Edgar Filing: PARKE BANCORP, INC.

f10q_063013-0343.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2013.

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File No. 000-51338

PARKE BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New Jersey		65-1241959
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

601 Delsea Drive, Washington Township, New Jersey		08080
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

856-256-2500

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer", and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [X]

As of August 14, 2013, there were issued and outstanding 5,982,810 shares of the registrant's common stock.

PARKE BANCORP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

INDEX

		Page
Part I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	41
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	52
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	52

Part II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	52
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	52
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	52
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	52
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	53
Item 5.	Other Information	53
Item 6.	Exhibits	53

SIGNATURES

EXHIBITS and CERTIFICATIONS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Parke Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(in thousands except share and per share data)
	June 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
Assets
Cash and due from financial institutions	$	3,598		$	2,601
Federal funds sold and cash equivalents		33,491			74,265
Cash and cash equivalents		37,089			76,866
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value		17,531			19,340
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $2,139 at June 30, 2013 and $2,239 at December 31, 2012)		2,084			2,066
Total investment securities		19,615			21,406
Loans held for sale		698			495
Loans, net of unearned income		644,024			629,712
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(20,867	)		(18,936	)
Net loans		623,157			610,776
Accrued interest receivable		2,762			2,727
Premises and equipment, net		4,012			3,989
Other real estate owned (OREO)		23,669			26,057
Restricted stock, at cost		2,047			2,223
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI)		10,928			10,743
Deferred tax asset		4,815			4,696
Other assets		9,571			10,499
Total Assets	$	738,363		$	770,477

Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	29,945		$	30,342
Interest-bearing deposits		579,574			606,865
Total deposits		609,519			637,207
FHLBNY borrowings		20,365			20,448
Other borrowed funds		5,000			10,000
Subordinated debentures		13,403			13,403
Accrued interest payable		475			537
Other liabilities		4,734			5,339
Total liabilities		653,496			686,934
Equity
Preferred stock, cumulative perpetual, $1,000 liquidation value; authorized 1,000,000 shares; Issued: 16,288 shares at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		16,168			16,065
Common stock, $.10 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; Issued: 6,193,710 shares at June 30, 2013 and 5,594,793 shares at December 31, 2012		619			560
Additional paid-in capital		52,665			48,869
Retained earnings		19,464			21,068
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(858	)		(745	)
Treasury stock, 210,900 shares at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, at cost		(2,180	)		(2,180	)
Total shareholders’ equity		85,878			83,637
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries		(1,011	)		(94	)
Total equity		84,867			83,543
Total liabilities and equity	$	738,363		$	770,477

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

Parke Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
	For the six months ended June 30,						For the three months ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(in thousands except share data)						(in thousands except share data)
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	17,811		$	18,871		$	8,765		$	9,358
Interest and dividends on investments		383			540			179			252
Interest on federal funds sold and cash equivalents		73			119			33			66
Total interest income		18,267			19,530			8,977			9,676
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		2,664			3,459			1,289			1,687
Interest on borrowings		426			475			204			233
Total interest expense		3,090			3,934			1,493			1,920
Net interest income		15,177			15,596			7,484			7,756
Provision for loan losses		(2,000	)		(4,300	)		(1,000	)		(2,050	)
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		13,177			11,296			6,484			5,706
Noninterest income:
Gain on sale of SBA loans		1,468			1,357			969			755
Loan fees		323			159			161			105
Net income from BOLI		185			91			94			46
Service fees on deposit accounts		116			104			65			54
Loss on sale and write-down of real estate owned		(455	)		(625	)		(91	)		(537	)
Other		323			528			113			108
Total noninterest income		1,960			1,614			1,311			531
Noninterest expense:
Compensation and benefits		3,382			2,852			1,724			1,410
Professional services		756			776			439			500
Occupancy and equipment		483			531			239			267
Data processing		243			203			132			109
FDIC insurance		544			546			296			276
OREO expense		788			687			403			318
Other operating expense		1,759			1,902			994			1,110
Total noninterest expense		7,955			7,497			4,227			3,990
Income before income tax expense		7,182			5,413			3,568			2,247
Income tax expense		2,810			1,529			1,397			257
Net income attributable to Company and noncontrolling interest		4,372			3,884			2,171			1,990
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		(247	)		(248	)		(183	)		(141	)
Net income attributable to Company		4,125			3,636			1,988			1,849
Preferred stock dividend and discount accretion		(510	)		(504	)		(256	)		(253	)
Net income available to common shareholders	$	3,615		$	3,132		$	1,732		$	1,596

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.61		$	0.53		$	0.29		$	0.27
Diluted	$	0.61		$	0.53		$	0.29		$	0.27
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		5,944,915			5,916,502			5,962,623			5,917,118
Diluted		5,944,915			5,916,502			5,963,644			5,917,118
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

Parke Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(unaudited)
	For the six months ended June 30,						For the three months ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Net income attributable to Company	$	4,125		$	3,636		$	1,988		$	1,849
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities:
Non-credit related unrealized gains on securities with OTTI		15			32			3			44
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities without OTTI		(304	)		50			(243	)		32
Tax Impact		116			(33	)		96			(30	)
Less reclassification adjustment for gain on sales of securities realized in net income		—			—			—			—
Less reclassification adjustment for credit related OTTI realized in net income		—			—			—			—
Total unrealized (losses) gains on securities		(173	)		49			(144	)		46
Gross pension liability adjustments		100			12			47			10
Tax Impact		(40	)		(5	)		(19	)		(3	)
Total pension liability adjustment		60			7			28			7
Total other comprehensive (loss) income		(113	)		56			(116	)		53
Total comprehensive income	$	4,012		$	3,692		$	1,872		$	1,902
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

Parke Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(unaudited)
	Preferred Stock			Shares of Common Stock		Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital				Retained Earnings				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss				Treasury Stock				Total Shareholders’ Equity				Non- Controlling Interest				Total Equity
	(in thousands except share data)
Balance, December 31, 2012		$	16,065		5,594,793		$	560		$	48,869			$	21,068			$	(745	)		$	(2,180	)		$	83,637			$	(94	)		$	83,543
Capital withdrawals by noncontrolling interest																															(1,164	)			(1,164	)
Stock options exercised					57,591			6			284																290								290
Redemption of Warrant											(930	)			(720	)											(1,650	)							(1,650	)
10% common stock dividend					541,612			53			4,442				(4,497	)											(2	)							(2	)
Net income															4,125												4,125				247				4,372
Changes in other comprehensive income																			(113	)							(113	)							(113	)
Dividend on preferred stock (5% annually)															(409	)											(409	)							(409	)
Accretion of discount on preferred stock			103												(103	)											—								—
Balance, June 30, 2013		$	16,168		6,193,996		$	619		$	52,665			$	19,464			$	(858	)		$	(2,180	)		$	85,878			$	(1,011	)		$	84,867
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

Parke Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
	For the six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012
	(Amounts in thousands)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	4,372		$	3,884
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		169			183
Provision for loan losses		2,000			4,300
Bank owned life insurance		(185	)		(91	)
Supplemental executive retirement plan expense		17			68
Gain on sale of SBA loans		(1,468	)		(1,357	)
SBA loans originated for sale		(11,831	)		(12,784	)
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans originated for sale		13,096			14,366
Loss on sale & write down of other real estate owned		455			625
Net accretion of purchase premiums and discounts on securities		21			(11	)
Deferred income tax benefit		(119	)		602
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable and other assets		893			(2,031	)
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable and other accrued liabilities		(605	)		1,144
Net cash provided by operating activities		6,815			8,898
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Purchases of investment securities available for sale		(2,022	)		(4,148	)
Redemptions of restricted stock		176			1,338
Proceeds from sale and call of securities available for sale		1,000			—
Proceeds from maturities and principal payments on mortgage backed securities		2,501			3,189
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		3,157			1,246
Advances on other real estate owned		(64	)		(207	)
Net (increase) decrease in loans		(15,541	)		5,961
Purchases of bank premises and equipment		(93	)		(191	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(10,886	)		7,188
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Payment of dividend on preferred stock		(409	)		(407	)
Cash payment of fractional shares on 10% stock dividend		(2	)		(1	)
Minority interest capital withdrawal, net		(1,164	)		(759	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		290			35
Redemption payment for TARP Warrant		(1,650	)		—
Net decrease in FHLBNY and short term borrowings		(83	)		(30,078	)
Net decrease in other borrowed funds		(5,000	)		—
Net (decrease) increase in noninterest-bearing deposits		(397	)		1,733
Net (decrease) increase in interest-bearing deposits		(27,291	)		22,142
Net cash used in financing activities		(35,706	)		(7,335	)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(39,777	)		8,751
Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1,		76,866			110,228
Cash and Cash Equivalents, June 30,	$	37,089		$	118,979
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest on deposits and borrowed funds	$	3,152		$	3,937
Income taxes	$	2,708		$	2,365
Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Activities:
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans	$	1,160		$	8,981

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION

Parke Bancorp, Inc. ("Parke Bancorp” or the "Company") is a bank holding company incorporated under the laws of the State of New Jersey in January 2005 for the sole purpose of becoming the holding company of Parke Bank (the "Bank").

The Bank is a commercial bank which commenced operations on January 28, 1999. The Bank is chartered by the New Jersey Department of Banking and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"). Parke Bancorp and the Bank maintain their principal offices at 601 Delsea Drive, Washington Township, New Jersey. The Bank also conducts business through branches in Galloway Township, Northfield and Washington Township, New Jersey and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The Bank competes with other banking and financial institutions in its primary market areas. Commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions and money market funds actively compete for savings and time certificates of deposit and all types of loans. Such institutions, as well as consumer financial and insurance companies, may be considered competitors of the Bank with respect to one or more of the services it renders.

