UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549-1004
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)-
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018
OR
¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-14064
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
11-2408943 |
|
|
|
767 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York |
|
10153 |
212-572-4200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, and emerging growth company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
|
Emerging growth company o |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
At April 25, 2018, 223,987,233 shares of the registrants Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value, and 143,051,679 shares of the registrants Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Sales |
|
$ |
3,370 |
|
$ |
2,857 |
|
$ |
10,388 |
|
$ |
8,930 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
683 |
|
591 |
|
2,147 |
|
1,824 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gross Profit |
|
2,687 |
|
2,266 |
|
8,241 |
|
7,106 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
2,093 |
|
1,780 |
|
6,268 |
|
5,522 |
| ||||
Restructuring and other charges |
|
97 |
|
59 |
|
198 |
|
122 |
| ||||
Total operating expenses |
|
2,190 |
|
1,839 |
|
6,466 |
|
5,644 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Income |
|
497 |
|
427 |
|
1,775 |
|
1,462 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
33 |
|
28 |
|
96 |
|
71 |
| ||||
Interest income and investment income, net |
|
16 |
|
8 |
|
40 |
|
19 |
| ||||
Earnings before Income Taxes |
|
480 |
|
407 |
|
1,719 |
|
1,410 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
106 |
|
107 |
|
790 |
|
384 |
| ||||
Net Earnings |
|
374 |
|
300 |
|
929 |
|
1,026 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(6 |
) | ||||
Net Earnings Attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
$ |
372 |
|
$ |
298 |
|
$ |
922 |
|
$ |
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
$ |
.81 |
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
$ |
2.78 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.99 |
|
$ |
.80 |
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
$ |
2.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
367.9 |
|
367.0 |
|
368.3 |
|
366.8 |
| ||||
Diluted |
|
375.7 |
|
372.3 |
|
375.7 |
|
372.7 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
.38 |
|
$ |
.34 |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
.98 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
374 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
$ |
929 |
|
$ |
1,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net unrealized investment gain (loss) |
|
(6 |
) |
2 |
|
(13 |
) |
(9 |
) | ||||
Net derivative instrument loss |
|
(14 |
) |
(51 |
) |
(19 |
) |
(17 |
) | ||||
Amounts included in net periodic benefit cost |
|
5 |
|
7 |
|
15 |
|
23 |
| ||||
Translation adjustments |
|
72 |
|
64 |
|
154 |
|
(49 |
) | ||||
Provision for deferred income taxes on components of other comprehensive income |
|
(4 |
) |
17 |
|
(6 |
) |
(2 |
) | ||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
53 |
|
39 |
|
131 |
|
(54 |
) | ||||
Comprehensive income |
|
427 |
|
339 |
|
1,060 |
|
972 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net earnings |
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(6 |
) | ||||
Translation adjustments |
|
|
|
1 |
|
(1 |
) |
|
| ||||
|
|
(2 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(6 |
) | ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
$ |
425 |
|
$ |
338 |
|
$ |
1,052 |
|
$ |
966 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
|
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
| ||
(In millions, except share data) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,140 |
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
384 |
|
605 |
| ||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
1,761 |
|
1,395 |
| ||
Inventory and promotional merchandise, net |
|
1,533 |
|
1,479 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
351 |
|
349 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
6,169 |
|
4,964 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
1,726 |
|
1,671 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term investments |
|
1,027 |
|
1,026 |
| ||
Goodwill |
|
1,931 |
|
1,916 |
| ||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
1,293 |
|
1,327 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
626 |
|
664 |
| ||
Total other assets |
|
4,877 |
|
4,933 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,772 |
|
$ |
11,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current debt |
|
$ |
296 |
|
$ |
189 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
884 |
|
835 |
| ||
Other accrued liabilities |
|
2,208 |
|
1,799 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
3,388 |
|
2,823 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
3,363 |
|
3,383 |
| ||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
1,284 |
|
960 |
| ||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
|
4,647 |
|
4,343 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, $.01 par value; Class A shares authorized: 1,300,000,000 at March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017; shares issued: 435,079,225 at March 31, 2018 and 429,968,260 at June 30, 2017; Class B shares authorized: 304,000,000 at March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017; shares issued and outstanding: 143,051,679 at March 31, 2018 and 143,762,288 at June 30, 2017 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
| ||
Paid-in capital |
|
3,911 |
|
3,559 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
8,996 |
|
8,452 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(386 |
) |
(484 |
) | ||
|
|
12,527 |
|
11,533 |
| ||
Less: Treasury stock, at cost; 210,829,802 Class A shares at March 31, 2018 and 205,627,082 Class A shares at June 30, 2017 |
|
(7,816 |
) |
(7,149 |
) | ||
Total stockholders equity The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
4,711 |
|
4,384 |
| ||
Noncontrolling interests |
|
26 |
|
18 |
| ||
Total equity |
|
4,737 |
|
4,402 |
| ||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
12,772 |
|
$ |
11,568 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
(In millions) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
929 |
|
$ |
1,026 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
389 |
|
337 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
84 |
|
(84 |
) | ||
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
196 |
|
175 |
| ||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
|
(37 |
) | ||
Net loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
12 |
|
(4 |
) | ||
Non-cash restructuring and other charges |
|
1 |
|
3 |
| ||
Pension and post-retirement benefit expense |
|
54 |
|
59 |
| ||
Pension and post-retirement benefit contributions |
|
(65 |
) |
(19 |
) | ||
Changes in fair value of contingent consideration |
|
(6 |
) |
1 |
| ||
Other non-cash items |
|
(13 |
) |
(17 |
) | ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Increase in accounts receivable, net |
|
(325 |
) |
(242 |
) | ||
Decrease in inventory and promotional merchandise, net |
|
|
|
59 |
| ||
Decrease (increase) in other assets, net |
|
1 |
|
(30 |
) | ||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
20 |
|
(168 |
) | ||
Increase in other accrued and noncurrent liabilities |
|
654 |
|
193 |
| ||
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
1,931 |
|
1,252 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital expenditures |
|
(368 |
) |
(316 |
) | ||
