
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
||
|
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
693.5 |
|
$ |
1,120.7 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
1,155.4 |
|
746.2 |
|
||
Inventory and promotional merchandise, net |
|
905.2 |
|
826.6 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
444.3 |
|
427.5 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
3,198.4 |
|
3,121.0 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
1,043.8 |
|
1,023.6 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments, at cost or market value |
|
13.7 |
|
12.2 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
896.7 |
|
752.5 |
|
||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
245.0 |
|
109.5 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
239.9 |
|
316.8 |
|
||
Total other assets |
|
1,395.3 |
|
1,191.0 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,637.5 |
|
$ |
5,335.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current debt |
|
$ |
30.6 |
|
$ |
23.4 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
379.2 |
|
425.2 |
|
||
Accrued income taxes |
|
76.4 |
|
5.6 |
|
||
Other accrued liabilities |
|
1,200.7 |
|
1,118.0 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
1,686.9 |
|
1,572.2 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
1,204.5 |
|
1,205.0 |
|
||
Accrued income taxes |
|
163.5 |
|
163.3 |
|
||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
444.6 |
|
429.7 |
|
||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
|
1,812.6 |
|
1,798.0 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 650,000,000 shares Class A authorized; shares issued: 191,572,221 at September 30, 2010 and 190,767,435 at June 30, 2010; 240,000,000 shares Class B authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 76,732,041 at September 30, 2010 and 77,082,041 at June 30, 2010 |
|
2.7 |
|
2.7 |
|
||
Paid-in capital |
|
1,477.8 |
|
1,428.7 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
3,755.1 |
|
3,564.0 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(121.1 |
) |
(196.7 |
) |
||
|
|
5,114.5 |
|
4,798.7 |
|
||
Less: Treasury stock, at cost; 72,553,771 Class A shares at September 30, 2010 and 70,125,805 Class A shares at June 30, 2010 |
|
(2,993.5 |
) |
(2,850.3 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
2,121.0 |
|
1,948.4 |
|
||
Noncontrolling interests |
|
17.0 |
|
17.0 |
|
||
Total equity |
|
2,138.0 |
|
1,965.4 |
|
||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
5,637.5 |
|
$ |
5,335.6 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
189.6 |
|
$ |
137.8 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
68.8 |
|
65.3 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
6.1 |
|
(21.8 |
) |
||
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
30.6 |
|
19.2 |
|
||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
0.4 |
|
5.4 |
|
||
Non-cash charges associated with restructuring activities |
|
0.9 |
|
9.7 |
|
||
Pension and post-retirement benefit expense |
|
16.9 |
|
14.3 |
|
||
Pension and post-retirement benefit contributions |
|
(8.7 |
) |
(17.2 |
) |
||
Other non-cash items |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Increase in accounts receivable, net |
|
(369.2 |
) |
(218.7 |
) |
||
Increase in inventory and promotional merchandise, net |
|
(34.6 |
) |
(42.6 |
) |
||
Increase in other assets, net |
|
(12.9 |
) |
(24.5 |
) |
||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
(63.8 |
) |
6.1 |
|
||
Increase in accrued income taxes |
|
71.5 |
|
36.0 |
|
||
Increase in other liabilities |
|
65.8 |
|
33.3 |
|
||
Net cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities |
|
(39.1 |
) |
2.7 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Capital expenditures |
|
(57.7 |
) |
(45.4 |
) |
||
Acquisition of businesses and other intangible assets, net of cash acquired |
|
(258.5 |
) |
(9.3 |
) |
||
Net cash flows used for investing activities |
|
(316.2 |
) |
(54.7 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Increase (decrease) in short-term debt, net |
|
7.1 |
|
(6.3 |
) |
||
Repayments and redemptions of long-term debt |
|
(9.5 |
) |
(13.9 |
) |
||
Net settlement of interest rate derivatives |
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
||
Net proceeds from stock-based compensation transactions |
|
14.6 |
|
0.4 |
|
||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
||
Payments to acquire treasury stock |
|
(143.8 |
) |
(0.4 |
) |
||
Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
(0.1 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
||
Net cash flows used for financing activities |
|
(83.4 |
) |
(20.3 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
11.5 |
|
7.0 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
(427.2 |
) |
(65.3 |
) |
||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
1,120.7 |
|
864.5 |
|
||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
693.5 |
|
$ |
799.2 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). Net earnings attributable to the Company and net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests are disclosed separately on the face of the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings. In addition, noncontrolling interests are reported as a separate component of equity in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of equity. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010.
Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements of prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses reported in those financial statements. Certain significant accounting policies that contain subjective management estimates and assumptions include those related to revenue recognition, inventory, pension and other post-retirement benefit costs, goodwill, other intangible assets and long-lived assets, income taxes and derivatives. Descriptions of these policies are discussed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, and makes adjustments when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions. Significant changes, if any, in those estimates and assumptions resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements in future periods.