The Bank is subject to the regulations of certain state and federal agencies, and accordingly, the Bank is periodically examined by such regulatory authorities. As a consequence of the regulation of commercial banking activities, the Bank’s business is particularly susceptible to future state and federal legislation and regulations.

The FDIC and the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance Consent Orders: On April 9, 2012, the Bank entered into Consent Orders with the FDIC and the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance (the “Department”). Under the Consent Orders, the terms of which are substantially identical, the Bank is required, among other things, subject to review and approval by the FDIC and the Department: (i) to adopt and implement a plan to reduce the Bank’s position in delinquent or classified assets; (ii) to adopt and implement a program providing for a periodic independent review of the Bank’s loan portfolio and the identification of problem credits; (iii) to review and revise the Bank’s loan policies and procedures to address identified lending deficiencies; and (iv) to adopt and implement a plan to reduce and manage each of the concentrations of credit identified by the FDIC and the Department.

The Consent Orders also require the Bank to obtain the prior approval of the FDIC and the New Jersey Department before declaring or paying any dividend or appointing or changing the title or responsibilities of any director or senior executive officer. Additional regulatory provisions require FDIC prior approval before the Bank enters into any employment agreement or other agreement or plan providing for the payment of a “golden parachute payment” or the making of any golden parachute payment. The Bank believes it is in substantial compliance with the terms of the Consent Order.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation: The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and predominant practices within the banking industry.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary the Bank. Also included are the accounts of 44 Business Capital Partners LLC, a joint venture formed in 2009 to originate and service SBA loans. The Bank has a 51% ownership interest in the

joint venture. Parke Capital Trust I, Parke Capital Trust II and Parke Capital Trust III are wholly-owned subsidiaries but are not consolidated because they do not meet the requirements for consolidation under applicable accounting guidance. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 since they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP. The accompanying interim financial statements for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are unaudited. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2012, was derived from the audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, these financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for such interim periods. Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term include the allowance for loan losses, other than temporary impairment losses on investment securities, the valuation of deferred income taxes, servicing assets and carrying value of OREO.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, “Balance Sheet, Disclosure about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (Topic 210)”. The objective of this update is to provide enhanced disclosures that will enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on an entity’s financial position. This includes the effect or potential effect of rights of setoff associated with an entity’s recognized assets and recognized liabilities within the scope of this Update. The amendments require enhanced disclosures by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45. These amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. Adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, “Balance Sheet, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (Topic 210)”. The amendments in this update clarify that the scope of ASU 2011-11 applies to derivatives accounted for in accordance with Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. An entity is required to apply the amendments for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the required disclosures retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. Adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)”. The amendments in this

update aim to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments in this update seek to attain that objective by requiring an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is reclassified to a balance sheet account instead of directly to income or expense in the same reporting period. For public entities, the amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company adopted the amendments of ASU 2011-12 effective January 1, 2013 and has applied the amendments retrospectively. Adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The following is a summary of the Company's investments in available for sale and held to maturity securities as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

As of June 30, 2013	Amortized cost			Gross unrealized gains			Gross unrealized losses			Other-than- temporary impairments in OCI			Fair value
Available for sale:	(Amounts in thousands)
Available for sale:
U.S. Government sponsored entities		$	7		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	7
Corporate debt obligations			500			7			—			—			507
Residential mortgage-backed securities			12,054			323			129			—			12,248
Collateralized mortgage obligations			701			37			—			—			738
Collateralized debt obligations			5,556			—			1,041			484			4,031
Total available for sale		$	18,818		$	367		$	1,170		$	484		$	17,531

Held to maturity:
States and political subdivisions		$	2,084		$	55		$	—		$	—		$	2,139

As of December 31, 2012	Amortized cost			Gross unrealized gains			Gross unrealized losses			Other-than- temporary impairments in OCI			Fair value
Available for sale:	(Amounts in thousands)
Available for sale:
U.S. Government sponsored entities		$	7		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	7
Corporate debt obligations			1,500			24			—			—			1,524
Residential mortgage-backed securities			12,359			540			—			—			12,899
Collateralized mortgage obligations			916			58			—			—			974
Collateralized debt obligations			5,556			—			1,121			499			3,936
Total available for sale		$	20,338		$	622		$	1,121		$	499		$	19,340

Held to maturity:
States and political subdivisions		$	2,066		$	173		$	—		$	—		$	2,239

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities classified as available for sale and held to maturity, by contractual maturity as of June 30, 2013 are as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(Amounts in thousands)
Available for sale:
Due within one year	$	—	$	—
Due after one year through five years		—		—
Due after five years through ten years		—		—
Due after ten years		6,063		4,545
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations		12,755		12,986
Total available for sale	$	18,818	$	17,531

Held to maturity:
Due within one year	$	—	$	—
Due after one year through five years		—		—
Due after five years through ten years		—		—
Due after ten years		2,084		2,139
Total held to maturity	$	2,084	$	2,139

Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities for mortgage related securities because the issuers of certain debt securities do have the right to call or prepay their obligations without any penalty.

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, approximately $12.4 million and $10.3 million, respectively, of investment securities were pledged as collateral for borrowed funds. In addition, securities with a carrying value of $6.7 million and $4.2 million, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company's investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other than temporarily impaired (“OTTI”), aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

As of June 30, 2013	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Greater				Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(Amounts in thousands)
Available for sale:
Residential mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations		5,992		129		—		—		5,992		129
Collateralized debt obligations		—		—		3,709		1,041		3,709		1,041
Total available for sale	$	5,992	$	129	$	3,709	$	1,041	$	9,701	$	1,170

Held to maturity:
States and political subdivisions	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

As of December 31, 2012	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Greater				Total
Desriptin of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(Amoutns in thousands)
Available for sale:
Collateralized debt obligations		—		—		3,629		1,121		3,629		1,121
Total available for sale	$	—	$	—	$	3,629	$	1,121	$	3,629	$	1,121

Held to maturity:
States and political subdivisions	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations: The unrealized losses on the Company’s investment in mortgage-backed securities relates to four securities. The losses were caused by movement in interest rates. The securities were issued by FNMA, a government sponsored entity. It is expected that the U.S. government will guarantee all contractual cash flows. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investment and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, it does not consider the investment in these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2013.

Collateralized Debt Obligations: The Company’s unrealized loss on investments in collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) relates to three securities issued by financial institutions, totaling $3.7 million. CDOs are pooled securities primarily secured by trust preferred securities (“TruPS”), subordinated debt and surplus notes issued by small and mid-sized banks and insurance companies. These securities are generally floating rate instruments with 30-year maturities, and are callable at par by the issuer after five years. The current economic downturn has had a significant adverse impact on the financial services industry; consequently, TruPS CDOs do not have an active trading market. With the assistance of competent third-party valuation specialists, the Company utilized the following methodology to determine the fair value:

Cash flows were developed based on the estimated speeds at which the trust preferred securities are expected to prepay (a range of 1% to 2%), the estimated rates at which the trust preferred securities are expected to defer payments, the estimated rates at which the trust preferred securities are expected to default (a range of 0.57% to 0.66%), and the severity of the losses on securities which default (95%). Trust preferred securities generally allow for prepayment by the issuer without a prepayment penalty any time after five years. Due to the lack of new trust preferred issuances and the relatively poor conditions of the financial institution industry, a relatively modest rate of prepayment was assumed going forward. Estimates for conditional default rates (“CDR”) are based on the payment characteristics of the trust preferred securities themselves (e.g. current, deferred, or defaulted) as well as the financial condition of the trust preferred issuers in the pool. Estimates for the near-term rates of deferral and CDR are based on key financial ratios relating to the financial institutions’ capitalization, asset quality, profitability and liquidity. Finally, we consider whether or not the financial institution has received TARP funding, and if it has, the amount. Longer-term rates of deferral and defaults are based on historical averages. The fair value of each bond was assessed by discounting its projected cash flows by a discount rate. The discount rates were based on the yields of publicly traded TruPS and preferred stock issued by comparably rated banks (3 month LIBOR plus a spread of 400 to 959 basis points). The fair value for previous reporting periods was based on indicative market bids and resulted in much lower values due to the inactive trading market.

The underlying issuers have been analyzed, and projections have been made regarding the future performance, considering factors including defaults and interest deferrals. The analysis indicates that the

Company should expect to receive all contractual cash flows. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, it does not consider these investments to be other than temporarily impaired at June 30, 2013.

Other Than Temporarily Impaired Debt Securities

We assess whether we intend to sell or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit losses. For debt securities that are considered other than temporarily impaired and that we do not intend to sell and will not be required to sell prior to recovery of our amortized cost basis, we separate the amount of the impairment into the amount that is credit related (credit loss component) and the amount due to all other factors. The credit loss component is recognized in earnings and is the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows. The remaining difference between the security’s fair value and the present value of future expected cash flows is due to factors that are not credit related and is recognized in other comprehensive income.

The present value of expected future cash flows is determined using the best estimate of cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit to the security at the date of purchase or the current yield to accrete an asset-backed or floating rate security. The methodology and assumptions for establishing the best estimate cash flows vary depending on the type of security. The asset-backed securities cash flow estimates are based on bond specific facts and circumstances that may include collateral characteristics, expectations of delinquency and default rates, loss severity and prepayment speeds and structural support, including subordination and guarantees. The corporate bond cash flow estimates are derived from scenario-based outcomes of expected corporate restructurings or the disposition of assets using bond specific facts and circumstances including timing, security interests and loss severity.

We have a process in place to identify debt securities that could potentially have a credit impairment that is other than temporary. This process involves monitoring late payments, pricing levels, downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements, revenue forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues. On a quarterly basis, we review all securities to determine whether an OTTI exists and whether losses should be recognized. We consider relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether a credit or interest rate-related impairment of a security is other than temporary. Relevant facts and circumstances considered include: (1) the extent and length of time the fair value has been below cost; (2) the reasons for the decline in value; (3) the financial position and access to capital of the issuer, including the current and future impact of any specific events; and (4) for fixed maturity securities, our intent to sell a security or whether it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost which, in some cases, may extend to maturity.