Payments for acquired businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
(11 |
) |
(1,690 |
) | ||
Proceeds from the disposition of investments |
|
716 |
|
955 |
| ||
Purchases of investments |
|
(492 |
) |
(1,067 |
) | ||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
12 |
| ||
Net cash flows used for investing activities |
|
(155 |
) |
(2,106 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds of current debt, net |
|
106 |
|
194 |
| ||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net |
|
|
|
1,498 |
| ||
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
(10 |
) | ||
Repayments and redemptions of long-term debt |
|
(1 |
) |
(4 |
) | ||
Net proceeds from stock-based compensation transactions |
|
157 |
|
94 |
| ||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
|
37 |
| ||
Payments to acquire treasury stock |
|
(676 |
) |
(363 |
) | ||
Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
(407 |
) |
(361 |
) | ||
Payments to noncontrolling interest holders for dividends |
|
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) | ||
Net cash flows provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
(822 |
) |
1,083 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
50 |
|
(4 |
) | ||
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
1,004 |
|
225 |
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
1,136 |
|
914 |
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
2,140 |
|
$ |
1,139 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year. The interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses reported in those financial statements. Certain significant accounting policies that contain subjective management estimates and assumptions include those related to revenue recognition, inventory, pension and other post-retirement benefit costs, goodwill, other intangible assets and long-lived assets, and income taxes. Descriptions of these policies are discussed in the notes to consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. See Income Taxes for additional discussion regarding tax legislation enacted by the U.S. government in December 2017, the impact of which may affect the estimates and assumptions used to determine the expected future tax consequences of events recognized in the Companys consolidated financial statements. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, and makes adjustments when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions. Significant changes, if any, in those estimates and assumptions resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements in future periods.
Currency Translation and Transactions
All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates are translated at period-end rates of exchange, while revenue and expenses are translated at weighted-average rates of exchange for the period. Unrealized translation gains (losses), net of tax, reported as cumulative translation adjustments through other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. were $65 million and $67 million, net of tax, during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $149 million and $(53) million, net of tax, during the nine months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts and may enter into option contracts to hedge foreign currency transactions for periods consistent with its identified exposures. Accordingly, the Company categorizes these instruments as entered into for purposes other than trading.
The accompanying consolidated statements of earnings include net exchange gains (losses) on foreign currency transactions of $(26) million and $8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $(61) million and $14 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable is stated net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer deductions totaling $38 million and $30 million as of March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017, respectively.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company is a worldwide manufacturer, marketer and distributor of skin care, makeup, fragrance and hair care products. The Companys sales subject to credit risk are made primarily to department stores, perfumeries, specialty multi-brand retailers and retailers in its travel retail business. The Company grants credit to qualified customers and does not believe it is exposed significantly to any undue concentration of credit risk. The Company does not have any customers that represent 10% or greater of its consolidated net sales in each period presented. The Companys largest customer sells products primarily in the United States and accounted for $188 million, or 11%, of the Companys accounts receivable at March 31, 2018. This customer represented less than 10% of the Companys accounts receivable at June 30, 2017.
Inventory and Promotional Merchandise
Inventory and promotional merchandise, net consists of:
|
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
| ||
(In millions) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
360 |
|
$ |
334 |
|
Work in process |
|
172 |
|
194 |
| ||
Finished goods |
|
849 |
|
762 |
| ||
Promotional merchandise |
|
152 |
|
189 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
$ |
1,479 |
|
During the first quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company adopted new accounting guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) that simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory by requiring inventory to be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value instead of lower of cost or market value. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Companys measurement of inventory and promotional merchandise.
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
| ||
(In millions) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||
Assets (Useful Life) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Land |
|
$ |
30 |
|
$ |
30 |
|
Buildings and improvements (10 to 40 years) |
|
202 |
|
192 |
| ||
Machinery and equipment (3 to 10 years) |
|
702 |
|
668 |
| ||
Computer hardware and software (4 to 15 years) |
|
1,160 |
|
1,115 |
| ||
Furniture and fixtures (5 to 10 years) |
|
105 |
|
96 |
| ||
Leasehold improvements |
|
2,153 |
|
1,918 |
| ||
|
|
4,352 |
|
4,019 |
| ||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
(2,626 |
) |
(2,348 |
) | ||
|
|
$ |
1,726 |
|
$ |
1,671 |
|
The cost of assets related to projects in progress of $206 million and $183 million as of March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017, respectively, is included in their respective asset categories above. Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment was $116 million and $106 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $342 million and $316 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Depreciation and amortization related to the Companys manufacturing process is included in Cost of Sales, and all other depreciation and amortization is included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Income Taxes
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the TCJA). The TCJA includes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code that impacted the Companys accounting and reporting for income taxes in the current-year period. These impacts primarily consist of the following:
· A reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018, which will result in a fiscal 2018 U.S. blended statutory income tax rate for the Company of 28%.
· A one-time transitional repatriation tax on unremitted foreign earnings (Transition Tax), which may be paid over an eight-year period.