Currency Translation and Transactions
All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates are translated at period-end rates of exchange, while revenue and expenses are translated at weighted average rates of exchange for the period. Unrealized translation gains or losses, net of tax, are reported as cumulative translation adjustments through other comprehensive income (loss). Such adjustments amounted to $86.7 million and $33.6 million of unrealized translation gains, net of tax, during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the Companys subsidiary operating in a highly inflationary economy, the U.S. dollar is the functional currency. Remeasurement adjustments in financial statements in a highly inflationary economy and other transactional gains and losses are reflected in earnings.
The accompanying consolidated statements of earnings include net exchange gains on foreign currency transactions of $2.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and net exchange losses on foreign currency transactions of $0.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable is stated net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer deductions totaling $36.2 million and $34.3 million as of September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Companys largest customer sells products primarily within the United States and accounted for $282.0 million, or 13%, and $246.1 million, or 13%, of the Companys consolidated net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. This customer accounted for $182.0 million, or 16%, and $84.3 million, or 11%, of the Companys accounts receivable at September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively.
Inventory and Promotional Merchandise
|
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
||
|
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||
Inventory and promotional merchandise, net consists of: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
220.4 |
|
$ |
206.0 |
|
Work in process |
|
71.9 |
|
78.6 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
507.6 |
|
377.8 |
|
||
Promotional merchandise |
|
105.3 |
|
164.2 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
905.2 |
|
$ |
826.6 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
||
|
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||
Assets (Useful Life) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Land |
|
$ |
14.6 |
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
Buildings and improvements (10 to 40 years) |
|
180.5 |
|
172.5 |
|
||
Machinery and equipment (3 to 10 years) |
|
1,225.1 |
|
1,174.9 |
|
||
Furniture and fixtures (5 to 10 years) |
|
88.1 |
|
82.1 |
|
||
Leasehold improvements |
|
1,129.4 |
|
1,081.2 |
|
||
|
|
2,637.7 |
|
2,525.0 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
1,593.9 |
|
1,501.4 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
1,043.8 |
|
$ |
1,023.6 |
|
The cost of assets related to projects in progress of $150.6 million and $160.4 million as of September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively, is included in their respective asset categories in the table above. Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment was $65.4 million and $62.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Depreciation and amortization related to the Companys manufacturing process is included in cost of sales and all other depreciation and amortization is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Income Taxes
The effective rate for income taxes was 32.7% and 31.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in the effective income tax rate was primarily attributable to the geographical mix of earnings and in particular, the increase in earnings from the Companys travel retail business.
As of September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of interest and penalties, totaled $153.3 million and $157.3 million, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was $79.6 million. The total gross interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits during the three months ended September 30, 2010 in the accompanying consolidated statement of earnings was $0.8 million. The total gross accrued interest and penalties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 was $43.9 million and $43.6 million, respectively. On the basis of the information available as of September 30, 2010, it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits could decrease in a range of $55 million to $70 million within 12 months as a result of projected resolutions of global tax examinations and controversies and a potential lapse of the applicable statutes of limitations.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Companys claim entered pursuant to an administrative process of the tax treaty between the United States and Belgium (commonly referred to as the Competent Authority process) was settled. This settlement resolved U.S. foreign tax credit determinations relating to a formal agreement with the Appeals division of the IRS in connection with the examination of fiscal years 2002 through 2005. The Competent Authority settlement did not materially impact the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent to September 30, 2010, the Company formally concluded the IRS examination of fiscal years 2006 through 2008. The change to the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits will be recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. At this time, the Company estimates that it will recognize, in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, a related tax and interest benefit that ranges between $7 million and $11 million, net of tax.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative guidance that will require entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements of assets and liabilities. The Company adopted the new guidance in its fiscal 2010 third quarter, except for certain detailed Level 3 disclosures, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and interim periods within those years. Because this guidance is primarily related to disclosures, the adoption is not expected to have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to eliminate the exception to consolidate a qualifying special-purpose entity, change the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and require companies to more frequently re-assess whether they must consolidate variable interest entities. Under the new guidance, the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is identified qualitatively as the enterprise that has both (a) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance, and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. This guidance becomes effective for the Company at its fiscal 2011 year-end and interim reporting periods thereafter. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company acquired the Smashbox brand which included the addition of goodwill of approximately $139 million, amortizable intangible assets of approximately $77 million (with a weighted-average amortization period of 9 years) and non-amortizable intangible assets of approximately $61 million related to the Companys makeup business. The fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired is provisional pending receipt of the final valuation of those assets.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company assigns goodwill of a reporting unit to the product category in which that reporting unit predominantly operates at the time of its acquisition.