The following table presents a roll-forward of the credit loss component of the amortized cost of debt securities that we have written down for OTTI and the credit component of the loss that is recognized in earnings. OTTI recognized in earnings for credit-impaired debt securities is presented as additions in two components based upon whether the current period is the first time the debt security was credit-impaired (initial credit impairment) or is not the first time the debt security was credit impaired (subsequent credit impairments). The credit loss component is reduced if we sell, intend to sell or believe we will be required to sell previously credit-impaired debt securities. Additionally, the credit loss component is reduced if we receive cash flows in excess of what we expected to receive over the remaining life of the credit-impaired debt security, the security matures or is fully written down. Changes in the credit loss component of credit-impaired debt securities were as follows for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012

	(Amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	1,219		$	1,950
Initial credit impairment		—			—
Subsequent credit impairments		—			—
Reductions for amounts recognized in earnings due to intent or requirement to sell		—			—
Reductions for securities sold		—			—
Reductions for securities deemed worthless		(54	)		(399	)
Reductions for increases in cash flows expected to be collected		—			—
Ending balance	$	1,165		$	1,551

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012

	(Amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	1,165	$	1,551
Initial credit impairment		—		—
Subsequent credit impairments		—		—
Reductions for amounts recognized in earnings due to intent or requirement to sell		—		—
Reductions for securities sold		—		—
Reductions for securities deemed worthless		—		—
Reductions for increases in cash flows expected to be collected		—		—
Ending balance	$	1,165	$	1,551

There were no investment gains and losses recognized in income during the six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

NOTE 4. LOANS

The portfolio of loans outstanding consists of:

		June 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
		Amount	Percentage of Total Loans			Amount	Percentage of Total Loans
		(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	24,828	3.9	%	$	21,925		3.5	%
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		7,726	1.2			7,331		1.2
Commercial		47,476	7.4			41,875		6.6
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		156,992	24.4			157,616		25.0
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		222,696	34.6			221,731		35.2
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		146,706	22.8			140,164		22.3
Residential – Multifamily		20,064	3.1			21,181		3.4
Consumer		17,536	2.6			17,889		2.8
Total Loans	$	644,024	100.0	%	$	629,712		100.0	%

Loan Origination/Risk Management: In the normal course of business the Company is exposed to a variety of operational, reputational, legal, regulatory and credit risks that could adversely affect our financial performance. Most of our asset risk is primarily tied to credit (lending) risk. The Company has lending policies, guidelines and procedures in place that are designed to maximize loan income within an acceptable level of risk. The Board of Directors reviews and approves these policies, guidelines and procedures. When we originate a loan we make certain subjective judgments about the borrower’s ability to meet the loan’s terms and conditions. We also make objective and subjective value assessments on the assets we finance. The borrower’s ability to repay can be adversely affected by economic changes. Likewise, changes in market conditions and other external factors can affect asset valuations. The Company actively monitors the quality of its loan portfolio. A reporting system supplements the credit review process by providing management with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit risk, loan delinquencies, troubled debt restructures, nonperforming and potential problem loans. Diversification in the loan portfolio is another means of managing risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions.

With respect to construction loans to developers and builders that are secured by non-owner occupied properties, the Company generally requires the borrower to have had an existing relationship with the Company and have a proven record of success. Construction loans are underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates and financial analyses of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally underwritten based upon estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Company until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate

repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.

Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial loans, in addition to those of real estate loans. Commercial real estate loans may be riskier than loans for one-to-four family residences and are typically larger in dollar size. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. The repayment of these loans is generally largely dependent on the successful operation and management of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing the Company’s commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type and geographic location within our market area. This diversity helps reduce the Company's exposure to adverse economic events that affect any single market or industry. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. The Company also monitors economic conditions and trends affecting market areas it serves. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans.

Consumer loans may carry a higher degree of repayment risk than residential mortgage loans. Repayment is typically dependent upon the borrower’s financial stability which is more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, illness, or personal bankruptcy. To monitor and manage consumer loan risk, policies and procedures have been developed and modified as needed. This activity, coupled with relatively small loan amounts that are spread across many individual borrowers, minimizes risk. Additionally, trend and outlook reports are reviewed by management on a regular basis. Underwriting standards for home equity loans are heavily influenced by statutory requirements, which include, but are not limited to, a maximum loan-to-value percentage of 80%, collection remedies, the number of such loans a borrower can have at one time and documentation requirements. Historically the Company’s losses on consumer loans have been negligible.

The Company maintains an outsourced independent loan review program that reviews and validates the credit risk assessment program on a periodic basis. Results of these external independent reviews are presented to management. The external independent loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit risk management personnel.

Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans: Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, in management's opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payment obligations as they become due, as well as when a loan is 90 days past due, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection, as required by regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on non-accrual status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of principal due. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

An age analysis of past due loans by class at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 follows:

June 30, 2013	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days and Not Accruing		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans
	(Amounts in thousands)

Commercial and Industrial	$	—	$	—	$	130	$	130	$	24,698	$	24,828
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		—		—		845		845		6,881		7,726
Commercial		—		—		12,961		12,961		34,515		47,476
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		—		—		1,058		1,058		155,934		156,992
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		—		—		19,118		19,118		203,578		222,696
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		5,565		—		9,421		14,986		131,720		146,706
Residential – Multifamily		—		—		1,467		1,467		18,597		20,064
Consumer		58		—		252		310		17,226		17,536
Total Loans	$	5,623	$	—	$	45,252	$	50,875	$	593,149	$	644,024

December 31, 2012	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days and Not Accruing		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans
	(Amounts in thousands)

Commercial and Industrial	$	—	$	—	$	248	$	248	$	21,677	$	21,925
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		—		—		799		799		6,532		7,331
Commercial		—		—		12,958		12,958		28,917		41,875
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		—		—		1,218		1,218		156,398		157,616
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		6,439		—		19,228		25,667		196,064		221,731
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		1,703		169		10,072		11,944		128,220		140,164
Residential – Multifamily		—		—		2,838		2,838		18,343		21,181
Consumer		71		49		188		308		17,581		17,889
Total Loans	$	8,213	$	218	$	47,549	$	55,980	$	573,732	$	629,712

Impaired Loans: Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest payments.

All impaired loans have are assessed for recoverability based on an independent third-party full appraisal to determine the net realizable value (“NRV”) based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, less cost to sell and other costs, such as unpaid real estate taxes, that have been identified, or the present value of discounted cash flows in the case of certain impaired loans that are not collateral dependent. The appraisal will be based on an "as-is" valuation and will follow a reasonable valuation method that addresses the direct sales comparison, income, and cost approaches to market value, reconciles those approaches, and explains the elimination of each approach not used. Appraisals are generally updated every 12 months or sooner if we have identified possible further deterioration in value. Prior to receiving the updated appraisal, we will establish a specific reserve for any estimated deterioration, based upon our assessment of market conditions, adjusted for estimated costs to sell and other identified costs. If the NRV is greater than the loan amount, then no impairment loss exists. If the NRV is less than the loan amount, the shortfall is recognized by a specific reserve. If the borrower fails to pledge additional collateral in the ninety day period, a charge-off equal to the difference between the loan carrying value and NRV will occur. In certain circumstances, however, a direct charge-off may be taken at the time that the NRV calculation reveals a shortfall. All impaired loans are evaluated based on the criteria stated above on a quarterly basis and any change in the reserve requirements are recorded in the period identified. All partially charged-off loans remain on nonaccrual status until they are brought current as to both principal and interest and have at least nine months of payment history and future collectability of principal and interest is assured.

Impaired loans at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are set forth in the following tables.

June 30, 2013	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
	(Amounts in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and Industrial	$	75	$	142	$	—
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		187		661		—
Commercial		12,895		12,895		—
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		718		718		—
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		12,144		15,110		—
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		8,412		8,839		—
Residential – Multifamily		1,467		1,659		—
Consumer		252		252		—
		36,150		40,276		—

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and Industrial		555		555		64
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		658		1,399		93
Commercial		1,947		2,005		90
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		5,846		5,875		205
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		36,766		36,815		2,480
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		3,450		3,671		343
Residential – Multifamily		373		373		6
Consumer		—		—		—
		49,595		50,693		3,281

Total:
Commercial and Industrial		630		697		64
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		845		2,060		93
Commercial		14,842		14,900		90
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		6,564		6,593		205
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		48,910		51,925		2,480
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		11,862		12,510		343
Residential – Multifamily		1,840		2,032		6
Consumer		252		252		—
	$	85,745	$	90,969	$	3,281

December 31, 2012	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
	(Amounts in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and Industrial	$	248	$	315	$	—
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		800		2,126		—
Commercial		12,891		12,891		—
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		876		1,031		—
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		19,228		22,027		—
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		8,945		9,372		—
Residential – Multifamily		2,838		2,838		—
Consumer		188		188		—
		46,014		50,788		—

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and Industrial		500		500		10
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		187		661		24
Commercial		1,988		2,045		96
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		5,718		5,748		216
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		29,187		29,187		1,053
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		3,605		4,290		301
Residential – Multifamily		377		377		6
Consumer		—		—		—
		41,562		42,808		1,706

Total:
Commercial and Industrial		748		815		10
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		987		2,787		24
Commercial		14,879		14,936		96
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		6,594		6,779		216
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		48,415		51,214		1,053
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		12,550		13,662		301
Residential – Multifamily		3,215		3,215		6
Consumer		188		188		—
	$	87,576	$	93,596	$	1,706