· The remeasurement of U.S. net deferred tax assets as of the enactment date.
On December 22, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118) to provide guidance that companies should apply each reporting period related to the income tax effects of the TCJA. SAB 118 provides that companies (i) should record the effects of the changes from the TCJA for which the accounting is complete (not provisional), (ii) should record provisional amounts for the effects of the changes from the TCJA for which the accounting is not complete, and for which reasonable estimates can be determined, in the period they are identified, and (iii) should not record provisional amounts if reasonable estimates cannot be made for the effects of the changes from the TCJA, and should continue to apply guidance based on the tax law in effect prior to the enactment on December 22, 2017. In addition, SAB 118 establishes a one-year measurement period (through December 22, 2018) where a provisional amount could be subject to adjustment, and requires certain qualitative and quantitative disclosures related to provisional amounts and accounting during the measurement period.
During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company changed its indefinite reinvestment assertion with respect to certain of its foreign earnings resulting in an adjustment to the provisional Transition Tax charge recorded in the fiscal 2018 second quarter. Accordingly, the Company recorded a provisional charge of $7 million and $332 million in the provision for income taxes for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2018, respectively. As of March 31, 2018, $30 million and $302 million of the provisional charges are included in Other accrued liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Such charges remain provisional pending the finalization of earnings estimates of the Companys foreign subsidiaries and any further changes to the Companys indefinite reinvestment assertion on its applicable remaining foreign earnings.
During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recorded an adjustment to its provisional charge recorded in the fiscal 2018 second quarter associated with the remeasurement of its net deferred tax assets resulting from the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate. This adjustment was due to the revision of certain temporary differences. Accordingly, the Company recorded a provisional credit of $9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and a provisional charge of $42 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2018 which adjusted net deferred taxes. Our net deferred tax assets are included in Other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2018. The remeasurement of U.S. net deferred tax assets is provisional as the final remeasurement cannot be determined until the underlying temporary differences are known, rather than estimated.
In addition, as a result of the Transition Tax, the Company recorded a provisional charge of $18 million in the fiscal 2018 second quarter related to foreign withholding taxes for planned repatriation of certain foreign earnings. This net deferred tax liability is recorded as a reduction in net deferred tax assets which is included in Other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2018. This charge remains provisional due to uncertainty at this time related to the U.S. tax treatment of such foreign withholding taxes.
The Company is continuing to analyze the impact of the TCJA. Adjustments to the provisional charges will be recorded as discrete items in the provision for income taxes in the period in which those adjustments become reasonably estimable and/or the accounting is complete. Such adjustments may result from, among other things, future guidance, interpretations and regulatory changes from the Internal Revenue Service, the SEC, the FASB and/or various tax jurisdictions. The Company will complete its analysis no later than December 22, 2018.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
There are other potential impacts under the TCJA that are not effective for the Company until fiscal 2019. These primarily include a new minimum tax on global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI), the base erosion anti-abuse tax (BEAT) and the foreign derived intangibles income (FDII) provisions. The Company has not recorded any impact associated with these provisions at this time.
The effective rate for income taxes was 22.1% and 26.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. This decrease reflected a favorable impact of excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation awards of approximately 400 basis points, and an adjustment to the remeasurement of U.S. net deferred tax assets resulting from the TCJA of approximately 190 basis points. Partially offsetting these decreases were an adjustment to the Transition Tax resulting from the TCJA of approximately 150 basis points and tax reserve adjustments of approximately 20 basis points.
The effective rate for income taxes was 46.0% and 27.2% for the nine months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. This increase was primarily attributable to the Transition Tax of approximately 1,930 basis points, the remeasurement of U.S. net deferred tax assets of approximately 240 basis points, and the establishment of a net deferred tax liability related to certain foreign withholding taxes on planned repatriation of approximately 100 basis points, with each resulting from the enactment of the TCJA. Partially offsetting this increase was approximately 250 basis points due to a favorable impact of excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation awards, and approximately 140 basis points primarily reflecting a favorable geographic mix of earnings and a favorable impact of the reduced U.S. statutory tax rate.
As of March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of interest and penalties, totaled $68 million at the end of each period. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2018 that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was $48 million. The total gross accrued interest and penalty expense related to unrecognized tax benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2018 in the accompanying consolidated statement of earnings was $1 million. During the nine months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recognized a gross interest and penalty benefit of $1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of earnings. The total gross accrued interest and penalties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017 was $11 million and $13 million, respectively. On the basis of the information available as of March 31, 2018, the Company does not expect any significant changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.
Other Accrued Liabilities
Other accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
| ||
(In millions) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||
Advertising, merchandising and sampling |
|
$ |
429 |
|
$ |
319 |
|
Employee compensation |
|
505 |
|
522 |
| ||
Payroll and other taxes |
|
221 |
|
190 |
| ||
Accrued income taxes |
|
187 |
|
94 |
| ||
Other |
|
866 |
|
674 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
2,208 |
|
$ |
1,799 |
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
In February 2018, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that permits a reclassification of the stranded tax effects due to a change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate as a result of the TCJA from accumulated OCI (AOCI) to retained earnings. This guidance cannot be applied to stranded tax effects from changes previously recognized in AOCI unrelated to the TCJA. Furthermore, this accommodation to reclassify the stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA does not change the underlying guidance requiring that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations for future tax rate changes.
Effective for the Company Fiscal 2020 first quarter, with early adoption permitted. The guidance may be applied:
· retrospectively for periods in which the income tax effects of the TCJA related to items remaining in AOCI are recognized; or
· at the beginning of the period of adoption.