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill is as follows:
(In millions) |
|
Skin Care |
|
Makeup |
|
Fragrance |
|
Hair Care |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance as of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Goodwill |
|
$ |
67.9 |
|
$ |
265.1 |
|
$ |
54.8 |
|
$ |
400.6 |
|
$ |
788.4 |
|
Accumulated impairments |
|
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
(35.9 |
) |
|||||
|
|
47.0 |
|
265.1 |
|
54.8 |
|
385.6 |
|
752.5 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Goodwill acquired during the period |
|
|
|
140.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
140.9 |
|
|||||
Translation and other adjustments |
|
0.8 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
2.2 |
|
3.3 |
|
|||||
|
|
0.8 |
|
141.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
2.2 |
|
144.2 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance as of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Goodwill |
|
69.1 |
|
406.2 |
|
54.9 |
|
403.0 |
|
933.2 |
|
|||||
Accumulated impairments |
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
(36.5 |
) |
|||||
|
|
$ |
47.8 |
|
$ |
406.2 |
|
$ |
54.9 |
|
$ |
387.8 |
|
$ |
896.7 |
|
Other intangible assets consists of the following:
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Total Net |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Total Net |
|
||||||
Amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Customer lists and other |
|
$ |
282.3 |
|
$ |
154.4 |
|
$ |
127.9 |
|
$ |
205.0 |
|
$ |
151.0 |
|
$ |
54.0 |
|
License agreements |
|
43.0 |
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
$ |
325.3 |
|
$ |
197.4 |
|
127.9 |
|
$ |
248.0 |
|
$ |
194.0 |
|
54.0 |
|
||
Non-amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Trademarks and other |
|
|
|
|
|
117.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
||||||
Total intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
245.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109.5 |
|
The aggregate amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $3.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for the remainder of fiscal 2011 and each of fiscal years ending June 30, 2012 to 2015 is $12.6 million, $15.6 million, $15.6 million, $15.5 million and $15.5 million, respectively.
NOTE 3 ACQUISITION OF BUSINESS
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company acquired Smashbox Beauty Cosmetics. The purchase price was funded by cash provided by operations. The results of operations are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements commencing with the date it was acquired. Pro forma results of operations of the prior-year period have not been presented, as the impact on the Companys consolidated financial results would not have been material. The aggregate cost of this transaction, net of cash acquired, and continuing earn-out obligations related to the acquisition of the Bobbi Brown brand was approximately $258 million.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 4 CHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
In an effort to drive down costs and achieve synergies within the organization, in February 2009, the Company announced the implementation of a multi-faceted cost savings program (the Program) to position itself to achieve long-term profitable growth. The Company anticipates the Program will result in related restructuring and other special charges, inclusive of cumulative charges recorded to date and over the next few fiscal years, totaling between $350 million and $450 million before taxes.
The Program focuses on a redesign of the Companys organizational structure in order to integrate it in a more cohesive way and operate more globally across brands and functions. A principal aspect of the Program is the reduction of the workforce by approximately 2,000 employees. Specific actions taken during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 included:
· Resize and Reorganize the Organization The Company continued the realignment and optimization of its organization to better leverage scale, improve productivity and reduce complexity in each region and across various functions. This included reduction of the workforce which occurred through the consolidation of certain functions through a combination of normal attrition and job eliminations.
· Turnaround or Exit Unprofitable Operations To improve the profitability in certain of the Companys brands and regions, the Company has selectively exited certain channels of distribution, categories and markets, and has made changes to turnaround others. This included the exit from the global wholesale distribution of our Prescriptives brand and the reformulation of Ojon brand products. In connection with these activities, we recorded a reserve for anticipated product returns, wrote off inventory and incurred costs to reduce workforce and terminate contracts.
· Outsourcing In order to balance the growing need for information technology support with the Companys efforts to provide the most efficient and cost effective solutions, the Company continued the outsourcing of certain information technology processes. The Company incurred costs to transition services to an outsource provider.
Restructuring Charges
The following table presents restructuring charges related to the Program as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employee related costs |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
Asset write-offs |
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
|
||
Contract terminations |
|
0.3 |
|
0.6 |
|
||
Other exit costs |
|
0.6 |
|
0.5 |
|
||
Total restructuring charges |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table presents aggregate restructuring charges related to the Program:
(In millions) |
|
Employee- |
|
Asset |
|
Contract |
|
Other Exit |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
$ |
70.3 |
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
29.3 |
|
11.0 |
|
2.3 |
|
6.2 |
|
48.8 |
|
|||||
Three months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
0.7 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.6 |
|
1.7 |
|
|||||
Charges recorded through September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
90.9 |
|
$ |
15.3 |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
$ |
120.8 |
|
The total amount of restructuring charges expected to be incurred (including those recorded as set forth in the table above include approximately $112 million to $114 million for employee-related costs, approximately $18 million in asset write-offs and approximately $23 million of contract terminations and other exit costs.