The following tables present by loan portfolio class, the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013				2012
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	688	$	13	$	856	$	11
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		736		—		3,658		45
Commercial		14,864		51		8,130		3
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		6,550		131		8,547		136
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		49,258		874		51,825		1,007
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		11,890		136		11,273		180
Residential – Multifamily		2,631		60		3,614		54
Consumer		252		3		210		2
Total	$	86,869	$	1,268	$	88,113	$	1,438

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013				2012
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	631	$	4	$	730	$	11
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		769		—		5,180		27
Commercial		14,856		26		12,296		—
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		6,564		69		8,087		103
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		49,113		484		48,630		565
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		11,877		69		11,307		121
Residential – Multifamily		2,215		49		3,631		1
Consumer		252		1		190		1
Total	$	86,277	$	702	$	90,051	$	829

Troubled debt restructurings: Periodically management evaluates our loans in order to determine the appropriate risk rating, interest accrual status and potential classification as a TDR, some of which are performing and accruing interest. A TDR is a loan on which we have granted a concession due to a borrower’s financial difficulty. These are concessions that would not otherwise be considered. The terms of these modified loans may include extension of maturity, renewals, changes in interest rate, additional collateral requirements or infusion of additional capital into the project by the borrower to reduce debt or to support future debt service. On construction and land development loans we may modify the loan as a result of delays or other project issues such as slower than anticipated sell-outs, insufficient leasing activity and/or a decline in the value of the underlying collateral securing the loan. Management believes that working with a borrower to restructure a loan provides us with a better likelihood of collecting our loan. It is our policy not to renegotiate the terms of a commercial loan simply because of a delinquency status. However, we will use our Troubled Debt Restructuring Program to work with delinquent borrowers when the delinquency is temporary. We consider all loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring to be impaired.

At the time a loan is modified in a TDR, we consider the following factors to determine whether the loan should accrue interest:

·	Whether there is a period of current payment history under the current terms, typically 6 months;

·	Whether the loan is current at the time of restructuring; and

·	Whether we expect the loan to continue to perform under the restructured terms with a debt coverage ratio that complies with the Bank’s credit underwriting policy of 1.25 times debt service.

We also review the financial performance of the borrower over the past year to be reasonably assured of repayment and performance according to the modified terms. This review consists of an analysis of the borrower’s historical results; the borrower’s projected results over the next four quarters; current financial information of the borrower and any guarantors. The projected repayment source needs to be reliable, verifiable, quantifiable and sustainable. In addition, all TDRs are reviewed quarterly to determine the amount of any impairment.

At the time of restructuring, the amount of the loan principal for which we are not reasonably assured of repayment is charged-off, but not forgiven.

A borrower with a restructured loan must make a minimum of six consecutive monthly payments at the restructured level and be current as to both interest and principal to be on accrual status.

Performing TDRs (not reported as non-accrual loans) totaled $39.5 million and $40.0 million with related allowances of $1.4 million and $1.4 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Non-performing TDRs totaled $23.6 million and $27.1 million with related allowances of $0 and $8,000 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. All TDRs are classified as impaired loans and are included in the impaired loan disclosures above.

The following tables detail loans modified during the six months and three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, including the number of modifications, the recorded investment both pre- and post-modification and the nature of the modifications made.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013						2012
	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Commercial and Industrial		—	$	—	$	—		2	$	575	$	575
Construction:
Residential		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial		—		—		—		1		408		408
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		—		—		—		1		3,148		3,148
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		—		—		—		2		2,897		2,897
Residential – 1-4 Family		—		—		—		2		3,961		3,961
Residential – Multifamily		—		—		—		1		373		373
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		—	$	—	$	—		9	$	11,362	$	11,362

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013						2012
	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Commercial and Industrial		—	$	—	$	—		2	$	575	$	575
Construction:
Residential		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial		—		—		—		1		408		408
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		—		—		—		1		3,148		3,148
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		—		—		—		2		2,897		2,897
Residential – 1-4 Family		—		—		—		2		3,961		3,961
Residential – Multifamily		—		—		—		1		373		373
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		—	$	—	$	—		9	$	11,362	$	11,362

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013								2012
	Extension		Period of Interest Only		Interest Rate Reduction		Total		Extension		Period of Interest Only		Interest Rate Reduction		Total
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Commercial and Industrial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	500	$	—	$	75	$	575
Construction:
Residential		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial		—		—		—		—		—		—		408		408
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		—		—		—		—		3,148		—		—		3,148
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		—		—		—		—		—		—		2,897		2,897
Residential – 1-4 Family		—		—		—		—		919		—		3,042		3,961
Residential – Multifamily		—		—		—		—		—		373		—		373
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,567	$	373	$	6,422	$	11,362

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013								2012
	Extension		Period of Interest Only		Interest Rate Reduction		Total		Extension		Period of Interest Only		Interest Rate Reduction		Total
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Commercial and Industrial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	500	$	—	$	75	$	575
Construction:
Residential		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial		—		—		—		—		—		—		408		408
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		—		—		—		—		3,148		—		—		3,148
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		—		—		—		—		—		—		2,897		2,897
Residential – 1-4 Family		—		—		—		—		919		—		3,042		3,961
Residential – Multifamily		—		—		—		—		—		373		—		373
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,567	$	373	$	6,422	$	11,362

The following tables show loans that were modified and deemed TDRs that subsequently defaulted during the six months and three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
	(Amounts in thousands)

Commercial and Industrial	—	$	—	1	$	75
Real Estate Construction:
Residential	1		187	—		—
Commercial	—		—	2		920
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied	—		—	—		—
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied	—		—	1		1,217
Residential – 1-4 Family	—		—	1		209
Residential – Multifamily	—		—	1		1,971
Consumer	—		—	—		—
Total	1	$	187	6	$	4,392

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
	(Amounts in thousands)

Commercial and Industrial	—	$	—	1	$	75
Real Estate Construction:
Residential	—		—	—		—
Commercial	—		—	2		920
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied	—		—	—		—
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied	—		—	—		—
Residential – 1-4 Family	—		—	—		—
Residential – Multifamily	—		—	—		—
Consumer	—		—	—		—
Total	—	$	—	3	$	995

Some loan modifications classified as TDRs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest, as modified, and result in potential incremental losses. These potential incremental losses have been factored into our overall allowance for loan losses estimate. The level of any re-defaults will likely be affected by future economic conditions. Once a loan becomes a TDR, it will continue to be reported as a TDR until it is repaid in full, foreclosed, sold or it meets the criteria to be removed from TDR status.

Credit Quality Indicators: As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company's loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to the risk grades of loans, the level of classified loans, net charge-offs, nonperforming loans (see details above) and the general economic conditions in the region.

The Company utilizes a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each of its loans. Loans are graded on a scale of 1 to 7. Grades 1 through 4 are considered “Pass”. A description of the general characteristics of the seven risk grades is as follows:

1.	Good: Borrower exhibits the strongest overall financial condition and represents the most creditworthy profile.

2.	Satisfactory (A): Borrower reflects a well-balanced financial condition, demonstrates a high level of creditworthiness and typically will have a strong banking relationship with the Bank.

3.	Satisfactory (B): Borrower exhibits a balanced financial condition and does not expose the Bank to more than a normal or average overall amount of risk. Loans are considered fully collectable.

4.	Watch List: Borrower reflects a fair financial condition, but there exists an overall greater than average risk. Risk is deemed acceptable by virtue of increased monitoring and control over borrowings. Probability of timely repayment is present.

Other Assets Especially Mentioned (OAEM): Financial condition is such that assets in this category have a potential weakness or pose unwarranted financial risk to the Bank even though the asset value is not currently impaired. The asset does not currently warrant adverse classification but if not corrected could weaken and could create future increased risk exposure. Includes loans which require an increased degree of monitoring or servicing as a result of internal or external changes.

Substandard: This classification represents more severe cases of #5 (OAEM) characteristics that require increased monitoring. Assets are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral. Asset has a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that impairs the ability to repay debt and jeopardizes the timely liquidation or realization of the collateral at the asset’s net book value.

Doubtful: Assets which have all the weaknesses inherent in those assets classified #6 (Substandard) but the risks are more severe relative to financial deterioration in capital and/or asset value; accounting/evaluation techniques may be questionable and the overall possibility for collection in full is highly improbable. Borrowers in this category require constant monitoring, are considered work-out loans and present the potential for future loss to the Bank.

An analysis of the credit risk profile by internally assigned grades as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows:

At June 30, 2013	Pass		OAEM		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	21,985	$	1,941	$	902	$	—	$	24,828
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		6,881		—		845		—		7,726
Commercial		26,142		—		21,334		—		47,476
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		149,932		1,375		5,685		—		156,992
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		176,086		11,925		34,685		—		222,696
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		133,577		2,240		10,889		—		146,706
Residential – Multifamily		17,144		1,080		1,840		—		20,064
Consumer		17,284		—		252		—		17,536
Total	$	549,031	$	18,561	$	76,432	$	—	$	644,024

At December 31, 2012	Pass		OAEM		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	18,926	$	2,183	$	816	$	—	$	21,925
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		6,345		—		986		—		7,331
Commercial		20,097		—		21,778		—		41,875
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		150,990		1,121		5,505		—		157,616
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		173,606		11,399		36,726		—		221,731
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		126,167		2,263		11,734		—		140,164
Residential – Multifamily		16,863		1,103		3,215		—		21,181
Consumer		17,701		—		188		—		17,889
Total	$	530,695	$	18,069	$	80,948	$	—	$	629,712

NOTE 5. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense, which represents management's best estimate of probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The Company's allowance for loan loss methodology includes allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 310, "Receivables" and allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 450, "Contingencies." Accordingly, the methodology is based on historical loss experience by type of credit and internal risk grade, specific homogeneous risk pools and specific loss allocations, with adjustments for current events and conditions. The Company's process for determining the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses is designed to account for credit deterioration as it occurs. The provision for loan losses reflects loan quality trends, including the levels of, and trends related to, nonaccrual loans, past due loans, potential problem loans, criticized loans and net charge-offs or recoveries, among other factors. The provision for possible loan losses also reflects the totality of actions taken on all loans for a particular period. In other words, the amount of the provision reflects not only the necessary increases in the allowance for loan losses related to newly identified criticized loans, but it also reflects actions taken related to other loans including, among other things, any necessary increases or decreases in required allowances for specific loans or loan pools.