Impact on consolidated financial statements The Company has elected to early adopt this guidance at the beginning of its fiscal 2018 third quarter. As a result, the Company reclassified $32 million in tax effects from AOCI to retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. It is the Companys policy to use the portfolio approach to release income tax effects from AOCI. The Company may make further adjustments in subsequent periods if changes to the provisional amounts established as a result of the TCJA are recorded.
Compensation - Stock Compensation
In March 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that changes the way companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees. This new guidance requires that all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies related to share-based compensation awards be recorded as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. In addition, companies are required to treat the tax effects of exercised or vested awards as discrete items in the period that they occur. This guidance also permits an employer to withhold up to the maximum statutory withholding rates in a jurisdiction without triggering liability classification, allows companies to elect to account for forfeitures as they occur, and provides requirements for the cash flow classification of cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes and for the classification of excess tax benefits. The new guidance prescribes different transition methods for the various provisions.
Effective for the Company Fiscal 2018 first quarter.
Impact on consolidated financial statements As a result of the adoption of this guidance, during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recognized $19 million and $43 million, respectively, of excess tax benefits as a reduction to the provision for income taxes in its consolidated statements of earnings. Additionally, upon adoption the Company has included these excess tax benefits in cash flows from operating activities in the net earnings caption and will continue to classify cash paid for withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes in cash flows from financing activities. This guidance was applied prospectively, and prior-year periods have not been adjusted for these changes. The Company will also continue to accrue for estimated forfeitures each quarter. Finally, as the Company has no outstanding awards classified as a liability due to withholding excess taxes, there was no impact to the Companys consolidated balance sheets related to the adoption of that portion of the guidance.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Hedge Accounting
In August 2017, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to simplify hedge accounting. The guidance includes the provisions that:
· enable entities to better portray their risk management activities within the financial statements;
· expand an entitys ability to hedge nonfinancial and financial risk components;
· reduce complexity in fair value hedges of interest rate risk;
· eliminate the requirement to separately measure and disclose hedge ineffectiveness;
· require the entire change in fair value of a hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item;
· ease certain documentation and assessment requirements;
· modify the accounting for components excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness; and
· require revised tabular footnote disclosure.
The guidance also provides transition relief to make it easier for entities to apply certain amendments to existing hedges (including fair value hedges) where the hedge documentation is required to be modified.
Effective for the Company Fiscal 2020 first quarter, with early adoption permitted in any interim period. The guidance must be applied:
· using the modified retrospective approach for cash flow and net investment hedge relationships that exist on the date of adoption; and
· prospectively for the presentation and disclosure requirements.
Impact on consolidated financial statements The Company expects to early adopt this guidance in the beginning of its fiscal 2019 first quarter and does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Pension-related Costs
In March 2017, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that amends how companies present net periodic benefit cost in the income statement and balance sheet relating to defined benefit pension and/or other postretirement benefit plans. Within the income statement, the new guidance requires companies to report the service cost component within operating expenses and report the other components of net periodic benefit cost below operating income (if one is reported). In addition, within the balance sheet, the guidance changes the components of the pension cost eligible for capitalization to the service cost component only (e.g., as a cost of internally manufactured inventory or a self-constructed asset).
Effective for the Company Fiscal 2019 first quarter, with early adoption permitted as of the first interim period in fiscal 2018. The guidance must be applied:
· retrospectively as it pertains to the income statement classification of the components of net periodic benefit cost; and
· prospectively as it pertains to future capitalization of service costs.
Impact on consolidated financial statements The Company will adopt this guidance when it becomes effective and although certain components of pension expense will be reclassified out of operating income, the Company does not believe this will have a material impact on reported operating income.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Goodwill
In January 2017, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating the second step from the quantitative goodwill impairment test. The single quantitative step test requires companies to compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and record an impairment charge for the amount that the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, up to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The Company will continue to have the option of first performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test.
Effective for the Company Fiscal 2021 first quarter, with early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.
Impact on consolidated financial statements The Company did not elect to apply this guidance to its fiscal 2017 impairment testing and will continue to assess the impact of adopting it on future interim and annual impairment tests.
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
In June 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires companies to utilize an impairment model for most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other financial instruments, which include trade and other receivables, loans and held-to-maturity debt securities, to record an allowance for credit risk based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. In addition, this new guidance changes the recognition method for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which can occur as a result of market and credit risk, and requires additional disclosures. In general, modified retrospective adoption will be required for all outstanding instruments that fall under this guidance.
Effective for the Company Fiscal 2021 first quarter.
Impact on consolidated financial statements The Company is currently evaluating the impact of applying this guidance on its financial instruments, such as accounts receivable and short- and long-term investments.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires lessees to account for most leases on their balance sheets with the liability being equal to the present value of the lease payments. The right-of-use asset will be based on the lease liability adjusted for certain costs such as direct costs. Lease expense will be recognized similar to current accounting guidance with operating leases resulting in a straight-line expense, and financing leases resulting in a front-loaded expense similar to the current accounting for capital leases. This guidance must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements, and provides for certain practical expedients.
Effective for the Company Fiscal 2020 first quarter, with early adoption permitted.
Impact on consolidated financial statements The Company currently has an implementation team in place that is performing a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the adoption of this guidance. While the Company has not completed its evaluation, it believes the adoption of this standard will have a significant impact on its consolidated balance sheets. As disclosed in Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies in the notes to consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, the Company had $2,427 million in future minimum lease commitments as of June 30, 2017. Upon adoption, the Companys lease liability will generally be based on the present value of such payments, and the related right-of-use asset will generally be based on the lease liability, adjusted for initial direct costs.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In May 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that defines how companies should report revenues from contracts with customers. The standard requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. It provides companies with a single comprehensive five-step principles-based model to use in accounting for revenue and supersedes current revenue recognition requirements, including most industry-specific and transaction-specific revenue guidance.