The following table presents accrued restructuring charges and the related activity as of and for the three months ended September 30, 2010 under the Program:
(In millions) |
|
Employee- |
|
Asset |
|
Contract |
|
Other Exit |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
30.6 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
31.1 |
|
Charges |
|
0.7 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.6 |
|
1.7 |
|
|||||
Cash payments |
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
(0.7 |
) |
(10.5 |
) |
|||||
Non-cash write-offs |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|||||
Translation adjustments |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
22.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
22.6 |
|
Accrued restructuring charges at September 30, 2010 are expected to result in cash expenditures funded from cash provided by operations of approximately $18 million and $5 million in fiscal 2011 and 2012, respectively.
Charges Associated with Restructuring Activities
The following table presents total charges associated with restructuring activities related to the Program:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sales Returns (included in Net sales) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
0.8 |
|
5.6 |
|
||
Restructuring Charges |
|
1.7 |
|
14.7 |
|
||
Other Special Charges |
|
2.1 |
|
3.5 |
|
||
Total Charges Associated with Restructuring Activities |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
$ |
42.3 |
|
Other special charges in connection with the implementation of the Program relate to consulting, other professional services, and accelerated depreciation. The total amount of other special charges expected to be incurred to implement these initiatives, including those recorded through September 30, 2010 is approximately $41 million.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded a write-off of inventory associated with turnaround operations of $0.8 million. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded $18.5 million reflecting sales returns (less a related cost of sales of $3.9 million) and a write-off of inventory of $9.5 million associated with exiting unprofitable operations, primarily related to the exit from the global wholesale distribution of the Prescriptives brand. The total amounts expected to be incurred, including those recorded through September 30, 2010 is between $36 million and $39 million related to sales returns and approximately $15 million related to inventory write-offs.
NOTE 5 DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company addresses certain financial exposures through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company primarily enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce the effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates and interest rate derivatives to manage the effects of interest rate movements on the Companys aggregate liability portfolio. The Company also enters into foreign currency forward and may use option contracts, not designated as hedging instruments, to mitigate the change in fair value of specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. The Company does not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Costs associated with entering into these derivative financial instruments have not been material to the Companys consolidated financial results.
For each derivative contract entered into where the Company looks to obtain special hedge accounting treatment, the Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the hedging instruments effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed prospectively and retrospectively, and a description of the method of measuring ineffectiveness. This process includes linking all derivatives to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedges inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective, or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company will be required to discontinue hedge accounting with respect to that derivative prospectively.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The fair values of the Companys derivative financial instruments included in the consolidated balance sheets are presented as follows:
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
||||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
||||
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
$ |
17.1 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
Not applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
55.8 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
10.5 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
2.8 |
|
2.0 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
2.5 |
|
2.0 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total Derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
$ |
57.8 |
|
|
|
$ |
19.1 |
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
(1) See Note 6 Fair Value Measurements for further information about how the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities are determined.
The amounts of the gains and losses related to the Companys derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:
(In millions) |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Location of Gain or |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
(13.9 |
) |
$ |
(4.9 |
) |
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
||||
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
(13.9 |
) |
$ |
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
(1) The amount of gain (loss) recognized in earnings related to the amount excluded from effectiveness testing was $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. There was no gain (loss) recognized in earnings related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions) |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
(1) Changes in the fair values of the interest rate swap agreements are exactly offset by changes in the fair value of the underlying long-term debt.
The amounts of the gains and losses related to the Companys derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:
(In millions) |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
(4.2 |
) |
Foreign Currency Cash-Flow Hedges
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge anticipated transactions, as well as receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies, for periods consistent with the Companys identified exposures. The purpose of the hedging activities is to minimize the effect of foreign exchange rate movements on costs and on the cash flows that the Company receives from foreign subsidiaries. The majority of foreign currency forward contracts are denominated in currencies of major industrial countries. The Company may also enter into foreign currency option contracts to hedge anticipated transactions. The foreign currency forward contracts entered into to hedge anticipated transactions have been designated as foreign currency cash-flow hedges and have varying maturities through the end of June 2011. Hedge effectiveness of foreign currency forward contracts is based on a hypothetical derivative methodology and excludes the portion of fair value attributable to the spot-forward difference which is recorded in current-period earnings. Hedge effectiveness of foreign currency option contracts is based on a dollar offset methodology.