The level of the allowance reflects management's continuing evaluation of industry concentrations, specific credit risks, loan loss experience, current loan portfolio quality, present economic, political and regulatory conditions and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. Portions of the allowance may be allocated for specific credits; however, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in management's judgment, should be charged off. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond the Company’s control, including, among other things, the performance of the Company's loan portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates and the view of the regulatory authorities toward loan classifications.

The allowances established for probable losses on specific loans are based on a regular analysis and evaluation of problem loans. Loans are classified based on an internal credit risk grading process that evaluates, among other things: (i) the obligor's ability to repay; (ii) the underlying collateral, if any; and (iii) the economic environment and industry in which the borrower operates. This analysis is performed at the relationship manager level for all commercial loans. When a loan has a grade of 6 or higher, the loan is analyzed to determine whether the loan is impaired and, if impaired, whether there is a need to specifically allocate a portion of the allowance for loan losses to the loan. Specific valuation allowances are determined by analyzing the borrower's ability to repay amounts owed, any collateral deficiencies, the relative risk grade of the loan and economic conditions affecting the borrower's industry, among other things.

Historical valuation allowances are calculated based on the historical loss experience of specific types of loans. The Company calculates historical loss ratios for pools of similar loans with similar characteristics based on the proportion of actual charge-offs experienced to the total population of loans in the pool. The historical loss ratios are periodically updated based on actual charge-off experience. A historical valuation allowance is established for each pool of similar loans based upon the product of the historical loss ratio and the total dollar amount of the loans in the pool. The Company's pools of similar loans include similarly risk-graded groups of commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, consumer real estate loans and consumer and other loans.

General valuation allowances are based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Company. In general, such valuation allowances are determined by evaluating, among other things: (i) the experience, ability and effectiveness of the Bank's lending management and staff; (ii) the effectiveness of the Bank's loan policies, procedures and internal controls; (iii)

changes in asset quality; (iv) changes in loan portfolio volume; (v) the composition and concentrations of credit; (vi) the impact of competition on loan structuring and pricing; (vii) the effectiveness of the internal loan review function; (viii) the impact of environmental risks on portfolio risks; and (ix) the impact of rising interest rates on portfolio risk. Management evaluates the degree of risk that each one of these components has on the quality of the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis. Each component is determined to have either a high, high-moderate, moderate, low-moderate or low degree of risk. The results are then input into a "general allocation matrix" to determine an appropriate general valuation allowance.

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the six month and three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

Allowance for Loan Losses:	For the six months ended June 30, 2013
	Beginning Balance		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provisions			Ending Balance
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	470	$	—		$	—	$	105		$	575
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		845		—			—		(272	)		573
Commercial		1,115		—			—		271			1,386
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		4,095		—			1		272			4,368
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		7,379		—			—		1,192			8,571
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		4,384		(267	)		197		231			4,545
Residential – Multifamily		312		—			—		4			316
Consumer		336		—			—		(4	)		332
Unallocated		—		—			—		201			201
Total	$	18,936	$	(267	)	$	198	$	2,000		$	20,867

Allowance for Loan Losses:	For the six months ended June 30, 2012
	Beginning Balance		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provisions			Ending Balance
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	451	$	(66	)	$	—	$	109		$	494
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		2,613		(1,289	)		37		(71	)		1,290
Commercial		1,971		(311	)		—		(179	)		1,481
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		2,714		(748	)		—		1,555			3,521
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		6,742		(2,938	)		—		2,464			6,268
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		4,190		(350	)		403		165			4,408
Residential – Multifamily		278		—			—		(10	)		268
Consumer		148		(36	)		—		66			178
Unallocated		216		—			—		201			417
Total	$	19,323	$	(5,738	)	$	440	$	4,300		$	18,325

Allowance for Loan Losses:	For the three months ended June 30, 2013
	Beginning Balance		Charge-offs		Recoveries		Provisions			Ending Balance
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	446	$	—	$	—	$	129		$	575
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		443		—		—		130			573
Commercial		1,291		—		—		95			1,386
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		4,388		—		1		(21	)		4,368
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		7,413		—		—		1,158			8,571
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		4,504		—		5		36			4,545
Residential – Multifamily		326		—		—		(10	)		316
Consumer		334		—		—		(2	)		332
Unallocated		716		—		—		(515	)		201
Total	$	19,861	$	—	$	6	$	1,000		$	20,867

Allowance for Loan Losses:	For the three months ended June 30, 2012
	Beginning Balance		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provisions			Ending Balance
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	441	$	(66	)	$	—	$	119		$	494
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		1,923		(437	)		—		(196	)		1,290
Commercial		1,513		(311	)		—		279			1,481
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		2,833		2,108			—		(1,420	)		3,521
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		5,996		(2,865	)		—		3,137			6,268
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		4,181		(78	)		403		(98	)		4,408
Residential – Multifamily		254		—			—		14			268
Consumer		182		(36	)		—		32			178
Unallocated		234		—			—		183			417
Total	$	17,557	$	(1,685	)	$	403	$	2,050		$	18,325

Allowance for Loan Losses, at June 30, 2013	Individually evaluated for impairment		Collectively evaluated for impairment		Total
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	64	$	511	$	575
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		93		480		573
Commercial		90		1,296		1,386
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		205		4,163		4,368
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		2,480		6,091		8,571
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		343		4,202		4,545
Residential – Multifamily		6		310		316
Consumer		—		332		332
Unallocated		—		201		201
Total	$	3,281	$	17,586	$	20,867

Allowance for Loan Losses, at December 31, 2012	Individually evaluated for impairment		Collectively evaluated for impairment		Total
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	10	$	460	$	470
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		24		821		845
Commercial		96		1,019		1,115
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		216		3,879		4,095
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		1,053		6,326		7,379
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		301		4,083		4,384
Residential – Multifamily		6		306		312
Consumer		—		336		336
Unallocated		—		—		—
Total	$	1,706	$	17,230	$	18,936

Loans, at June 30, 2013:	Individually evaluated for impairment		Collectively evaluated for impairment		Total
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	630	$	24,198	$	24,828
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		845		6,881		7,726
Commercial		14,842		32,634		47,476
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		6,564		150,428		156,992
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		48,910		173,786		222,696
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		11,862		134,844		146,706
Residential – Multifamily		1,840		18,224		20,064
Consumer		252		17,284		17,536
Total	$	85,745	$	558,279	$	644,024

Loans, at December 31, 2012:	Individually evaluated for impairment		Collectively evaluated for impairment		Total
	(Amounts in thousands)
Commercial and Industrial	$	748	$	21,177	$	21,925
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		987		6,344		7,331
Commercial		14,879		26,996		41,875
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		6,594		151,022		157,616
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		48,415		173,316		221,731
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		12,550		127,614		140,164
Residential – Multifamily		3,215		17,966		21,181
Consumer		188		17,701		17,889
Total	$	87,576	$	542,136	$	629,712

NOTE 6. REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements of federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company and the Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined).

	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be Well- Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
Parke Bancorp, Inc.	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio

As of June 30, 2013
(Amounts in thousands except ratios)

Total Risk Based Capital	$	108,089		16.48%	$	52,458		8%		N/A		N/A
(to Risk Weighted Assets)

Tier 1 Capital	$	99,736		15.21%	$	26,229		4%		N/A		N/A
(to Risk Weighted Assets)

Tier 1 Capital	$	99,736		13.48%	$	29,602		4%		N/A		N/A
(to Average Assets)

	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be Well- Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
Parke Bancorp, Inc.	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio

As of December 31, 2012
(Amounts in thousands except ratios)

Total Risk Based Capital	$	105,640		16.25%	$	51,998		8%		N/A		N/A
(to Risk Weighted Assets)

Tier 1 Capital	$	97,382		14.98%	$	25,999		4%		N/A		N/A
(to Risk Weighted Assets)

Tier 1 Capital	$	97,382		12.60%	$	30,917		4%		N/A		N/A
(to Average Assets)

	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be Well- Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
Parke Bank	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio


As of June 30, 2013
(Amounts in thousands except ratios)

Total Risk Based Capital	$	107,912		16.46%	$	52,458		8%	$	65,573		10%
(to Risk Weighted Assets)

Tier 1 Capital	$	99,559		15.18%	$	26,229		4%	$	39,344		6%
(to Risk Weighted Assets)

Tier 1 Capital	$	99,559		13.45%	$	29,602		4%	$	37,002		5%
(to Average Assets)

	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be Well- Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
Parke Bank	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio


As of December 31, 2012
(Amounts in thousands except ratios)

Total Risk Based Capital	$	105,714		16.26%	$	51,998		8%	$	64,998		10%
(to Risk Weighted Assets)

Tier 1 Capital	$	97,456		14.99%	$	25,999		4%	$	38,999		6%
(to Risk Weighted Assets)

Tier 1 Capital	$	97,456		12.61%	$	30,917		4%	$	38,646		5%
(to Average Assets)

On October 3, 2008 Congress passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA), which provides the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury with broad authority to implement certain actions to help restore stability and liquidity to the U.S. markets. One of the provisions resulting from the EESA was the Treasury Capital Purchase Program (CPP) which provided for the direct equity investment of perpetual preferred stock by the U.S. Treasury in qualified financial institutions. This program was voluntary and required an institution to comply with several restrictions and provisions, including limits on executive compensation, stock redemptions, and declaration of dividends. The perpetual preferred stock has a dividend rate of 5% per year until the fifth anniversary of the Treasury investment and a dividend rate of 9%, thereafter. The CPP also required the Treasury to receive a warrant to purchase shares of common stock equal to 15% of the capital invested by the U.S. Treasury. The Company received an investment in perpetual preferred stock of $16,288,000 on January 30, 2009. These proceeds were allocated between the preferred stock and the warrant based on relative fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 470-20, “Debt with Conversion and Other Options.” The allocation of proceeds resulted in a discount on the preferred stock that is being accreted over five years. The Company issued a warrant to purchase 329,757 shares of common stock to the U.S. Treasury and $930,000 of those proceeds was allocated to the warrant. The warrant was accounted for as equity securities. The warrant had a contractual life of 10 years and an exercise price of $6.12 per share of common stock. In November of 2012, the U.S. Treasury held an auction and sold its investment in the preferred stock to institutional investors. Restrictions related to the CPP have been lifted. In May of 2013, the U.S. Treasury held an auction to sell the warrant and the Company was the successful bidder thereby redeeming the outstanding warrant from the U.S. Treasury at a cost of $1.7 million.