In March 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that amended the principal versus agent guidance in its new revenue recognition standard. These amendments do not change the key aspects of the principal versus agent guidance, including the definition that an entity is a principal if it controls the good or service prior to it being transferred to a customer, but the amendments clarify the implementation guidance related to the considerations that must be made during the contract evaluation process.
In April 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that amended the new standard to clarify the guidance on identifying performance obligations and accounting for licenses of intellectual property.
In May 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that clarified certain terms, guidance and disclosure requirements during the transition period related to completed contracts and contract modifications. In addition, the FASB provided clarification on the concept of collectability, the calculation of the fair value of noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes.
In May 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to reflect the SEC Staffs rescission of its prior comments that covered, among other things, accounting for shipping and handling costs and accounting for consideration given by a vendor to a customer.
In December 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that amends various aspects of the new standard to clarify certain terms, guidance and disclosure requirements. In particular, the guidance addresses disclosure requirements for remaining performance obligations, impairment testing for contract costs and accrual of advertising costs, and clarifies several examples.
Effective for the Company Fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted. An entity is permitted to apply the foregoing guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented, with certain practical expedients, or apply the requirements in the year of adoption, through a cumulative adjustment.
Impact on consolidated financial statements The Company will apply all of this new guidance when it becomes effective in fiscal 2019 using the modified retrospective adoption method. Although the Company has not yet completed its evaluation, it has preliminarily determined that certain promotional goods, such as samples and testers, will be reclassified from Selling, general and administrative expenses to Cost of Sales in the consolidated financial statements upon adoption. The Company has assessed its third-party retailer arrangements and noted that upon adoption of the new revenue recognition standard, the Company will have a change in the classification of certain payments to customers as well as a change in the timing of certain accruals for variable consideration. Additionally, the Companys customer loyalty programs, which have historically been accounted for under the incremental cost approach, will be accounted for as a reduction of revenue based on the fair value of estimated future redemptions when the obligation is created (i.e. upon sale of the product to the consumer). Furthermore, the Company is continuing to assess the impact that its promotional goods and loyalty programs will have on the timing of revenue recognition upon adoption.
No other recently issued accounting pronouncements are expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 2 INVESTMENTS
Gains and losses recorded in AOCI related to the Companys available-for-sale investments as of March 31, 2018 were as follows:
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
Fair Value |
| ||||
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
$ |
435 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
$ |
430 |
|
Foreign government and agency securities |
|
114 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
112 |
| ||||
Corporate notes and bonds |
|
505 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
498 |
| ||||
Time deposits |
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
| ||||
Other securities |
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,269 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
$ |
1,255 |
|
Gains and losses recorded in AOCI related to the Companys available-for-sale investments as of June 30, 2017 were as follows:
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
Fair Value |
| ||||
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
$ |
464 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
464 |
|
Foreign government and agency securities |
|
103 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
102 |
| ||||
Corporate notes and bonds |
|
506 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
505 |
| ||||
Time deposits |
|
410 |
|
|
|
|
|
410 |
| ||||
Other securities |
|
16 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
17 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,499 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
$ |
1,498 |
|
The following table presents the Companys available-for-sale securities by contractual maturity as of March 31, 2018:
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value |
| ||
Due within one year |
|
$ |
385 |
|
$ |
384 |
|
Due after one through five years |
|
884 |
|
871 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
1,269 |
|
$ |
1,255 |
|
The following table presents the fair market value of the Companys investments with gross unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than temporarily impaired as of March 31, 2018:
|
|
In a Loss Position for Less Than 12 |
|
In a Loss Position for More Than 12 |
| ||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
Fair Value |
|
Gross Unrealized |
| ||||
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
710 |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
$ |
326 |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
Gross gains and losses on sales of investments included in the consolidated statements of earnings were not material for all periods presented.
The Company utilizes the first-in, first-out method to determine the cost of the security sold. Sales proceeds from investments classified as available-for-sale were $21 million and $200 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and were $317 million and $532 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table presents goodwill by product category and the related change in the carrying amount:
(In millions) |
|
Skin Care |
|
Makeup |
|
Fragrance |
|
Hair Care |
|
Total |
| |||||
Balance as of June 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Goodwill |
|
$ |
184 |
|
$ |
1,176 |
|
$ |
255 |
|
$ |
393 |
|
$ |
2,008 |
|
Accumulated impairments |
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
(35 |
) |
(92 |
) | |||||
|
|
149 |
|
1,176 |
|
233 |
|
358 |
|
1,916 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Goodwill acquired during the period |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
| |||||
Translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
8 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
15 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance as of March 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Goodwill |
|
186 |
|
1,183 |
|
264 |
|
394 |
|
2,027 |
| |||||
Accumulated impairments |
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
(35 |
) |
(96 |
) | |||||
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
$ |
240 |
|
$ |
359 |
|
$ |
1,931 |
|
Other intangible assets consist of the following:
|
|
March 31, 2018 |
|
June 30, 2017 |
| ||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Total Net |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Total Net |
| ||||||
Amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Customer lists and other |
|
$ |
698 |
|
$ |
319 |
|
$ |
379 |
|
$ |
696 |
|
$ |
279 |
|
$ |
417 |
|
License agreements |
|
43 |
|
43 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
43 |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
$ |
741 |
|
$ |
362 |
|
379 |
|
$ |
739 |
|
$ |
322 |
|
417 |
| ||
Non-amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Trademarks and other |
|
|
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
|
|
910 |
| ||||||
Total intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,327 |
|
The aggregate amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets was $13 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 and was $38 million and $22 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for the remainder of fiscal 2018 and for each of fiscal 2019 to 2022 is $14 million, $51 million, $44 million, $43 million and $42 million, respectively.