The ineffective portion of both foreign currency forward and option contracts is recorded in current-period earnings. For hedge contracts that are no longer deemed highly effective, hedge accounting is discontinued and gains and losses accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified to earnings when the underlying forecasted transaction occurs. If it is probable that the forecasted transaction will no longer occur, then any gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified to current-period earnings. As of September 30, 2010, the Companys foreign currency cash-flow hedges were highly effective in all material respects. The estimated net gain (loss) as of September 30, 2010 that is expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings, net of tax, within the next twelve months is $2.5 million.
At September 30, 2010, the Company had foreign currency forward contracts in the amount of $1,338.9 million. The foreign currencies included in foreign currency forward contracts (notional value stated in U.S. dollars) are principally the Swiss franc ($252.3 million), British pound ($243.4 million), Euro ($142.0 million), Canadian dollar ($136.3 million), Hong Kong dollar ($104.0 million), Japanese yen ($88.7 million), and Australian dollar ($87.5 million).
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fair Value Hedges
The Company may enter into interest rate derivative contracts to manage the exposure to interest rate fluctuations on our funded indebtedness and anticipated issuance of debt for periods consistent with the identified exposures. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company terminated its interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount totaling $250.0 million which had effectively converted the fixed rate interest on its outstanding 2017 Senior Notes to variable interest rates. The instrument, which was classified as an asset, had a fair value of $47.4 million at the date of cash settlement. The net settlement is classified as a financing activity on the consolidated statements of cash flows. Hedge accounting treatment was discontinued prospectively and the fair value adjustment to the carrying amount of the related debt will be amortized against interest expense over the remaining life of the debt.
Credit Risk
As a matter of policy, the Company only enters into derivative contracts with counterparties that have at least an A (or equivalent) credit rating. The counterparties to these contracts are major financial institutions. Exposure to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by any of the counterparties is limited to the gross fair value of contracts in asset positions, which totaled $12.1 million at September 30, 2010. To manage this risk, the Company has established counterparty credit guidelines that are continually monitored and reported to management. Accordingly, management believes risk of loss under these hedging contracts is remote.
Certain of the Companys derivative financial instruments contain credit-risk-related contingent features. As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with such features.
NOTE 6 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company records its financial assets and liabilities at fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The accounting for fair value measurements must be applied to nonrecurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, which principally consist of assets or liabilities acquired through business combinations, goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets for purposes of calculating potential impairment, and liabilities associated with restructuring activities. The Company is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1: Inputs based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Inputs reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the instruments valuation.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table presents the Companys hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010:
(In millions) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Total |
|
||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
18.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
19.1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
19.1 |
|
The following table presents the Companys hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010:
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
19.1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
19.1 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
||||
Available-for-sale securities |
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
$ |
57.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
63.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the Companys other classes of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and cash equivalents - The carrying amount approximates fair value, primarily because of the short maturity of cash equivalent instruments.
Available-for-sale securities - Available-for-sale securities are generally comprised of mutual funds and are valued using quoted market prices on an active exchange. Available-for-sale securities are included in investments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Foreign currency forward contracts The fair values of the Companys foreign currency forward contracts were determined using an industry-standard valuation model, which is based on an income approach. The significant observable inputs to the model, such as swap yield curves and currency spot and forward rates, were obtained from an independent pricing service. To determine the fair value of contracts under the model, the difference between the contract price and the current forward rate was discounted using LIBOR for contracts with maturities up to 12 months, and swap yield curves for contracts with maturities greater than 12 months.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Interest rate swap contracts The fair values of the Companys outstanding interest rate swap contracts were determined using the market approach and were based on non-binding offers from the counterparties that are corroborated by observable market data using the income approach. The non-binding offers represented the prices offered by the counterparties in the over-the-counter market to unwind and terminate these instruments (exclusive of accrued interest) and incorporated the counterparties respective overall credit exposure to the Company. The Company performs a discounted cash flow analysis to corroborate the fair values of the non-binding offers using inputs such as swap yield curves and six-month LIBOR forward rates, which are obtained from an independent pricing service. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company terminated its interest rate swap agreements. See Note 5 Derivative Financial Instruments.
Short-term and long-term debt - The fair value of the Companys debt was estimated based on the current rates offered to the Company for debt with the same remaining maturities. To a lesser extent, debt also includes capital lease obligations for which the carrying amount approximates the fair value.