NOTE 7. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of the following at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(Amounts in thousands)
Securities
Non-credit unrealized losses on securities with OTTI	$	(484	)	$	(499	)
Unrealized losses on securities without OTTI		(803	)		(499	)
Minimum pension liability		(144	)		(244	)
Tax impact		573			497
Other comprehensive income	$	(858	)	$	(745	)

NOTE 8. FAIR VALUE

Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 of FASB ASC, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company's various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions. In accordance with this guidance, the Company groups its assets and liabilities carried at fair value in three levels as follows:

Level 1 Input:

1)	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Inputs:

1) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets.

2) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

3)	Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for the term of the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds or volatilities) or “market corroborated inputs.”

Level 3 Inputs:

1)	Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no market activity) and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

2)	These assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:

The following is a description of the Company’s valuation methodologies for assets carried at fair value. These methods may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes that its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting measurement date.

Investment Securities Available for Sale:

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified in Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Securities in Level 1 are exchange-traded equities. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are provided by independent third-party valuations services. These valuations services estimate fair values using pricing models and other accepted valuation methodologies, such as quotes for similar securities and observable yield curves and spreads. As part of the Company’s overall valuation process, management evaluates these third-party methodologies to ensure that they are representative of exit prices in the Company’s principal markets. Securities in Level 2 include U.S. Government agencies, mortgage-backed securities, state and municipal securities and trust preferred securities.

Securities in Level 3 include thinly-traded and collateralized debt obligations. With the assistance of competent third-party valuation specialists, the Company utilized the following methodology to determine the fair value:

Cash flows were developed based on the estimated speeds at which the TruPS are expected to prepay (a range of 1% to 2%), the estimated rates at which the TruPS are expected to defer payments, the estimated rates at which the TruPS are expected to default (a range of 0.57% to 0.66%), and the severity of the losses on securities which default (95%). TruPS generally allow for prepayment by the issuer without a prepayment penalty any time after five years. Due to the lack of new TruPS and the relatively poor conditions of the financial institution industry, a relatively modest rate of prepayment was assumed going forward. Estimates for CDRs are based on the payment characteristics of the TruPS themselves (e.g. current, deferred, or defaulted) as well as the financial condition of the TruPS issuers in the pool. Estimates for the near-term rates of deferral and CDR are based on key financial ratios relating to the financial institutions’ capitalization, asset quality, profitability and liquidity. Finally, we consider whether or not the financial institution has received TARP funding, and if it has, the amount. Longer-term rates of deferral and defaults are based on historical averages. The fair value of each bond was assessed by discounting its projected cash flows by a discount rate. The discount rates were based on the yields of publicly traded TruPS and preferred stock issued by comparably rated banks (3 month LIBOR plus a spread of 400 to 959 basis points).

The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Financial Assets	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(Amounts in thousands)
Securities Available for Sale

As of June 30, 2013
U.S. Government sponsored entities	$	—	$	7	$	—	$	7
Corporate debt obligations		—		507		—		507
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		12,248		—		12,248
Collateralized mortgage-backed securities				738		—		738
Collateralized debt obligations		—		—		4,031		4,031
Total	$	—	$	13,500	$	4,031	$	17,531

As of December 31, 2012
U.S. Government sponsored entities	$	—	$	7	$	—	$	7
Corporate debt obligations		—		1,524		—		1,524
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		12,899		—		12,899
Collateralized mortgage-backed securities				968		6		974
Collateralized debt obligations		—		—		3,936		3,936
Total	$	—	$	15,398	$	3,942	$	19,340

For the six months ending June 30, 2013, there were no transfers between the levels within the fair value hierarchy.

The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows for the six months ending June 30:

	Securities Available for Sale
	2013		2012
	(Amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance at January 1,	$	3,942	$	4,122
Total net losses included in:
Net loss		—		—
Other comprehensive income (loss)		89		(88	)
Settlements		—		—
Net transfers into Level 3		—		—
Ending balance	$	4,031	$	4,034

Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis:

Certain assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).

Financial Assets	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(Amounts in thousands)
As of June 30, 2013
Collateral dependent impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	55,021	$	55,021
OREO		—		—		23,669		23,669

As of December 31, 2012
Collateral dependent impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	56,620	$	56,620
OREO		—		—		26,057		26,057

Collateral dependent impaired loans, which are measured in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310 “Receivables”, for impairment, had a carrying amount of $55.0 million and $56.6 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 respectively, with a valuation allowance of $2.2 million and $547 thousand at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The valuation allowance for collateral dependent impaired loans is included in the allowance for loan losses on the balance sheet. All collateral dependent impaired loans have an independent third-party full appraisal to determine the NRV based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, less cost to sell (a range of 5% to 10%) and other costs, such as unpaid real estate taxes, that have been identified, or the present value of discounted cash flows in the case of certain impaired loans that are not collateral dependent. The appraisal will be based on an "as-is" valuation and will follow a reasonable valuation method that addresses the direct sales comparison, income, and cost approaches to market value, reconciles those approaches, and explains the elimination of each approach not used. Appraisals are updated every 12 months or sooner if we have identified possible further deterioration in value.

OREO consists of commercial real estate properties which are recorded at fair value based upon current appraised value less estimated disposition costs, which is adjusted based upon management’s review and changes in market conditions (Level 3 inputs). Properties are reappraised annually.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company discloses estimated fair values for its significant financial instruments in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 825, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of other financial assets and liabilities are discussed below.

For certain financial assets and liabilities, carrying value approximates fair value due to the nature of the financial instrument. These instruments include cash and cash equivalents, restricted stock, accrued interest receivable, demand and other non-maturity deposits and accrued interest payable.

The Company used the following methods and assumptions in estimating the fair value of the following financial instruments:

Investment Securities: Fair value of securities available for sale is described above. Fair value of held to maturity securities is based upon quoted market prices (Level 2 inputs).

Loans (other than impaired): Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, residential mortgage and other consumer. Each loan category is further segmented into groups by fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and non-performing categories. The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through their estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in each group of loans (Level 2 inputs). The estimate of maturity is based on contractual maturities for loans within each group, or on the Company’s historical experience with repayments for each loan classification, modified as required by an estimate of the effect of current economic conditions.

Deposits: The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows, where the discount rate is estimated using the market rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities (Level 2 inputs).

Borrowings: The fair values of FHLB borrowings, other borrowed funds and subordinated debt are based on the discounted value of estimated cash flows. The discounted rate is estimated using market rates currently offered for similar advances or borrowings (Level 2 inputs).

Bank premises and equipment, customer relationships, deposit base and other information required to compute the Company’s aggregate fair value are not included in the above information. Accordingly, the above fair values are not intended to represent the aggregate fair value of the Company.

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values for financial instruments at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	Level In	June 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Fair Value	Carrying		Fair			Carrying		Fair
	Hierarchy	Value		Value			Value		Value
	(Amounts in thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Level 1	$	37,089	$	37,089		$	76,866	$	76,866
Investment securities AFS	(1)		17,531		17,531			19,340		19,340
Investment securities HTM	Level 2		2,084		2,139			2,066		2,239
Restricted stock	Level 2		2,047		2,047			2,223		2,223
Loans held for sale	Level 2		698		698			495		495
Loans, net	(2)		623,157		631,434			610,776		632,723
Accrued interest receivable	Level 2		2,762		2,762			2,727		2,727

Financial Liabilities:
Demand and savings deposits	Level 2	$	370,454	$	370,454		$	367,158	$	367,158
Time deposits	Level 2		239,065		240,893			270,049		271,786
Borrowings	Level 2		38,768		34,930			43,851		42,849
Accrued interest payable	Level 2		475		475			537		537

(1) See the recurring fair value table above.

(2) For non-impaired loans, Level 2; for impaired loans, Level 3.

NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES

	For the six months ended June 30,						For the three months ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Amount in thousands)
Income Taxes
Pre-tax Income		$	7,182		$	5,413		$	3,568		$	2,247
Income Tax Expense			2,810			1,529			1,397			257

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a net tax expense of $2.8 million compared to a net tax expense of $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a net tax expense of $1.4 million compared to a net tax expense of $257 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Deferred federal and state tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The lower level of income tax expense in the 2012 periods as compared to the comparable periods in 2013 is due to lower earnings and the change to an alternative tax methodology for bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) income whereby it is treated on a tax free basis.

NOTE 10. EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”)

The following tables set forth the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the six month and three month periods ending June 30, 2013 and 2012.