NOTE 4 CHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
In May 2016, the Company announced a multi-year initiative (Leading Beauty Forward, LBF or the Program) to build on its strengths and better leverage its cost structure to free resources for investment to continue its growth momentum. LBF is designed to enhance the Companys go-to-market capabilities, reinforce its leadership in global prestige beauty and continue creating sustainable value. The Company plans to approve specific initiatives under LBF through fiscal 2019 related to the optimization of select corporate functions, supply chain activities, and corporate and regional market support structures, as well as the exit of underperforming businesses, and expects to complete those initiatives through fiscal 2021. Inclusive of charges recorded from inception through March 31, 2018, the Company expects that LBF will result in related restructuring and other charges totaling between $600 million and $700 million before taxes. In connection with LBF, at this time, the Company estimates a net reduction over the duration of LBF in the range of approximately 900 to 1,200 positions globally, which is about 2.5% of its current workforce. This reduction takes into account the elimination of some positions, retraining and redeployment of certain employees and investment in new positions in key areas.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Program-to-Date Approvals
Of the $600 million to $700 million restructuring and other charges expected to be incurred, total cumulative charges approved by the Company through March 31, 2018, some of which were recorded during fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, were:
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
| |||||||
(In millions) |
|
(included in |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
Restructuring |
|
Other |
|
Total |
| |||||
Approval Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Fiscal 2016 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
28 |
|
$ |
87 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
190 |
|
Fiscal 2017 |
|
11 |
|
10 |
|
132 |
|
118 |
|
271 |
| |||||
Nine months ended March 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
141 |
|
53 |
|
208 |
| |||||
Adjustments through March 31, 2018 |
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) | |||||
Cumulative through March 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
$ |
52 |
|
$ |
334 |
|
$ |
242 |
|
$ |
641 |
|
Included in the above table, cumulative restructuring initiatives approved by the Company through March 31, 2018 by major cost type were:
(In millions) |
|
Employee- |
|
Asset- |
|
Contract |
|
Other Exit |
|
Total |
| |||||
Approval Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Fiscal 2016 |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
87 |
|
Fiscal 2017 |
|
126 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
132 |
| |||||
Nine months ended March 31, 2018 |
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
141 |
| |||||
Adjustments through March 31, 2018 |
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) | |||||
Cumulative through March 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
314 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
334 |
|
During the nine months ended March 31, 2018, the Company continued to approve initiatives to enhance its go-to-market support structures and optimize select corporate functions. These actions will result in a net reduction of the workforce, which includes position eliminations, the re-leveling of certain positions and an investment in new capabilities. The Company also approved consulting and other professional services primarily related to the implementation and integration of new processes and technologies and, to a lesser extent, other costs for temporary labor backfill and training and recruitment related to the new capabilities. The Company also continued to approve consulting fees and implementation costs for an initiative related to supply chain planning activities.
As initiatives under LBF progress through implementation, the Company has identified certain costs that were approved but will not be incurred. These costs, reflected as adjustments to the cumulative approved restructuring and other charges presented above, were primarily related to estimated employee-related costs for certain employees who either resigned or transferred to other existing positions within the Company.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Program-to-Date Restructuring and Other Charges
The Company records approved charges associated with restructuring and other activities once the relevant accounting criteria have been met. Total cumulative charges recorded associated with restructuring and other activities for LBF were:
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
| |||||||
(In millions) |
|
(included in |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
Restructuring |
|
Other |
|
Total |
| |||||
Fiscal 2016 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
81 |
|
Fiscal 2017 |
|
2 |
|
15 |
|
122 |
|
73 |
|
212 |
| |||||
Nine months ended March 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
125 |
|
73 |
|
207 |
| |||||
Cumulative through March 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
24 |
|
$ |
322 |
|
$ |
151 |
|
$ |
500 |
|
The major cost types related to the cumulative restructuring charges set forth above were:
(In millions) |
|
Employee- |
|
Asset- |
|
Contract |
|
Other Exit |
|
Total |
| |||||
Fiscal 2016 |
|
$ |
74 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
Fiscal 2017 |
|
116 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
122 |
| |||||
Nine months ended March 31, 2018 |
|
122 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
125 |
| |||||
Cumulative through March 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
312 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
322 |
|
Accrued restructuring charges from Program inception through March 31, 2018 were:
(In millions) |
|
Employee- |
|
Asset- |
|
Contract |
|
Other Exit |
|
Total |
| |||||
Charges |
|
$ |
74 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
Noncash asset write-offs |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) | |||||
Translation adjustments |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) | |||||
Balance at June 30, 2016 |
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Charges |
|
116 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
122 |
| |||||
Cash payments |
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(43 |
) | |||||
Noncash asset write-offs |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) | |||||
Balance at June 30, 2017 |
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Charges |
|
122 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
125 |
| |||||
Cash payments |
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
(65 |
) | |||||
Noncash asset write-offs |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) | |||||
Translation adjustments |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| |||||
Balance at March 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
212 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
Restructuring charges for employee-related costs are net of adjustments to the accrual estimate for certain employees who either resigned or transferred to other existing positions within the Company. These adjustments were not material for all periods presented. Accrued restructuring charges at March 31, 2018 are expected to result in cash expenditures funded from cash provided by operations of approximately $58 million, $117 million, $32 million and $5 million for the remainder of fiscal 2018 and for each of fiscal 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company addresses certain financial exposures through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts and may enter into option contracts to reduce the effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, the Company enters into interest rate derivatives to manage the effects of interest rate movements on the Companys aggregate liability portfolio, including potential future debt issuances. The Company also enters into foreign currency forward contracts and may use option contracts, not designated as hedging instruments, to mitigate the change in fair value of specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. The Company does not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Costs associated with entering into derivative financial instruments have not been material to the Companys consolidated financial results.