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
||||
Nonderivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
693.5 |
|
$ |
693.5 |
|
$ |
1,120.7 |
|
$ |
1,120.7 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
5.9 |
|
5.9 |
|
5.4 |
|
5.4 |
|
||||
Current and long-term debt |
|
1,235.1 |
|
1,356.6 |
|
1,228.4 |
|
1,325.3 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency forward contracts asset (liability) |
|
(7.0 |
) |
(7.0 |
) |
6.6 |
|
6.6 |
|
||||
Interest rate swap contracts asset |
|
|
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
38.7 |
|
||||
NOTE 7 PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Company maintains pension plans covering substantially all of its full-time employees for its U.S. operations and a majority of its international operations. The Company also maintains post-retirement benefit plans which provide certain medical and dental benefits to eligible employees. Descriptions of these plans are discussed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other than |
|
||||||||
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
Pension Plans |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
U.S. |
|
International |
|
Post-retirement |
|
||||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
Interest cost |
|
7.0 |
|
7.3 |
|
4.7 |
|
4.9 |
|
1.9 |
|
2.0 |
|
||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(8.7 |
) |
(8.0 |
) |
(5.3 |
) |
(5.0 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Prior service cost |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Actuarial loss |
|
2.4 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.1 |
|
||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company made contributions to its international pension plans totaling approximately $5 million.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 8 CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved, from time to time, in litigation and other legal proceedings incidental to its business. Management believes that the outcome of current litigation and legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon the Companys results of operations or financial condition. However, managements assessment of the Companys current litigation and other legal proceedings could change in light of the discovery of facts with respect to legal actions or other proceedings pending against the Company not presently known to the Company or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of fact which are not in accord with managements evaluation of the possible liability or outcome of such litigation or proceedings.
NOTE 9 COMMON STOCK
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, 350,000 shares of the Companys Class B Common Stock were converted into shares of Class A Common Stock.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company purchased approximately 2.4 million shares of its Class A Common Stock for $143.8 million.
NOTE 10 STOCK PROGRAMS
As of September 30, 2010, the Company has two active equity compensation plans which include the Amended and Restated Fiscal 2002 Share Incentive Plan (the Fiscal 2002 Plan) and the Non-Employee Director Share Incentive Plan (collectively, the Plans). These Plans currently provide for the issuance of 24,775,200 shares of Class A Common Stock, which consist of shares originally provided for and shares transferred to the Fiscal 2002 Plan from other inactive plans and employment agreements, to be granted in the form of stock-based awards to key employees, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company. As of September 30, 2010, approximately 4,316,100 shares of Class A Common Stock were reserved and available to be granted pursuant to these Plans. The Company may satisfy the obligation of its stock-based compensation awards with either new or treasury shares. The Companys equity compensation awards outstanding at September 30, 2010 include stock options, performance share units (PSU), restricted stock units (RSU) and share units.
Total net stock-based compensation expense is attributable to the granting of, and the remaining requisite service periods of, stock options, PSUs, RSUs and share units. Compensation expense attributable to net stock-based compensation during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $30.6 million and $19.2 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based awards was $111.5 million and the related weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized is approximately 2.2 years.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Stock Options
A summary of the Companys stock option programs as of September 30, 2010 and changes during the three months then ended, is presented below:
(Shares in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Weighted- |
|
Aggregate |
|
Weighted- |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
|
10,083.6 |
|
$ |
39.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted at fair value |
|
2,465.1 |
|
58.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercised |
|
(378.1 |
) |
38.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expired |
|
(13.1 |
) |
41.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Forfeited |
|
(19.6 |
) |
40.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
|
12,137.9 |
|
43.58 |
|
$ |
238.6 |
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercisable at September 30, 2010 |
|
6,057.8 |
|
39.26 |
|
$ |
145.2 |
|
4.5 |
|
|
(1) The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
The exercise period for all stock options generally may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. Stock option grants to individuals generally become exercisable in three substantively equal tranches over a service period of up to four years. The Company attributes the value of option awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in substance, multiple awards.
The per-share weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $18.81 and $10.53, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $7.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Weighted-average expected stock-price volatility |
|
31 |
% |
30 |
% |
Weighted-average expected option life |
|
8 years |
|
8 years |
|
Average risk-free interest rate |
|
2.2 |
% |
3.1 |
% |
Average dividend yield |
|
1.1 |
% |
2.0 |
% |
The Company uses a weighted-average expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both current and historical implied volatilities of the underlying stock which are obtained from public data sources. For the weighted-average expected option life assumption, the Company considers the exercise behavior of past grants and models the pattern of aggregate exercises. The average risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury strip rate for the expected term of the options and the average dividend yield is based on historical experience.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Performance Share Units
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted 184,600 PSUs, which will be settled in stock subject to the achievement of the Companys net sales, diluted net earnings per common share and return on invested capital goals for the three fiscal years ending June 30, 2013. Settlement will be made pursuant to a range of opportunities relative to the net sales, diluted net earnings per common share and return on invested capital targets of the Company and, as such, the compensation cost of the PSU is subject to adjustment based upon the attainability of these target goals. No settlement will occur for results below the applicable minimum threshold for a target and additional shares shall be issued if performance exceeds the targeted performance goals. Certain PSUs are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that will be payable in cash upon settlement of the PSU. Other PSUs granted in fiscal 2011 are not accompanied by dividend equivalent rights and, as such, were valued at the closing market value of the Companys Class A Common Stock on the date of grant less the discounted present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the shares during the vesting period. These awards are subject to the provisions of the agreement under which the PSUs are granted. The PSUs were valued at the closing market value of the Companys Class A Common Stock on the date of grant and generally vest at the end of the performance period. In September 2010, 47,500 shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock were issued and related accrued dividends were paid, relative to the target goals set at the time of issuance, in settlement of 93,200 PSUs which vested as of June 30, 2010.