	For the six months ended June 30,				For the three months ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(Amounts in thousands except share data)				(Amoutns in thousands except share data)
Basic earnings per common share
Net income available to common shareholders	$	3,615	$	3,132		1,732		1,596
Average common shares outstanding		5,944,915		5,916,502		5,962,623		5,917,118
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.61	$	0.53		0.29		0.27

Diluted earnings per common share
Net income available to common shareholders	$	3,615	$	3,132		1,732		1,596
Average common shares outstanding		5,944,915		5,916,502		5,962,623		5,917,118
Dilutive potential common shares		—		—		1,021		—
Total diluted average common shares outstanding		5,944,915		5,916,502		5,963,644		5,917,118
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.61	$	0.53		0.29		0.27

For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, options to purchase 356,143 shares and 343,035 shares, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options' common stock equivalents were antidilutive.

In May of 2013 the Company paid a 10% common stock dividend to shareholders. All weighted share information has been retroactively adjusted to give effect to this stock dividend for the periods presented.

NOTE 11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Accounting guidance establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Accordingly, Management has evaluated subsequent events after June 30, 2013 through the date the financial statements were issued and determined that no subsequent events warranted recognition in or disclosure in the interim financial statements.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

The Company may from time to time make written or oral "forward-looking statements" including statements contained in this Report and in other communications by the Company which are made in good faith pursuant to the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements, such as statements of the Company's plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions, involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various important factors (some of which are beyond the Company's control). The following factors, among others, could cause the Company's financial performance to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts operations; the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the impact of the Bank’s compliance with the Consent Orders entered into with the FDIC and the Department, inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services of the Company and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors' products and services; the impact of changes in financial services laws and regulations (including laws concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance); technological changes; acquisitions; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and the success of the Company at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

The Company cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive. The Company also cautions readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management's analysis only as of the date on which they are given. The Company is not obligated to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after any such date.

General

The Company's results of operations are dependent primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest expense paid on its interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. The Company also generates non-interest income such as service charges, gains from the sale of loans, earnings from BOLI, loan exit fees and other fees. The Company's non-interest expenses primarily consist of employee compensation and benefits, occupancy expenses, marketing expenses, data processing costs and other operating expenses. The Company is also subject to losses in its loan portfolio if borrowers fail to meet their obligations. The Company's results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory agencies.

The Company is intently focused on managing its non-performing assets. The deterioration of the local real estate market and the continued high levels of unemployment have had a significant negative impact on the credit quality of our loan portfolio. Management has allocated significant resources to resolve these issues, either through foreclosure or working with borrowers to bring the loans current. New processes have been implemented to identify and monitor impaired loans. New appraisals of the collateral securing impaired loans have been obtained to identify any potential exposure. The lengthy process of foreclosure has had a negative impact on earnings due to higher levels of legal fees.

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

At June 30, 2013, the Company’s total assets decreased to $738.4 million from $770.5 million at December 31, 2012, a decrease of $32.1 million or 4.2%. The decrease was due to a decrease in cash.

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $39.8 million to $37.1 million at June 30, 2013 from $76.9 million at December 31, 2012 due to a planned payoff of certificates of deposit.

Total investment securities decreased to $19.6 million at June 30, 2013 ($17.5 million classified as available for sale or 89.4%) from $21.4 million at December 31, 2012, a decrease of $1.8 million or 8.4% due to principal payments on mortgage-backed securities.

Management evaluates the investment portfolio for OTTI on a quarterly basis. Factors considered in the analysis include, but are not limited to, whether an adverse change in cash flows has occurred, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, whether the Company intends to sell, or will more likely than not be required to sell, the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, credit rating downgrades, the percentage of performing collateral that would need to default or defer to cause a break in yield or a temporary interest shortfall, and management’s assessment of the financial condition of the underlying issuers. For the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company did not recognize any credit-related OTTI charges.

Total gross loans increased to $644.0 million at June 30, 2013 from $629.7 million at December 31, 2012, an increase of $14.3 million or 2.3%.

Delinquent loans totaled $50.9 million or 7.9% of total loans at June 30, 2013, a decrease of $5.1 million from December 31, 2012. Delinquent loan balances by number of days delinquent were: 30 to 89 days --- $5.6 million; 90 days and greater not accruing interest --- $45.3 million.

At June 30, 2013, the Company had $45.3 million in nonaccrual loans or 7.0% of total loans, a decrease from $47.5 million or 7.6% of total loans at December 31, 2012. The three largest relationships in nonperforming loans are a $7.7 million retail center construction loan, a $7.5 residential and commercial development loan, and a $6.4 million retail center construction loan.

The composition of nonaccrual loans as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was as follows:

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(Amounts in thousands except ratios)
Commercial and Industrial	$	130		$	248
Real Estate Construction:
Residential		845			799
Commercial		12,961			12,958
Real Estate Mortgage:
Commercial – Owner Occupied		1,058			1,218
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied		19,118			19,228
Residential – 1 to 4 Family		9,421			10,072
Residential – Multifamily		1,467			2,838
Consumer		252			188
Total	$	45,252		$	47,549

Nonperforming loans to total loans		7.0	%		7.6	%

At June 30, 2013, the Company’s allowance for loan losses was $20.9 million, an increase of $1.9 million from December 31, 2012. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans increased to 3.2% at June 30, 2013 from 3.0% at December 31, 2012. During the six month period ended June 30, 2013, the Company charged-off $69,000 in loans, net of recoveries. Specific allowances for loan losses have been established in the amount of $3.3 million on impaired loans totaling $85.7 million at June 30, 2013. We have provided for all losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. There can be no assurance, however, that further additions to the allowance will not be required in future periods.

The negative economic trends that began in 2008, including the weakness in the residential and commercial real estate markets and high levels of unemployment, have had a significant impact on the credit quality of our loan portfolio. We are aggressively managing all loan relationships by enhancing our credit monitoring and tracking systems. New processes have been established to manage delinquencies. We are working closely with borrowers to resolve these non-performing loans. Updated appraisals are being obtained, where appropriate, to ensure that collateral values are sufficient to cover outstanding loan balances, and we are establishing specific reserves for any potential shortfall. With all these measures in place our nonperforming assets have decreased from 9.6% of total assets at December 31, 2012 to 9.3% at June 30, 2013. See Note 4 – Loans for additional information. Cash flow-dependent commercial real estate properties are being visited to inspect current tenant lease status. Where necessary, we will apply our loan work-out experience to protect our collateral position.

OREO at June 30, 2013 was $23.7 million, compared to $26.1 million at December 31, 2012 and $26.7 million at June 30, 2012, the largest being a condominium development valued at $12.7 million. This property was sold in 2010 but does not qualify for a sales treatment under GAAP.

An analysis of OREO activity is as follow:

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
	(Amounts in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	26,057		$	19,410
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans		1,160			8,981
Sales of real estate		(3,157	)		(1,246	)
Loss on sale of real estate		(50	)		(348	)
Write-down of real estate carrying values		(404	)		(277	)
Capitalized improvements to real estate		63			207
Balance at end of period	$	23,669		$	26,727

At June 30, 2013, the Bank’s total deposits decreased to $609.5 million from $637.2 million at December 31, 2012, a decrease of $27.7 million or 4.3%. The decrease was the result of a planned runoff of higher priced certificates of deposits.

At June 30, 2013, total shareholders’ equity increased to $85.9 million from $83.6 million at December 31, 2012, an increase of $2.3 million, or 2.7% due to the retention of earnings from the period. In addition, during the second quarter, the Company redeemed the outstanding warrant that was issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with TARP, reducing shareholders’ equity by $1.7 million.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

General: Net income available to common shareholders for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $3.6 million, compared to $3.1 million for the same period in 2012. The change was impacted by the following:

Interest Income: Interest income decreased $1.2 million, or 6.5%, to $18.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, from $19.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease is attributable to lower yield on loans. Average loans for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 were $634.1 million compared to $617.4 million for the same period last year. The average yield on loans was 5.66% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 6.15% for the same period in 2012.

Interest Expense: Interest expense decreased $844,000 to $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, from $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease is primarily attributable to a lower average cost of deposits as the Bank has been able to re-price deposits due to the current, historically low, interest rate environment and the drop in the average deposit balances. The average rate paid on deposits for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 was 0.90% compared to 1.13% for the same period last year.

Net Interest Income: Net interest income decreased $419,000 to $15.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same period last year. We experienced an increase in our net interest rate spread of seven basis points, to 4.18% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, from 4.11% for the same period last year. Our net interest margin increased six basis points to 4.29% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, from 4.23% for the same period last year.

Provision for Loan Losses: We recorded a provision for loan losses of $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $2.3 million from the same period last year. The decline in the provision for loan losses correlates to the recent stabilization of the loan portfolio, modest charge-offs during the last six months and management’s analysis of non-performing loans, and credit risks inherent in the overall loan portfolio.

Non-interest Income: Non-interest income was $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $1.6 million for the same period last year. The increase was primarily attributable to a decreased level of OREO losses of $170,000, a higher gain on the sale of SBA loans of $111,000 and an increase in loan fees of $164,000.

Non-interest Expense: Non-interest expense increased $458,000 to $8.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, from $7.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The increase was primarily due to an increase in compensation and benefits of $530,000 resulting from additional staff, salary increases and increased benefit costs.