For each derivative contract entered into where the Company looks to obtain hedge accounting treatment, the Company formally and contemporaneously documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the hedging instruments effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed prospectively and retrospectively, and a description of the method of measuring ineffectiveness. This process includes linking all derivatives to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assesses, both at the inception of the hedges and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective, or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company will be required to discontinue hedge accounting with respect to that derivative prospectively.
The fair values of the Companys derivative financial instruments included in the consolidated balance sheets are presented as follows:
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
| ||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
58 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
23 |
|
3 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
3 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
47 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
3 |
|
2 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total Derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
49 |
|
(1) See Note 6 Fair Value Measurements for further information about how the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities are determined.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The amounts of the gains and losses related to the Companys derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Location of Gain or |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
| ||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
from AOCI into |
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
$ |
(35 |
) |
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
(10 |
) |
7 |
| ||||
Interest rate-related derivatives |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
1 |
| ||||
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
$ |
10 |
|
(1) The gain (loss) recognized in earnings related to the amount excluded from effectiveness testing and the amount related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships was not material for all periods presented.
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Location of Gain or |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) | |||||||||
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
from AOCI into |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
$ |
13 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
(21 |
) |
26 |
| ||||
Interest rate-related derivatives |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Interest expense |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| ||||
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
$ |
35 |
|
(1) The gain (loss) recognized in earnings related to the amount excluded from effectiveness testing and the amount related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships was not material for all periods presented.
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Derivatives |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||||
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
$ |
(3 |
) |
$ |
(23 |
) |
$ |
(25 |
) |
(1) Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements are exactly offset by the change in the fair value of the underlying long-term debt.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The amounts of the gains and losses related to the Companys derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Derivatives |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
(11 |
) |
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
(10 |
) |
Cash-Flow Hedges
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge anticipated transactions, as well as receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies, for periods consistent with the Companys identified exposures. The purpose of the hedging activities is to minimize the effect of foreign exchange rate movements on costs and on the cash flows that the Company receives from foreign subsidiaries. The majority of foreign currency forward contracts are denominated in currencies of major industrial countries. The Company may also enter into foreign currency option contracts to hedge anticipated transactions where there is a high probability that anticipated exposures will materialize. The foreign currency forward contracts entered into to hedge anticipated transactions have been designated as cash-flow hedges and have varying maturities through the end of March 2020. Hedge effectiveness of foreign currency forward contracts is based on a hypothetical derivative methodology and excludes the portion of fair value attributable to the spot-forward difference which is recorded in current-period earnings. Hedge effectiveness of foreign currency option contracts is based on a dollar offset methodology.
The Company may enter into interest rate forward contracts to hedge anticipated issuance of debt for periods consistent with the Companys identified exposures. The purpose of the hedging activities is to minimize the effect of interest rate movements on the cost of debt issuance.
The ineffective portion of both foreign currency forward and interest rate derivatives is recorded in current-period earnings. For hedge contracts that are no longer deemed highly effective, hedge accounting is discontinued and gains and losses in AOCI are reclassified to earnings when the underlying forecasted transaction occurs. If it is probable that the forecasted transaction will no longer occur, then any gains or losses in AOCI are reclassified to current-period earnings. As of March 31, 2018, the Companys foreign currency cash-flow hedges were highly effective.
At March 31, 2018, the Company had foreign currency forward contracts in the amount of $3,392 million. The foreign currencies included in foreign currency forward contracts (notional value stated in U.S. dollars) are principally the Swiss franc ($756 million), Hong Kong dollar ($444 million), Euro ($415 million), British pound ($401 million), Canadian dollar ($161 million), Thailand baht ($158 million), Taiwan dollar ($125 million), Australian dollar ($125 million) and Japanese yen ($121 million).
The estimated net loss on the Companys derivative instruments designated as cash-flow hedges as of March 31, 2018 that is expected to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings, net of tax, within the next twelve months is $32 million. The accumulated net loss on derivative instruments in AOCI was $23 million and $4 million as of March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017, respectively.
Fair-Value Hedges
The Company enters into interest rate derivative contracts to manage the exposure to interest rate fluctuations on its funded indebtedness. The Company has interest rate swap agreements, with notional amounts totaling $250 million, $450 million and $250 million to effectively convert the fixed rate interest on its 2020 Senior Notes, 2021 Senior Notes and 2022 Senior Notes, respectively, to variable interest rates based on three-month LIBOR plus a margin. These interest rate swap agreements are designated as fair-value hedges of the related long-term debt, and the changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements are exactly offset by the change in the fair value of the underlying long-term debt.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Credit Risk
As a matter of policy, the Company enters into derivative contracts only with counterparties that have a long-term credit rating of at least A- or higher by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies. The counterparties to these contracts are major financial institutions. Exposure to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by any of the counterparties is limited to the gross fair value of contracts in asset positions, which totaled $5 million at March 31, 2018. To manage this risk, the Company has strict counterparty credit guidelines that are continually monitored. Accordingly, management believes risk of loss under these hedging contracts is remote.