The following is a summary of the status of the Companys PSUs as of September 30, 2010 and activity during the three months then ended:
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
(Shares in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value Per |
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2010 |
|
296.3 |
|
$ |
42.00 |
|
Granted |
|
184.6 |
|
58.61 |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2010 |
|
480.9 |
|
48.38 |
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
The Company granted approximately 924,100 RSUs during the three months ended September 30, 2010 which, at the time of grant, were scheduled to vest as follows: 496,900 on October 31, 2011, 284,100 on October 31, 2012 and 143,100 on October 31, 2013, all subject to the continued employment or retirement of the grantees. Certain RSUs granted in fiscal 2011 are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that will be payable in cash upon settlement of the RSU and, as such, were valued at the closing market value of the Companys Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. Other RSUs granted in fiscal 2011 are not accompanied by dividend equivalent rights and, as such, were valued at the closing market value of the Companys Class A Common Stock on the date of grant less the discounted present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the shares during the vesting period.
The following is a summary of the status of the Companys RSUs as of September 30, 2010 and activity during the three months then ended:
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
(Shares in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value Per |
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2010 |
|
1,300.9 |
|
$ |
37.79 |
|
Granted |
|
924.1 |
|
57.32 |
|
|
Vested |
|
(39.8 |
) |
33.50 |
|
|
Forfeited |
|
(11.6 |
) |
36.92 |
|
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2010 |
|
2,173.6 |
|
46.18 |
|
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Share Units
The Company grants share units to certain non-employee directors under the Non-Employee Director Share Incentive Plan. The share units are convertible into shares of Class A Common Stock as provided for in that plan. Share units are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that are converted to additional share units when such dividends are declared.
The following is a summary of the status of the Companys share units as of September 30, 2010 and activity during the three months then ended:
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
(Shares in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value Per |
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
|
26.4 |
|
$ |
39.27 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Converted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
|
26.4 |
|
39.27 |
|
|
Cash Units
Certain non-employee directors defer cash compensation in the form of cash payout share units, which are not subject to the Plans. These share units are classified as liabilities and, as such, their fair value is adjusted to reflect the current market value of the Companys Class A Common Stock. The Company recorded $0.7 million and $0.4 million as compensation expense to reflect additional deferrals and the change in the market value for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
NOTE 11 NET EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC. PER COMMON SHARE
Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. per common share (basic EPS) is computed by dividing net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and contingently issuable shares (which satisfy certain conditions). Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. per common share assuming dilution (diluted EPS) is computed by reflecting potential dilution from stock-based awards.
A reconciliation between the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
||||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
$ |
191.1 |
|
$ |
140.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Basic |
|
196.7 |
|
196.7 |
|
||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
|
2.8 |
|
0.7 |
|
||
Effect of restricted stock units |
|
0.9 |
|
0.8 |
|
||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Diluted |
|
200.4 |
|
198.2 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
.97 |
|
$ |
.72 |
|
Diluted |
|
.95 |
|
.71 |
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of September 30, 2010 and 2009, outstanding options to purchase 2.5 million and 11.7 million shares, respectively, of Class A Common Stock were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. As of September 30, 2010 and 2009, 0.5 million and 0.4 million of PSUs, respectively, have been excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS because the number of shares ultimately issued is contingent on the achievement of certain performance targets of the Company, as discussed in Note 10.
NOTE 12 COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consist of net unrealized investment gain (loss), net gain (loss) on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash-flow hedging instruments, net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service (costs) credits associated with pension and other post-retirement benefits, and cumulative translation adjustments as of the end of each period.
Comprehensive income (loss) and its components, net of tax, are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
189.6 |
|
$ |
137.8 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net unrealized investment gain (loss) |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
||
Net derivative instruments gain (loss) |
|
(8.8 |
) |
(1.7 |
) |
||
Amounts included in net periodic benefit cost, net |
|
(2.3 |
) |
1.5 |
|
||
Translation adjustments |
|
88.2 |
|
34.5 |
|
||
|
|
77.1 |
|
34.5 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
266.7 |
|
172.3 |
|
||
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net (earnings) loss |
|
1.5 |
|
2.9 |
|
||
Translation adjustments |
|
(1.5 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
$ |
266.7 |
|
$ |
174.3 |
|
NOTE 13 CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Common |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
AOCI |
|
Treasury |
|
Total |
|
controlling |
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
$ |
1,428.7 |
|
$ |
3,564.0 |
|
$ |
(196.7 |
) |
$ |
(2,850.3 |
) |
$ |
1,948.4 |
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
$ |
1,965.4 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
191.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
191.1 |
|
(1.5 |
) |
189.6 |
|
||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
75.6 |
|
1.5 |
|
77.1 |
|
||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141.5 |
) |
(141.5 |
) |
|
|
(141.5 |
) |
||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
47.4 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
||||||||
Balance September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
$ |
1,477.8 |
|
$ |
3,755.1 |
|
$ |
(121.1 |
) |
$ |
(2,993.5 |
) |
$ |
2,121.0 |
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
$ |
2,138.0 |
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 14 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Supplemental cash flow information for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||
Cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
$ |
42.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term debt issued upon acquisition of business |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
Liabilities incurred for acquisitions |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
Incremental tax benefit from the exercise of stock options |
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
$ |
|
|
Capital lease obligations incurred |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
Interest rate swap derivative mark to market |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
NOTE 15 SEGMENT DATA AND RELATED INFORMATION
Reportable operating segments include components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (the Chief Executive) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Although the Company operates in one business segment, beauty products, management also evaluates performance on a product category basis. Product category performance is measured based upon net sales before returns associated with restructuring activities, and earnings before income taxes, net interest expense and total charges associated with restructuring activities. Returns and charges associated with restructuring activities are not allocated to the product categories because they result from activities that are deemed a company-wide program to redesign the Companys organizational structure.
The accounting policies for the Companys reportable segments are substantially the same as those for the consolidated financial statements, as described in the segment data and related information footnote included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010. The assets and liabilities of the Company are managed centrally and are reported internally in the same manner as the consolidated financial statements; thus, no additional information is produced for the Chief Executive or included herein. There has been no significant variance in the total or long-lived asset values associated with the Companys segment data since June 30, 2010.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||
PRODUCT CATEGORY DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Skin Care |
|
$ |
857.7 |
|
$ |
730.3 |
|
Makeup |
|
794.2 |
|
717.9 |
|
||
Fragrance |
|
334.5 |
|
291.5 |
|
||
Hair Care |
|
94.4 |
|
97.9 |
|
||
Other |
|
10.9 |
|
14.3 |
|
||
|
|
2,091.7 |
|
1,851.9 |
|
||
Returns associated with restructuring activities |
|
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
2,091.7 |
|
$ |
1,833.4 |
|
Operating Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Skin Care |
|
$ |
149.9 |
|
$ |
114.3 |
|
Makeup |
|
103.2 |
|
107.8 |
|
||
Fragrance |
|
50.3 |
|
28.2 |
|
||
Hair Care |
|
1.8 |
|
9.6 |
|
||
Other |
|
(2.6 |
) |
2.8 |
|
||
|
|
302.6 |
|
262.7 |
|
||
Total charges associated with restructuring activities |
|
(4.6 |
) |
(42.3 |
) |
||
|
|
298.0 |
|
220.4 |
|
||
Reconciliation: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense, net |
|
16.1 |
|
19.6 |
|
||
Earnings before income taxes |
|
$ |
281.9 |
|
$ |
200.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GEOGRAPHIC DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
The Americas |
|
$ |
997.2 |
|
$ |
892.3 |
|
Europe, the Middle East & Africa |
|
680.9 |
|
601.9 |
|
||
Asia/Pacific |
|
413.6 |
|
357.7 |
|
||
|
|
2,091.7 |
|
1,851.9 |
|
||
Returns associated with restructuring activities |
|
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
2,091.7 |
|
$ |
1,833.4 |
|
Operating Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
The Americas |
|
$ |
103.1 |
|
$ |
113.9 |
|
Europe, the Middle East & Africa |
|
138.6 |
|
93.3 |
|
||
Asia/Pacific |
|
60.9 |
|
55.5 |
|
||
|
|
302.6 |
|
262.7 |
|
||
Total charges associated with restructuring activities |
|
(4.6 |
) |
(42.3 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
298.0 |
|
$ |
220.4 |
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We manufacture, market and sell beauty products including those in the skin care, makeup, fragrance and hair care categories which are distributed in over 150 countries and territories. The following is a comparative summary of operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and reflects the basis of presentation described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for all periods presented. Sales of products and services that do not meet our definition of skin care, makeup, fragrance or hair care have been included in the other category.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(In millions) |
|
||||
NET SALES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
By Region: |
|