Income Taxes: The Company recorded income tax expense of $2.8 million, on income before taxes of $7.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, resulting in an effective tax rate of 39.1%, compared to income tax expense of $1.5 million on income before taxes of $5.4 million for the same period in 2012, resulting in an effective tax rate of 28.2%. The increase in income tax expense is due to the increase in pre-tax income in the 2013 period.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013								2012
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Yield/ Cost			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Yield/ Cost
	(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Assets
Loans	$	634,111		$	17,811		5.66	%	$	617,360		$	18,871		6.15	%
Investment securities		23,278			383		3.32	%		25,793			540		4.21	%
Federal funds sold and cash equivalents		56,306			73		0.26	%		98,248			119		0.24	%
Total interest-earning assets		713,695		$	18,267		5.16	%		741,401		$	19,530		5.30	%

Other assets		61,565								55,650
Allowance for loan losses		(19,979	)							(18,867	)
Total assets	$	755,281							$	778,184

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest bearing deposits:
NOWs	$	23,154		$	65		0.57	%	$	18,549		$	68		0.74	%
Money markets		84,748			292		0.69	%		96,348			414		0.86	%
Savings		230,871			838		0.73	%		218,335			1,060		0.98	%
Time deposits		238,803			1,375		1.16	%		259,035			1,775		1.38	%
Brokered certificates of deposit		16,272			94		1.16	%		24,131			142		1.18	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		593,848			2,664		0.90	%		616,398			3,459		1.13	%
Borrowings		42,282			426		2.03	%		48,470			475		1.97	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		636,130		$	3,090		0.98	%		664,868		$	3,934		1.19	%

Non-interest bearing deposits		29,244								29,677
Other liabilities		4,339								4,355
Total liabilities		669,713								698,900
Shareholders’ equity		85,568								79,284
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	755,281							$	778,184
Net interest income				$	15,177							$	15,596
Interest rate spread							4.18	%							4.11	%
Net interest margin							4.29	%							4.23	%

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

General: Net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended June 30, 2013 was $1.7 million, compared to $1.6 million for the same period in 2012. The change was impacted by the following:

Interest Income: Interest income decreased $699,000, or 7.2%, to $9.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, from $9.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease is attributable to lower yield on loans. Average loans for the three month period ended June 30, 2013 were $637.2 million compared to $614.8 million for the same period last year. The average yield on loans was 5.52% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 6.12% for the same period in 2012.

Interest Expense: Interest expense decreased $427,000 to $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, from $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease is primarily attributable to a lower average cost of deposits as the Bank has been able to re-price deposits due to the current, historically low, interest rate environment and the drop in the average deposit balances. The average rate paid on deposits for the three month period ended June 30, 2013 was 0.88% compared to 1.09% for the same period last year.

Net Interest Income: Net interest income decreased $272,000 to $7.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $7.8 million for the same period last year. We experienced an increase in our net interest rate spread of six basis points, to 4.15% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, from 4.09% for the same period last year. Our net interest margin increased five basis points to 4.26% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, from 4.21% for the same period last year.

Provision for Loan Losses: We recorded a provision for loan losses of $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, a decrease of $1.1 million from the same period last year. The decline in the provision for losses correlates to the recent stabilization of the loan portfolio, modest charge-offs during the last three months and management’s analysis of non-performing loans, and credit risks inherent in the overall loan portfolio.

Non-interest Income: Non-interest income was $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $531,000 for the same period last year. The increase was primarily attributable to lower OREO losses of $446,000 and a higher gain on the sale of SBA loans of $214,000.

Non-interest Expense: Non-interest expense increased $237,000 to $4.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, from $4.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The increase was primarily due to an increase in compensation and benefits of $314,000 resulting from additional staff, salary increases and increased benefit costs.

Income Taxes: The Company recorded income tax expense of $1.4 million, on income before taxes of $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, resulting in an effective tax rate of 39.2%, compared to income tax expense of $257,000 on income before taxes of $2.2 million for the same period of 2012, resulting in an effective tax rate of 11.4%. The increase in income tax expense is due to a change in tax treatment for bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) income recorded during the 2012 quarter.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013								2012
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Yield/ Cost			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Yield/ Cost
	(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Assets
Loans	$	637,204		$	8,765		5.52	%	$	614,771		$	9,358		6.12	%
Investment securities		22,606			179		3.18	%		24,894			252		4.07	%
Federal funds sold and cash equivalents		45,297			33		0.29	%		101,204			66		0.26	%
Total interest-earning assets		705,107		$	8,977		5.11	%		740,869		$	9,676		5.25	%

Other assets		60,943								57,452
Allowance for loan losses		(20,377	)							(17,725	)
Total assets	$	745,673							$	780,596

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest bearing deposits:
NOWs	$	23,196		$	31		0.54	%	$	19,009		$	34		0.72	%
Money markets		84,150			147		0.70	%		97,884			202		0.83	%
Savings		231,974			423		0.73	%		221,936			514		0.93	%
Time deposits		232,642			651		1.12	%		259,914			868		1.34	%
Brokered certificates of deposit		12,793			37		1.16	%		23,889			69		1.16	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		584,755			1,289		0.88	%		622,632			1,687		1.09	%
Borrowings		40,757			204		2.01	%		43,945			233		2.13	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		625,512			1,493		0.96	%		666,577			1,920		1.16	%

Non-interest bearing deposits		29,646								29,444
Other liabilities		4,449								4,733
Total liabilities		659,607								700,754
Shareholders’ equity		86,066								79,842
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	745,673							$	780,596
Net interest income				$	7,484							$	7,756
Interest rate spread							4.15	%							4.09	%
Net interest margin							4.26	%							4.21	%

Critical Accounting Policies

In the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, management has adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by management that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. Management considers these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions used are based on historical experience and other factors, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates under different conditions, resulting in a change that could have a material impact on the carrying values of assets and liabilities and results of operations.

Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged to income. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment.

In evaluating the allowance for loan losses, management considers historical loss factors, the mix of the loan portfolio (types of loans and amounts), geographic and industry concentrations, current national and local economic conditions and other factors related to the collectability of the loan portfolio, including underlying collateral values and estimated future cash flows. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as residential real estate, home equity loans, and consumer loans, are evaluated in the aggregate under FASB ASC Topic 450, “Accounting for Contingencies”, using historical loss factors adjusted for economic conditions and other qualitative factors which include trends in delinquencies, classified and non-performing loans, loan concentrations by loan category and by property type, seasonality of the portfolio, internal and external analysis of credit quality, peer group data, loan charge offs, local and national economic conditions and single and total credit exposure. Large balance and/or more complex loans, such as multi-family and commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans, and construction loans are evaluated individually for impairment in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310 “Receivables”. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective interest rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available or as projected events change.

Management reviews the level of the allowance monthly. Although management used the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. In addition, the FDIC and the Department, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would adversely affect earnings.

Other Than Temporary Impairment on Investment Securities: Management periodically performs analyses to determine whether there has been an OTTI in the value of one or more securities. The available for sale securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair value, with any unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in stockholder’s equity. The held to maturity securities portfolio, consisting of debt securities for which there is a positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, is carried at amortized cost. Management conducts a quarterly review and evaluation of the securities portfolio to determine if the value of any security has declined below its cost or amortized cost, and whether such decline is other-than-temporary. If such decline is deemed other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the security is adjusted by writing down the security to estimated fair market value through a charge to current period earnings to the extent that such decline is credit related. All other changes in unrealized gains or losses for investment securities available for sale are recorded, net of tax effect, through other comprehensive income.

Income Taxes: Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the difference between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income in the future.

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that ultimately would be sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more-likely-than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. The evaluation of a tax position taken is considered by itself and not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more likely-than not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.

Liquidity: Liquidity describes the ability of the Company to meet the financial obligations that arise out of the ordinary course of business. Liquidity addresses the Company's ability to meet deposit withdrawals on demand or at contractual maturity, to repay borrowings as they mature, and to fund current and planned expenditures. Liquidity is derived from increased repayment and income from interest-earning assets. The loan to deposit ratio was 105.7% and 98.8% at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Funds received from new and existing depositors provided a large source of liquidity for the six month period ended June 30, 2013. The Company seeks to rely primarily on core deposits from customers to provide stable and cost-effective sources of funding to support loan growth. The Company also seeks to augment such deposits with longer term and higher yielding certificates of deposit. To the extent that retail deposits are not adequate to fund customer loan demand, liquidity needs can be met in the short-term funds market. Longer term funding can be obtained through advances from the FHLB. As of June 30, 2013, the Company maintained lines of credit with the FHLB of $95.8 million, of which $20.4 million was outstanding at June 30, 2013.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company's investment securities portfolio included $12.1 million of mortgage-backed securities that provide cash flow each month. The majority of the investment portfolio is classified as available for sale, is marketable, and is available to meet liquidity needs. The Company's residential real estate portfolio includes loans, which are underwritten to secondary market criteria, and accordingly could be sold in the secondary mortgage market if needed as an additional source of liquidity. The Company's management is not aware of any known trends, demands, commitments or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to result in material changes in liquidity.

Capital: A strong capital position is fundamental to support the continued growth of the Company. The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements. Regulatory capital is defined in terms of Tier I capital (shareholders' equity as adjusted for unrealized gains or losses on available for sale securities), Tier II capital (which includes a portion of the allowance for loan losses) and total capital (Tier I plus Tier II). Risk-based capital ratios are expressed as a percentage of risk-weighted assets. Risk-weighted assets are determined by assigning various weights to all assets and off-balance sheet associated risk in accordance with regulatory criteria. Regulators have also adopted minimum Tier I leverage ratio standards, which measure the ratio of Tier I capital to total assets.

At June 30, 2013, management believes that the Company and the Bank are "well-capitalized" and in compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable as the Company is a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (the "Exchange Act")), the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

Internal Controls

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. During the last quarter, there was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company was not a party to any material legal proceedings.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Not applicable as the Company is a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

31.1 Certification of CEO required by Rule 13a-14(a).

31.2 Certification of CFO required by Rule 13a-14(a).

32	Certification required by 18 U.S.C. §1350.

101.INS XBRL Instance Document *

101.SCH XBRL Schema Document *

101.CAL XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document *

101.LAB XBRL Labels Linkbase Document *

101.PRE XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document *

101.DEF XBRL Definition Linkbase Document *

* Submitted as Exhibits 101 to this Form 10-K are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		PARKE BANCORP, INC.



Date: August 14, 2013		/s/ Vito S. Pantilione
		Vito S. Pantilione
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)




Date: August 14, 2013		/s/ John F. Hawkins
		John F. Hawkins
		Senior Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Accounting Officer)