NOTE 6 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company records certain of its financial assets and liabilities at fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The accounting for fair value measurements must be applied to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that require initial measurement or remeasurement at fair value, which principally consist of assets and liabilities acquired through business combinations and goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets for the purposes of calculating potential impairment. The Company is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1: Inputs based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Inputs reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the instruments valuation.
The following table presents the Companys hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2018:
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
| ||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
430 |
| ||||
Foreign government and agency securities |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
112 |
| ||||
Corporate notes and bonds |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
498 |
| ||||
Time deposits |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
| ||||
Other securities |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,260 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
| ||||
Contingent consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
133 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
133 |
|
$ |
217 |
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table presents the Companys hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2017:
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
| ||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
| ||||
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
464 |
| ||||
Foreign government and agency securities |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
102 |
| ||||
Corporate notes and bonds |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
505 |
| ||||
Time deposits |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
410 |
| ||||
Other securities |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,511 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
| ||||
Contingent consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
139 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
$ |
139 |
|
$ |
188 |
|
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||||||
|
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
| ||||
Nonderivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,140 |
|
$ |
2,140 |
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
1,255 |
|
1,255 |
|
1,498 |
|
1,498 |
| ||||
Current and long-term debt |
|
3,659 |
|
3,827 |
|
3,572 |
|
3,759 |
| ||||
Additional purchase price payable |
|
38 |
|
38 |
|
38 |
|
38 |
| ||||
Contingent consideration |
|
133 |
|
133 |
|
139 |
|
139 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts asset (liability), net |
|
(56 |
) |
(56 |
) |
(36 |
) |
(36 |
) | ||||
Interest rate swap contracts asset (liability), net |
|
(23 |
) |
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
| ||||
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the Companys financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and cash equivalents Cash and all highly-liquid securities with original maturities of three months or less are classified as cash and cash equivalents, primarily consisting of cash deposits in interest bearing accounts, money market funds and time deposits. The carrying amount approximates fair value, primarily due to the short maturity of cash equivalent instruments.
Available-for-sale securities Available-for-sale securities are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy and are valued using third-party pricing services, and for time deposits, the carrying amount approximates fair value. To determine fair value, the pricing services use market prices or prices derived from other observable market inputs such as benchmark curves, credit spreads, broker/dealer quotes, and other industry and economic factors.
Foreign currency forward contracts The fair values of the Companys foreign currency forward contracts were determined using an industry-standard valuation model, which is based on an income approach. The significant observable inputs to the model, such as swap yield curves and currency spot and forward rates, were obtained from an independent pricing service. To determine the fair value of contracts under the model, the difference between the contract price and the current forward rate was discounted using LIBOR for contracts with maturities up to 12 months, and swap yield curves for contracts with maturities greater than 12 months.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Interest rate swap contracts The fair values of the Companys interest rate swap contracts were determined using an industry-standard valuation model, which is based on the income approach. The significant observable inputs to the model, such as treasury yield curves, swap yield curves and LIBOR forward rates, were obtained from independent pricing services.
Current and long-term debt The fair value of the Companys debt was estimated based on the current rates offered to the Company for debt with the same remaining maturities. To a lesser extent, debt also includes capital lease obligations for which the carrying amount approximates the fair value. The Companys debt is classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Additional purchase price payable The Companys additional purchase price payable represents fixed minimum additional purchase price that was discounted using the Companys incremental borrowing rate, which was approximately 1%. The additional purchase price payable is classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Contingent consideration Contingent consideration obligations consist of potential obligations related to the Companys acquisitions in previous years. The amounts to be paid under these obligations are contingent upon the achievement of stipulated financial targets by the business subsequent to acquisition. The fair values of the contingent consideration related to certain acquisition earn-outs were estimated using a probability-weighted discount model that considers the achievement of the conditions upon which the respective contingent obligation is dependent (Monte Carlo Method).
The Monte Carlo Method has various inputs into the valuation model, in addition to the risk-adjusted projected future operating results of the acquired entities, which include the following ranges at March 31, 2018:
Risk-adjusted discount rate |
|
2.7% to 3.1% |
|
Revenue volatility |
|
4.7% to 5.4% |
|
Asset volatility |
|
20.9% to 24.0% |
|
Revenue and earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization correlation coefficient factor |
|
80.0% |
|
Revenue discount rates |
|
4.7% to 4.8% |
|
Earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization discount rates |
|
12.9% to 14.2% |
|
Significant changes in the projected future operating results would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. Changes to the discount rates, volatilities or correlation factors would have a lesser effect. The implied rates are deemed to be unobservable inputs and, as such, the Companys contingent consideration is classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration obligations for the nine months ended March 31, 2018 are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings and were as follows:
(In millions) |
|
Fair Value |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Contingent consideration at June 30, 2017 |
|
$ |
139 |
|
Changes in fair value |
|
(6 |
) | |
Contingent consideration at March 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
133 |
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 7 PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Company maintains pension plans covering substantially all of its full-time employees for its U.S. operations and a majority of its international operations. The Company also maintains post-retirement benefit plans that provide certain medical and dental benefits to eligible employees. Descriptions of these plans are included in the notes to consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other than |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
Pension Plans |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
U.S. |
|
International |
|
Post-retirement |
| ||||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
| ||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |